ANALYSIS the Prairie (1827) James Fenimore Cooper (1789-1851)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ANALYSIS The Prairie (1827) James Fenimore Cooper (1789-1851) The Prairie was Cooper’s favorite in his Leatherstocking series, he spent more time on it than on any other book in the Saga, it is the most rich and complex--his best--and it brings his vision into the closest relation to modern America, as in his concern for preserving the natural environment. This allegorical romance is the finale in the chronology of Natty Bumppo’s life, as he personifies the best spirit of the westward movement confronting the worst to come as represented by Ishmael Bush. The tone is elegiac, leading to the death of Leatherstocking. The book opens with a quotation from Shakespeare’s As You Like It that parallels Natty to Christ, implying a spiritual allegory and casting him as the pastoral “good shepherd”: “I pray thee, shepherd, if that love, or gold, / Can in this desert place buy entertainment, / Bring us where we may rest ourselves and feed.” Many critics such as Mark Twain and Bret Harte have ridiculed Cooper for not being a Realist, as if he could or should have had an entirely different education, life experience, sensibility and outlook--as if he could or should have ignored his own reality and his Victorian audience and written according to aesthetic principles that evolved and governed literary fiction long after his death. Cooper’s quotation from Shakespeare indicates that he is writing a romance, just as suggested by critic Leslie Fiedler: “In all [his] magic woods (sometimes more like those of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night's Dream than any native forest)...” [Love and Death in the American Novel (1960) 201] “He treats the portion of the Plains in which the action takes place as if it were an Elizabethan stage, a neutral space where any character may be brought at a moment's notice without arousing in the audience a desire to have the entrance accounted for.” [Henry Nash Smith, Introduction to The Prairie (1962)] The refusal by Realists to respect Cooper’s romances, even when he parallels Shakespeare, is comparable to the illiterate vulgarity of the Duke and the King in their representation of Shakespeare. Of course Cooper himself, though a great writer, is far from measuring up to Shakespeare. His qualities transcend his faults, but his faults are fun to laugh at: COMIC RELIEF 1. Unnecessary exposition and wordiness: “It is necessary, in order that the thread of the narrative should not be spun to a length which might fatigue the reader [!], that he should imagine a week to have intervened between the scene with which the preceding chapter closed and the events with which it is our intention to resume its relation in this.” (opening sentence, Chapter 8) “Having made the reader acquainted with the manner in which Ishmael Bush had disposed of his family, under circumstances that might have proved so embarrassing to most other men, we shall again shift the scene a few short miles from the place last described, preserving, however, the due and natural succession of time.” (opening sentence, Chapter 9) 2. Absurd exposition, as Cooper establishes family relationships in one outburst from Ellen Wade: “You mean Ishmael Bush, my father’s brother's widow's husband...” (end Chapter 11) 3. Incredible coincidence, or mental telepathy: “’Have I a man among my children?’ demanded Esther... ‘Stay, mother,’ exclaimed Abner and Enoch; ‘if you will see the creature’ let us drive it into view’.” (italics added, end Chapter 12) The boys are like half a barbershop quartet. 4. Ridiculous deafness of Bush family during Indian raid: “His voice was, however, lost, or rather unheeded, in the midst of the shrieks, shouts, and yells that were, by this time, bursting from fifty mouths on every side of him.... They tossed their arms wildly in the air, leaping up and down more like exulting children than sober men, and continued to utter the most frantic cries. In the midst of this tumultuous disorder a rushing sound was heard, similar to that which might be expected to precede the passage of a flight of buffaloes, and then came the flocks and cattle of Ishmael in one confused and frightened drove...all eyes were directed to the passing whirlwind of men and beasts... The wild animals snorted with joy and terror, and tearing the earth with their heels, they dashed away into the broad prairies, in a dozen different directions....‘The family is stirring,’ cried Ellen...” (Chapter 5) 5. In Chapter 14, out on the prairie, the Bush family takes refuge on a rock that is about 200 feet high. Characters on the ground engage in long conversations with characters high above them at a distance of 200 feet! On the ground, Dr. Battius poses a question to Ellen Wade high over his head: “’I know not the meaning of all you wish to say, Dr. Battius,’ she quietly replied.” 6. Elsewhere, also, Dr. Battius and Natty engage in philosophical discourse--Natty on his horse and Dr. Batty on his ass--while at full gallop hotly pursued by hostile Indians! SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Cooper inherited his view of social evolution from the Enlightenment of the previous century, in particular from the French Encyclopedists and their successors, mainly Condorcet: All human societies pass through a series of stages, beginning with (1) the solitary hunter in the forest (Natty Bumppo); (2) followed by “patriarchal” migratory tribes (Ishmael Bush & family); (3) the beginnings of pastoral agriculture, the stage of Crèvecoeur and Thomas Jefferson, Cooper himself and Middleton in The Prairie; (4) and on through ever more artificial forms of social organization (Dr. Battius). THE PRAIRIE AS A METAPHOR 1. The prairie is a metaphor of life: “The world was, in truth, no better than a desert, and...there was but one hand [Christ/Moses/Natty] that could lead the most learned man [Dr. Battius] through all its crooked windings.” (Chapter 8) 2. The prairie of Natty is analogous to the Biblical desert of Moses: “...remarkable for its barrenness...”; “’It is true; but Egypt--nay much of Africa furnishes still more striking proofs of this exhaustion of nature’.” (Chapter 22) 3. The prairie is a symbolic warning that makes this book the first work of environmentalism in American literature. In Chapter 2, when Natty observes the Bush pioneers overcutting trees, Cooper expresses his ambivalence with a pun, questioning their form of “progress.” Then Natty “turned away muttering to himself with a bitter smile, like one who disdained giving a more audible utterance to his discontent.” (Chapter 2) “What will the Yankee choppers say, when they find that a hand, which can lay the ‘arth bare at a blow, has been here and swept the country, in very mockery of their wickedness. They will turn on their tracks like a fox that doubles, and then the rank smell of their own footsteps will show them the madness of their waste.” (Chapter 7) This passage prefigures the plot, as in the end Ishmael Bush turns back on his tracks. 4. The prairie is a prophecy of the literal and spiritual wastelands to come if the values of Natty die with him, anticipating “The Waste Land” (1922) by T. S. Eliot, the most influential poem of the 20th century: “It will not be long before an accursed band of choppers and loggers will be following on their heels, to humble the wilderness which lies so broad and rich on the western banks of the Mississippi, and then the land will be a peopled desert, from the shores of the main sea to the foot of the Rocky Mountains; filled with all the abominations and craft of man, and stript of the comforts and loveliness it received from the hands of the Lord!” (Chapter 18) FAITH AND MANIFEST DESTINY Chapter 6 opens with an essay applauding the early New England Puritans for their virtues, but Cooper, like Hawthorne, thinks Calvinism is a destructive ideology in the long term and sees later generations of New Englanders as degenerate exploiters. Though lately from Tennessee, Ishmael Bush is called a “Yankee chopper.” His character, biblical name, and religious practice identify him with the Calvinistic tradition. Cooper goes on to affirm independence, democracy, the march of civilization westward, and Manifest Destiny as divine Providence. In Chapter 15 he expresses his Christian faith, then accommodates the prevailing deism of intellectuals during the Enlightenment, affirming “Providence--or if that imposing word is too just to be classical, fate...” In Chapter 15 he accuses Catholics of suppressing knowledge to maintain control of the believers and contrasts the faith of young Middleton, a model of the civilized man just as Natty is a model of the frontiersman: “Educated himself under the dominion of a simple and rational faith, in which nothing is attempted to be concealed from the believers...” His “rational faith” is implicitly Protestant in contrast to Catholic, and also in contrast to the primitive Calvinism of Ishmael Bush. THE GARDEN OF THE WEST At the end of Chapter 10, a reference is made to the Lewis and Clark expedition of 1804, placing the narrative in historical time with poetic license as to dates: “Lewis is making his way up the river, some hundreds of miles from this.” On the second page of the book, Cooper alludes indirectly to Daniel Boone, the principal model for Natty: “This adventurous and venerable patriarch was now seen making his last remove.” In historical fact, Boone moved to Missouri in 1799, not 1804. Cooper also drops a footnote saying that “Colonel Boon” was “in his ninety-second year.” In fact, Boone was 65 in 1804.