DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 1: Summary Details for the Specimens of the 16 Generalist Morphospecies from Which a COI Barcode Was Obtained

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table 1: Summary details for the specimens of the 16 generalist morphospecies from which a COI barcode was obtained No. of host species among those No. Morphospecies Interim Name barcoded Host families and species Barcoded reared "Anoxynops auratus" 34 49 Nymphalidae, Magneuptychia Anoxynops auratusDHJ01 1 gigas 1 Nymphalidae, Antirrhea Anoxynops auratusDHJ03 1 miltiades 1 Nymphalidae, Siderone Anoxynops auratusDHJ04 1 marthesia 4 Nymphalidae, Caligo Anoxynops auratusDHJ05 2 telamonius, C. eurilochus 2 Nymphalidae, Opsiphanes Anoxynops auratusDHJ06 2 tamarindi, O. bogotanus 10 Nymphalidae, Opsiphanes Anoxynops auratusDHJ07 1 quiteria 10 Nymphalidae, Opsiphanes Anoxynops auratusDHJ08 1 cassina 7 "Blepharipa albicauda" Blepharipa albicauda at least 21 at least 7 families 108 226 "Blepharipa fimbriata" 221 483 Hesperiidae, Achlyodes busirus, Blepharipa fimbriataDHJ01 2 A. thraso 23 Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae; 2 records of Nymphalidae, Blepharipa fimbriataDHJ04 at least 24 Manataria maculata 123 Notodontidae, Lirimiris, Farigia, Blepharipa fimbriataDHJ11 4 Heterocampa 28 Saturniidae, Syssphinx, Blepharipa fimbriataDHJ12 4 Ptiloscola dargei 47 "Chetogena scutellaris" 82 172 Chetogena scutellarisDHJ01 at least 22 at least 12 families 38 Chetogena scutellarisDHJ02 at least 20 at least 9 families 44 "Drino piceiventris" 223 455 Sphingidae, Callionima Drino piceiventrisDHJ03 1 denticulata 22 Drino piceiventrisDHJ04 1 Sphingidae, Adhemarius ypsilon 13 Sphingidae, Manduca, Erinnyis, Drino piceiventrisDHJ05 12 Eumorpha, Madoryx; rain forest 46 Sphingidae, Manduca, Protambulyx, Madoryx, dry Drino piceiventrisDHJ06 6 forest 16 Sphingidae, Enyo, Eumorpha, Aleuron, on Drino piceiventrisDHJ07 5 Dilleniaceae/Vitaceae 27 Sphingidae, Cautethia spuria, C. Drino piceiventrisDHJ08 2 yucatana 4 Sphingidae, Erinnyis, Drino piceiventrisDHJ09 3 Eupyrrhoglossum 4 Sphingidae, Enyo, Aleuron, Drino piceiventrisDHJ10 5 Erinnyis 14 Drino piceiventrisDHJ11 3 Sphinigdae, Pachylia, Erinnyis 24 Drino piceiventrisDHJ13 2 Sphingidae, Enyo 5 Sphingidae, Aellopos fadus, A. Drino piceiventrisDHJ17 2 titan; dry forest 16 Sphingidae, Aellopos ceculus, A. Drino piceiventrisDHJ18 2 titan; rain forest 32 "Drino rhoeo" 39 205 Drino rhoeoDHJ01 1 Sphingidae, Manduca florestan 25 Sphingidae, Manduca dilucida, Drino rhoeoDHJ02 2 M. sexta 4 Sphingidae, Manduca corallina, Drino rhoeoDHJ03 2 M. dilucida 10 "Eucelatoria armigera" 98 451 Pyralidae, Chloropaschia Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ01 1 mennusalis 21 Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ02 1 Noctuidae, Radara zoum 2 Noctuidae, Coenipeta phasia, C. Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ03 2 colliquens 5 Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ04 1 Noctuidae, Azeta rhodogaster 32 Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ05 1 Noctuidae, Anomis luridula 12 Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ06 1 Crambidae, Palpita flegia 3 Noctuidae, Pseudaleteia sequax, Pyralidae, Macalla thyrsisalis; Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ07 3 gregarious species 22 Pyralidae, Accinctapubes Eucelatoria armigeraDHJ08 1 albifasciata 1 “Hemisturmia tenuipalpis” 78 101 Hemisturmia tenuipalpisDHJ01 1 Immidae 2 Hemisturmia tenuipalpisDHJ02 1 Saturniidae, Hylesia umbrata 2 Hemisturmia tenuipalpisDHJ03 10 5 families, mostly Saturniidae 67 Crambidae, Cliniodes opalalis, Hemisturmia tenuipalpisDHJ04 2 C. nomadalis 7 "Hyphantrophaga blanda" 84 297 Geometridae, Cyclomia Hyphantrophaga blandaDHJ02 1 disparilis 8 Crambidae, Omiodes cunculalis, Hyphantrophaga blandaDHJ03 3 C. fulvicauda, C. humeralis 43 Hyphantrophaga blandaDHJ06 21 at least 7 families 33 Hyphantrophaga virilis Hyphantrophaga virilis at least 153 at least 15 families 135 478 Lespesia aletiae Lespesia aletiae at least 55 at least 12 families 221 321 "Lespesia parviteres" 82 161 Lespesia parviteresDHJ01 2 Pieridae, Itaballia, Ganyra 3 Lespesia parviteresDHJ02 1 Noctuidae, Radara inordinata 6 Lespesia parviteresDHJ04 4 Riodinidae 8 Hesperiidae, Noctuidae mostly Lespesia parviteresDHJ06 6 Mocis repanda 65 "Lespesia postica" 132 181 Notodontidae, Disphragis Lespesia posticaDHJ01 2 gelduba, D. mortis 25 Noctuidae, 31 Neotuerta Lespesia posticaDHJ05 2 sabulosa, 1 other 32 Lespesia posticaDHJ06 6 Noctuidae, 6 species of Cropia 58 Megalopygidae, Geometridae, Lespesia posticaDHJ07 5 Mimallonidae 15 Noctuidae, Chalcoecia Lespesia posticaDHJ08 1 harminella 1 Lespesia posticaDHJ11 1 Noctuidae 1 "Patelloa xanthura" 333 729 Patelloa xanthuraDHJ01 at least 145 at least 19 families 300 Patelloa xanthuraDHJ03 3 Papilionidae, Battus, Pareides 5 Patelloa xanthuraDHJ04 6 Hesperiidae, plus 1 Arctiidae 11 Saturniidae, Limacodidae, Patelloa xanthuraDHJ05 6 Nymphalidae, all spiny 15 Patelloa xanthuraDHJ06 1 Limacodidae 1 Patelloa xanthuraDHJ02 1 Papilionidae 1 "Siphosturmia rafaeli" 234 370 Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ01 1 Hesperiidae, Pellicia arina 9 Hesperiidae, Chiomara, Ebrietas, Gorgythion, Ouleus, Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ02 8 Pythonides, Quadrus, Sostrata 89 Hesperiidae, Nisoniades, Paches, Noctuana, Pachyneuria, Pellicia dimidiata, Polyctor, Quadrus, Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ03 10 Saliana, Tosta 101 Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ04 1 Hesperiidae, Polythrix asine 8 Hesperiidae, Pythonides, Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ05 2 Quadrus 5 Hesperiidae, Pythonides, Siphosturmia rafaeliDHJ06 3 Quadrus 22 "Winthemia tricolor" 26 34 Arctiidae, Dysschema Winthemia tricolorDHJ01 1 leucophaea 8 Winthemia tricolorDHJ02 1 Arctiidae, Pachydota saduca 2 Geometridae, Nephodia Winthemia tricolorDHJ03 1 Janzen01 15 Winthemia tricolorDHJ04 1 Geometridae 1 .
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) Q ⇑ Marianne Espeland A,B, , Jason P.W

    Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) Q ⇑ Marianne Espeland A,B, , Jason P.W

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 93 (2015) 296–306 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Ancient Neotropical origin and recent recolonisation: Phylogeny, biogeography and diversification of the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) q ⇑ Marianne Espeland a,b, , Jason P.W. Hall c, Philip J. DeVries d, David C. Lees e, Mark Cornwall a, Yu-Feng Hsu f, Li-Wei Wu g, Dana L. Campbell a,h, Gerard Talavera a,i,j, Roger Vila i, Shayla Salzman a, Sophie Ruehr k, David J. Lohman l, Naomi E. Pierce a a Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Powell Hall, 2315 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA c Department of Systematic Biology-Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-127, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lake Shore Drive, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA e Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK f Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan g The Experimental Forest, College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Nantou, Taiwan h Division of Biological Sciences, School of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, University of Washington Bothell, Box 358500, 18115 Campus Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011-8246, USA i Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain j Faculty of Biology & Soil Science, St.
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera

    Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera

    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist

    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist

    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
  • Genomic Analysis of the Tribe Emesidini (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae)

    Genomic Analysis of the Tribe Emesidini (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae)

    Zootaxa 4668 (4): 475–488 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:211AFB6A-8C0A-4AB2-8CF6-981E12C24934 Genomic analysis of the tribe Emesidini (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) JING ZHANG1, JINHUI SHEN1, QIAN CONG1,2 & NICK V. GRISHIN1,3 1Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and 3Howard Hughes Medical Insti- tute, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, USA 75390-9050; [email protected] 2present address: Institute for Protein Design and Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, HSB J-405, Seattle, WA, USA 98195; [email protected] Abstract We obtained and phylogenetically analyzed whole genome shotgun sequences of nearly all species from the tribe Emesidini Seraphim, Freitas & Kaminski, 2018 (Riodinidae) and representatives from other Riodinidae tribes. We see that the recently proposed genera Neoapodemia Trujano, 2018 and Plesioarida Trujano & García, 2018 are closely allied with Apodemia C. & R. Felder, [1865] and are better viewed as its subgenera, new status. Overall, Emesis Fabricius, 1807 and Apodemia (even after inclusion of the two subgenera) are so phylogenetically close that several species have been previously swapped between these two genera. New combinations are: Apodemia (Neoapodemia) zela (Butler, 1870), Apodemia (Neoapodemia) ares (Edwards, 1882), and Apodemia (Neoapodemia) arnacis (Stichel, 1928) (not Emesis); and Emesis phyciodoides (Barnes & Benjamin, 1924) (not Apodemia), assigned to each genus by their monophyly in genomic trees with the type species (TS) of the genus.
  • Anchored Phylogenomics Illuminates the Skipper Butterfly Tree of Life

    Anchored Phylogenomics Illuminates the Skipper Butterfly Tree of Life

    Anchored phylogenomics illuminates the skipper butterfly tree of life The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Toussaint, E. F. A., J. W. Breinholt, C. Earl, A. D. Warren, A. V. Z. Brower, M. Yago, K. M. Dexter, et al. 2018. “Anchored phylogenomics illuminates the skipper butterfly tree of life.” BMC Evolutionary Biology 18 (1): 101. doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1216-z. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1216-z. Published Version doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1216-z Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37298562 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Toussaint et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018) 18:101 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1216-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Anchored phylogenomics illuminates the skipper butterfly tree of life Emmanuel F. A. Toussaint1* , Jesse W. Breinholt1,2, Chandra Earl1, Andrew D. Warren1, Andrew V. Z. Brower3, Masaya Yago4, Kelly M. Dexter1, Marianne Espeland5, Naomi E. Pierce6, David J. Lohman7,8,9 and Akito Y. Kawahara1 Abstract Background: Butterflies (Papilionoidea) are perhaps the most charismatic insect lineage, yet phylogenetic relationships among them remain incompletely studied and controversial. This is especially true for skippers (Hesperiidae), one of the most species-rich and poorly studied butterfly families. Methods: To infer a robust phylogenomic hypothesis for Hesperiidae, we sequenced nearly 400 loci using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment and sampled all tribes and more than 120 genera of skippers.
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
  • Apodemia Mormo ) Oviposition Behaviour in Canada

    Apodemia Mormo ) Oviposition Behaviour in Canada

    34 THE CANADIAN FIELD -N ATURALIST Vol. 126 First Observations of Mormon Metalmark ( Apodemia mormo ) Oviposition Behaviour in Canada ASHLEY ANNE WICK 1, 4 , JOHANE JANELLE 2, SHELLEY PRUSS 3, and NADIR ERBILGIN 1 1Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada ; email: [email protected] 2Box 218, Val Marie, Saskatchewan S0N 2T0 Canada 3Parks Canada Agency, Western and Northern Service Centre, Calgary, Alberta T2P 3M3 Canada 4Corresponding author Wick, Ashley Anne, Johane Janelle, Shelley Pruss, and Nadir Erbilgin. 2012. First observations of Mormon Metalmark (Apodemia mormo ) oviposition behaviour in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 126(1): 3 4–37. We present new information on oviposition behaviour in the Mormon Metalmark, Apodemia mormo Felder and Felder, 1859 , documented in Grasslands National Park of Canada, Saskatchewan, in August 2011. The Mormon Metalmark is found through - out the U.S. southwest; little is known about its life history in the northern populations found in Canada. We provide photo - graphic documentation of the butterfly laying single eggs directly on soil or rocks. These observations differ from those recorded in the southern part of its range, where it lays eggs in groups of 2–4 on various locations of the host plant, Branched Umbrella- Plant, Eriogonum pauciflorum Pursh. This is the first published account of oviposition behaviour of this species in Canada in the most northern part of its range. Key Words: Mormon Metalmark, Apodemia mormo, Grasslands National Park of Canada, Saskatchewan, Lepidoptera, ovipo - sition, eggs. The Mormon Metalmark, Apodemia mormo Felder Recent work on the population genetics of the Mor - and Felder, 1859, is a butterfly of the primarily neo - mon Metalmark in the northern part of its range has tropical family Riodinidae.
  • Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types

    Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types

    INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types.
  • NAOMI PIERCE, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    NAOMI PIERCE, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 51(1), 1997, 102 W. D. WINTER COLLECTION TO THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE Additional key words: Geometridae, Noctuidae, New England. In October 1996, the Lepidoptera collection of William D. (Dave) Winter (Westwood, Massachusetts) was donated to the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard Univer­ sity (MCZ). This collection represents a most important regional taxonomic resource, with superbly prepared and documented specimens, often with an abundance of affiliated host­ plant and related biological information. The Winter material at the MCZ presently totals 18,077 specimens, 16,079 from the 1996 donation and 1998 from donations between 1979- 1989. The strongest holdings are in the Noctuidae and Geometridae, although there is good representation of many groups. Virtually all the material was either collected personally by Dave, or reared by him from stock that he secured or obtained from other lepidopter­ ists (few specimens are the result of direct exchange or gift). Dave ran a light trap for moths regularly in his back yard, with the back yard moving around in Westwood (from the early 1960s to 1975) and then on to nearby Dedham (1975 to 1995), in mostly semi­ open environments with mixed hardwoods. Over time, the radius of his local butterfly and moth collecting expanded to include mucb of New England, Long Island, and northern New Jersey. Dave and his wife, Jo Brewer, also traveled extenSively throughout North America to photograph and collect, with favored localities including Sanibel and Captiva Islands in Florida, and Ossibaw Island in Georgia. Table 1 provides a synopsis of the MCZ donation.
  • Phylogenomics Reveals Major Diversification Rate Shifts in The

    Phylogenomics Reveals Major Diversification Rate Shifts in The

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/517995; this version posted January 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Phylogenomics reveals major diversification rate shifts in the evolution of silk moths and 2 relatives 3 4 Hamilton CA1,2*, St Laurent RA1, Dexter, K1, Kitching IJ3, Breinholt JW1,4, Zwick A5, Timmermans 5 MJTN6, Barber JR7, Kawahara AY1* 6 7 Institutional Affiliations: 8 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA 9 2Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, & Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 10 83844 USA 11 3Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 12 4RAPiD Genomics, 747 SW 2nd Avenue #314, Gainesville, FL 32601. USA 13 5Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Clunies Ross St, Acton, ACT 2601, Canberra, 14 Australia 15 6Department of Natural Sciences, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK 16 7Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA 17 *Correspondence: [email protected] (CAH) or [email protected] (AYK) 18 19 20 Abstract 21 The silkmoths and their relatives (Bombycoidea) are an ecologically and taxonomically 22 diverse superfamily that includes some of the most charismatic species of all the Lepidoptera. 23 Despite displaying some of the most spectacular forms and ecological traits among insects, 24 relatively little attention has been given to understanding their evolution and the drivers of 25 their diversity.
  • An Introduction to Butterfly Watching

    An Introduction to Butterfly Watching

    TEXAS PA RK S AN D W I LD LIF E An Introduction to Butterfly Watching Revised June 2009 Mike Quinn & Mark Klym An Introduction to Butterfly Watching TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................2 Texas’ Place within North American Butterfly Diversity . .3 Graph: Areas of Greatest North American Butterfly Diversity . .4 Short History of Butterfly Watching in Texas .............................4 Close­focusing Binoculars ............................................7 Photography .......................................................8 Checklists .........................................................8 Insect Classification .................................................9 Overview of Butterfly Families .......................................10 Butterfly Finding Suggestions ........................................12 The Butterfly Life Cycle .............................................13 Behaviors and Concentrators .........................................15 Butterfly Gardening ................................................16 Quality Nectar Plants ...............................................17 Caterpillar Food Plants ..............................................19 Illustration: Parts of a Butterfly . .20­21 How to Identify Caterpillars .........................................22 Rearing Caterpillars ................................................23 How to Become a Better Butterflier ...................................23 Butterfly Conservation ..............................................24