DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF: Section 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF: Section 4 Section 4 Public Accounts of Canada 2018–2019 Acquisition of land, buildings and works Table of contents Page Agriculture and Agri-Food ................................................................ 2 Canadian Heritage and Multiculturalism ....................................... 4 Crown-Indigenous Relations ......................................................... 4 Democratic Institutions ................................................................. 4 Environment and Climate Change ................................................. 5 Finance ............................................................................... 19 Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard ............................. 19 Global Affairs ............................................................................... 26 Health ................................................................................. 27 Indigenous Services .......................................................................... 28 Infrastructure and Communities ........................................................ 28 Innovation, Science and Economic Development ............................. 28 Justice ................................................................................. 30 National Defence .......................................................................... 31 Natural Resources ......................................................................... 46 Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness ..................................... 48 Public Services and Procurement ...................................................... 57 Sciences ........................................................................................ 59 Transport ................................................................................. 59 Treasury Board ............................................................................. 62 Veterans Affairs ........................................................................... 62 Name and location of contractor with brief description and province of project Amount 2018-2019 Expenditures (in dollars) Contracted Expenditures to date Agriculture and Agri-Food Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food 4089171 Canada Inc, Ottawa, Ontario 2 Renovations of room 2048-2050, building 20, Ottawa, Ontario........................................... 390,000 390,000 390,000 Allen & Bolack Excavating Ltd, Brandon, Manitoba 2 Watermain replacement, Brandon research and development centre, Brandon, Manitoba. 1,563,187 1,563,187 1,563,187 Architecture49 Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba Architectural and engineering services for research centre rehabilitation project, Swift 1 2 Current, Saskatchewan........................................................................................................ 4,509,204 488,385 4,390,522 Associated Engineering, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 2 Architectural and engineering services for watermain replacement, Brandon, Manitoba..... 262,274 193,360 247,360 Atlantica Mechanical Contractors Inc, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Heating ventilation and air conditioning systems and control systems upgrade, Kentville, 2 f Nova Scotia.......................................................................................................................... 2,106,123 0 2,106,123 Bähler Biogaz Inc, Sherbrooke, Quebec Supply and installation of a bioreactor, Sherbrooke research and development centre, 2 Sherbrooke, Quebec............................................................................................................ 969,932 937,498 937,498 Bisson Fortin Architecture + Design Inc, Laval, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for roofs refection of the main building, Saint- 1 2 Hyacinthe, Quebec............................................................................................................... 305,260 193,818 226,929 Boald Construction Management Ltd, Edmonton, Alberta 2 Beef feedlot water renovation and expansion, Lacombe, Alberta........................................ 802,816 4,481 794,748 Bradford M Hubbard Construction Inc, Spencerville, Ontario 2 Building 54 envelope conservation, Ottawa, Ontario........................................................... 730,134 0 699,355 Chandos Construction LP, Calgary, Alberta Lethbridge research and development centre laboratory annex exterior envelope 2 replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta......................................................................................... 3,544,080 1,909,175 3,544,080 Chandos Construction LP, Calgary, Alberta 2 New Lacombe abattoir, Lacombe, Alberta........................................................................... 12,082,800 36,532 148,641 Construction Bugère Inc, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec 2 Roofs refection of the main building, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec........................................... 1,133,014 659,162 659,162 Controlled Environments Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 Growth chamber replacement, London, Ontario.................................................................. 906,345 0 858,696 Controlled Environments Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 f Growth chambers replacement, Québec, Quebec............................................................... 1,010,895 201,250 1,010,895 Controlled Environments Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 New growth chambers, Summerland, British Columbia....................................................... 3,180,285 0 3,177,409 Cougar Engineering & Construction Ltd, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador Sanitary sewer upgrades, St John's research and development centre, St John's, 2 Newfoundland and Labrador................................................................................................ 963,875 963,875 963,875 Defran Inc, Gatineau, Quebec Saunders renovation, building 49, Ottawa, Ontario............................................................. 267,324 171,592 171,592 Energy Network Services Inc, Richmond Hill, Ontario 2 f Lightning retrofit, Kentville, Nova Scotia.............................................................................. 517,723 517,723 517,723 Finn Construction Ltd, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 2 f Rehabilitation of Highfield dam, Rush Lake, Saskatchewan................................................ 1,580,865 0 1,223,608 Fournier Gersovitz Moss Drolet & Associés Architectes, Montréal, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for building 54 envelope conservation, Ottawa, 2 Ontario.................................................................................................................................. 502,624 0 467,837 Ful-Flo Industries Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 f Irrigation development, Brandon, Manitoba......................................................................... 2,360,082 0 2,360,082 FWBA Architects, Lethbridge, Alberta 2 Lab annex exterior envelope replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta........................................... 270,610 70,717 237,203 G Hahn Contracting Ltd, Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan Pesticide and chemical storage facility, Indian Head research farm, Indian Head, 2 Saskatchewan....................................................................................................................... 877,329 837,541 837,541 Gagnon Letellier Cyr Ricard Mathieu & Associés Architectes, Québec, Quebec Architectural and engineering services for research greenhouse reconstruction, Québec, 1 2 Quebec................................................................................................................................. 783,952 19,219 779,500 Acquisition of Land, Buildings and Works - 3 - Public Accounts of Canada, 2018-2019 Name and location of contractor with brief description and province of project Amount 2018-2019 Expenditures (in dollars) Contracted Expenditures to date GNR Corbus Inc, Sherbrooke, Quebec Major renovations of the hydraulic heating and cooling networks, phase 2, Sherbrooke, 2 f Quebec................................................................................................................................. 2,370,759 0 2,370,759 Groupe Symaco Inc, Québec, Quebec f Dust collector and air exhaust system replacement, Québec, Quebec............................... 346,886 9,493 346,886 Groupe Symaco Inc, Québec, Quebec 2 f Replacement of growth chambers, Québec, Quebec.......................................................... 582,210 345,094 582,210 Gulf Developments Inc, Maidstone, Ontario 2 f Harrow research centre greenhouse construction, Harrow, Ontario.................................... 2,977,424 20,000 2,977,424 HDK Consulting Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 f Crop services building, Brandon, Manitoba......................................................................... 347,509 0 343,658 HFKS Architects Inc, Calgary, Alberta 2 f Lab block building exterior envelope replacement, Lethbridge, Alberta............................... 283,863 0 283,863 JP Gravel Construction Inc, Ottawa, Ontario 2 Renovation of laboratory 1007-1024, building 20, Ottawa, Ontario..................................... 469,299 469,299 469,299 Kontzamanis Graumann Smith MacMillan Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba 2 Architectural and engineering services for greenhouse expansion, Morden, Manitoba....... 293,691 0 289,133 Les Constructions Béland & Lapointe Inc, Lévis, Quebec 2 Research greenhouse reconstruction, Québec, Quebec..................................................... 4,176,616 0 4,176,616 MacLean Construction Ltd, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island 2 f Lab renovations, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Place-Names in and Around the Fleet Valley ==== D ==== Daffin Daffin Is a Farm at the Head of the Cleugh of Doon Above Carsluith
    Place-names in and around the Fleet Valley ==== D ==== Daffin Daffin is a farm at the head of the Cleugh of Doon above Carsluith. There is a Daffin Tree marked on the 1st edition OS map at Killochy in Balmaclellan parish, and Daffin Hill in this location on current OS maps, across the Dee from Kenmure Castle; Castle Daffin is a hill in Parton parish and a house by Auchencairn. This is likely to be Gaelic *Dà pheiginn ‘two pennylands’. Peighinn is ‘a penny’, but in place-names it refers to a unit of land, based on yield rather than area. It probably originated in the Gaelic-Norse context of Argyll and the southern Hebrides, and was introduced into the south-west by the Gall- Ghàidheil (see Ardwell above). It occurs in place-names in Galloway and, especially, Carrick as ‘Pin- ‘ as first element, ‘-fin’ with ‘softened ‘ph’ after a numeral or other pre-positioned adjective. Originally a pennyland was a relatively small division of a davoch (dabhach, see Cullendoch above), but in the south-west places whose names contain this element appear in mediaeval records as holdings of relatively substantial landowners, comprising good extents of pasture, meadow and woodland as well as the arable core, and yielding much higher taxes than the pennylands further north. Indeed, peighinn may have come to be used more generally in the region for a fairly substantial estate without implying a specific valuation. *Dà pheiginn ‘two pennylands’ would, then, have been a large and productive landholding. However, a Scots origin is also possible, or if the origin was Gaelic, reinterpretation by Scots speakers is possible: daffin or daffen is a Scots word for ‘daffodil’, but as a verb, daffin(g) is ‘playing daft, larking about’.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • September-November—2012 Saturday October 6, 2012 Santanoni Farm Newcomb a Short Walk of Just Over a Mile Will Bring Us to the Farm Complex on the Santanoni Preserve
    Northern New York Audubon Serving the Adirondack, Champlain, St.Lawrence Region of New York State Mission: To conserve and restore natural ecosystems in the Adirondacks, focusing on birds, other wildlife, and their habitats for the benefit of humanity and the Earth's biological diversity. Volume 40 Number 3 September-November—2012 Saturday October 6, 2012 Santanoni Farm Newcomb A short walk of just over a mile will bring us to the farm complex on the Santanoni Preserve. The 12,500 acre preserve is home to the Santanoni Lodge, built from 1892-93. While we won't be hiking the 4 miles into the Lodge, there are some old buildings at the farm including a beautiful creamery and some great old fields and orchards that we can explore. After the hike, participants can visit the Gatehouse Moose River Plains building that houses a small museum with photos and information about the history 1 Santanoni Farm—Field Trip and renovation efforts at the Lodge. 1 MassawepieArbutus Lake—Field Mire Trip Time: 9 a.m. Meet: At the Adirondack Interpretive Center, 5922 St Rte 28N Newcomb, NY 2 Westport Boat Launch Leader: Charlotte Demers 2 CoonWestport/Essex—Field Mountain Trip Registration: Email to [email protected] or call the AIC at (518) 582-2000 Azure Mountain—Field Trip Saturday, November 3, 2012 2 Wilson Hill to Robert Moses State Arbutus Lake 3 Park—LouisvilleNABA’s Lake Placid & Massena Butterfly (St.Count Lawrence County) Newcomb Participants will hike a 2 mile loop around the shore of Arbutus Lake in the Hunt- President’s Message ington Wildlife Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 26(1-2)
    Beaver Creek Institution Anonymous Prisoner 11 he reason I am contributing to this Dialogue on penal reform in Canada Tis because I am in my sixties and my crime was an isolated incident, resulting in a sentence for second degree murder in the 1990s. I did 15 years inside as a model prisoner and was paroled in 2008 to a halfway house. Once there, I spent two years in the community without incident and was subsequently given full parole. However, in 2013, I was revoked for a negative urine sample. I have been back inside since, incurring unnecessary costs to taxpayers as my breach did not constitute a danger or threat to the public. Prior to my incarceration, I was never a burden on society. With several skilled trades under my belt, I owned a home and business. Ever since Harper’s ‘tough on crime’ and ‘life means life’ approach to imprisonment, a lot of us Lifers were revoked with no new criminal charges and with no help from our parole offi cers. This leaves us with no light at the end of the tunnel. There should be a time limit that restricts revoking parolees who have committed no new crimes once they have completed a signifi cant portion of time under supervised release. 147 Beaver Creek Institution Anonymous Prisoners aving served more than a decade in federal penitentiaries, I have seen Hmany things change for the worse. Below, is a list of recommendations that a number of us at Beaver Creek Minimums who meet regularly to discuss how we can atone for our actions with our victims and communities compiled during one of our meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action News Issue #18 Summer 2020
    - 1 - 2 > CAN-#18 < Editor’s Note > < Contents > It is Summer & Issue #18 News …………………………... 3-12 of ‘Class Action News’. Health & Harm Reduction …..…... 13 This magazine is by & for Resources ………….……….... 14-16 the Prisoner Class in Canada. < Artists in this Issue > In every Issue we provide a safe space for creative expression and literacy development. Cover: Pete Collins These zines feature art, poetry, stories, news, observations, concerns, and anything of interest to share. Health & Harm Reduction info will always be provided - Yes, Be Safe! Quality & Quantity: Items printed are those that are common for diverse readers, so no religious items please. < Funding for this Issue > Artwork: Black pen (tat-style) works the best. Cover Artist will receive a $25 donation. Very special thanks to: Writings: only short poems, news, stories, … Groundswell Community Justice Trust Fund! Items selected are those that fit nicely & allow space for others (½ page = 325 words max). < Ancestral Territorial Acknowledgment > For author protection, letters & story credits will all be 'Anonymous'. We respectfully acknowledge that the land on which Prison Free Press operates is the ‘Class Action News' is published 4 times a Traditional Territory of the Wendat, the year & is free for prisoners in Canada. Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, and the If you are on the outside or an organization, Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation. please send a donation. We do not have any funding so it really helps to get this inside! e ‘Dish With One Spoon’ Treaty f Editor: Tom Jackson Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms Publication: Class Action News Publisher: PrisonFreePress.org • The right of life, liberty and security of person PO Box 39, Stn P (Section 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization Theory and the Canadian Construction of Omar Khadr
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-05-18 Securitization Theory and the Canadian Construction of Omar Khadr Pirnie, Elizabeth Irene Pirnie, E. I. (2018). Securitization Theory and the Canadian Construction of Omar Khadr (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/31940 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/106673 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Securitization Theory and the Canadian Construction of Omar Khadr by Elizabeth Irene Pirnie A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA May, 2018 © Elizabeth Irene Pirnie 2018 ii Abstract While the provision of security and protection to its citizens is one way in which sovereign states have historically claimed legitimacy (Nyers, 2004: 204), critical security analysts point to security at the level of the individual and how governance of a nation’s security underscores the state’s inherently paradoxical relationship to its citizens. Just as the state may signify the legal and institutional structures that delimit a certain territory and provide and enforce the obligations and prerogatives of citizenship, the state can equally serve to expel and suspend modes of legal protection and obligation for some (Butler and Spivak, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Spill Probability Analysis
    Hudson River Oil Spill Risk Assessment Volume 3: Oil Spill Probability Analysis Prepared for Scenic Hudson, Inc. One Civic Center Plaza Suite 200 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-3157 Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 Deborah French McCay, PhD Jill Rowe and Deborah Crowley RPS 55 Village Square Drive South Kingstown, RI 02879-8248 John Joeckel SEAConsult LLC P. O. Box 243 Wachapreague, VA 23310-0243 Andy Wolford, PhD Risknology, Inc. 3218 Quiet Lake Drive Katy, TX 77450-5721 May 2018 Acknowledgments This project was commissioned by Scenic Hudson, Inc., of Poughkeepsie, New York, under a Professional Services Contract with Environmental Research Consulting (ERC). RPS ASA, SEAConsult LLC, and Risknology, Inc., were all subcontractors to ERC under separate contracts. The HROSRA research team acknowledges the invaluable inputs and discussions with Scenic Hudson over the course of the study period (September 2017 through May 2018), including the selection and development of the hypothetical spill scenarios. The contents of the report, data, analyses, findings, and conclusions are solely the responsibility of the research team and do not constitute any official position by Scenic Hudson. The Hudson River Oil Spill Risk Assessment was conducted as an independent, objective, technical analysis without any particular agenda or viewpoint except to provide quantitative and qualitative information that could be used to work to a common goal of spill prevention and preparedness. The study is intended to inform officials, decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public about oil spill risk in the Hudson River. The diligent efforts of the RPS SIMAP modeling team of Jenna Ducharme, Matt Frediani, Deborah Crowley, Emily Skeehan, and Matt Bernardo provided the necessary data, results, maps, and graphics that formed the foundation of much of the analysis in the HROSRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawbridge, Portcullis, Battlements, Moat, Gatehouse, Curtain Wall, Tower, Arrow Slits
    Otter Class 8.6.20 Hello Otter Class! I hope you have had a nice week. I can’t believe it is June already! We have a brand new topic..Castles! Here are some ideas to start you off on our new topic! 1) Make a list of everything you know about castles. What were theyfor? Who lived in castles? Do you know the names of any famous castles? 2) Write some questions. What do you want to find out about castles? Remember all your special question words (who/why/when etc) and don’t forget your question mark... 3) Word challenge...what do these words mean? Drawbridge, portcullis, battlements, moat, gatehouse, curtain wall, tower, arrow slits... You could look in a book or search on the internet. You could write a definition for each word (what it means) to make a castle word glossary (a tricky word list) You could even draw a picture to go with each word or print one out. You might discover some other castle words too! 4) Design your own castle and draw a picture. Label it with some of the words from above. What is your castle called? Who lives in it? You could even make a model of your castle. You could use recycled materials or Lego or think of a different way to make your model. These castles might give you some ideas when you design your own! 1) Reading ideas Remember to keep on reading! It could be a story or non fiction book about minibeast or anything you like! You could do some cooking with your grown up and help read the recipe/instructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Castle – Gatehouse, Inner Barrier, Old Guardhouse
    Property in Care (PIC) no :PIC222 Designations: Listed Building (LB48218) Taken into State care: 1906 (Ownership) Last reviewed: 2012 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE EDINBURGH CASTLE – GATEHOUSE, INNER BARRIER, OLD GUARDHOUSE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH EDINBURGH CASTLE – GATEHOUSE, INNER BARRIER AND OLD GUARDHOUSE BRIEF DESCRIPTION The present Gatehouse, built in 1886–88, is the latest in a series of main entrances into the castle. Replacing a far simpler gate, the Victorian structure was seen as a bold intervention at the time. It is surrounded by a number of lesser constructions; the oldest, including the Inner Barrier, date from the later 17th century, and the latest, the ticket office, was constructed as recently as 2008. Archaeological investigations in the area in 1989, in advance of creating the vehicle tunnel through the castle rock, uncovered evidence for two massive Iron Age ditches in the area. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview Late 1st millennium BC: Two massive ditches are dug on the east side of the castle rock, presumably as part of a scheme to upgrade the defences of the prehistoric fort. The ditches are still serving a defensive function into the 14th century. 1649/50: The ‘forte of the castell hill’, or Spur, built in 1548 on the site of the present Esplanade, is dismantled and removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions Clubs International Club Membership Register
    LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL CLUB MEMBERSHIP REGISTER CLUB MMR MMR FCL YR MEMBERSHI P CHANGES TOTAL IDENT CLUB NAME DIST TYPE NBR RPT DATE RCV DATE OB NEW RENST TRANS DROPS NETCG MEMBERS 3935 019739 BEDFORD 105 A 1 07-2003 10-24-2003 3935 019739 BEDFORD 105 A 1 08-2003 09-22-2003 -1 -1 3935 019739 BEDFORD 105 A 1 09-2003 10-23-2003 27 0 0 0 -1 -1 26 3935 019750 HARROW 105 A 1 07-2003 08-04-2003 -2 -2 3935 019750 HARROW 105 A 1 08-2003 09-02-2003 3935 019750 HARROW 105 A 1 09-2003 10-01-2003 24 0 0 0 -2 -2 22 3935 019751 HAYES HARLINGTON 105 A 1 07-2003 08-22-2003 3935 019751 HAYES HARLINGTON 105 A 1 08-2003 09-22-2003 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 3935 019752 HEMEL HEMPSTEAD 105 A 1 08-2003 08-28-2003 3935 019752 HEMEL HEMPSTEAD 105 A 1 09-2003 09-29-2003 -2 -2 12 0 0 0 -2 -2 10 3935 019753 HERTFORD 105 A 1 07-2003 08-22-2003 3935 019753 HERTFORD 105 A 1 08-2003 09-22-2003 3935 019753 HERTFORD 105 A 1 09-2003 10-23-2003 16 0 0 0 0 0 16 3935 019754 UXBRIDGE HILLINGDON 105 A 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 3935 019755 HITCHIN 105 A 1 07-2003 08-21-2003 -2 -2 3935 019755 HITCHIN 105 A 1 08-2003 09-01-2003 3935 019755 HITCHIN 105 A 1 09-2003 09-29-2003 14 0 0 0 -2 -2 12 3935 019756 HOUNSLOW 105 A 1 07-2003 10-11-2003 3935 019756 HOUNSLOW 105 A 1 09-2003 10-11-2003 3935 019756 HOUNSLOW 105 A 1 09-2003 10-11-2003 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 3935 019759 LEIGHTON BUZZARD 105 A 9 06-2003 08-20-2003 3935 019759 LEIGHTON BUZZARD 105 A 1 08-2003 08-26-2003 3935 019759 LEIGHTON BUZZARD 105 A 9 08-2003 08-26-2003 Report Types: 1 - MMR 2 - Roster 4 - Charter Report 6 - MMR w/ Roster 7 - Correspondence
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Parliament Through the Solicitor General
    The Sub-Committee on the Penitentiary System in Canada Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs Mark MacGuigan Chairman Second Session of the Thirtieth Parliament, 1976-77 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1977 Available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A 059 or through your bookseller. Catalogue No. XC33-302/2-45-1 Canada: $3.50 ISBN 0-660-01096-8 Other countries: $4.20 Price subject to change without notice. SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM IN CANADA Chairman. Mark MacGuigan Vice-Chairman.: Yvon Pinard Members of the Sub-Committee Leonel Beaudoin Arthur Lee Bruce Halliday Stuart Leggatt Maurice Harquail Erik Nielsen Simms Holt John Reynolds Claude-Andre Lachance W. Kenneth Robinson Jacques Lavoie Staff Denis Beaudoin Jean-Marie Mercier Dr. B. A. Boyd John Moloney Wayne Cameron Robert Normand George Fife Moe Royer Hugh Finsten Edward F. Ryan Virginia Kuash Rick Steele Louanne Labelle Sharon Vance Robert Vaive Mary Anne Griffith Clerk of the Sub-Committee 1; 1 To carry out an extensive—and intensive—study of the Canadian penitentiary system from coast to coast and to put together a Report of this magnitude in the short space of seven months is a task that could have been carried out only by a committee that acted with one mind, and then only with the aid of a staff of exceptional talent and industry. Six members of the research staff of twelve were loaned to the Sub-Committee by the research bureaus of the four political parties, four more were made available by the Research Branch of the Library of Parliament, and one was supplied by the Law Reform Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact Off Crusader Castles Upon European Western Castles
    THE IMPACT OF CRUSADER CASTLES UPON EUROPEAN WESTERN CASTLES IN THE MIDDLE AGES JORDAN HAMPE MAY 2009 A SENIOR PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- LA CROSSE Abstract: During the Middle Ages, the period from roughly AD 1000-1450, the structure of castles changed greatly from wooden motte and bailey to stone keeps and defenses within stone city walls. The reason for the change was largely influenced by the crusades as Europeans went to the Holy Lands to conquer. In addition to conquering, these kings brought back a new way of designing and fortifying their castles in England, Wales and France. Without the influence of the crusades, what we think of as true middle age castles would not exist. For my paper I will analyze the impact the crusades had on forming the middle age castles by evidence surviving in the archaeological record from before and after the crusades as well as modifications done on castles to accommodate crusader changes to show the drastic influence of crusader castle fortifications upon English, Welsh and French castles. 1 Introduction Construction of what is believed to be true middle age castles from A.D. 1000 to 1450 began as kings arrived back from the crusades to the Holy Lands, bringing with them ideas of how to make their castles grander and more easily defensible. Before the crusades William I of England was beginning to develop a new concentric style of castle beginning with the Tower of London. After the crusades many English, Welsh and French kings took the concentric concept and combined it with what they saw on the crusades and developed it to become majestic castles and fortresses like Chateau Gaillard in France, Dover Castle in England, and Caernarvon Castle in Wales.
    [Show full text]