DOCSLIB.ORG

Mosquitoes of Fort Campbell, Kentucky (Diptera: Culicidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mosquitoes of Fort Campbell, Kentucky (Diptera: Culicidae) Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, l5(l):1-3, 1999 Copyright O 1999 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. MOSQUITOES OF FORT CAMPBELL, KENTUCKY (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) JAMES P. MOORE The Center for Field Biology, Austin Peay State University, Clnrksvilte, TN 37044 ABSTRACT. A survey of the mosquito fauna of Fort Campbell, Kentucky (Christian County, Kentucky, and Montgomery County, Tennessee) was conducted from May 1996 to May 1998. A total of 528 mosquito colllction sites were sampled in the most comprehensive mosquito collection effort on the military installation since 1976. A total of 42 mosquito species were identified, including new locality records for 14 species. KEY WORDS Distribution, new records, military, Tennessee, U.S. Armv INTRODUCTION or without dry ice; and mechanical aspirator (Haushen's Machine Works, Toms River, NJ). Fort Campbell, Kentucky, an active U.S. Army Some larvae and pupae were reared to adults for installation, is located on the Tennessee-Kentucky identification. Larval and pupal specimenswere ex- border, 70 km northwest of Nashville. TN. The in- amined whole, or slide-mounted using CMC-10 stallation includes more than 425 ktr and is located media (Masters Chemical Co., Bensenville, IL) or within 4 counties, 2 in Kentucky and2 in Tennes- Canada balsam. Adult specimens were examined see.Fort Campbell is home to severallarge military unmounted or pin-mounted on paper points. Iden- units, including the lo1st Airborne Division (Air tification to specieslevel was made using standard Assault), the 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), light microscopy and the taxonomic referencesof and tlte l60th Special Operations Aviation Regi- Darsie and Ward (1981), Darsie (1986), Harrison ment (Airborne). The mission profiles of Fort and whitt (1996), and Reinert et al. (lgg7). Campbell military units include frequent trips to Locations of collection sites and solar and lunar distant locations, including Africa and Latin Amer- data were determinedby Global Positioning Satel- ica. For that purpose, the installation is also the lite (GPS) receivers. Additional solar and lunar data home of more than 300 military aircraft. The po- were provided by the 19th Air Support Operations tential for introduced speciesof mosquito, and their Squadron, U.S. Air Force, Fort Campbell. Field pathogens, must be considered a public health meteorological data were measured using a variety threat. Despite this situation, little effort has been of instruments. Soil and water temperatures at a made in recent years to document the species of depth of 10 cm and air temperatures at a height of mosquito that reside on Fort Campbell. 1 m were obtained using digital maximum-mini- From May 1996 to May 1998, a survey was con- mum thermometers. Relative humidity readings at ducted of the mosquito fauna of Fort Campbell. a height of 1 m were taken using a sling psychrom- This survey included 387 larval and pupal and 141 eter. Measurements of accumulated rainfall adult collection sites within were a 5o-km, area of the made using a rain gauge. installation (Christian County, Kentucky, and Montgomery County, Tennessee).This study area was selected for its diversity of habitat, its prox- RESULTS imity to human activities, and its lack of overhead Forty-two speciesbelonging to genera artillery fire or other hazardous military operations. 8 of mos- quitoes (Table 1) were collected during The study area included the cantonment area, fam- this survey, confirming the continued presence of 28 ily housing areas, open fields, wooded areas, species and establishing new locality records marshes,streams, and lakes. Larval mosquito hab- for an addi- tional 14 speciesof mosquito. The survey itats included permanentand temporary surface*a- failed to confirm the presenceof 11 other ters, tree holes, rock holes, and artificial containers. speciesthat were expected based on prior collections (U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Med- MATERIALS AND METHODS icine [CHPPM], personal communication; Bruce Harrison, North Carolina Department of Environ- I.arval and pupal collections were made by sev- ment :rnd Natural Resources [NCDENR], personal eral methodsbased on the habitat, including &pp"a communication),the report of Carpenter(1952), in- direct pour from small artificial containers. and the formation cited by Saugstad (1977), or the geo- siphon technique. Adult mosquitoes were collected graphical distribution maps of Darsie and Ward using sweep net; Centers for Disease Control (1981) and Reinerret al. (1997). (CDC)-style light traps (incandescentwhite light, The flrst major mosquito egg hatch of L99i oc- Model 1012, and fluorescentultraviolet light, Mod- curred during the first week of February, following el 1212, John W Hock Co., Gainesville, FL), with a'77-mm rainfall episode.Field conditions for the JoURNAL oF THE AMERTcANMoseuno CoNrnol AssocrlrroN VoL. 15, No. I Table 1. Mosquito taxa (Diptera: Culicidae) collected from May 1996 to May 1998, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Aedes (Aedes) cinereus Meigen' Culex (Culex) pipiens Linnaeus2 Aedes (Aedimorphus) vexans (Meigen) Culex (Culex) quinquefasciatus Say2 Aedes (Ochle rotatus) canadensis canadensis (Theobald) Culex (Culex) restuans Theobald Aedes (Ochlerotatus) dorsalis (Meigen) Culex (Culex) salinarius Coquillett Aedes (Ochlerotatus) dupreei (Coquillett)t Culex (Melanoconion) erraticus (Dyar and Knab) Aedes (Ochlerotatus) fulvus pallens Rossl Culex (Melanoconion) peccator Dyar and Knabt Aedes (Ochlerotatus) grossbecki Dyar and Knabr Culex (Neoculex) territans Walker Aedes (Ochlerotatus) infirmatus Dyar and Knabt Culiseta (Climacura) melanura (Coquillett)l Aedes (Ochlerotatus) sticticus (Meigen) Caliseta ( Culiseta) inomata (Williston)r Aedes (Ochlerotatus) tormentor Dyar and Knab O rthop o do my ia alba B aker Aedes (Ochlerotatus) trivittatus (Coquillett) O rthopodomyia si gnife ra (Coquillett) Aedes (Protomacleaya) hendersoni Cockerell' Psorophora (Grabhamia) columbiae (Dyar and Knab) Aedes (P rotomacleaya) trise riatus (Say) P sorophora (Grabhamia) discolo r (Coquillett) Aedes (Stegoniyia) aegypti (Linnaeus)! Psorophora (Janthinosoma) cyanescens (Coquillett) Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) P so rop ho ra (J ant hi no so ma) fe ro x (v on Humboldt) Anopheles (Anophele s) barbe ri Coquillett Psorophora (Janthinosoma) horrida (Dyar and Knab) Anophele s (Anopheles) c rucians Wiedemann P sorophora (P sorophora) ciliata (Fabic\rts) Anophele s (Anophele s) pe rplexens Ludlowl Psorophora (Psorophora) howardii Coquillettt Anophele s (Anopheles) punctipennis (Say) Toxorhync hite s (Lync hie lla) rutilus septentrionalis Anopheles (Anopheles) quadrimaculatus Say (Dyar and Knab) Anopheles (Anophele s) smaragdinus Reinertl U ranotaenia (U ranotaenia) sapphirina (Osten SackenT Anopheles (Anopheles) walkeri Theobaldr ' New locality record. ? Using the taxonomic reference of Darsie and Wrd (1981), the larvae and adults of Cx. pipiens and Cx. quinquefascutrs cannot be separated based on morphology. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, is located in a region of overlapping distributions for these species. week included a photoperiod of 10.5 h, air temper- Army during l9M and 1945 (Carpenter 1952) and ature from -1.8 to 17.2"C, relative humidity from by New Jersey light traps during 1963 to 1987 60 to 73Eo, soil temperature from 5.5 to 9.0'C, and (CHPPM, personal communication). Four of the l1 water temperature from 2.3 to 11.8'C. The initial species had been collected by New Jersey light species produced was Aedes vexans (Meigen), traps during 1963 to 1987 (CHPPM, personal com- which appeared in biting collections from late munication), including Aedes mitchellae (Dyar), March until mid-November. Other larval species Aedes sollicirans (Walker), Aedes taeniorhynchus produced during the first week of February includ- (Wiedemann), and Culex nigripalpus Theobald. ed Aedes sticticus (Meigen), Aedes canadensis Three species have never been collected on Fort canadensis (Theobald), Aedes infirmalzs Dyar and Campbell but were expected based on the geo- Knab, and Aedes grossbecki Dyar and Knab. graphical distribution maps of Darsie and Ward The most pestiferous species of mosquito on Fort (1981). These species include Aedes atropalpus Campbell, based on human-biting collections, were (Coquillett), Aedes thibaulti Dyar and Knab, and Ae. vexans, Aedes triseriarus (Say), Culex restuans Psorophora mathesoni Belkin and Heinemann. One Theobald, ard Psorophora ferox (von Humboldt). species, Aedes atlanticus Dyar and Knab, was ex- Bloodfeeding on humans by at least one of these 4 pected based on the maps of Darsie and Ward species occurred from late March until mid-No- (1981), and U.S. Army collection records. A por- vember. tion of the military records for Ae. atlanticus-tor- At 70 tree hole collection sites. Ae. triseriatus mentor was obtained under the Freedom of Infor- was the sole culicid occupant of 49Vo of the sites. mation Act (CHPPM, personal communication), Aedes triseriarzs shared its habitat with other spe- with additional records cited by Saugstad (1977) or cies of mosquitoes in another 6Vo of the sites. Or- provided by Bruce Harrison (personal communi- thopodomyia signiftra (Coquillett) and Toxorhyn- cation). Additionally, Anophe le s mav erlius Reinert, chites rutilus septentrionalis (Dyar and Knab) were a newly described species, was expected based on present in 16 and l47o of the tree holes, respec- the geographical distribution noted by Reinert et al. tively. Aedes albopictus (Skuse) was present
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years of Surveillance for Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus In
    Oliver et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:362 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2950-1 RESEARCH Open Access Twenty years of surveillance for Eastern equine encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in New York State from 1993 to 2012 JoAnne Oliver1,2*, Gary Lukacik3, John Kokas4, Scott R. Campbell5, Laura D. Kramer6,7, James A. Sherwood1 and John J. Howard1 Abstract Background: The year 1971 was the first time in New York State (NYS) that Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) was identified in mosquitoes, in Culiseta melanura and Culiseta morsitans. At that time, state and county health departments began surveillance for EEEV in mosquitoes. Methods: From 1993 to 2012, county health departments continued voluntary participation with the state health department in mosquito and arbovirus surveillance. Adult female mosquitoes were trapped, identified, and pooled. Mosquito pools were tested for EEEV by Vero cell culture each of the twenty years. Beginning in 2000, mosquito extracts and cell culture supernatant were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: During the years 1993 to 2012, EEEV was identified in: Culiseta melanura, Culiseta morsitans, Coquillettidia perturbans, Aedes canadensis (Ochlerotatus canadensis), Aedes vexans, Anopheles punctipennis, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Psorophora ferox, Culex salinarius, and Culex pipiens-restuans group. EEEV was detected in 427 adult mosquito pools of 107,156 pools tested totaling 3.96 million mosquitoes. Detections of EEEV occurred in three geographical regions of NYS: Sullivan County, Suffolk County, and the contiguous counties of Madison, Oneida, Onondaga and Oswego. Detections of EEEV in mosquitoes occurred every year from 2003 to 2012, inclusive. EEEV was not detected in 1995, and 1998 to 2002, inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies
    64 ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies - Greenwoods, Summer 1995 Wi~~iam L. Butts Expanded sampling of the area inunediately adj acent to the large bog ("Cranberry Bog") for anthrophilic mosquitoes was the main focus of studies at Greenwoods. Initial plans to conduct biting/alighting sampling from a boat at selected sites around the margin of the impoundment were abandoned due to logistical difficulties. Emergent and submerged obstructions made it impossible to move about by boat at a rate that would allow for sampling at a sufficient number of sites within the hours of feeding activity. It was also evident that repeated sampling by boat would cause an unacceptable level of disruption to aquatic vegetation. A series of eight sampling sites marked with bicolored streamers was established along the west side of the bog from the point of access to the main dam northward. A similar series was laid out along the east side with three sampling stations south of the one at the dock site and four stations north of it. Biting/alighting collections were made by the author sitting for 20 minutes at each site with one forearm exposed. Mosquitoes alighting upon that arm or at other points on the body within reach of the other arm were collected by inverting a small killing vial over the mosquitoes. Sampling series were begun at approximately first light and in late evening beginning at a time estimated to terminate the series when unaided visual observation became difficult. In most instances one side of the bog was sampled in the evening and the other side the following morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes in Ohio
    Mosquitoes in Ohio There are about 60 different species of mosquito in Ohio. Several of them are capable of transmitting serious, possibly even fatal diseases, such as mosquito-borne encephalitis and malaria to humans. Even in the absence of disease transmission, mosquito bites can result in allergic reactions producing significant discomfort and itching. In some cases excessive scratching can lead to bleeding, scabbing, and possibly even secondary infection. Children are very susceptible to this because they find it difficult to stop scratching. Frequently, they are outside playing and do not realize the extent of their exposure until it is too late. Female mosquitoes can produce a painful bite during feeding, and, in excessive numbers, can inhibit outdoor activities and lower property values. Mosquitoes can be a significant burden on animals, lowering productivity and efficiency of farm animals. Life Cycle Adult mosquitoes are small, fragile insects with slender bodies; one pair of narrow wings (tiny scales are attached to wing veins); and three pairs of long, slender legs. They vary in length from 3/16 to 1/2 inch. Mosquitoes have an elongate "beak" or piercing proboscis. Eggs are elongate, usually about 1/40 inch long, and dark brown to black near hatching. Larvae or "wigglers" are filter feeders that move with an S-shaped motion. Larvae undergo four growth stages called instars before they molt into the pupa or "tumbler" stage. Pupae are comma-shaped and non-feeding and appear to tumble through the water when disturbed. 1 Habits and Diseases Carried Mosquitoes may over-winter as eggs, fertilized adult females or larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Persistence of Novel Regional Variants of La Crosse Virus in the Northeast United States
    Local persistence of novel regional variants of La Crosse virus in the Northeast United States Gillian Eastwood ( [email protected] ) University of Leeds https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-7900 John J Shepard Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Michael J Misencik Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Theodore G Andreadis Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Philip M Armstrong Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Research Keywords: Arbovirus, Vector, Mosquito species, La Crosse virus, Pathogen persistence, Genetic distinction, Public Health risk Posted Date: October 14th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-61059/v2 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on November 11th, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04440-4. Page 1/16 Abstract Background: La Crosse virus [LACV] (genus Orthobunyavirus, family Peribunyaviridae) is a mosquito- borne virus that causes pediatric encephalitis and accounts for 50-150 human cases annually in the USA. Human cases occur primarily in the Midwest and Appalachian regions whereas documented human cases occur very rarely in the northeastern USA. Methods: Following detection of a LACV isolate from a eld-collected mosquito in Connecticut during 2005, we evaluated the prevalence of LACV infection in local mosquito populations and genetically characterized virus isolates to determine whether the virus is maintained focally in this region. Results: During 2018, we detected LACV in multiple species of mosquitoes, including those not previously associated with the virus. We also evaluated the phylogenetic relationship of LACV strains isolated from 2005-2018 in Connecticut and found that they formed a genetically homogeneous clade that was most similar to strains from New York State.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Infection in Cats
    Current Feline Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection in Cats Thank You to Our Generous Sponsors: Printed with an Education Grant from IDEXX Laboratories. Photomicrographs courtesy of Bayer HealthCare. © 2014 American Heartworm Society | PO Box 8266 | Wilmington, DE 19803-8266 | E-mail: [email protected] Current Feline Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection in Cats (revised October 2014) CONTENTS Click on the links below to navigate to each section. Preamble .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 EPIDEMIOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1. Urban heat island profile. BIOLOGY OF FELINE HEARTWORM INFECTION .................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. The heartworm life cycle. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF FELINE HEARTWORM DISEASE ................................................................................... 5 Figure 3. Microscopic lesions of HARD in the small pulmonary arterioles. Figure 4. Microscopic lesions of HARD in the alveoli. PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Clinical
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes and the Diseases They Transmit J
    B-6119 6-02 Mosquitoes and the Diseases they Transmit J. A. Jackman and J. K. Olson* osquitoes are among the most important The length of time that a mosquito takes to complete insect pests affecting the health of people its life cycle varies according to food availability, weath- er conditions and the species of mosquito. Under favor- and animals. Biting female mosquitoes not M able conditions, some mosquitoes can complete their only irritate people and animals, but they can also entire life cycle in only 8 to 10 days. transmit many disease-causing organisms. Egg Annoying populations of mosquitoes can occur any- where in Texas because there are habitats favorable for One way to identify mosquito species almost everywhere in the state. the breeding sites of mosquitoes is to find the To control mosquitoes effectively, it helps to under- eggs. Mosquito eggs may stand their life cycle, to be able to identify the various be laid in clusters called kinds of mosquitoes, and to know what steps work best rafts on the water sur- for the different species and specific locations. face. They may also be laid singly on the water Life history surface or in dry areas Adult mosquito laying eggs. Mosquitoes have four distinct stages during their life that are flooded periodi- cycle: egg, larva, pupa and adult. The adult stage is free- cally. flying; the other stages are aquatic. When first laid, mosquito eggs are white, but within a few hours they become dark brown to black. The shape and size of mosquito eggs vary, with most being football- shaped or boat-shaped and 0.02 to 0.04 inch long.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Equine Encephalitis Case Definition
    CASE DEFINITION FOR EASTERN EQUINE ENCEPHALITIS 1. General disease/pathogen information: Eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE) is a mosquito-borne viral disease that primarily affects horses. EEE, also known as sleeping sickness, is characterized by central nervous system dysfunction and a moderate to high case fatality rate. The causal virus is maintained in nature in an alternating infection cycle between mosquitoes and birds. Humans and horses serve as dead-end hosts. Although horses and humans are most often affected by the virus, birds may exhibit clinical signs, and infection and disease occasionally occurs in other livestock, deer, dogs, and a variety of mammalian, reptile, and amphibian species. 1.1. Etiologic agent: EEE is caused by the Eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus (EEEV), an Alphavirus of the family Togaviridae. It is closely related to the Western and Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis viruses and Highlands J virus, all of which cause similar neurological dysfunction disorders in horses. There are two distinct antigenic variants of EEEV. The North American variant is more pathogenic than the South and Central American variant. 1.2. Distribution/frequency of agent or pathogen in U.S.: EEEV is distributed throughout the Western Hemisphere. It has also been reported in the Caribbean Islands, Mexico, Central America, and South America. In North America, it is found in eastern Canada and all States in the United States east of the Mississippi River as well as Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas. EEEV is endemic in the Gulf of Mexico region of the United States. 1.3. Clinical signs: Horses infected with EEEV will initially develop fever, lethargy, and anorexia.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Transmission of Dirofilaria Immitis by Aedes
    48 J. Apr. Mosq. CoNrnol Assoc. Vor-.2, No. l NATURAL TRANSMISSION OF DIROFILARIAIMMITIS BY AEDESAEGYPTII C. M. HENDRIX', C. J. BRUNNER3 .qNoL. K. BELLAMY2 ABSTRACT. The Liverpool strain of the mosquito Ardasaegypti was infected with microfilariae of the canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, and was used to transmit heartworm larvae to three dogs. Methods of confirm- ing heartworm infection in these dogs included the rnodified Knott's test, a commercial enzymelinked- immunosorbent assay(ELISA), an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test, and post-mortem examination. INTRODUCTION ously into the canine definitive host (Tulloch et al. 1970, Kotani and Powers 1982). The pur- Ludlam et al. (1970) listed 63 speciesof mos- "complete pose of this experiment was to assessthe ability quitoes in which larval development of Ae. aegypti (Liverpool strain) to transmit in- of Dirofilaria immitis has been reported." Since fections of D. immiti,sto the dog. then, an additional 9 mosquito species capable of supporting larval development of D. immitis to the infective third larval stage within the MATERIALS AND METHODS head or proboscis have been reported (Crans RrrrrNr; TEcHNreuEs.The Liverpool strain and Feldlaufer 1974, Seeleyand Bickley 1974, of Ae. aegyptiwas provided by Dr. McCall, Weinrnann and Garcia 1974, Bickley 1976, John Athens, Georgia. Eggs oviposited on moisr cot- Christensen1977, Mosha and Magayuka 1979, ton batting were hatched in 22 x I I x 5 cm Rogers and Newson 1979, Acevedo 1982, Wal- white enarnelware pans containing distilled ters and Lavoipierre 1982). However, the capa- water at a depth of 4 crn. Food for larval devel- bility of transmitting infective third stage larvae opment was a mixture of I part rat chow, I part of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Surveillance Summary Sheet
    VECTOR SURVEILLANCE IN NEW JERSEY EEE, WNV, SLE and LAC Prepared by Lisa M. Reed, Scott Crans and Mark Robson Center for Vector Biology, Rutgers University CDC WEEK 24: Beginning 8 June to 14 June, 2014 Data Downloaded 12:35 am 16 June 2014 This New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station report is supported by Rutgers University, Hatch funds, funding from the NJ State Mosquito Control Commission and with the participation of the Department of Health, Department of Agriculture and of the 21 county mosquito control agencies of New Jersey. Culiseta melanura and Eastern Equine Encephalitis Inland Historic Current Total Total Pools EEE SITE/Boxes or Population Weekly Tested* Tested* Isolation MFIR Coastal Mean Mean (Collected) (Submitted) Pools Bass River (Burlington Co.)/5 Coastal 0.10 0.00 1 1 Green Bank (Burlington Co.)/25 Coastal 2.03 0.68 23 (40) 2 (3) Corbin City (Atlantic Co.)/25 Coastal 1.17 nd 37 2 Dennisville (Cape May Co.)/50 Coastal 4.61 0.36 29 2 Winslow (Camden Co.)/50 Inland 5.07 1.82 231 5 Centerton (Salem Co.)/50 Inland 1.56 0.72 79 2 Turkey Swamp (Monmouth Co.)/50 Inland 0.55 0.02 14 (15) 2 (3) Glassboro (Gloucester Co.)/50 Inland 0.63 1.98 120 3 *Current week (in parentheses) results pending. Remarks: No EEE activity has been detected in any mosquitoes or vertebrates sampled to date in New Jersey. Cs. melanura activity remains moderate in most areas (see page 3 population graphs). Traditional Resting Box Sites: To date, 534 Cs. melanura form 19 pools have been tested for EEE.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Ecology of Vectors of Jamestown Canyon Virus: Seasonal Succession of Hematophagous Diptera at Kingsbury State Fish and Wildlife Area, Laporte County, Indiana 1982 Robert D. Boromisa and Paul R. Grimstad Department of Biology University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Introduction This paper is the initial report of arthropod collections made as a part of a long-term investigation into the ecology of vectors of Jamestown Canyon virus (JCV) in the upper Midwest. A primary goal is to identify the arthropod vector(s) of JCV in the natural disease cycle. Jamestown Canyon is a serotype of Melao virus (Family Bunyaviridae) of the California Serogroup, and has recently been shown to cause viral encephalitis in humans (4). White-tailed deer are considered to be the primary host of the virus (6). Despite the fact that virus isolations have been made from many areas of the United States (4), little is really known about the natural disease cycle of JCV. Before any vector can be identified, we need to know which arthropods are present at the study site, in what numbers, and at what time of the season they are present. An earlier serosurvey of Indiana residents (5) had identified a number of JCV foci of infection in northern Indiana, especially in the Kingsbury area. We anticipated that collections from that region would furnish hematophagous arthropods for virus isolation. The collection of bloodfed specimens would also enable us to identify bloodmeal sources and establish host-vector relationships. This report will describe the seasonal succession of numerous species of hematophagous Diptera collected at Kingsbury in the summer of 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting United States Heartworm Dirofilaria Immitis Prevalence in Dogs Dwight D
    Bowman et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:540 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1804-y RESEARCH Open Access Forecasting United States heartworm Dirofilaria immitis prevalence in dogs Dwight D. Bowman1, Yan Liu2, Christopher S. McMahan2, Shila K. Nordone3, Michael J. Yabsley4 and Robert B. Lund2* Abstract Background: This paper forecasts next year’s canine heartworm prevalence in the United States from 16 climate, geographic and societal factors. The forecast’s construction and an assessment of its performance are described. Methods: The forecast is based on a spatial-temporal conditional autoregressive model fitted to over 31 million antigen heartworm tests conducted in the 48 contiguous United States during 2011–2015. The forecast uses county-level data on 16 predictive factors, including temperature, precipitation, median household income, local forest and surface water coverage, and presence/absence of eight mosquito species. Non-static factors are extrapolated into the forthcoming year with various statistical methods. The fitted model and factor extrapolations are used to estimate next year’s regional prevalence. Results: The correlation between the observed and model-estimated county-by-county heartworm prevalence for the 5-year period 2011–2015 is 0.727, demonstrating reasonable model accuracy. The correlation between 2015 observed and forecasted county-by-county heartworm prevalence is 0.940, demonstrating significant skill and showing that heartworm prevalence can be forecasted reasonably accurately. Conclusions: The forecast presented herein can a priori alert veterinarians to areas expected to see higher than normal heartworm activity. The proposed methods may prove useful for forecasting other diseases. Keywords: Autoregression, CAR Model, Head-banging, Heartworm, Kriging, Prevalence, Spatio-temporal correlation Background include exercise intolerance, coughing, dyspnea, cachexia, Heartworm disease, caused by the mosquito-borne filarial anorexia, epistaxis and ascites.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Connecticut Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE) Plan
    State of Connecticut Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE) Response Plan Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Department of Public Health Introduction This 2020 Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE) response plan describes EEE ecology and disease, surveillance activities conducted by collaborating agencies, assessment of transmission risk, prevention strategies, and communications during periods of increased disease risk. EEE is a virus spread by mosquitoes and although rare presents a serious risk to human health. Outbreaks of EEE have occurred sporadically among horses and domestic pheasants in Connecticut since 1938. Since 2000, five cases of EEE in humans have been identified in Connecticut, one in 2013 and four in 2019; the 2013 case and three of the 2019 cases were fatal. The plan describes a progression of response to EEE based on assessment of transmission risk. The state’s mosquito monitoring and management effort is a collaboration involving the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), the Department of Public Health (DPH), the Department of Agriculture, and the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (CAES), and the Connecticut Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory (CVMDL). Together, these agencies conduct mosquito, human, and veterinary surveillance. Surveillance data are used to monitor trends, detect increased transmission risk, and implement a phased response. The purpose of this plan is to provide guidance for risk assessment, prevention activities, communication, and community action. Recommended actions are limited to those that are warranted by the specific extent of the potential threat to human health. This plan does not address long-term, municipal planning activities. Agency Roles • DEEP is responsible for the systematic identification and monitoring of mosquito breeding sites, the provision of technical assistance to municipalities and private property owners regarding mosquito control, and the collection and communication of information and data.
    [Show full text]