DOCSLIB.ORG

Construcción Del Puente Vehicular Y Accesos “Chamacua”, Construcción De Obras De Drenaje, Trabajos Diversos, Terraplén De Los Accesos Y Señalamiento

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Construcción Del Puente Vehicular Y Accesos “Chamacua”, Construcción De Obras De Drenaje, Trabajos Diversos, Terraplén De Los Accesos Y Señalamiento Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra MANIFESTACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL MODALIDAD PARTICULAR CONSTRUCCION DEL PUENTE VEHICULAR Y ACCESOS: “CHAMACUA” TRAMO: KM 5+ 200 MUNICIPIO DE COYUCA DE CATALAN, GRO. CAPITULO 1 I. DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO, DEL PROMOVENTE Y DEL RESPONSABLE DEL ESTUDIO JUSTIFICATIVO 1 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra I.1 DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO Figura 1. Camino actual de terracería en las márgenes del río Chamacua (Amuco). Punto en el cual se pretende construir el Puente Chamacua, Municipio de Coyuca de Catalán La presente Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental, se refiere a la construcción de un puente, el cual facilitará la comunicación entre diferentes localidades; dicho puente se construirá sobre el Río Chamacua; en el tramo Coyuca de Catalán – San Juan Chamacua – San Juan de la Cruz. Actualmente el cruce se realiza pasando directamente por el cuerpo de agua existente ya que no existe un puente en la zona, los vehículos pasan por éste 2 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra provocando la contaminación del agua, la cual es de buena calidad ya que no presenta elevadas descargas residuales de drenaje o fabricas y es usada para consumo humano y riego por los pobladores cercanos. El Río Chamacua durante la época de lluvias en los meses de julio a septiembre donde se registran mayor precipitación, eleva su cauce y no permite el tránsito de vehículos hacía otros pueblos, por lo que es necesario tener un paso permanente. Se determino la construcción del puente en ese sitio por que es la que presenta mejores alternativas para su buen funcionamiento y de acuerdo a los estudios realizados es la mejor alternativa (la elección del sitio se baso en datos geológicos, geomorfológicos, estratigráficos, hidrológicos). La construcción del puente facilitará el cruce durante todo el año y se evitará la constante contaminación de este importante cuerpo de agua. Tipo de proyecto: Construcción del un Puente Vehicular y Accesos Sector: Comunicaciones y transportes Subsector: Infraestructura Carretera del Estado de Guerrero I.1.1 Nombre del proyecto ´´ Construcción del Puente Vehicular y accesos “Chamacua”, construcción de obras de drenaje, trabajos diversos, terraplén de los accesos y señalamiento. Coyuca de Catalán – San Juan Chamacua – San Juan de la Cruz, en el Estado de Guerrero ´´. Longitud puente: 153.36 m Accesos: 40 m cada uno (ver planta general anexa) Longitud total del puente con accesos: 233.36 3 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra I.1.2 Ubicación del proyecto El proyecto de Construcción del Puente se ubica dentro de la región Tierra Caliente del estado de Guerrero. La región Tierra caliente, es una de las siete regiones económicas que conforman el estado de Guerrero. Se ubica al Noreste del estado, colindando al norte con el Estado de Michoacán y el Estado de México, al Noreste Con el Estado de México y la región Norte, al Noroeste con el Estado de Michoacán, al Oeste con la Región Costa Grande, al Este con la región Norte Centro y al Sur con la región Costa Grande. Figura 2. Ubicación regional del proyecto Los municipios que conforman la Región Tierra Caliente son 9, Ajuchitlàn del progreso, Arcelia, Coyuca de Catalán, Cutzamala de pinzón, Pungarabato, San Miguel Totolapan, Tlalchapa, Tlapehuala y Ziràndaro de los Chávez. 4 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra El proyecto de modernización se ubica entre los municipios de Pungarabato (050), Zirándaro (073), Ajuchitlán del Progreso (003), Coahuayutla (016), Tecpan de Galeana (057), Petatlan (048), José Azueta (038) y el Edo. De Michoacán de Ocampo. 22 22 Coyuca de Catalán Figura 3. Ubicación municipal del proyecto La región tierra caliente esta en un punto importante de desarrollo, desafortunadamente su infraestructura actual hace muy complicada la comunicación directa entre poblaciones cercanas. Presenta cercanía con el 5 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra estado de México y Michoacán pero las vías de acceso hacen que dicha cercanía se vuelva imposible de recorrer en corto tiempo. El gobierno actual considera una inversión importante en el desarrollo y mejoramiento de las vías de comunicación, lo cual beneficia a poblaciones que están aisladas por falta de infraestructura. El puente actual es producto de la gestión durante varios años de los pobladores beneficiados. El gobierno federal a través de la SCT Guerrero ha destinado recursos para que esta obra se lleve a cabo durante este año. 6 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra San Juan de Chamacua San Juan de la Cruz El Rincón de Chamacua Chamacua Puente Chamacua de Michilena Figura 4. Ubicación puntual del proyecto 7 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra El proyecto se ubica en las coordenadas 18° 16´ 02.17´´ N y 100° 40´ 32.6´´ O, a 270 msnm dentro del municipio de Coyuca de Catalán., Estado de Guerrero (Figura 3). I.1.3 Tiempo de vida útil del proyecto Una vez realizado el Puente Chamacua. La vida útil del mismo dependerá de la calidad de materiales empleados durante su construcción, así como del cumplimiento de las especificaciones que rigen la construcción de este tipo de Puentes y del mantenimiento del mismo. El tiempo estimado de vida útil del presente proyecto es de 40 años. 8 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra 1.2 Datos del promovente: Nombre o razón social O. P. D. CICAEG. Comisión de Infraestructura Carretera y Aeroportuaria del Edo. de Gro. Registro federal de contribuyentes OPD 010601 599 Nombre y cargo del representante legal Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG Dirección del promovente o de su representante legal DATOS PROTEGIDOS POR LA LFTAIPG I.2.4 Nombre de la empresa contratista: Nombre o razón social Ingeniería civil, construcción y proyectos, S.A. de C. V. Registro federal de contribuyentes R. F. C. ICC-020402 5D7 Nombre y cargo del representante legal Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG Dirección de la empresa contratista Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG 9 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V. ICCYPSA Construcción Proyectos Topografía Terracerías Mecanica de Suelos Impacto Ambiental Edificación Ingeniería de Taller Supervisión de Obra I.3 Datos del responsable del presente estudio ambiental: Nombre o razón social Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG Registro federal de contribuyente o curp Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG Nombre del responsable técnico del estudio Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG Dirección del responsable técnico del estudio Protección de datos personales LFTAIPG 10 Venustiano Carranza No. 89, Col. Cabecera Municipal, Mpio. de Chimalhuacan, Edo. De México. C.P. 56330, Tel. 01 (55) 50-44-33-98 Fax. 01 (55) 50-44-31-72 e-mail.: [email protected] Ingeniería Civil, Construcción y Proyectos, S.A. de C.V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 136, 37 pages 28 August 2020 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS TAXONOMIC REVISION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF PHASSODES BETHUNE -B AKER , 1905 (L EPIDOPTERA : H EPIALIDAE ), GHOST MOTH DESCENDANTS OF A SUBDUCTION ZONE WEED IN THE SOUTH -WEST PACIFIC JOHN R. G REHAN & C ARLOS G.C. M IELKE BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Cover illustration: Selection of scales from central forewing of Phassodes spp. (see page 14). Photos by James Boone, Miho Maeda, and Agnes Stubblefield. Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu - ESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The R Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (eISSN 2376-3191) is a series of UBLICATIONS OF short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sci - P ences. BISHOP MUSEUM The Bishop Museum Press also published the Bishop Museum Bulletin series. It was begun in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the Pacific. In 1987, the Bulletin series was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (eISSN 2376-3132) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (eISSN 2376-3078) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (eISSN 2376-3124) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (eISSN 2376-3213) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (eISSN 2376-3159) To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi - cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History eISSN 2376-3191 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Published online: 28 August 2020 ISSN (online) 2376-3191 Taxonomic revision and biogeography of Phassodes Bethune-Baker, 1905 (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae), ghost moth descendants of a subduc - tion zone weed in the south-west Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera). Record 1
    Number 36: 1–8 ISSN 1026–051X December 1996 TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE FAR EASTERN HEPIALI- DAE (LEPIDOPTERA). RECORD 1. ON SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF THE PHYMATOPUS TAXA DESCRIBED FROM THE EAST PALAEARCTIC Yuri A. Tshistjakov Institute of Biology and Pedology, Vladivostok-22, 690022, Russia Two taxa – hecticus O.Bang-Haas, 1927 and japonicus Inoue, 1982 till now regarded as subspecies of Phymatopus hectus (Linnaeus, 1758) are separated from the latter as distinct species. A new subspecies Phymatopus hecticus albomaculatus ssp. n. is described from Russia (Primorskii krai or Primorye territory). The diag- nostic features of all discussed taxa in forewing pattern and in male genitalia are presented in the key. КEY WORDS: Hepialidae, Phymatopus hecticus albomaculatus ssp.n., taxonomy, East Palaearctic. Ю.А.Чистяков. Таксономическое изучение дальневосточных Hepia- lidae (Lepidoptera). Сообщение 1. О систематическом положении таксонов Phymatopus, описанных из Восточной Палеарктики // Дальневоcточный энтомолог. 1996. N 36. P. 1-8. Два таксона – hecticus O.Bang-Haas, 1927 и japonicus Inoue, 1982, описанные как подвиды Phymatopus hectus (Linnaeus, 1758), выделяются в качестве самостоятельных видов. Из Приморского края описан новый 1 подвид Phymatopus hecticus albomaculatus ssp. n. Приводится определительная таблица обсуждаемых таксонов, построенная на признаках рисунка их крыльев и строения гениталий самцов. Биолого–почвенный институт, Дальневосточное отделение Российской Академии наук, Владивосток-22, 690022, Россия. INTRODUCTION The genus Phymatopus Wallengren, 1869 so far is considered to be monotypic, comprising the eurasian species Ph. hectus (Linnaeus, 1758), divisible into a number of subspecies (de Freina & Witt, 1990). Two of them have been known to occur in the Eastern Palaearctic: Ph. hectus hecticus O. Bang-Haas in the East Siberia (East Sayan Mountains, Tunkinskie Goltzy or Tunkinskie Alps Range) and Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Species Recorded SCOTLAND
    SYSTEMATIC LIST of SPECIES RECORDED SCOTLAND Highlands & Inner Hebrides (Western Isles) - June 10-23, 2017 The 1st number is the highest number of that species seen in one day The 2nd number is the number of days that that species was seen during the 14-day trip BIRDS GEESE, SWANS & DUCKS Anatidae Greylag Goose Anser anser ! Widespread on the short grass meadows in the highlands and along the coast in the Western Isles. 200/9 Canada Goose Branta canadensis ! Small flocks on Mull and along the western coast. 25/5 Mute Swan Cygnus olor ! A few around the western coast. 2/4 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus ! One, unexpected, on Loch Poit Nah-L near Fionnphort. 1/1 Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna ! A few seen on the Yathan Estuary in the Highlands and on Mull and Skye. 4/6 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope ! 2 in a flooded field pond near the Broomhill Bridge, not far from Nethybridge. 2/1 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos ! Widespread, seen daily. 10/14 Common Teal Anas crecca ! Small groups seen in a couple of spots in the Highlands and on the Ardnamurchan Peninsula. 5/3 Tufted Duck! Aythya fuligula ! A number on Loch Shiel and Loch Laide. 10/3 King Eider Somateria spectabilis ! A drake amongst the Common Eiders on the Ythan Estuary, that has been there for many years! 1/1 Common Eider Somateria mollissima ! Hundreds on the Ytahn Estuary and widespread on the western isles and coast. 300/7 Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula ! A female in Nethybridge, and 3 on the River Spey at the Broomhill Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Scottish Macro Moth List
    SCOTTISH MACRO-MOTH LIST, 2017 Vernacular Name Code Taxon UK Status Scottish status Scottish Trend since 1980 Orange Swift 3.001 Triodia sylvina Common Widespread but local stable Common Swift 3.002 Korscheltellus lupulina Common Common S, scarce or absent N stable Map-winged Swift 3.003 Korscheltellus fusconebulosa Local Common stable Gold Swift 3.004 Phymatopus hecta Local Common stable Ghost Moth 3.005 Hepialus humuli Common Common stable Goat Moth 50.001 Cossus cossus Nb Scarce and very local, mainly Highlands stable? Lunar Hornet Moth 52.003 Sesia bembeciformis Common Widespread but overlooked? decline - G. S. Woodpecker predation? Welsh Clearwing 52.005 Synanthedon scoliaeformis RDB Very local in Highlands stable Large Red-belted Clearwing 52.007 Synanthedon culiciformis Nb Widespread but overlooked? stable Red-tipped Clearwing 52.008 Synanthedon formicaeformis Nb Dumfries & Galloway, last seen in 1942 extinct, or overlooked? Currant Clearwing 52.013 Synanthedon tipuliformis Nb SE only? Still present VC82 in 2014 major decline Thrift Clearwing 52.016 Pyropteron muscaeformis Nb SW & NE coasts, very local stable Forester 54.002 Adscita statices Local Very local, W and SW stable? Transparent Burnet 54.004 Zygaena purpuralis Na Very local, west Highlands stable Slender Scotch Burnet 54.005 Zygaena loti RDB Mull only stable Mountain Burnet 54.006 Zygaena exulans RDB Very local, VC92 stable New Forest Burnet 54.007 Zygaena viciae RDB, protected Very local, W coast fluctuates Six-spot Burnet 54.008 Zygaena filipendulae Common Common but mainly coastal range expansion NW, also inland Narrow-bordered Five-spot Burnet 54.009 Zygaena lonicerae Common SE, spreading; VC73; ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Hepialidae: Endoclita, Palpifer, and Hepialiscus)
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa fs dedfcated to bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally by publfshfng peer-revfewed arfcles onlfne every month at a reasonably rapfd rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org . All arfcles publfshed fn JoTT are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Internafonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon, and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa Bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Communfcatfon Forest ghost moth fauna of northeastern Indfa (Lepfdoptera: Hepfalfdae: Endoclfta , Palpffer , and Hepfalfscus ) John R. Grehan & Vfjay Anand Ismavel 26 March 2017 | Vol. 9| No. 3 | Pp. 9940–9955 10.11609/jot. 3030 .9. 3.9940-9955 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT.asp For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes.asp For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct.asp For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2017 | 9(3): 9940–9955 Forest ghost moth fauna of northeastern India Communication (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae: Endoclita, Palpifer, and Hepialiscus) 1 2 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) John R. Grehan & Vijay Anand Ismavel ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1 Research Associate, Section of Invertebrate Zoology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, OPEN ACCESS 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA 2 Makunda Christian Hospital, Bazaricherra, Karimganj District, Assam 788727, India 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected] Abstract: Taxonomic and biological information is reviewed for the forest Hepialidae of northeastern India, a poorly known group of moths in a region known for the global significance of its biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales Moth List 2019
    Wales Moth List (Provisional) A list of all the moth species known to have been recorded in Wales, including species that have been recorded rarely or once only, and which may not have resident breeding populations in Wales. Includes records that may be historic only and species that are now thought to be extinct in Wales (e.g. Conformist). Compiled by Butterfly Conservation Wales using lists supplied by County Moth Recorders. Complete with records up to and including 2019 (2019 new records marked as such). Covers the 13 Welsh vice-counties: Monmouthshire (VC35), Glamorgan (VC41), Breconshire (VC42), Radnorshire (VC43), Carmarthenshire (VC44), Pembrokeshire (VC45), Cardiganshire (VC46), Montgomeryshire (VC47), Merionethshire (VC48), Caernarvonshire (VC49), Denbighshire (VC50), Flintshire (VC51) & Anglesey (VC52). U = Unsupported. These are moth records which are not supported by a full record and hence may be missing from the county datasets, despite being present on MBGBI maps. List order follows Agassiz, Beavan and Heckford (ABH) Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles (2013) and including recent changes to the list. Bradley & Fletcher (B&F) numbers are also provided. Names are based on the ABH chcklist; for the micro-moths some additional English names in regular use are also included. ABH No. B&F No. Scientific Name English Name Welsh Name vice-countiesNo. Monmouthshire Glamorgan Breconshire Radnorshire Carmarthenshire Pembrokeshire Cardiganshire Montgomeryshire Merionethshire Caernarvonshire Denbighshire Flintshire Anglesey
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Moniioring Scheme
    MOTH MONIIORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre 1/1/1/ National Boord of Waters and the Environment Nordic Council of Ministers /////// Helsinki 1 994 Environmental Report 8 MOTH MONITORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre National Board of Waters and the Environment Helsinki 1994 Published by Environment Data Centre (EDC) National Board of Waters and the Environment P.O.BOX 250 FIN—001 01 Helsinki FINLAND Tel. +358—0—73 14 4211 Fax. +358—0—7314 4280 Internet address: [email protected] Edited by Guy Söderman, EDC Technical editng by Päivi Tahvanainen, EDC This handbook has been circulated for comments to the members of the project group for moth monitoring in the Nordic countries under the auspices of the Monitoring and Data Group of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Cover photo © Tarla Söderman Checking of installation of light trap at Vilsandi National Park in Estonia. Printed by Painotalo MIKTOR Ky, Helsinki 1 994 ISBN 951—47—9982—8 ISSN 0788—3765 CONTENTS .4 INTRODUCTION 5 PART 1: OBJECTIVES 7 1 Short term objectives 7 2 Medium-long term objectives 8 3 Additional objectives 8 4 Specific goals 9 5 Network design 9 5.1 Geographical coverage 9 5.2 Biotopes coverage 10 PART II: METRODOLOGY 11 1 Technical equipments and use 11 1.1 Structure of Iight traps 11 1.2 Field installation 13 1.3 Structure ofbait trap 14 1.4 Documentation of sites 15 1.5 Timing the light traps 15 1.6 Sampling procedures 15 2 Sample handling 16 2.1 Prestoring 16 2.2 Posting 16
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OJS at Oregondigital.org (Oregon State University / University of Oregon) Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Hepialidae Stephens, 1829 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. H., P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Hepialidae Stephens, 1829. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2) (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4590 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann et. al., 2017) - a national collaborative effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Hepialidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version, entitled, OSAC_Heplialidae_2019_ver_beta will be replaced in the near future with an official release (OSAC_Hepialidae_2019_ver_1.0), which will then also be archived as a supplemental file to this publication. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were made by Jon Shepard with reference to an unpublished key to the PNW Hepialidae Wagner (1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Metabarcoding Malaise Traps and Soil Edna Reveals Seasonal and Local Arthropod Diversity Shifts Ameli Kirse1*, Sarah J
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Metabarcoding Malaise traps and soil eDNA reveals seasonal and local arthropod diversity shifts Ameli Kirse1*, Sarah J. Bourlat1, Kathrin Langen1 & Vera G. Fonseca1,2* Forest habitats host enormous diversity, but little is known about the seasonal turnover of arthropod species between the above- and below ground forest layers. In this study, we used metabarcoding approaches to uncover arthropod diversity in diferent forest types and seasons. Our study shows that metabarcoding soil eDNA and Malaise trap bulk samples can provide valuable insights into the phenology and life cycles of arthropods. We found major diferences in arthropod species diversity between soil samples and Malaise traps, with only 11.8% species overlap. Higher diversity levels were found in Malaise traps in summer whereas soil samples showed a diversity peak in winter, highlighting the seasonal habitat preferences and life strategies of arthropods. We conclude that collecting time series of bulk arthropod samples and eDNA in the same locations provides a more complete picture of local arthropod diversity and turnover rates and may provide valuable information on climate induced phenological shifts for long-term monitoring. Forests are known to be one of the most diverse habitats on earth, providing a vast range of ecological niches, resulting in outstanding arthropod diversity 1. Forests can be roughly divided into two habitats: the ground and the above ground layer, with both closely linked to each other by mutual relationships of the associated abiotic and biotic environment2. Some studies have shown how biotic interactions in soil can regulate the structure and functioning of aboveground communities.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY and ENVIRONMENT of NEW ROAD, LITTLE LONDON and NEIGHBOURING COUNTRYSIDE by Dr Paul Sterry Contents: 1
    BIODIVERSITY AND ENVIRONMENT OF NEW ROAD, LITTLE LONDON AND NEIGHBOURING COUNTRYSIDE by Dr Paul Sterry Contents: 1. Summary. 2. A brief history. 3. Notable habitats alongside New Road and in the neighbouring countryside. 4. Protected and notable species found on New Road and in the surrounding countryside. Appendix 1 - Historical land use in Little London and its influence on biodiversity. Appendix 2 - Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths) recorded on New Road, Little London 2004-2019 (generalised OS Grid Reference SU6159). Appendix 3 - Ageing Hedgerows. About the author : Paul Sterry has BSc and PhD in Zoology and Ecology from Imperial College, London. After 5 years as a Research Fellow at the University of Sussex working on freshwater ecology he embarked on a freelance career as a wildlife author and photographer. Over the last 35 years he has written and illustrated more than 50 books, concentrating mainly on British Wildlife, with the emphasis on photographic field guides. Best-selling titles include Collins Complete British Trees, Collins Complete British Wildlife and Collins Life-size Birds. Above: Barn Owl flying over grassland in the neighbourhood of New Road. 1. Summary Located in the Parish of Pamber, Little London is a Biodiversity hotspot with New Road at its environmental heart. Despite the name New Road is one of the oldest highways in the village and this is reflected in the range of wildlife found along its length, and in the countryside bordering it. New Road has significance for wildlife far beyond is narrow, single-track status. Its ancient hedgerows and adjacent meadows are rich in wildlife but of equal importance is its role as a corridor of wildlife connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • OHBR Annotated Checklist: Butterflies & Moths
    1 OHBR Annotated Checklist: Butterflies & Moths Outer Hebrides Annotated Checklist: Butterflies & Moths Over 2500 species have been recorded in the British Isles and so far, 552 moths and 17 butterflies appear in the Outer Hebrides checklist. This is not a definitive list; it does not include species recorded in literature or in museum collections, and although moths and butterflies are well documented in comparison with other insects, we are still adding new species to the list. This annotated version of the checklist has been created for biological recorders to provide additional information on the status and recorded flight times of the species within the islands. Species which are flagged in red require care in their identification and additional information may be required from the recorder if the record is submitted to OHBR. If you record a species not currently listed, and submit your record to OHBR you will be requested to supply further information on how the species was identified to enable us to verify the record. Please note that some species can only be identified by dissection We would like to acknowledge the contribution made by John Kemp in revising this checklist and for his advice on the current status of a number of species. Flight Times ABH Bradley Family Species Vernacular Name Status Comment Earliest Latest Micropterigidae 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella (Scopoli, 1763) Yellow-barred Gold Rare, two records, SU & BE 25-May 14-Jun 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella (Scopoli, 1763) White-barred Gold Small numbers 06-Jun 13-Jul
    [Show full text]
  • East Devon Pebblebed Heaths Providing Space for Nature Biodiversity Audit 2016 Space for Nature Report: East Devon Pebblebed Heaths
    East Devon Pebblebed Heaths East Devon Pebblebed Providing Space for East Devon Nature Pebblebed Heaths Providing Space for Nature Dr. Samuel G. M. Bridgewater and Lesley M. Kerry Biodiversity Audit 2016 Site of Special Scientific Interest Special Area of Conservation Special Protection Area Biodiversity Audit 2016 Space for Nature Report: East Devon Pebblebed Heaths Contents Introduction by 22nd Baron Clinton . 4 Methodology . 23 Designations . 24 Acknowledgements . 6 European Legislation and European Protected Species and Habitats. 25 Summary . 7 Species of Principal Importance and Introduction . 11 Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species . 25 Geology . 13 Birds of Conservation Concern . 26 Biodiversity studies . 13 Endangered, Nationally Notable and Nationally Scarce Species . 26 Vegetation . 13 The Nature of Devon: A Biodiversity Birds . 13 and Geodiversity Action Plan . 26 Mammals . 14 Reptiles . 14 Results and Discussion . 27 Butterflies. 14 Species diversity . 28 Odonata . 14 Heathland versus non-heathland specialists . 30 Other Invertebrates . 15 Conservation Designations . 31 Conservation Status . 15 Ecosystem Services . 31 Ownership of ‘the Commons’ and management . 16 Future Priorities . 32 Cultural Significance . 16 Vegetation and Plant Life . 33 Recreation . 16 Existing Condition of the SSSI . 35 Military training . 17 Brief characterisation of the vegetation Archaeology . 17 communities . 37 Threats . 18 The flora of the Pebblebed Heaths . 38 Military and recreational pressure . 18 Plants of conservation significance . 38 Climate Change . 18 Invasive Plants . 41 Acid and nitrogen deposition. 18 Funding and Management Change . 19 Appendix 1. List of Vascular Plant Species . 42 Management . 19 Appendix 2. List of Ferns, Horsetails and Clubmosses . 58 Scrub Clearance . 20 Grazing . 20 Appendix 3. List of Bryophytes . 58 Mowing and Flailing .
    [Show full text]