DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-CA-N020-2018-0011-EA Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA Hazard Tree Removal Project May 2018 Craig Drake Applegate Field Office Manager 708 W. 12th Street Alturas, CA 96101 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Applegate Field Office Phone: (530) 233-4666 Fax: (530) 233-5696 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Proposed Action Location ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues ................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Plan Compliance and Tiering .................................................................................................................................. 3 Special Designations – Areas of Critical Environmental Concern: ............................................................................... 4 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Alternative 1 – Proposed Action .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Alternative 2 – No Action ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Discussion .......................................................................... 5 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ................... 6 3.1 General Description ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Environmental Effects ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Resource Issues........................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.5 Resources Eliminated from further analysis ............................................................................................................ 7 3.6 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.7 Fuels and Fire Management ................................................................................................................................... 11 3.8 Invasive, non-native Species.................................................................................................................................. 13 3.9 Soils ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.10 Wilderness Study Areas/Wilderness Characteristics ........................................................................................... 16 4. AGENCIES, TRIBES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS CONSULTED ............................................. 17 5. DOCUMENT PREPARATION .............................................................................................................................. 18 6. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The Applegate Field Office received a notification regarding standing dead trees from a private landowner that borders the eastern edge of the Timbered Crater Area of Critical Environmental Concern and Wilderness Study Area (ACEC/WSA) during the summer of 2017. The landowner has a private residence that is immediately adjacent to the eastern boundary of the WSA and is accessed from Pine Shadows Road near Day, California. The landowner expressed concern that deceased trees could eventually fall on to his property and cause damage to his house and surrounding outbuildings. The trees died within the past three years (2014-2016) as a result of beetle activity in the area, principally mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and drought. In response, the Applegate Field Office performed a hazard tree assessment of the area on December 27, 2017. Approximately eighteen trees where assessed, of which, six were identified as posing an immediate threat to the residence and public safety. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Applegate Field Office (AGFO) hired a professional timber faller to cut sixteen trees adjacent to a private residence on February 1, 2018. The project area is approximately 1.5 acres in size and is located within the Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA which is located at the junction of Shasta, Siskiyou, and Modoc Counties in northeastern California (Figure 1.1). The WSA contains 18,095 acres of public land managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Figure 1.1: The photo on the left shows the identified hazard trees (indicated with blue flagging) along the boundary between the private residence and the Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA and the photo on the right shows the identified hazard trees following falling operations. 1.2 Proposed Action Location The proposed project is located in northeastern Shasta County, California near the town of Day, California (Figure 1.2). The legal description is as follows: Township 39N, Range 5E, Section 27; Mount Diablo Base Meridian. Figure 1.2: Location of the Timbered Crater Hazard Tree Removal project in northeastern Shasta County, California. 1.3 Purpose and Need The purpose of this action is decrease fuel loading and visual impacts of downed trees immediately adjacent to the boundary between the Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA and an adjacent private residence. The action is necessary to respond to a request from a private landowner regarding dead trees on public land that were threatening his private property. Once the trees were cut, the fallen trees now create a potential hazardous fuels situation adjacent to the private lands and constitute an incompatible action within the WSA. 1.3.1 Decision to be Made The BLM would decide on whether or not to treat hazardous fuels and visual impacts following falling operations within the Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA. Page 2 DOI-BLM-CA-N020-2018-0011-EA 1.4 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues 1.4.1 Internal Scoping The BLM Applegate Field Office conducted internal scoping with an interdisciplinary team of specialists on January 4, 2018. 1.4.2 External Scoping An initial scoping letter was sent out on January 24, 2018 in anticipation of this EA. Scoping letters were sent to all identified interested parties within the vicinity of the project area. The interested parties included: local tribes, landowners, wilderness groups, and state and federal agencies. In addition, a letter was sent to the livestock grazing permittee that utilizes the Hot Springs Allotment. Federally recognized tribes were consulted with during the project planning process and the California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) was consulted with during the project planning process as well. No comments were received during the initial scoping period and no concerns were expressed by the tribes during the formal consultation process. 1.4.3 Issues Identified through Internal and External Scoping An “issue” is a point of disagreement, debate, or dispute with the proposed action based on some anticipated environmental effect. An issue has a cause and effect relationship with the proposed action or alternatives. It is within the scope of the analysis, has not been decided by law, regulation, or previous decision, and is amendable to scientific analysis rather than conjecture. Identification of issues for this assessment was accomplished by considering the resources that could be affected by implementation of one of the alternatives. 1.4.3.1 Issues Selected For Detailed Analysis What are the impacts to the wilderness values such as solitude and naturalness? What are the impacts of prescribed fire activities (i.e. pile burning) on local and regional air quality? What are the impacts of pile burning on noxious weed populations within the project area? What are the impacts of pile burning on soils within the project area? What are the potential impacts of fuel loading and subsequently fire behavior within the project area? 1.5 Plan Compliance and Tiering The Timbered Crater ACEC/WSA Hazard Tree Removal Project EA references and is tiered to the 2008 AFO RMP FEIS. 2008 Alturas Field Office Resource Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (AFO RMP FEIS): Fuels Management: Section 2.6.3 (2-29): Fuel treatment projects would specifically target juniper-invaded sagebrush-steppe, important wildlife habitats, the WUI,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1151CIRC.Pdf
    CIRCULAR 153 MAY 1967 OBSERVATIONS on SPECIES of CYPRESS INDIGENOUS to the UNITED STATES Agricultural Experiment Station AUBURN UNIVERSIT Y E. V. Smith, Director Auburn, Alabama CONTENTS Page SPECIES AND VARIETIES OF CUPRESSUS STUDIED 4 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION-- 4 CONE COLLECTION 5 Cupressus arizonica var. arizonica (Arizona Cypress) 7 Cupressus arizonica var. glabra (Smooth Arizona Cypress) 11 Cupressus guadalupensis (Tecate Cypress) 11 Cupressus arizonicavar. stephensonii (Cuyamaca Cypress) 11 Cupressus sargentii (Sargent Cypress) 12 Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana (Gowen Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana (Santa Cruz Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana var. pygmaca (Mendocino Cypress) 12 Cupressus bakeri (Siskiyou Cypress) 13 Cupressus bakeri (Modoc Cypress) 13 Cupressus macnabiana (McNab Cypress) 13 Cupressus arizonica var. nevadensis (Piute Cypress) 13 GENERAL COMMENTS ON GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION ---------- 13 COMMENTS ON STUDYING CYPRESSES 19 FIRST PRINTING 3M, MAY 1967 OBSERVATIONS on SPECIES of CYPRESS INDIGENOUS to the UNITED STATES CLAYTON E. POSEY* and JAMES F. GOGGANS Department of Forestry THERE HAS BEEN considerable interest in growing Cupressus (cypress) in the Southeast for several years. The Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, was the first institution in the Southeast to initiate work on the cy- presses in 1937, and since that time many states have introduced Cupressus in hope of finding a species suitable for Christmas tree production. In most cases seed for trial plantings were obtained from commercial dealers without reference to seed source or form of parent tree. Many plantings yielded a high proportion of columnar-shaped trees not suitable for the Christmas tree market. It is probable that seed used in Alabama and other Southeastern States came from only a few trees of a given geo- graphic source.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Cypress a Rare Oregon Native
    THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2012 • HOME & GARDEN, DAILY COURIER, Grants Pass, Oregon 15 Baker cypress a rare Oregon native If you are on a quest to find Oregon’s atively slow growing, at about a foot a and shiny, round cones contribute to its rarest tree the last place you would think year. Dan says the tree is drought tolerant, landscape value, as well. It is easy to grow to look is in a backyard on Prospect and it only needs water the first couple of in cultivation.” HG Avenue in Grants Pass but there are a pair years after it’s planted, but good drainage — Rachel Winters is a Rogue Community of Baker cypress (Cupressus bakeri) thriv- “is a must.” College horticulture instructor who owns ing in the garden of Gwen and Dick Here’s Plant Oregon’s description of Siskiyou Gardens, a small Grants Pass nurs- Adams. The trees were grown from seed by Baker cypress from their website: ery specializing in bonsai, unusual trees and their good friend Dave Russell, who is “Indigenous to the Siskiyou Mountains shrubs. She can be reached at 541-476-6243 retired from the Bureau of Land of southern Oregon and northern or at [email protected]. BAKER CYPRESS MALE CONELETS Management, where he served as manager California, the Baker Cypress is listed as of the Sprague Seed rare and endangered. We are proud to offer Orchard. plants we have raised from seed and from Free Does Your “D-I-Y Project” “I collected seed in cuttings. It grows to as much as 65 feet in Estimates the early ‘80s from the wild, but it will take many years for a Need Some Professional Help? Flounce Rock and cultivated specimen to reach anywhere Miller Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Morphogenesis of the Seed Cones of the Cupressaceae - Part II Cupressoideae
    1 2 Bull. CCP 4 (2): 51-78. (10.2015) A. Jagel & V.M. Dörken Morphology and morphogenesis of the seed cones of the Cupressaceae - part II Cupressoideae Summary The cone morphology of the Cupressoideae genera Calocedrus, Thuja, Thujopsis, Chamaecyparis, Fokienia, Platycladus, Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Cupressus and Juniperus are presented in young stages, at pollination time as well as at maturity. Typical cone diagrams were drawn for each genus. In contrast to the taxodiaceous Cupressaceae, in Cupressoideae outgrowths of the seed-scale do not exist; the seed scale is completely reduced to the ovules, inserted in the axil of the cone scale. The cone scale represents the bract scale and is not a bract- /seed scale complex as is often postulated. Especially within the strongly derived groups of the Cupressoideae an increased number of ovules and the appearance of more than one row of ovules occurs. The ovules in a row develop centripetally. Each row represents one of ascending accessory shoots. Within a cone the ovules develop from proximal to distal. Within the Cupressoideae a distinct tendency can be observed shifting the fertile zone in distal parts of the cone by reducing sterile elements. In some of the most derived taxa the ovules are no longer (only) inserted axillary, but (additionally) terminal at the end of the cone axis or they alternate to the terminal cone scales (Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Juniperus). Such non-axillary ovules could be regarded as derived from axillary ones (Microbiota) or they develop directly from the apical meristem and represent elements of a terminal short-shoot (Tetraclinis, Juniperus).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Street Tree and Shrub List, from Public Works Standards
    STREET TREE LIST Excerpt from Public Works Standards Section 5 Street Design Standards (Current as of October 1, 2019) Street Trees Planter Space (ft) Botanic Name Common Name 3- 4- 6- DT Watering Notes 3.9 5.9 8+ Acer circinatum Vine maple X Regular Utility friendly, native, fall color Acer palmatum Japanese maple X Regular Mature height 15' cultivars minimum Carpinus betulus Frans Fontain X X Regular Columnar tree Frans Fontaine Hornbeam Carpinus japonicus Japanese X Regular Tolerates full sun and hornbeam heavy shade Cercis canadensis Eastern redbud X Regular Avoid very hot, dry cultivars areas Cercis occidentalis * Western redbud * X Occasional Purple flowers emerge before leaves Chamaecyparis Hinoki cypress X Regular Evergreen, mature obtusa cultivars height 15' minimum Chamaecyparis Sawara cypress X Occasional Evergreen, mature pisifera cultivars height 15' minimum Chionanthus White fringetree X Regular Utility friendly, virginicus fragrant white flowers Eucommia ulmoides Emerald Point o X Regular Columnar tree 'Empozam' hardy rubber tree Lagerstroemia spp. Crepe myrtle X Regular Vase-shaped, large flowers Laurus nobilis * Bay laurel * X X Summer dry Evergreen, slow growing, fragrant leaves Maakia amurensis Amur maakia X X Regular Utility friendly Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia o X Regular Evergreen, slow 'Little Gem' growing, compact form Nyssa sinensis Chinese tupelo o X Occasional Fall color, good for difficult sites Pistacia chinensis Chinese pistache X X Regular Fall color, drought tolerant Quercus dumosa * Scrub oak * X Summer
    [Show full text]
  • The Baker's Cypress
    AMERICAN CONIFER SOCIETY coniferVOLUME 33, NUMBER 2 | SPRING 2016 QUARTERLY ENCOUNTERS WITH The Baker’s Cypress PAGE 18 SAVE THE DATE • 2016 SOUTHEAST REGION MEETING • AUGUST 26–28 • WAYNESBORO, VA TABLE O F CONTENTS 16 05 18 12 Welcome to the new ConiferQuarterly ACS Seed Exchange and How I Became By Ron Elardo 04 16 a Coniferite By Jim Brackman What Do Conifer Enthusiasts Need to Encounters with The Baker’s Cypress Know About Mycorrhizae? 05 18 By David Pilz By Bert Cregg, Ph.D. Comments on Conifers for Open Forum: Southeast Region ACS Part 1 09 22 Reference Gardens By Bob Fincham 2016 Southeast Region Meeting ACS Directorate By Jeff Harvey 12 23 Shady Characters: Conifers and Plants Made For Shade 14 By Rich and Susan Eyre Spring 2016 Volume 33, Number 2 ConiferQuarterly (ISSN 8755-0490) is published quarterly by the American Conifer Society. The Society is a non- Conifer profit organization incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is tax exempt under Quarterly section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Service Code. You are invited to join our Society. Please address Editor membership and other inquiries to the American Conifer Ronald J. Elardo Society National Office, PO Box 1583, Minneapolis, MN 55311, [email protected]. Membership: US & Canada $38, International $58 (indiv.), $30 (institutional), $50 Technical Editors (sustaining), $100 (corporate business) and $130 (patron). Steven Courtney If you are moving, please notify the National Office 4 weeks Robert Fincham in advance. Ethan Johnson David Olszyk All editorial and advertising matters should be sent to: Ron Elardo, 5749 Hunter Ct., Adrian, MI 49221-2471, (517) 902-7230 or email [email protected] Advisory Committee Tom Neff, Committee Chair Copyright © 2016, American Conifer Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus Forbesii) Management Plan
    Final Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus forbesii) Management Plan Prepared by: Susana Rodriguez-Buritica & Katharine Suding University of California, Berkeley Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management Berkeley, CA 94720 & Kristine Preston Nature Reserve of Orange County 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Contract # P0750005 01 & Nature Reserve of Orange County May 17, 2010 Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Orange County’s Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) was established in 1996 to conserve sensitive plant and animal species on approximately 37,000 acres. Tecate cypress (Cupressus forbesii) is a rare endemic species restricted to several locations in southern California and northern Baja California. The northern most population of Tecate cypress occurs in the Santa Ana Mountains within the NCCP/HCP Central Reserve and receives regulatory coverage under the Plan. This population is threatened by too frequent wildfire. The Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) oversees monitoring and management of species within the NCCP/HCP and formed the Tecate Cypress Management Committee (TCMC) to develop a management plan for this species. The committee is composed of land owners, land managers and regulatory agencies with an interest in conserving Tecate cypress in the NCCP/HCP. This management plan was developed by NROC based upon the work of researchers from UC Berkeley and input from the TCMC. The objectives of this management plan included determining the current distribution and demographic structure of the Santa Ana Mountains Tecate cypress population and using this data in ecological models to assess threats to persistence and to identify restoration sites for enhancing the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 the Following Pages Outline Phasing Recommendations for The
    Kruckeberg Botanic Garden Master Site Plan PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION he following pages outline phasing recommendations for the KruckebergT Botanic Garden that seem desirable to address the needs, vision, and requirements of a private garden’s evolution into the publc domain. With the transfer of this property from a private residence to a commercial public entity, new sets of codes, restrictions, and opportunities come into play. These deal with public safety, health, and well-being and ensure that equal opportunities are afforded to all. Within a limited budget, Phase 1 responds to these immediate needs by providing on-site public parking to reduce impacts to the surrounding residential community, adding much needed public restrooms, and creating a permanent and separate service access road and staff parking area. Phase 2 focuses on siting an interpretive switchback boardwalk trail that connects the upper and lower gardens in an aesthetic ADA-compliant manner. It is also envi- sioned that an ADA-compliant loop path would be routed through the lower garden. While it would be optimal to build the environmental learning center in Phase 2, it is recognized that lack of funding may require deferment to a later phase. Further development of future phases depends on many factors, most importantly securing funding and the commitment of the City, Foundation, and public to sup- port and encourage new work to proceed. In the end, this alone will determine how quickly Garden projects are completed and the Garden vision, as outlined in this report, is realized. This is a modest plan as represented by the development costs associated with each phase in 2010 dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Fire to Endemic Cypress Populations in Northern California
    Restoring fire to endemic cypress populations in northern California Kyle Merriam1 and Erin Rentz2 1USDA Forest Service, Sierra Cascade Province, 159 Lawrence St., Quincy, CA phone: (530) 283-7777, fax: (530) 283-7716, email: [email protected], 2USDA Forest Service, Northern Province, 63822 Highway 96, Happy Camp, CA 96039, phone: (530) 493-1728, fax: (530) 493-1796, email: [email protected], This project was funded by the Joint Fire Science Program JFSP project ID number: 06-2-1-17 Abstract Baker cypress (Hesperocyparis bakeri) and Macnab cypress (Hesperocyparis macnabiana) are rare fire-adapted conifers endemic to California and southern Oregon. These species bear closed (serotinous) cones that depend on fire for seed dispersal and require post-fire conditions, such as bare mineral soil and direct sunlight, to germinate (Vogl et al. 1977). Fire has been successfully excluded from many Baker and Macnab cypress populations for almost a century. Cypress groves at many sites are densely crowded with shade-tolerant species and adult cypresses are dying with almost no evidence of regeneration. The intent of our research was to provide land managers with critical information to manage cypress populations by determining if fire management is necessary to restore cypress populations, and if prescribed burning can successfully promote cypress regeneration. We also investigated factors that affect cypress vigor and canopy seed storage. We collected information on stand density, age, health, cone production, shrub and understory species cover, fuel loading, and environmental conditions at most of the known populations of Baker cypress (11 sites) and at three sites supporting Macnab cypress.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypress Species in Oregon
    Cypress Species in Oregon Frank Callahan PO Box 5531, Central Point, OR 97502 lthough not widely known, four species of cypress are native in southwestern AOregon, a northern extension of the California Floristic Provence. These are Baker cypress (Hesperocyparis bakeri), Mendocino cypress (H. pygmaea), MacNab cypress (H. macnabiana), and Sargent cypress (H. sargentii). (New World cypresses, formerly Cupressus, are currently classified as Hesperocyparis; see sidebar.) I will tell the story of how and where they were discovered and named, what is known about their ecology and management, and speculate on the prospects for their survival. Baker Cypress1 In 1914 Forest Ranger William “Bill” C. Fruit discovered the first cypress found in Oregon on Steve Peak in the Siskiyou Mountains while clearing the route for a phone line to the lookout. Unfortunately, he did not document his discovery Bob Adams standing next to a Baker cypress trunk; note the characteristic flaking bark. Photo by Frank Callahan. with specimens (Matthews 1963). Three years later, on 24 August 1917, Forest Ranger Joseph two botanists from Southern Oregon College (SOC) who concluded L. Mackechnie and Matt W. Gorman, Superintendent of the that they were Baker cypress. This site is the northernmost cypress Forestry Building in Portland, collected voucher specimens from population in North America. Ted Maul, state forest patrol ranger, the site. Dr. Elmer Applegate also collected specimens there on Sam Taylor of Elk Lumber Company and Ed Marshal, US Forest 29 July 1930. Unfortunately, all of the foresters and Applegate Service, measured the Baker cypress at Flounce Rock in 1953; the misidentified these trees as MacNab cypress when in fact the trees were Baker cypress.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List.Xlsx
    Family Latin name Location in garden PINACEAE Abies bracteata (D. Don) Nutt. 10, Yellow Pine W, Californian PINACEAE Abies fabri Craib 236, Asian PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 348, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 355, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 358, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 359, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 360, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies koreana E.H. Wilson 225, Asian PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 706, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 709, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach 235, Asian LAMIACEAE Acanthomintha duttonii (Abrams) Jokerst Location Restricted CACTACEAE Acharagma aguirreanum (Glass & R.A. Foster) Glass 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House FABACEAE Acmispon dendroideus (Greene) Brouillet var. dendroideus 6B, Channel Isld., Californian CRASSULACEAE Adromischus diabolicus Toelken 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. var. cinereus (L.f.) Lem. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Adromischus nanus (N.E. Br.) Poelln. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707B, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 708, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium haworthii (Salm-Dyck) Webb & Berthel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Forest Trees in California. Berkeley, Calif
    PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE P.O. BOX 245, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94701 Experiment Station USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER PSW- 82 /1972 (Reprinted with Supplement, 1976.) Stock No. 001-001-00243-7 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Introduction ...................................... 1 Sources of Information .............................. 4 Limitations of Maps ................................ 6 Plant Communities and Tree Distribution ................. 6 CaliforniaWoodlands ............................. 6 Interior Woodlands ............................... 8 MontaneForests ................................. 8 CoastalForests .................................. 9 RiparianForests ................................. 9 Species Notes ..................................... 10 Summary ........................................ 40 References ....................................... 40 Maps............................................ 48 GeographicLocation of Place Names.................... 109 Index of ScientificandCommon Names.................. 113 Supplement ....................................... 115 The Authors JAMES R. GRIFFIN was until 1967 a plant ecologist on the Station's silvicultural research staff headquartered at Redding, California. Since then he has been Associate Research Ecologist with the University of California's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley, and stationed at Hastings Natural History Reservation,
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Cook and Green Pass, Siskiyou County
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2018 Vascular Plants of Cook and Green Pass, Siskiyou County James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plants of Cook and Green Pass, Siskiyou County" (2018). Botanical Studies. 77. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/77 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF COOK AND GREEN PASS, SISKIYOU COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Third Edition • 1 May 2018 Cook and Green Pass is located near the Oregon border in Siskiyou County Polystichum lemmonii • Lemmon’s or Shasta holly fern (41.942 N, 123.146 W; USGS Kangaroo Mountain Quadrangle). The pass Polystichum lonchitis • northern holly fern itself is at 4816 feet. Seiad Valley is probably the closest community. The Polystichum x scopulinum • western sword fern Klamath National Forest has designated about 700 acres of the region as the Cook and Green Botanical Area in recognition of its floristic richness. Equisetaceae — Horsetail or Scouring-Rush Family Here we find “..
    [Show full text]