DOCSLIB.ORG

Myrica Faya) Distribution in Hawaici

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myrica Faya) Distribution in Hawaici F'IRETREE (MYRICA FAYA) DISTRIBUTION IN HAWAICI Louis D. Whiteaker and Donald E. Gardner ABSTRACT The primary objective of this study was to map the distribution and abundance of firetree (Mynca faya) in the state of Hawai'i. Reconnaissance data were used to map 85,912 a (34,365 ha) of infestation throughout the State. Infestations of 72,265 a (28,906 ha) occur on the island of Hawai'i, 4,770 a (1,908 ha) on Maui, 2,518 a (1,007 ha) on Lha'i, 435 a (174 ha) on O'ahu, and 5,925 a (2,370 ha) on Kaua'i. Distribution ranges in elevation from as low as 1,400 ft (425 m) on Liina'i to as high as 6,400 ft (1,940 m) on the slopes of Haleakall on Maui. Firetree occurs on recent, thin ash over pihoehoe lava as well as on deep, well-developed silty clay loam soil. It is found in montane rain forest habitats and in dry scrub (marginal through submontane seasonal) forest. The distribution patterns of firetree suggest that this species - has not yet reached the limits of its potential distribution in Hawai'i. Observations on the phenology of firetree were made at two-week intervals from March 1983 through March 1985. Data were taken at three sites and were related to the data from nearby weather stations. Information on flowering, fruiting (mature and immature), leaf flushing, leaf fall, and fruit drop was collected. Analysis of the phenologic patterns observed showed flowering, fruiting, and fruit drop to be endogenously controlled, while leaf flushing and leaf fall were influenced by environmental variables. INTRODUCTION Fire or faya tree (Myrica faya, Myricaceae) is a native of the Azores, Madeira, and the Canary Islands in the Atlantic Ocean. It was introduced to Hawai'i in the late 1800s by Portuguese immigrants, resumably as an ornamental (Fosberg 1937). Because it forms multiple %ranches near the base of the main stem (Smathers and Gardner 1979), firetree has often been described as a shrub or small tree reaching heights of only 13 to 20 ft (4-6 m) (Fosberg 1937; Neal 1965; Hasselwood and Motter 1983). However, in the H&n&ua region of the island of Hawai'i, firetree Whiteaker and Gardner \ Firehe Distribution in Hawai'i 226 grows to over 50 ft (16 m) high, forrnin dense cano ies with an understory devoid of other plant life (Smathers and sardner 19797. Firetree has narrow, pointed, smooth, shiny, dark green leaves with entire or toothed margins (Neal 1965; Hasselwood and Motter 1983). Although firetree has a strong tendency toward dioecism, a few staminate flowers are found on pistillate plants and a few pistillate flowers are found on staminate plants (Gardner 1985). Staminate flowers with four stamens each are borne on small catkins. Three pistillate flowers that may be joined and accompanied by one bract are also grouped in small catkins. Fruits are small, edible drupes that form dense clusters changing from green through red to purple when ripe (Fosberg 1937; Lawrence 1951; Neal 1965). The purpose of this stud was to map the distribution and abundance of firetree and to observe t ge phenological cycles of this species in the state of Hawai'i. Distribution studies will provide a database for location of all infestations, both for implementation of a biological control pro am, should an appropriate agent be found, and for future studies of t i? e spread of this species in Hawai'i. The phenology data will help to determine the timing of control programs. HISTORY OF SPREAD AND CONTROL EFFORTS The Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association obtained seeds of firetree from a Portuguese farmer on the island of Hawai'i for use in reforestation attempts (Fosberg 1937). Plantings were made on the islands of Kaua'i, O'ahu, and Hawai'i (Skolmen 1979), most of them in the 1920s. The aggressive, noxious character of this s ecies was soon noted, along with its spread to Maui (Fosberg 1937). &e continued spread of firetree led the Territorial Board of Agriculture and Forest to begin attempts to eradicate it in 1944 (Neal 1965). Managers of SX ipman Estate observed firetree spreadin in the Volcano area on the island of Hawai'i in the mid-1940s. In tf e mid-1960s, Shipman attempted to control the species there (T. Lindsey, pers. comm.). It was declared noxious for state land leases because it spreads rapidly and forms a dense cover that crowds out desirable species (Hosaka 1945; Haselwood and Motter 1983). Firetree has continued to spread despite efforts by the State and the National Park Service, and it now occurs on all major Hawaiian Islands except Kaho'olawe, Moloka'i, and Ni'ihau. Estimates of the total infested area have increased over the years: 8,200 a (3,280 ha) 1954), 21,375 a (8,550 ha) (Anonymous 1962), 40,000 a (16,000 and Null 1970), and the most recent estimate, showed to be supporting firetree po ulations of various densities Hawai'i contained 50,000 a &000 ha); Maui, 3,000 a (1,200 ha); O'ahu, 100 a (40 ha); Kaua'i, 325 a (130 ha); and bna'i, 512 a (205 ha). Firetree was thought to occur where average annual rainfall is 35 in. (900 mm) or more in mesic low-elevation forest and wet low- and hi h- elevation forest [vegetation zones C1, C Dl, and % of Ripperton and Hosaka (1942)l (Hosaka and Thistle 195~~non~mous1962f Khiteaker and Gardner \ Firehe Distibution in HawaiS' 227 Within these broad limits, however, the tree can adapt to a wide range of habitats. Clarke 1978 described the distribution of firetree in Hawaii Volcanoes Nation Par 1; as a horizontal band between 2,200 and 4,000 ft (665-1,210 m) elevation, including 11 soil es and 15 of the vegetation units described by Mueller-Dombois and Fos9 erg (1974). Average annual rainfall within this distribution is from 50 in. (1,270 mm) to over 100 in. 2,540 mm), and average annual tem erature ranges from 60 to 72 F (22 C) Clarke 1978). The wide range of Kabitats where firetree has been found suggests that it has not yet occupied its full potential range. An estimated 15,000 a (6,000 ha) of infestation along the Hamakua coast on the island of Hawai'i has been classified as "hea " (Watanabe 1982). In this region firetree grows over 50 ft (16 m) tal7 and forms dense, interlockin canopies with no understory (Smathers and Gardner 1979). The absence oP other plant species under the canopy may be due partially to . However, allelopathic activity has been reported for a closely relateshading, species (M. cerifera) from the southeastern United Stares (Dunevitz and Ewel 1981). Thus, the lack of understow in firetree stands hay be due not only to'canopy -shading, but also to dlelopathic activity (Smith 1985). Current evidence suggests that the seeds of firetree are dispersed primarily by birds (Smathers and Gardner 1979; LaRosa et al. 1985). The extensive, uniform distribution of the tree in remote areas and the close spatial association of this species with other tree species, especially 'ohi'a (Metrosideros polymorpha), suggest dispersal of seeds by birds. Birds commonly associated with dispersal include the Japanese white-eye (Zosterops japonica), the common myna (Acridotheres tristis), the red-billed 'leiothrix (Leiothrix lutea), and the 'oma'o (Phaeomk obsnznrs) (Clarke 1978; Smathers and Gardner 1979; Gardner and Davis 1982; LaRosa et aL 1985). Low germination rates of firetree seeds collected in the field, contrasted with copious seed production and ra id dispersal of the species, has led to the hpothesis that scarification gom bud ingestion greatly improves germination rates (Clarke 1978). This idea was supported by experiments that showed increased amounts and rates of germination due to mechanical or chemical scarification of seeds of M. cerifera (Ewel et al. 1982). However, germination tests of firetree in Hawai'i showed no significant difference m amounts or rates of germination between seeds that passed through captive birds and apparently mature, viable seeds collected in the field from trees (LaRosa et d 1985). Feral pigs Sus scrofa) have also been identified as possible dispersal agents !or seeds of firetree. Firetree seedlings have been observed areas in Hawaii analyses of feral pigs in firetree seeds during certain times of Firetree control efforts have been implemented primarily by the state of Hawai'i and the National Park Service. The effort by the State has been conducted over the last 25 years, but variations in availabili of funding and manpower have resulted in fluctuations in intensity oY this effort. Herbicides are the primary control agents. Of the various herbicides used Whiteaker and Gardner \ Firehe Distribution in Hawai'i 228 by the State, Tordon 22K (picloram) has been the most effective, producin a com lete canopy kill and a 99% control of resproutin (Walters and Nu f1 1970; i! mathers and Gardner 1979; R. Karni, pers. comm.f . In Hawaii Volca- noes National Park, basal bark application of a 4% solution of KURON silvex) in diesel oil was effective, and a method to introduce ROUNDUP glyphosate) directly into the vascular tissue of firetree through a cut branch was su ested for remote areas and less-than-ideal weather conditions (GarCY ner and Kageler 1982 In some areas, pasturelands have been cleared of invading firetree wit b. bulldozers by private landowners. However, follow-up momtoring and/or herbicide treatment of stumps and brush piles are needed with mechanical methods to control resprouting (R. Karni, pers. comm.). F. Bianchi, an exploratory entomologist from Hawai'i, was sent by Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association to the native habitats of firetree in 1955 to search for potential biological control agents.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In China: Phylogeny, Host Range, and Pathogenicity
    Persoonia 45, 2020: 101–131 ISSN (Online) 1878-9080 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.04 Cryphonectriaceae on Myrtales in China: phylogeny, host range, and pathogenicity W. Wang1,2, G.Q. Li1, Q.L. Liu1, S.F. Chen1,2 Key words Abstract Plantation-grown Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) and other trees residing in the Myrtales have been widely planted in southern China. These fungal pathogens include species of Cryphonectriaceae that are well-known to cause stem Eucalyptus and branch canker disease on Myrtales trees. During recent disease surveys in southern China, sporocarps with fungal pathogen typical characteristics of Cryphonectriaceae were observed on the surfaces of cankers on the stems and branches host jump of Myrtales trees. In this study, a total of 164 Cryphonectriaceae isolates were identified based on comparisons of Myrtaceae DNA sequences of the partial conserved nuclear large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA, internal transcribed spacer new taxa (ITS) regions including the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal DNA operon, two regions of the β-tubulin (tub2/tub1) gene, plantation forestry and the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) gene region, as well as their morphological characteristics. The results showed that eight species reside in four genera of Cryphonectriaceae occurring on the genera Eucalyptus, Melastoma (Melastomataceae), Psidium (Myrtaceae), Syzygium (Myrtaceae), and Terminalia (Combretaceae) in Myrtales. These fungal species include Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis, Celoporthe syzygii, Cel. eucalypti, Cel. guang­ dongensis, Cel. cerciana, a new genus and two new species, as well as one new species of Aurifilum. These new taxa are hereby described as Parvosmorbus gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Instructions for The
    FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INVENTORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS 2013 Hawaii Edition Forest Inventory and Analysis Program Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service THIS MANUAL IS BASED ON: FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS VERSION 5.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSES OF THIS MANUAL ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS MANUAL .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 UNITS OF MEASURE ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 PLOT SETUP .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.4 PLOT INTEGRITY ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species
    100 OF THE WORLD’S WORST INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES A SELECTION FROM THE GLOBAL INVASIVE SPECIES DATABASE Published by Contribution to the Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) In Association with SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION Citation Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S., De Poorter M. (2000) 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Published by The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 12pp. First published as special lift-out in Aliens 12, December 2000. Updated and reprinted version: November 2004. Electronic version available at: www.issg.org/booklet.pdf For information, or copies of the booklet in English, French or Spanish, please contact: ISSG Office: School of Geogra- phy and Environmental Sciences (SGES) University of Auckland (Tamaki Campus) Private Bag 92019 Auckland, New Zealand Phone: #64 9 3737 599 x85210 Fax: #64 9 3737 042 E-mail: [email protected] Development of the 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Spe- cies list has been made possible by Cover image: Brown tree snake the support of the Fondation (Boiga irregularis). d’Entreprise TOTAL (1998 - 2000). Photo: Gordon Rodda Printed in New Zealand by: Hollands Printing Ltd Contact: Otto van Gulik Email: [email protected] 2 Biological Invasion What happens when a species is in- The list of “100 of the World’s precedented rate. A number of the troduced into an ecosystem where Worst Invasive Alien Species” in invasive alien species featured in it doesn’t occur naturally? Are eco- this booklet illustrates the incred- this booklet are contributing to systems flexible and able to cope ible variety of species that have the these losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Alien Species in Protected Areas
    INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES AND PROTECTED AREAS A SCOPING REPORT Produced for the World Bank as a contribution to the Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) March 2007 PART I SCOPING THE SCALE AND NATURE OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES THREATS TO PROTECTED AREAS, IMPEDIMENTS TO IAS MANAGEMENT AND MEANS TO ADDRESS THOSE IMPEDIMENTS. Produced by Maj De Poorter (Invasive Species Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission of IUCN - The World Conservation Union) with additional material by Syama Pagad (Invasive Species Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission of IUCN - The World Conservation Union) and Mohammed Irfan Ullah (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bangalore, India, [email protected]) Disclaimer: the designation of geographical entities in this report does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, ISSG, GISP (or its Partners) or the World Bank, concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................6 GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................9 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................12 1.1 Invasive alien
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Species and Temporal Variation in Hawaiian Floral Visitation Networks
    Exotic Species and Temporal Variation in Hawaiian Floral Visitation Networks By Jennifer Lynn Imamura A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor George Roderick, Chair Professor Claire Kremen Professor Bruce Baldwin Spring 2019 Abstract Exotic Species and Temporal Variation in Hawaiian Floral Visitation Networks by Jennifer Lynn Imamura Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor George Roderick, Chair Many studies have documented the negative impact of invasive species on populations, communities, and ecosystems, although most have focused solely on antagonistic rather than mutualistic interactions. For mutualistic interactions, such as pollination, a key to understanding their impacts is how invasive species interact with native species and alter interaction networks. Chapter 1 explores the impacts of invasive species on islands, particularly in regard to plants, pollinators, and how these exotic species attach to existing pollination interaction networks. Island pollination networks differ from mainland counterparts in several important characteristics, including fewer species, more connectance, and increased vulnerability to both invasion and extinction. A progression of invasion has been previously proposed, through which supergeneralist native species
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Distance from Invasive Lythrum Salicaria On
    EFFECTS OF DISTANCE FROM INVASIVE LYTHRUM SALICARIA ON POLLINATOR VISITATION RATE AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN NATIVE LYTHRUM ALATUM A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Anthony Steven Kinyo August, 2005 EFFECTS OF DISTANCE FROM INVASIVE LYTHRUM SALICARIA ON POLLINATOR VISITATION RATE AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN NATIVE LYTHRUM ALATUM Anthony Kinyo Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ _____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Randall J. Mitchell ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Stephen C. Weeks Dr. Charles B. Monroe ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Peter H. Niewiarowski Dr. George R. Newkome ______________________________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous people have helped me during this project and I could not have completed the research without all of their generous support. I would like to begin by thanking Dr. Randy Mitchell for his constant enthusiasm and positive encouragement throughout the research process. Thanks Randy, you have helped me to become a better scientist and researcher and I appreciate all that you have done for me. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Steve Weeks and Dr. Peter Niewiarowski, who provided feedback and assistance throughout the research process. Next, I would like to the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Summit County Metroparks, and Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge for allowing me to pursue my research on their land. The University of Akron Biology Department provided financial assistance. Robert Jean, Donald Webb, Martin Hauser, and John Ascher deserve thanks for helping me to identify the numerous pollinators collected during the experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nodule Biomass of the Nitrogen-Fixing Alien Myricafaya Ait. in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park!
    Pacific Science (1987), vol.41, nos. 1-4 © 1988 by the University of HawaiiPress. All rightsreserved Nodule Biomass of the Nitrogen-Fixing Alien Myrica faya Ait. In Hawaii Volcanoes National Park! D OUGLAS R. TURNER AND PETER M. VITOUSEK 2 ABSTRACT: Myricafaya forms a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis in which fixation takes place in specialized root nodules. The biomass of these nodules was greater in open-grown than shaded individuals ofM yricafaya, and was greater in large than small individuals. All Myricafaya examined, including seedlings and those growing epiphytically, had active nodules. Nitrogen fixation by invading Myrica faya could alter patterns of primary succession in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Myrica faya AlT. IS AN AGGRESSIVE INVADER volcanic ash, and inthe open in volcanic ash of most of the major Hawaiian Islands depo sits as young as 10- 12 years . (Whiteaker and Gardner 1985). It grows rap­ The nitrogen-fixing potential ofthe Myrica/ idly, forms dense, nearly monospecific stands, Frankia symbiosis is of particular concern in and can reach 20 m in height (Smathers and HAva because young volcanic soils are very Gardner 1979). Myricafaya represents a par­ low in available nitrogen (Vitousek et al. 1983, ticularly serious problem because it forms a Balakrishnan and Mueller-Dombois 1983). symbiotic association with the nitrogen-fixing Inva sion by Myrica faya could supplement actinomycete Frankia (Miguel and Rodri­ the slow accumulation of nitrogen from rain­ gues-Barrueco 1974, Mian et al. 1976) and fall and nonsymbiotic fixation with more rap­ hence can use nitrogen from the atmosphere id symbiotic fixation. Since susceptibi lity to rather than the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Aspects of Myrica Esculenta
    Review Article A Review on Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Aspects of Myrica esculenta P. SOOD AND R. SHRI* Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, Punjabi University, Patiala-147 002, India Sood and Shri: A Review on Phyto-pharmacological Aspects of Myrica esculenta Myrica esculenta (Myricaceae) commonly known as box berry or kaphal is an important Indian medicinal plant. It is found in foothill tracks of Eastern Himalayas, Meghalaya, Nepal, China and Pakistan. Local tribes mainly use its fruits to prepare pickle and refreshing drinks. Traditionally, the bark has been used for the treatment of cough, asthma, fever, chronic bronchitis, diarrhoea, rheumatism and inflammation; roots have been used in bronchitis, asthma, cholera and flowers claimed to treat earache, diarrhoea, paralysis. Phytochemical studies of the different parts of plant revealed the presence of various bioactive phytoconstituents such as phenolic compounds, alkaloids, glycosides, triterpenoids and volatile oils. The plant is also reported to have innumerable significant pharmacological activities like analgesic, anxiolytic, antiallergic, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, antiulcer, antioxidant and antiinflammatory evaluated by using various animal models. The objective of the present review article is to compile all the relevant published information regarding traditional uses, phytochemistry and therapeutic potential of M. esculenta. For this purpose various databases and books were examined. The review clearly demonstrates the importance of this plant in ethnomedicine and its immense potential in modern medicine. Key words: Myrica esculenta, kaphal, box berry, phytoconstituents, pharmacology The genus Myrica consists about 97 species of small tree M. esculenta commonly known as Boxberry, Kaiphal and aromatic shrubs belonging to family Myricaceae. and Kathphala has been reported to be the only species These are reported to be globally distributed in both found in India[11].
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Conservation Alliance®S Alien Plant Working Group
    FACT SHEET: FIRE TREE Fire Tree Morella faya (Ait.) Wilbur (previously Myrica faya) Sweet Gale family (Myricaceae) NATIVE RANGE Azores, Madeira, and the Canary islands DESCRIPTION An evergreen shrub or small tree, usually 12-15 feet tall, fire tree can grow to 50 feet in height in some areas. Stems of fire tree are covered with hairs and its leaves are 2-4 inches long, dark green, shiny, smooth, aromatic, and alternate along the stem. Male flowers have four stamens (pollen-bearing structures) and occur in small hanging clusters near the branch tip. Female flowers, also grouped in small hanging clusters, occur in threes, further from the branch tip. The prolific and edible fruits of fire tree are small and red to purple when ripe. ECOLOGICAL THREAT Fire tree poses a serious threat to native plants on young volcanic sites, lowland forests and shrublands, where it forms dense, single- species stands. On the island of Hawaii, fire tree forms a dense canopy with an understory devoid of other plant life. The roots of fire tree manufacture nitrogen, which allows it to invade recent, nutrient-poor volcanic sites much sooner than native plants. Invasion by fire tree on these sites prevents typical plant community succession from occurring. DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES Fire tree occurs on nearly all of the major Hawaiian islands (Maui, Hawaii, Kauai, Oahu, and Lanai). In the late 1980s, it covered more than 100,000 acres in the Hawaiian islands and fire tree continues to expand throughout the islands. HABITAT IN THE UNITED STATES Fire tree adapts to a wide range of habitats and soil types – from thin ash over lava to deep, well developed, silty-clay or loam soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrica Faya: Review of the Biology, Ecology, Distribution, and Control, Including an Annotated Bibliography Candace J
    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIWRSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 (808) 956-821 8 Technical Report 94 Myrica faya: Review of the Biology, Ecology, Distribution, and Control, Including an Annotated Bibliography Candace J. Lutzow-Felling, Donald E. Gardner, George P. Markin, Clifford W. Smith UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Cooperative Agreement CA 8037-2-0001 April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... 111 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 DESCRIPTIVE BIOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2 Systematics .................................... ............................................................................ 2 Anatomy ..................................................................................................................... 4 Growth Form ................................................................................................................ 4 Reproductive Structures ...............................................................................................5 Inflorescence ...................... ... ..........................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Extinctions, Rediscoveries, and New Plant Records Within The
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2011. Edited by 91 Neal L. Evenhuis & Lucius G. Eldredge. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 113: 91 –102 (2012) Possible Extinctions , Rediscoveries, and New Plant Records within the Hawaiian Islands 1 KeNNetH R. W ooD 2 National Tropical Botanical Garden, 3530 Papalina Road, Kalaheo, Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i 96741, USA; email: [email protected] eleven possible new extinctions are reported for the Hawaiian flora, in addition to 5 island records, 3 range rediscoveries, 1 rediscovery, and 1 new naturalized record. the remark - able range rediscoveries of Ctenitis squamigera (Dryopteridaceae) and Lysimachia filifo - lia (Primulaceae) give hope toward their future conservation, as both are federally listed as endangered and were undocumented on Kaua‘i for ca 100 years. Yet there is great con - cern over numerous possible plant extinctions in Hawai‘i. two extinctions were recently reported from Kaua‘i (i.e., Dubautia kenwoodii and Cyanea kuhihewa ) (Wood 2007), and an additional 11 are now reported to have no known living individuals in the wild. Species abundance will naturally fluctuate, yet for very rare taxa there is little room for decline. the ongoing decline of native pollinators (Kearns et al. 1998) and seed dispersers (Mil - berg & tyrberg 1993), in combination with other primary extrinsic factors such as inva - sive nonnative plants, predation by introduced vertebrates, loss and fragmentation of nat - ural habitats, and devastation by severe storms, are leading to an increase in extinctions throughout the islands of oceania (Sakai et al. 2002; Wood 2007; Kingsford et al. 2009). the assertion of extinction is potentially fallible and can only be inferred from absence of sighting or collection records (Solow & Roberts 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Alien Species on Island Ecosystems: Extended Abstracts of a Symposium, 30 May 1991, Honolulu, Hawaii, XVII Pacific Science Congress 1
    Pacific Science (1992), vol. 46, no. 3: 383-404 © 1992 by University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved The Impact of Alien Species on Island Ecosystems: Extended Abstracts of a Symposium, 30 May 1991, Honolulu, Hawaii, XVII Pacific Science Congress 1 ROBERT H. COWIE2 The unique and fragile ecosystems of small, tropical, oceanic islands are more and more being challenged by both deliberate and inadvertent artificial introduc­ tions of alien species. That island species, especially endemics, are highly vulnerable to such introductions, and manifest a rate of extinction far in excessofthat ofcontinental species, is becoming widely accepted (e.g., Diamond 1984, Atkinson 1989). The Hawaiian Islands, with their high levels ofendemism and spectacular evolutionary radiations in many groups of both plants and animals, arguably have suffered the most severe impacts. The extremely high rate of extinction of the native biota and the modification of native habitat in the Hawaiian Islands are often, but not always, attributable to introduced predators, parasites, competitors, and so forth. Itwas therefore highly appropri­ ate that this symposium be held in Honolulu. Many of the presentations dealt with Hawaiian instances, reflecting not only the affiliations of the participants but also the concentration of the problems in Hawaii (and indeed the acute awareness of them, at least on the part of biologists). Nonetheless, the geographical coverage was broad-from Singapore to Hawaii and Guam to New Caledonia and the Society Islands. The subject matter was also broad, ranging widely across the plant and animal kingdoms, from trees to flies, snails to geckos. And, although many participants recounted numerous, depressing case histories, a positive, forward-looking management approach was often intimated and in some instances expounded.
    [Show full text]