DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Palliative Care Into Primary Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Palliative Care Into Primary Care Integrating palliative care into primary care for patients with chronic, life-limiting conditions 2.0 CONTACT HOURS Integrating palliative care into primary care for patients with chronic, life-limiting conditions Abstract: As longevity increases, individuals with chronic, life-limiting conditions will live longer with disease burden and functional decline. Nurse practitioners can integrate symptom management, early decision-making, and supportive care into the primary care setting to improve quality of life and decrease economic and emotional impact at the end of life. By Ann Selena Cleary, DNS, RN, NP-C lthough life expectancy is increasing worldwide, living longer is not always syn- onymous with a greater number of healthy years, as increasing age and risk for A developing a chronic, life-limiting condition are related. Approximately 20 mil- lion older individuals in the United States have at least two or more chronic, life-limiting health conditions; the most common are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, high cholesterol, and heart disease.1 These conditions last more than 1 year, require ongoing medical care, and affect inde- pendence and activities of daily living.2 Increased ED and offi ce visits, hospitalizations, and home healthcare services are associated with increasing age and multiple chronic conditions. In 2010, more than half of Medicare expenditure went to hospitalizations for 15% of the Medicare population, a disproportionate amount.3 In essence, this population is likely to experience increasing symptoms and a decrease in quality of life for several years prior to death. The majority of older adults in the United States have health insurance under Medicare, which includes a hospice benefi t for the last 6 months of life. However, patients could live months to years with increasing symptoms and worsening quality of life prior to hospice eligibility. During this time, care goals should focus on symptom management, psychosocial support, and advance care planning. / iStock © Tashi-Delek Keywords: end-of-life care, life-limiting conditions, palliative care 42 The Nurse Practitioner • Vol. 41, No. 3 www.tnpj.com Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Integrating palliative care into primary care for patients with chronic, life-limiting conditions www.tnpj.com The Nurse Practitioner • March 2016 43 Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Integrating palliative care into primary care for patients with chronic, life-limiting conditions The purpose of this article is to increase knowledge, During an extensive review of palliative care literature, clarify misconceptions, and raise awareness among primary Van Mechelen and colleagues found that 30 years of pal- care nurse practitioners (NPs) who care for older adults liative care research had been conducted without a clear with chronic, life-limiting health conditions. Resources and defi nition of the palliative care patient.6 This lack of clarity strategies are outlined to assist the NP to identify when and may refl ect the fact that end-of-life care is still being es- how to integrate palliative care into primary care if hospice tablished. Professional organizations representing hospice care is not considered an option. and palliative care only emerged within the last 30 years, with palliative medicine a board-certifi ed subspecialty of ■ Case study medicine since 2006.7 Nursing certification and educa- Ms. C was an 80-year-old woman living with her son, grand- tion have also expanded and now include seven categories daughter, and one great-grandchild in an urban, three- for certification, including advanced practice registered bedroom apartment. Her medical diagnoses included: type nurses. Approximately 17,000 U.S. nurses have been certi- 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fi brillation, heart fi ed since 1999 when certifi cation was expanded to include failure (HF), coronary artery disease, oxygen-dependent both hospice and palliative care nurses; however, there is no chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), osteoar- breakdown of certifi ed NPs or registered nurses.8 thritis, peripheral neuropathy, kidney dysfunction, diabetic Patient and provider communication barriers have been retinopathy, depression, and a chronic venous stasis ulcer on identifi ed; however, nuances (such as connotations attached a lower extremity. to terms) are also signifi cant.9 The choice of one term over During the last 8 months of her life, Ms. C experienced another can alter patient communication signifi cantly, as one several exacerbations of COPD (requiring hospitalization) study found when clinicians used or avoided using a term such and was intubated for an exacerbation of HF during the as “palliative” depending on the message they wanted to com- third hospitalization. The patient received care for the ve- municate. For example, cardiologists who wanted to initiate nous stasis ulcer at a wound-care center and also received an end-of-life discussion with patients diagnosed with HF home care services from a long-term care program that suggested referral to a “palliative medicine specialist” to com- provided a home healthcare aide and an RN who visited municate a poor prognosis to the patient. This often occurred Ms. C monthly and as needed. without any further explanation about overall condition or Her treatment regimen included subcutaneous insulin, why they recommended the referral. Conversely, palliative metered-dose inhalers for COPD, and approximately 10 care specialists initially avoided using their title or the word oral medications daily. Ms. C walked slowly with a walker, “palliative,” preferring to describe their role and how they could needed assistance with all activities of daily living, and in help the patient, thereby avoiding what they believed to be the last 3 months of her life, left her bedroom only to use negative connotations the patient may have about their role.10 the bathroom or attend medical appointments. Several days after discharge from the third rehospitalization while ■ Hospice care traveling to a follow-up cardiology appointment, she suf- In contrast, hospice care is less likely to be misunderstood. fered sudden cardiac arrest and died. Ms. C had completed Hospice services in the United States, as provided to Medi- a healthcare proxy but had no other advance directive at care recipients under the Medicare Hospice Benefi t, have the time of her death. changed little since the 1980s. Enrollment requires referral from the primary care provider (PCP) and certifi cation that ■ End-of-life terms and models of care the patient has 6 months or less to live. The patient exchanges Although many aspects of this case study may be familiar one benefi t for another, thereby waiving regular Medicare to NPs, the transition taking place in end-of-life care over benefi ts for hospice benefi ts, which results in all care being the last 2 decades may be unfamiliar, as new models of care coordinated and provided by the hospice.11 In 2014, a new have emerged.4,5 In addition, terms used in end-of-life care model (the Medicare Care Choices Model) was introduced are still not universally understood, creating confusion to allow patients with advanced cancer, COPD, HF, or HIV/ among healthcare providers (HCPs) and the public. The AIDS to receive both palliative and curative services. It should terms “hospice,” “terminal care,” “palliative care,” and “end- be noted that NPs are not authorized to order hospice care, of-life care” have been and continue to be used interchange- although they may recertify such care after it has been or- ably—both in clinical practice and the literature. These dered by a physician.12 terms describe care for patients diagnosed with serious, The term “palliative care” has evolved considerably over life-limiting, and nonlife-limiting (but chronic) conditions; the last several decades. Until the 1990s, it was frequently used however, these are not interchangeable terms.4-6 interchangeably with the term “hospice” and mostly to describe 44 The Nurse Practitioner • Vol. 41, No. 3 www.tnpj.com Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Integrating palliative care into primary care for patients with chronic, life-limiting conditions the dying cancer patient. During this time, a conceptual change led to a more philosophical approach to patient care with any Quality of life and symptom burden at diagnosis condition that could not be cured, although the patient was not imminently dying. This led to the establishment of specialized High level palliative care programs in hospitals and the community; how- Quality of life at diagnosis ever, unlike hospice care, there is no reimbursement provision, so these programs are reimbursed as other medical services.4 The recent Medicare Care Choices Model allows primary care Palliative and service reimbursement under Medicare (with the hospice por- Primary care Hospice care primary care tion reimbursed by a fl at monthly fee).5 The shift in using the term “palliative care” can also be traced to changes in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) defi nition, which initially only applied to patients with cancer. The most recent defi nition includes other life- Symptoms at diagnosis limiting conditions and associated symptoms—not only Low level pain—but all dimensions of the patient’s life, including family Time or other caregivers.13,14 Despite differences from one defi nition This abstract representation may assist NPs in identify- to another, the commonality is integrating palliative care into ing where a patient is in the disease course so as to proactively plan care decisions. As symptoms progress, usual active treatment rather than following treatment that palliative care becomes a greater focus. fails or as a replacement.4 Furthermore, the fi nal point in the WHO defi nition (that of concurrent, active treatment and Source: The fi gure was developed by Ann Selena Cleary, DNS, RN, NP-C. palliative care) has been demonstrated to improve quality of life and life expectancy in patients with lung cancer.15 tween symptoms and quality of life, care will transition over time (see Quality of life and symptom burden at diagnosis).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Patient Care Through Telepharmacy September 2016
    Patient Care through Telepharmacy September 2016 Gregory Janes Objectives 1. Describe why telepharmacy started and how it has evolved with technology 2. Explain how telepharmacy is being used to provide better patient care, especially in rural areas 3. Understand the current regulatory environment around the US and what states are doing with regulation Agenda ● Origins of Telepharmacy ● Why now? ● Telepharmacy process ● Regulatory environment ● Future Applications Telepharmacy Prescription verification CounselingPrescription & verification Education History Origins of Telepharmacy 1942 Australia’s Royal Flying Doctor Service 2001 U.S. has first state pass telepharmacy regulation 2003 Canada begins first telepharmacy service 2010 Hong Kong sees first videoconferencing consulting services US Telepharmacy Timeline 2001 North Dakota first state to allow 2001 Community Health Association in Spokane, WA launches program 2002 NDSU study begins 2003 Alaska Native Medical Center program 2006 U.S. Navy begins telepharmacy 2012 New generation begins in Iowa Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii NDSU Telepharmacy Study Study from 2002-2008 ● 81 pharmacies ○ 53 retail and 28 hospital ● Rate of dispensing errors <1% ○ Compared to national average of ~2% ● Positive outcomes, mechanisms could be improved Source: The North Dakota Experience: Achieving High-Performance
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Health Care
    PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE DANA BARTLETT, BSN, MSN, MA, CSPI Dana Bartlett is a professional nurse and author. His clinical experience includes 16 years of ICU and ER experience and over 20 years of as a poison control center information specialist. Dana has published numerous CE and journal articles, written NCLEX material, written textbook chapters, and done editing and reviewing for publishers such as Elsevire, Lippincott, and Thieme. He has written widely on the subject of toxicology and was recently named a contributing editor, toxicology section, for Critical Care Nurse journal. He is currently employed at the Connecticut Poison Control Center and is actively involved in lecturing and mentoring nurses, emergency medical residents and pharmacy students. ABSTRACT Screening is an effective method for detecting and preventing acute and chronic diseases. In the United States healthcare tends to be provided after someone has become unwell and medical attention is sought. Poor health habits play a large part in the pathogenesis and progression of many common, chronic diseases. Conversely, healthy habits are very effective at preventing many diseases. The common causes of chronic disease and prevention are discussed with a primary focus on the role of health professionals to provide preventive healthcare and to educate patients to recognize risk factors and to avoid a chronic disease. nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com 1 Policy Statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of NurseCe4Less.com and the continuing nursing education requirements of the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation for registered nurses. It is the policy of NurseCe4Less.com to ensure objectivity, transparency, and best practice in clinical education for all continuing nursing education (CNE) activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Primary Care Health Care Workforce Gap Analysis
    Oklahoma Primary Care Health Care Workforce Gap Analysis DRAFT Prepared by OSU Center for Rural Health OSU Center for Health Sciences Tulsa, Oklahoma June 2015 Table of Contents Table of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables........................................................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Background & Data Acquisition ...................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Primary Care Provider Supply ......................................................................................................................... 3 Primary Care Provider Demand ................................................................................................................... 10 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Limitations ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Network Listing | Healthpartners
    DHS-6594C-ENG HealthPartners® Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO) (HMO SNP) Network April 2018 – September 2018 PRIMARY CARE NETWORK LISTING Minnesota Counties: Anoka, Benton, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, Stearns, Washington, Wright HealthPartners 8170 33rd Ave S. P.O. Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 Member Services: 952-967-7029 or 1-888-820-4285 (TTY/TDD 711) Oct. 1 – Feb. 14 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. CT, seven days a week Feb. 15 – Sept. 30 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. CT, Monday – Friday healthpartners.com/msho HealthPartners is a health plan that contracts with both Medicare and the Minnesota Medical Assistance (Medicaid) program to provide benefits of both programs to enrollees. Enrollment in HealthPartners depends on contract renewal. HealthPartners MSHO Plan 16697_Print April 2018 H2422 108677 DHS Approved 1/25/2018 1-888-820-4285 Attention. If you need free help interpreting this document, call the above number. ያስተውሉ፡ ካለምንም ክፍያ ይህንን ዶኩመንት የሚተረጉምሎ አስተርጓሚ ከፈለጉ ከላይ ወደተጻፈው የስልክ ቁጥር ይደውሉ። مﻻحظة: إذا أردت مساعدة مجانية لترجمة هذه الوثيقة، اتصل على الرقم أعﻻه. သတိ။ ဤစာရြက္စာတမ္းအားအခမဲ့ဘာသာျပန္ေပးျခင္း အကူအညီလုုိအပ္ပါက၊ အထက္ပါဖုုန္းနံပါတ္ကုုိေခၚဆုုိပါ။ kMNt’sMKal’ . ebIG~k¨tUvkarCMnYyk~¬gkarbkE¨bäksarenHeday²tKit«f sUmehATUrs&BÍtamelxxagelI . 請注意，如果您需要免費協助傳譯這份文件，請撥打上面的電話號碼。 Attention. Si vous avez besoin d’une aide gratuite pour interpréter le présent document, veuillez appeler au numéro ci-dessus. Thov ua twb zoo nyeem. Yog hais tias koj xav tau kev pab txhais lus rau tsab ntaub ntawv no pub dawb, ces hu rau tus najnpawb xov tooj saum toj no.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW June 2016
    PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW June 2016 Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. TABLE OF CONTENTS I PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW II APPENDIX: SELECT MARKET PARTICIPANTS PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW The delivery and coordination of primary care is taking on renewed and increasing importance as the system’s gatekeeper in the evolving U.S. healthcare landscape. Primary care accounts for nearly $250 billion of annual industry revenue and over 55% of total office-based physician visits1,2 . However, the systematic under-investment of this integral component of the healthcare system has created a number of well publicized challenges, including: • Insufficient supply of new primary care physicians from medical school • Lower compensation vis-à-vis other specialties • Demands of an aging population outstripping system resources • Under-supply of primary care to rural areas . As the initial contact point for patients, the primary care system will increasingly function as the gatekeeper for care coordination and patient referrals for public and private payors and for healthcare systems . Therefore primary care now fills a critical role in the transition from fee-for-service (“FFS”) to value-based care . To meet these challenges new, innovative primary care practice models have emerged to address care coordination, access and quality of care, and cost, including the following four models highlighted in this report: • Medicare Advantage/Managed Medicaid • Employer Sponsored Health Clinics • Retail Clinics • Concierge Clinics .
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Self-Management Support Programs: an Evaluation
    Final Contract Report ______________________________________________________________________________ Patient Self-Management Support Programs: An Evaluation Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 282-00-0005 Prepared by: RAND Health Santa Monica, CA Marjorie L. Pearson, PhD, MSHS Soeren Mattke, MD, DSc Rebecca Shaw, MA M. Susan Ridgely, JD Shelley H. Wiseman, BA AHRQ Publication No. 08-0011 November 2007 This report was prepared by RAND Health under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 282-00-0005). The views expressed in this report are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content. No statement in this report should be construed as an official endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission. AHRQ appreciates citation as to source. The suggested citation format is: Pearson ML, Mattke S, Shaw R, Ridgely MS, Wiseman SH. Patient Self-Management Support Programs: An Evaluation. Final Contract Report (Prepared by RAND Health under Contract No. 282-00-0005). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2007. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0011. ii Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge and thank the following individuals who participated in interviews for this report. We are grateful
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH and SELF-CARE: a Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-Care
    HEALTH AND SELF-CARE: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care Summer 2019 DrWayneJonas.com HEALTH AND SELF-CARE: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 3 A LETTER FROM DR . WAYNE JONAS . 5 NATIONAL SURVEY INFOGRAPHIC . 7 WHAT DO THE DATA TELL US ABOUT SELF-CARE? . 9 The Evidence Base for Self-Care .. 9 The Samueli Integrative Health Programs/Harris Poll Survey . 10 DEFINING SELF-CARE . 15 Types of Self-Care . 17 Correcting Patient Misconceptions About Self-Care . 18 HOW CAN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH LEAD TO MORE SELF-CARE? . 19 Self-Care’s Role in Integrative Health . 19 Self-Care and Shared Decision Making . 19 SURVEY METHODOLOGY . 20 REFERENCES . 21 Health and Self-Care: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix in ten adults in the U .S . have a chronic disease and four in ten adults have two or more, according Sto the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Conditions such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes are making more people sick every day and will continue to do so without behavior change and self-care. As rates of chronic disease continue to rise, self-care practices will become increasingly important to the nation’s health. This report – developed by Samueli Integrative Health Programs in concert with The Harris Poll – demonstrates the importance of self-care to patients’ health and well-being, explains how to implement self-care services in the healthcare care setting, and discusses the current trends in both doctors’ and patients’ self-care beliefs and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Health Professional in Supporting Self Care
    Quality in Primary Care 2006;14:129–31 # 2006 Radcliffe Publishing Guest editorial The role of the health professional in supporting self care Ruth Chambers DM FRCGP Professor of Primary Care, Faculty of Health and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, and Director of Postgraduate General Practice Education, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK It is widely believed that patients who adopt self care Safety concerns practices, will reduce demand on general practitioners (GPs) and other providers of healthcare as a whole.1 The evidence base that justifies self care is wide- Safety concerns tend not to feature in research reports ranging, but robust evidence of the cost-effectiveness or policies of those advocating or trialling patients’ self of increased self care by patients is awaited, in terms of care;2,5,6 yet there are potential adverse events for most better health outcomes for patients, more appropriate health conditions if medical care is not sought or consultations with the healthcare team, and savings on obtained appropriately.7–10 So, inappropriate self care providing healthcare.1,2 There may be displaced costs. could be costly for the individual person if they suffer For example, more appropriate consultation behav- harm from waiting too long before seeking medical iour by patients with doctors could lead to increased help, or pursue self care with an ineffectual or harmful consultation rates with other primary care professionals treatment. It could rebound on the NHS if the result of such as pharmacists, or with primary
    [Show full text]
  • How Primary Care Produces Better Outcomes: a Logic Model
    How Primary Care Produces Better Outcomes: A Logic Model James W. Mold, MD, MPH Department of Family and Preventive Medicine University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Roger I. Lienke, MD Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Brendan Drew, BS Boulder, Colorado Word Count: Key Words: Primary care, logic model, patient-centered medical home, outcomes, attributes 1 ABSTRACT Context: Greater access to primary care is associated with lower health care costs and better health outcomes. The reasons for this are not entirely clear. In an attempt to clarify the links between primary care and outcomes, we constructed a “logic model” based upon a systematic review of the literature and our clinical experience. Methods: We reviewed all publications from a search of the English language literature from 1966 to the present using the search term, “primary care,” plus potentially relevant references from their bibliographies. We then constructed lists of desired outcomes and intermediate outcomes and summarized the evidence supporting the links between them. The principal attributes of primary care were derived from the Institute of Medicine’s 1996 report.1 To identify and categorize the mechanisms leading from attributes to intermediate outcomes, we relied upon our own clinical experience, the published literature, and from others in the field. Findings: We identified 6 primary attributes (accessibility, coordination, sustained care, comprehensiveness, partnership, and person-centeredness) and two encompassing constructs (integration and accountability) that constitute primary care. Proposed causal links to the 8 desired outcomes pass through 14 mechanisms and 14 intermediate outcomes. Conclusions: We hope this model will stimulate further discussion among policy-makers, researchers, educators, and clinicians working to strengthen primary care, the most logical foundation of the health care system.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Medicare Preventive Services
    Your Guide to Medicare Preventive Services C E N T E R S F O R M E D I C A R E & M E D I C A I D S E R V I C E S This is the official government booklet with important information about: • What disease prevention is and why it’s important • Which preventive services Medicare covers and how often • Who can get services • What you pay – you pay nothing for many services YOUR GUIDE TO MEDICARE PREVENTIVE SERVICES ow’s the time to get the most out of your Medicare. The best way to stay Nhealthy is to live a healthy lifestyle. You can live a healthy lifestyle and prevent disease by exercising, eating well, keeping a healthy weight, and not smoking. Medicare can help. Medicare pays for many preventive services to keep you healthy. Preventive services can find health problems early, when treatment works best, and can keep you from getting certain diseases. Preventive services include exams, shots, lab tests, and screenings. They also include programs for health monitoring, and counseling and education to help you take care of your own health. If you have Medicare Part B (Medical Insurance), you can get a yearly “Wellness” visit and many other covered preventive services. Whether it’s online, in person, or on the phone, Medicare is committed to helping people get the information they need to make smart choices about their Medicare benefits. MyMedicare.gov Register at MyMedicare.gov to get direct access to your preventive health information—24 hours a day, every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix V – Interpretive Guidelines – Responsibilities of Medicare Participating Hospitals in Emergency Cases ______(Rev
    State Operations Manual Appendix V – Interpretive Guidelines – Responsibilities of Medicare Participating Hospitals in Emergency Cases _______________________________________________________________________ (Rev. 191, 07-19-19) Transmittals for Appendix V Part I- Investigative Procedures I. General Information II. Principal Focus of Investigation III. Task 1 - Entrance Conference IV. Task 2 - Case Selection Methodology V. Task 3- Record Review VI. Task 4- Interviews VII. Task 5-Exit Conference VIII. Task 6- Professional Medical Review IX. Task 7- Assessment of Compliance and Completion of the Deficiency Report X. Additional Survey Report Documentation ______________________________________________________________________ Part II - Interpretive Guidelines - Responsibilities of Medicare Participating Hospitals in Emergency Cases §489.20 Basic Section 1866 Commitments Relevant to Section 1867 Responsibilities §489.20(l) §489.20(m) §489.20(q) §489.20(r) §489.24(j) Availability of On-Call physicians §489.24 Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases §489.24(a) Applicability of Provisions of this Section §489.24(c) Use of Dedicated Emergency Department for Nonemergency Services §489.24(d) Necessary Stabilizing Treatment for Emergency Medical Conditions §489.24(e) Restricting Transfer Until the Individual Is Stabilized §489.24(f) Recipient Hospital Responsibilities ________________________________________________________________________ Part I- Investigative Procedures (Rev. 191, Issued: 07-19-19, Effective: 07-19-19,
    [Show full text]
  • KDHE Guidance for COVID-19 Non-Congregate Housing Updated May 28, 2021
    KDHE Guidance for COVID-19 Non-Congregate Housing Updated May 28, 2021 Introduction Isolation of COVID-19 positive persons and persons under investigation (PUIs) is necessitated as part of a community mitigation strategy with the current pandemic. Positive cases and PUIs are identified through testing and contact investigations. Recommendation about how to isolate is made by the health department and if is determined that a patient cannot effectively isolate in their current home, then alternative housing is offered. We recognize that these patients will have ongoing needs in addition to food, shelter, safety that includes management of their chronic medical conditions as well as monitoring of COVID-19 disease, specifically for resolution of symptoms and release from isolation, as well as watchfulness for deterioration that may require hospitalization. Isolation and quarantine guidance may differ for people who are fully vaccinated. See Isolation and Quarantine FAQ. https://www.coronavirus.kdheks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/134/Isolation--Quarantine- Guidance-and-FAQs-PDF---3-15-21. This document aims to outline a specific framework to accomplish this medical monitoring function. Staffing A clinician (Physician, APRN, RN) is tasked with maintaining contact with a cohort of patients in isolation housing. Ideally, the same clinicians, rotating call, would follow the same cohort for continuity, with additional clinicians added as more patients enter housing. A clinician will need sufficient knowledge to understand a wide variety of medical conditions and their management as well as skill in observation and medical assessment to identify worsening symptoms or deteriorating vital signs. There will be a designated on-call clinician available at all hours.
    [Show full text]