DOCSLIB.ORG

Calendar No. 80

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calendar No. 80 Calendar No. 80 113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 113–40 BORDER SECURITY, ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, AND IMMIGRATION MODERNIZATION ACT JUNE 7, 2013.—Ordered to be printed Mr. LEAHY, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following R E P O R T together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS [To accompany S. 744] The Committee on the Judiciary, to which was referred the bill (S. 744), to provide for comprehensive immigration reform, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon, with an amendment, and recommends that the bill, as amended, do pass. CONTENTS Page I. Background and Purpose of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act ........................................................ 1 II. History of the Bill and Committee Consideration ....................................... 22 III. Section-by-Section Summary of the Bill ...................................................... 75 IV. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate ................................................ 161 V. Regulatory Impact Evaluation ...................................................................... 161 VI. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 161 VII. Additional and Minority Views ..................................................................... 163 VIII. Changes to Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ........................... 186 I. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE BORDER SECURITY, ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, AND IMMIGRATION MODERNIZATION ACT OF A. PURPOSE OF THE BILL Few policy issues are as central to the history and character of America as immigration. The foundation of the Nation, and its fu- 29–010 VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:47 Jun 12, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR040.XXX SR040 PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS 2 ture promise, was laid by men and women who came to America’s shores from around the world. Immigration is the history of all Americans who are not indigenous to the territory of the United States. It is an issue of enormous importance to all Americans. Notwithstanding diverse viewpoints on the best path forward, there is broad recognition that America’s current system of immi- gration is broken and in need of significant reform. There are many aspects of Federal immigration law that are in need of improvement. But there may be no issue more central to the legislative proposal upon which the Committee has acted than the estimated 11 million individuals living in the United States in undocumented status.1 The Senate Judiciary Committee has ap- proved legislation that addresses this situation in a fair, tough, practical, and humane way. With the approval of this legislation, the Senate Judiciary Committee has begun the process of effecting these reforms and creating an immigration system for the 21st Century. 1. Creating an Earned Path to Citizenship One of the key components of the Border Security, Economic Op- portunity and Immigration Modernization Act (S. 744) is the path to earned citizenship for the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living and working in the shadows of American society. This legislation will give this population a tough but fair oppor- tunity to come forward and earn their citizenship by meeting sev- eral requirements, including paying fees and fines, passing na- tional security and criminal background checks, paying their taxes, and learning English. During the Committee’s consideration of S. 744, and its extensive study and consideration of comprehensive immigration reform in previous Congresses, the Committee has heard from law enforce- ment officials, community leaders, faith groups, civil rights groups, and individual members of the public about the urgent need to ad- dress the millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States. Undocumented immigrants have a tenuous place in our communities. They live in constant fear of deportation. If they are victims of crime, they often do not report those crimes to State and local law enforcement.2 They work for low wages, unable to de- fend themselves from employer harassment and exploitation.3 Many have been in the country for 10 years or more, have made valuable contributions to their communities, and have immediate relatives who are American citizens.4 The prospect of deporting 1 DEP’TOFHOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION STAT., ESTIMATES OF THE UNAU- THORIZED IMMIGRANT POPULATION RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES: JANUARY 2011 (March 2012) available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ ois_ill_pe_2011.pdf. 2 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, UNDER SIEGE: LIFE FOR LOW-INCOME LATINOS IN THE SOUTH 25 (2009) (noting the vulnerability for undocumented immigrants in the South and across the United States due to fears of deportation and low confidence in law enforcement) available at http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/under-siege-life-for-low-in- come-latinos-in-the-south#.UazxQ5yGcd0. 3 REBECCA SMIGH & EUNICE HYUNHYE CHO, NAT’L EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, WORKER’S RIGHTS ON ICE: HOW IMMIGRATION REFORM CAN STOP RETALIATION AND ADVANCE LABOR RIGHTS (2013) available at http://www.nelp.org/page/-/Justice/2013/Workers-Rights-on-ICE-Retalia- tion-Report.pdf?nocdn=1. 4 According to the latest publicly available estimates, approximately 86 percent of undocu- mented immigrants arrived in the United States before 2005. See DEP’TOFHOMELAND SECU- RITY, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION STAT., ESTIMATES OF THE UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANT POPULATION VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:47 Jun 12, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR040.XXX SR040 PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS 3 these individuals would not only be prohibitively expensive,5 but would also have untold damaging effects on our economy, which re- lies on the work, taxes, and purchasing power of undocumented im- migrants even as our legal system fails to fully recognize or protect them. It would separate families and run counter to our ideals as a Nation. Instead, S. 744 outlines a tough but fair path that will bring individuals out of the shadows and into the lawful immigra- tion system, by allowing eligible applicants to adjust to the legal status of Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI). The most recent legislative attempt to create a path to citizen- ship was the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), a law that legalized three million undocumented immigrants and created employer sanctions against hiring undocumented workers.6 The hope was that IRCA would offer a long-term solution to the problem of illegal immigration.7 Legalization was meant to de- crease the undocumented population and prevent its expansion. Employer sanctions were expected to deter future illegal immigra- tion by drying up the job magnet that drew unauthorized workers to the United States. Under IRCA, undocumented individuals who had been continu- ously present in the United States since January 1, 1982 (almost five years before the date of enactment) and who met certain other requirements could apply for temporary permanent resident sta- tus.8 Upon learning English, meeting other requirements, and ap- plying within a prescribed time period, they could then become lawful permanent residents.9 Even though three million undocumented immigrants obtained legalization under IRCA, gaps in the law kept large numbers of the undocumented population underground and in long-term limbo. The early cutoff date included in that legislation left almost five years’ worth of arrivals without the ability to legalize. Vague statu- tory language, combined with restrictive interpretations by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), led to exten- sive litigation that prolonged the legalization program for more than 20 years.10 Moreover, the IRCA legalization program did not account for the spouses and children of legalized immigrants,11 which created a strong incentive for many to enter or remain in the country illegally to keep their families together. Establishing a tough but fair path to bring undocumented indi- viduals out of the shadows and into the lawful immigration system will benefit American workers and our society as a whole. Studies of the 1986 immigration reform law found that legalizing pre- viously undocumented workers increased wages by close to 10 per- RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES: JANUARY 2011 (March 2012) available at http:// www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ois_ill_pe_2011.pdf. 5 MARSHALL FITZETAL., CENTER FOR AM. PROGRESS, THE COSTS OF MASS DEPORTATION: IM- PRACTICAL, EXPENSIVE, AND INEFFECTIVE (2010), available at http://www.americanprogress.org/ wp-content/uploads/issues/2010/03/pdf/cost_of_deportation.pdf. 6 Pub. L. No. 99–603, 100 Stat.3359. 7 Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, H.R. Rep No. 99–682(I), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 46 (1986); See also McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., 498 U.S. 479, n. 4 (1991). 8 8 U.S.C. § 1255A(a) (2008). 9 Id. at § 1255A(b). 10 See LUCAS GUTTENTAG, A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO JUDICIAL REVIEW IN RELATION TO IRCA LEGISLATION (Yale Law School Workshop Series Readings, Fall 2009), available at http:// www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Clinics/Immigration_Reading5.pdf. 11 The former INS established a ‘‘Family Fairness’’ program and in 1990 Congress added stat- utory relief for the spouses and children of legalized aliens, but that relief was extremely lim- ited. SEE Immigration and Nationality Act of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Life As an Undocumented Immigrant ­ Nytimes.Com
    6/10/2015 My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant ­ NYTimes.com Magazine My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant By JOSE ANTONIO VARGAS JUNE 22, 2011 One August morning nearly two decades ago, my mother woke me and put me in a cab. She handed me a jacket. “Baka malamig doon” were among the few words she said. (“It might be cold there.”) When I arrived at the Philippines’ Ninoy Aquino International Airport with her, my aunt and a family friend, I was introduced to a man I’d never seen. They told me he was my uncle. He held my hand as I boarded an airplane for the first time. It was 1993, and I was 12. My mother wanted to give me a better life, so she sent me thousands of miles away to live with her parents in America — my grandfather (Lolo in Tagalog) and grandmother (Lola). After I arrived in Mountain View, Calif., in the San Francisco Bay Area, I entered sixth grade and quickly grew to love my new home, family and culture. I discovered a passion for language, though it was hard to learn the difference between formal English and American slang. One of my early memories is of a freckled kid in middle school asking me, “What’s up?” I replied, “The sky,” and he and a couple of other kids laughed. I won the eighth­grade spelling bee by memorizing words I couldn’t properly pronounce. (The winning word was “indefatigable.”) One day when I was 16, I rode my bike to the nearby D.M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    Nos. 18-587, 18-588, and 18-589 In the Supreme Court of the United States DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOINT APPENDIX (VOLUME 2) NOEL J. FRANCISCO ROBERT ALLEN LONG, JR. Covington & Burling, LLP Solicitor General Department of Justice One CityCenter Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 850 Tenth St., N.W. [email protected] Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 514-2217 [email protected] (202) 662-5612 Counsel of Record Counsel of Record for Petitioners for Respondents Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano (No. 18-587) PETITIONS FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI FILED: NOV. 5, 2018 CERTIORARI GRANTED: JUNE 28, 2019 Additional Captions and Counsel Listed on Inside Cover DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, ACTING SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MARTIN JONATHAN BATALLA VIDAL, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Additional Counsel For Respondents THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. MICHAEL JAMES MONGAN Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Solicitor General LLP California Department of 333 South Grand Ave. Justice Los Angeles, CA. 90071 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000 [email protected] San Francisco, CA. 94102 (213) 229-7804 [email protected] (415) 510-3920 Counsel of Record Counsel of Record for Respondents for Respondents Dulce Garcia, Miriam States of California, Maine, Gonzalez Avila, Saul Maryland, and Minnesota Jimenez Suarez, Viridiana (No.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read the Bill History Page Hb 2480
    HOW TO READ THE BILL HISTORY PAGE This tutorial will show you how to read the bill information and history page for a bill. This page and the next show the bill history for HB 2480 from the 2007-08 legislative session as it appears on the webpage. Beginning on page 3 this bill history is shown with a detailed explanation of what each line means. HB 2480 - 2007-08 (What is this?) Concerning public transportation fares. Sponsors: Clibborn, McIntire, Simpson Companion Bill: SB 6353 Go to documents. Go to videos. Bill History 2008 REGULAR SESSION Dec 21 Prefiled for introduction. Jan 14 First reading, referred to Transportation. (View Original Bill) Jan 17 Public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. Jan 29 Executive action taken in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. TR - Executive action taken by committee. TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass. (View 1st Substitute) Minority; do not pass. Feb 1 Passed to Rules Committee for second reading. Feb 12 Made eligible to be placed on second reading. Feb 13 Placed on second reading. Feb 14 1st substitute bill substituted (TR 08). (View 1st Substitute) Floor amendment(s) adopted. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading. Third reading, passed; yeas, 84; nays, 10; absent, 0; excused, 4. (View Roll Calls) (View 1st Engrossed) IN THE SENATE Feb 16 First reading, referred to Transportation. Feb 20 Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM. Feb 26 Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Do We Still Want Privacy in the Information Age? Marvin Gordon
    Do we still want privacy in the information age? Marvin Gordon-Lickey PROLOGUE All those who can remember how we lived before 1970 can readily appreciate the many benefits we now enjoy that spring from the invention of digital computing. The computer and its offspring, the internet, have profoundly changed our lives. For the most part the changes have been for the better, and they have enhanced democracy. But we know from history that such large scale transformations in the way we live are bound to cause some collateral damage. And the computer revolution has been no exception. One particular casualty stands out starkly above the sea of benefits: we are in danger of losing our privacy. In the near future it will become technically possible for businesses, governments and other institutions to observe and record all the important details of our personal lives, our whereabouts, our buying habits, our income, our social and religious activities and our family life. It will be possible to track everyone, not just suspected criminals or terrorists. Even now, information about us is being detected, stored, sorted and analyzed by machine and on a vast scale at low cost. Information flows freely at light speed around the world. Spying is being automated. High tech scanners can see through our clothes, and we have to submit to an x-ray vision strip search every time we board an airplane. Although we have laws that are intended to protect us against invasion of privacy, the laws are antiquated and in most cases were written before the computer age.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. March 10
    1776 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. MARcH 10, H. Owen and ofW. W. Welch-severally to the Committee on Wax braces some six or seven hundred miles of road under one control, Claims. and, talring it in connection with its control of the Georgia road, By Mr. A.. HERR SMITH: The petition of soldiers and sailors of more than that. That is all worked in connection with the expor­ the late war for an increase of pension to all pensioners who lost an tation of productions at Savannah. The Louisville and Nashville arm and leg while in the line of duty-to the Committee on Invalid system, which is very prominent and controls probably some two Pensions. thousand miles of road, or more, works in harmony with the Central. By Mr. STONE: The petition of Patrick McDonald, to be placed That combination of roads naturally looks to Savannah as an outlet on the retired list-to the Committee on Military Affairs. for a great deal of the produce that is shipped over its lines. There By Mr. TALBOTT: Papers relating to the claim of Alexander M. is then the line by way of'the Georgia and Cent.ral, through Atlanta Templeton-to the Committee on War Claims. over the Stat.e Road~ as it is called, by the Nashville, Chattanoo~a By Mr. URNER: Papers relating to the claim of Robertson Topp antl Saint Louis, al o connecting with the Louisville and Nashviue and William L. Vance-to the same committee. Road to the western cities. There are the same connections up to By Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State DREAM Act Application
    Step-by-Step User Guide to completing the New York State DREAM Act Application This user guide breaks down the New York State DREAM Act eligibility application and clarifies why certain questions are asked, how to answer each question accurately, and what documentation must be provided to verify your eligibility. Table of Contents Overview of Applications ........................................................................................................................... 3 The New York State DREAM Act Eligibility Requirements .............................................................. 3 NYS DREAM Act Application ................................................................................................................... 5 Student High School Education Details .............................................................................................. 5 High School Status ............................................................................................................................. 5 High School Completion .................................................................................................................... 7 Student Citizenship and Immigration Status ...................................................................................... 8 Social Security Number (SSN) or Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN): .............................. 10 Student Information .............................................................................................................................. 10 Student
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 497 16 October 2009 No. 125 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 16 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 551 16 OCTOBER 2009 552 Solicitor-General to make a statement about the Yvonne House of Commons Fletcher case? It emerged last night that, two years ago, a senior lawyer carried out an independent review of Friday 16 October 2009 the case for the Crown Prosecution Service in which he said that the two Libyans involved could be charged for conspiracy to cause death. Neither had diplomatic The House met at half-past Nine o’clock immunity; they escaped from the Libyan embassy. The report made it clear that both those men played an instrumental role in the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher. PRAYERS Last night, as I said, it emerged that the Crown Prosecution Service had confirmed that, two years on, The Second Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means took the police had still not provided it with the final case file the Chair as Deputy Speaker (Standing Order No. 3). containing the admissible evidence. Surely the Home Secretary should make a statement explaining why the NEW WRIT Metropolitan police are sitting on that vital evidence, Ordered, and to put our minds at rest by assuring us that Britain’s That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the trade interests are not being put before the interests of Crown, to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to bringing criminals to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle, Literature, and Film from the Post-Gatekeeper Period
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Hispanic Studies Hispanic Studies 2013 Telling the Story of Mexican Migration: Chronicle, Literature, and Film from the Post-Gatekeeper Period Ruth Brown University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brown, Ruth, "Telling the Story of Mexican Migration: Chronicle, Literature, and Film from the Post- Gatekeeper Period" (2013). Theses and Dissertations--Hispanic Studies. 11. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/hisp_etds/11 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Hispanic Studies at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Hispanic Studies by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless a preapproved embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • What DACA Recipients Stand to Lose— and What States Can Do About It by Silva Mathema September 13, 2018
    What DACA Recipients Stand to Lose— and What States Can Do About It By Silva Mathema September 13, 2018 In the six years since the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program went into effect, its recipients, many of whom came to the United States as children, have lived through a roller coaster of policy shifts.1 Beginning with its implementation in 2012, DACA has provided eligible young people a temporary reprieve from depor- tation and has removed barriers to pursue opportunities and earn a living. Although it does not provide a permanent solution, DACA has given more than 800,0002 young people access to basic freedoms, including work permits, driver’s licenses, affordable higher education, and, in certain states, professional licenses. Above all, DACA has relieved many individuals of the constant fear of being deported from the country they call home.3 Thousands of stories have emerged that depict how DACA has significantly changed recipients’ lives for the better. One such story from FWD.us details how DACA has allowed Chris to support his family in New York: He is “working, paying the bills, keeping the lights on … making sure everyone gets fed, that [his] family has a place to live.”4 Yet DACA recipients are currently living in limbo. After the Trump administration announced an end to DACA in September 2017 and started a clock on its phase- out, judges in three U.S. district courts—California, New York, and the District of Columbia—ordered the federal government to continue receiving and adjudicating DACA renewal applications, even as it would no longer consider new applications.5 In a separate lawsuit, Texas, along with seven other states, and two Republican governors from Mississippi and Maine challenged DACA, seeking to end the program.6 While Judge Andrew S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Undocumented Closet, 92 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 92 | Number 1 Article 2 12-1-2013 The ndoU cumented Closet Rose Cuison Villazor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rose C. Villazor, The Undocumented Closet, 92 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol92/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNDOCUMENTED CLOSET* ROSE CUISON VILLAZOR The phrase "coming out of the closet" traditionally refers to moments when lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer ("LGBTQ") individuals decide to reveal their sexual orientation or gender identity to their families, friends, and communities. In the last few years, many immigrants,particularly those who were brought to the United States illegally when they were very young, have invoked the narrative of "coming out." Specifically, they have publicly "outed" themselves by disclosing their unauthorized immigrationstatus despite the threat of deportation laws. In so doing, they have revealed their own closet-"the undocumented closet"-in which they have been forced to hide their identity as "undocumented Americans." Notably, by choosing to become visible, these undocumented Americans are slowly yet powerfully reforming immigration policy by demanding that they are recognized as lawful members of the American polity. This Article explores the roles that the closet metaphor and the act of coming out play in the immigration justice movement.
    [Show full text]
  • US Immigration
    BUSHELL (DO NOT DELETE) 5/29/2013 2:45 PM “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses”—Just as Long as They Fit the Heteronormative Ideal: U.S. Immigration Law’s Exclusionary & Inequitable Treatment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Queer Migrants Logan Bushell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 674 II. IMMIGRATION & SEXUALITY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATING SEXUALITY AT THE BORDER .......................................... 677 A. 1875-1917: Establishing a Foundational Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants .................................................... 678 B. 1917-1990: Adherence to the Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants ......................................................................... 680 III. REFUGE IN THE COURTHOUSE? THE JUDICIARY’S APPROACH TO EXCLUSIONARY IMMIGRATION LAWS & POLICIES .............................. 683 A. Boutilier v. INS: Not Welcome—The Judiciary’s Sanctioning of Exclusionary Immigration Laws & Policies ............................ 683 B. Hill v. INS: An Inclusionary Olive Branch from the Judiciary ... 685 IV. TWO STEPS FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: PROGRESSIVE MEASURES PROVE MERELY PRETEXTUAL ........................................... 687 A. No Longer Categorically Excluded, but Certainly Not Included: Dismissing LGBTQ Persons from Family Unification ................................................................................... 687 B. Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding Exactly Who
    [Show full text]