DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Strategies for Improving Primary Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five Strategies for Improving Primary Care Five strategies for improving primary care Easy access to high-quality primary care is a prerequisite for good public health. Five strategies can be used—alone or in combination—to improve the delivery of primary care. 69 Elisabeth Hansson Primary care is pivotal to any health system. agencies to ensure that their patients receive and Sorcha For most patients, primary care physicians appropriate support at home. McKenna, PhD are the health system’s “face”—the providers they see most often and the ones with whom they To understand how well primary care is develop long-term relationships. currently being delivered in Western Europe, we analyzed data from six countries: France, Most countries have found it hard to deliver Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and good primary care, though. Research we the United Kingdom. Some of these countries recently conducted in multiple European coun- rely principally on taxes to cover the cost of health tries uncovered similar problems in all of care; the other systems are insurance based. them. A growing number of patients, for example, Although the countries differ in their approach to are dissatisfied with their ability to get access primary care in several ways (Exhibit 1), some to primary care services. The productivity of general conclusions can be drawn. In insurance- many primary care physicians is declining, and based systems, most GPs are independent the quality of care delivered varies widely. practitioners who work in comparatively small clinics and are reimbursed (in whole or in There is a better way. Health systems and part) on a fee-for-service basis. Because market payors can use five strategies—alone or forces tend to be stronger in these countries, in combination—to improve their primary care they often have more GPs per capita than services: they can increase competition countries with tax-based funding do. In contrast, among primary care physicians, tighten their the GPs in tax-based systems are usually public contracting and reimbursement mechanisms, employees who work in larger clinics; capitation strengthen their performance-management plays a more significant role in the mixed funding systems, improve their operating models, models used to pay these physicians. and increase the integration of primary care with secondary care and social care. However, all of the countries face significant challenges in delivering primary care. Challenges to primary care delivery These challenges can be grouped into six In virtually all health systems, primary care interrelated categories: physicians—typically, general practitioners (GPs)—are the clinicians most patients see first Access: In many countries, patients are dissat- when they have a health problem, as well as the isfied with their ability to see GPs in a timely clinicians they see most often. Our studies have fashion. As a result, some patients present to the shown, for example, that 70 percent of all emergency room for treatment instead, driving interactions UK patients have with the health up overall health system costs. Other patients system are with GPs. These physicians handle delay seeking help or go without needed care, their patients’ ordinary health problems them- which often results in more complications and selves, and they coordinate with the rest of the higher costs (this is particularly likely to occur health system when advanced care is needed. In when the patients have chronic conditions, such some health systems, GPs also coordinate as diabetes). We have found that poor access to with social services and other community care care is a problem in most health systems, but it is 70 Health International 2009 Number 8 Health International 2009 Step change in primary care Exhibit 1 of 4 Glance: Tax-based and insurance-based health systems often take different approaches to primary care. Exhibit title: Different approaches Exhibit 1 Different approaches General practitioners Role of GPs Structure (GPs), per Market rules Models of care Financing 1,000 population Tax-based and insurance- Tax Sweden 0.6 Varies by region 80% public Mix of budget, fee for based health systems often 51% of clinics have based more than 5 doctors service, and capitation take different approaches to primary care. United 0.7 Gatekeeper 80% quasi- 2 doctors Capitation with Kingdom independent per clinic incentives Spain 0.7 Gatekeeper 90% public 4–6 doctors per Salary and capitation health care center per person Insurance Germany 1.0 No gatekeeper 100% 60% of clinics Fee for service based independent have 1 doctor France 0.9 Gatekeeper 70% 40% of clinics Fee for service independent have 1 doctor Netherlands 1.8 Gatekeeper 100% 83% of clinics Capitation fee independent have 1–2 doctors and payment per procedure Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Health Data 2008; Vektis; McKinsey analysis particularly acute in tax-based systems because of the baby boom generation moves into retirement. their lower number of GPs per capita. In Sweden, In Germany, for example, the average age for example, many patients report that they of physicians has risen substantially in the past cannot get timely access to their GP, especially by 15 years (Exhibit 2). As the older GPs retire, 1 1Väntetider i vården, telephone. Achieving the right level of access there is likely to be an insufficient number of vantetider.se. is a significant challenge for all health systems, replacements available. 2For insight into how easy access to care has driven up because costs can rise dramatically if patients find Japan’s health care costs, 2 see “Reforming Japan’s health it too easy to access care. Furthermore, easier Productivity: GP productivity (as measured by system,” p. 36. access to GPs does not necessarily result in a the number of patients seen by a physician 3D. S. Furmedge, “General practice stigma at medical lower number of specialist consultations, as some per week or the number of patients in a given GP’s school and beyond—do we need to take action?” British Journal Swedish payors have discovered. Nevertheless, practice) often varies markedly—not only of General Practice, 2008, long wait times for treatment frustrate patients between countries but also between regions Volume 58, Number 553, p. 581; B. Ali, M. Jones, “Do and make an otherwise good health system look in the same country, between different medical students want to as if it is performing poorly in the public’s eyes. GP offices, and even between individual doctors become GPs?” British Journal of General Practice, 2003, in the same office. In Spain, for example, Volume 53, Number 488, p. 241; E. D. Avgerinos et al., Workforce supply: Even countries with GP productivity is twice as high in Baleares as it is “Greek medical students’ insurance-based funding often have a shortage of in Castilla y León (Exhibit 3). The differences career choices indicate strong tendency towards GPs for a simple reason: many physicians in in productivity remain even after the analyses specialization and training abroad,” Health Policy, 2006, training do not view primary care as intellectually are adjusted for patient demographics Volume 79, pp. 101–6; and challenging or economically attractive. Surveys and other relevant factors, which suggests that B. Wright, “Career choice of new medical students at three in several countries have shown that fewer than significant opportunities to improve GP Canadian universities: family medicine versus specialty 20 percent of medical students are interested productivity exist. Taking advantage of those medicine,” Canadian Medical in becoming GPs.3 Furthermore, the shortage of opportunities is becoming increasingly important, Association Journal, 2004, Volume 170, pp. 1920–24. GPs is likely to get worse in coming years as because GP productivity is declining in some Five strategies for improving primary care 71 Health International 2009 Step change in primary care Exhibit 2 of 4 Glance: The number of physicians in Germany are aged 60 and older is increasing. Exhibit title: Aging physicians Exhibit 2 Aging physicians Comparison 1993 vs 2007 Average age The number of physicians 1993 = 47.5 2007 = 51.5 in Germany aged 60 and older 6,000 is increasing. Share of physicians 5,000 aged 60 and older: 1993: 8.8% 2007: 17.5% 4,000 2007 3,000 2,000 Number or physicians 1993 1,000 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Age Source: German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians; McKinsey analysis countries. The productivity of British GPs, for best quality metrics for primary care should example, has dropped sharply in the past be (for instance, which evidence-based practices 15 years despite the fact that the government has should be considered the standard of care). markedly increased what it pays them.4 (The And given that GPs are often widely dispersed United Kingdom is the exception to the general throughout their communities, it is often rule that primary care is financially unattrac- quite difficult for health systems and payors tive.) Whether GP productivity is higher in to determine what care has actually been insurance-based systems than in tax-based ones delivered. The United Kingdom has attempted is currently unclear, because insurance-based to improve the quality of its primary care systems do not typically measure GP productivity. services through a new program, the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), which gives Quality: A challenge that all countries face GPs additional payments if they meet specified is how to ensure that the quality of care outcome metrics (for instance, the percentage delivered by GPs is high; indeed, most health of hypertensive patients whose blood pressure is systems—and the payors within those systems— lowered to the normal range). The program acknowledge that this challenge is one of their has been successful in focusing attention and core concerns. Unfortunately, very little reliable improving scores on those metrics, but it 4NHS Information Centre, 2006–07 GP workload survey; information is available to enable them to gauge has become clear that a GP’s performance on NHS Information Centre, the relative quality of primary care services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Patient Care Through Telepharmacy September 2016
    Patient Care through Telepharmacy September 2016 Gregory Janes Objectives 1. Describe why telepharmacy started and how it has evolved with technology 2. Explain how telepharmacy is being used to provide better patient care, especially in rural areas 3. Understand the current regulatory environment around the US and what states are doing with regulation Agenda ● Origins of Telepharmacy ● Why now? ● Telepharmacy process ● Regulatory environment ● Future Applications Telepharmacy Prescription verification CounselingPrescription & verification Education History Origins of Telepharmacy 1942 Australia’s Royal Flying Doctor Service 2001 U.S. has first state pass telepharmacy regulation 2003 Canada begins first telepharmacy service 2010 Hong Kong sees first videoconferencing consulting services US Telepharmacy Timeline 2001 North Dakota first state to allow 2001 Community Health Association in Spokane, WA launches program 2002 NDSU study begins 2003 Alaska Native Medical Center program 2006 U.S. Navy begins telepharmacy 2012 New generation begins in Iowa Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii NDSU Telepharmacy Study Study from 2002-2008 ● 81 pharmacies ○ 53 retail and 28 hospital ● Rate of dispensing errors <1% ○ Compared to national average of ~2% ● Positive outcomes, mechanisms could be improved Source: The North Dakota Experience: Achieving High-Performance
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Health Care
    PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE DANA BARTLETT, BSN, MSN, MA, CSPI Dana Bartlett is a professional nurse and author. His clinical experience includes 16 years of ICU and ER experience and over 20 years of as a poison control center information specialist. Dana has published numerous CE and journal articles, written NCLEX material, written textbook chapters, and done editing and reviewing for publishers such as Elsevire, Lippincott, and Thieme. He has written widely on the subject of toxicology and was recently named a contributing editor, toxicology section, for Critical Care Nurse journal. He is currently employed at the Connecticut Poison Control Center and is actively involved in lecturing and mentoring nurses, emergency medical residents and pharmacy students. ABSTRACT Screening is an effective method for detecting and preventing acute and chronic diseases. In the United States healthcare tends to be provided after someone has become unwell and medical attention is sought. Poor health habits play a large part in the pathogenesis and progression of many common, chronic diseases. Conversely, healthy habits are very effective at preventing many diseases. The common causes of chronic disease and prevention are discussed with a primary focus on the role of health professionals to provide preventive healthcare and to educate patients to recognize risk factors and to avoid a chronic disease. nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com 1 Policy Statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of NurseCe4Less.com and the continuing nursing education requirements of the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation for registered nurses. It is the policy of NurseCe4Less.com to ensure objectivity, transparency, and best practice in clinical education for all continuing nursing education (CNE) activities.
    [Show full text]
  • General Practice Or Primary Health Care? J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.M
    - * ..t *;-gW -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..._wP..;!-t . .ik. General practice or primary health care? J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.M.........;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........j: .-: . J. M. ,uam-.u.,. 'sr. PRIMARY health care in the UK is undergoing a period of extensive review. The 1980s have seen the publication of the green' and white papers,2 the CbeitR. *- icor - -m- --- Cumberlege review of community nursing3 and the Griffiths report on community care.4 Over the same period, the scope of primary medical care has widened, and with the setting up of independent family practitioner committees in 1985, a management framework for family practitioner services is now being created. These recent reports have reflected, rather than resolved, three major tensions in .............. primary care: between individual and population-based approaches, between employed staff and independent contractors and between broad and narrow I ~~~~~i5oms~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mcw~~~~~W-Ff.mw -W definitions of primary health care. These tensions are maintained by the way primary care services are currently provided - by family practitioner committees, district health authorities, local authorities and voluntary organizations, each with different JL i:'.;JicaPjl ways of working. .Dit.X.1 Pemra Gra . ....i Recent policy documents have done little to promote a strategic policy for primary care as a whole.5 In the green' and white ...s papers,2 primary care was reduced to the .~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ activities of those providing family practitioner and community nursing services, with the emphasis on the former, while the Cumberlege report3 made community nursing the mainstay of primary care. Little attempt has been made to balance the .. '': :'!i.! .-".!.. Ei!.!!;-S!5.!Fl! !l'Ili.:. I~~~~.~....! -i .....J ...j.;:l........;i..
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Primary Care Health Care Workforce Gap Analysis
    Oklahoma Primary Care Health Care Workforce Gap Analysis DRAFT Prepared by OSU Center for Rural Health OSU Center for Health Sciences Tulsa, Oklahoma June 2015 Table of Contents Table of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables........................................................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Background & Data Acquisition ...................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Primary Care Provider Supply ......................................................................................................................... 3 Primary Care Provider Demand ................................................................................................................... 10 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Limitations ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Network Listing | Healthpartners
    DHS-6594C-ENG HealthPartners® Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO) (HMO SNP) Network April 2018 – September 2018 PRIMARY CARE NETWORK LISTING Minnesota Counties: Anoka, Benton, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, Stearns, Washington, Wright HealthPartners 8170 33rd Ave S. P.O. Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1309 Member Services: 952-967-7029 or 1-888-820-4285 (TTY/TDD 711) Oct. 1 – Feb. 14 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. CT, seven days a week Feb. 15 – Sept. 30 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. CT, Monday – Friday healthpartners.com/msho HealthPartners is a health plan that contracts with both Medicare and the Minnesota Medical Assistance (Medicaid) program to provide benefits of both programs to enrollees. Enrollment in HealthPartners depends on contract renewal. HealthPartners MSHO Plan 16697_Print April 2018 H2422 108677 DHS Approved 1/25/2018 1-888-820-4285 Attention. If you need free help interpreting this document, call the above number. ያስተውሉ፡ ካለምንም ክፍያ ይህንን ዶኩመንት የሚተረጉምሎ አስተርጓሚ ከፈለጉ ከላይ ወደተጻፈው የስልክ ቁጥር ይደውሉ። مﻻحظة: إذا أردت مساعدة مجانية لترجمة هذه الوثيقة، اتصل على الرقم أعﻻه. သတိ။ ဤစာရြက္စာတမ္းအားအခမဲ့ဘာသာျပန္ေပးျခင္း အကူအညီလုုိအပ္ပါက၊ အထက္ပါဖုုန္းနံပါတ္ကုုိေခၚဆုုိပါ။ kMNt’sMKal’ . ebIG~k¨tUvkarCMnYyk~¬gkarbkE¨bäksarenHeday²tKit«f sUmehATUrs&BÍtamelxxagelI . 請注意，如果您需要免費協助傳譯這份文件，請撥打上面的電話號碼。 Attention. Si vous avez besoin d’une aide gratuite pour interpréter le présent document, veuillez appeler au numéro ci-dessus. Thov ua twb zoo nyeem. Yog hais tias koj xav tau kev pab txhais lus rau tsab ntaub ntawv no pub dawb, ces hu rau tus najnpawb xov tooj saum toj no.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Practitioner and the Problems of Battered Women
    of medical ethics, 1979, 5, I17-123 journal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.5.3.117 on 1 September 1979. Downloaded from The general practitioner and the problems of battered women Jan Pahl Research Fellow, University ofKent Author's abstract occur in the 'average' practice, and a summary of This paper discusses the responsibility ofgeneral these estimates was presented by the Royal College practitioners who are consulted by women who have of General Practitioners.2 It was suggested that in been physically injured by the men with whom they an average population of 2,500 there would be live. The paper draws on a study of 50 women likely to be about I50 households living on supple- who were interviewed at a refuge for battered mentary benefit, 6o one-parent families, 25 women, and considers the help which they alcoholics, and 3-4 divorces in any one year. Such received, or did not receive, from their general estimates, of course, take no account of variations practitioners. Such women are likely to face from place to place, nor over time: the I970S have many difficulties: it is perhaps the essence of seen a great increase in the numbers of households their problem that, because it is potentially the living on supplementary benefit, and in the numbers concern of so many people, it can so easily of divorces and, consequently, of one parent families.3 Jefferys estimated that 36 - 4 per cent of all become the concern of nobody-except of the those consulting their general practitioners did so woman herself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalist Tradition in General Practice
    The Naturalist Tradition in General Practice I, r, McWhinney, MD London, Ontario For me there have been two great satisfactions of medical practice. One has been the depth of human experience which, as physicians, we are privileged to have. The other has been the satisfaction of observing patients with illnesses of all kinds, in their own habitat, and over long periods of time. This is the kind of satisfaction experienced by all naturalists. I would claim that observation of prognosis and to rational therapeutics. The clinician, then, has much in the natural history of disease is the Suppose, for example, people with common with the naturalist. “Natu­ basic science of medicine. Nowadays schizophrenia were found to have a ralists,” wrote John Ryle,1 “hold cer­ we use the term “basic science” for biochemical abnormality. This dis­ tain attributes in common, notably the what Abraham Flexner called the la­ covery would have no significance desire to establish the truth of things boratory sciences. There is no harm in without the clinical description of a by observing and recording, by classifi­ this as long as we do not mean that the category called schizophrenia, and a cation and analysis.” Like the natural­ laboratory sciences are more funda­ knowledge of its natural course and ist, the clinician makes careful observa­ mental and more scientific than the outcome. tions of his/her patients, classifies their science of clinical observation. Chemis­ Medicine, like other branches of illnesses into categories, then follows try and physics can explain ill health biology, is predominantly an observa­ them to their conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW June 2016
    PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW June 2016 Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. TABLE OF CONTENTS I PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW II APPENDIX: SELECT MARKET PARTICIPANTS PRIMARY CARE SECTOR OVERVIEW The delivery and coordination of primary care is taking on renewed and increasing importance as the system’s gatekeeper in the evolving U.S. healthcare landscape. Primary care accounts for nearly $250 billion of annual industry revenue and over 55% of total office-based physician visits1,2 . However, the systematic under-investment of this integral component of the healthcare system has created a number of well publicized challenges, including: • Insufficient supply of new primary care physicians from medical school • Lower compensation vis-à-vis other specialties • Demands of an aging population outstripping system resources • Under-supply of primary care to rural areas . As the initial contact point for patients, the primary care system will increasingly function as the gatekeeper for care coordination and patient referrals for public and private payors and for healthcare systems . Therefore primary care now fills a critical role in the transition from fee-for-service (“FFS”) to value-based care . To meet these challenges new, innovative primary care practice models have emerged to address care coordination, access and quality of care, and cost, including the following four models highlighted in this report: • Medicare Advantage/Managed Medicaid • Employer Sponsored Health Clinics • Retail Clinics • Concierge Clinics .
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Self-Management Support Programs: an Evaluation
    Final Contract Report ______________________________________________________________________________ Patient Self-Management Support Programs: An Evaluation Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 282-00-0005 Prepared by: RAND Health Santa Monica, CA Marjorie L. Pearson, PhD, MSHS Soeren Mattke, MD, DSc Rebecca Shaw, MA M. Susan Ridgely, JD Shelley H. Wiseman, BA AHRQ Publication No. 08-0011 November 2007 This report was prepared by RAND Health under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 282-00-0005). The views expressed in this report are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content. No statement in this report should be construed as an official endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission. AHRQ appreciates citation as to source. The suggested citation format is: Pearson ML, Mattke S, Shaw R, Ridgely MS, Wiseman SH. Patient Self-Management Support Programs: An Evaluation. Final Contract Report (Prepared by RAND Health under Contract No. 282-00-0005). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2007. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0011. ii Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge and thank the following individuals who participated in interviews for this report. We are grateful
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH and SELF-CARE: a Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-Care
    HEALTH AND SELF-CARE: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care Summer 2019 DrWayneJonas.com HEALTH AND SELF-CARE: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 3 A LETTER FROM DR . WAYNE JONAS . 5 NATIONAL SURVEY INFOGRAPHIC . 7 WHAT DO THE DATA TELL US ABOUT SELF-CARE? . 9 The Evidence Base for Self-Care .. 9 The Samueli Integrative Health Programs/Harris Poll Survey . 10 DEFINING SELF-CARE . 15 Types of Self-Care . 17 Correcting Patient Misconceptions About Self-Care . 18 HOW CAN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH LEAD TO MORE SELF-CARE? . 19 Self-Care’s Role in Integrative Health . 19 Self-Care and Shared Decision Making . 19 SURVEY METHODOLOGY . 20 REFERENCES . 21 Health and Self-Care: A Look Inside Patient and Physician Perspectives on Self-care 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix in ten adults in the U .S . have a chronic disease and four in ten adults have two or more, according Sto the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Conditions such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes are making more people sick every day and will continue to do so without behavior change and self-care. As rates of chronic disease continue to rise, self-care practices will become increasingly important to the nation’s health. This report – developed by Samueli Integrative Health Programs in concert with The Harris Poll – demonstrates the importance of self-care to patients’ health and well-being, explains how to implement self-care services in the healthcare care setting, and discusses the current trends in both doctors’ and patients’ self-care beliefs and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Health Professional in Supporting Self Care
    Quality in Primary Care 2006;14:129–31 # 2006 Radcliffe Publishing Guest editorial The role of the health professional in supporting self care Ruth Chambers DM FRCGP Professor of Primary Care, Faculty of Health and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, and Director of Postgraduate General Practice Education, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK It is widely believed that patients who adopt self care Safety concerns practices, will reduce demand on general practitioners (GPs) and other providers of healthcare as a whole.1 The evidence base that justifies self care is wide- Safety concerns tend not to feature in research reports ranging, but robust evidence of the cost-effectiveness or policies of those advocating or trialling patients’ self of increased self care by patients is awaited, in terms of care;2,5,6 yet there are potential adverse events for most better health outcomes for patients, more appropriate health conditions if medical care is not sought or consultations with the healthcare team, and savings on obtained appropriately.7–10 So, inappropriate self care providing healthcare.1,2 There may be displaced costs. could be costly for the individual person if they suffer For example, more appropriate consultation behav- harm from waiting too long before seeking medical iour by patients with doctors could lead to increased help, or pursue self care with an ineffectual or harmful consultation rates with other primary care professionals treatment. It could rebound on the NHS if the result of such as pharmacists, or with primary
    [Show full text]
  • How Primary Care Produces Better Outcomes: a Logic Model
    How Primary Care Produces Better Outcomes: A Logic Model James W. Mold, MD, MPH Department of Family and Preventive Medicine University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Roger I. Lienke, MD Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Brendan Drew, BS Boulder, Colorado Word Count: Key Words: Primary care, logic model, patient-centered medical home, outcomes, attributes 1 ABSTRACT Context: Greater access to primary care is associated with lower health care costs and better health outcomes. The reasons for this are not entirely clear. In an attempt to clarify the links between primary care and outcomes, we constructed a “logic model” based upon a systematic review of the literature and our clinical experience. Methods: We reviewed all publications from a search of the English language literature from 1966 to the present using the search term, “primary care,” plus potentially relevant references from their bibliographies. We then constructed lists of desired outcomes and intermediate outcomes and summarized the evidence supporting the links between them. The principal attributes of primary care were derived from the Institute of Medicine’s 1996 report.1 To identify and categorize the mechanisms leading from attributes to intermediate outcomes, we relied upon our own clinical experience, the published literature, and from others in the field. Findings: We identified 6 primary attributes (accessibility, coordination, sustained care, comprehensiveness, partnership, and person-centeredness) and two encompassing constructs (integration and accountability) that constitute primary care. Proposed causal links to the 8 desired outcomes pass through 14 mechanisms and 14 intermediate outcomes. Conclusions: We hope this model will stimulate further discussion among policy-makers, researchers, educators, and clinicians working to strengthen primary care, the most logical foundation of the health care system.
    [Show full text]