Congressional Record—House H6757

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H6757 June 20, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H6757 Board of Visitors to the United States I would ask the chairman if he would ADERHOLT to restore funding for the Air Force Academy: work with Mr. LIPINSKI, the gentleman ARC, Appalachian Regional Commis- Mr. DEFAZIO, Oregon from Illinois, and me to provide fund- sion, to $65 million in this bill. This Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ, California ing for the H-Prize as we move forward amendment brings the Commission’s Mr. LAMBORN, Colorado in conference with the Senate. funding up so that it’s equal to the f Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Chairman, I ap- President’s request in the previous preciate the gentleman and Mr. LIPIN- year’s funding level. ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOP- SKI’s request for funding for this very The Appalachian Regional Commis- MENT AND RELATED AGENCIES worthwhile program, and certainly sion is very important to my district APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008 look forward to working with him as and many other districts from New The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- well as the gentleman from Illinois as York to Mississippi. The Appalachian ant to House Resolution 481 and rule we go to conference. Regional Commission is a model for XVIII, the Chair declares the House in Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina. I Federal economic development initia- the Committee of the Whole House on thank the gentleman. tives, and has been a responsible stew- the state of the Union for the further The Acting CHAIRMAN. The Clerk ard of the Federal funds it has received consideration of the bill, H.R. 2641. will read. over the years. For example, in fiscal b 1248 The Clerk read as follows: year 2006, across all investment areas, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION each dollar of ARC funding was IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS) matched by $3.14 in non-ARC public Accordingly, the House resolved For salaries and expenses of the Depart- project funding, and each ARC dollar itself into the Committee of the Whole ment of Energy necessary for departmental invested leveraged $11.55 in private in- House on the state of the Union for the administration in carrying out the purposes vestment in ARC projects over time. further consideration of the bill (H.R. of the Department of Energy Organization This restoration of funds will be offset 2641) making appropriations for energy Act (42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), including the hire by a $30 million reduction to the De- and water development and related of passenger motor vehicles and official re- partment of Energy’s administrative ception and representation expenses not to agencies for the fiscal year ending Sep- account. tember 30, 2008, and for other purposes, exceed $5,000, $304,782,000, to remain available until expended, of which $2,390,000 shall be I understand that the Appropriations with Mr. LYNCH (Acting Chairman) in available for necessary administrative ex- Committee must make difficult deci- the chair. penses to carry out the loan guarantee pro- sions this year. However, over the last The Clerk read the title of the bill. gram under title XVII of Public Law 109–58, 10 years, funding for the ARC has re- The Acting CHAIRMAN. When the plus such additional amounts as necessary to mained level, at around $65 million, Committee of the Whole rose on Tues- cover increases in the estimated amount of and the region continues to receive less day, June 19, 2007, amendment No. 19 cost of work for others notwithstanding the Federal assistance per capita than the offered by the gentleman from Min- provisions of the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 rest of the country. Additionally, the U.S.C. 1511 et seq.): Provided, That such in- nesota (Mr. KLINE) had been disposed of House of Representatives had voted to and the bill had been read through page creases in cost of work are offset by revenue increases of the same or greater amount, to authorize the ARC at levels much high- 25, line 6. remain available until expended: Provided er than $65 million. Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Chairman, I further, That moneys received by the Depart- The 410-county region still faces a move to strike the last word. ment for miscellaneous revenues estimated complex set of economic and social The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gen- to total $161,818,000 in fiscal year 2008 may be challenges, and will need continued tleman is recognized for 5 minutes. retained and used for operating expenses support from Congress. Without basic Mr. VISCLOSKY. I would like to use within this account, and may remain avail- infrastructure, economic development my time and recognize the gentleman able until expended, as authorized by section 201 of Public Law 95–238, notwithstanding the and improvements in the overall qual- from South Carolina for a colloquy. ity of life, the Appalachian region will Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina. I provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3302: Provided further, That fees collected pursuant to section continue to lag well behind the rest of thank the gentleman for yielding. 1702(h) of Public Law 109–58 shall be credited the Nation. Mr. Chairman, I thank you and the as offsetting collections to this account: Pro- I ask my colleagues to support this ranking member for your work on this vided further, That the sum herein appro- bipartisan amendment to restore fund- bill. priated shall be reduced by the amount of ing for the commission to levels equal Two weeks ago the House passed the miscellaneous revenues received during 2008, with the President’s request and the H-Prize Act of 2007. The H-Prize was and any related appropriated receipt account current funding level for this program. balances remaining from prior years’ mis- overwhelmingly supported here in the Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield 2 House with a vote of 408–8, and last cellaneous revenues, so as to result in a final fiscal year 2008 appropriation from the gen- minutes to the gentleman from Ala- year 416–6. The H-Prize is a nonbureau- eral fund estimated at not more than bama (Mr. ADERHOLT). cratic way for government to achieve $142,964,000. Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, I its goal of harnessing America’s entre- AMENDMENT NO. 4 OFFERED BY MR. SPACE rise today in support of Congressman preneurial spirit to tackle our energy Mr. SPACE. Mr. Chairman, I offer an SPACE’s amendment, which is of course challenges. The best part is, if no one amendment. funding for the ARC, Appalachian Re- wins the government doesn’t have to The Acting CHAIRMAN. The Clerk gional Commission, in this year’s En- pay. will designate the amendment. ergy and Water appropriations bill. We need $6 million, Mr. Chairman, to The text of the amendment is as fol- Many Americans may not be aware fund the H-Prize at its inception. Of lows: that this was a program that was es- that amount, $1 million would be used Amendment No. 4 offered by Mr. SPACE: tablished back in 1965. ARC was cre- to fund a prize for advancements in Page 25, line 14, after the second dollar ated to address the persistent poverty components or systems related to hy- amount insert ‘‘(reduced by $30,000,000)’’. and the growing economic despair of drogen storage, $4 million would be Page 37, line 19, after the dollar amount in- the Appalachian region, which is an used to fund a prize for development of sert ‘‘(increase by $30,000,000)’’. area that extends from southern New prototypes of hydrogen-powered vehi- The Acting CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to York to northeast Mississippi. At that cles or other hydrogen-based products, the order of the House of Tuesday, time in 1965, one out of every three Ap- and $1 million would be used for admin- June 19, 2007, the gentleman from Ohio palachians lived in poverty. Per capita istration of the prize competitions. (Mr. SPACE) and a Member opposed income was 23 percent lower than the The Secretary of Energy was granted each will control 5 minutes. U.S. average, and high unemployment authorization for creating prizes in the The chairman recognizes the gen- and harsh living conditions had, in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The H-Prize tleman from Ohio. 1950s, forced more than 2 million people gives structure to this prize authority Mr. SPACE. Mr. Chairman, I yield in that area to leave their homes and in accordance with recommendations myself 2 minutes. seek work in other regions. from industry, academia, government Mr. Chairman, I am offering this bi- Even today, ongoing changes in de- and venture capitalists. partisan amendment with Congressman clining sectors of the economy, such as VerDate Mar 15 2010 15:29 Jun 29, 2011 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\ERIC\H20JN7.REC H20JN7 rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS H6758 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 20, 2007 manufacturing and textiles, exacer- erty. And the ARC is a major part of putting it at last year’s enacted level. bated by globalization, changes in continuing to address these challenges The bill provides a 10 percent increase technology, and the recent downturn in in my district and across the region. for DOE’s Departmental Administra- the economy have hit this region very, Now is not the time to cut ARC fund- tion account. very hard. It has threatened to reverse ing. This amendment will simply bring There has been at least $105.5 billion a lot of the economic gains that were ARC funds back up to last year’s level in new Federal spending over the next made in these communities over the and the President’s requested level of 5 years authorized by the House Demo- past several years.
Recommended publications
  • Transcanada Pipelines Limited Annual Information Form
    TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM February 23, 2009 TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION..................................................................................................................................................ii FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION..............................................................................................................................................ii TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED............................................................................................................................................... 1 Corporate Structure ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Intercorporate Relationships............................................................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS .............................................................................................................................. 2 Developments in the Pipelines Business............................................................................................................................................. 2 Developments in the Energy Business...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas the Composition of Natural Gas Is 95% Methane, Almost
    Natural gas The composition of natural gas is 95% methane, almost 4% ethane and nitrogen, and 1% carbon dioxide and propane. It is produced by the natural transformation of organic materials over millions of years. Methane: the simplest hydrocarbon Methane gas belongs to the hydrocarbon family. A hydrocarbon is an organic composition that contains only carbon and hydrogen atoms. With just one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms, methane (CH4) is the simplest hydrocarbon. Some other hydrocarbons are: propane (C3H8), ethane (C2H6) and butane (C4H10). Benefits of Natural Gas Natural gas is increasingly the fuel of choice in today's homes. Below are the top reasons to choose natural gas for your home. 1 | Affordability Natural gas costs less to use in your home than electricity, heating oil, propane or kerosene. On average, electricity costs almost four times more than natural gas. 2 | Convenience and reliability Natural gas is piped directly into your home. It's always there when you need it, and you never have to worry about running out of fuel or arranging for deliveries. 3 | Comfort Natural gas heat feels warmer than heat produced by an electric heat pump. 4 | Domestic supply Nearly 100% of the natural gas consumed in the U.S. is produced in North America with 90% coming directly from the U.S. 5 | Environmental impact Simply put - natural gas is the cleanest-burning energy source for your home. The combustion of natural gas emits 45% less carbon dioxide than coal. 6 | Energy efficiency Natural gas is highly efficient. About 90% of the natural gas produced is delivered to customers as useful energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Corporation Annual Information Form
    TRANSCANADA CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM February 23, 2009 TRANSCANADA CORPORATION i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................................i PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................ii FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION.............................................................................................................................ii TRANSCANADA CORPORATION .......................................................................................................................................1 Corporate Structure .............................................................................................................................................................1 Intercorporate Relationships ...............................................................................................................................................1 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS .............................................................................................................2 Developments in the Pipelines Business.............................................................................................................................2 Developments in the Energy Business ................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Pre-Filed Revised Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit
    The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal Update of Synapse Analysis Prepared by: Ezra Hausman and Kenji Takahashi, Synapse Energy Economics 22 Pearl Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 www.synapse-energy.com 617-661-3248 January 19, 2007 OAGI0000225_ 1 Background In March, 2006, Synapse Energy Economics ("Synapse") released a report entitled "The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal: An Analysis and Assessment of Alternatives"! ("Synapse Report"). The purpose of the Synapse Report, prepared at the request of Save the Sound,2 was to identify and evaluate potential alternatives to the proposed Broadwater Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) import terminal in Long Island Sound to meet the long-term energy needs of the New York and Connecticut markets. In brief, the Synapse Report concluded that: • There is no evidence that the regional market requires a base load gas supply facility capable of providing an additional one billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of natural gas to meet its immediate or long-term needs. More pressing may be an infrastructure or other investment to address potential supply deficiencies during peak winter heating periods. However, the studies prepared by Broadwater Energy do not substantiate even this requirement for the region; • Other, environmentally preferable approaches to resolving any anticipated peak load supply shortfall would provide economically and socially preferable alternatives to any perceived supply deficiency. Such approaches include increased development and use oflocal storage facilities; investments in natural gas and electric energy efficiency and renewable energy resources; expanded use of combined heat and power technology; and repowering of existing gas-fired power plants to increase fuel efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Corporation Annual Information Form
    TRANSCANADA CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM February 22, 2010 TRANSCANADA CORPORATION i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................................i PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................ii FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION.............................................................................................................................ii TRANSCANADA CORPORATION .......................................................................................................................................1 Corporate Structure .............................................................................................................................................................1 Intercorporate Relationships ...............................................................................................................................................1 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS .............................................................................................................2 Developments in the Pipelines Business.............................................................................................................................2 Developments in the Energy Business ................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • January - December, 2005
    Norwalk Hour Index - January - December, 2005 A Students demand dignity: 'Girl’- ACCIDENTS AARP-NORWALK cott calls for end to T-shirt Lawsuit calls park negligent in Graffiti to gangs [photo]. sales [photo]. 11/10/05 pA1+ boy's death. 9/13/05 pA1+ 5/18/05 pA1+ Students right to stage ‘girlcott’ Local boy who died at Playland AARP-WESTPORT/WESTON against T-shirts [letter]. ID’d [photo]. 8/5/05 pA1+ Freitag named chairman of 11/16/05 pA12 Mother to file lawsuit over girl's AARP senior health [photo]. ABONYI, CLEMENT partially severed foot. 2/23/05 2/24/05 pC4 Titans, Packers advance pA3+ Officers inducted by AARP [photo]. 10/31/05 pA13+ Norwalk boy, 7, found dead in chapter [photo]. 7/21/05 pC3+ ABORTION-LAW AND water at Playland ride. 8/4/05 AAUW- LEGISLATION pA15 NORWALK/WESTPORT Activists fear Roe v. Wade ACCIDENTS-NORWALK Booked for the weekend [photo reversal. 7/11/05 pA1+ 2 men hit by car on way to train with caption]. 3/21/05 pA4 ‘Griswold’ case still colors station. 10/8/05 pA3+ Shays says terror fight must privacy debate. 9/26/05 pA1+ Accident victim identified as rely on detection and ABORTION-MORAL AND Stamford resident, 28. 4/9/05 prevention. 3/30/05 pA3+ ETHICAL ASPECTS pA1 ABANDONMENT OF 'Abortion' is another kind of Landscape worker dies in fall HOUSING-CONNECTICUT execution [letter]. 1/1/05 pA10 from tree [photo]. 4/8/05 pA1+ Fight over abandonment of Abortion limits future work force Man killed in S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal Update of Synapse Analysis
    United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. In the Matter of: NYS000090 (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Corrected: August 15, 2012 Docket #: 05000247 | 05000286 NYS000090-00-BD01 10/15/2012 ----NYS000045 Exhibit #: Identified: Admitted: 10/15/2012 Withdrawn: Submitted: December 14, 2011 Rejected: Stricken: Other: EXCERPT • The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal Update of Synapse Analysis January 19,2007 OAGI0000225_ 1 Background In March, 2006, Synapse Energy Economics ("Synapse") released a report entitled "The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal: An Analysis and Assessment of Alternatives"! ("Synapse Report"). The purpose of the Synapse Report, prepared at the request of Save the Sound,2 was to identify and evaluate potential alternatives to the proposed Broadwater Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) import terminal in Long Island Sound to meet the long-term energy needs of the New York and Connecticut markets. In brief, the Synapse Report concluded that: • There is no evidence that the regional market requires a base load gas supply facility capable of providing an additional one billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of natural gas to meet its immediate or long-term needs. More pressing may be an infrastructure or other investment to address potential supply deficiencies during peak winter heating periods. However, the studies prepared by Broadwater Energy do not substantiate even this requirement for the region; • Other, environmentally preferable approaches to resolving any anticipated peak load supply shortfall would provide economically and socially preferable alternatives to any perceived supply deficiency. Such approaches include increased development and use oflocal storage facilities; investments in natural gas and electric energy efficiency and renewable energy resources; expanded use of combined heat and power technology; and repowering of existing gas-fired power plants to increase fuel efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
    Case Study: New LNG Supply to New York State Michael J. Scott Deputy Director, Gas Water and Safety Office of Electric, Gas and Water New York State Department of Public June 2-5, 2008 Service Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) • According to the federal Energy Information Administration (EIA), US natural gas consumption is projected to increase from 22.5 TCF in 2002 to 26.2 Tcf in 2010 and 31.4 Tcf by 2025 – A large contributor to increased natural gas consumption is the electric power sector • Domestic gas production is expected to increase more slowly than consumption over the forecast period, with production in 2025 expected to be 24.0 Tcf • The difference will be made up by imports • Nearly all the increase in US natural gas imports is expected to come from LNG Case Study - LNG 2 LNG (cont.) • Numerous LNG import facilities are being proposed for the Northeast • Siting of an LNG facility is very difficult with environmental, safety and security issues being raised in the various proceedings • As a result, it is expected that only a few of the proposed and approved Northeast LNG projects will actually be built Case Study - LNG 3 Natural Gas Facility Regulatory Process FERC Pre-Filing Certification Process (Required for LNG Projects) • FERC receives applicants request for Pre-Filing • FERC formally approves process and issues a PF Docket No • Applicant holds public open house to discuss project with FERC’s participation • FERC issues Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS and opens scoping period
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 13/Friday, January 18
    3458 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Notices j. Deadline for filing comments, only those who file a motion to Energy LLC is jointly owned by TCPL motions to intervene, and protest: intervene in accordance with the USA LNG, Inc. (a subsidiary of February 11, 2008. All documents Commission’s Rules may become a TransCanada Corporation) and Shell (original and eight copies) should be party to the proceeding. Any comments, Broadwater Holdings LLC (a subsidiary filed with: Secretary, Federal Energy protests, or motions to intervene must of Shell Oil Company). Broadwater Regulatory Commission, 888 First be received on or before the specified Pipeline LLC is owned by Broadwater Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. comment date for the report. Energy LLC. The Commission’s Rules of Practice o. Any filings must bear in all capital The proposed LNG terminal would be and Procedure require all intervenors letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’, located in New York State waters of filing documents with the Commission ‘‘PROTEST’’, or ‘‘MOTION TO Long Island Sound, approximately 9 to serve a copy of that document on INTERVENE’’, as applicable, and the miles from the nearest shoreline of Long each person whose name appears on the Project Number of the particular Island, and about 10 miles from the official service list for the project. application to which the filing refers. nearest shoreline in Connecticut. The Further, if an intervenor files comments p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, terminal would be a floating storage and or documents with the Commission and local agencies are invited to file regasification unit (FSRU) that would be relating to the merits of an issue that comments on the described report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal an Analysis and Assessment of Alternatives
    The Proposed Broadwater LNG Import Terminal An Analysis and Assessment of Alternatives Prepared by: Ezra Hausman, Kenji Takahashi, David Schlissel and Bruce Biewald Synapse Energy Economics 22 Pearl Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 www.synapse-energy.com 617-661-3248 Final Report March 2, 2006 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Executive Summary .................................................................... 1 II. Broadwater project description............................................................................... 2 III. Broadwater “need” assessment is misleading......................................................... 2 Summary: Is there a natural gas supply shortfall in New York and Connecticut? 5 IV. Managing Growth in Natural Gas Demand ............................................................ 6 Summary: Can natural gas demand growth in New York and Connecticut be met with supply side management? ............................................................................... 8 V. Supply alternatives.................................................................................................. 9 Summary: Is Broadwater the only option for additional natural gas supplies in New York and Connecticut?.................................................................................. 12 VI. Is LNG an abundant and inexpensive source of natural gas? ............................... 12 Summary: Will LNG mean cheaper gas for consumers?...................................... 14 VII. Conclusions..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LNG: an Un-American Energy Source
    LNG: An Un-American Energy Source Liquefied Natural Gas: An Expensive, Dirty, Foreign Fossil Fuel That Threatens Our Natural Gas Energy Independence A Clean Ocean Action Report Prepared by: David Byer, Esq. Heather Saffert, Ph.D. September 2008 LNG: An Un-American Energy Source Liquefied Natural Gas: An Expensive, Dirty, Foreign Fossil Fuel That Threatens Our Natural Gas Energy Independence Prepared by: David Byer, Esq., Water Policy Attorney Heather Saffert, Ph.D., Staff Scientist A Clean Ocean Action Report 18 Hartshorne Drive Suite 2 Highlands, New Jersey 732.872.0111 CleanOceanAction.org September 2008 i David Byer received a Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Vermont Law School (VLS) where he received many academic and leadership awards, and is a member of the New Jersey Bar. He also received a Bachelor of Science (also magna cum laude) from University of South Carolina in Accounting, with a minor in general sciences. Before joining Clean Ocean Action, he was a Judicial Clerk in Kenai, Alaska. He also was a law clerk for Kaplan Kirsch and Rockwell in Colorado and a Research Fellow for the Sustainable Endowments Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Heather Saffert received her Ph.D. in Oceanography from the University of Rhode Island. She received a Bachelor of Arts from Wesleyan University in Biology, with honors for coastal ecology research. She has worked as a marine science consultant and instrument developer. Her Ph.D. centered on coastal water quality problems and developing a new instrument with SubChem Systems in Rhode Island to measure fecal bacteria levels. Heather also took part in a survey of the Hudson River and its plume.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Natural Gas - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Liquefied natural gas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LNG#LNG_safety_and_accidents Liquefied natural gas From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from LNG) Liquefied natural gas or LNG is natural gas that has been converted to liquid form for ease of storage or transport. The liquefaction process involves removal of certain components (such as dust, helium, or impurities that could cause difficulty downstream, e.g. water, and heavy hydrocarbons) and then condensed into a liquid at close to atmospheric pressure (Maximum Transport Pressure set around 25 kPa (3.6psi)) by cooling it to approximately -163 degrees Celsius. LNG is transported in specially designed cryogenic sea vessels or cryogenic road tankers; and stored in specially designed tanks. LNG is about 1/614th the volume of natural gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP), making it much more cost-efficient to transport over long distances where pipelines do not exist. Where moving natural gas by pipelines is not possible or economical, it can be transported by LNG vessels. The most common tank types are membrane (TGZ Mark III and GT96) and Moss Rosenberg (spheres) or Self-Supporting Prismatic Type. Contents 1 Basic facts on LNG 1.1 Trade in LNG 2 LNG environmental concerns 3 LNG safety and accidents 4 LNG storage 5 LNG Transportation 6 LNG refrigeration 7 LNG, LPG, and CNG 7.1 Liquefied natural gas (LNG) 7.2 Compressed natural gas (CNG) 7.3 Liquid petroleum gas (LPG) 8 References 9 See also 10 External links Basic facts on LNG LNG offers an energy density comparable to petrol and diesel fuels and produces less pollution, but its relatively high cost of production and the need to store it in expensive cryogenic tanks have prevented its widespread use in commercial applications.
    [Show full text]