DOCSLIB.ORG

Methanizing the Mediterranean Area. TRIESTE & ROME 10-11/06/2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methanizing the Mediterranean Area. TRIESTE & ROME 10-11/06/2015 Methanizing the Mediterranean Area. TRIESTE & ROME 10-11/06/2015 FROM NORTH AND BALTIC SEA TO THE MEDITERRANEAN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LNG CHAIN Tord johnsson Area, Business development manager, Europe & Africa Oil & Gas Business WÄRTSILÄ POWER PLANTS Introduction – Wärtsilä Corporation 19,000 professionals Solutions for Marine / Offshore Power Generation Net sales by business 2014 Ship Power Services 36% Efficiency Flexibility Environmental 40% solutions • Listed in Helsinki LEADER IN LEADER • 4.8 billion € turnover Power Plants • Solid financial standing 24% 4 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Market Drivers • EU is driving the development of LNG infrastucture out of two reasons o Enviromental and the EU clean fuel strategy mainly related to the transport sector both at sea and at land with stricter emission legislation. ° First SECA area that went into force 1 January 2015 was the Baltic Sea and for part of North Sea with Mediterranean and remaining part of North Sea to follow in 2020 with the aim to have LNG bunkering facitilties in 139 ports. ° Blue Corridor with LNG truck filling stations each 400 km and CNG car filling stations each 150 km . o Security of Supply, with the largely dependance on Russia for EU’s natural gas imports, EU wants to diversify its natural gas imports by both promote new pipeline like TAP and TANAP as well as increase the number of LNG receiving terminals. ° The recent decision for cancellation of the Russia’s South Stream pipeline project has reiterated calls for the rapid and structured development of an energy union within EU, which will have an impact on the LNG imports and purchasing developments. ° Azerbaijan and Turkey are important countries in the Southern Corridor and as partners to EU in this aspect. LEGEND • Cost, energy efficiency SECA Sulfur Emission Controlled Area TAP Trans Adriatic Pipeline • Renewable, infrastructure commonality TANAP Trans Anatolian Na tural Gas Pipeline 5 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG cleanest shipping fuel available Emission -25% values [%] 100 90 80 70 -85% 60 50 40 CO 2 -99% 30 NO x 20 -95% SO x 10 Particulates 0 Diesel Dual-Fuel engine engine in gas mode 6 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Choice of Fuel / Technology • Existing /Future Regulation • Low Sulfur MGO • Scrubber technology • Alternative fuels to LNG Source; Terntank Rederi A/S 7 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Wärtsilä Dual-Fuel References MERCHANT OFFSHORE SPECIALS DF CONVERSION 2 STROKE DF DF POWER PLANTS 732 ENGINES132 ENGINES 61 ENGINES 28 ENGINES 11 ENGINES 352 ENGINES 168 LNG carriers 24 Offshore supply 9 Ferries 4 FPSO vessels 4 Chemical tankers 75 plants 8 Multigas carriers 5 FPSO vessels 6 Tugs 2 RORO vessels 4 Container vessels Output 4877 MW 2 Product tankers 4 FSRU vessels 3 ROPAX vessels 1 Chemical tanker 3 LNG carriers Online since 1997 1 Bulk tanker 2 Platforms 1 Navy vessel 1 Ferry 1 CNG carrier 1 FSO vessel 1 Icebreaker 1 IWW vessel 1 IWW vessel 1 Guide ship >1,300 engines >12 million running hours 8 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG as future volume in shipping DMA study LNG demand 1.8 -5.5 million ton in 2020. DNV high scenario 5.000 LNG fuelled ships globally by 2020. Availability and price will determine the market in 2020. 10 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Views from part of the LNG Value Chain Source; SkanGas 11 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Economical and funding aspects for Ship owner ° Energy efficiency ° Propulsion ° Ship design °EU-support for new technologies/fuels Motorways of Seas /TEN-T etc ° Nox fond support for reduction of Nox ° Reduction of Fairways Dues °Early movers rebate at Ports 16 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG volume & share of total gas is growing Growth of LNG • LNG supply • Shares of global gas consumption Bcf/d Bcf/d 80 40% 60 30% 40 20% 20 10% 0 0% 1990 2005 2020 2035 1990 2005 2020 2035 Other Africa Australia US Russia Qatar Total trade Pipeline LNG BP Energy outlook 2035 9 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Focus on markets and solutions where we can deliver best value for customers HFO & DF UTILITY GAS LNG SPECIAL APPLICATIONS Maintain leading Grow strongly in Small and medium Grow in: position in HFO & large utility gas scale LNG terminal • Nuclear dual-fuel power power plant EPC emergency power plant markets markets • CHP • Oil & Gas • Biofuels 12 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG infrastructure and synergies within Wärtsilä • Small to medium scale LNG terminal market expected to grow • Increasing demand for decentralised power plants, energy intensive industries in remote areas & local gas grids • LNG has huge potential as fuel for ships Regional gas availability enables • Decentralised Smart Power Generation • Flexible gas power plants on islands supporting renewable energy • Gas and dual-fuel ships • Need for new small size LNG carriers • Building the infrastructure is key 13 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG Receiving Terminals + potential additional terminal off-takers LNG Carrier 120 000 – 140 000 m3 LNG Import Terminal Power Plant/Industry 10 000 – 160 000 m3 50 – 500 MW The development project must be feasible based on key elements (example) National grid gas pipeline Additional off-takers might be a bonus Power Plant in specific projects but shall not be a Trans Shipments LNG 15 – 200 MW must for the feasibility of a terminal 1 000 – 10 000 m3 SatelliteTerminal (= long project development time) Port Additional off-takers will increase the terminal Ship Bunkering Fuel LNG volume ( → lower EUR/MWh price of 200 – 2 000 m3 Industry LNG) but will also allocate increased cost of both CAPEX and OPEX for the overall project. LNG Power Plant 10 – 50 MW LNG Tank Trucks SatelliteTerminal 30 – 60 m3 14 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Supply Chain – making LNG available for offtakers - what is the price of LNG ? STS transfer LNG production Main distribution Storage Power Generation LNG import Source; SkanGas & Wärtsilä Local distribution 15 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG Value Chain €/MWh Value Chain LNG as bunker fuel – Average Case Example € 70,00 € 60,42 € 60,00 € 12,45 € 50,00 € 4,88 € 4,23 € 3,13 € 40,00 € 35,73 € 30,00 € 20,00 € 10,00 TTF TTF €26/MWh € 0,00 Commodity Terminal X re-loading Shipping Terminal X Terminal Y handling, 100 % MGO (avg) - incl BOG surcharge to Terminal Y using including re-loading in room for small LNGC (7.500 bunkerbarge (avg) bunkerparties and m3) shipowners to invest 16 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson LNG Infrastructure • In the Nordics and Baltics there are already several terminals and production facilities. • Different sizes of terminals are under construction and being planned in the region. • EU and national funding. • The infrastructure is being developed 17 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Manga, Tornio, Finland– A Significant Environmental Milestone MANGA, TORNIO, FINLAND ”The Tornio Manga LNG terminal is a long-term infrastructure investment programme. The beneficiaries include shipping and road transportation companies, power and heat utilities, as well as other industrial and mining companies in northern Europe. We appreciate Wärtsilä’s participation as a valuable partner in this project with special value-adding capabilities in this field.” Pekka Erkkilä, Chairman of the Board, Manga LNG OY (Jan 2014) 18 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Manga, Tornio, Finland - Project site 19 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Manga, Tornio, Finland - Main data • Client: Manga LNG Oy • Region / Country: Tornio, Finland • Scope: EPC • Estimated start up: Early 2018 • Tank net volume: 50 000m 3 • Ship unloading rate: 3 000m3/h • Outlet gas pressure: 6.0 barg • LNG in-tank pumps: 3 x 175m3/h • End user: Outokumpu Tornio steel mill, mines, factories and other industrial customers in Northern Finland and Sweden 20 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Wärtsilä provides technology and services throughout the entire LNG distribution chain 21 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Power Plant, 5x20V34 with Integrated LNG Storage 22 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Summary & Conclusion • Wärtsilä LNG Business have just started and is here to stay – LNG will be the energy of the 21st century • Wärtsilä is an EPC provider of LNG liquefaction plants in our market Small & Medium scale ( 4 000 – 300 000 TPA ) liquefaction plants for domestic use and export. • Wärtsilä is an EPC provider of LNG import terminal plants with or without power plants and our market is Small & Medium scale ( 5 000 – 160 000 m3 storage) import terminals plants for domestic and regional use and import/export. • Wärtsilä will form a important part of the LNG value chain LNG IS THE FUTURE ENERGY Already today ! 23 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2016
    AnnualGeneral Report Manager’s and Accounts Report 2016 SIGTTO Society for International Gas Tanker and Terminal Operators Ltd Continually promoting best practice in the liquefied gas shipping and terminal industries for 38 years SIGTTO Annual Report Annual SIGTTO and Accounts 2016 1 SIGTTO Purpose SIGTTO has been organised to encourage the safe and responsible operation of liquefied gas tankers and marine terminals handling liquefied gas; to develop advice and guidance for best industrial practice among its members; and to promote criteria for best practice to all who have responsibilities for, or interest in, the safety of gas tankers and terminals. SIGTTO 2020 Vision (Where the Society wishes to see itself in 2020, according to its Strategic Plan) SIGTTO will be recognised as the foremost gas shipping and terminal industry body - a modern centre of industry expertise - with all appropriate resources available to address industry technical and operational issues. It will be the industry advocate for the proactive enhancement of safe and sustainable international gas terminal and shipping operations through the provision of consistent guidelines and measures. Contents SIGTTO Annual Report 2016 Contents 5 President’s report 15 SIGTTO Secretariat 30 Hot off the presses David Furnival presents The Society’s Secretariat Review of latest industry an overview of outstanding office staff best practice publications progress in a notable year from SIGTTO 16 SIGTTO committees 7 General Manager’s report and subcommittees 30 Publications list Andrew
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport, 2005
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Geneva REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT, 2005 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2005 ii Review of Maritime Transport, 2005 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * * * Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, with reference to the document number (see below). A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2005 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.05.II.D.14 ISBN 92-1-112674-6 ISSN 0566-7682 Contents, Introduction and Summary iii CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Cng Carriers Applied to Remote Marginal Gas Field Developments
    CNG CARRIERS APPLIED TO REMOTE MARGINAL GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENTS C. N. White, EnerSea Transport LLC, US S. McClure, Alan C. McClure Associates Inc., US S. J. Rowe, BMT Fluid Mechanics Limited, UK Prof. D. A. Friis, Centre for Marine CNG, Memorial University of Newfoundland, NL, Canada SUMMARY This paper examines applications of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) carriers, using event-domain simulations to assess transportation system operating efficiency. This new gas transport system requires very limited investment in infrastructure dedicated to a specific field. As confirmed in a recent study for a leading US energy company, it is even possible that gas wells for certain reservoirs can flow directly onto the ship and into storage without any significant in- field investment beyond traditional subsea tie-back facilities. That study investigated the feasibility of developing an ultra-deep water gas field by producing directly from subsea wells into a pair of Gas Production/Storage Shuttles (GPSS™) that alternate between producing and transporting duties. These shuttles are designed using EnerSea Transport’s patented technology for volume-optimized transport and storage of CNG (VOTRANS™). CNG marine transport allows emerging, energy-hungry markets around the globe to access gas reserves that would otherwise continue to remain stranded. The scalable CNG solution may also help energy operators to globally reduce the amount of energy being flared or wasted. As compared to other solutions for de-stranding of gas reserves (LNG & GTL technologies), the shipping of CNG offers a solution that significantly limits the wastage of gas resources that are needed in the emerging markets and the amount of captive investment required of operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Mediterranean: Addressing Gas Export Challenges
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN: ADDRESSING GAS EXPORT CHALLENGES The Eastern Mediterranean is a complex environment for gas producers and countries aspiring to become gas exporters in the next few years. Not only do they have to deal with the usual industry challenges, but they also have to manage with an even tougher factor: geopolitics. A recent report commissioned by the Norwegian government highlights such difficulties by indicating, among other things, that Israel constitutes a high risk for exporting gas. The report anticipates the country – which boasts the most developed oil and gas sector and the largest proven reserves among newcomers in the Eastern Mediterranean – will have more difficulty exporting its excess gas than, say, Brazil, Angola, or Mozambique. Cyprus faces similar difficulties. Its plans to build an LNG plant in Vasilikos are in doubt since such a plant would require more gas than what has been discovered so far in Aphrodite to justify the construction of this multi-billion dollar facility, although ongoing exploration in the Island’s exclusive economic zone could result in the discovery of new gas fields. On paper, the most reasonable way to monetize Aphrodite’s (and part of Leviathan’s) gas is through a pipeline to Turkey, a large market seeking to diversify its gas supplies. But this option is not feasible unless significant progress is made in the negotiations between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. A pipeline to Greece is not an easy feat and carries an exorbitant price tag. Egypt, with its large market and two underused LNG plants in Damietta and Idku could be an option, either to supply the local market or to liquefy the gas and export it to world markets.
    [Show full text]
  • CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized CNG for commercialization of small volumes of associated gas Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING S.A. Public Disclosure Authorized October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 5 The CNG Chain ......................................................................................................... 5 Production ........................................................................................................... 5 Transportation ..................................................................................................... 6 Examples of CNG chain costs ................................................................................ 7 CNG market overview ............................................................................................. 9 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 10 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11 1.1. Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 11 1.2. Constraints for the recovery of associated gas as CNG .............................. 15 1.2.1. Nature
    [Show full text]
  • Galway Energy Advisors LLC Delivering Global Energy Transactions
    Galway Energy Advisors LLC Delivering Global Energy Transactions LNG and Natural Gas Import and Delivery Options Evaluation for PREPA’s Northern Power Plants – Feasibility Study & Fatal Flaw Evaluation Submitted to Puerto Rico Public-Private Partnership Authority And Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 1st June 2015 3050 Post Oak Blvd #1300 , Houston, TX, USA 77056 www.galwaygroup.com #22-04, Suntec Tower 3, Singapore, 038988 Galway Energy Advisors LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 1 – Study Background, Requirements, and Methodology ............................................................... 3 Study Background ................................................................................................... 3 PREPA’s NAtural Gas Requirements ..................................................................... 4 Natural Gas volumes requirements ............................................................. 5 Infrastructure SCOPE .................................................................................. 5 Study Methodology ................................................................................................. 7 Potentional Options List .............................................................................. 7 Environmental Assessment ....................................................................... 11 technical Assessment ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PNG, an Innovative System to Transport Gas Economically
    Pipeline Technology 2006 Conference PNG, an Innovative System to Transport Gas Economically Oskar Reepmeyer EUROPIPE GmbH Germany 1. Abstract Natural gas can be brought to the consumer by a fleet of ships with compressed natural gas (CNG) technology. Different proposals for transportation of gas by ship directly from the field to the consumer without the use of costly liquefaction, re-gasification and storage plants have been evaluated for many years. A new type of ship has been introduced having a large number of vertical pipes, designed according to enhanced pipeline design principles transporting compressed natural gas. The weight of the containment system is 50% less of the weight required by con- ventional pressure vessel design codes, making possible a large storage volume. Ships have so far been designed to transport up to 34 MSm3 gas on each voyage. The presented concept for compressed natural gas was introduced by Knutsen OAS Shipping and has been developed with assistance from EUROPIPE GmbH and Det Norsk Veritas. Economic evaluations show that the new Knutsen PNG® is able to fill the gap in the medium range transportation between pipelines and LNG transport for distances up to 3,000 nautical miles. The advantage is less investment in infrastructure and greater flexibility. This new solution is best suited for so called stranded gas fields which are either to small or to far away from the marked to be connected economically by the so far known technologies, pipe line and/or LNG. The potential market for CNG carriers is large as more than half of the world’s known reserves are associated and stranded gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Gas by Russian CNG Ships: Becoming a Closer Reality
    NA Jul-Aug - p46, 48.qxd 26/07/2006 10:25 Page 48 RUSSIA resistant fixed platform for the Korchagin field requirements are being imposed on those Since 1998, the international seminars in the North Caspian Sea, and the Varandey personnel involved in the process of 'Substandard Shipping - Solution through ice-resistant tanker loading unit in the Arctic classification and statutory surveys. Partnership' have become a traditional forum Timano-Pechorskaya region. The latter will The society has been undertaking, together for discussing the most vital issues of be located 22km off the coast where the water with a number of Russian research institutions, maritime safety by members of the world depth exceeds 17m, to enable operation of a complex series of research projects aimed at maritime community. In 2005, those ice-classed tankers of 40,000dwt to quantifying the influence of the human problems connected with the negative impact 70,000dwt. A mooring and loading element upon maritime safety and in of man's activities upon the marine installation capable of revolving through developing techniques to upgrade the safety environment were discussed at the eighth 360deg is to be fitted on the upper hull, with management systems of shipping companies. seminar. a cargo arm to ensure single-point mooring, The results of this research were submitted At a forthcoming meeting, speakers will delivery of a hose to a tanker's manifold, and for consideration by the 53rd session of IMO's present both a thorough analysis of the ISM loading of oil. Marine Environment Protection Committee. Code implementation experience, together IMO supported the RS work and recognised it with an evaluation of this instrument Accent on safety as one of the most promising issues in those efficiency and its influence upon maritime RS is making extensive efforts in parallel to activities connected with the human element safety enhancement and marine environment its commitment to ensuring high standards of study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Question of Rigs, of Rules, Or of Rigging the Rules?
    A Question of Rigs, of Rules, or of Rigging the Rules? A Question of Rigs, of Rules, or of Rigging the Rules? Upstream Profits and Taxes in US Gulf Offshore Oil and Gas JUAN CARLOS BOUÉ With EDGAR JONES Published by the Oxford University Press For the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies 2006 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford Institute for Energy Studies 2006 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (maker) First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights
    [Show full text]
  • Cng Transportation Utilizing Composite Pressure Vessels
    CNG TRANSPORTATION UTILIZING COMPOSITE PRESSURE VESSELS Steven Campbell, Trans Ocean Gas Inc. INTRODUCTION The following paper describes an innovative method of CNG transportation. The method utilizes composite pressure vessels which are derived from the national defense / aerospace, and natural gas vehicle industries. The method overcomes all of the deficiencies anticipated from other proposed methods of CNG transportation that propose to use steel based gas containment systems. Existing container ships may be optimized through the use of the cassette gas containment system. The cassette system also isolates composite gas pressure vessels from ship-induced forces. Being modular, installation and removal of cassettes would be relatively easy. The cassette storage system will provide significant economic advantage over potential competitors commencing with a pilot project. This paper will conclude that The Trans Ocean Gas CNG Transportation Method offers a high level of safety, reliability, and economic feasibility. BACKGROUND The first Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) pilot project using steel pressure vessels mounted on the deck of a ship was conducted off the coast of New Jersey in 1966. It was concluded as not being feasible since the weight of steel pressure vessels required would be too heavy for the host ship to carry. CNG development then stagnated for thirty years. Over the past decade, the increased lucrative potential of CNG has renewed interest and spawned several innovative concepts. All but one proposed method use steel containment systems, which still have issues of safety, corrosion, excessive weight, and cost. All of the proposed methods using steel containment systems are requesting factors of safety less than that of the ASME code.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Rationale for the Movable Pipeline Technology for Transporting Cng by Sea
    Management Systems in 2020, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp. 168-177 Production Engineering Date of submission of the article to the Editor: 01/2020 DOI 10.2478/mspe-2020-0025 Date of acceptance of the article by the Editor: 06/2020 SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR THE MOVABLE PIPELINE TECHNOLOGY FOR TRANSPORTING CNG BY SEA Oleh MANDRYK, Volodymyr ARTYM, Mariana SHTOHRYN Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Valerii ZAYTSEV National University of Shipbuilding, Mykolaiv Abstract: A new efficient CNG module design for the transportation of natural gas by sea is proposed and substantiated. A mathematical model for determining the technical and economic parameters of a movable pipeline module, which is designed for transporting natural gas in a compressed state and consists of a frame structure, the dimensions of which correspond to the 40-foot marine container size and a pipe coil is described. To facilitate construction, it is proposed that a large portion of the coil be made in the form of a two-layer composite construction. The inner layer consists of standard steel tubes or adapters, and the outer layer is fiberglass wound on them. On the basis of the mathematical model an algorithm and a program were compiled, which allowed to determine the technical and economic parameters of the movable pipeline module. The results obtained for the Caspian region are analyzed. Key words: compressed natural gas, movable pipeline, parent vessel, marine freight INTRODUCTION be incorrect, as both technologies are designed to work The issue of transporting natural gas and using it as the effectively across gas transportation projects of different main energy source is extremely important.
    [Show full text]
  • WIDER Working Paper 2021/6-Capturing Economic And
    WIDER Working Paper 2021/6 Capturing economic and social value from hydrocarbon gas flaring and venting: solutions and actions Etienne Romsom and Kathryn McPhail* January 2021 Abstract: This second paper on hydrocarbon gas flaring and venting builds on our first, which evaluated the economic and social cost (SCAR) of wasted natural gas. These emissions must be reduced urgently for natural gas to meet its potential as an energy-transition fuel under the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and to improve air quality and health. Wide-ranging initiatives and solutions exist already; the selection of the most suitable ones is situation-dependent. We present solutions and actions in a four-point (‘Diamond’) model involving: (1) measurement of chemicals emitted, (2) accountability and transparency of emissions through disclosure and reporting, (3) economic deployment of technologies for (small-scale) gas monetization, and (4) an ‘all-of- government’ approach to regulation and fiscal measures. Combining these actions in an integrated framework can end routine flaring and venting in many oil and gas developments. This is particularly important for low- and middle-income countries: satellite data since 2005 show that 85 per cent of total gas flared is in developing countries. Satellite data in 2017 identified location and amount of natural gas burned for 10,828 individual flares in 94 countries. Particular focus is needed to improve flare quality and capture natural gas from the 1 per cent ‘super-emitter’ flares responsible for 23 per cent of global natural gas flared. Key words: energy transition, gas, health, climate, air quality JEL classification: Q3, Q4, Q5 Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Tony Addison and Alan Roe for reading and commenting on an earlier version of this paper.
    [Show full text]