Report on Alternatives to Contentious Inputs (WP SOIL)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on Alternatives to Contentious Inputs (WP SOIL) Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 1 Organic-PLUS - grant agreement No [774340] Pathways to phase-out contentious inputs from organic agriculture in Europe Deliverable 5.2: Version 1.1 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL) Versions Version: 1.0 (December 2018) First version Version: 1.2 (31 January 2019) With feedback from all authors. Funding This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No [774340 — Organic-PLUS] 10 2.3 Versioni 2.3.1 Sigillo e logotipo verticale Per una maggiore versatilità è disponibile anche la versione verticale di sigillo e logotipo da utilizzare nel caso non sia possibile l’uso della versione orizzontale. Anche in questo caso la singola parte (A) viene usata per determinare la distanza tra sigillo e logotipo. A 2.3.2 Logotipo orizzontale È possibile utilizzare il solo logotipo nella versione orizzontale qualora la dimensione del sigillo dovesse risultare più piccola delle dimensioni minime consigliate (vedi 2.5.1) o, nel contesto, la riproduzione del sigillo potesse risultare pleonastica e ridondante. Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 2 Project Details: Programme: H2020, SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURITY – RESILIENT AND RESOURCE- EFFICIENT VALUE CHAINS Call topic: SFS-08-2017, (RIA) Organic inputs – contentious inputs in organic farming Project Title: Pathways to phase-out contentious inputs from organic agriculture in Europe Project Acronym: Organic-PLUS Proposal Number: 774340-2 Lead Partner: Coventry University, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience Time Frame: 01/05/2018 – 31/04/2022 Authors: Frank Oudshoorn, Cecilie Kristensen, Anne-Kristin Løes, Rafaela Cáceres, Alev Kir, Ralf Pacenka, Lu- cas Knebl, Przemysław Postawa, Tomasz Stachowiak, Agnieszka Szczypiór, Erica Montemayor, Krystyna Malinska, Sabine Zikeli, Judith Conroy, Francis Rayns, and Ulrich Schmutz Deliverable Details: WP: 5 SOIL Task 5.2: Identification of possible alternatives Lead beneficiary: SEGES Involved Partners: CU, UoH, CUT, L&F, IRTA, MFAL, NORSØK, ATB, FORI. Deadline for delivery: Month 9, 31/01/2019 Date of delivery: 31/1/2019 10 2.3 Versioni 2.3.1 Sigillo e logotipo verticale Per una maggiore versatilità è disponibile anche la versione verticale di sigillo e logotipo da utilizzare nel caso non sia possibile l’uso della versione orizzontale. Anche in questo caso la singola parte (A) viene usata per determinare la distanza tra sigillo e logotipo. A 2.3.2 Logotipo orizzontale È possibile utilizzare il solo logotipo nella versione orizzontale qualora la dimensione del sigillo dovesse risultare più piccola delle dimensioni minime consigliate (vedi 2.5.1) o, nel contesto, la riproduzione del sigillo potesse risultare pleonastica e ridondante. Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. The use of commercial fertilisers and manure ....................................................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction and background ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Summary of fertiliser use ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Alternative fertilisers ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Vegan’ ‘organic’ fertilisers – Definitions & issues with labelling .................................................. 14 2.4.1 Fertilisers used by vegan (organic) farms ............................................................................ 14 2.4.2 Commercial fertilisers - current use of the terms ‘vegan’ and ‘organic’ within the EU legal framework ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.3 Vegan logo............................................................................................................................ 17 2.4.4 Vegan organic standards ...................................................................................................... 17 2.4.5 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.4.6 Going forward ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.1 Management to prevent the use of contentious inputs ...................................................... 20 2.5.2 Anaerobic fermentation of manure or plant materials. ...................................................... 21 2.5.3 Mineral composition ............................................................................................................ 21 2.5.4 Technical problems .............................................................................................................. 22 2.5.5 Economic assessment .......................................................................................................... 22 2.5.6 Environmental assessment .................................................................................................. 23 2.5.7 Ethical aspects ...................................................................................................................... 23 2.6 Literature on alternatives ............................................................................................................. 23 2.7 Annex ............................................................................................................................................ 25 3. Peat alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 26 3.1.1 Peat use in horticulture. ....................................................................................................... 26 3.1.2 History of the use of growing media .................................................................................... 26 3.1.3 Properties of peat ................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.4 Environmental impact of peat ............................................................................................. 27 3.1.5 Regulation ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.2 Alternatives identified in Organic-PLUS Deliverable 5.1 .............................................................. 29 3.3 Alternative raw materials that can replace peat .......................................................................... 29 3.3.1 Main characteristics of key alternative ingredients to peat in growing media ................... 30 3.3.2 Selected literature on alternatives to peat and their environmental impact ...................... 33 3.3.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 37 3.4 Conclusion on alternatives to peat ............................................................................................... 38 3.5 References .................................................................................................................................... 39 4. The use of plastic in organic agriculture with specific reference to soil mulches ................................ 42 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Alternatives identified in Organic-PLUS Deliverable 5.1 .............................................................. 42 4.3 Literature review .......................................................................................................................... 42 4.3.1 Background information on plastics .................................................................................... 42 4.3.2 Plastics for mulching of soil .................................................................................................. 44 4.3.3 Alternatives to fossil-based plastic mulches ........................................................................ 44 4.4 Discussion and conclusions on alternatives to plastic .................................................................. 53 4.5 References .................................................................................................................................... 56 Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 4 1. Introduction This report is based on the structure of deliverable D5.1 of the Organic-PLUS project (Løes et al., 2018), where we studied the input of peat, plastic and fertilisers in 10 European countries participating in the project. Whereas that deliverable
Recommended publications
  • The Valorisation of Sargassum from Beach Inundations
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Golden Tides: Problem or Golden Opportunity? The Valorisation of Sargassum from Beach Inundations John J. Milledge * and Patricia J. Harvey Algae Biotechnology Research Group, School of Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-0208-331-8871 Academic Editor: Magnus Wahlberg Received: 12 August 2016; Accepted: 7 September 2016; Published: 13 September 2016 Abstract: In recent years there have been massive inundations of pelagic Sargassum, known as golden tides, on the beaches of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and West Africa, causing considerable damage to the local economy and environment. Commercial exploration of this biomass for food, fuel, and pharmaceutical products could fund clean-up and offset the economic impact of these golden tides. This paper reviews the potential uses and obstacles for exploitation of pelagic Sargassum. Although Sargassum has considerable potential as a source of biochemicals, feed, food, fertiliser, and fuel, variable and undefined composition together with the possible presence of marine pollutants may make golden tides unsuitable for food, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals and limit their use in feed and fertilisers. Discontinuous and unreliable supply of Sargassum also presents considerable challenges. Low-cost methods of preservation such as solar drying and ensiling may address the problem of discontinuity. The use of processes that can handle a variety of biological and waste feedstocks in addition to Sargassum is a solution to unreliable supply, and anaerobic digestion for the production of biogas is one such process.
    [Show full text]
  • Change in the Raw Materials Base
    P o s i t i o n P a P e r Change in the Raw Materials Base Produced and sponsored by a temporary work group consisting of: Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker e.V. (GDCh) (German Chemical society) Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V. (DeCheMa) (society for Chemical engineering and Biotechnology) Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft für erdöl, erdgas und Kohle e.V. (DGMK) (German society for Petroleum and Coal science and technology) and Verband der Chemischen Industrie e.V. (VCI) (the German Chemical industry association) chaired by Professor em. Dr. Dr. hc. Wilhelm Keim, rWtH aachen University and Professor Dr. Michael röper, BasF se, Ludwigshafen Frankfurt, August 2010 P o s i t i o n P a P e r – C H a n G e i n t H e r a W M a t e r i a L s B a s e DeCheMa – Gesellschaft für Chemische technik und Biotechnologie e.V. theodor-Heuss-allee 25, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, www.dechema.de GDCh – Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker e.V. Varrentrappstraße 40-42, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, www.gdch.de DGMK – Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für erdöl, erdgas und Kohle e.V. Überseering 40, 22297 Hamburg, www.dgmk.de VCI – Verband der Chemischen industrie e.V. Mainzer Landstraße 55, 60329 Frankfurt am Main, www.vci.de 2 P o s i t i o n P a P e r – C H a n G e i n t H e r a W M a t e r i a L s B a s e c o n t e n t s 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakalářská Práce
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV GEOLOGICKÝCH VĚD Bakalářská práce Brno 2016 Simona Kuboušková MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV GEOLOGICKÝCH VĚD Chemické a petrografické složení uhlí Faerských ostrovů Bakalářská práce Simona Kuboušková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Eva Geršlová, Ph.D. Konzultant: doc. RNDr. Lukáš Krmíček, Ph.D. Brno 2016 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Simona Kuboušková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita Ústav geologických věd Název práce: Chemické a petrografické složení uhlí Faerských ostrovů Studijní program: PřF B-GE Geologie Studijní obor: PřF GEOL Geologie Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Eva Geršlová, Ph.D. Akademický rok: 2015/2016 Počet stran: 20 + 10 Klíčová slova: Faerské ostrovy; Složení uhlí; Macerálová analýza; Světelná odraznost; XRF analýza; Obsah rtuti; Těžba uhlí; Depoziční prostředí MDT: ‑032.35; 292.413; 628.2 Bibliographic Entry Author Simona Kuboušková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University Department of Geological Sciences Title of Thesis: Chemical and petrographical composition of the Faroe Islands coals Degree programme: PřF B-GE Geologie Field of Study: PřF GEOL Geologie Supervisor: Mgr. Eva Geršlová, Ph.D. Academic Year: 2015/2016 Number of Pages: 20 + 10 Keywords: Faroe Islands; Coal composition; Maceral analysis; Reflectance; XRF analysis; Mercury content; Coal mining; Depositional environment UDC: ‑032.35; 292.413; 628.2 Abstrakt První kombinovaná petrografická a geochemická studie paleogenního uhlí z Faerských ostrovů zahrnuje jednak určení stupně prouhelnění, jednak stanovení macerálového a prvkového složení. Pro účely bakalářské práce bylo studováno 17 vzorků z mladšího souvrství prestfjall a 1 vzorek ze staršího souvrství beinisvørð. Pro studium prouhelnění byly provedeny chemicko-technologické analýzy a změření světelné odraznosti ulminitu. Všechny vzorky byly dále podrobeny macerálové a prvkové analýze. Ve vybraných reprezentativních vzorcích byly rovněž stanoveny přesné obsahy rtuti.
    [Show full text]
  • Sus Agriculture Final.Qxd
    SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE Second Edition JOHN MASON National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication: Mason, John, 1951– . Sustainable agriculture. 2nd ed. ISBN 0 643 06876 7. 1. Sustainable agriculture. 2. Sustainable development. I. Title. 338.16 Copyright © John Mason 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact Landlinks Press for all permission requests. Published by and available from: Landlinks Press PO Box 1139 Collingwood Vic. 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Freecall: 1800 645 051 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Website: www.landlinks.com Cover design and text design by James Kelly Set in 10.5/13 Minion Printed in Australia by BPA Print Group Front cover photograph courtesy of John Mason Contents Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 1 Different things to different people 3 2Sustainable concepts 9 3 Soils 23 4Water management 49 5 Pest and disease control 77 6Sustainable natural weed control and cultivation 101 7 Management 113 8Managing plants – Crops and pastures 129 9Managing plants – Tree plantings and windbreaks 155 10 Managing animals in a more sustainable way 171 11 Understanding products used in sustainable agriculture 191 Appendix 197 Index 203 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments Research and Editorial Assistants: Iain Harrison, Peter Douglas, Paul Plant, Andrew Penney, Kathy Travis, Naomi Christian, Mark James, Alison Bundock, Rosemary Lawrence, Peter Douglas, Lisa Flower.
    [Show full text]
  • NASAA Certified Organic INPUT DIRECTORY for ORGANIC PRODUCTION and PROCESSING
    NASAA Certified Organic INPUT DIRECTORY for ORGANIC PRODUCTION and PROCESSING VALID UNTIL 31 JANUARY 2019 NASAA Certified Organic PHONE +61 8 7231 7700 EMAIL [email protected] www.nasaacertifiedorganic.com.au NASAA Certified Organic Input Directory for Organic Production and Processing Valid until 31 January 2019 The NASAA Certified Organic Input Directory lists input products assessed as compliant against the NASAA Organic and Biodynamic Standard and the National Standard for Organic and Biodynamic Produce. Products are listed under six different categories: Crop Fertilisers and Soil Amendments Crop Management and Pest Control Livestock Production Materials Edible Minerals Processing and Handling Products Seeds and Plant Materials The inputs included in the 2018 directory* are certified at the time of publishing which is valid until 31 January 2019. As the data may change over 12 months, it is best to also check the NCO website for the latest list of certified input manufacturer and products. Note, if you are certified to additional certification programs such as USDA NOP or JAS, please make sure you obtain a copy of the approval for inputs for the relevant additional standard. USDA NOP Compliance for individual products is listed where applicable in this directory (NOP Compliance Letters are valid for 12 months only). If you have any further questions or feedback, please contact the NCO Office. Certification Team NASAA Certified Organic PO Box 768 Stirling SA 5152 Tel +61 8 7231 7700 Fax +61 8 8370 8381 Email [email protected] www.nasaacertifiedorganic.com.au *While NCO makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of information in this document, we accept no responsibility for information, which may later prove to be misrepresented or inaccurate, or reliance placed on that information by users.
    [Show full text]
  • Rekonstruktion Der Ablagerungsbedingungen Mitteldeutscher Paläogener Und Neogener Kohleflöze Anhand Kohlenpetrographischer Untersuchungen
    Rekonstruktion der Ablagerungsbedingungen mitteldeutscher paläogener und neogener Kohleflöze anhand kohlenpetrographischer Untersuchungen Diplomarbeit zum Erwerb des akademischen Grades des Diplomingenieurs der Studienrichtung Angewandte Geowissenschaften von Jürgen GUSTERHUBER eingereicht am Lehrstuhl für Geologie und Lagerstättenlehre im Department Angewandte Geowissenschaften und Geophysik Montanuniversität Leoben Leoben, November 2007 Ich erkläre eidesstattlich, dass diese Arbeit von mir selbständig und nur unter Benützung der angeführten Literatur durchgeführt wurde. Vorwort Die vorliegende Diplomarbeit wurde am Lehrstuhl für Geologie und Lagerstättenlehre angefertigt. In diesem Zusammenhang gebührt mein Dank Prof. Dr. Reinhard F. Sachsenhofer für die wissenschaftliche Betreuung, die konstruktiven Anmerkungen bei der Durchsicht der Arbeit und das freundliche Klima während der Zusammenarbeit. Ebenso bedanke ich mich bei Dr. Achim Bechtel in erster Linie für die Durchführung der geochemischen Arbeiten, die einen sehr wertvollen Beitrag zum Gelingen dieser Arbeit geliefert haben. In zweiter Linie danke ich ihm und auch Dr. Blumenstengel für die wichtige Koordination der Kontakte zwischen Leoben und Deutschland in Bezug auf Probenlisten und Probenbeschaffung. Besonders herzlich möchte ich mich bei Doris Reischenbacher bedanken, die von den ersten Analysen weg jederzeit ein offenes Ohr für Fragen aller Art hatte und deren Bürotür über die ganze Zeit hinweg bis zu den letzten Korrekturen des Manuskriptes jederzeit offen gestanden hat. In diesem Sinne möchte ich mich auch bei Wilfried Gruber für die angeregten Diskussionen während der Formatierungsarbeiten und bei Lorenz Scheucher für die letzte Korrekturlesung bedanken. Siegfried Schider hat mit seinen vielen guten Tipps erheblich zum guten Gelingen der vielen Anschliffe beigetragen. Der letzte, jedoch besonders große Dank gebührt meiner Familie, die mir durch die bedingungslose und großzügige Unterstützung über die Jahre dieses Studium erst ermöglicht hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Sorption Materials for the Removal of Organic Micropollutants in Domestic Wastewater and Their Potential Infiltration in Groundwater
    Evaluation of sorption materials for the removal of organic micropollutants in domestic wastewater and their potential infiltration in groundwater Master thesis 45hp Ande Rostvall Dept. Chemistry-BMC, Analytical Chemistry Uppsala University (UU) and Dept. Aquatic Science and Assessment Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) 2017 VT Supervisor: Pablo Gago Ferrero Examiner: Christer Elvingson Subject Specialist: Per Sjöberg Abstract The presence of micropollutants (MPs) in the water systems is a growing concern, as these substances may trigger unwanted ecological effects and can be toxic to humans and wildlife. The main sources of MP contamination are the discharges from inadequately treated wastewater. In sparsely populated areas (including large areas of Sweden), where the establishment of conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for the sanitation of wastewater is not feasible, the use of more cost-effective small-scale on-site sewage treatment facilities (OSSFs) is widespread. OSSFs are important sources of MPs and there is a growing concern since these facilities can potentially contaminate groundwater. The present project aims at evaluating the performance of different adsorbents potentially useful for the removal of organic MPs in OSSFs: granulated activated carbon (GAC), Xylit, lignite, sand and GAC followed by Polonite (GAC+P). A set of 83 MPs from different categories including pharmaceuticals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), stimulants and parabens, among others, were used to assess the performance of the selected adsorbents. GAC+P and GAC showed the best removal efficiencies (close to 100% for most of the compounds), showing no statistically significant difference between them. This fact suggests that the role played by Polonite in the removal was not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH WARNING Garden Soils Contain Micro-Organisms That May Be Harmful to Your Health. Always Wear Gloves, Keep Damp While in U
    Manure Soil Conditioners Mulch • 70l Sheep Manure • 30L Mushroom Compost • 30L Water Saving Black Mulch • 70L Composted Cow • 25L Organic Compost • 36L Pinebark Mulch • 40L Chicken Manure • 20kg Bentonite Clay • Compressed Pea Straw Bales • 30L Blended Manure • 25L Charlie Charcoal • Pea hay Bales 900x400x300 • 5L Peat Moss • 45L DSATCO Lupin Mulch Fertilisers • Cocopete Bricks 29*29*11cm • Compressed CCC Eco Bale • NPK – All Purpose 500g or 3kg • 5kg Rocky Rockydust • DSATCO Sugarcane Mulch • Blood n Bone – 2.5kg, 8kg or 15kg • 10kg Gypsum • Black Magic Rose Food • 25L Native Concentrate • Maxicrop Seaweed Fertiliser • 25L Vegetable Concentrate Potting • 2.5kg Fruit & Citrus Food • 2Ltr Eco Lime Hose on • 25L Super Booster Potting Mix • 2.5kg Native Plant Food • 500ml Eco Lime • 30L Premium Potting Mix • Thrive Slow Release Fertiliser 500g • Perlite 5L or 30L Pest Control • 35L DSATCO Piggiepost Lawn Care • 1L White Oil RTU • 25L Blueberry Mix • Easy Wetta Granules 5kg or 10kg • 1L Rose Oil RTU • 5L Seed Raising Mix • 2.5L Easy Wetta Hose-On • 500g Ant Kill Granules • 25L Rose Planting Mix • 5kg Lawn Food • 1Ltr Weed Kill for Lawns RTU • 5Ltr Vermiculite • 10kg Dynamic Lifter Lawn Food • Diatomaceous Earth 2kg or 200g • Yates Lawn Fertiliser 2.5kg Products available for Delivery or Pick up (See below for delivery conditions) Delivery conditions Poo4You will deliver to Perth metro area only – anything outside this area will incur a delivery fee. Minimum 10 bags of sheep/cow manure or $100 worth of combined products (conditions apply on Pea Hay Bales) Please read all instructions and health warnings before applying HEALTH WARNING Garden soils contain micro-organisms that may be harmful to your health.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Organic Micro-Pollutants in Sewage Water - a Structure-Adsorption Relationship Study and Detailed Characterization of Natural Adsorbent
    Reduction of organic micro-pollutants in sewage water - a structure-adsorption relationship study and detailed characterization of natural adsorbent Shiromini Gamage Student: Shiromini Gamage Master Thesis: 30 ECTS Report passed: Supervisor: Patrik Andersson Examiner: Erik Björn Abstract Sewage is water that contains waste in liquid form and as suspension. Micro- pollutants (MPs) in waste water are a major environmental problem facing humanity nowadays. MPs raise concern due to potential toxicological effects on human health and ecosystems at low concentrations. Environmental studies have found that leakage from landfills, waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) and onsite sewage facilities (OSSFs) are major sources for MPs to the aquatic environment. Waste water treatment for removal of MPs is a major challenge because it entails integrated processes in technical as well as economical terms. In this study, 18 different substances were studied including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, surfactants, plasticizers and UV stabilizers. These compounds were selected considering their availability and maximum concentrations in effluent water system, bio-concentration factor, half-life, removal efficiency and the ratio of predicted environmental concentration and predicted no effect concentration (PEC/PNEC). Ozonation, reverse osmosis, electrolysis, ion exchange and adsorption techniques are identified as efficient techniques to remove MPs. Among all those techniques, adsorption has demonstrated efficiency and economic feasibility as waste water treatment. In this study, ten different low cost organic and inorganic adsorbent materials were characterized using various spectroscopic methods including X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DF-FTIRS), scanning electron microscopy together with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM and EDS) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery and Re-Use of Domestic Wastewaters Using Integrated Algal Ponding Systems: a Key Strategy in Sustainable Sanitation
    13 Salinity, Sanitation and Sustainability: A Study in Environmental Biotechnology and Integrated Wastewater Beneficiation in South Africa Salinity, Salinity, Sanitation and Sustainability: Report 13 Recovery and Re-use of Domestic Wastewaters Using Integrated Algal Ponding Systems: A Key Strategy in Sustainable Sanitation SJ Horan, MP Horan, NG Mohale, KJ Whittington-Jones and PD Rose WRC Report No TT 390/09 W a t e r R e s e a r c h C o m m i s s i o n Private Bag X03, Gezina 0031, South Africa 13 Tel: +27 12 330 0340, Fax: +27 12 331 2565 Web: http://www.wrc.org.za Water Research Commission REPORTS in the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION PROJECT SERIES SALINITY, SANITATION and SUSTAINABILITY A Study in Environmental Biotechnology and Integrated Wastewater Beneficiation in South Africa Report 1: Volume 1 - Overview Report 7: Volume 3 - Integrated Algal 7 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 1 of Domestic and Industrial Wastewaters Part 4: System Performance and Tertiary Treatment Operations Report 2: Volume 2 - Integrated Algal Report 8: Volume 3 - Integrated Algal 8 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 2 Ponding Systems and the Treatment of Saline Wastewaters of Domestic and Industrial Wastewaters Part 1: Meso-Saline Wastewaters Part 5: Winery and Distillery Wastewaters The Spirulina Model Report 3: Volume 2 - Integrated Algal Report 9: Volume 4 - The Rhodes BioSURE Process ® 3 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 9 of Saline Wastewaters Part 1: Biodesalination of Mine Drainage Wastewaters Part 2: Hyper-Saline Wastewaters The Dunaliella Model Report
    [Show full text]
  • 1) Innehållsförteckning
    AN ADD-ON FILTER TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE MICROPOLLUTANT REMOVAL AND WATER QUALITY IN ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES Wen Zhang September 2018 TRITA-ABE-DLT-1821 ISBN: 978-91-7729-936-3 Wen Zhang TRITA-ABE-DLT-1821 © Wen Zhang 2018 Phd thesis Division of Water and Environmental Engineering Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering School of Architecture and the Built Environment KTH Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM, Sweden Reference to this publication should be written as: Zhang, W (2018) “An add-on filter technique to improve micropollutant removal and water quality in on-site sewage treatment facilities” TRITA-ABE-DLT-1821 ii An add-on filter technique to improve micropollutant removal and water quality in on-site sewage treatment facilities SUMMARY IN SWEDISH Småskaliga (enskilda) avloppsreningsanläggningar i Sverige och på många håll i världen släpper på grund av ofullständig rening betydande mängder kväve (N) och fosfor (P) till grundvatten och ytvatten. Mikroföroreningar (MP) har också hittats i både ytvatten och grundvatten, vilket indikerar otillräckligt avlägsnande av MP i dessa anläggningar. Det övergripande syftet med denna avhandling var att undersöka olika typer av organiska och oorganiska filtermaterial (sorbent) för att identifiera en lämplig typ eller kombination av typer med hög kapacitet att ta bort en mängd MP från avloppsvatten i småskaliga anläggningar. Samtidigt har konventionella parametrar och ämnen (t ex N, P) i avloppsvattnet studerats för att undersöka om studerade sorbent även samtidigt kan avskilja dessa. Två kolonnförsök i laboratorieskala, följt av ett fältförsök, utfördes för att studera avskiljningen av en uppsättning organiska MPs genom filtrering med organiska och oorganiska sorbent.
    [Show full text]
  • JAS 104 2019 34 to 44
    UHI Research Database pdf download summary Seaweed fertilisation impacts the chemical and isotopic composition of barley Blanz, Magdalena; Ascough, Philippa; Mainland, Ingrid; Martin, Peter; Taggart, Mark A.; Dieterich, Burkart; Wishart, John; Sayle, Kerry L.; Raab, Andrea; Feldmann, Jörg Published in: Journal of Archaeological Science Publication date: 2019 Publisher rights: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The re-use license for this item is: CC BY-NC-ND The Document Version you have downloaded here is: Peer reviewed version The final published version is available direct from the publisher website at: 10.1016/j.jas.2019.02.003 Link to author version on UHI Research Database Citation for published version (APA): Blanz, M., Ascough, P., Mainland, I., Martin, P., Taggart, M. A., Dieterich, B., Wishart, J., Sayle, K. L., Raab, A., & Feldmann, J. (2019). Seaweed fertilisation impacts the chemical and isotopic composition of barley: Implications for analyses of archaeological skeletal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 104, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.02.003 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the UHI Research Database are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights: 1) Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the UHI Research Database for the purpose of private study or research. 2) You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 3) You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the UHI Research Database Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details; we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]