DOCSLIB.ORG

Preferred Options for the Core Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preferred Options for the Core Strategy Transformation and Sustainability SHEFFIELD DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PREFERRED OPTIONS FOR THE CORE STRATEGY For consideration by Cabinet, 8 February 2006 Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Availability of this document See Chapter 2 ‘How to Comment’ If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format, Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English, please contact us for this to be arranged: telephone (0114) 273 4212, or e-mail [email protected], or write to: SDF Team Development Services Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction to Preferred Options 1 2. How to Comment on the Options 5 3. Policy Context and Overall Vision 7 4. Aims and Objectives 11 5. A Spatial Vision for Sheffield 19 6. Preferred Options: Citywide 27 Business and Industry 27 Retail and Built Leisure 32 Housing 37 Open Space and Sports Facilities 43 Environment 45 Waste Management 50 Transport 51 7. Preferred Options: Areas 61 City Centre 61 Lower Don Valley 71 Upper Don Valley 75 Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 80 North East Urban Area 83 South East Urban Area 87 South and West Area 88 Mosborough/Woodhouse 89 Chapeltown/Ecclesfield 91 Stocksbridge/Deepcar 93 Rural Settlements 96 APPENDIX Emerging and Preferred Options 97 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE PREFERRED OPTIONS What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1.1 The Sheffield Development Framework is the City’s response to its new statutory requirement to prepare a Local Development Framework. The Local Development Framework comprises a set of planning documents, which will include Development Plan Documents to replace the existing Unitary Development Plan. What is the Core Strategy? 1.2 The first of these Development Plan Documents is known as the Core Strategy. This will provide the overall spatial strategy for the city. It will answer the question, ‘At a strategic level, what is going to happen, where, and how is it going to happen?’ So, the Core Strategy will: contain the aims and overall strategy and high-level policy make connections with other major strategies such as the: - National planning policy and guidance - Securing the Future: the UK Government sustainable development strategy. - Regional Spatial Strategy - Regional Economic Strategy - The Sheffield City Regional Development Programme element of the Northern Way - South Yorkshire Spatial Vision - City Strategy (Sheffield’s community strategy) and other strategies under its umbrella - Housing Market Renewal ‘Pathfinder’ strategy - Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 identify the main spatial patterns over the next 15 years set out locational criteria where it is not possible to be more specific about spatial policy. 1.3 It will not include development control criteria, though its policies may still be used to support specific decisions on planning applications. What about the issues not covered by the Core Strategy? 1.4 Some issues will be dealt with in other Development Plan Documents: City Policies – setting out all the regulatory policies to guide planning decisions and preparation of planning briefs City Sites – including all the site allocations (housing, business etc.) -1- Proposals Map – providing the spatial dimension for the policies and proposals of all the Development Plan Documents, showing areas and links on an Ordnance Survey map base. Emerging Options for these documents will be available for consultation at the same time as the Preferred Options for the Core Strategy. The timetable for completing these documents is contained in the Local Development Scheme (April 2005 – March 2009). 1.5 At a later stage, we will be preparing Area Action Plans and Supplementary Planning Documents, but these will be started when the main citywide documents have been drafted. How do the Preferred Options fit in? 1.6 Government guidance requires the Council to involve communities in the development of options for its Local Development Framework. This involvement should be a continuous process rather than one discrete exercise. In practice, there need to be defined stages within this process and the first of these was the consultation on Emerging Options for the Core Strategy in June and July 2005. This consultation explored the choices that are available between different types of development and different areas. 1.7 The present stage of the preparation process narrows the Emerging Options down to Preferred Options. These are not yet fully developed policies but indicate the broad directions that the Council has in mind. They take account of: Comments received on the Emerging Options and earlier consultations Sustainability Appraisal Equality Appraisal The new City Strategy The new draft Regional Spatial Strategy Other strategies and masterplans, including the Local Transport Plan 2006-2011, the City Centre Masterplan and development frameworks for the Housing Market Renewal ‘Pathfinder’ area Consideration of the prospects for making the options happen in practice Ongoing technical work. The status of Preferred Options 1.8 Unlike the Emerging Options, the Preferred Options have been approved by the Council, but only as a basis for consultation. They provide an indication of the policies that the Council is thinking of submitting to the Government. 1.9 The options will begin to influence other plan preparation and if there is significant clear support in the consultation, they might even be considered material in some planning decisions. But, it must be emphasised that they do not replace the Unitary Development Plan. This remains the statutory -2- development plan for the city until the new policies are formally approved. Although the Preferred Options are more recent and take account of changing circumstances they do not carry statutory weight because they have not yet been through the public scrutiny required for that. 1.10 In some areas, there are few or no Preferred Options. This is usually for one of two reasons: It is envisaged that the area will remain fairly stable – no major choices are anticipated and the emphasis will be on regulatory policies in the City Policies document to safeguard the character and conditions of these areas. In other areas, there is a lot of regeneration activity but the impacts are generally quite local. This activity will bring about significant improvements and, hopefully, greater stability to these areas. But there may not be meaningful strategic options for their basic character or land uses. 1.11 We have tried to identify all the strategic spatial choices for the next 15 years. But it is still possible that we have omitted some, for example, because we are not yet aware of new initiatives that major stakeholders are hoping to take. The Preferred Options consultation will help to show if there are still any foreseeable options that we have overlooked. 1.12 But most of the underlying principles that need to inform planning strategy are becoming fairly clear and these have influenced the choice and evaluation of the Emerging Options. These are outlined in Chapter 4, on Aims and Objectives. What about the consultation on issues for the UDP Review? 1.13 Many comments were received in 2002 about the questions posed for the now superseded review of the Unitary Development Plan. Comments made then are being fed into the new process and we will report on this as the work proceeds. That consultation was about the questions that needed asking in considering new policies. The present consultation goes on to pose answers to those questions that are about Core Strategy matters. -3- 2 HOW TO COMMENT ON THE OPTIONS What to comment on 2.1 We have now reached a formal consultation stage for the Core Strategy Preferred Options and the associated Sustainability Appraisal Report. We are also simultaneously carrying out informal consultation on the Emerging Options for the City Policies, City Sites and Proposals Map. 2.2 We would welcome your views on any or all of the above documents but recognise that there is a lot of material and you will want to give us your considered view. Therefore, please concentrate your comments on the aspects that concern you most. Do you support the vision, aims, objectives and spatial vision in the Core Strategy: Preferred Options document? Do you support the Preferred Options for the Core Strategy? When commenting on the Preferred Options please remember to provide us with the option reference number and your reasons. Where to view material 2.3 All documents can be viewed or downloaded on the Council’s website: www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/planning-and-city-development/planning- documents/sdf Reference copies are available at First Point at: Howden House (1 Union Street in the City Centre) Chapeltown (Station Road) Hillsborough (in the Barracks) and also at all Sheffield Library Branches, including the local studies section of the Central Library. 2.4 If you are unable to visit one of these facilities and do not have access to the internet then please contact the SDF Team (see contact details below) and copies will be made available to you. 2.5 If you wish to buy a hard copy of a document (or an extract) please contact the SDF Team (see contact details below). 2.6 If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format, Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English, please contact us for this to be arranged (see contact details below). -5- How to send us your views 2.7 You can comment on all of the documents referred to in paragraph 2.1 above in a number of ways: You can download a comment form from the Council’s website: www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/planning-and-city- development/planning-documents/sdf/consultation-on-the-sdf You can send your comments by email to [email protected] or write to us at: SDF Team Development Services Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Please ensure your comments reach us no later than Monday 10 April 2006.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sheffield Town Walk
    6 8 7 1 1 P D this document please recycle it recycle please document this on 55% recycled paper recycled 55% on When you have finished with finished have you When This document is printed is document This 55% k u . v o g . d l e i f f e h s . w w w s e c i v r e S t n e m p o l e v e D g n i k l a w / k u . v o g . d l e i f f e h s . w w w l i c n u o C y t i C d l e i f f e h S m u r o F g n i k l a W d l e i f f e h S ) 5 1 ( e r a u q S e s i d a r a P 4 0 4 4 3 7 2 4 1 1 0 t c a t n o c e s a e l p y b d e c u d o r P . n a g e b , s t a m r o f e v i t a n r e t l a n i d e i l p p u s ) 6 1 ( e u g o g a n y S k l a w e h t e r e h w e d a r a P e b n a c t n e m u c o d s i h T t s a E o t n o k c a b t f e l t s a p e h t f o s e o h c E K L A W s s o r C • n r u t – t h g i r n r u t – e n a L o p m a C .
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Policy
    SUCCESSFUL NEIGHBOURHOODS 9th July 2009 SCRUTINY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Closed Circuit Television 1. Introduction 1.1 This report presents to the Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Development Board with information to support discussions on: • The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land • The legal powers available to use CCTV in different scenario’s • The way in which the South Yorkshire Police and the City Council supervise CCTV’s use • The degree to which such systems have proved to be useful in deterring and detecting crime and anti-social behaviour • Ethics and civil liberty issues which restrain the use of CCTV on public and private land 1.2 This information is provided in respect of the City Council’s CCTV monitoring station only. 2. Background 2.1 The City Councils CCTV monitoring station receives images from 136 cameras situated around Sheffield City Centre and a number of inner City locations. The equipment is linked by fibre optic network and images are shared with the SWISS (Sheffield Wide Imaging Switching System) partners. Partners include South Yorkshire Police, Meadowhall, Supertram and Urban Traffic Control. The station also monitors a range of audio feeds including Pubwatch, CCRAC (City Centre Retailers against Crime) and Airwaves (Police Communications System). 2.2 The Monitoring Station also monitors Bus Lane traffic in the Wicker and Hillsborough areas and provides images recording contraventions to Urban Traffic Control. 3. The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land 3.1 Attached at Appendix A is list of camera’s and their locations within the City.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town Cl740-Cl820
    The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town cl740-cl820 Neville Flavell PhD The Division of Adult Continuing Education University of Sheffield February 1996 Volume Two PART TWO THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN <2 6 ?- ti.«» *• 3 ^ 268 CHAPTER 14 EXPANSION FROM 1736 IGOSLING) TO 1771 (FAIRBANKS THE TOWN IN 1736 Sheffield in Gosling's 1736 plan was small and relatively compact. Apart from a few dozen houses across the River Dun at Bridgehouses and in the Wicker, and a similar number at Parkhill, the whole of the built-up area was within a 600 yard radius centred on the Old Church.1 Within that brief radius the most northerly development was that at Bower Lane (Gibraltar), and only a limited incursion had been made hitherto into Colson Crofts (the fields between West Bar and the river). On the western and north-western edges there had been development along Hollis Croft and White Croft, and to a lesser degree along Pea Croft and Lambert Knoll (Scotland). To the south-west the building on the western side of Coalpit Lane was over the boundary in Ecclesall, but still a recognisable part of the town.2 To the south the gardens and any buildings were largely confined by the Park wall which kept Alsop Fields free of dwellings except for the ingress along the northern part of Pond Lane. The Rivers Dun and Sheaf formed a natural barrier on the east and north-east, and the low-lying Ponds area to the south-east was not ideal for house construction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town Cl740-Cl820
    The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town cl740-cl820 Neville Flavell PhD The Division of Adult Continuing Education University of Sheffield February 1996 Volume One THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SHEFFIELD AND THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN cl740-c 1820 Neville Flavell February 1996 SUMMARY In the early eighteenth century Sheffield was a modest industrial town with an established reputation for cutlery and hardware. It was, however, far inland, off the main highway network and twenty miles from the nearest navigation. One might say that with those disadvantages its future looked distinctly unpromising. A century later, Sheffield was a maker of plated goods and silverware of international repute, was en route to world supremacy in steel, and had already become the world's greatest producer of cutlery and edge tools. How did it happen? Internal economies of scale vastly outweighed deficiencies. Skills, innovations and discoveries, entrepreneurs, investment, key local resources (water power, coal, wood and iron), and a rapidly growing labour force swelled largely by immigrants from the region were paramount. Each of these, together with external credit, improved transport and ever-widening markets, played a significant part in the town's metamorphosis. Economic and population growth were accompanied by a series of urban developments which first pushed outward the existing boundaries. Considerable infill of gardens and orchards followed, with further peripheral expansion overspilling into adjacent townships. New industrial, commercial and civic building, most of it within the central area, reinforced this second phase. A period of retrenchment coincided with the French and Napoleonic wars, before a renewed surge of construction restored the impetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009
    6088 Core Strategy Cover:A4 Cover & Back Spread 6/3/09 16:04 Page 1 Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009 Sheffield Core Strategy Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted by the City Council on 4th March 2009 Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield City Council Sheffield Core Strategy Core Strategy Availability of this document This document is available on the Council’s website at www.sheffield.gov.uk/sdf If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format ,Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English,please contact us for this to be arranged: l telephone (0114) 205 3075, or l e-mail [email protected], or l write to: SDF Team Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield Core Strategy INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction to the Core Strategy 1 What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1 What is the Core Strategy? 1 PART 1: CONTEXT, VISION, OBJECTIVES AND SPATIAL STRATEGY Chapter 2 Context and Challenges 5 Sheffield: the story so far 5 Challenges for the Future 6 Other Strategies 9 Chapter 3 Vision and Objectives 13 The Spatial Vision 13 SDF Objectives 14 Chapter 4 Spatial Strategy 23 Introduction 23 Spatial Strategy 23 Overall Settlement Pattern 24 The City Centre 24 The Lower and Upper Don Valley 25 Other Employment Areas in the Main Urban Area 26 Housing Areas 26 Outer Areas 27 Green Corridors and Countryside 27 Transport Routes 28 PART
    [Show full text]
  • Central Community Assembly Area Areas and Sites
    Transformation and Sustainability SHEFFIELD LOCAL PLAN (formerly Sheffield Development Framework) CITY POLICIES AND SITES DOCUMENT CENTRAL COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AREA AREAS AND SITES BACKGROUND REPORT Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street SHEFFIELD S1 2SH June 2013 CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 1 Part 1: City Centre 2. Policy Areas in the City Centre 5 3. Allocated Sites in the City Centre 65 Part 2: Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 4. Policy Areas in Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 133 5. Allocated Sites in Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 175 Part 3: South and West Urban Area 6. Policy Areas in the South and West Urban Area 177 7. Allocated Sites in the South and West Urban Area 227 Part 4: Upper Don Valley 8. Policy Areas 239 9. Allocated Sites in Upper Don Valley 273 List of Tables Page 1 Policy Background Reports 3 2 Potential Capacity of Retail Warehouse Allocations 108 List of Figures Page 1 Consolidated Central and Primary Shopping Areas 8 2 Illustrative Block Plan for The Moor 9 3 Current Street Level Uses in the Cultural Hub 15 4 Priority Office Areas 21 5 City Centre Business Areas 28 6 City Centre Neighbourhoods 46 7 City Centre Open Space 57 8 Bramall Lane/ John Street 139 1. INTRODUCTION The Context 1.1 This report provides evidence to support the published policies for the City Policies and Sites document of the Sheffield Local Plan. 1.2 The Sheffield Local Plan is the new name, as used by the Government, for what was known as the Sheffield Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Responses for Service 32 Proposed Changes in Sheffield
    Consultation responses for service 32 proposed changes in Sheffield Response ID Preferred Option General feedback 11 Option 1 13 Option 2 16 Option 2 17 Option 1 Yet again residents of Foxhill and Parson Cross are set to lose out on bus services. Every time there is a consultation buses in the poorer parts of Sheffield take a hit. How about giving these areas a service like Crookes Lodge Moor and Ecclesfield . If we had that level of service buses would be used in these areas . However because the area comprises of mainly elderley and young families these areas don't get a fair deal because presumably they aren't profitable .. Then every time there is a review these areas lose out . Just leave the service as it is 18 Option 2 It would be even better to have considered Foxhill services in the round: 35/135, 86, M92 and 32. The 86 is a dreadful service (round-the-houses, non-clockface-timings), neither 35 or 135 going into town on Sundays. The 32 and M92 could be combined? 19 Option 1 So current users of 32 are no longer wanted in the centre of Sheffield by terminating and leaving from a shortened route in the centre and making school children walk through town to the Bus Station, not very safe at all. 20 Option 1 I am quite happy with the changes to the Foxhill end of the route, but extremely unhappy about the changes to the stops in town. I am disabled and find it hard to walk so when I have to visit the Foot Clinic on Norfolk Street, I find the bus stopping on Arundel Gate is just right.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2005 Burngreave Messenger
    Issue 52 Free to everyone in Burngreave June 2005 Voice of the Burngreave Community Including: Pitsmoor, Ellesmere, Carwood, Firshill, Fir Vale, Pye Bank, Shirecliffe and Woodside Burngreave Community Radio R’n’B, Soul, Dance, Reggae, Get in touch if you Hip Hop, Africa Beat, World want to get involved Music, local bands, BNDfC 0773 987 8596 or 273 1040 election coverage, community [email protected] news and more… 96.1FM 25 June – 22 July [email protected] Funding to be confirmed Summer of fun Planning ahead for the summer? Make sure you get Burngreave’s events in your diary. First up is the Mile Run (left) and then the summer fairs at Firs Hill School 22nd June 2–4pm, St Catherine’s School 25th June 1.30–3.30pm, and Firs Hill TARA 2nd July 1–4pm. Then Abbeyfield Multicultural Festival (below), and Osgathorpe Jam One Love Festival (page 20). Don’t forget Pitsmoor Adventure Playground’s free trip to Alton Towers (page 20) and New Deal are off to the seaside (page 15). And all this with a soundtrack from Burngreave Community Radio (above). This year it will be helping to promote the New Deal elections, the deadline for ballots is 11th July, alongside the usual amazing mix of music, interviews and community news. If your group has something planned for the summer, get in touch with so we can put it in the next issue – due out on 16th July. The New Deal website also has an events listing, all you have to do is fill in an online form: http://www.bndfc.co.uk/.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield on Film Maps out the Many Roles the City’S Streets and Buildings Have Played on Film, Dating As Far Back As 1903
    It’s twenty years since The Full Monty came out, following hot on ‘71 (2014) the heels of that other Sheffield ‘classic’, When Saturday Comes. 1 Park Hill, South Street, S2 5PN Through the universal language of cinema, these globally successful but very localised films showed the world a city determined to get 2 Underbank Outdoor Activity Centre, on with it after the economic devastation of the 80s. Oaks Lane, S36 4GH As you’ll see, they weren’t the first pieces of cinema made in The Battle of Orgreave (2001) or about Sheffield. This is a place of many stories and varied 1 3 Orgreave, S13 landscapes, a city of grit and inventiveness. But since their release, Sheffield has become a lively place for film. 2 Four Lions (2010) Independent production company Warp Films set up here in ROTHERHAM4 Kebabish, 27 Wicker, S3 8JQ 2002, giving us pioneering, cutting-edge modern British cinema. 5 Library Theatre, Surrey Street, S1 1XZ 3 Key industry organisations like the South Yorkshire Filmmakers’ 11 6 Meersbrook Park, Network, the BFI’s Film Hub North and Cinema For All are based Chesterfield Road, S8 9FB 4 here, as well as Sheffield Hallam University’s well-respected film studies course and countless talented film-related individuals. Wincobank The Full Monty (1997) 5 There’s been an explosion of opportunities for watching films, from quality independent cinemas like the Showroom to 7 Jobcentre, 112 West Street, S1 3SY 65 international film festivals like Doc/Fest and Sensoria, and a 8 Crookes Cemetery, thriving community cinema scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Protocol for Cabinet Reports
    SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Cabinet Report 11 Report of: Executive Director, Place Directorate ______________________________________________________________ Date: 21st December 2011 ______________________________________________________________ Subject: City Centre Breathing Spaces Strategy ______________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Matt Hayman, City Development Division (35130) ______________________________________________________________ Summary: The City Centre Breathing Spaces Strategy outlines the Councils Strategy on delivering a programme of open space projects in the City Centre. It builds on a number of supporting policies to provide a clear vision for the creation of new high quality open spaces linked by a network of clear pedestrian routes. ______________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: In the light of the major increase in population there is a need to provide new and enhanced open space for City Centre residents and the Strategy provides a programme of projects to meet this need. The projects will also benefit visitors to the City Centre and contribute to the wider objective of creating a setting for increased investment and job creation. Key to delivering the Strategy will be greater geographical flexibility in the allocation of City Centre S106 open space funds. The Strategy seeks to increase community involvement through the Central Community Assembly by inviting views on the priorities for future major investment and establishing a fund for
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheffield Plan: Our City, Our Future Summary of Responses to the Consultation Questions on the City-Wide Options July 2016 D
    The Sheffield Plan: Our City, Our Future Summary of Responses to the Consultation Questions on the City-wide Options July 2016 Development Services Introduction Sustainability Appraisal and Equality Impacts Q1 - Does this document raise any specific equality impacts which would affect particular groups or communities of people in Sheffield? Type of comment Number of responses Percentage of responses Support 31 40% Conditional Support 19 24% Not Support 21 27% Neither support nor not support 7 9% Commenter Summary of comment 1 individual Protect threat of closure of music and pub venues from new residential development 1 individual Proper maintenance of council property 1 individual Need ability to challenge landlords' bedroom estimate, in relation to bedroom tax rules 1 individual Resurfacing roads in right order - worst first Gladman Developments Meet full Objectively Assessed Need, including for gypsy and travellers and older people Gladman Developments Undertake an Equality Impact Assessment 2 individuals Sheffield's ageing population has implications on health, social welfare and housing of Sheffield's aged population 2 individuals Post student population will not impact on housing demand as they will look elsewhere for career opportunities and financial enhancement Jaguar Estates Ltd & Wortley Developments Ltd (submitted by DLP Planning Ltd), Corker Paragraph 28 of the Interim Sustainability Assessment identifies that the equality aspects of Properties Ltd (submitted by DLP Planning Ltd ), Roger Fillingham, Rex Caplan and Peter Inclusion and Opportunities and Health and Wellbeing of the Sheffield Plan are integrated across Barnsley (submitted by DLP Planning Ltd), Clear Line Maintenance Ltd (submitted by DLP all the economic and social Sustainability Aims.
    [Show full text]
  • City Policies and Sites
    City Policies and Sites 1 INTRODUCTION 1 What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1 What is the City Policies and Sites document about? 1 What is the purpose of this Consultation Draft? 3 Proposals Map Key 4 Site Allocations 5 PART 1: CITY-WIDE POLICIES 2 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY AND SUSTAINABLE EMPLOYMENT 14 A1 Infrastructure Requirements and Developer Contributions 14 A2 Requirements for Economic Prosperity and Sustainable Employment 17 3 SERVING THE CITY REGION 19 B1 City Centre Design 19 B2 Development in the City Centre Shopping Streets and the Cultural Hub 22 4 ATTRACTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS 25 C1 Access to Local Services and Community Facilities in New Residential Developments 25 C2 Residential Design 27 C3 Safeguarding Sensitive Uses from Nuisance 29 C4 Development in District and Neighbourhood Centres 32 C5 Shopping and Leisure Development and Community Facilities outside Existing Centres 34 5 OPPORTUNITIES AND WELL-BEING FOR ALL 36 D1 Provision for the Needs of All Users 36 D2 Open Space in New Housing Developments 38 D3 Delivering Affordable Housing 39 6 TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT 43 E1 Development and Trip Generation 43 E2 Parking 46 E3 Design for Roads and Movement 49 7 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 52 F1 Pollution Control 52 F2 Requirements for Waste Management 54 8 GREEN ENVIRONMENT 57 G1 Safeguarding and Enhancing Biodiversity and Features of Geological Importance 57 Sheffield City Council City Policies and Sites G2 The Green Network 60 G3 Trees, Woodland and the South Yorkshire Forest 62 G4 Water
    [Show full text]