CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. March 10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. March 10 1776 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. MARcH 10, H. Owen and ofW. W. Welch-severally to the Committee on Wax braces some six or seven hundred miles of road under one control, Claims. and, talring it in connection with its control of the Georgia road, By Mr. A.. HERR SMITH: The petition of soldiers and sailors of more than that. That is all worked in connection with the expor­ the late war for an increase of pension to all pensioners who lost an tation of productions at Savannah. The Louisville and Nashville arm and leg while in the line of duty-to the Committee on Invalid system, which is very prominent and controls probably some two Pensions. thousand miles of road, or more, works in harmony with the Central. By Mr. STONE: The petition of Patrick McDonald, to be placed That combination of roads naturally looks to Savannah as an outlet on the retired list-to the Committee on Military Affairs. for a great deal of the produce that is shipped over its lines. There By Mr. TALBOTT: Papers relating to the claim of Alexander M. is then the line by way of'the Georgia and Cent.ral, through Atlanta Templeton-to the Committee on War Claims. over the Stat.e Road~ as it is called, by the Nashville, Chattanoo~a By Mr. URNER: Papers relating to the claim of Robertson Topp antl Saint Louis, al o connecting with the Louisville and Nashviue and William L. Vance-to the same committee. Road to the western cities. There are the same connections up to By Mr. VAN A.ERNili: The petition of soldiers and sailors of the Chattanooga and then connecting with the Cincinnati Southern, all late war, for an increase of pension to all pensioners who lost an arm pointing to the same object. There is also the line from Chattanoo~a and leg while in the line of duty-to the Committee on Invalid Pen­ to Memphis, Tennessee, connecting the Mississippi River with tne sions. same lines of road. In addition to that, there is what is called the By Mr. V A.NCE: A. petition for an increase of pension to oldiers Cole-Seney Syndicate, which now controls over two thou ·and miles and sailors of the late war who lost an arm or a leg while in the line of road, including its connection with the roads of what is called the of duty-to the same committee. Norfolk and \Vestern. That is building two additional links, one Also, the petition ofWilliam M. Moore, for relief-to the Committee from Rome, Georgia, to Atlanta, and the other from Atlanta to l\Iacon, on War Claims. which will soon be completed, and gives them a direct connection Ey Mr. WALTER A. WOOD: The petition of 40 citizens of Sand both with Savannah and Brunswick, Georgia. All of the e- connec­ Hill, New York, for the repeal of the tax on bank deposits and the tions by rail point to the port of Savannah as an Otitlet. lienee it is two-cent stamp on bank checks and drafts-to the Committee on that there is such a large collection of the cotton of the South, run­ Ways and Means. ning up to seven or eight hundred thou and bales a year, and going out through the port of Savannah. This presents the Southern view of the subject, but the great West­ SENATE. ern States are almost as much interested in that port as we are of the South. During several mouths of winter, when the canals are frozen FRIDAY, March 10, 1882. over, the Western States are dependent, as matters now stand, almo t exclusively upon the three great trunk lines for the transportation of Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev. J. J. BULLOCK, D. D. all the productions of the West that seek an outlet through tlle east­ The J onrnal of yesterday's proceedings was read and approved. ern cities; and many a time it happens that those three trunk lines ADJOURNME:NT TO 1\'fO~AY. a.re not able to transport the productions anything like a fast as it On motion of Mr. CAMERON, of Wisconsin, it was is desired by shippers that they should be transported. Ordered, Th~tt when the Senate a~ourn to-lby, it adjou.rn to meet on Monday The e rnilroad connections which I have ju t mentioned form next. nnother grancl outlet for the western productions and for goods going MESSAGE FRO:\>! TilE HOUSE. from New York to the West through the port of Savannah, either to A message ft·om the House of Representatives, by Mr. .McPHER­ foreign ports or to New York, as near from the \Vest as the trunk lines soN, its Clerk, announced that the House had passed the following are t-o New York from the West. \Vhen I say" as near" I mean a bill and joint resolution; in which it requested the concurrence of uem·, calculating it as we calculat-e on transportation lines, connect­ the Senate: ing land and water lines together. In other wortls, co nut ~our miles A bill (H. R. No. 4466) making appropriations for the Agricultural of railroarl, and then count on the ocean (where the road Is built by Department of the Government for the fiscal year ending June :30, nature and you only have to put on the rolling stock, so to speak, or 1883, and for other purposes; and the steamers) four miles of ocean for one of rail, and yon have from A joint resolution (H. R. No. 140) to print certain cnlogies deliv­ the city of Memphis, from the city of Saint Louis, from the city of ered in Congress upon the late Michael P. O'Connor. Louisville, and from t.he city of Cincinnati a line toNew York through Savannah as near and for some one or two of the cities mentioned EXECUTIVE COMMU:N1CATION • nearer than the trunk lines I have mentioned by which the produc­ The PRESIDENT p1·o tempore laid before the Senate a communica­ tions of the West are usually shipped to New York. Hence the open­ tion from the Secretary of \Var, transmitting, in response to a redolu­ ing of the harbor of Savannah, so a.s to make the channel deep enough tion of Jannary9, 1882, information as to the additional works neces­ that ships of large size can go in and ont, opens for the West another sary at the Falls of the Ohio River to complete the improvements great competing line equal to either of the three great trunk lines thereof; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and for the exportation of the commerce of the West not only to foreign ordered to be printed. 11orts but directly through New York. This is a very great matter The PRESIDENT pro tempore also laid before the Scnat.e a commu­ to the West as well as to the South. nication from the Secretary of War, transmitting reports from Cap­ What would it cost to do itT The port of Savannah is a peculiar tain A.. N. Damrell, Corps of Engineers, of examinations and snrve~ s one. The water on the bar is twenty-six feet in depth at high tide. made in compliance with the requirements in the river and harbor It ueeds no improvement. There are twenty miles of river, however, act of March 3, 1881, at certain localities in the States of !<'lorida between the bar and the city. A.t the' clo e of the war they bad all :md Mississippi; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, been obstructed by timber and sail vessels sunk in it so as to keep and ordered to be printed. out the gunbon.ts. That obstruction had to be removed. After it The PRESIDENT pro tempm·e also laid before the Senate a com­ was removed and a system of improvement of the harbor h:l.d been munication from the Secretary of War~ transmitting reports from the commenced, it was found that there were only about thirteen or four­ Uuited States engineer officers showing the maintenance of the chan­ teen feet ofwaterthere. The engineers adopted a syst.em of improve­ nel at South Pass, Mi sissippi River, dnringthe four quarters ending ment of the channel, which with the meagerappropriationsheretoforo l<'ebruary 1:3, 1882; which was referred to the Committee on the Im­ made has increased t.he depth to from eighteen to nineteen feet at provement of the Mississippi River and Tributaries, and ordered to high tide. be printed. In the river n,nd harbor act of last year the Engineer Corps was DIPROVEMENT OF SA V A.."'<XAII II ARBOR. instructed to make a farther survey with a view to deepening the Mr. BROWN. I present a petition of a number of the leading channel to twe-nty-two feet, which would let in large ves els. That bankers, merchants, and other prominent citizens of the city of At­ survey has been made with great care, and the report is that the Ju,nta, Georgia, praying that an adequate appropriation be made for channel for the twenty miles from the city of Savannah down to the the improvement of the harbor of Savannah. I ask the indul&'ence bar, which bar .i.s deep enou~h, can be made twenty-two feet deep for of the Senate while I submit a few remarks in connection witn the , 700,000; and the engineers report earnestly urges that $350,000 of petition.
Recommended publications
  • How to Read the Bill History Page Hb 2480
    HOW TO READ THE BILL HISTORY PAGE This tutorial will show you how to read the bill information and history page for a bill. This page and the next show the bill history for HB 2480 from the 2007-08 legislative session as it appears on the webpage. Beginning on page 3 this bill history is shown with a detailed explanation of what each line means. HB 2480 - 2007-08 (What is this?) Concerning public transportation fares. Sponsors: Clibborn, McIntire, Simpson Companion Bill: SB 6353 Go to documents. Go to videos. Bill History 2008 REGULAR SESSION Dec 21 Prefiled for introduction. Jan 14 First reading, referred to Transportation. (View Original Bill) Jan 17 Public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. Jan 29 Executive action taken in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. TR - Executive action taken by committee. TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass. (View 1st Substitute) Minority; do not pass. Feb 1 Passed to Rules Committee for second reading. Feb 12 Made eligible to be placed on second reading. Feb 13 Placed on second reading. Feb 14 1st substitute bill substituted (TR 08). (View 1st Substitute) Floor amendment(s) adopted. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading. Third reading, passed; yeas, 84; nays, 10; absent, 0; excused, 4. (View Roll Calls) (View 1st Engrossed) IN THE SENATE Feb 16 First reading, referred to Transportation. Feb 20 Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM. Feb 26 Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 497 16 October 2009 No. 125 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 16 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 551 16 OCTOBER 2009 552 Solicitor-General to make a statement about the Yvonne House of Commons Fletcher case? It emerged last night that, two years ago, a senior lawyer carried out an independent review of Friday 16 October 2009 the case for the Crown Prosecution Service in which he said that the two Libyans involved could be charged for conspiracy to cause death. Neither had diplomatic The House met at half-past Nine o’clock immunity; they escaped from the Libyan embassy. The report made it clear that both those men played an instrumental role in the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher. PRAYERS Last night, as I said, it emerged that the Crown Prosecution Service had confirmed that, two years on, The Second Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means took the police had still not provided it with the final case file the Chair as Deputy Speaker (Standing Order No. 3). containing the admissible evidence. Surely the Home Secretary should make a statement explaining why the NEW WRIT Metropolitan police are sitting on that vital evidence, Ordered, and to put our minds at rest by assuring us that Britain’s That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the trade interests are not being put before the interests of Crown, to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to bringing criminals to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing the History of the Bill of Rights
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2019 From Appendix to Heart: Tracing the History of the Bill of Rights Lael Weinberger Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Weinberger, Lael, "From Appendix to Heart: Tracing the History of the Bill of Rights" (2019). Constitutional Commentary. 1202. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/1202 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 07 WEINBERGER_FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 12/23/2019 10:24 AM FROM APPENDIX TO HEART: TRACING THE HISTORY OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS THE HEART OF THE CONSTITUTION: HOW THE BILL OF RIGHTS BECAME THE BILL OF RIGHTS. Gerard N. Magliocca.1 New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. xii + 235. $29.95 (Hardcover). Lael Weinberger2 I. INTRODUCTION: THE THINGS WE TAKE FOR GRANTED The upper level of the National Archives museum features three documents, grandly presented in a marble rotunda: the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. When the hall is open for visitors, the documents are displayed behind bulletproof glass and constantly attended by guards; at night, the documents are stored still more securely in a bomb-proof vault.3 “In this Rotunda are the most cherished material possessions of a great and good nation,” President George W. Bush said in 2003 at an event reopening the hall after a major renovation.4 Every branch of government was represented at the event, offering encomiums to the documents enshrined in the hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Catchy Title
    Addressing Tomorrow’s Terrorists Andrew Peterson* American anti-terrorism laws are insufficient to address the next wave of global terrorism. When President Bush declared that the United States had begun a “war on terror,”1 the entire government began to reorient itself to tackle America’s newest “generational challenge.”2 The Department of Justice (DOJ) joined this massive effort, declaring in a new Strategic Plan that its focus was not simply to prosecute terrorists for crimes, but to “[p]revent, disrupt, and defeat terrorist operations before they occur.”3 Despite its constant talk of reorientation, however, DOJ has been limited in its ability to creatively address the war on terror for one simple reason: many of the relevant federal criminal statutes are poorly constructed. Prior to September 1994, there were no federal criminal prohibitions that specifically punished material support for terrorism. Prosecutors had to rely instead on generic federal crimes, such as murder and money laundering, or on a variety of statutes condemning specific acts of terrorism, such as air piracy or hostage taking. After the 1993 terrorist bombing of the World Trade Center, this situation rapidly changed. Legislators hastily drafted a number of statutes and amendments that sought to address the domestic terrorist threat. Acting in response to public demand for quick, decisive action, Congress generally maximized the scope of anti-terror prohibitions while overriding any legal obstacles to quick prosecution that were presented by the judiciary. Although it is difficult to fault Congress for acting decisively, the bedrock of counterterrorism enforcement laid down by these statutes is deeply flawed.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 80
    Calendar No. 80 113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 113–40 BORDER SECURITY, ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, AND IMMIGRATION MODERNIZATION ACT JUNE 7, 2013.—Ordered to be printed Mr. LEAHY, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following R E P O R T together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS [To accompany S. 744] The Committee on the Judiciary, to which was referred the bill (S. 744), to provide for comprehensive immigration reform, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon, with an amendment, and recommends that the bill, as amended, do pass. CONTENTS Page I. Background and Purpose of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act ........................................................ 1 II. History of the Bill and Committee Consideration ....................................... 22 III. Section-by-Section Summary of the Bill ...................................................... 75 IV. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate ................................................ 161 V. Regulatory Impact Evaluation ...................................................................... 161 VI. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 161 VII. Additional and Minority Views ..................................................................... 163 VIII. Changes to Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ........................... 186 I. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE BORDER SECURITY, ECONOMIC
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Birth of the Bill of Rights by Robert Allen Rutland
    19561 BOOK REVIEWS The Birth of the Bill of Rights. By Robert Allen Rutland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1955. Pp. 243. $5.00. The federal Bill of Rights is one of the most cherished documents in our national hagiography. Its clauses have been invoked by contending parties in every crisis of our history. Every sort of minority interest has sought se- curity in its generous phrases. Its meaning has long been the subject of in- tense controversy among lawyers and judges. The judicial gloss upon its words and phrases has attained enormous proportions. Yet in spite of all this, surprisingly little scholarly work has been done on the history of the Bill of Rights.1 The interest of American historians in constitutional history, once so pronounced, seems to have spent itself. Such newer pastures as those of in- tellectual and business history appear to be greener. It is a long time since our historians have produced a significant new work in the field of constitu- tional history. Political scientists and legal scholars are gradually moving in to fill the vacuum.2 We have had, of course, a number of historical studies of particular aspects of civil liberties,3 but we have never had a thorough, criti- cal, substantial, scholarly study of the origins of the American Bill of Rights. In fact, Rutland's treatise, The Birth of the Bill of Rights, is, to my knowl- edge, the first book-length study by a historical scholar ever written on the subject. While Rutland should be given credit for making the attempt, his book does not by any means fill this gap in historical scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwelliana
    CROMWELLIANA Published by The Cromwell Association, a registered charity, this Cromwelliana annual journal of Civil War and Cromwellian studies contains articles, book reviews, a bibliography and other comments, contributions and III Series papers. Details of availability and prices of both this edition and previous editions of Cromwelliana are available on our website: The Journal of www.olivercromwell.org. The 2018 Cromwelliana Cromwell Association The Cr The omwell Association omwell No 1 ‘promoting our understanding of the 17th century’ 2018 The Cromwell Association The Cromwell Museum 01480 708008 Grammar School Walk President: Professor PETER GAUNT, PhD, FRHistS Huntingdon www.cromwellmuseum.org PE29 3LF Vice Presidents: PAT BARNES Rt Hon FRANK DOBSON, PC Rt Hon STEPHEN DORRELL, PC The Cromwell Museum is in the former Huntingdon Grammar School Dr PATRICK LITTLE, PhD, FRHistS where Cromwell received his early education. The Cromwell Trust and Professor JOHN MORRILL, DPhil, FBA, FRHistS Museum are dedicated to preserving and communicating the assets, legacy Rt Hon the LORD NASEBY, PC and times of Oliver Cromwell. In addition to the permanent collection the Dr STEPHEN K. ROBERTS, PhD, FSA, FRHistS museum has a programme of changing temporary exhibitions and activities. Professor BLAIR WORDEN, FBA Opening times Chairman: JOHN GOLDSMITH Honorary Secretary: JOHN NEWLAND April – October Honorary Treasurer: GEOFFREY BUSH Membership Officer PAUL ROBBINS 11.00am – 3.30pm, Tuesday – Sunday The Cromwell Association was formed in 1937 and is a registered charity (reg no. November – March 1132954). The purpose of the Association is to advance the education of the public 1.30pm – 3.30pm, Tuesday – Sunday (11.00am – 3.30pm Saturday) in both the life and legacy of Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658), politician, soldier and statesman, and the wider history of the seventeenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • BWISC Bulletin June 2009
    EARLIEST RECORDED COVER FROM TURKS ISLANDS BY RICHARD FODEN FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 Datelined 21 July 1804 BULLETIN No. 224 March 2010 Affiliated to the Association of British Philatelic Societies and the American Philatelic Society ISSN 0953–8720 BRITISH WEST INDIES STUDY CIRCLE OBJECTS 1 TO promote interest in and the study of the stamps and postal history of the islands that comprise the British West Indies and in addition BERMUDA, BRITISH GUIANA (GUYANA) and BRITISH HONDURAS (BELIZE) and the Postal History and markings of all other Caribbean territories during any period that they were under British administration or control, and those British Post Offices which operated in the Caribbean, and Central or South America. 2 TO issue a quarterly BULLETIN containing articles, items of interest and other features. 3 TO loan books from the Circle library (home members only). Borrowers bear postage both ways. 4 TO publicise 'wants' and furnish opinions on stamp(s) and/or cover(s) for a nominal fee. 5 TO encourage, assist or sponsor the authorship and publication of definitive handbooks, monographs or other works of reference appropriate to the aim in paragraph 1 above. Opinions expressed in articles in this Bulletin are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the BWISC, its Editor, or its Officers. OFFICERS & CONTACT DETAILS Web Site: www.bwisc.org Founder: P.T. Saunders, FRPSL President: E.V. Toeg, FRPSL Vice-Presidents: Charles Freeland, FRPSL: Ob Batterieweg 45, CH-4059 Basel, Switzerland Tel. 0041 61 361 1205, e-mail: [email protected] Simon Goldblatt: 39 Essex Street, London, WC2R 3AT Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Obituaries –D-E-F-G- H- Lawrence Co., Ohio Researched by Sharon M
    Abstracts of Obituaries –D-E-F-G- H- Lawrence Co., Ohio researched by Sharon M. Kouns ABSTRACTS OF OBITUARIES, DEATH NOTICES, ETC. OF LAWRENCE COUNTY (OHIO) PEOPLE AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES COMPILED BY SHARON MILICH KOUNS Updated last: October 10, 1997 IR = IRONTON REGISTER SWI = SEMI WEEKLY IRONTONIAN IDR = IRONTON DAILY REGISTER IT =IRONTON TRIBUNE MI = MORNING IRONTONIAN IET = IRONTON EVENING TRIBUNE IJRN = IRONTON JOURNAL IR Sept. 29, 1887 Remember, obituaries are charged half a cent a word, cash to accompany the order. Watch this. Also, remember that all anonymous communications will be thrown in the waste basket. Some of these obituaries are quite long in their actual form and have been condensed for this publication. Thank you, Sharon Kouns. completed July 29, 1852 -July 20, 1854 deaths & marriages completed July 19, 1860 - Oct. 18, 1860 deaths & marriages on computer completed July 24, 1856 - July 15, 1858 deaths & marriages on computer completed Jan. 14, 1858 - Mar. 25, 1858 deaths & marriage completed deaths from Ironton Journal Sept. 1, 1869 through December 28, 1870 -D- Daily, Soloman - IR Nov. 24, 1887 - Marriage license issued to Soloman Daily and Minerva Markins. Dale, Edward R. - IR Aug. 17, 1899 - Last Saturday, Mr. Edward R. Dale, of Marietta, the husband of Mrs. C. C. Clarke's sister, died suddenly on a railroad train that had left Boston that morning, bound north. Mr. Dale was traveling with his wife and three children. died of heart disease. Funeral at Marietta. Dalton, Andrew I. - IR Oct. 06, 1853 - Married on the 25th ult., in Perry Twp., by P. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 148
    Calendar No. 148 110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 110–66 WAR PROFITEERING PREVENTION ACT OF 2007 Mr. LEAHY, from the Committee on Judiciary, submitted the following R E P O R T together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [To accompany S. 119] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on the Judiciary, to which was referred the bill (S. 119) to prohibit profiteering and fraud relating to military ac- tion, relief, and reconstruction efforts, and for other purposes, re- ports favorably thereon with amendments, and recommends that the bill, as amended, do pass. CONTENTS Page I. Purpose of the War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 ........................... 1 II. History of the Bill and Committee Consideration ....................................... 4 III. Section-by-Section Summary of the Bill ...................................................... 5 IV. Cost Estimate ................................................................................................. 6 V. Regulatory Impact Evaluation ...................................................................... 7 VI. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 7 VII. Additional Views of Senator Sessions .......................................................... 7 VIII. Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill as Reported ............................ 10 I. PURPOSE OF THE WAR PROFITEERING PREVENTION ACT OF 2007 Chairman Patrick Leahy introduced the War Profiteering Pre- vention Act
    [Show full text]
  • No. 23, Winter 2014
    No. 23 Winter 2014 From the President New Director of Academics he appointment of Dr. Jeffry Morrison he James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation is as Director of Academics is the most extremely pleased to name Dr. Jeffry Morrison, Associate significant news of 2013. His academic TProfessor of Government at Regent University, as the T Foundation’s third Director of Academics. Succeeding Dr. credentials coupled with his many years of work with the Foundation ensure that current James Banner (1991-1995) and Dr. Herman Belz (1995-2013), and future Fellows will be intellectually Professor Morrison brings to the Foundation a wealth of scholarly challenged, academically supported, and work, extensive teaching experience, and a deep understanding professionally enriched as they pursue their of the mission and activities of the Foundation. degrees. Dr. Morrison, who graduated with distinction from Boston College We are pleased to announce that the 2014 and received his Ph.D. at Georgetown, has taught at Regent Summer Institute will again be directed by University since 2001, where in 2007 he received the Chancellor’s Dr. Morrison. Joining him are Dr. Daniel Award as the University Professor of the Year. He has also held Dreisbach, Dr. Marion Nelson, and Dr. Kevin teaching positions at Georgetown, Princeton, and the US Air Hardwick, a professor at James Madison Force Academy. He is co-editor of The Founders on God and University and a former member of the Government (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), John Witherspoon Summer Institute faculty from 2002 to 2008. and the Founding of the American Republic (University of Notre Dame Press, 2005), and The Political Philosophy of George Washington (Johns Hopkins University New outreach initiatives in 2013 included Press, 2009).
    [Show full text]