DOCSLIB.ORG

HS2 PHASE 2 STATIONS LCR Development Reviews Sheffield Victoria Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HS2 PHASE 2 STATIONS LCR Development Reviews Sheffield Victoria Station HS2 PHASE 2 STATIONS LCR Development Reviews Sheffield Victoria Station 27 January 2014 Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1 London & Continental Railways 1.2 Background 1.3 Development Reviews 2. HS2 Station Proposal 2.1 Urban Context 2.2 Proposed HS2 Station Design 3. Wider Development Area 3.1 Planning Policy Context 3.2 Land Ownership 3.3 Development & Market Background 3.4 Economic Growth 4. Analysis 4.1 Station Design 4.2 Connectivity and Interchange 4.3 Station & Interchange - Conclusions 4.4 Development & Delivery 5. Summary of Recommendations 6. Conclusions Appendix 1: Sheffield Local Plan: Pre-Submission Proposals Map Appendix 1: HS2 Victoria Sheffield City Council Ownership Plan 1 Executive Summary In autumn 2011, High Speed 2 (HS2) requested a presentation of the experience of London & Continental Railways Limited (LCR) in relation to delivering regeneration around the HS2 stations. From this presentation, LCR was asked to suggest how it could assist HS2 in promoting regeneration and development through Government’s investment in HS2 and LCR has undertaken Development Reviews of all the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Stations. The Phase 2 consultation route provides for a station at Sheffield Meadowhall, adjacent to the Meadowhall shopping centre, close to junction 34 of the M1 motorway. The site is approximately four miles north east of central Sheffield and three miles south-west of Rotherham, and linked to both (and other regional centres) by existing rail links. Sheffield City Council has lobbied for an additional or alternative station to be located closer to the city centre at the former Victoria Station site. It is understood that this proposal was rejected at optioneering stage by HS2 Ltd for a number of reasons, including the cost of additional tunnelling, additional journey times and the views of neighbouring authorities. Sheffield City Council has, nonetheless, requested LCR to undertake a Development Review of the regeneration opportunities that might arise from a station at Victoria. A costs/benefit comparison of this location compared to Meadowhall is specifically not a matter for this report, which instead includes a review of the earlier HS2 feasibility work together with observations on the proposed station design, transport interchange, regeneration opportunity and other issues for consideration. In addition, the planning context and the market background in the locality have been reviewed. The potential economic benefit of a station at Sheffield Victoria has been the subject of a variety of previous reports, which estimate between 7,000 and 9,000 net new jobs could be created, together with 900 homes, all close to a ward which is in the top 1% of deprived wards in the UK. Views differ on how much, if any, of this would be delivered without an HS2 station, however it is LCR’s opinion that a station would be a significant catalyst to achieving this. The Victoria location offers major opportunities for urban regeneration (on a par with, if not greater, than the most regeneration-friendly of other HS2 stations), including: - The proximity to the centre of the fifth largest city in the UK, and the most significant in South Yorkshire, providing strong underlying economic drivers, - The history of successful recent regeneration in this part of the city and associated mixed use occupational market, - The availability of land and sites to accommodate growth, - Existing good connections to the city and the region, with opportunities to further enhance these, - The potential to address existing deprivation and dereliction, - Riverside locations and heritage buildings and structures. There are barriers to regeneration (such as land assembly etc), however, indicating that a purely market-led approach may not be successful, and degrees of public sector intervention will be required. In particular, the current connectivity (notwithstanding relatively short distances) between the 2 Victoria location and both the city centre and the Sheffield Midland Station requires attention and, in particular, rail connections to adjoining regional centres. Improving these regional connections in to Victoria will be key to maximising wider economic benefits. Victoria is an exceptional location for a station, with its vantage point and commanding views over the city. There are some challenges and opportunities for the design of a well-connected and integrated station interchange at this location. Addressing these in a comprehensive and integrated manner can deliver a landmark HS2 station and transport hub at Victoria - one which, combined with complementary high quality urban realm and retail, could create an attractive place and destination in its own right – providing the catalyst for regeneration in Sheffield and the region. Should an HS2 station be located at Victoria, LCR recommend that the regeneration arm of HS2 engages with Sheffield City Council and SYPTE in the joint masterplanning and delivery of an integrated programme of transport and land-use developments at Victoria that will optimise the benefits for Sheffield City and the region. 3 1. Introduction This report has been prepared by London & Continental Railways Limited (LCR) for Sheffield City Council. 1.1 London & Continental Railways LCR is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Department for Transport (DfT). It was formed in 1996 as the successful bidder for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (now known as High Speed 1) PFI contract. LCR was responsible for the successful delivery of High Speed 1 on time and to budget. LCR retains ownership of the Government’s 40% share of Eurostar International Limited and has been restructured as a DfT- owned property and development company. Since inception, LCR has employed a small stations and property development team responsible for facilitating large scale regeneration around the new international stations most notably at King’s Cross and Stratford in London. The team was also involved as commercial client for the HS1 stations and promoted synergies and opportunities between the stations and the surrounding development sites. 1.2 Background “HS2 Regional Economic Impacts”, the KPMG report produced for HS2 in September 2013, suggests that investment in HS2 could potentially generate £15billion of additional output per year for the British economy in 2037 (2013 prices), by providing cities and regions with better connections. It also recognises that these cities and regions will need to have the capacity to accommodate the resultant growth in economic activity, including the availability of skilled labour and land in the right locations. Fullest realisation of the potential benefits may therefore require complementary changes to create an environment in each city in which businesses can develop. This may include, among other things, the enhancement of connectivity (at local, city and regional level), additional development to accommodate office, retail, residential, social and other uses (requiring major land-use developments or regeneration schemes at some locations) and appropriate facilities and resources for the development of the necessary local skills. Thus, HS2 Ltd can help to maximise the benefits of HS2 by working in partnership with local planning, transport and economic development authorities for each station to ensure: The HS2 stations are properly integrated with good local, city and regional connections This should create an efficient local transport network that builds on and distributes the benefits of the high-speed link. In some instances, it may require investment in new or enhanced connectivity. It should place each HS2 station at the heart of an efficient transport hub that is as convenient and attractive as possible – recognising that interchange is typically the least attractive part of a journey, and poor interchange can be a disincentive or barrier to mobility, eroding the benefits of good connectivity. These transport facilities are carefully integrated into surrounding land-uses and land-use developments 4 This may provide a unique opportunity to deliver high-value development at and around the HS2 stations, that takes greatest advantage of its location, and that will contribute to the economic development and, where appropriate, regeneration of the area. This should incorporate high-quality public realm improvements that will enhance the value of the property development, and the quality of life of those who live, work and play in the area, as well as those who travel through it. Altogether potentially creating an economically and socially vibrant destination in its own right. These investments are carried out in a way that supports and enables (or in some cases unlocks) wider regeneration schemes, to maximise the long-term economic benefits for the city/region This will be most effective and beneficial when done within the context of a masterplan or shared vision for the wider area – the developments at and around the HS2 stations can then provide a potent nucleus of earliest economic development that will support and kick-start development and regeneration across the wider area. An appropriate skills and training programme is jointly established with the local economic development authorities This should be designed to support the longer term economic growth in the city/region, and to ensure that maximum social benefits are realised in the city/region, by providing local people with a range of necessary skills. At some locations, this may involve collaboration with local industries, especially
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sheffield Town Walk
    6 8 7 1 1 P D this document please recycle it recycle please document this on 55% recycled paper recycled 55% on When you have finished with finished have you When This document is printed is document This 55% k u . v o g . d l e i f f e h s . w w w s e c i v r e S t n e m p o l e v e D g n i k l a w / k u . v o g . d l e i f f e h s . w w w l i c n u o C y t i C d l e i f f e h S m u r o F g n i k l a W d l e i f f e h S ) 5 1 ( e r a u q S e s i d a r a P 4 0 4 4 3 7 2 4 1 1 0 t c a t n o c e s a e l p y b d e c u d o r P . n a g e b , s t a m r o f e v i t a n r e t l a n i d e i l p p u s ) 6 1 ( e u g o g a n y S k l a w e h t e r e h w e d a r a P e b n a c t n e m u c o d s i h T t s a E o t n o k c a b t f e l t s a p e h t f o s e o h c E K L A W s s o r C • n r u t – t h g i r n r u t – e n a L o p m a C .
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield
    2019/1013 Applicant: National Grid Description: Planning application for National Grid's Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project involving the following works:1) Construction of a new sealing end compound, including permanent access; 2) Construction of a temporary haul road from Brook Hill Lane including widened bellmouth; 3) Construction of a temporary Trans Pennine Trail Diversion to be used for approximately 12 - 18 months; following construction approximately 410m of said diversion surface would be retained permanently; and 4) Erection of two bridges (one temporary and one permanent) along the Trans Pennine Trail diversion Site Address: Land off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield Site Description The site stretches from Dunford Bridge in the Peak District National Park to Wogden Foot LWS approximately 1.8km to the east. With the exception of the sealing end compounds at either end, the site is linear and broadly follows the route of the Trans Pennine Trail (TPT). At Dunford Bridge the site extends to the former rail tunnel entrance and includes the existing sealing end compound located behind properties on Don View. Beyond this is the TPT car park and the TPT itself which is a former rail line running from Dunford Bridge to Penistone; now utilised as a bridleway. The site takes in land adjacent the TPT along which a temporary diverted bridleway route is proposed. In addition, Wogden Foot, a Local Wildlife Site (LWS) located 1.8km to the east is included (in part) as the proposed location of a new sealing end compound; construction access to this from Windle Edge also forms part for the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Policy
    SUCCESSFUL NEIGHBOURHOODS 9th July 2009 SCRUTINY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Closed Circuit Television 1. Introduction 1.1 This report presents to the Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Development Board with information to support discussions on: • The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land • The legal powers available to use CCTV in different scenario’s • The way in which the South Yorkshire Police and the City Council supervise CCTV’s use • The degree to which such systems have proved to be useful in deterring and detecting crime and anti-social behaviour • Ethics and civil liberty issues which restrain the use of CCTV on public and private land 1.2 This information is provided in respect of the City Council’s CCTV monitoring station only. 2. Background 2.1 The City Councils CCTV monitoring station receives images from 136 cameras situated around Sheffield City Centre and a number of inner City locations. The equipment is linked by fibre optic network and images are shared with the SWISS (Sheffield Wide Imaging Switching System) partners. Partners include South Yorkshire Police, Meadowhall, Supertram and Urban Traffic Control. The station also monitors a range of audio feeds including Pubwatch, CCRAC (City Centre Retailers against Crime) and Airwaves (Police Communications System). 2.2 The Monitoring Station also monitors Bus Lane traffic in the Wicker and Hillsborough areas and provides images recording contraventions to Urban Traffic Control. 3. The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land 3.1 Attached at Appendix A is list of camera’s and their locations within the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to City Centre, South & East Planning and Highways Area Board
    SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Development, Environment and Leisure Directorate REPORT TO CITY CENTRE, SOUTH & DATE 19/06/2006 EAST PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS AREA BOARD REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATIONS UNDER VARIOUS ACTS/REGULATIONS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS SEE RECOMMENDATIONS HEREIN THE BACKGROUND PAPERS ARE IN THE FILES IN RESPECT OF THE PLANNING APPLICATIONS NUMBERED. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS N/A PARAGRAPHS CLEARED BY BACKGROUND PAPERS CONTACT POINT FOR ACCESS Howard Baxter TEL NO: 0114 2734556 Chris Heeley 0114 2736329 AREA(S) AFFECTED CATEGORY OF REPORT OPEN Application No. Location Page No. 04/04633/CAC Site Of Former Richardsons Cutlery Russell Street And Cotton Street And, Alma Street, 5 Sheffield, 04/04634/FUL Site Of Former Richardsons Cutlery Russell Street And Cotton Street And, Alma Street, 7 Sheffield, 04/04689/FUL Mylnhurst Convent School & Nursery, Button Hill, Sheffield, S11 9HJ 9 05/01274/FUL Crookesmoor House, 483 Crookesmoor Road, Sheffield, S10 1BG 22 05/01279/LBC Crookesmoor House, 483 Crookesmoor Road, Sheffield, S10 1BG 41 05/03455/FUL Site Of 32, Ryegate Road, Sheffield, 45 05/03489/OUT 89 London Road, Sheffield, S2 4LE 56 05/04913/FUL Land Adjacent To Vine Grove Farm, School Street, Mosborough, Sheffield, 66 06/00268/FUL Land At Blast Lane And, Broad Street, Sheffield, 74 06/00546/FUL 336 Ringinglow Road, Sheffield, S11 7PY 96 06/00642/OUT Site Of 2a, Cadman Street, Mosborough, Sheffield, S20 5BU 108 06/00731/FUL 69 High Street, Mosborough, Sheffield, S20 5AF 112 06/00821/FUL Former Grahams
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 7C
    Agenda Item 7c Case Number 19/00054/FUL Application Type Full Planning Application Proposal Erection of 430 dwellings with associated infrastructure including means of access, all-purpose bridge, drainage, open space and landscaping works Location Land East Of The River Don And To The South West Of Station Road Deepcar Sheffield S36 2SQ Date Received 02/01/2019 Team West and North Applicant/Agent Bloor Homes LTD Recommendation Grant Conditionally Subject to Legal Agreement Time limit for Commencement of Development 1. The development shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this decision. Reason: In order to comply with the requirements of the Town and Country Planning Act. Approved/Refused Plan(s) 2. The development must be carried out in complete accordance with the following approved documents: TO BE PROVIDED IN SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT Reason: In order to define the permission. Pre Commencement Condition(s) – (‘true conditions precedent’ – see notes for definition) 3. No development shall commence until supplementary intrusive site investigations and risk assessment in respect of contaminant impact to groundwater on the access land (west of the river) and surface waters has been carried out and a Page 33 Phase II be the subject of a Phase II Intrusive Site Investigation Report has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Report shall be prepared in accordance with Contaminated Land Report CLR 11 (Environment Agency 2004). Reason: In order to ensure that any contamination of the land is properly dealt with and the site is safe for the development to proceed, it is essential that this condition is complied with before the development is commenced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town Cl740-Cl820
    The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town cl740-cl820 Neville Flavell PhD The Division of Adult Continuing Education University of Sheffield February 1996 Volume Two PART TWO THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN <2 6 ?- ti.«» *• 3 ^ 268 CHAPTER 14 EXPANSION FROM 1736 IGOSLING) TO 1771 (FAIRBANKS THE TOWN IN 1736 Sheffield in Gosling's 1736 plan was small and relatively compact. Apart from a few dozen houses across the River Dun at Bridgehouses and in the Wicker, and a similar number at Parkhill, the whole of the built-up area was within a 600 yard radius centred on the Old Church.1 Within that brief radius the most northerly development was that at Bower Lane (Gibraltar), and only a limited incursion had been made hitherto into Colson Crofts (the fields between West Bar and the river). On the western and north-western edges there had been development along Hollis Croft and White Croft, and to a lesser degree along Pea Croft and Lambert Knoll (Scotland). To the south-west the building on the western side of Coalpit Lane was over the boundary in Ecclesall, but still a recognisable part of the town.2 To the south the gardens and any buildings were largely confined by the Park wall which kept Alsop Fields free of dwellings except for the ingress along the northern part of Pond Lane. The Rivers Dun and Sheaf formed a natural barrier on the east and north-east, and the low-lying Ponds area to the south-east was not ideal for house construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Works Replacement 2018 Rail
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION June 2018 Area 2 works 2018 RAIL REPLACEMENT WORKS Important Customer Information Birley Lane to Halfway 23rd June – 8th August For information on tickets and services: supertram.com travelsouthyorkshire.com 2018 RAIL REPLACEMENT PROJECT Area 2 Rail replacement works Taking place: Where? Birley Lane to Halfway Planned works from: When? 23rd June to 8th August Trams will operate BLUE ROUTE Malin Bridge to Birley Lane YELLOW ROUTE Meadowhall to Middlewood * PURPLE ROUTE Herdings Park to Cathedral * Meadowhall on Sundays Tram replacement buses B2 BUS Birley Lane to Halfway Tram service information Blue route services The Blue route service will operate with a normal timetable between Malin Bridge and Birley Lane. Yellow route services During these works, a normal Yellow route will operate between Meadowhall and Middlewood. Purple route services During these works, a normal Purple route will operate between Herdings Park and Cathedral (Meadowhall on Sundays). supertram.com travelsouthyorkshire.com AREA 2 WORKS: 23rd June – 8th August What’s happening in Area 2? Work will take place to replace worn out track between Birley Lane and Donetsk Way. This is part of the Rail Replacement Project being managed by South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE). During these works, the Blue route trams will operate between Malin Bridge and Birley Lane. The information in this leaflet will let you know what is happening to trams, tram replacement buses and also what tickets are valid where. These works are essential in ensuring that trams can operate for years to come and we would like to apologise for any inconvenience you may experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town Cl740-Cl820
    The Economic Development of Sheffield and the Growth of the Town cl740-cl820 Neville Flavell PhD The Division of Adult Continuing Education University of Sheffield February 1996 Volume One THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SHEFFIELD AND THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN cl740-c 1820 Neville Flavell February 1996 SUMMARY In the early eighteenth century Sheffield was a modest industrial town with an established reputation for cutlery and hardware. It was, however, far inland, off the main highway network and twenty miles from the nearest navigation. One might say that with those disadvantages its future looked distinctly unpromising. A century later, Sheffield was a maker of plated goods and silverware of international repute, was en route to world supremacy in steel, and had already become the world's greatest producer of cutlery and edge tools. How did it happen? Internal economies of scale vastly outweighed deficiencies. Skills, innovations and discoveries, entrepreneurs, investment, key local resources (water power, coal, wood and iron), and a rapidly growing labour force swelled largely by immigrants from the region were paramount. Each of these, together with external credit, improved transport and ever-widening markets, played a significant part in the town's metamorphosis. Economic and population growth were accompanied by a series of urban developments which first pushed outward the existing boundaries. Considerable infill of gardens and orchards followed, with further peripheral expansion overspilling into adjacent townships. New industrial, commercial and civic building, most of it within the central area, reinforced this second phase. A period of retrenchment coincided with the French and Napoleonic wars, before a renewed surge of construction restored the impetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009
    6088 Core Strategy Cover:A4 Cover & Back Spread 6/3/09 16:04 Page 1 Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009 Sheffield Core Strategy Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted by the City Council on 4th March 2009 Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield City Council Sheffield Core Strategy Core Strategy Availability of this document This document is available on the Council’s website at www.sheffield.gov.uk/sdf If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format ,Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English,please contact us for this to be arranged: l telephone (0114) 205 3075, or l e-mail [email protected], or l write to: SDF Team Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield Core Strategy INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction to the Core Strategy 1 What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1 What is the Core Strategy? 1 PART 1: CONTEXT, VISION, OBJECTIVES AND SPATIAL STRATEGY Chapter 2 Context and Challenges 5 Sheffield: the story so far 5 Challenges for the Future 6 Other Strategies 9 Chapter 3 Vision and Objectives 13 The Spatial Vision 13 SDF Objectives 14 Chapter 4 Spatial Strategy 23 Introduction 23 Spatial Strategy 23 Overall Settlement Pattern 24 The City Centre 24 The Lower and Upper Don Valley 25 Other Employment Areas in the Main Urban Area 26 Housing Areas 26 Outer Areas 27 Green Corridors and Countryside 27 Transport Routes 28 PART
    [Show full text]
  • DVR Newsletter Final Aug 2013.Pub
    Don Valley Railway Newsletter August 2013 Special Edition HS2: Opportunities for the SheffieldHeadin City Region g Plac e your mes sage here. F or maximum i mpact, us e t wo or thr ee sent ences. Special Report: HST Phase 2 The Government views a high speed rail network from London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds as the best solution for enhancing rail capacity and performance on the key north-south rail corridors. On 28 January 2013 the Government announced its initial preferred route for Phase Two of High Speed 2 (HS2) from Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds. Meadowhall was identified as the preferred location for the Sheffield station. The alternative City Centre option of using the site of the former Victoria Station was rejected on the grounds of additional cost, longer journey times and a lower traffic output. It is anticipated that Phase One of HS2 from London to Birmingham will be opened in 2026 and Phase two, the extension of the line from Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds by 2033. City Centre Masterplan 2013 In May a six week public consultation was The Benefits of High Speed Rail started by Sheffield City Council on the City Centre Masterplan 2013. The government’s case for the need for HS2 includes: The 2013 plan sets out the Council’s latest vision for the development of Sheffield City Capacity issues on the rail network Centre over the next decade. The vision Faster rail journeys includes an increase in the number of Improved links for business people staying and spending money in the travellers city as well as developing new business Job creation and regeneration districts and improved transport links.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter from Parry People Movers Ltd January 2014 (PPML) and Pre-Metro Operations (PMOL)
    n e w s Issue No. 67 An Occasional Newsletter from Parry People Movers Ltd January 2014 (PPML) and Pre-Metro Operations (PMOL) [email protected] PHILIPPINES VILLAGE CELEBRATES ‘MIRACLE’ All credit is due to a young American STORM aid worker, Elsa Thomasma, who had become convinced of the concept of SHELTER building a storm shelter on high columns so that water-driven debris On November 8th could pass below the living 2013 Typhoon accommodation. With amazing Haiyan made persuasion and foresight, Elsa raised landfall across the $40,000 in order to build the central areas of the Cangumbang Village storm shelter, Philippines which was completed in early 2013, 6 archipelago striking Ocean surge coupled with typhoon winds destroyed everything months before the storm. the east coast with except for the storm shelter wind speeds On Nov 8th, when news reached exceeding 200 mph. The typhoon caused system, that is now being used in three Cangumbang that outlying islands had a powerful ocean surge which swept flood prone areas of Africa. been experiencing wind of extraordinary away hundreds of thousands of flimsily ferocity and sea levels had begun rising, constructed dwellings and shops, and In November, viewers of ITV main the well-drilled community ran for the also more solidly built schools evening news saw terrible scenes of High and Dry style structure in order to constructed on the flat land just above destruction from the Philippines around take shelter from the storm. As was sea level. The death toll is currently the city of Tacloban where there had intended, the inundation carrying estimated at over 6,000 with unrecorded been a complete lack of preparedness for floating debris passed beneath the numbers of serious injuries probably in the storm.
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL USER EXPRESS 31 July 2014 Welcome to This Edition of Rail User Express
    RAIL USER EXPRESS 31 July 2014 Welcome to this edition of Rail User Express. For details about group As always, feel free to forward RUEx to a colleague, or to reproduce affiliation to Railfuture, items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). If you want further see website here (from details of any of the stories mentioned, look on the relevant website or, the “Membership Type” failing that, get back to me so I can send you the full text. menu, select “RUG”). Guest Reopening Campaign Group of the Month The Somer-Rail Trust The Somer-Rail Trust is a community interest company formed in May this year with the primary objective of reinstating a regular passenger service on the mothballed railway line between Radstock and Frome using heritage diesel units. There’s disillusionment in Radstock over the lack of progress to secure the town’s regeneration - railway land is earmarked for redevelopment, and the Trust wants to see some of this land retained for railway use. They argue that a reintroduced passenger service would add value to the overall scheme and make constructive use of the remaining railway heritage, which includes a Brunel engine shed. The Trust needs to convince the regeneration company that they have widespread support for their reopening plan, and they urge anyone sharing their vision to sign up for membership of their organisation. Following an announcement about the Trust, membership secretary Terry Harris commented: “news of us is capturing the imagination and support of more and more people. This includes members with skills and know-how that can be of enormous use to us when building up our base in Radstock.
    [Show full text]