A Question of Rigs, of Rules, Or of Rigging the Rules?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Question of Rigs, of Rules, Or of Rigging the Rules? A Question of Rigs, of Rules, or of Rigging the Rules? A Question of Rigs, of Rules, or of Rigging the Rules? Upstream Profits and Taxes in US Gulf Offshore Oil and Gas JUAN CARLOS BOUÉ With EDGAR JONES Published by the Oxford University Press For the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies 2006 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford Institute for Energy Studies 2006 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (maker) First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 57 Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6FA You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Cover designed by Clare Hofmann Typeset by Philip Armstrong, Sheffield Printed by The Alden Group, Oxford ISBN 0-19-920575-2 978-0-19-920575-2 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 CONTENTS List of Figures viii List of Tables xv Abbreviations xvii Acknowledgements xx 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE US GULF OF MEXICO: A GEOGRAPHICAL PRIMER 13 2.1 Political and Administrative Division 14 2.2 Key Producing Areas 21 3 THE SHALLOW WATER SUPRASALT 30 3.1 From Tidelands to ‘Dead Sea’ 31 3.2 Trends in Hydrocarbons Production and Major Producing Fields 47 3.3 Outlook 57 4 THE SHALLOW WATER SUBSALT 67 4.1 Antecedents 67 4.2 Breakthrough? 69 4.3 A False Dawn 73 5 THE DEEP GAS PROVINCE 78 5.1 Antecedents 78 5.2 First Taste of Difficult Deep Gas: the Offshore Norphlet Formation 81 5.3 A Predictable Policy Response 83 5.4 The Rationale for Deep Gas Royalty Relief 85 5.5 Can Deep Gas Royalty Relief Deliver? 89 5.6 Whither the US Natural Gas Market? 94 v 6 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE DEEP WATER 111 6.1 The Deep Frontier: Chronicle of a Conquest Foretold 113 6.2 Bullwinkle and the Transformation of Deepwater Economics 117 6.3 Conclusions 121 7 DEEPWATER OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION 130 7.1 Deepwater Field Profiles 131 7.2 The Deepwater Gas Problem 139 7.3 Deepwater Oil Prospects: Local Surpluses? 143 7.4 Future Deepwater Oil Growth: How Fast? 152 8 HOW LONG CAN THE DEEPWATER BOOM LAST? 163 8.1 The Promise of the Ultradeepwater 165 8.2 Will FPSOs Do the Trick? 173 8.3 Maximising Subsea Recovery 181 8.4 Can Fiscal Incentives Sustain the Deepwater Boom? 185 8.4.1 Deepwater Royalty Relief 188 8.4.2 Can Royalty Relief Succeed Where Areawide Leasing Failed? 193 9 DEEPWATER ECONOMICS 212 9.1 Finding and Development Costs 213 9.2 Lifting Costs 222 9.3 The Income Dimension 225 9.4 Just How Generous Is the GOM Fiscal Regime? 236 9.5 The Most Profitable Petroleum Province in the World? Only for Colossi… 240 10 COMPETITION IN THE MARKET FOR GOM LEASES: THE GREAT CASUALTY OF AREAWIDE LEASING 249 10.1 The Official Verdict on AWL and Competition: a Critique 249 10.2 The Market for OCS Acreage: from Functional to Genuinely Cursed? 256 10.3 The Relationship between Signalling Devices and High Upfront Costs 269 vi 10.4 Effects of AWL on Lease Inventory Turnover 281 10.5 Effects of the Ownership of Pipelines and Processing Hubs on Access to Infrastructure and on Ultimate Recovery 289 10.6 No Outright Collusion. The One Bright Spot for AWL? 294 10.7 By Way of Conclusion 299 11 CONCLUSIONS: WHAT SHOULD THE WORLD LEARN FROM THE SUCCESS STORY OF THE DEEPWATER GOM? 321 11.1 Basin Mastery: Adding Value in Global E&P Activities 323 11.2 The Political Economy (and Costs) of Basin Mastery 329 11.3 The Issue of Tax Breaks 339 11.4 Final Reflections 342 APPENDIX I: CALCULATING FEDERAL TAX LIABILITIES ON INCOME FROM UPSTREAM ACTIVITIES IN THE GOM FEDERAL OCS 364 BIBLIOGRAPHY 372 INDEX 390 vii LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Gulf of Mexico Federal OCS Planning Areas and Administrative Subdivisions 15 2.2 Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Area Distribution by Depth 17 2.3 Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Area Distribution by Depth 17 2.4 Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Area, Extension under Lease by Depth 18 2.5 Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Area, Extension under Lease by Depth 18 2.6 Gulf of Mexico Western Gap 19 2.7 Average Size of Deepwater Fields in Selected Oil Provinces 23 2.8 Distribution of Crude Oil Families in GOM 25 2.9 Schematic Representation of GOM Sub-provinces 27 3.1 Annual Platform Installations and Removals in the GOM Federal OCS, 1953–2005 40 3.2 Natural Decline Rate in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water Gas Fields, and Equivalent Potential Production Loss absent New Drilling, 1992–2001 41 3.3 Oil Well Productivity Indicators for GOM Federal OCS, by Production Rate Bracket, 1947–2004 42 3.4 Percentage of Output for GOM Federal OCS Oil Wells, by Production Rate Bracket, 1947–2015 43 3.5 Percentage of Output for GOM Federal OCS Natural Gas Wells, by Production Rate Bracket, 1952–2015 44 3.6 Combined Monthly Natural Gas Output for all Wells in the GOM Federal OCS, by Drilling Year Vintage, 1972–2000 45 3.7 Total Hydrocarbon Reserves to Production Ratio in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water Sub-province, 1970–2000 46 3.8 Hydrocarbons Production in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water Sub-province, 1957–2002 47 3.9 GOM Federal OCS Crude Oil Production Profile, by Decade, 1947–2001 51 viii 3.10 GOM Federal OCS Natural Gas Production Profile, by Decade, 1947–2001 51 3.11 Production Profile of VR014 Field, 1960–2004 52 3.12 Production Profile of MP250 Field, 1997–2004 53 3.13 Production Profile of EW910 Field, 1998–2004 53 3.14 Production Profile of WD30 Field, 1955–2004 54 3.15 Production Profile of BM002 Field, 1955–2004 54 3.16 Production Profile of EI330 Field, 1972–2004 55 3.17 Creaming Curve for Fields in the GOM Shallow Water Sub-province, as of 2000 57 3.18 Mean Field Size of New Discoveries in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water, 1965–2001 58 4.1 Water Depth and True Vertical Depth for Selected GOM Subsalt Wells, (Shallow and Deep Water) 71 4.2 Monthly Hydrocarbons Production in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water Subsalt Province, 1997–2004 73 5.1 Monthly Gross Gas Production from Offshore Deep Wells in the Norphlet Formation, 1988–2004 82 5.2 Natural Gas Output from Deep Wells in the GOM Federal OCS Shallow Water, 1990–2013 89 5.3 Total (Exploratory and Development) Wells Drilled to a TVD of 15,000 Feet or More, in Water Depths of 1000 Feet or Less, in the GOM Federal OCS, 1950–2005 90 5.4 Production Profile of ST204 Field, 2001–2004 91 5.5 Production Profile of HI202 Field, 2001–2004 92 5.6 Production Profiles from Inception of Selected Deep Gas Offshore Fields 93 5.7 Net Additions to US Electricity Generation Capacity by Utilities and Independent Power Producers, by Fuel Type, 1991–2009 97 5.8 Behaviour of Selected US Natural Gas Sector Indicators, 1990–2005 99 5.9 Additional US Coal-fired Electricity Generation Capacity, by Project Status and Estimated Onstream Date, 2006–2015 102 6.1 Deepwater Leases as a Proportion of Total Leases Assigned in the GOM Federal OCS, 1974–2004 111 6.2 Cumulative GOM Deepwater Production by Year of Lease Assignation, 1983–2001 112 ix 6.3 Years Elapsed Between Lease Assignation and First Oil for Successful Deepwater Projects in the GOM Federal OCS, 1983–1993 112 6.4 Location of GOM Deep Sea Drilling Programme Holes that Encountered Hydrocarbon Shows 114 6.5 Progression of Offshore Exploratory and Production Drilling (Worldwide and USA), 1947–2004 115 6.6 Shell Annual Deepwater Lease Acquisitions in the GOM Federal OCS, 1983–2003 119 6.7 Production Profiles of Early Deepwater Development Projects in the GOM Federal OCS, 1979–2004 120 6.8 Distribution of Winning Bids for GOM Deepwater Acreage, 1983–1993 122 6.9 Distribution of Winning Bids for GOM Deepwater Acreage, 1994–2004 123 6.10 Creaming Curves for GOM Shallow Water and Deepwater Sub-provinces, as of 2002 126 6.11 Creaming Curves for Selected Deepwater Provinces, up to 2003 127 7.1 GOM Federal OCS Output of Condensates and Natural Gas Liquids, 1947–2004 131 7.2 Production Profile of Mensa Natural Gas Development, 1997–2004 132 7.3 Production Profile of Mica Natural Gas Development, 2001–2004 132 7.4 Production Profile of the Cognac Development, 1979–2004 133 7.5 Production Profile of the Bullwinkle Development, 1989–2004 134 7.6 Production Profile of the Mars Development, 1996–2019 135 7.7 Forecast Production Profile of the Thunder Horse/ Thunder Horse North Development, 2005–2020 135 7.8 Production Profile of the Brutus Development, 2001–2015 136 7.9 Production Profile of
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2016
    AnnualGeneral Report Manager’s and Accounts Report 2016 SIGTTO Society for International Gas Tanker and Terminal Operators Ltd Continually promoting best practice in the liquefied gas shipping and terminal industries for 38 years SIGTTO Annual Report Annual SIGTTO and Accounts 2016 1 SIGTTO Purpose SIGTTO has been organised to encourage the safe and responsible operation of liquefied gas tankers and marine terminals handling liquefied gas; to develop advice and guidance for best industrial practice among its members; and to promote criteria for best practice to all who have responsibilities for, or interest in, the safety of gas tankers and terminals. SIGTTO 2020 Vision (Where the Society wishes to see itself in 2020, according to its Strategic Plan) SIGTTO will be recognised as the foremost gas shipping and terminal industry body - a modern centre of industry expertise - with all appropriate resources available to address industry technical and operational issues. It will be the industry advocate for the proactive enhancement of safe and sustainable international gas terminal and shipping operations through the provision of consistent guidelines and measures. Contents SIGTTO Annual Report 2016 Contents 5 President’s report 15 SIGTTO Secretariat 30 Hot off the presses David Furnival presents The Society’s Secretariat Review of latest industry an overview of outstanding office staff best practice publications progress in a notable year from SIGTTO 16 SIGTTO committees 7 General Manager’s report and subcommittees 30 Publications list Andrew
    [Show full text]
  • Methanizing the Mediterranean Area. TRIESTE & ROME 10-11/06/2015
    Methanizing the Mediterranean Area. TRIESTE & ROME 10-11/06/2015 FROM NORTH AND BALTIC SEA TO THE MEDITERRANEAN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LNG CHAIN Tord johnsson Area, Business development manager, Europe & Africa Oil & Gas Business WÄRTSILÄ POWER PLANTS Introduction – Wärtsilä Corporation 19,000 professionals Solutions for Marine / Offshore Power Generation Net sales by business 2014 Ship Power Services 36% Efficiency Flexibility Environmental 40% solutions • Listed in Helsinki LEADER IN LEADER • 4.8 billion € turnover Power Plants • Solid financial standing 24% 4 © Wärtsilä 10 June 2015 Tord Johnsson Market Drivers • EU is driving the development of LNG infrastucture out of two reasons o Enviromental and the EU clean fuel strategy mainly related to the transport sector both at sea and at land with stricter emission legislation. ° First SECA area that went into force 1 January 2015 was the Baltic Sea and for part of North Sea with Mediterranean and remaining part of North Sea to follow in 2020 with the aim to have LNG bunkering facitilties in 139 ports. ° Blue Corridor with LNG truck filling stations each 400 km and CNG car filling stations each 150 km . o Security of Supply, with the largely dependance on Russia for EU’s natural gas imports, EU wants to diversify its natural gas imports by both promote new pipeline like TAP and TANAP as well as increase the number of LNG receiving terminals. ° The recent decision for cancellation of the Russia’s South Stream pipeline project has reiterated calls for the rapid and structured development of an energy union within EU, which will have an impact on the LNG imports and purchasing developments.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 8 - Mohorovičić’S Inversion: the Discovery of the Crust-Mantle Boundary A.K.A
    LECTURE 8 - Mohorovičić’s inversion: the discovery of the crust-mantle boundary a.k.a. “Moho” Hrvoje Tkalčić "Andrija Mohorovičić" by a surrealistic painter, Carlo Billich *** N.B. The material presented in these lectures is from the principal textbooks, other books on similar subject, the research and lectures of my colleagues from various universities around the world, my own research, and finally, numerous web sites. I am grateful for the material I used in this particular lecture to D. Skoko, M.Herak, and A. Mohorovičić himself, who was a founder of the Geophysical Institute of the University of Zagreb, at which I studied as an undergraduate student.*** Seismic “phases” and their nomenclature Construction of travel time curves (hodochrones) istance d Epicentral Time Observed and theoretical travel time curves Kennett et al., 1991 1909 Earthquake and the Mohorovičić’s assumption Mohorovičić’s method Mohorovičić’s method Mohorovičić’s method The depth of the discontinuity Voilà! Andrija Mohorovičić 1910 The discontinuity in seismic wave speeds Somewhat arbitrary v alues on this scheme, but generally OK Abrupt change in the composition and density of rocks results in a sharp change in seismic wave speeds The depth of Moho (crustal thickness) Moho in popular culture . The Mohorovičić Discontinuity is mentioned in one particular computer game, an RTS called Total Annihilation. Players can build a "Moho Mine" in order to mine metal at or close to the Mohorovičić Discontinuity. Due to the size of the structure, the public being unfamiliar with the Mohorovičić Discontinuity, and an expansion structure called the "Moho Metal-Maker", "Moho" is misinterpreted as meaning "big.” .
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    Safety30 Speaker Bios Matt Abraham HSE Director, Oil & Gas UK No bio Rebecca Allison Asset Integrity Solutions Centre Manager, The Oil & Gas Technology Centre Rebecca is a highly driven and motivated Senior Manager with more than 20 years of experience in the oil and gas sector working for various service companies such as Lloyd’s Register, Aker Solutions and Stork. As manager of the Asset Integrity Solution Centre within the Oil & Gas Technology Centre, Rebecca is responsible for leading the Asset Integrity team to identify and appraise the relevance, readiness and accessibility of existing technology in the market place to meet mature basin asset integrity challenges. She is specifically charged with identifying specific technology gaps that remain in asset integrity through designing and delivering programmes to resolve these gaps. Mario Alonso Digital Solutions Product Leader - Subsea Production Systems & Service, Baker Hughes, a GE Company Mario is a digital solutions product leader at Baker Hugues, a GE Business. He is responsible for the digital solutions portfolio within Subsea Production Systems and Services, and has been focused on development of digital analytics applications for the last 13+ years. Mario has an engineering background and hold a PhD in Multi-Phase Fluid Dynamics. He is a chartered engineer and member of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Zev Arnold Executive, Accenture Zev is an executive in Accenture's Industry X.0 Practice and a real-time applications practitioner. In his career, he has helped his clients make improvements in operational performance and integrity, and helped secure their license to operate. He has specialized in real-time infrastructure and analytics, working with the Integrated Operations initiatives of several multinational oil and gas operating companies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mohole : a Crustal Journey and Mantle Quest
    The MoHole : a Crustal Journey and Mantle Quest BENOÎT ILDEFONSE CNRS, GÉOSCIENCES MONTPELLIER [email protected] Mission Moho co-proponents Natsue Abe, Peter Kelemen, Hidenori Kumagai, Damon Teagle, Doug Wilson, Gary Acton, Jeff Alt, Wolfgang Bach, Neil Banerjee, Mathilde Cannat, Rick Carlson, David Christie, Rosalind Coggon, Laurence Coogan, Robert Detrick, Henry Dick, Jeffrey Gee, Kathryn Gillis, Alistair Harding, Jeff Karson, Shuichi Kodaira, Juergen Koepke, John Maclennan, Jinichiro Maeda, Chris MacLeod, Jay Miller, Sumio Miyashita, Jim Natland, Toshio Nozaka, Mladen Nedimovic, Yasuhiko Ohara, Kyoko Okino, Philippe Pezard, Eiichi Takazawa, Takeshi Tsuji, Susumu Umino Co-authors of MoHole workshop report Natsue Abe, Yoshio Isozaki, Donna Blackman, Pablo Canales, Shuichi Kodaira, Greg Myers, Kentaro Nakamura, Mladen Nedimovic, Ali Skinner, Eiichi Takazawa, Damon Teagle, Masako Tominaga, Susumu Umino, Doug Wilson, Masaoki Yamao April 1958, meeting in the Great Hall of the NAS : “What good will it do to get a single sample of the mantle?...” “Perhaps it is true that we won't find out as much about the earth’s interior from one hole as we hope. To those who raise that objection I say, If there is not a first hole, there cannot be a second or a tenth or a hundredth hole. We must make a beginning.” Harry Hess Project “Mohole” 1957-1966 Life, April 14, 1961 Offshore Guadalupe Island March-April 1961 CUSS 1 Dynamic positioning ~ 3500 mbsl 5 holes Max depth 183 m, miocene sediments & ~ 14 m of basalt 40 years of planning on deep drilling of the ocean lithosphere Oceanic basement drilling 1968 - 2005 basalt (45 holes > 50 m) gabbro & serpentinite (37 holes > 10 m) Ildefonse et al., 2007 Not enough !! ~3% of DSDP/ODP/IODP cumulated depth No continuous section of ocean crust ! Scientific planning 2006-2010 • Mission Moho Workshop Formation and Evolution of Oceanic Lithosphere Portland, Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Decommissioning Activity and Infrastructure Availability in the UKCS
    NORTH SEA STUDY OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 122 Prospective Decommissioning Activity and Infrastructure Availability in the UKCS Professor Alexander G. Kemp and Linda Stephen October, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ISSN 0143-022X NORTH SEA ECONOMICS Research in North Sea Economics has been conducted in the Economics Department since 1973. The present and likely future effects of oil and gas developments on the Scottish economy formed the subject of a long term study undertaken for the Scottish Office. The final report of this study, The Economic Impact of North Sea Oil on Scotland, was published by HMSO in 1978. In more recent years further work has been done on the impact of oil on local economies and on the barriers to entry and characteristics of the supply companies in the offshore oil industry. The second and longer lasting theme of research has been an analysis of licensing and fiscal regimes applied to petroleum exploitation. Work in this field was initially financed by a major firm of accountants, by British Petroleum, and subsequently by the Shell Grants Committee. Much of this work has involved analysis of fiscal systems in other oil producing countries including Australia, Canada, the United States, Indonesia, Egypt, Nigeria and Malaysia. Because of the continuing interest in the UK fiscal system many papers have been produced on the effects of this regime. From 1985 to 1987 the Economic and Social Science Research Council financed research on the relationship between oil companies and Governments in the UK, Norway, Denmark and The Netherlands. A main part of this work involved the construction of Monte Carlo simulation models which have been employed to measure the extents to which fiscal systems share in exploration and development risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Energy, Exploration and Production Asset Book 2014
    Exploration and Production Asset Book 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Our story so far 5 Our business outlook 7 Regional overview 9 UK & the Netherlands 11 Norway 25 Canada 33 Trinidad and Tobago 41 Glossary 46 Centrica Energy Asset book 2014 Introduction Centrica Energy Asset book 2014 Introduction 3 4 Our E&P story started in the East Irish Sea with the discovery of the Morecambe Bay gas field in 1974 by John Bains. As Centrica Energy’s sole asset at the time of the company’s birth in 1997, the Morecambe operation was the springboard for our growth into what is Safety now an E&P business producing 230mboe/d across five countries on both sides of the Atlantic. Over 1,700 of my colleagues work every day with the united purpose to make our business aspirations a reality, delivering energy not just for today but well into the future. We are united by a common desire to create a culture across Centrica Energy (CE) which can be summed up in five words; safety, high performance and pioneering High performance spirit. We call this the CE Way and it guides everything we do, ensuring that we do our jobs safely, or not at all, we demand the best from one another and we look for better ways to achieve our goals. The E&P world is one where you can ill afford to stand still if you want to maintain production, never mind grow it. We are working in a challenging environment where, across the globe, industry players see increasing costs from the supply chain, lower productivity in maturing basins Pioneering spirit and less than adequate capital project performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport, 2005
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Geneva REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT, 2005 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2005 ii Review of Maritime Transport, 2005 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * * * Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, with reference to the document number (see below). A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2005 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.05.II.D.14 ISBN 92-1-112674-6 ISSN 0566-7682 Contents, Introduction and Summary iii CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Cng Carriers Applied to Remote Marginal Gas Field Developments
    CNG CARRIERS APPLIED TO REMOTE MARGINAL GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENTS C. N. White, EnerSea Transport LLC, US S. McClure, Alan C. McClure Associates Inc., US S. J. Rowe, BMT Fluid Mechanics Limited, UK Prof. D. A. Friis, Centre for Marine CNG, Memorial University of Newfoundland, NL, Canada SUMMARY This paper examines applications of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) carriers, using event-domain simulations to assess transportation system operating efficiency. This new gas transport system requires very limited investment in infrastructure dedicated to a specific field. As confirmed in a recent study for a leading US energy company, it is even possible that gas wells for certain reservoirs can flow directly onto the ship and into storage without any significant in- field investment beyond traditional subsea tie-back facilities. That study investigated the feasibility of developing an ultra-deep water gas field by producing directly from subsea wells into a pair of Gas Production/Storage Shuttles (GPSS™) that alternate between producing and transporting duties. These shuttles are designed using EnerSea Transport’s patented technology for volume-optimized transport and storage of CNG (VOTRANS™). CNG marine transport allows emerging, energy-hungry markets around the globe to access gas reserves that would otherwise continue to remain stranded. The scalable CNG solution may also help energy operators to globally reduce the amount of energy being flared or wasted. As compared to other solutions for de-stranding of gas reserves (LNG & GTL technologies), the shipping of CNG offers a solution that significantly limits the wastage of gas resources that are needed in the emerging markets and the amount of captive investment required of operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Mediterranean: Addressing Gas Export Challenges
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN: ADDRESSING GAS EXPORT CHALLENGES The Eastern Mediterranean is a complex environment for gas producers and countries aspiring to become gas exporters in the next few years. Not only do they have to deal with the usual industry challenges, but they also have to manage with an even tougher factor: geopolitics. A recent report commissioned by the Norwegian government highlights such difficulties by indicating, among other things, that Israel constitutes a high risk for exporting gas. The report anticipates the country – which boasts the most developed oil and gas sector and the largest proven reserves among newcomers in the Eastern Mediterranean – will have more difficulty exporting its excess gas than, say, Brazil, Angola, or Mozambique. Cyprus faces similar difficulties. Its plans to build an LNG plant in Vasilikos are in doubt since such a plant would require more gas than what has been discovered so far in Aphrodite to justify the construction of this multi-billion dollar facility, although ongoing exploration in the Island’s exclusive economic zone could result in the discovery of new gas fields. On paper, the most reasonable way to monetize Aphrodite’s (and part of Leviathan’s) gas is through a pipeline to Turkey, a large market seeking to diversify its gas supplies. But this option is not feasible unless significant progress is made in the negotiations between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. A pipeline to Greece is not an easy feat and carries an exorbitant price tag. Egypt, with its large market and two underused LNG plants in Damietta and Idku could be an option, either to supply the local market or to liquefy the gas and export it to world markets.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENTN=== of ENERGY Nova Scotia EXPORT MARKET ANALYSIS
    NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENTN=== OF ENERGY Nova Scotia EXPORT MARKET ANALYSIS MARCH 2017 Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Best Prospects Charts…….………………………………………………………………………………….…...……………………………………..6 Angola Country Profile .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Australia Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Brazil Country Profile ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Canada Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................... 39 China Country Profile ....................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Denmark Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................ 67 Kazakhstan Country Profile ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]