DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Resources on the Care and Welfare of Horses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Resources on the Care and Welfare of Horses NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY ARCHIVED FILE Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. This file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Content may not appear in full or in its original format. All links external to the document have been deactivated. For additional information, see http://pubs.nal.usda.gov. United States Information Resources on the Care and Department of Agriculture Welfare of Horses AWIC Resource Series No. 36 Agricultural Research November 2006 Service Updates Housing, Husbandry, and Welfare of Horses, 1994 National Agricultural Library Animal Welfare Information Center Compiled and edited by: Cristin Swords Animal Welfare Information Center National Agricultural Library U.S. Department of Agriculture Published by: U. S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service National Agricultural Library Animal Welfare Information Center Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Web site: http://awic.nal.usda.gov Published in cooperation with the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine Web Policies and Important Links Contents Forward About this Document Request Library Materials Horse Welfare by D. Mills, University of Lincoln Equine Welfare Issues in the United States: An Introduction by C.L. Stull, University of California, Davis Bibliography Anesthesia and Analgesia Behavior Environmental Enrichment Housing Law and Legislation Nutrition and Feeding Feeding Methods Feeding Restrictions Age Specific Nutrition Concentrates Roughages Vitamins and Supplements Pasture PMU Ranching Safety Training Transportation Web Resources Forward This information resource came to fruition through the diligence of a student employee at the Animal Welfare Information Center. The document contains a comprehensive bibliography and extensive selection of web site resources. Two papers introducing horse care and welfare issues are also included. Dr. C. Stull of the University of California at Davis presents an overview of equine issues in the United States and Dr. D. Mills of the University of Lincoln gives an introduction to worldwide equine ethics and concerns. Horse welfare issues are coming increasingly to the forefront of animal issues. An economic impact study conduced by Deloitte Consulting LLP for the American Horse Council Foundation in 2005 indicated that there are over 9.2 million horses in the United States with over 4.6 million people involved as horse owners, service providers, employees and volunteers. Over the past few years, the US Congress ha s discussed bills related to the transportation and slaughter of horses as well as the sale of wild free-roaming horses and burros. Additionally, concerns over the production of pregnant mare's urine for hormone replacement therapy (PMU ranching) led to the establishment of groups who placed animals in new homes after ranches were closed. For an overview of the equine ranching industry, see the article PMU Ranching Demonstrates Benefits of Self-Regulation by Norman Luba in the Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin Vol 10., No. 1-2 (1999). In the United States, the federal Horse Protection Act was first passed in 1972 in order to prohibit painful soring practices and continues to be enforced today. Under the Animal Welfare Act, only horses used in biomedical research, teaching or testing are regulated. The Animal Legal and Historical Center at the Michigan State University College of Law provides a list of federal and state horse related statutes in the United States. Worldwide, many countries perceive horses as pets rather than farm animals. In the United Kingdom (UK), DEFRA provides a gateway to horse issues in government, including links to information on health, breeding, and passports for travel. An overview of international anti-cruelty laws is also provided by the Animal Legal and Historical Center at the Michigan State University College of Law. This document will continue to evolve as new research is conducted and published. It is hoped that this information resource is a starting point for all people who care and work with horses. About this Document This publication updates and expands AWIC's Housing, Husbandry and Welfare of Horses, 1994. The bibliographic chapters are divided into subject areas that cover anesthesia and analgesia, behavior, environmental enrichment, housing, law and legislation, nutrition and feeding, pasture, equine ranching, safety , training and transportation. Citations included in these chapters were published between 1994 and December 2006 and selected from searches conducted using a variety of agricultural, medical and life science databases. In each chapter, the citations are arranged alphabetically according to the last name of the primary author. Web sites specific to each topic area are included at the end of the chapters. Each citation in the bibliographies contains descriptor terms, an abstract when available, and the NAL call number if the particular source is available at the National Agricultural Library (NAL). Visit the NAL web site for information on how to request library materials. Readers are cautioned as to the dynamic nature of the internet and the fact that web addresses and content are subject to change. All sites are current as of April 2008. Return to Contents Return to Top Contact the Animal Welfare Information Center http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/horses/horses.htm April 24, 2008 Animal Welfare Information Center Information Resources on the Care and Welfare of Horses Return to Contents Horse Welfare by Daniel Mills, PhD Department of Biological Sciences University of Lincoln Riseholme Park The scientific assessment of equine welfare has grown markedly over the last decade, but welfare assessment is not an easy task as it is by its very nature multidisciplinary. It is therefore timely for a review of available resources to help all of us interested in improving horse welfare. It is particularly important as there is still no complete consensus on what “welfare” really is, even among welfare scientists. Some will emphasise the importance of health, others, feelings and yet others the ability for an animal to fulfil its natural potential. For some, the feelings of an individual at a given time should be referred to as its well-being, with welfare considering not just the animal’s current feelings but also the threats to its well-being. Thus it might be argued that horses whose work puts them at risk of particular injury, such as limb injury in race horses, have worse welfare than those whose work does not pose such risks. This approach can be useful when considering welfare within the context of populations, but it is important not to forget the individual. Even if the risk is 1 in 10000 for a catastrophic injury, the consequences for that one individual that is injured are disastrous. Some also consider the effort required by an animal to maintain its state of well-being. Thus Broom (1986) defines welfare as the state of an animal with regards to its attempts to cope with its environment. This would imply that a horse kept in an optimal ambient temperature may be thought to have better welfare than one who must devote additional resources to the maintenance of such a temperature. It is therefore important to clarify what an individual means by the term “welfare” especially when one animal’s welfare is said to be better for another. However, a publication like this makes no judgement and allows individuals and groups to access the latest information they need for their purposes. It is sad truth that well-meaning intentions do not always translate into well-being of our charges, and horses are particularly a victim of this. Being kept in quarters that look comfortable to carers may not be most appropriate for horses, who have strong social tendencies and a physiology and psychology adapted to a life feeding on open grasslands. A common criticism of those seeking to assess animal welfare objectively is that we cannot know the mind of another; but this criticism reflects a failure to understand the fundamental principles of the scientific method. Science makes progress through hypotheses which can be tested but which can never be shown to be completely true. In this respect welfare is no different to any other scientific pursuit. All scientific evidence carries with it a degree of uncertainty and we decide what level we are prepared to accept (often a 5% chance level). However these principles are often forgotten by sceptics who, for whatever reason, appear not to want to contemplate what might be happening in the minds of other animals. There is a need for those interested in animal welfare to make clear and defend the scientific basis of their work in order to propose what is possible, realistic and reasonably justifiable. There are many reasons to be interested in horse welfare. From an ethical perspective it might be argued that we have a responsibility to minimise the suffering we cause to other animals with whom we interact either directly or indirectly. From a practical point of view, animals with good welfare might be expected to perform their work more efficiently. From an academic perspective the assessment of animal welfare is also a challenging intellectual task. However, it is not the aim of this publication to argue why we should measure horse welfare or the ethics of what we do to horses, rather it is hoped that to bring together information to help increase awareness of the methods at our disposal for the assessment and management of the welfare of the horse in a broad range of contexts. A practical problem for advances in equine welfare concerns the need for funding in this field. Horses are expensive animals to keep and study; and although they are of enormous economic importance, the industry is fragmented and often poorly represented to governments and other funding bodies as a significant concern, except perhaps for the case of the equine athlete. The welfare research field has largely been driven by concern over whether what we do to animals is acceptable and not purely by the intellectual issues involved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoletil 100 Injectable Anaesthetic/Sedative for Dogs, Cats, Zoo and Wild Animals
    Zoletil 100 Injectable Anaesthetic/Sedative for Dogs, Cats, Zoo and Wild Animals Virbac (Australia) Pty Limited Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 1 Chemwatch: 6978267 Issue Date: 11/01/2019 Version No: 4.1.16.10 Print Date: 08/31/2021 Safety Data Sheet according to WHS Regulations (Hazardous Chemicals) Amendment 2020 and ADG requirements L.GHS.AUS.EN SECTION 1 Identification of the substance / mixture and of the company / undertaking Product Identifier Product name Zoletil 100 Injectable Anaesthetic/Sedative for Dogs, Cats, Zoo and Wild Animals Chemical Name Not Applicable Synonyms APVMA No.: 38837 Chemical formula Not Applicable Other means of identification Not Available Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Relevant identified uses For the anaesthesia and immobilisation of dogs, cats, zoo and wild animals. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name Virbac (Australia) Pty Limited Address 361 Horsley Road Milperra NSW 2214 Australia Telephone 1800 242 100 Fax +61 2 9772 9773 Website au.virbac.com Email [email protected] Emergency telephone number Association / Organisation Poisons Information Centre Emergency telephone 13 11 26 numbers Other emergency telephone Not Available numbers SECTION 2 Hazards identification Classification of the substance or mixture NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL. NON-DANGEROUS GOODS. According to the WHS Regulations and the ADG Code. ChemWatch Hazard Ratings Min Max Flammability 1 Toxicity 1 0 = Minimum Body Contact 1 1 = Low 2 = Moderate Reactivity 1 3 = High Chronic 0 4 = Extreme Poisons Schedule S4 Classification [1] Not Applicable Label elements Hazard pictogram(s) Not Applicable Signal word Not Applicable Hazard statement(s) Not Applicable Precautionary statement(s) Prevention Not Applicable Precautionary statement(s) Response Not Applicable Precautionary statement(s) Storage Page 1 continued..
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Risks & Preparation for a Successful Sedation Or Anesthetic Event
    Patient risks & Sleep preparation for a successful well… sedation or anesthetic event Odette O, DVM, DACVAA ▪ Sedation versus general anesthetic: what are the considerations? ▪ What are the risks (literally) of sedation &/or anesthesia? ▪ Optimize patient preparation prior to sedation/anesthesia whenever possible! ▪ Be prepared: Who? What? Where? When? Why? ▪ Troubleshooting a rough recovery… ▪ ↑ risk of mortality seen with increasing ASA status ▪ Importance of patient evaluation and stabilization PRIOR to commencement of procedure ▪ Identify risk factors and monitor carefully ▪ Largest proportion of deaths in post-procedure period ▪ Continued patient monitoring & support vital • Diagnostic Imaging • Radiographs, CT, U/S • Biopsies • Small wound repair • Bandaging • Convenience • Faster recovery times • Reversible options • ↓ $ • ↑ margin of safety ▪ Reversible unconsciousness ▪ Amnesia ▪ Analgesia ▪ Muscle relaxation ▪ Perform a procedure ▪ w/o suffering ▪ Safety ▪ Patient ▪ Veterinary Care Provider(s) ▪ Multi-modal approach ▪ DO NOT “mask down” (canine/feline) patients! ▪ Patient & occupational safety concerns ▪ MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) = amount of inhalant needed for 50% of patients non- responsive to supramaximal stimulus ▪ Isoflurane: ≈ 1.3% canine, ≈1.6% feline ▪ Sevoflurane: ≈ 2.3% canine, ≈ 3% feline ▪ allows estimate of amount inhalant required ▪ factors: procedure, patient pre-med response, inhalant ▪ Minimal calculations needed ▪ Inhalant effective in every species we encounter ▪ Predictable effects on most patients,
    [Show full text]
  • EQUINE VISION - WHAT DOES YOUR HORSE SEE? by Tammy Miller Michau, Michele Stengard, Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists
    EQUINE VISION - WHAT DOES YOUR HORSE SEE? By Tammy Miller Michau, Michele Stengard, Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists For millennia, the horse has depended on its visual abilities for it’s survival. In the current world, survival has become less of an issue but the visual function of the horse is still critically adapted to a “flight” response from threats or predators. Therefore, understanding horses normal vision is critical to understand normal behavior and the effects of disease on vision. Changes in vision secondary to disease can result in abnormal behavior and poor performance. WHAT DOES THE HORSE “SEE”? The horse’s vision is adapted to function in both bright light and dim light. The act of seeing is a complex process that depends upon: 1) light from the outside world falling onto the eye, 2) the eye transmitting and focusing the images of these objects on the retina where they are detected, 3) the transmission of this information to the brain, and 4) the brain processing this information so as to make it useful. VISUAL PERSPECTIVE AND FIELD OF VIEW Visual perspective varies greatly depending on whether the horse’s head is up or down (i.e. grazing) and how tall it is (i.e. miniature horse or a draft breed). The position of the eyes in the skull of a horse allows for a wide, panoramic view. Their visual field is enormous (up to 350°) and provides nearly a complete sphere of vision with few small “blind spots”. DEPTH PERCEPTION Stereopsis (binocular depth perception) is the fusing of 2 images from slightly different vantage points into one image.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in China
    Country Report for the Preparation of the First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources Report on Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in China June 2003 Beijing CONTENTS Executive Summary Biological diversity is the basis for the existence and development of human society and has aroused the increasing great attention of international society. In June 1992, more than 150 countries including China had jointly signed the "Pact of Biological Diversity". Domestic animal genetic resources are an important component of biological diversity, precious resources formed through long-term evolution, and also the closest and most direct part of relation with human beings. Therefore, in order to realize a sustainable, stable and high-efficient animal production, it is of great significance to meet even higher demand for animal and poultry product varieties and quality by human society, strengthen conservation, and effective, rational and sustainable utilization of animal and poultry genetic resources. The "Report on Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in China" (hereinafter referred to as the "Report") was compiled in accordance with the requirements of the "World Status of Animal Genetic Resource " compiled by the FAO. The Ministry of Agriculture" (MOA) has attached great importance to the compilation of the Report, organized nearly 20 experts from administrative, technical extension, research institutes and universities to participate in the compilation team. In 1999, the first meeting of the compilation staff members had been held in the National Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Service, discussed on the compilation outline and division of labor in the Report compilation, and smoothly fulfilled the tasks to each of the compilers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert (PDF)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION Tiletamine (hydrochloride) Item No. 19794 CAS Registry No.: 14176-50-2 Formal Name: 2-(ethylamino)-2-(2- thienyl)-cyclohexanone, S monohydrochloride Synonyms: CI-634, CL-399, CN 54521-2, HN NSC 167740 O MF: C12H17NOS • HCl FW: 259.8 Purity: ≥98% • HCl UV/Vis.: λmax: 236 nm Supplied as: A crystalline solid Storage: -20°C Stability: As supplied, 2 years from the QC date provided on the Certificate of Analysis, when stored properly Description Tiletamine (hydrochloride) (Item No. 19794) is an analytical reference standard that is structurally classified as an arylcyclohexylamine. It is a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist used in veterinary medicine for its anesthetic and sedative properties, which are comparable to ketamine (Item No. 11630).1,2 Abuse of this compound has been documented.2 It is intended for forensic and research purposes only. References 1. Klockgether, T., Turski, L., Schwarz, M., et al. Paradoxical convulsant action of a novel non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, tiletamine. Brain Res. 461(2), 343-348 (1988). 2. Quail, M. T., Weimersheimer, P., Woolf, A. D., et al. Abuse of telazol: An animal tranquilizer. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 39(4), 399-402 (2001). WARNING CAYMAN CHEMICAL THIS PRODUCT IS FOR RESEARCH ONLY - NOT FOR HUMAN OR VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC USE. 1180 EAST ELLSWORTH RD SAFETY DATA ANN ARBOR, MI 48108 · USA This material should be considered hazardous until further information becomes available. Do not ingest, inhale, get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Wash thoroughly after handling. Before use, the user must review the complete Safety Data Sheet, which has been sent via email to your institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Headshaking Common Problems by Dr John Kohnke Bvsc RDA Fact Sheet 33
    C33 Headshaking Common Problems By Dr John Kohnke BVSc RDA Fact Sheet 33 Headshaking can be a difficult problem to diagnose and manage. around the globe have been able to shed some light on this type of Research has shown that the incidence is increasing in horses headshaking in horses. Researchers in the UK suggested in 2000 between 6 and 12 years of age. that the behaviour is due to increased sensitivity in the trigeminal nerve which provides sensation to the upper face, nose and muzzle Headshaking was first described almost 200 years ago. It is areas. Local anaesthesia of the rear nasal branch (maxillary) of the characterised by an uncontrollable, often repetitive vertical and trigeminal nerve in the studies resulted in an 80-100% reduction horizontal (head nodding) or rotary movement of the head and in clinical signs in most headshakers. The researchers also found neck, often without any obvious external cause or stimuli. Some that fitting a nasal filtering mask to slow the air entering the nostrils horses also rub their face and nostrils, often on the front legs or on and inhalation of particulate matter can reduce the signs of fences. A number of affected horses might also snort regularly and headshaking by 90-100% in most headshakers. However, when the these horses often have mild nasal discharge. Some horses exhibit mask is removed, the symptoms often return. This supports the only mild or intermittent symptoms, others develop a frequent, theory that there is a trigger zone in the rear nasal cavity. violent headshaking habit with the appearance of distress.
    [Show full text]
  • Published in ” Natural Horse 3, 44-47, 2001 Volume 3, Issue 6
    Published in ” Natural Horse 3, 44-47, 2001 Volume 3, Issue 6 – Equissentials Photo: (bitless bridle?) TITLE: Who Needs Bits? With Dr. W. Robert Cook In today's horse world, we have a delightful trend toward keeping it natural while at the same time 'unnaturally' riding these powerful animals that once roamed free. Their natural instincts remain, but their amiable natures allow us to harness their power and enjoy the pleasure of their company. Riding or driving these magnificent creatures involves the risk of causing them harm by using, for example, ill-fitting saddles and harness. The knowledge we have gained from research, however, has enabled us to choose our equipment more wisely, with the horse's best interests in mind. Another area of equipment that has been researched is the bridle, or more particularly, the bit. The snaffle bit has come to be accepted as kind, with shank and port bits being regarded as unkind. But do we need a bit at all? When we have the likes of Pat Parelli and Robin Brueckmann achieving Olympic level riding without even a bridle, who needs bits? Furthermore, do bits actually cause harm? Veterinarian and researcher Dr. W. Robert Cook has uncovered some very interesting findings regarding the effects of the bit on the horse's mouth and also on the whole of the horse. What Dr. Cook has found is that a bit is actually detrimental, in various ways, from subtle to profound. His discoveries have led to the use of a new design of bitless bridle, which has been developed according to his specifications, to act upon the whole of the head, without causing the horse either pain or physiological confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Effective Population Size of Four Horse Breeds from Microsatellite DNA Markers in South-Central Mexico
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Newcastle University E-Prints Vázquez-Armijo JF, Parra-Bracamonte GM, Velazquez MA, Sifuentes-Rincón AM, Tinoco-Jaramillo JS, Ambriz-Morales P, Arellano-Vera W, Moreno- Medina VR. Diversity and effective population size of four horse breeds from microsatellite DNA markers in South-Central Mexico. Archives Animal Breeding 2017, 60(2), 137-143. Copyright: © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. DOI link to article: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-137-2017 Date deposited: 20/06/2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Arch. Anim. Breed., 60, 137–143, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-137-2017 Open Access © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Archives Animal Breeding Diversity and effective population size of four horse breeds from microsatellite DNA markers in South-Central Mexico José Fernando Vázquez-Armijo1, Gaspar Manuel Parra-Bracamonte2, Miguel Abraham Velazquez3, Ana María Sifuentes-Rincón2, José Luis Tinoco-Jaramillo4, Pascuala Ambriz-Morales2, Williams Arellano-Vera2, and Victor Ricardo Moreno-Medina2 1Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM). Km. 67.5 Carretera Federal Toluca-Tejupilco, Código Postal 51300, Temascaltepec, Estado de México, Mexico 2Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Boulevard del Maestro, esquina Elías Piña, Colonia Narciso Mendoza, Código Postal 88710, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico 3School of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK 4Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
    [Show full text]
  • Usefulness of the 17-Plex Str Kit for Bosnian Mountain Horse Genotyping
    UDC 575. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1902619R Original scientific paper USEFULNESS OF THE 17-PLEX STR KIT FOR BOSNIAN MOUNTAIN HORSE GENOTYPING Dunja RUKAVINA1*, Amir ZAHIROVIĆ2, Ćazim CRNKIĆ3, Mirela MAČKIĆ-ĐUROVIĆ4, Adaleta DURMIĆ-PAŠIĆ5, Belma KALAMUJIĆ STROIL5, Naris POJSKIĆ5 1*University of Sarajevo-Veterinary Faculty, Department of Biology, Sarajevo, B&H 2University of Sarajevo-Veterinary Faculty, Department of Internal Diseases, Sarajevo, B&H 3University of Sarajevo-Veterinary Faculty, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sarajevo, B&H 4University of Sarajevo-Faculty of Medicine, Center for Genetic, Sarajevo, B&H 5University of Sarajevo-Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Sarajevo, B&H Rukavina D., A. Zahirović, Ć. Crnkić, M. Mačkić-Đurović, A. Durmić-Pašić, B. Kalamujić Stroil, N. Pojskić (2019): Usefulness of the 17-plex STR kit for Bosnian mountain horse genotyping.- Genetika, Vol 51, No.2, 619-627. In the present study modern technology of DNA extraction and automatic genotyping was applied in Bosnian and Herzegovinian autochthonous horse breed by using 17-Plex horse genotyping kit. The study was aimed at investigating usefulness of the 17-plex STR Kit for Bosnian mountain horse genotyping and establishing highly useful microsatellite markers system for genetic diversity studies in Bosnian mountain horse breed. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood collected from 22 unrelated Bosnian mountain horse specimens. A total of 95 alleles were detected. Average number of detected alleles per locus was 5.588, varying from 3 (HTG7) to 10 (ASB17). Average effective number of alleles was 3.603, fluctuating from 1.789 (HMS7) to 5.728 (HMS2). The observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.136 (HMS3) to 0.909 (ASB2) with a mean of 0.631.
    [Show full text]
  • MIA Terra Cotta Horses, Celestial Horse and Tomb Retinue Horses.Pdf
    Terra Cotta Horses Funeral object 600 horse statues each horse different and unique, as were warriors tall but heavy in build likely Asiatic Wild Horse or Hequ horse Cavalry horse- Working horse, bred for speed and power Well groomed, mane, forelock and braided tail Attentive- eyes are alert, nostril are flared, potentially fierce The “Dragon” horse of legends. The attributes of a dragon embodied in a horse Saddle with no stirrups, balance and finesse of rider, plus manipulating a weapon while galloping across uneven terrain in a tight formation. Chariot horse- Sturdy and capable of pulling Smaller than cavalry horse Sets of four, must work well together The cavalry and war chariots had an extremely important place in ancient armies. Those examples excavated from the pit included steeds that were vigorous and fat. Their ears were erect, their eyes wide and mouths open, with smallish heads and relatively short legs. Some people say that these horses seem to resemble the Hequ Horses found in Gansu today or the Hetian Horses found in Xinjiang, which are excellent racehorses, good at climbing slopes, and also are excellent warhorses with great strength. Hequ horse Celestial Horses Funeral object 2002.45 @ MIA This magnificent statue of a young stallion represents one of the fabled "heavenly horses" of the Eastern Han dynasty (A.D. 25-220). Imported along the Silk Road from Ferghana in Central Asia, western horses were greatly admired for their strength, size, and endurance by the Han military and aristocracy. All members of Han elite owned horses for riding and to pull their beautifully appointed carriages.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Report
    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.
    [Show full text]
  • A.N.A.R.E.A.I
    A.N.A.R.E.A.I. ASSOCIAZIONE NAZIONALE ALLEVATORI DELLE RAZZE EQUINE ED ASININE ITALIANE Via XXIV Maggio n° 44/45 – 00187 - Roma – C.F. e P.IVA 15689641007 Cod. AUA (a cura di ANAREAI) DOMANDA ADESIONE A SOCIO (da spedire in ORIGINALE) ______________________________ Il sottoscritto ________________________________________________ nato il ______/______/______ a ____________________________________ Residente a _____________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Prov.___________________________ In Via ________________________________________ C.F. ___________________________________ In qualità di : Proprietario Conduttore Legale rappresentante dell’azienda: □ Ragione Sociale : Spazio per il timbro aziendale ___________________________________________ Sede Legale:_________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Allegare copia CCIAA P.Iva_______________________________________ C. Fiscale______________________________________ Ricevimento documenti fiscali indicare eventuale Codice Univoco _____________________________ □ Altro soggetto / Privato : C. Fiscale_________________________________________ e-mail*______________________________________ PEC *___________________________________ tel.*____________________________ cell.* ____________________________fax. ________________ Allevamento sito in Via/Loc* _____________________________________________ CAP* _________ Comune* _______________________________________________________ Prov.*_______________
    [Show full text]