DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 7 References

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 7 References 7 References CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES Summary Census Viewer. 2012. Jacumba Hot Springs, California Population: Census 2010 and 2000 Interactive Map, Demographics, Statistics, Quick Facts. Accessed June 18. http://censusviewer.com/city/CA/Jacumba%20(Jacumba%20Hot%20Springs. County of San Diego. 2016. Mountain Empire Subregional Plan; San Diego County General Plan. Adopted January 3, 1979; adopted August 3, 2011; amended December 14, 2016. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/docs/CP/MTN_Empire_CP.pdf. 1 Project Description County of San Diego. 2006. County of San Diego Environmental Impact Report Format and General Content Requirements. 2 Significant Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project 2.1 Aesthetics AirNav.com. 2019. L78 Jacumba Airport (Jacumba, California, USA). Accessed March 12, 2019. https://www.airnav.com/airport/L78. BLM (Bureau of Land Management). 2008. Eastern San Diego County Resource Management Plan. El Centro, California: BLM. October 2008. http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/ elcentro/esdrmp.html. BLM. 2020. “Carrizo Gorge Wilderness.” Accessed February 1, 2020. https://www.blm.gov/ visit/carrizo-gorge-wilderness. California State Parks. 2005. Anza Borrego Desert State Park General Plan. Approved by Commission February 11, 2005. http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21314. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2017. “List of Eligible and Officially Designated State Scenic Highways.” Accessed March 12, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/ design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/index.html. Caltrans. 2019. “2017 Traffic Volumes for ALL vehicles on CA State Highways: I-8.” Accessed March 7, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/volumes2017/. October 2020 10743 JVR Energy Park Project Draft EIR 7-1 7 References Census Viewer. 2019. “Jacumba (Jacumba Hot Springs), California Population: Census 2010 and 2000 Interactive Map, Demographics, Statistics, Quick Facts.” Accessed June 20, 2019. http://censusviewer.com/. County of San Diego. 2005. County Trails Program and the Community Trails Master Plan – Boulevard. January 12, 2005. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/ pds/CTMP/trails-and-pathways-plan/BoulevardCommunityTrailsandPathwaysPlan.pdf. County of San Diego. 2007. County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Visual Resources. Land Use and Environmental Group, Department of Planning and Land Use, Department of Public Works. July 30, 2007. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/docs/ visual_guidelines.pdf. County of San Diego. 2009. County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Dark Skies and Glare. Land Use and Environmental Group, Department of Planning and Land Use, Department of Public Works. July 30, 2007; modified January 15, 2009. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/ content/dam/sdc/pds/ProjectPlanning/docs/Dark_Skies_Guidelines.pdf. County of San Diego. 2011a. San Diego County General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element. August 3, 2011. County of San Diego. 2011b. San Diego County General Plan: A Plan for Growth, Conservation, and Sustainability, Chapter 3, Land Use Element. August 3, 2011. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/gpupdate/docs/GP/ LandUseElement.pdf. County of San Diego. 2011c. San Diego County General Plan, Mobility Element. August 3, 2011. County of San Diego. 2011d. County of San Diego General Plan Update Jacumba Subregional Group Area: Vision Statement for Jacumba. Adopted August 3, 2011. County of San Diego. 2016a. Jacumba Solar Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Report. County of San Diego. 2016b. Mountain Empire Subregional Plan; San Diego County General Plan. Adopted January 3, 1979; adopted August 3, 2011; amended December 14, 2016. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/docs/CP/MTN_Empire_CP.pdf. County of San Diego. 2019. “Department of Public Works: Jacumba Airport.” Accessed March 12, 2019. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/dpw/airports/airportsmain/operations.html. October 2020 10743 JVR Energy Park Project Draft EIR 7-2 7 References CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) and BLM. 2011. Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the East County Substation, Tule Wind, and Energia Sierra Juarez Gen-Tie Projects. October 2011. East County Magazine 2020. “Jacumba Fall Festival – Jacumba Fall Festival Oct 5 Benefits Community’s Park.” Accessed July 10, 2020. https://www.eastcountymagazine.org/ jacumba-fall-festival. SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 2019. “Average Traffic Volumes – Local Jurisdictions (Unincorporated Area).” Accessed March 5, 2019. https://www.sandag.org/ resources/demographics_and_other_data/transportation/adtv/index.asp. State of California Legislature. 2006. Assembly Concurrent Resolution Relative to Historic U.S. Highway Route 80. February 23, 2006. Williams, Alexia S. 2020. Personal communication between A.S. Williams (BLM Outdoor Recreational Plan, El Centro Field Office) and J. Saunders (Dudek). February 11, 2020. 2.2 Air Quality Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2010. Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (CO Protocol). UCD-ITS-RR-97-21. Revised December 1997. File updated October 13, 2010. Accessed April 11, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/env/air/docs/ co-protocol-searchable.pdf. CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 2017. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2. Prepared by BREEZE Software, A Division of Trinity Consultants in collaboration with South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Districts. Accessed May 2018. http://caleemod.com/. CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2000. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. October 2000. http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/documents/rrpfinal.pdf. CARB. 2009. “California Ambient Air Quality Standards.” https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/ california-ambient-air-quality-standards. CARB. 2016a. “Ambient Air Quality Standards.” May 4, 2016. Accessed August 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. October 2020 10743 JVR Energy Park Project Draft EIR 7-3 7 References CARB. 2016b. “Area Designation Maps/State and National.” Last updated May 5, 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. CARB. 2016c. “iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics.” Accessed June 20, 2018. https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfourdisplay.php. CARB. 2017a. “Glossary of Air Pollutant Terms.” Accessed June 2017. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ html/gloss.htm. CARB. 2017b. Revised Proposed 2016 State Strategy for the State Implementation Plan. March 7. Accessed September 2018. https://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/2016sip/ rev2016statesip.pdf. CDPH (California Department of Public Health). 2016. Epidemiologic Summary of Coccidioidomycosis in California, 2016. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/ CDPH%20Document%20Library/CocciEpiSummary2016.pdf. County of San Diego. 1979. San Diego County Zoning Ordinance, Part Six: General Regulations, Section 6318, Odors. May 16, 1979. http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/ pds/zoning/index.html. County of San Diego. 2004. San Diego County Grading, Clearing and Watercourses Ordinance. San Diego County Code, Title 8, Division 7, Section 87.428, Dust Control Measures. April 23, 2004. http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dpw/docs/propgradord.pdf. County of San Diego. 2007. Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements – Air Quality. Department of Planning and Land Use, Department of Public Works. March 19, 2007. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2009. “Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter.” EPA/600/R-08/139F. EPA. 2013. “Integrated Science Assessment of Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants.” EPA/600R-10/076F. EPA. 2016a. “Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen-Health Criteria (2016 Final Report).” U.S. EPA, EPA/600/R-15/068, 2016. EPA. 2016b. “EPA Region 9 Air Quality Maps and Geographic Information.” Last updated April 27, 2016. Accessed August 2016. http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/maps/. October 2020 10743 JVR Energy Park Project Draft EIR 7-4 7 References EPA. 2016c. “Outdoor Air Quality Data.” Last Updated December 5, 2017. Accessed June 20, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/monitor-values-report. EPA. 2017a. “Six Common Air Pollutants.” Last updated April 3, 2017. http://www.epa.gov/ air/urbanair/. EPA. 2017b. “Process of Reviewing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” Accessed April 11, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national- ambient-air-quality-standards. Nelson, J. 2018. “Coccidioidomycosis data requests.” Email from J. Nelson (County of San Diego Health & Human Services Agency, Epidemiologist II) to R. Kelly (Dudek). June 19, 2018. OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program, Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Accessed September 2018. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/ 2015guidancemanual.pdf. SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 2015. San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. October 2015. Accessed April 2017. http://www.sdforward.com/pdfs/ Final_PDFs/ The_Plan_combined.pdf. Sardar, S. 2019. “SAFE Rule emission factor adjustments in CalEEMod.” Telephone conversation between S. Sardar (CARB) and J. Reed (Dudek). December 13, 2019. SDAPCD (San Diego Air
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 3.3 Geology Jan 09 02 ER Rev4
    3.3 Geology and Soils 3.3.1 Introduction and Summary Table 3.3-1 summarizes the geology and soils impacts for the Proposed Project and alternatives. TABLE 3.3-1 Summary of Geology and Soils Impacts1 Alternative 2: 130 KAFY Proposed Project: On-farm Irrigation Alternative 3: 300 KAFY System 230 KAFY Alternative 4: All Conservation Alternative 1: Improvements All Conservation 300 KAFY Measures No Project Only Measures Fallowing Only LOWER COLORADO RIVER No impacts. Continuation of No impacts. No impacts. No impacts. existing conditions. IID WATER SERVICE AREA AND AAC GS-1: Soil erosion Continuation of A2-GS-1: Soil A3-GS-1: Soil A4-GS-1: Soil from construction existing conditions. erosion from erosion from erosion from of conservation construction of construction of fallowing: Less measures: Less conservation conservation than significant than significant measures: Less measures: Less impact with impact. than significant than significant mitigation. impact. impact. GS-2: Soil erosion Continuation of No impact. A3-GS-2: Soil No impact. from operation of existing conditions. erosion from conservation operation of measures: Less conservation than significant measures: Less impact. than significant impact. GS-3: Reduction Continuation of A2-GS-2: A3-GS-3: No impact. of soil erosion existing conditions. Reduction of soil Reduction of soil from reduction in erosion from erosion from irrigation: reduction in reduction in Beneficial impact. irrigation: irrigation: Beneficial impact. Beneficial impact. GS-4: Ground Continuation of A2-GS-3: Ground A3-GS-4: Ground No impact. acceleration and existing conditions. acceleration and acceleration and shaking: Less than shaking: Less than shaking: Less than significant impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Victoria to Belong to Posterity
    AREA POPULATION 3500 Guatay ................, ............. 200 Jamul ................................ 952 Pine Valley ...................... 956 Campo .............................. 1256 Descan, o ... .. .. .... .. ...... ....... 776 Jacumba ............................ 852 Harbison Canyon ............ 1208 ALPINE ECHO Total .............................. 9273 Serving a Growing Area of Homes and Ranches VOL. 5-NO. 34 ----~- 36 ALPINE, CALIFORNIA, THURSDAY, AUGUST 30, 1962 PRICE TEN CENTS QUEEN VICTORIA TO BELONG TO POSTERITY Local Historical Society Works To Preserve Landmark A good crowd of members and guests assembled Sun­ day, August 26, when the Alpine Historical Society met in the Alpine Woman's Club at 2 p .m. As its first definite project in t he program of locating and preserving authentic historical data of local signifi- cance, the society has started to work on the acquisition of the fa­ Local Schools Lose mous ·old rock, called Queen Vic- toria which stands in the 2700 10 TeaC hterS block on Victoria Hill. Ten cE>rtificated employees have j After a brief discussion, Presi'­ left the Alpine Schools this sprina dent Ralph Walker appointed Or·· for greener pastures in other dis~ ville Palmer, president of the Vic­ tricts with mQ.re attractive sched- toria Hiil Civic Association, as ules. chairman in charge of the rock project. He will work with His­ Frank J<,seph has accepted a full­ torical Research committee chair· time administrative position in the man, Philip Hall. Mr. Palmer has Lawndale School, Los Angeles contacted owner of the rock and County. Mr. Joseph will have site, Edward Roper of San Diego, charge o:f a school with an enroH­ who has expressed willingness to ment of 830 pupils and 23 teach­ deed it to the society for preserva­ ers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest
    MONOGRAPH 44 Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest Source Determination by INAA and Complementary Mineralogical Investigations Edited by Donna M. Glowacki and Hector Neff The Cotsen Institute ofArchaeology University of California, Los Angeles 2002 IO Patayan Ceramic Variability Using Trace Elements and Petrographic Analysis to Study Brown and BuffWares in Southern California john A. Hildebrand, G. Timothy Cross,jerry Schaefer, and Hector Neff N THE LOWER COLORADO RivER and adjacent desert tain a large fraction of granitic inclusions, and when present and upland regions of southern California and in prehistoric pottery, me inclusions may not represent added 0 western Arizona, the late prehistoric Patayan temper but me remnants of incompletely weamered parent produced predominantly undecorated ceramics using a pad­ rock (Shepard 1964). In the lower Colorado River and Salton dle and anvil technique (Colton 1945; Rogers 1945a; Waters Trough regions, alluvial clays are available with a low iron 1982). Patayan ceramic vessels were important to both mixed content, hence their buff color, and which contain little or horticultural economies along the Colorado and adjacent no intrinsic inclusions. In this case, tempering materials may river systems, and to largely hunting and gathering econo­ be purposefully added to the alluvial clays. For the historic mies in the adjacent uplands. Patayan ceramic production Kumeyaay/ Kamia, a Yuman-speaking group known to have began at about AD 700 (Schroeder 1961), and continued into occupied both mountain and desert regions west of the low­ recent times among the Yuman speakers of this region, de­ er Colorado River (Hicks 1963), the same potters may have scendants of the Patayan (Rogers 1936).
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Cultural Resources Survey for the Monte Vista Regional Soccer and Wellness Park Project Imperial County, California
    Results of the Cultural Resources Survey for the Monte Vista Regional Soccer and Wellness Park Project Imperial County, California Prepared for City of El Centro Community Development Department 1275 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 Contact: Norma Villicaña Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92108-5726 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 9781 November 6, 2020 Nathanial Yerka, Project Archaeologist Results of Cultural Resources Survey NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION Author: Nathanial Yerka Consulting Firm: RECON Environmental, Inc. 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92108-5726 Report Date: November 6, 2020 Report Title: Results of the Cultural Resources Survey for the Monte Vista Regional Soccer and Wellness Park Project Imperial County, California Prepared for: City of El Centro Community Development Department 1275 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 Contract Number: RECON Number 9781 USGS Quadrangle Map: El Centro, California, quadrangle, 1979 edition Acreage: 63 acres Keywords: Cultural resources survey, negative prehistoric resources, Date Drain, Dahlia Canal Lateral 1, Imperial Irrigation District, internal canal system This report summarizes the results of the cultural resources field and archival investigation for the Monte Vista Regional Soccer and Wellness Park Project, in the county of Imperial, California. The approximately 80-acre project area is located within the city of El Centro, situated south of West McCabe Road, west of Sperber Road, east and adjacent to a portion of the Dahlia Canal, and approximately 2.5 miles north of the Imperial Valley Irrigation Network’s Main Canal. The assessor’s parcel number for the site is 054-510-001.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Quality Field Inventory
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Scenic Quality Field Inventory Date 8/14/06 District California Desert Field Office El Centro Scenic Quality Rating Unit 01 Viewpoint 1 : State Route 98 Evaluator(s) Michael Clayton LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDFORM / WATER VEGETATION STRUCTURES Flat basin floor, backdropped by Irregular distribution of low growing Linear and complex for the the angular Jacumba Mountains grasses and shrubs transitions to a Form transmission line towers. (not part of the unit). more uniform distribution at distance. Irregular for individual foreground Vertical, horizontal, and shrubs and clumps of grass. Horizontal for the basin floor. diagonal for lattice structures, Line Line Horizontal as defined by the basin curvilinear for the conductors. floor. Tan to pale-yellow and golden Light tan soils. grasses with tanish-gray to green Gray. Color shrubs. Soils in the immediate foreground Medium grain to matte. Smooth. appear smooth to granular. Texture Narrative: SQRU 01 encompasses a portion of the Yuha Desert that generally follows existing transmission line and transportation corridors from the U.S.-Mexico border north to Plaster City and then west to just west of Ocotillo. See Maps 1 and 2 for the complete boundaries of SQRU 01. Viewpoint 1 is representative of many views within SQRU 01, encompassing foreground to middleground flat desert landscape with grass and low-growing shrubs of subdued color and prominent utility infrastructure with complex structural forms and industrial character. Though distant mountain ranges (Jacumba Mountains) to the west provide a limited backdrop of visual interest (not part of this unit), SQRU 01 is primarily influenced by the flat basin landform and the prominent utility infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Legal Document
    Case 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 135 1 DROR LADIN* NOOR ZAFAR* 2 JONATHAN HAFETZ** HINA SHAMSI** 3 OMAR C. JADWAT** AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 4 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 5 Tel.: (212) 549-2500 Fax: (212) 549-2564 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 [email protected] [email protected] 8 [email protected] 9 * Admitted pro hac vice **Application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming 10 CECILLIA D. WANG (SBN 187782) 11 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 39 Drumm Street 12 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 343-0770 13 Fax: (415) 395-0950 [email protected] 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional counsel listed on following page) 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND DIVISION 18 SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER 19 COMMUNITIES COALITION, Case No.: 4:20-cv-01494-HSG 20 Plaintiffs, APPENDIX OF DECLARATIONS IN 21 v. SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 22 DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United JUDGMENT States, in his official capacity; MARK T. ESPER, 23 Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity; and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 24 Security, in his official capacity, Trial Date: None Set Action Filed: February 28, 2020 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ APPENDIX OF DECLARATIONS ISO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO.: 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Case 4:20-cv-01494-HSG Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 135 1 Additional counsel for Plaintiffs: 2 SANJAY NARAYAN (SBN 183227)*** GLORIA D.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Ko-Pah) Wilderness Study Area, Imperial County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area, Imperial County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1711-D Chapter D Mineral Resources of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area, Imperial County, California By VICTORIA R. TODD, JAMES E. KILBURN, DAVID E. DETRA, ANDREW GRISCOM, and FRED A. KRUSE U.S. Geological Survey EDWARD L McHUGH U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1711 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataioging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area, Imperial County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1711-D Bibliography: Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.3:1711-D 1. Mines and mineral resources California Jacumba (In- ko-pah) Wilderness. 2. Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness (Calif.) I. Todd, Victoria R. (Victoria Roy) II. U.S. Geological Survey. III. Series. QE75.B9 No. 1711-D 557.3 s 87-600129 [TN24.C2] [553'.09794'99] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Irrigation District Final EIS/EIR
    Final Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement Imperial Irrigation District Water Conservation and Transfer Project VOLUME 2 of 6 (Section 3.3—Section 9.23) See Volume 1 for Table of Contents Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation Imperial Irrigation District October 2002 155 Grand Avenue Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 SECTION 3.3 Geology and Soils 3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3.3 Geology and Soils 3.3.1 Introduction and Summary Table 3.3-1 summarizes the geology and soils impacts for the Proposed Project and Alternatives. TABLE 3.3-1 Summary of Geology and Soils Impacts1 Alternative 2: 130 KAFY Proposed Project: On-farm Irrigation Alternative 3: 300 KAFY System 230 KAFY Alternative 4: All Conservation Alternative 1: Improvements All Conservation 300 KAFY Measures No Project Only Measures Fallowing Only LOWER COLORADO RIVER No impacts. Continuation of No impacts. No impacts. No impacts. existing conditions. IID WATER SERVICE AREA AND AAC GS-1: Soil erosion Continuation of A2-GS-1: Soil A3-GS-1: Soil A4-GS-1: Soil from construction existing conditions. erosion from erosion from erosion from of conservation construction of construction of fallowing: Less measures: Less conservation conservation than significant than significant measures: Less measures: Less impact with impact. than significant than significant mitigation. impact. impact. GS-2: Soil erosion Continuation of No impact. A3-GS-2: Soil No impact. from operation of existing conditions. erosion from conservation operation of measures: Less conservation than significant measures: Less impact. than significant impact. GS-3: Reduction Continuation of A2-GS-2: A3-GS-3: No impact. of soil erosion existing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2016-17 Annual Report
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PENINSULAR BIGHORN SHEEP 2016-17 ANNUAL REPORT Photo By Jeff Young This report presents information on the status, distribution, and management of peninsular bighorn sheep from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2017 Authors Janene Colby and Randy Botta South Coast Region California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Annual Report 2016-17 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………….....1 Background……………………………………………………….........3 Population Size and Estimation………………………….……..3 Radio-Collar Status………………………………………………...…5 Cause-Specific Mortality and Survival………………………..5 Lamb Survival and Recruitment……………………………….10 Distribution and Movement…………………………………….12 San Jacinto Mountains………………………………..…….…...12 Northern Santa Rosa Mountains…………………...…...12 Central Santa Rosa Mountains………………………...........13 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains………………………....... 14 Coyote Canyon……….………………………………………........15 Northern San Ysidro Mountains…………………...….…15 Southern San Ysidro Mountains……………..…….…….16 Vallecito Mountains…………..………………………….…...17 Carrizo Canyon…………………………………………….….….18 Threats to Recovery…………………………………….……..…..19 San Jacinto Mountains…………………………..................19 Northern Santa Rosa Mountains……………………………....19 Central Santa Rosa Mountains………………….……....…..19 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains…………………….…...…21 Coyote Canyon…………………………………………….….…...21 Northern San Ysidro Mountains…………………..….……..22 Southern San Ysidro Mountains……………………….…....22 Vallecito Mountains…………………………………………..….22 Carrizo Canyon……………………………………………..….…..23
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Report
    Results of Cultural Resources Survey of the Dogwood Road at Villa Avenue Project, Imperial County, California Prepared for City of El Centro Community Development Department 1275 Main Street Imperial County, California Contact: Norma Villicaña Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 8757 August 18, 2017 Harry J. Price, Principal Investigator Results of Cultural Resources Survey NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION Author: Harry J. Price Consulting Firm: RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101-2358 Report Date: August 11, 2017 Report Title: Results of Cultural Resources Survey of the Dogwood Road at Villa Avenue Project, Imperial County, California Prepared for: City of El Centro Community Development Department 1275 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 Contract Number: RECON Number 8757 USGS Quadrangle Map: El Centro California, quadrangle, 1979 edition Acreage: 330 acres Keywords: Cultural resources survey, negative prehistoric resources, Dogwood Canal, Central 3 Drain, Imperial Irrigation District, internal canal system, Holton Interurban Railroad This report summarizes the results of the cultural resources field and archival investigation of the Dogwood Road at Villa Avenue Project (project) site, in the County of Imperial, California. The approximately 330-acre project site is located south of East Villa Road, west of Cooley Road, east of North Dogwood Street, and north of the Holton Interurban Railroad. The site is currently located within the County of Imperial (County) and is directly adjacent to the City of El Centro (City). The Assessor’s Parcel Number for the site is 044-450-038. A records search was conducted of the archaeological databases maintained at the California Historical Resources Information System, South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University.
    [Show full text]
  • 240 Years of Ranching Historical Research, Field Surveys, Oral
    240 Years of Ranching Historical Research, Field Surveys, Oral Interviews, Significance Criteria, and Management Recommendations for Ranching Districts and Sites in the San Diego Region By Sue A. Wade Stephen R. Van Wormer Heather Thomson September 8, 2009 i ABSTRACT Livestock have grazed on the grasslands of Southern California from the time the first Europeans arrived in the 1700s until the present day. Within a few years of the establishment of the first Spanish missions, thousands of horses, cattle, and sheep grazed on the coastal mesas, inland valleys, and mountain foothills. After the Mexican revolution in 1821 and the subsequent secularization of the missions, the California rancheros continued raising livestock on the open range. Thus, during the Spanish and Mexican periods, from the 1770s until the 1840s, the base economy of California depended on open-range cattle. During this time, cattle were primarily raised for their hides, some used locally, but the majority brought by the thousands to the coastal ports and traded to Americans for transport to the United States East Coast. After the American takeover of California in 1848 and the discovery of gold in Northern California the following year, the cattle industry continued to prosper by producing meat to feed the thousands of emigrants and gold-rushers in Northern California. Although impacted by droughts in the 1860s, the cattle meat industry continued to be viable until the 1880s. In the late nineteenth century, as a result of the rampant promotion of Southern California by land speculators and several years of exceptional rains that supported dry-land farming, much of the prime agricultural land of Southern California was homesteaded by American farming families.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description, Location, and Environmental Setting
    1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING CHAPTER 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1.1 Project Objectives Jacumba Solar LLC (the applicant) proposes to develop, finance, construct, and operate a solar energy facility in southeastern San Diego County. For purposes of this draft environmental impact report (EIR), the Jacumba Solar Energy Project will be referred to as the “Jacumba Solar Energy Project” or the “Proposed Project.” Currently, the applicant is seeking project-level approvals for the Jacumba Solar Energy Project, which will be analyzed at a project level of detail in this EIR. Specific objectives for the Proposed Project are as follows: 1. Develop approximately 20 megawatts (MW) of renewable solar energy that can operate during on-peak power periods to indirectly reduce the need to emit greenhouse gases (GHGs) caused by the generation of similar quantities of electricity from either existing or future non-renewable sources to meet existing and future electricity demands. 2. Develop a solar energy project that can meet the criteria to achieve the maximum federal solar Investment Tax Credit which is intended to decrease the cost of renewable energy generation and delivery, promote the diversity of energy supply, decrease dependence of the United States on foreign energy supplies and improve United States security. 3. Balance the development of the solar energy facility with the protection of resources, which may include preservation of on-site biological and cultural resources and the establishment of a wildlife movement corridor. 4. Develop a utility-scale solar energy project that improves local electrical reliability for the San Diego region by providing a source of local generation as near as possible to the East County (ECO) Substation and other recent regional transmission improvements.
    [Show full text]