DOCSLIB.ORG

High Greater Glider Density at Coast Range/ Hepburns Road a Report to Forest Compliance DELWP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

High Greater Glider Density at Coast Range/ Hepburns Road A report to Forest Compliance DELWP Author: Rena Gaborov ([email protected]) Surveyors: Rena Gaborov, Owen Hanson, Andy Caller Abstract On the 8/12/2015 a spotlight count for Greater Gliders Petauroidies volans was carried out on Coast Range road adjacent to VicForests logging coupe 894-507-0003. The spotlighting survey recorded a count of 13 Greater Gliders. The animals were sited within 1300m of the transect. Within 1km of the transect 12 Greater Gliders were sited. Introduction The Greater Glider was once considered common but has now declined in a large part of its range (Lindenmayer et al., 2011; Woinarski et al., 2006; Maloney, 2007; Kavanagh and Webb 1998). The loss of large hollow bearing trees and a reduction in preferred feed trees from; inappropriate logging, wild fire and possibly increased predation is believed to be the cause of the decline. In Victoria the Greater Glider is not listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 but is listed as vulnerable on the Government’s Scientific Advisory List 2013. There is currently a nomination being reviewed to list the Greater Glider as ‘vulnerable’ under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1998. The current management regime for the protection of Greater Gliders in Victoria is; ‘Establish a SPZ of approximately 100 ha of suitable habitat where verified records report more than 2 individuals per hectare, more than 10 individuals per km or more than 15 individuals per hour of spotlighting, or where substantial populations are located in isolated or unusual habitat.’ DEPI, 2014 This report details a spotlight survey by the Goongerah Environment Centre (GECO) at Coast Range Road on the Errinundra Plateau that found 13 Greater Gliders within 1300 metres. Methods On the 8/12/2015 two teams spotlighted along the road an area of 1500 metres from Coast Range Road to Hepburns Road (Figure 1, Table 1). One team started on Hepburns Track (Hepburns team) and the other started on Coast Range Road (Coast Range team). The spotlight finished when the teams met which was approximately the middle (Figure 1). The Coast Range team was led by Owen Hanson and started at 22:29 and the Hepburn team was led by Rena Gaborov started at 22:57. They ended at 00:03am. Records were made of each animal, the coordinate in GDA 94, and the number of individuals. For Greater Gliders the approximate distance and compass bearing of each animal spotlighted was also recorded. A Led Lensor H14 head torch of at least 200 lumens was used by the Hepburn team with 10 X 42 Nikon binoculars. The Coast Range team used a 50 Watt hand held halogen spotlight and binoculars. There was no rain while spotlighting occurred despite a downfall prior. Wind however was apparent with branches moving. The night was overcast but clearing. Table 1. Start and End points of transect Coordinate in GDA Start and End Points 94 Start Coast Range Team 55 H 682075 5878526 Start Hepburn Team 55 H 682699 5878495 End Point 55 H 682505 5878064 Figure 1 Aerial image of transect showing the two start points and the end as well as the area scheduled for logging Results Combining results from both teams 13 Greater Gliders were seen on the spotlight this consisted of 8 from the Hepburns team and 5 from the Coast Range Team. Although the total transect was 1500 meters the area from the two furthest greater gliders was 1300metres. Within 1000m of the 1500m transect 12 Greater Gliders were seen. This is a high density of Greater Gliders, requiring a 100 hectare SPZ. The Greater Glider was the species with the highest number of individuals spotlighted. The only other species recorded by the Hepburn team was Mountain Brushtail Possums Trichosurus caninus with a count of 3, they also had 2 unidentified animals. The Coast Range team recorded five Greater Gliders, 1 Common Ringtail Possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus and 2 MountainBtushtail Possums. Refer to Table 2 for locations of all animals and Figure 2 for location of all animals and their position in relation to scheduled logging coupes and already proposed SPZ. Table 2. Species and their locations Number of ~ distance from Species individuals Coordinate in GDA94 Bearing coordinate (m) Greater Glider 2 55 H 682159 5878312 250 5 CRT 1 55 H 682209 5878203 230 20 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682210 5878192 250 20 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682381 5878071 200 5 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682389 5878055 230 20 MBP 1 55 H 682408 5878043 190 10 MBP 1 55 H 682444 5878064 345 10 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682692 5878395 190 20 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682825 5878266 20 20 MBP 1 55 H 682835 5878241 - - Greater Glider 1 55 H 682842 5878214 110 30 MBP 1 55 H 682838 5878173 - - Greater Glider 2 55 H 682588 5878045 10 40 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682562 5878055 360 45 Greater Glider 1 55 H 682501 5878063 170 10 MBP 1 55 H 682501 5878063 - - Greater Glider 1 55 H 682505 5878064 10 65 MBP = Mountain Brushtail Possum, CRT = Common Ring Tail Possum Figure 2(a) – Map by Andrew Lincoln Figure 2(b) – Map by Andrew Lincoln Figure 2 (c) – Map by Andrew Lincoln Discussion: The spotlight transect shows a density which warrants protection under the Planning Standards, 2014. The area on the north side of Coast Range Road is scheduled for logging and there is much evidence to show that logging will negatively affect the density of greater gliders (Kavanagh, 2000; Tyndale-Biscoe and Smith, 1969). The imminent threat of logging high density Greater Glider habitat means an SPZ will need to be put in place promptly which will ensure the habitat for the greater Glider is not destroyed in logging operations. Considering the EPBC (1998) review on the current conservation status of the Greater Glider, the current management standards are quite possibly minimal. References: Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2014. Planning standards for timber harvesting operations in Victoria’s State forests, 2014. Appendix 5 to the Management Standards and Procedures for timber harvesting operations in Victoria’s State forests 2014. Prepared by Land Management Policy Division for the Minister for Environment and Climate Change Kananagh, R and Webb, G. 1998. ‘Effects of variable-intensity logging on mammals, reptiles and amphibians at Waratah Creek, southeastern New South Wales’ Pacific Conservation Biology 4: 326-47. Kavanagh, R. 2000 . ‘Effects of variable-intensity logging and the influence of habitat variables on the distribution of the Greater Glider Petauroides volans in montane forest, southeastern New South Wales’ Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 18-30. Lindenmayer, D., Wood, J., McBurney, L., MacGregor, C. Youngentob, K. and Banks, S. 2011. ‘How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency’ Biological Conservation 144:663–1672 Malhoney, K. 2007. The Status of the Greater Glider “Petauroides volans” in the Illawarra Region. University of Wollngong Thesis Collection, Research Online. Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H., and Smith, R. F. C. (1969a). Studies on the marsupial glider Schoinobates volans (Kerr). III. Response to habitat destruction. Journal of Animal Ecology 38:651-659. Woinarski, J, McCosker, J, Gordon, G., Lawrie, B., James, C., Augusteyn, J., Slater, L., and Danvers, T. 2006. ‘Monitoring change in the vertebrate fauna of central Queensland, Australia, over a period of broad-scale vegetation clearance, 1975-2002’. Wildlife Research, 33:263-274. Appendix 1: Photos of Greater Gliders taken on the transect by Andy Caller .
Recommended publications
  • Husbandry Guidelines for Common Ringtail Possums, Pseudocheirus Peregrinus Mammalia: Pseudocheiridae

    Husbandry Guidelines for Common Ringtail Possums, Pseudocheirus Peregrinus Mammalia: Pseudocheiridae

    32325/01 Casey Poolman E0190918 Husbandry guidelines for Common Ringtail Possums, Pseudocheirus peregrinus Mammalia: Pseudocheiridae Ault Ringtail Possum Image: Casey Poolman Author: Casey Poolman Date of preparation: 7/11/2017 Open Colleges, Course name and number: ACM30310 Certificate III in Captive Animals Trainer: Chris Hosking Husbandry guidelines for Pseudocheirus peregrinus 1 32325/01 Casey Poolman E0190918 Author contact details [email protected] Disclaimer Please note that these husbandry guidelines are student material, created as part of student assessment for Open Colleges ACM30310 Certificate III in Captive Animals. While care has been taken by students to compile accurate and complete material at the time of creation, all information contained should be interpreted with care. No responsibility is assumed for any loss or damage resulting from using these guidelines. Husbandry guidelines are evolving documents that need to be updated regularly as more information becomes available and industry knowledge about animal welfare and care is extended. Husbandry guidelines for Pseudocheirus peregrinus 2 32325/01 Casey Poolman E0190918 Workplace Health and Safety risks warning Ringtail Possums are not an aggressive possum and will mostly try to freeze or hide when handled, however they can and do bite, which can be deep and penetrating. When handling possums always be careful not to get bitten, do not put your hands around its mouth. You should always use two hands and be firm but gentle. Adult Ringtail Possums should be gripped by the back of the neck and around the shoulders with one hand and around the base of the tail with the other. This should allow you to control the animal without hurting it and reduces the risk of you being bitten or scratched.
  • Platypus Collins, L.R

    Platypus Collins, L.R

    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
  • Biparental Care and Obligate Monogamy in the Rock-Haunting Possum, Petropseudes Dahli, from Tropical Australia

    Biparental Care and Obligate Monogamy in the Rock-Haunting Possum, Petropseudes Dahli, from Tropical Australia

    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59, 1001–1008 doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1392, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Biparental care and obligate monogamy in the rock-haunting possum, Petropseudes dahli, from tropical Australia MYFANWY J. RUNCIE CRC for Sustainable Development of Tropical Savannas, Northern Territory University (Received 10 May 1999; initial acceptance 9 June 1999; final acceptance 30 December 1999; MS. number: 6222R) Monogamy is rare among mammals, including marsupials. I studied the social organization of the little-known rock-haunting possum in Kakadu National Park in Northern Australia. Preliminary field observations revealed that the majority of possums live in cohesive groups consisting of a female–male pair and young, suggesting a monogamous mating system. I used radiotracking to determine home range patterns, and observations to measure the degree of symmetry between the sexes in maintaining the pair bond and initiating changes in group activity. I also measured the extent of maternal and paternal indirect and direct care. Nocturnal observations and radiotelemetric data from 3 years showed that six possum groups maintained nonoverlapping home ranges with long-term consorts and young sharing dens. Males contributed more than females to maintaining the pair bond but they contributed equally to parental care. For the first time, the parental behaviours of bridge formation, embracing, marshalling of young, sentinel behaviour and tail beating are reported in a marsupial. Males participated to a high degree in maintaining relationships with one mate and their offspring. Collectively, these results suggest that the mating system of this wild population of rock-haunting possums is obligate social monogamy.
  • The Western Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus Occidentalis)

    The Western Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus Occidentalis)

    A major road and an artificial waterway are barriers to the rapidly declining western ringtail possum, Pseudocheirus occidentalis Kaori Yokochi BSc. (Hons.) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Animal Biology Faculty of Science October 2015 Abstract Roads are known to pose negative impacts on wildlife by causing direct mortality, habitat destruction and habitat fragmentation. Other kinds of artificial linear structures, such as railways, powerline corridors and artificial waterways, have the potential to cause similar negative impacts. However, their impacts have been rarely studied, especially on arboreal species even though these animals are thought to be highly vulnerable to the effects of habitat fragmentation due to their fidelity to canopies. In this thesis, I studied the effects of a major road and an artificial waterway on movements and genetics of an endangered arboreal species, the western ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus occidentalis). Despite their endangered status and recent dramatic decline, not a lot is known about this species mainly because of the difficulties in capturing them. Using a specially designed dart gun, I captured and radio tracked possums over three consecutive years to study their movement and survival along Caves Road and an artificial waterway near Busselton, Western Australia. I studied the home ranges, dispersal pattern, genetic diversity and survival, and performed population viability analyses on a population with one of the highest known densities of P. occidentalis. I also carried out simulations to investigate the consequences of removing the main causes of mortality in radio collared adults, fox predation and road mortality, in order to identify effective management options.
  • Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd

    Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd

    Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue.
  • Husbandry Guidelines for Feathertail Gliders

    Husbandry Guidelines for Feathertail Gliders

    Husbandry Guidelines for (Photo: Luke Hogan, 1996) Feathertail Gliders Acrobates frontalis & Acrobates pygmaeus (Mammalia: Acrobatidae) Date By From Version 2012 Tom Patterson WSI Richmond v 1 Husbandry Manual for the Feathertail Glider DISCLAIMER These husbandry guidelines were produced by the compiler/author at TAFE NSW Western Sydney Institute, Richmond College, N.S.W. Australia as part assessment for completion of Certificate III in Captive Animals, Course number 18913. Since the husbandry guidelines are the result of student project work, care should be taken in the interpretation of information therein. In effect, all care taken but no responsibility is assumed for any loss or damage that may result from the use of these guidelines. Care has been taken to acknowledge the correct ownership of work. Should It is offered to the ASZK Husbandry Manuals Register for the benefit of animal welfare and care. Husbandry guidelines are utility documents and are ‘works in progress’, so enhancements to these guidelines are invited. 2 Annual Cycle of Maintenance Breeding Torpor Exhibit Change Replace Scrub Replace Soil Decrease Pest Collect Scrub Leaf nesting Nest (if applicable) food Control Faecal (1) (2) Litter materials Boxes (Torpor) Samples January February March April May June July August September October November December Note: (1) Northern populations – most likely all Acrobates frontalis, (2) Southern populations – most likely all Acrobates pygmaeus. All maintenance cycle should be used as a guide only. These tasks are noted at a minimum, but should be done as required. Record keeping, weights, observations and environmental enrichment should occur all year round OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS OH&S hazards can include anything that may be seen as a potential risk to you as a keeper or a member of the public.
  • Greater Glider Management Plan: South Gippsland. Draft

    Greater Glider Management Plan: South Gippsland. Draft

    1 Greater Glider Management Plan: South Gippsland. Draft Greater Glider, Mirboo Regional Park (HVP). Powerful Owls, Mirboo Regional Park (Dickies Hill). 2 INDEX 1. Aim……………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………. 2. Biology………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….. 3. Current Distribution South Gippsland…………………………………………………………….. P.2 4. Greater Glider Populations…………………………………………………....……………………... P.2 4.1. Mirboo Regional Park & Dickies Hill……………………………..…………………………..…. P.2 4.2. Hallston…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. P.3 4.3. Gunyah rainforest Reserve……………………………………………................................ P.3 5. Threats……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. P.3 5.1. Habitat Connectivity…………………………………………………..……………………………..… P.4 5.2. Habitat Destruction…………………………………………………………………………………..... P.5 5.3. Predators…………………………………………………………….………………………………….…... P.5 5.4. Climate Change………………………………………………………………………………………….... P.5 5.5. Firewood Collection………………………………………………………………………………….….. P.5 5.6. Timber Production…………………………………………………………………………………..…... P.6 5.7. Other Threats………………………………………………………………….……………………….….. P.6 P.6 6. Management Actions…………………………………………………………………………. P.6 5.1 Current and Future Habitat Restoration …………………………………………………………….… P.7 Hallston……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P.8 Mirboo RP…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. P.8 5.2 Genetic diversity……………………………………………………………………………………………….... P.10 5.3 Predation………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….. P.13 5.4 Climate Change…………………………………………………………………………………………..………. P.14
  • Sugarloaf Pipeline Project Toolangi Habitat Linkage Monitoring Effectiveness of Glider Pole Linkages May 2017

    Sugarloaf Pipeline Project Toolangi Habitat Linkage Monitoring Effectiveness of Glider Pole Linkages May 2017

    Melbourne Water Corporation Sugarloaf Pipeline Project Toolangi Habitat Linkage Monitoring Effectiveness of Glider Pole Linkages May 2017 Acknowledgements The following individuals or groups have assisted in the preparation of this report. However, it is acknowledged that the contents and views expressed within this report are those of GHD Pty Ltd and do not necessarily reflect the views of the parties acknowledged below: The Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) for allowing access to records in the VBA database Melbourne Water Corporation staff including Andrea Burns, Paul Evans, Alex Sneskov, Anna Zsoldos, Mark Scida, Warren Tomlinson and Steve McGill for providing assistance, support and advice throughout the project GHD | Report for Melbourne Water Corporation - Sugarloaf Pipeline Project Toolangi Habitat Linkage Monitoring, 31/29843 | i Abbreviations DELWP Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (formerly DEPI) DEPI Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries (now DELWP) DSE Department of Sustainability and Environment (now DELWP) EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 EVC Ecological Vegetation Class EWP Elevated Work Platform FFG Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 GHD GHD Pty Ltd ROW Right of Way MW Melbourne Water Corporation Spp. More than one species TSF Toolangi State Forest ii | GHD | Report for Melbourne Water Corporation - Sugarloaf Pipeline Project Toolangi Habitat Linkage Monitoring, 31/29843 Table of contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................
  • Easy Reference Sheet Caring for Gliders

    Easy Reference Sheet Caring for Gliders

    Easy Reference Sheet Caring for Gliders Version: January 2021 There are six species of gliders in Australia, five of which can be found in South-east Queensland. Australian gliders range in size (head and body) from 6.5 - 8cm long (Feathertail Gliders) to 35 - 45cm (Greater Glider). All Australian gliders are nocturnal. Most species have a highly specialised diet, comprising some or all of the following: nectar, pollen, insects, the sap of certain eucalypts and the gum from acacias. However the Greater Glider has a diet similar to the koala, eating only the foliage of certain species of eucalypt. Do I need a Permit to care for gliders? Yes. You will need a REHABILITATION PERMIT to care for gliders. A Rehabilitation Permit can be obtained from a licensed wildlife care group such as Wildcare. Remember all Australian native wildlife is protected in Queensland. You cannot keep them without an appropriate Permit. Do I have to do any training to care for gliders? Yes. Gliders have highly specialised dietary and housing requirements. They often come into care due to loss of habitat, injury or as a result of being orphaned. You must have a good understanding of their biology, be able to recognise signs of illness and injury and be able to provide emergency care to them. In Wildcare, you will need to complete the following training workshops in order to care for gliders:- • Orientation – compulsory for all members • Rescue and First Aid for Wildlife (Basic) – compulsory for all members • Caring for Orphaned Mammals • Gliders Is caring for gliders difficult? Caring for gliders is generally undertaken by experienced possum carers.
  • Fauna Survey, Wingham Management Area, Port Macquarie Region

    Fauna Survey, Wingham Management Area, Port Macquarie Region

    This document has been scanned from hard-copy archives for research and study purposes. Please note not all information may be current. We have tried, in preparing this copy, to make the content accessible to the widest possible audience but in some cases we recognise that the automatic text recognition maybe inadequate and we apologise in advance for any inconvenience this may cause. FOREST RESOURCES SERIES NO. 19 FAUNA SURVEY, WINGHAM MANAGEMENT AREA, PORT MACQUARIE REGION PART 1. MAMMALS BY ALAN YORK \ \ FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES ----------------------------- FAUNA SURVEY, WINGHAM MANAGEMENT AREA, PORT MACQUARIE REGION PART 1. MAMMALS by ALAN YORK FOREST ECOLOGY SECTION WOOD TECHNOLOGY AND FOREST RESEARCH DIVISION FORESTRY COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES SYDNEY 1992 Forest Resources Series No. 19 March 1992 The Author: AIan York, BSc.(Hons.) PhD., Wildlife Ecologist, Forest Ecology Section, Wood Technology and Forest Research Division, Forestry Commission ofNew South Wales. Published by: Forestry Commission ofNew South Wales, Wood Technology and Forest Research Division, 27 Oratava Avenue, West Pennant Hills, 2125 P.O. Box lOO, Beecroft 2119 Australia. Copyright © 1992 by Forestry Commission ofNew South Wales ODC 156.2:149 (944) ISSN 1033-1220 ISBN 07305 5663 8 Fauna Survey, Wingham Management Area, -i- PortMacquarie Region Part 1. Mammals TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 1. The Wingham Management Area 1 (a) Location 1 (b) Physical environment 3 (c) Vegetation communities 3 (d) Fire 5 (e) Timber harvesting : 5 SURVEY METHODOLOGy 7 1. Overall Sampling Strategy 7 (a) General survey 7 (b) Plot-based survey 7 (i) Stratification 1:Jy Broad Forest Type : 8 (ii) Stratification by Altitude 8 (iii) Stratification 1:Jy Management History 8 (iv) Plot selection 9 (v) Special considerations 9 (vi) Plot establishment 10 (vii) Plot design...........................................................................................................
  • Cercartetus Lepidus (Diprotodontia: Burramyidae)

    Cercartetus Lepidus (Diprotodontia: Burramyidae)

    MAMMALIAN SPECIES 842:1–8 Cercartetus lepidus (Diprotodontia: Burramyidae) JAMIE M. HARRIS School of Environmental Science and Management, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia; [email protected] Abstract: Cercartetus lepidus (Thomas, 1888) is a burramyid commonly called the little pygmy-possum. It is 1 of 4 species in the genus Cercartetus, which together with Burramys parvus form the marsupial family Burramyidae. This Lilliputian possum has a disjunct distribution, occurring on mainland Australia, Kangaroo Island, and in Tasmania. Mallee and heath communities are occupied in Victoria and South Australia, but in Tasmania it is found mainly in dry and wet sclerophyll forests. It is known from at least 18 fossil sites and the distribution of these reveal a significant contraction in geographic range since the late Pleistocene. Currently, this species is not listed as threatened in any state jurisdictions in Australia, but monitoring is required in order to more accurately define its conservation status. DOI: 10.1644/842.1. Key words: Australia, burramyid, hibernator, little pygmy-possum, pygmy-possum, Tasmania, Victoria mallee Published 25 September 2009 by the American Society of Mammalogists Synonymy completed 2 April 2008 www.mammalogy.org Cercartetus lepidus (Thomas, 1888) Little Pygmy-possum Dromicia lepida Thomas, 1888:142. Type locality ‘‘Tasma- nia.’’ E[udromicia](Dromiciola) lepida: Matschie, 1916:260. Name combination. Eudromicia lepida Iredale and Troughton, 1934:23. Type locality ‘‘Tasmania.’’ Cercartetus lepidus: Wakefield, 1963:99. First use of current name combination. CONTEXT AND CONTENT. Order Diprotodontia, suborder Phalangiformes, superfamily Phalangeroidea, family Burra- myidae (Kirsch 1968). No subspecies for Cercartetus lepidus are currently recognized.
  • The Ecology of the Koomal

    The Ecology of the Koomal

    THE ECOLOGY OF THE KOOMAL (TRICHOSURUS VULPECULA HYPOLEUCUS) AND NGWAYIR (PSEUDOCHEIRUS OCCIDENTALIS) IN THE JARRAH FORESTS OF SOUTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA Adrian Francis Wayne A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies The Australian National University, Canberra To Julia Northin and all of my family, for their love and support The ecology of the koomal and ngwayir in the jarrah forest DECLARATION This thesis is my own work except where otherwise acknowledged (see Acknowledgements and Preface). Adrian Francis Wayne May 2005 i The ecology of the koomal and ngwayir in the jarrah forest ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my supervisory panel. I am most grateful to David Lindenmayer (Principal Supervisor), Neil Burrows, Mike Calver and Ric How for their guidance, support and comments on this thesis. Many thanks to Ann Cowling for her statistical advice and assistance with the analyses for three of the chapters (2, 3 and 7). I am most grateful to Simon Knapp for his collaboration and diligence with the logistic regression modelling in Chapter 6. I also thank Christine Donnelly for conducting many of the analyses in Chapters 2, 3 and 7. Joern Fischer taught me ‘R’ scripting and assisted with the analyses in the two life history chapters (4 and 5). I deeply value Joern Fischer and Ioan Fazey for all of their help in so many ways, including their assistance to improve my writing style, comments on earlier drafts, discussions, support, advice and their friendship. Ross Cunningham provided valued design advice in the early development phase of this research.