Sus Agriculture Final.Qxd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sus Agriculture Final.Qxd SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE Second Edition JOHN MASON National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication: Mason, John, 1951– . Sustainable agriculture. 2nd ed. ISBN 0 643 06876 7. 1. Sustainable agriculture. 2. Sustainable development. I. Title. 338.16 Copyright © John Mason 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact Landlinks Press for all permission requests. Published by and available from: Landlinks Press PO Box 1139 Collingwood Vic. 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Freecall: 1800 645 051 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Website: www.landlinks.com Cover design and text design by James Kelly Set in 10.5/13 Minion Printed in Australia by BPA Print Group Front cover photograph courtesy of John Mason Contents Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 1 Different things to different people 3 2Sustainable concepts 9 3 Soils 23 4Water management 49 5 Pest and disease control 77 6Sustainable natural weed control and cultivation 101 7 Management 113 8Managing plants – Crops and pastures 129 9Managing plants – Tree plantings and windbreaks 155 10 Managing animals in a more sustainable way 171 11 Understanding products used in sustainable agriculture 191 Appendix 197 Index 203 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments Research and Editorial Assistants: Iain Harrison, Peter Douglas, Paul Plant, Andrew Penney, Kathy Travis, Naomi Christian, Mark James, Alison Bundock, Rosemary Lawrence, Peter Douglas, Lisa Flower. Thanks to the following organisations for information supplied: The National Association for Sustainable Agriculture Australia (NASAA) National Farmers Federation Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture Australian Wiltshire Horn Sheep Breeders Association Australian Finnsheep Breeders Association Llama Association of Australia The Emu Producers Association of Victoria The Australian Ostrich Association Victorian Department Natural Resources and Environment This page intentionally left blank Introduction First there was subsistence farming. Then there was a technological revolution: develop- ments in machinery and chemicals allowed us to clear and cultivate land faster, feed plants and animals quicker (and grow them faster); and kill pests or diseases quickly. These new- found abilities seemed like a godsend to mankind; and throughout the 20th century we used them to their fullest, generally with little regard to any unforseen repercussions. Gradually, time has revealed a variety of problems caused by this modern agricultural development, including chemical residues affecting plant and animal life on land and in the sea, soil degradation in the form of soil structural decline, erosion, salinity, soil acidification, loss of fertility, nutrient loading of waterways, dams and lakes and more. As we move into the 21st century and concern about our environment grows, there is an obvious move towards more sustainable farming. Sustainable farming is, in essence, concerned with anything that affects the sustain- ability of a farm. You cannot keep farming a property indefinitely if there is a degradation of resources (environmental resources, financial resources, equipment, machinery, materi- als, or any other resources). In the short to medium term, the problem of sustainability is overwhelmingly a financial one; but in the long term, environmental sustainability will possibly have a greater impact on the whole industry than anything else. Why be sustainable? If we can’t sustain agricultural production, we will eventually see a decline in production; hence a decline in food and other supplies. There is no escaping the fact that people need agricultural products to survive: for food, clothing, etc. Science may be able to introduce substitutes (eg synthetic fibres) but even the raw materials to make these will generally be limited. As the world’s population increases (or at best remains stable in some places) demand for agricultural produce increases accordingly. Poorly maintained farms produce less in terms of quantity and quality. Profitability decreases mean that surplus money is no 2 Sustainable Agriculture longer available for repair and improvements. Farm land can become contaminated with chemical residues, weeds or vermin. The amount of vegetation produced (ie the biomass) may reduce, resulting in less production of carbon dioxide, and a greater susceptibility to environmental degradation. We have created a world that relies heavily on technology to produce the food needed to sustain its human population. There is a worldwide dilemma. To abandon modern farming methods could result in worldwide famine but to continue current practices will almost certainly result in long-term degradation of farmland and, eventually, the inability to sustain even current human population levels, without even considering future increases in the human population. Who should be concerned? Everyone needs to be concerned about a decline in farm production potential. The farmer, his family, and workers are always affected first. An unsustainable farm is simply not worth persisting with and any farm which heads this way must eventually be abandoned or rede- veloped to become sustainable. This book is about foreseeing and understanding such problems, and addressing them before it is too late. 1 Different things to different people Sustainable farming means different things to different people, however they all share a common concern in preventing the degradation of some aspect of the farm. Some farmers are primarily concerned with degradation of natural resources (eg their land is becoming less productive). Other farmers may be more concerned about degradation of profitability, which could be due to increased labour or material costs, poor planning, or simply chang- ing conditions in the economy. The causes and the solutions to such problems are different in each situation. Sustainable agriculture is a philosophy: it is a system of farming. It empowers the farmer to work with natural processes to conserve resources such as soil and water, whilst minimising waste and environmental impact. At the same time, the ‘agroecosystem’ becomes resilient, self regulating and profitability is maintained. What to do There are many different ideas about how to be more sustainable. Different people promote different concepts with great vigour and enthusiasm and, in most cases, these concepts will contain something valuable. Many are quite similar in approach, often being variations of a similar theme. Each approach will have its application; but because it worked for one person does does not necessarily mean it will work for someone else. Some of these concepts are explained below. Low input farming systems This approach is based on the idea that a major problem is depletion of resources. If a farmer uses fewer resources (eg chemicals, fertiliser, fuel, money, manpower), farm costs will be reduced, there is less chance of damage being caused by waste residues or overworking the land, and the world is less likely to run out of the resources needed to sustain farming. 4 Sustainable Agriculture Regenerative farming systems This seeks to create a system that will regenerate itself after each harvest. Techniques such as composting, green manuring and recycling may be used to return nutrients to the soil after each crop. Permaculture is currently perhaps the ultimate regen- erative system. A permaculture system is a carefully designed landscape which contains a wide range of different plants and animals. This landscape can be small (eg a home garden), or large (eg a farm), and it can be harvested to provide such things as wood (for fuel and building), eggs, fruit, herbs and vegetables, without seriously affecting the environ- mental balance. In essence, it requires little input once established, and continues to produce and remain sustainable. Biodynamic systems This approach concentrates on mobilising biological mechanisms. Organisms such as worms and bacteria in the soil break down organic matter and make nutrients available to pastures or crops. Under the appropriate conditions, nature will help dispose of wastes (eg animal manures), and encourage predators to eliminate pests and weeds. Organic systems Traditionally this involves using natural inputs for fertilisers and pest control, and tech- niques such as composting and crop rotation. In Australia and many other countries, there are schemes which ‘certify’ produce as being organic. These schemes lay down very specific requirements, including products and farming techniques which are permitted, and others which are prohibited. In Australia, you can find out about such schemes through groups such as the Biological Farmers Association (BFA) or the National Association for Sustainable Agriculture (NASAA). See the Appendix for addresses. Conservation farming This is based on the idea of conserving resources that already exist on the farm. It may involve such things as, for example, identifying and retaining the standard and quality of waterways, creek beds, nature strips, slopes. Hydroponics This approach involves separating plant growth from the soil, and taking greater control of the growth of a crop. This increases your ability
Recommended publications
  • The Valorisation of Sargassum from Beach Inundations
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Golden Tides: Problem or Golden Opportunity? The Valorisation of Sargassum from Beach Inundations John J. Milledge * and Patricia J. Harvey Algae Biotechnology Research Group, School of Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-0208-331-8871 Academic Editor: Magnus Wahlberg Received: 12 August 2016; Accepted: 7 September 2016; Published: 13 September 2016 Abstract: In recent years there have been massive inundations of pelagic Sargassum, known as golden tides, on the beaches of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and West Africa, causing considerable damage to the local economy and environment. Commercial exploration of this biomass for food, fuel, and pharmaceutical products could fund clean-up and offset the economic impact of these golden tides. This paper reviews the potential uses and obstacles for exploitation of pelagic Sargassum. Although Sargassum has considerable potential as a source of biochemicals, feed, food, fertiliser, and fuel, variable and undefined composition together with the possible presence of marine pollutants may make golden tides unsuitable for food, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals and limit their use in feed and fertilisers. Discontinuous and unreliable supply of Sargassum also presents considerable challenges. Low-cost methods of preservation such as solar drying and ensiling may address the problem of discontinuity. The use of processes that can handle a variety of biological and waste feedstocks in addition to Sargassum is a solution to unreliable supply, and anaerobic digestion for the production of biogas is one such process.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Wildlife Response to Farm Bill Conservation Practices
    The Wildlife Society Fish and Wildlife Response to Farm Bill Conservation Practices Technical Review 07–1 A Partnership of the Conservation Effects September 2007 Assessment Project Client: The Wildlife Society Project: Farm Bill Date: 9.18.07 Stage: PRINTFinished size: 8.5 x 11 inches Ink: 4/4 LYNN RILEY DESIGN | 410.725.1001 | [email protected] Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service and Farm Service Agency through a partnership with The Wildlife Society in support of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. This document is the second of two literature reviews focused on fish and wildlife and the Farm Bill. It is a conservation practice-oriented companion to the Farm Bill conservation program-focused literature synthesis released in 2005 (Fish and Wildlife Benefits of Farm Bill Conservation Programs: 2000-2005 Update, The Wildlife Society Technical Review 05-2). Client: The Wildlife Society Project: Farm Bill Date: 9.18.07 Stage: PRINTFinished size: 8.5 x 11 inches Ink: 4/4 LYNN RILEY DESIGN | 410.725.1001 | [email protected] The Wildlife Society Fish and Wildlife Response to Farm Bill Conservation Practices Technical Review 07-1 September 2007 Edited by Jonathan B. Haufler Ecosystem Management Research Institute Kathryn L. Boyer Amy C. Ganguli Scott S. Knight USDA NRCS West National Technology Ecosystem Management Research USDA – ARS National Sedimentation Support Center Institute Laboratory 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1000 PO Box 717 PO Box 1157 Portland, OR 97232 Seeley Lake, MT 59868 Oxford, MS 38655 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Alternatives to Contentious Inputs (WP SOIL)
    Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 1 Organic-PLUS - grant agreement No [774340] Pathways to phase-out contentious inputs from organic agriculture in Europe Deliverable 5.2: Version 1.1 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL) Versions Version: 1.0 (December 2018) First version Version: 1.2 (31 January 2019) With feedback from all authors. Funding This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No [774340 — Organic-PLUS] 10 2.3 Versioni 2.3.1 Sigillo e logotipo verticale Per una maggiore versatilità è disponibile anche la versione verticale di sigillo e logotipo da utilizzare nel caso non sia possibile l’uso della versione orizzontale. Anche in questo caso la singola parte (A) viene usata per determinare la distanza tra sigillo e logotipo. A 2.3.2 Logotipo orizzontale È possibile utilizzare il solo logotipo nella versione orizzontale qualora la dimensione del sigillo dovesse risultare più piccola delle dimensioni minime consigliate (vedi 2.5.1) o, nel contesto, la riproduzione del sigillo potesse risultare pleonastica e ridondante. Organic-PLUS D5.2 Report on alternatives to contentious inputs (WP SOIL). page 2 Project Details: Programme: H2020, SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURITY – RESILIENT AND RESOURCE- EFFICIENT VALUE CHAINS Call topic: SFS-08-2017, (RIA) Organic inputs – contentious inputs in organic farming Project Title: Pathways to phase-out contentious inputs from organic agriculture in Europe Project
    [Show full text]
  • NASAA Certified Organic INPUT DIRECTORY for ORGANIC PRODUCTION and PROCESSING
    NASAA Certified Organic INPUT DIRECTORY for ORGANIC PRODUCTION and PROCESSING VALID UNTIL 31 JANUARY 2019 NASAA Certified Organic PHONE +61 8 7231 7700 EMAIL [email protected] www.nasaacertifiedorganic.com.au NASAA Certified Organic Input Directory for Organic Production and Processing Valid until 31 January 2019 The NASAA Certified Organic Input Directory lists input products assessed as compliant against the NASAA Organic and Biodynamic Standard and the National Standard for Organic and Biodynamic Produce. Products are listed under six different categories: Crop Fertilisers and Soil Amendments Crop Management and Pest Control Livestock Production Materials Edible Minerals Processing and Handling Products Seeds and Plant Materials The inputs included in the 2018 directory* are certified at the time of publishing which is valid until 31 January 2019. As the data may change over 12 months, it is best to also check the NCO website for the latest list of certified input manufacturer and products. Note, if you are certified to additional certification programs such as USDA NOP or JAS, please make sure you obtain a copy of the approval for inputs for the relevant additional standard. USDA NOP Compliance for individual products is listed where applicable in this directory (NOP Compliance Letters are valid for 12 months only). If you have any further questions or feedback, please contact the NCO Office. Certification Team NASAA Certified Organic PO Box 768 Stirling SA 5152 Tel +61 8 7231 7700 Fax +61 8 8370 8381 Email [email protected] www.nasaacertifiedorganic.com.au *While NCO makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of information in this document, we accept no responsibility for information, which may later prove to be misrepresented or inaccurate, or reliance placed on that information by users.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgerows for California Agriculture
    Hedgerows for California Agriculture A Resource Guide By Sam Earnshaw 1=;;C<7BG/::7/<13E7B64/;7:G4/@;3@A P.O. Box 373, Davis, CA 95616 (530) 756-8518 www.caff.org [email protected] A project funded by Western Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Copyright © 2004, Community Alliance with Family Farmers All rights reserved. No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. Acknowledgements All pictures and drawings by Sam Earnshaw except where noted. Insect photos by Jack Kelly Clark reprinted with permission of the UC Statewide IPM Program. Design and production by Timothy Rice. Thank you to the following people for their time and inputs to this manual: The Statewide Technical Team: John Anderson, Hedgerow Farms, Winters Robert L. Bugg, University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (UC SAREP), Davis Jeff Chandler, Cornflower Farms, Elk Grove Rex Dufour, National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT)/ Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas (ATTRA), Davis Phil Foster, Phil Foster Ranches, San Juan Bautista Gwen Huff, CAFF, Fresno Molly Johnson, CAFF, Davis Rachael Long, University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE Yolo County), Woodland Megan McGrath, CAFF, Sebastopol Daniel Mountjoy, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Salinas Corin Pease, University of California, Davis Paul Robins, Yolo County Resource Conservation District (RCD), Woodland Thank you also to: Jo Ann Baumgartner (Wild Farm Alliance, Watsonville), Cindy Fake (UCCE Placer and Nevada Counties), Josh Fodor (Central Coast Wilds), Tara Pisani Gareau (UC Santa Cruz), Nicky Hughes (Elkhorn Native Plant Nursery), Pat Regan (Rana Creek Habitat Restoration), William Roltsch (CDFA Biological Control Program, Sacramento) and Laura Tourte (UCCE Santa Cruz County).
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH WARNING Garden Soils Contain Micro-Organisms That May Be Harmful to Your Health. Always Wear Gloves, Keep Damp While in U
    Manure Soil Conditioners Mulch • 70l Sheep Manure • 30L Mushroom Compost • 30L Water Saving Black Mulch • 70L Composted Cow • 25L Organic Compost • 36L Pinebark Mulch • 40L Chicken Manure • 20kg Bentonite Clay • Compressed Pea Straw Bales • 30L Blended Manure • 25L Charlie Charcoal • Pea hay Bales 900x400x300 • 5L Peat Moss • 45L DSATCO Lupin Mulch Fertilisers • Cocopete Bricks 29*29*11cm • Compressed CCC Eco Bale • NPK – All Purpose 500g or 3kg • 5kg Rocky Rockydust • DSATCO Sugarcane Mulch • Blood n Bone – 2.5kg, 8kg or 15kg • 10kg Gypsum • Black Magic Rose Food • 25L Native Concentrate • Maxicrop Seaweed Fertiliser • 25L Vegetable Concentrate Potting • 2.5kg Fruit & Citrus Food • 2Ltr Eco Lime Hose on • 25L Super Booster Potting Mix • 2.5kg Native Plant Food • 500ml Eco Lime • 30L Premium Potting Mix • Thrive Slow Release Fertiliser 500g • Perlite 5L or 30L Pest Control • 35L DSATCO Piggiepost Lawn Care • 1L White Oil RTU • 25L Blueberry Mix • Easy Wetta Granules 5kg or 10kg • 1L Rose Oil RTU • 5L Seed Raising Mix • 2.5L Easy Wetta Hose-On • 500g Ant Kill Granules • 25L Rose Planting Mix • 5kg Lawn Food • 1Ltr Weed Kill for Lawns RTU • 5Ltr Vermiculite • 10kg Dynamic Lifter Lawn Food • Diatomaceous Earth 2kg or 200g • Yates Lawn Fertiliser 2.5kg Products available for Delivery or Pick up (See below for delivery conditions) Delivery conditions Poo4You will deliver to Perth metro area only – anything outside this area will incur a delivery fee. Minimum 10 bags of sheep/cow manure or $100 worth of combined products (conditions apply on Pea Hay Bales) Please read all instructions and health warnings before applying HEALTH WARNING Garden soils contain micro-organisms that may be harmful to your health.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenbelt Farmers: Sustaining Soil Health Headlands Ag-Enviro Solutions
    Greenbelt Farmers: Sustaining Soil Health Headlands Ag-Enviro Solutions Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Papers December 2018 Copyright © 2018 Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation All Rights Reserved Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation 661 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1Z9 Canada Tel (416) 960-0001 Fax (416) 960-0030 [email protected] www.greenbelt.ca ISSN 1912-4171 Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper Series (Print) ISSN 1912-418X Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper Series (Online) The Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation is committed to promoting awareness and education about Ontario’s Greenbelt. To this end we occasionally publish research and general interest papers that explore our three program areas: viable agriculture and viticulture; vibrant rural communities; and, a restored and protected natural environment. Greenbelt Farmers: Sustaining Soil Health Prepared by Headlands Ag-Enviro Solutions ISBN 978-1-927075-13-5 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors only and do not necessarily represent the views of the Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation, their Officers or Directors. We have done our best to confirm that all facts and figures are accurate. However, we do not retain liability for any errors or misrepresentations. All photographs are courtesy of Mel Luymes unless otherwise credited. As the researchers and authors of this report, Mel Luymes and Glen Munroe would like to thank the farmers and families who volunteered to participate
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery and Re-Use of Domestic Wastewaters Using Integrated Algal Ponding Systems: a Key Strategy in Sustainable Sanitation
    13 Salinity, Sanitation and Sustainability: A Study in Environmental Biotechnology and Integrated Wastewater Beneficiation in South Africa Salinity, Salinity, Sanitation and Sustainability: Report 13 Recovery and Re-use of Domestic Wastewaters Using Integrated Algal Ponding Systems: A Key Strategy in Sustainable Sanitation SJ Horan, MP Horan, NG Mohale, KJ Whittington-Jones and PD Rose WRC Report No TT 390/09 W a t e r R e s e a r c h C o m m i s s i o n Private Bag X03, Gezina 0031, South Africa 13 Tel: +27 12 330 0340, Fax: +27 12 331 2565 Web: http://www.wrc.org.za Water Research Commission REPORTS in the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION PROJECT SERIES SALINITY, SANITATION and SUSTAINABILITY A Study in Environmental Biotechnology and Integrated Wastewater Beneficiation in South Africa Report 1: Volume 1 - Overview Report 7: Volume 3 - Integrated Algal 7 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 1 of Domestic and Industrial Wastewaters Part 4: System Performance and Tertiary Treatment Operations Report 2: Volume 2 - Integrated Algal Report 8: Volume 3 - Integrated Algal 8 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 2 Ponding Systems and the Treatment of Saline Wastewaters of Domestic and Industrial Wastewaters Part 1: Meso-Saline Wastewaters Part 5: Winery and Distillery Wastewaters The Spirulina Model Report 3: Volume 2 - Integrated Algal Report 9: Volume 4 - The Rhodes BioSURE Process ® 3 Ponding Systems and the Treatment 9 of Saline Wastewaters Part 1: Biodesalination of Mine Drainage Wastewaters Part 2: Hyper-Saline Wastewaters The Dunaliella Model Report
    [Show full text]
  • The Land Steward's Guide to Vineyard and Orchard Erosion Control
    The Land Steward’s Guide to Vineyard and Orchard Erosion Control Sonoma County Department of Agriculture/Weights & Measures 133 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 110, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Phone: (707) 565-2371 Fax: (707) 565-3850 Website: www.sonomacounty.ca.gov/AWM The Land Steward’s Guide to Vineyard and Orchard Erosion Control | 2 Acknowledgements This Guide was prepared by the Land Stewardship Division of the Sonoma County Department of Agriculture/Weights & Measures. It is a collective creation made possible by past and present staff whose contributions, insights, and perspectives have coalesced into The Land Steward’s Guide to Vineyard and Orchard Erosion Control. It is also a recompilation of existing material from numerous sources. We are deeply grateful to contributors, practitioners, and agencies who shared freely of their expertise and time. We thank the following reviewers for their thoughtful comments: North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board Sonoma Resource Conservation District Russian Riverkeeper LACO Associates University of California Cooperative Extension We gratefully acknowledge the previous works of these Resource Conservation Districts (RCD): Sonoma RCD Goldridge RCD Napa County RCD RCD of Monterey County Marin RCD Upper Salinas – Las Tablas RCD This publication was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service through Grant 15-SCBGP-CA-0046. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the USDA. Contact Sonoma County Department of Agriculture/Weights & Measures 133 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 110, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Phone: (707) 565-2371 Fax: (707) 565-3850 Email: [email protected] Website: www.sonomacounty.ca.gov/AWM Disclaimer The information provided in this Guide is to assist vineyard and orchard operators on general principles of erosion control.
    [Show full text]
  • JAS 104 2019 34 to 44
    UHI Research Database pdf download summary Seaweed fertilisation impacts the chemical and isotopic composition of barley Blanz, Magdalena; Ascough, Philippa; Mainland, Ingrid; Martin, Peter; Taggart, Mark A.; Dieterich, Burkart; Wishart, John; Sayle, Kerry L.; Raab, Andrea; Feldmann, Jörg Published in: Journal of Archaeological Science Publication date: 2019 Publisher rights: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The re-use license for this item is: CC BY-NC-ND The Document Version you have downloaded here is: Peer reviewed version The final published version is available direct from the publisher website at: 10.1016/j.jas.2019.02.003 Link to author version on UHI Research Database Citation for published version (APA): Blanz, M., Ascough, P., Mainland, I., Martin, P., Taggart, M. A., Dieterich, B., Wishart, J., Sayle, K. L., Raab, A., & Feldmann, J. (2019). Seaweed fertilisation impacts the chemical and isotopic composition of barley: Implications for analyses of archaeological skeletal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 104, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.02.003 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the UHI Research Database are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights: 1) Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the UHI Research Database for the purpose of private study or research. 2) You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 3) You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the UHI Research Database Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details; we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • OWC 2020 Paper Submission
    OWC 2020 Paper Submission - Science Forum Topic 4 - Innovation in Organic farming: “thinking out of the Box” OWC2020-SCI-463 HARVESTING OUR FERTILISERS FROM THE SEA - AN APPROACH TO CLOSE THE NUTRIENT GAPS IN ORGANIC FARMING Anne-Kristin Løes* 1, Ishita Ahuja1, Anne de Boer2 1Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture (NORSØK), 2NIBIO, Tingvoll, Norway Preferred Presentation Method: Oral or poster presentation Full Paper Publication: No Abstract: Organic production in Europe is currently dependent on the input of fertilisers derived from conventional agriculture, such as farmyard manure, slurry and fertilisers derived from slaugther residues. A significant part of the nutrient flows in our food systems goes in one direction, from land to sea, via sewage and leaching. Harvesting marine organisms for fertilisation, or utilising residual materials e.g. from fish industry as fertilisers, may close such nutrient gaps and promote active cycling of nutrients. At NORSØK, we are studying the use of algae fibre (rich in potassium (K), magnesium and sulphur) and fishbones (rich in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and calcium) as fertilisers. High yields were produced with fishbones, and the short-term N availability was much higher than for mineral N fertiliser or dried poultry manure. Plants with a long period of nutrient uptake benefited from algae fertiliser. However, seaweeds contain significant amounts of arsenic (As), and easily available K may impact a balanced mineral content in the food or feed products. Excess P in the fishbones may cause eutrophication of this fertiliser is appplied to cover N demands of the crop. Research is needed to make a well balanced commercial fertiliser.
    [Show full text]
  • Sico Fertilisers Engels
    DELIVERY PROGRAM FERTILISERS ® SICO FERTILISERS & TAILORMADE FERTILISERS YOUR PASSPORT TO THE WORLD OF FERTILISERS SICO FERTILISERS® : EVERY TIME THE RIGHT SOLUTION ! We are one of Belgium’s leading agricultural producers & suppliers offering a complete portfolio & well known brands of general & specialty fertilisers. We hold Belgian licence nr. ME/159 with our Federal Agency for Safety of the Food Chain (FASCFC). A) SICO® GENERAL FERTILISERS 1) Nitrogen Fertilisers The nitrogen (N) element is very important for leaf crops and is the most important element from an environmental point of view. N is also the most important growth and yield factor. 1.1.1. Ammonium Nitrate Products: Substitution guide 1.2.0. SICO-ANS Ammonium Nitrate Sulphate 26%N + 13% S 1.2.1. SICO BOR-ANS Ammonium Nitrate Sulphate with Boron 26% N + 13%S + 0.3%B 1.2.2. SICO-AMMONIT -L18 Ammonium Nitrate liquid 18% 1.3.1. SICO-AS Crystal Ammonium Sulphate 21% N + 24% S, fertiliser grade, white crystals + sales rationale, TOPQUALITY (also technical and food grades available) (origin EU) 1.3.3. SICO-AS Gran. Ammonium Sulphate 21% N + 24% S granules, 2 mm (US) and 3 mm (origin EU) 1.3.4. SICO-AMSUL CR: Ammonium Sulphate (Caprolactam grade) min. 21% N + 24% S, crystalline (origin China) 1.3.5. SICO-AMSUL GR: Ammonium Sulphate min. 20.5% N + 23% S, granulated (compacted) (origin China) 1.4.0. CAL-AM-NIT® Sico brand of Calcium Ammonium Nitrate 27% N (white granular) (origin EU) 1.4.1. CAL-AM-NIT® + 4 MgO, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate 27% N + 4% MgO (grey granular) 1.4.2.
    [Show full text]