DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Friday, April 5, 2002 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Determinations of Prudency and Proposed Designations of Critical Habitat for Plant Species From the Island of Molokai, Hawaii; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<13>2002 12:44 Apr 04, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\05APP2.SGM pfrm03 PsN: 05APP2 16492 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2002 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the threats from vandalism or collection materials concerning this proposal by of this species on Molokai. any one of several methods: Fish and Wildlife Service We propose critical habitat You may submit written comments designations for 46 species within 10 and information to the Field Supervisor, 50 CFR Part 17 critical habitat units totaling U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific RIN 1018–AH08 approximately 17,614 hectares (ha) Islands Office, 300 Ala Moana Blvd., (43,532 acres (ac)) on the island of Room 3–122, P.O. Box 50088, Honolulu, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Molokai. HI 96850–0001. and Plants; Revised Determinations of If this proposal is made final, section Prudency and Proposed Designations 7 of the Act requires Federal agencies to You may hand-deliver written of Critical Habitat for Plant Species ensure that actions they carry out, fund, comments to our Pacific Islands Office From the Island of Molokai, Hawaii or authorize do not destroy or adversely at the address given above. modify critical habitat to the extent that You may view comments and AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, the action appreciably diminishes the materials received, as well as supporting Interior. value of the critical habitat for the documentation used in the preparation ACTION: Revised proposed rule and survival and recovery of the species. of this proposed rule, by appointment, notice of determinations of whether Section 4 of the Act requires us to during normal business hours at the designation of critical habitat is consider economic and other relevant above address. prudent. impacts of specifying any particular area FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and as critical habitat. We solicit data and comments from Henson, Field Supervisor, Pacific Wildlife Service (Service), propose Islands Office (see ADDRESSES section) critical habitat for 46 of the 51 listed the public on all aspects of this proposal, including data on the (telephone 808/541–3441; facsimile plant species known historically from 808/541–3470). the island of Molokai that are listed economic and other impacts of the under the Endangered Species Act of designations. We may revise or further SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: refine this rule, including critical 1973, as amended. Critical habitat is not Background proposed for 4 species as they no longer habitat boundaries, prior to final occur on the island of Molokai, and we designation based on habitat and plant In the Lists of Endangered and are unable to identify any habitat surveys, public comment on the revised Threatened Plants (50 CFR 17.12), there essential to their conservation on the proposed critical habitat rule, and new are 51 plant species that, at the time of island of Molokai. Critical habitat is not scientific and commercial information. listing, were reported from the island of proposed for one species of loulu palm, DATES: We will accept comments until Molokai (Table 1). Sixteen of these Pritchardia munroi, for which we June 4, 2002. Public hearing requests species are endemic to the island of determined, in a previous proposal, that must be received by May 20, 2002. Molokai, while 35 species are reported critical habitat designation is not ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, from one or more other islands, as well prudent because it would likely increase you may submit your comments and as Molokai. TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF ISLAND DISTRIBUTION OF 51 SPECIES FROM MOLOKAI Island Distribution Species (Common Name) N.W. Isles, Kauai Oahu Molokai Lanai Maui Hawaii Kahoolawe Niihau Adenophorus periens (pendant kihi fern) CHCRRC Alectryon macrococcus (mahoe) ............. C C C C Bidens wiebkei (ko oko olau) ................... C Bonamia menziesii (No common name) CCHCCC Brighamia rockii (pua ala) ........................ C H H Canavalia molokaiensis (awikiwiki) .......... C Centaurium sebaeoides (awiwi) ............... CCCCC Clermontia oblongifolia ssp. brevipes (oha wai) ............................................... C Ctenitis squamigera (pauoa) .................... HCCCCH Cyanea dunbarii (haha) ........................... C Cyanea grimesiana ssp. grimesiana (haha) ................................................... CCCC Cyanea mannii (haha) ............................. C Cyanea procera (haha) ............................ C Cyperus trachysanthos (pu uka a) .......... CCHH Ni (C) Diellia erecta (Asplenium-leaved Diellia) CCCHCC Diplazium molokaiense (No common name) ................................................... HHHHC Eugenia koolauensis (nioi) ....................... C H Flueggea neowawraea (mehamehame) .. C C H C C Hedyotis mannii (pilo) .............................. C C C Hesperomannia arborescens (No com- mon name) ........................................... CCHC Hibiscus arnottianus ssp. immaculatus (kokio ke okeo) ..................................... C Hibiscus brackenridgei (mao hau hele) ... HCHCCCKa (R) VerDate 11<MAY>2000 16:20 Apr 04, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05APP2.SGM pfrm01 PsN: 05APP2 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2002 / Proposed Rules 16493 TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF ISLAND DISTRIBUTION OF 51 SPECIES FROM MOLOKAI—Continued Island Distribution Species (Common Name) N.W. Isles, Kauai Oahu Molokai Lanai Maui Hawaii Kahoolawe Niihau Ischaemum byrone (Hilo ischaemum) ..... R C C C Isodendrion pyrifolium (wahine noho kula) ...................................................... HHHHHCNi (H) Labordia triflora (kamakahala) ................. C Lysimachia maxima (No common name) C Mariscus fauriei (No common name) ...... C H C Marsilea villosa (ihi ihi) ............................ C C Ni (H) Melicope mucronulata (alani) ................... C C Melicope munroi (alani) ........................... H C Melicope reflexa (alani) ............................ C Neraudia sericea (No common name) .... C H C Ka (H) Peucedanum sandwicense (makou) ........ C C C C Phyllostegia mannii (No common name) C H Phyllostegia mollis (No common name) .. C H C Plantago princeps (laukahi kuahiwi) ........ C C C C H Platanthera holochila (No common name) ................................................... C H C C Pritchardia munroi (loulu) ......................... C Pteris lidgatei (No common name) .......... C H C Schiedea lydgatei (No common name) ... C Schiedea nuttallii (No common name) .... C C C R Schiedea sarmentosa (No common name) ................................................... C Sesbania tomentosa (ohai) ...................... CCCHCCNi (H), Ka (C), NW Isles (C) Silene alexandri (No common name) ...... H Silene lanceolata (No common name) .... HCCH C Solanum incompletum (popolo ku mai) ... H HHHC Spermolepis hawaiiensis (No common name) ................................................... CCCCCC Stenogyne bifida (No common name) ..... C Tetramolopium rockii (No common name) ................................................... C Vigna o-wahuensis (No common name) HCCCCNi (H), Ka (C) Zanthoxylum hawaiiense (a e) ................. C CHCC Key: C (Current)—population last observed within the past 30 years. H (Historical)—population not seen for more than 30 years. R (Reported)—reported from undocumented observations. In previously published proposals we Schiedea lydgatei, Schiedea nuttallii, Pritchardia munroi because it would determined that critical habitat was Schiedea sarmentosa, Sesbania likely increase the threats from prudent for 47 (Adenophorus periens, tomentosa, Silene alexandri, Silene vandalism or collection of this species Alectryon macrococcus, Bidens wiebkei, lanceolata, Spermolepis hawaiiensis, on Molokai, and we did not propose Brighamia rockii, Canavalia Stenogyne bifida, Tetramolopium rockii, critical habitat for this species. No molokaiensis, Centaurium sebaeoides, Vigna o-wahuensis, and Zanthoxylum change is made to that determination Clermontia oblongifolia ssp. brevipes, hawaiiense) of the 51 species reported here. Ctenitis squamigera, Cyanea dunbarii, from Molokai. No change is made to the In this proposal, we determine that Cyanea grimesiana ssp. grimesiana, 47 prudency determinations in this designation of critical habitat is prudent Cyanea mannii, Cyanea procera, Diellia revised proposal and they are hereby for Eugenia koolauensis, a species for erecta, Diplazium molokaiense, incorporated into this proposal (or which a prudency determination has Flueggea neowawraea, Hedyotis mannii, reproposal) (65 FR 66808, 65 FR 79192, not been made previously. Hesperomannia arborescens, Hibiscus 65 FR 82086, 65 FR 83158, 67 FR 3940, In the December 29, 2000, proposal arnottianus ssp. immaculatus, Hibiscus 67 FR 9806). In addition, at the time we we proposed designation of critical brackenridgei, Ischaemum byrone, listed Labordia triflora and Melicope habitat for 32 (Adenophorus periens, Labordia triflora, Lysimachia maxima, munroi we determined that the Alectryon macrococcus, Bidens wiebkei, Mariscus fauriei, Marsilea villosa, designation of critical habitat was Brighamia rockii, Canavalia Melicope
Recommended publications
  • Proposed Endangered Status for 23 Plants From

    Proposed Endangered Status for 23 Plants From

    55862 Federal Register I Vol. 56. No. 210 I Wednesday, October 30, 1991 / Proposed Rules rhylidosperma (no common name (NCN)), Die//ia laciniata (NCN), - Exocarpos luteolus (heau),~Hedyotis cookiana (‘awiwi), Hibiscus clay-i (Clay’s hibiscus), Lipochaeta fauriei (nehe), Lipochaeta rnicrantha (nehe), Lipochaeta wairneaensis (nehe), Lysimachia filifolla (NCN), Melicope haupuensis (alani), Melicope knudsenii (alani), Melicope pal/ida (alani), Melicope quadrangularis (alani) Munroidendron racemosum (NCN). Nothocestrum peltatum (‘aiea), Peucedanurn sandwicense (makou). Phyllostegia wairneae (NCN), Pteraiyxia kauaiensis (kaulu), Schiedea spergulina (NCN), and Solanurn sandwicense (popolo’aiakeakua). All but seven of the species are or were endemic to the island of Kauai, Hawaiian Islands; the exceptions are or were found on the islands of Niihau, Oahu, Molokai, Maui, and/or Hawaii as well as Kauai. The 23 plant species and their habitats have been variously affected or are currently threatened by 1 or more of the following: Habitat degradation by wild, feral, or domestic animals (goats, pigs, mule deer, cattle, and red jungle fowl); competition for space, light, water, and nutrients by naturalized, introduced vegetation; erosion of substrate produced by weathering or human- or animal-caused disturbance; recreational and agricultural activities; habitat loss from fires; and predation by animals (goats and rats). Due to the small number of existing individuals and their very narrow distributions, these species and most of their populations are subject to an increased likelihood of extinction and/or reduced reproductive vigor from stochastic events. This proposal. if made final, would implement the Federal protection and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR recovery provisions provided by the Fish and Wildlife Service Act.

  • Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit Department of Botany University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 948-8218

    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA HONOLULU, HAWAII 96822 (808) 948-8218 PROCEEDINGS FIRST CONFERENCE IN NATURAL SCIENCES HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONTRACT #CX8000 6 0031 Clifford W. Smith, Unit Director The National Park Service and the University of Hawaii signed the memorandum of agreement establishing this Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit on March 16, 1973. The Unit provides a multidisciplinary approach to studies on the biological resources in the National Parks in Hawaii, that is, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Haleakala National Park, City of Refuge National Historical Park, and Puukohola Heiau National Historic Site. Through the Unit Director, projects are undertaken in areas identified by park management. These studies provide information of resource management programs. The involvement of University faculty and students in the resource management of the National Parks in Hawaii lends to a greater awareness of the problems and needs of the Service. At the same time research not directly or immediately applicable to management is also encouraged through the Unit. PROCEEDINGS of the FIRST CONFERENCE IN NATURAL SCIENCES in Hawaii held at Hawaii Field Research Center Hawaii Volcanoes National Park on August 19 - 20, 1976 edited by C. W. Smith, Director, CPSUJUH Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 CONTENTS PREFACE DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY OF A NORTH KONA BURIAL CAVE, ISLAND OF HAWAII by M.S. Allen and T.L. Hunt KOA AND LEHUA TIMBER HARVESTING AND PRODUCT UTILIZATION: RELIGIO-ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN HAWAII, A.D. 1778 by R.A.
  • Handbook Publication.Pub

    Handbook Publication.Pub

    Table of Contents Maui County’s Landscape and Gardening Handbook Xeriscaping in Maui County ................................................................. 1 Planning and Design................................................................................................................. 1 Hydro-zones.............................................................................................................................. 1 Plant Selection and the Maui jkCounty Planting Zones............................................................ 2 Soil Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 4 Mulching.................................................................................................................................... 5 Irrigation .................................................................................................................................... 5 Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 7 Other Interesting Techniques for the Ambitious ..................................... 8 Xeriscape Ponds....................................................................................................................... 8 Aquaponics in the Backyard ..................................................................................................... 9 Water Polymer Crystals ...........................................................................................................
  • 'Ala'alahua, Mahoe

    'Ala'alahua, Mahoe

    Plants ʹAlaʹalahua, mahoe Alectryon macrococcus var. auwahiensis SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species IUCN Red List Ranking ‐ CR B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1T1) Endemism ‐ Maui Kim and Forest Starr, USGS Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: Alectryon macrococcus of the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) is a tree up to 36 ft (11 m) tall with reddish brown branches. The leaves are usually 8 to 22 in (20 to 55 cm) long, typically with two to five pairs of egg‐shaped, slightly asymmetrical leaflets. Glossy and smooth above, the leaves have a conspicuous netted pattern of veins. A dense covering of rust‐colored hairs persists on the lower surfaces of mature leaves of A. macrococcus var. auwahiensis, whereas the mature leaves of A. macrococcus var. macrococcus lack hairs or are only slightly hairy. In both varieties, the flowers, which may be either bisexual or male, are borne in branched clusters up to l2 in (30 cm) long and lack petals. The fruit of this tree provided food for the early Hawaiians, as both the seed and the scarlet‐colored, fleshy aril around it have mild but slightly sweet flavors. The two varieties recognized for this species are Federally Listed as Endangered. The first, variety macrococcus, is found on four Hawaiian islands. The second, discussed here, is variety auwahiensis, found only on the island of Maui, and is much rarer. DISTRIBUTION: A. macrococcus var. auwahiensis is found only on the island of Maui, on the south slope of the volcano Haleakalā, at elevations of 1,017 and 3,562 m (1,168 and 3,337 ft).
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Angiospermic Flora of Rajkandi Reserve Forest of Moulvibazar, Bangladesh

    An Annotated Checklist of the Angiospermic Flora of Rajkandi Reserve Forest of Moulvibazar, Bangladesh

    Bangladesh J. Plant Taxon. 25(2): 187-207, 2018 (December) © 2018 Bangladesh Association of Plant Taxonomists AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE ANGIOSPERMIC FLORA OF RAJKANDI RESERVE FOREST OF MOULVIBAZAR, BANGLADESH 1 2 A.K.M. KAMRUL HAQUE , SALEH AHAMMAD KHAN, SARDER NASIR UDDIN AND SHAYLA SHARMIN SHETU Department of Botany, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh Keywords: Checklist; Angiosperms; Rajkandi Reserve Forest; Moulvibazar. Abstract This study was carried out to provide the baseline data on the composition and distribution of the angiosperms and to assess their current status in Rajkandi Reserve Forest of Moulvibazar, Bangladesh. The study reports a total of 549 angiosperm species belonging to 123 families, 98 (79.67%) of which consisting of 418 species under 316 genera belong to Magnoliopsida (dicotyledons), and the remaining 25 (20.33%) comprising 132 species of 96 genera to Liliopsida (monocotyledons). Rubiaceae with 30 species is recognized as the largest family in Magnoliopsida followed by Euphorbiaceae with 24 and Fabaceae with 22 species; whereas, in Lilliopsida Poaceae with 32 species is found to be the largest family followed by Cyperaceae and Araceae with 17 and 15 species, respectively. Ficus is found to be the largest genus with 12 species followed by Ipomoea, Cyperus and Dioscorea with five species each. Rajkandi Reserve Forest is dominated by the herbs (284 species) followed by trees (130 species), shrubs (125 species), and lianas (10 species). Woodlands are found to be the most common habitat of angiosperms. A total of 387 species growing in this area are found to be economically useful. 25 species listed in Red Data Book of Bangladesh under different threatened categories are found under Lower Risk (LR) category in this study area.
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
  • Urera Kaalae

    Urera Kaalae

    Plants Opuhe Urera kaalae SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species J.K.Obata©Smithsonian Inst., 2005 IUCN Red List Ranking – Critically Endangered (CR D) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1) Endemism – O‘ahu Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: Urera kaalae, a long‐lived perennial member of the nettle family (Urticaceae), is a small tree or shrub 3 to 7 m (10 to 23 ft) tall. This species can be distinguished from the other Hawaiian species of the genus by its heart‐shaped leaves. DISTRIBUTION: Found in the central to southern parts of the Wai‘anae Mountains on O‘ahu. ABUNDANCE: The nine remaining subpopulations comprise approximately 40 plants. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF KEY HABITAT: Urera kaalae typically grows on slopes and in gulches in diverse mesic forest at elevations of 439 to 1,074 m (1,440 to 3,523 ft). The last 12 known occurrences are found on both state and privately owned land. Associated native species include Alyxia oliviformis, Antidesma platyphyllum, Asplenium kaulfusii, Athyrium sp., Canavalia sp., Charpentiera sp., Chamaesyce sp., Claoxylon sandwicense, Diospyros hillebrandii, Doryopteris sp., Freycinetia arborea, Hedyotis acuminata, Hibiscus sp., Nestegis sandwicensis, Pipturus albidus, Pleomele sp., Pouteria sandwicensis, Psychotria sp., Senna gaudichaudii (kolomona), Streblus pendulinus, Urera glabra, and Xylosma hawaiiense. THREATS: Habitat degradation by feral pigs; Competition from alien plant species; Stochastic extinction; Reduced reproductive vigor due to the small number of remaining individuals. CONSERVATION ACTIONS: The goals of conservation actions are not only to protect current populations, but also to establish new populations to reduce the risk of extinction.
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

    Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

    Thursday, February 27, 2003 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Designation or Nondesignation of Critical Habitat for 95 Plant Species From the Islands of Kauai and Niihau, HI; Final Rule VerDate Jan<31>2003 13:12 Feb 26, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM 27FER2 9116 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2003 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR units designated for the 83 species. This FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul critical habitat designation requires the Henson, Field Supervisor, Pacific Fish and Wildlife Service Service to consult under section 7 of the Islands Office at the above address Act with regard to actions carried out, (telephone 808/541–3441; facsimile 50 CFR Part 17 funded, or authorized by a Federal 808/541–3470). agency. Section 4 of the Act requires us SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RIN 1018–AG71 to consider economic and other relevant impacts when specifying any particular Background Endangered and Threatened Wildlife area as critical habitat. This rule also and Plants; Final Designation or In the Lists of Endangered and determines that designating critical Nondesignation of Critical Habitat for Threatened Plants (50 CFR 17.12), there habitat would not be prudent for seven 95 Plant Species From the Islands of are 95 plant species that, at the time of species. We solicited data and Kauai and Niihau, HI listing, were reported from the islands comments from the public on all aspects of Kauai and/or Niihau (Table 1).
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
  • Vegetation Succession Along New Roads at Soqotra Island (Yemen): Effects of Invasive Plant Species and Utilization of Selected N

    Vegetation Succession Along New Roads at Soqotra Island (Yemen): Effects of Invasive Plant Species and Utilization of Selected N

    10.2478/jlecol-2014-0003 Journal of Landscape Ecology (2013), Vol: 6 / No. 3. VEGETATION SUCCESSION ALONG NEW ROADS AT SOQOTRA ISLAND (YEMEN): EFFECTS OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES AND UTILIZATION OF SELECTED NATIVE PLANT RESISTENCE AGAINST DISTURBANCE PETR MADĚRA1, PAVEL KOVÁŘ2, JAROSLAV VOJTA2, DANIEL VOLAŘÍK1, LUBOŠ ÚRADNÍČEK1, ALENA SALAŠOVÁ3, JAROSLAV KOBLÍŽEK1 & PETR JELÍNEK1 1Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of the Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Zemědělská 1/1665, 613 00 Brno 2Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 3Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Horticulture, Department of Landscape Planning, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice Received: 13th November 2013, Accepted: 17th December 2013 ABSTRACT The paved (tarmac) roads had been constructed on Soqotra island over the last 15 years. The vegetation along the roads was disturbed and the erosion started immediately after the disturbance caused by the road construction. Our assumption is that biotechnical measurements should prevent the problems caused by erosion and improve stabilization of road edges. The knowledge of plant species which are able to grow in unfavourable conditions along the roads is important for correct selection of plants used for outplanting. The vegetation succession was observed using phytosociological relevés as a tool of recording and mapping assambblages of plants species along the roads as new linear structures in the landscape. Data from phytosociological relevés were analysed and the succession was characterised in different altitudes. The results can help us to select group of plants (especially shrubs and trees), which are suitable to be used as stabilizing green mantle in various site conditions and for different purposes (anti-erosional, ornamental, protection against noise or dust, etc.).
  • Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants of Namal Valley, Salt Range, Pakistan - 4725

    Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants of Namal Valley, Salt Range, Pakistan - 4725

    Shah et al.: Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants of Namal Valley, Salt Range, Pakistan - 4725 - ETHNOBOTANICAL STUDY OF MEDICINAL PLANTS OF NAMAL VALLEY, SALT RANGE, PAKISTAN SHAH, A.1* – POUDEL, R. C.2 – ISHTIAQ, M.3 – SARVAT, R.1 – SHAHZAD, H.1 – ABBAS, A.1 – SHOAIB, S.1 – NUZHAT, R.1 – NOOR, U. D.1 – MAHMOODA, H.1 – SUMMAYA, A.1 – IFRA, A.1 – IHSAN, U.1 1Department of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha-40100, Pakistan 2Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Pātan-44700, Nepal 3Department of Botany, (Bhimber Campus), Mirpur University of Science & Technology Mirpur-10250 (AJK), Pakistan Corresponding author٭ e-mail: [email protected] ; phone: +92-48-923-0811-15 ext. 609 (Received 5th Jan 2019; accepted 26th Feb 2019) Abstract. This paper presents the first quantitative ethnobotanical knowledge and practices of using native plants for different ailments from Namal Valley of Pakistan. Data was gathered by interviewing 350 informants through semi-structured questionnaires. A total of 217 taxa belonging to 166 genera and 70 families were documented. Fabaceae and Asteraceae families were found to be the most cited families (with 19 and 18 species receptively). Herbs represent the most cited life form (71%) and flower was the most widely used part (34.8%) with decoction as main mode of the utilization (41.5%). On the basis of use values, the most commonly used ethnobotanical taxa in the Valley were reported to be Euphorbia heterophylla (0.7) and Merremia dissecta (0.6). The highest RFC value was noted for Aloe vera (0.14) while highest ICF value was estimated for dental problems category (0.7).
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants

    A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants

    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.