DOCSLIB.ORG

HDC Regional and Land Use Considerations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HDC Regional and Land Use Considerations Regional and Land Use Considerations High Desert Corridor Prepared By TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 5 2. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................. 9 2.1 No Build Alternative ................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Construction of the HDC - Build Alternatives .................................................... 10 2.3 Mitigation Suggestions .......................................................................................... 16 3. ENVIRONMENT, ZONING, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS ................................................. 16 3.1 Description of Area Biomes and Climate .......................................................... 16 3.2 Regional Land Use and Zoning ........................................................................... 17 3.3 Future Zoning and Special District Considerations ........................................... 19 4. RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES, AND LEGISLATION ...................................................... 20 4.1 Federal .................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 California State Legislation .................................................................................. 21 4.3 Los Angeles County .............................................................................................. 22 4.4 San Bernardino County ........................................................................................ 23 4.5 Palmdale ................................................................................................................. 25 4.6 Lancaster ................................................................................................................ 25 4.7 Adelanto ................................................................................................................. 27 4.8 Victorville................................................................................................................. 28 4.9 Apple Valley ........................................................................................................... 29 5. REGIONAL PROFILES AND IMPACTS .......................................................................... 29 5.1 Palmdale ................................................................................................................. 30 5.2 Lancaster ................................................................................................................ 31 5.3 Adelanto ................................................................................................................. 32 5.4 Victorville................................................................................................................. 33 5.5 Apple Valley ........................................................................................................... 34 5.6 Hesperia .................................................................................................................. 35 5.7 Lake Los Angeles ................................................................................................... 36 5.8 Sun Village .............................................................................................................. 37 5.9 Littlerock .................................................................................................................. 38 5.10 Phelan ................................................................................................................... 39 5.11 Helendale ............................................................................................................. 40 5.12 Lucerne Valley ..................................................................................................... 41 5.13 Mountain View Acres .......................................................................................... 42 5.14 Non Census-Designated Places ........................................................................ 43 5.15 Los Angeles County ............................................................................................ 43 5.16 San Bernardino County ...................................................................................... 45 6. GOODS MOVEMENT CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................. 46 6.1 Intermodal Transfer Facilities ................................................................................ 46 6.2 Freight Logistics ...................................................................................................... 51 6.3 Drone (UAV) Technology ..................................................................................... 51 6.4 Autonomous Vehicle (AV) Technology ............................................................. 54 7. COMPONENT OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................... 56 7.1 Pedestrian and Bikeway ....................................................................................... 56 7.2 Roadway ................................................................................................................ 57 7.3 High-Speed Rail ..................................................................................................... 58 7.4 Energy Production ................................................................................................. 59 7.5 Energy Transmission ............................................................................................... 60 7.6 All-Component Approach ................................................................................... 61 8. FINANCING OPTIONS .................................................................................................. 62 8.1 Tax Increment Financing Background ............................................................... 62 8.2 Enhanced Infrastructure Finance District (EIFD) -Policy and Implementation ........................................................................................................................................ 64 8.3 HDC and EIFD ......................................................................................................... 66 8.4 HDC and Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) 72 8.5 HDC and Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) ......... 73 8.6 HDC and Private Activity Bonds (PABs).............................................................. 73 9. REVENUE-GENERATING ASSETS .................................................................................. 75 9.1 Renewable Energy Generation .......................................................................... 75 9.2 Regional Trend toward Distributed Energy Resources..................................... 76 9.3 Off-ramp and Adjacent Development ............................................................. 76 9.4 Usage Fees, Tollway, and High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes ........................ 78 9.5 Public Private Partnership (P3) Considerations ................................................. 79 10. SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITIES ................................................................................. 80 11. NEXT STEPS .................................................................................................................. 82 11.1 Navigating State and Federal Dynamics ........................................................ 83 11.2 Collaboration with Interested Parties ............................................................... 84 11.3 Funding Options .................................................................................................. 86 11.4 Land Use Next Steps for Implementation ........................................................ 88 12. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 89 13. APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 96 Appendix A: List of Acronyms .................................................................................... 96 Appendix B: Glossary of Technical Terms ................................................................ 98 Appendix C: List of Figures ....................................................................................... 102 Appendix D: List of Reports ...................................................................................... 103 This page intentionally left blank. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The High Desert Corridor (HDC) is a proposed 63-mile transitway, green energy corridor, and potential Public Private Partnership (P3) beginning at SR-14 in Los Angeles County, extending across U.S.-395 and I-15, and terminating six miles east of I-15 in San Bernardino County. It is the only urban-adjacent greenfield project of its nature in the country. The route will directly impact the mostly arid cities of Palmdale and Lancaster, in Los Angeles County, and the cities of Adelanto, Victorville, and Apple Valley in San Bernardino County. The HDC presently has eight notable characteristics that relate to land use: 1. Completed California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) filing for a green energy corridor with high-speed rail (HSR), highway/tollway, bike and pedestrian paths. 2. A one of a kind urban-adjacent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • M O J a V E D E S E R T I S S U E S a Secondary
    MOJAVE DESERT ISSUES A Secondary School Curriculum Bruce W. Bridenbecker & Darleen K. Stoner, Ph.D. Research Assistant Gail Uchwat Mojave Desert Issues was funded with a grant from the National Park �� Foundation. Parks as Classrooms is the educational program of the National ����� �� ���������� Park Service in partnership with the National Park Foundation. Design by Amy Yee and Sandra Kaye Published in 1999 and printed on recycled paper ii iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to the following people for their contribution to this work: Elayn Briggs, Bureau of Land Management Caryn Davidson, National Park Service Larry Ellis, Banning High School Lorenza Fong, National Park Service Veronica Fortun, Bureau of Land Management Corky Hays, National Park Service Lorna Lange-Daggs, National Park Service Dave Martell, Pinon Mesa Middle School David Moore, National Park Service Ruby Newton, National Park Service Carol Peterson, National Park Service Pete Ricards, Twentynine Palms Highschool Kay Rohde, National Park Service Dennis Schramm, National Park Service Jo Simpson, Bureau of Land Management Kirsten Talken, National Park Service Cindy Zacks, Yucca Valley Highschool Joe Zarki, National Park Service The following specialists provided information: John Anderson, California Department of Fish & Game Dave Bieri, National Park Service �� John Crossman, California Department of Parks and Recreation ����� �� ���������� Don Fife, American Land Holders Association Dana Harper, National Park Service Judy Hohman, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Becky Miller, California
    [Show full text]
  • Lucerne Valley Community Plan
    Lucerne Valley Community Plan Adopted March 13, 2007 Effective April 12, 2007 Acknowledgments The following members contributed to the preparation of the Lucerne Valley Community Plan Board of Supervisors Brad Mitzelfelt, First District Paul Biane, Second District, Chairman Dennis Hansberger, Third District Gary Ovitt, Fourth District, Vice Chairman Josie Gonzales, Fifth District Planning Commissioners Ken Anderson, First District Michael Cramer, Second District Bill Collazo, Third District Mark Dowling, Vice Chairman, Fourth District Audrey Mathews, Chair, Fifth District General Plan Advisory Committee Mark Bulot, Redlands Ted Dutton, Lake Arrowhead Scott Frier, Helendale Matt Jordan, Redlands Michael Kreeger, Chino Hills Jornal K. Miller, Muscoy Ken Morrison, Yucca Valley Kathy Murphy, Fawnskin Mark Nuaimi, Fontana Marvin Shaw, Lake Arrowhead Doug Shumway, Apple Valley Jean Stanton, Bloomington Eric Swanson, Hesperia Lucerne Valley Community Plan Committee Richard Selby Jean Morgan Bob Delperdang Ernie Gommel Pete Liebrick Jean Magee Bob McDougall Bob Riddle 2 April 12, 2007 County Staff Julie Rynerson Rock, AICP, Director, Land Use Services Department Randy Scott, AICP, Deputy Director, Advance Planning Jim Squire, AICP, Supervising Planner Carrie Hyke, AICP, Supervising Planner Dave Prusch, AICP, Senior Associate Planner Ron Matyas, Senior Associate Planner Matt Slowik, REHS, Senior Associate Planner Consultants to the County URS Corporation Frank Wein, DPDS, FAICP, Project Director Veronica Seyde, Senior Scientist Jeff Rice, AICP, Assistant Project Manager Tom Herzog, Senior Biologist Brian Smith, AICP, Environmental Manager Bryon Bass, Senior Archaeologist Kavita Mehta, Urban and Environmental Planner Paul Nguyen, Senior Air Quality Scientist Cynthia Wilson, Environmental Planner Chris Goetz, Senior Project Geologist Mari Piantka, Senior Environmental Planner Jerry Zimmerle, Principal Engineer Michael Greene, INCE Bd.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Desert Alfalfa Production Region of California Is Located From
    ALFALFA PRODUCTION IN THE HIGH DESERT Steve B. Orloff and Rhonda R. Gildersleeve' ( The high desert alfalfa production region of California is located from the Mojave Desert which includes portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Kern Counties, north to Inyo and Mono Counties. Alfalfa fields in the high desertare clustered in isolated valleys with long stretchesof desert betweenthem. Thesevalleys are so isolated and dispersedthat the climate, growing conditions, soil types, and even the production practices and problems can vary considerably between production areas. The main alfalfa production areas and their characteristics are presentedin table 1. Many people mistakenly believe that "desert" is "desert", and lump the high desert with the low desert. However, those that are familiar with both areas realize there are very distinct differences. The climate in the high desert is unique, but has similarities with both the low desert and the colder northern parts of the state. The high desert climate is characterized by large swings in temperature, both from day to night and from summer to winter. Winter low temperatures between zero to ten degrees(negative 10 to 20 in the northern mountain valleys) have been recorded (particularly this last year), while summer temperatures exceeding 110 degrees commonly occur. A drop in temperature of 40 to 50 degreesbetween day and night is not uncommon. Spring frosts as late as April (and even June in northern high-elevation areas) are routine, and slow alfalfa growth. Winds are a common denominator throughout all of the high-desert valleys. Most areas have a prevailing "breeze" of 10 to 20 miles per hour during the day.
    [Show full text]
  • High Desert Report Is Dedicated to the Memory of Willie Pringle Spring 2015 L Volume 54 The
    The 54th edition of the High Desert Report is dedicated to the memory of Willie Pringle Spring 2015 l Volume 54 The RADCO CompaniesHigh Desert Report An economic overview of the High Desert region affiliated with The Bradco Companies, a commercial real estate group I wish to welcome As a part of our history, in late 1992, cial broker ever inducted, and I am very our current, future, when a friend of mine, Ms. Cele Under- humbled to be a part of this great hon- and long stand- wood, then an Associate with the Keith orary society for the advanced and land ing subscribers and Companies, a company with which we economics. sponsors of the shared office space, suggested that, with We also had a delay in this edition with 54th Edition of the all the development, bus tours and sem- the recent addition of a new member of Bradco High Des- inars in Southern California, we create our family, Mr. Parker Sinibaldi, Ms. ert Report, the first a newsletter. Having no knowledge of Kaitlin Alpert’s son. Parker was born on and only economic how to do a newsletter, I contacted my December 9, 2014, and Ms. Alpert has overview of the long-time friend and mentor, Dr. Alfred just been able to return to work to as- High Desert region, covering the north- Gobar, then Chairman of Alfred Gobar sist us on the Bradco High Desert Re- ern portion of San Bernardino County & Associates (Brea/Anaheim, Califor- port and many of the other endeavors and the Inland Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still
    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still (Photo by Harmon and Nelda King, National Park Service) In the high desert of California, flesh-colored boulders rise up out of the stark landscape and embrace a small valley where Keys Ranch stands. Strangely shaped trees cast long shadows on the sides of the simple wooden ranch structures. Animal tracks in the sand tell of the previous night's adventures when scorpions, kangaroo rats, snakes, and bobcats battled for survival. This seemingly hostile desert environment was settled much later than other more productive areas of the West. Yet it was here, in 1917, that Bill Keys chose to establish a ranch and raise a family. Keys and other 20th-century homesteaders lived much as earlier pioneers in the West had, working hard to make their marginal land holdings successful. Today, Keys Ranch is preserved as part of Joshua Tree National Park. National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Document Contents National Curriculum Standards About This Lesson Getting Started: Inquiry Question Setting the Stage: Historical Context Locating the Site: Map 1. Map 1: Deserts of the Southwest 2. Map 2: Portion of Joshua Tree National Park Determining the Facts: Readings 1. Reading 1: Settling in the California Desert 2. Reading 2: Life on Keys Ranch 3. Reading 3: Excerpts from Emerson’s Essay “Self-Reliance” Visual Evidence: Images 1. Colorado Desert 2. Mojave Desert 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Distribution Trucks: Costs and Benefits 6
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. SWUTC/11/476660-00080-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2011 Hybrid Distribution Trucks: Costs and Benefits 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Garrett Anderson and Rob Harrison Report 476660-00080-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 1616 Guadalupe Street DTRS99-G-0006 Austin, TX 78701 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Southwest Region University Transportation Center September 2010-June 2011 Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 14. Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, Texas 77843-3135 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program. 16. Abstract The respective populations of the United States and Texas are expected to significantly increase over to the next several decades, primarily in urban and metropolitan areas. Economists have also predicted that oil prices will rise in real terms during the same period. Air quality is getting worse in a number of metropolitan areas, triggering non-attainment penalties and spurring an interest in cleaner transportation. Incentives and new policies must be adopted to increase the efficiency of the transportation system and thus move freight with a reduced impact on society and the environment. Hybrids can potentially help solve this issue through their increased fuel economy and reduced emissions. This project evaluated a package delivery truck, beverage delivery truck, and a refuse truck.
    [Show full text]
  • High Desert Resources
    High Desert Resources Family Assistance Program 15075 7th St., VV 92395 / 760-843-0701 Same services as Our House Our House 15075 Seventh St., VV 92395 / 760-843-0701 Youth in crisis 24 hour homeless / runaway emergency shelter (for youth & their families) The Family Spot 15075 7th St., VV 92395 / 760-843-0701 Drop in / Hang Out Safe; all inclusive; LGBT friendly; free after school snacks; free wi-fi Tues thru Sat 2-8pm The Open Door @ Family Assistance Program 813 North D St., San Bernardino 92401 / 909-333-7476 Empowers families, victims & survivors who have been affected by human trafficking and / or sexual exploitation. San Bernardino.gov DBH referrals SBcounty.gov\dbh Consumer access referral – mental health services ADDICTION TREATMENT SERVICES (Alcohol, Drugs, Tobacco) 12 Step Programs • Alcoholics Anonymous – 24 hour hotline / 760-242-9292 • Al-Anon (AA Family Support) / 888-425-2666 • California Smokers Help Line – 800-NO-BUTTS (800-662-8887) • Gamblers Anonymous / 760-261-4267 • Narcotics Anonymous – 24 hour hotline / 888-322-6817 Aegis Medical Systems 11776 Mariposa Road, Hesperia 92345 / 760-956-2462 Alcohol treatment & prevention Out-patient treatment High Desert Child, Adolescent & Family Services Center 16248 Victor St., Victorville 92395 / 760-243-7151 Out-patient substance abuse program for adults Out-patient drug & alcohol treatment for youth 11-18 Drug testing for adults & children (call for appointment) Inland Valley Recovery Services 1260 East Arrow Highway, Upland 91786 / 909-932-1069 In-patient drug & alcohol treatment
    [Show full text]
  • High Desert Report
    Spring 2016 l Volume 55 The RADCO CompaniesHigh Desert Report An economic overview of the High Desert region affiliated with The Bradco Companies, a commercial real estate group We have some very cancer, he was unable to prepare an article Jr.; Mr. Michael Yannone; Mr. Robert R. exciting information for this edition. Considering how long he Gaines, Sr.; Mr. Brad Orchard; Mr. Mark to share in this Edi- has been in this battle, Dr. Gobar is do- Eagleton; Ms. Judith Joan Curren; Mr. tion of the Report. ing quite well. We talk often and he con- Mike Perry & Mr. Tom Perry (the son and But first, I wish to tinues to be one of my personal mentors. husband of our close friend and renowned welcome our cur- When the doctors told him they thought escrow professional Mrs. Debbie Perry); rent, future, and long he would lose a substantial amount of Mr. Stephen J. Flannery; Mr. Bill Nelson; standing subscrib- weight, they forgot that Dr. Gobar is a Ms. Susan Mari So; Ms. Rita Rae Dale; ers and sponsors of unique individual, undoubtedly one of Mr. Chuck Love; Mr. Jack Julian Hall; the 55th Edition of the most unique people anyone will ever Ms. Rita Louise Jaramillo; Mrs. Cherie The Bradco High Desert Report, the first meet. He has actually gained over 16 Vackar; Mr. Lowell Draper; and my wife’s and only economic overview of The High pounds. He looks great and still has the 99-1/5-year old Aunt, Ms. Myrtle Mason- Desert, covering the northern portion of greatest sense of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 High Desert Labor Study
    High Desert High Desert 2016 2016 WORK WORK FORCE FORCE 2016 2016 ADELANTO | APPLE VALLEY | BARSTOW HESPERIA | VICTORVILLE High Desert WORK FORCE 2016 2016 Disclaimer: The information presented is a compilation of data from various sources that are deemed reliable, however; we make no guarantees of its accuracy. The views expressed in the following report are attributable only to the authors and do not represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the data providers. or any of the five communities of study. 2 High Desert 2016 2016 WORK FORCE Data Presented by City of Hesperia Economic Development Department April 4, 2016 Lisa K. LaMere, Management Analyst Special acknowledgement to Joel Martinez, Intern April Antonio, Administrative Aide Mike Borja, Administrative Analyst Juli Rull, Senior Management Analyst Jennifer Shove, Administrative Analyst Rod Yahnke, Interim Economic Development Director 3 High Desert WORK TABLE OF CONTENTS FORCE 2016 2016 Page Contents 4-5 List of Figures 5-6 List of Tables 7 Introduction 8-9 Background 10-11 High Desert Overview 12-13 Economic and Workforce Trends 14-15 Jobs/Housing Balance 16-17 Within Region Commuting Workforce 18-19 Major Employers: Adelanto, Apple Valley, Barstow 20 Major Employers: Hesperia, Victorville, San Bernardino County 21 Active Workforce 22-23 City of Adelanto Workforce Profile 24-25 Town of Apple Valley Workforce Profile 26-27 City of Barstow Workforce Profile 28-29 City of Hesperia Workforce Profile 30-31 City of Victorville Workforce Profile 32-33
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Directory
    Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino RESOURCE DIRECTORY Directory includes services for: Anger Management Co-Parenting Domestic Violence Shelters Domestic Violence/Emergency Numbers Emergency Services Children & Family Services Victim/Witness Services Individual, Couple, Family & Child Counselors Parenting Classes Substance Abuse Treatment/Services 730 Child Custody Evaluations DISCLAIMER: The programs listed have identified themselves to the San Bernardino County Superior Court as providers in the County of San Bernardino. These programs are not affiliated with the court, and each program is independently responsible for compliance with any and all applicable legal requirements. The court does not endorse, evaluate, supervise, or monitor these programs. ADVERTENCIA: Los programas mencionados han indicado al Tribunal Superior de San Bernardino que son proveedores en esta area. Estos programas no están afiliados al Tribunal y cada programa es independientemente responsable por el cumplimiento de todos los requisites legales. El Tribunal no promociona, ni evalúa, ni supervisa, ni monitorea estos programas. Revi sed 1-31-19 1 Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino FAMILY COURT SERVICES DIVISION RESOURCE DIRECTORY - TABLE OF CONTENTS Anger Management 3-7 Co-Parenting Classes 8-11 Domestic Violence Shelters 12-13 Domestic Violence / Emergency Phone Numbers 14 Emergency Services 15-17 Children & Family Services 18 Victim / Witness Services 19 Individual, Couple, Family & Child Counselors 20-25 Parenting Classes 26-32 Substance Abuse Treatment / Services 33-41 730 Child Custody Evaluations 42-43 2 Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino Anger Management DISCLAIMER: The programs listed have identified themselves to the San Bernardino County Superior Court as providers in the Co u n t y of San Bernardino.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis & Developer Outreach Strategy
    Market Analysis & Developer Outreach Strategy February 2019 Prepared By: Kosmont Companies Kosmont Retail NOW!TM Project Background & Status • Kosmont was retained by the Town of Yucca Valley to provide a market analysis and assessment of supportable land uses on 15 former Successor Agency properties/parcels (Town has identified 2 priority opportunity parcels, with an additional 13 to be evaluated following the priorities) • Once the priority properties have been evaluated, the Town has requested Consultant to conduct developer outreach to survey supportable developments • An overview of the evaluation is presented herein • Next steps include formulation of a targeted list of developers, businesses, and brokers and construction of collateral marketing materials (digital and physical) for initial outreach implementation and marketing/business attraction efforts based on market analysis TM Kosmont Retail NOW! 2 Kosmont Companies Overview Kosmont Companies is a nationally-recognized real estate & economics advisory firm specializing in public-private transactions for 32+ years. • Offers a full range of economics & real estate advisory services including: – Market and Feasibility Analyses – Economic Development Strategies & Implementation – Identification of Funding Sources & Financing Strategies – Fiscal Impact & Economic Benefit Studies – Retailer/Developer & Business Recruitment – Public-Private Transaction Structuring & Negotiation • Winning track record of initiating and implementing projects for municipalities – In-house team includes
    [Show full text]