Joel Andreas Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles April 1999 Draft. Comments are welcome:
[email protected] 18,542 words Political and Cultural Capital as Axes of Contention in Student Factional Conflict during the Chinese Cultural Revolution1 ABSTRACT This paper proposes a new model to explain student factional conflict during the Chinese Cultural Revolution (1966-68). The Cultural Revolution opened up possibilities to attack political and intellectual elites and undermined the legitimacy of their principal resources – political and cultural capital. I discuss four different types of political factions each shaped in part by variations in the volume and composition of political and cultural capital. By helping explain the social bases of conflict during this unique event, a factional confrontation involving millions of people at the height of Communist power, this paper contributes to understanding the conflicts immanent in the reordered class structures of socialist societies. 1 I am grateful to Tang Shaojie, Song Yongyi, Michael Schoenhals, Richard Siao and Wang Youqin for the invaluable documents, introductions and perspectives they provided. Many people made helpful comments on drafts of this paper including Andrew Walder, Ivan Szelenyi, Michael Mann, Rebecca Emigh, Gi-wook Shin, Elizabeth Perry, Philip Huang, Suzanne Pepper, Yin Hongbiao, Han Dongping and participants in the Comparative Social Analysis Workshop and the China Dissertation Group at UCLA. Please direct comments to Joel Andreas:
[email protected]. INTRODUCTION What happens to class structure when its principal foundation – private property – is eliminated? Such was the radical social experiment carried out by communist parties after they came to power in Russia, China and other countries.