DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: British and French Relations with the Netherlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: British and French Relations with the Netherlands Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: British and French Relations with the Netherlands, 1785-1815 Graeme Edward Callister PhD University of York Department of History September 2013 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the interplay of public opinion, national identity and foreign policy during the period 1785-1815, focusing on three consistently interconnected countries: the Netherlands, France and Great Britain. The Netherlands provides the centrepiece to the study, which considers how the Dutch were perceived as a nation, a people and as a political entity, at both governmental and popular levels, in the three countries throughout the period. Public opinion is theorised as a two-part phenomenon. Active public opinion represents the collated thoughts and responses of a certain public to an event or set of circumstances. Latent public opinion represents the sum of generally-accepted underlying social norms, stereotypes or preconceptions; the perceptions and representations latently present in unconscious mentalités. The thesis examines how perceptions and representations of the Netherlands in all three countries fed into public opinion and, ultimately, into national identity either of the self or the ‘other’. It then investigates the extent to which the triangular policies of Britain, France and the various incarnations of the Dutch state were shaped by popular perceptions, identities and opinion. While active opinion is shown to have generally been of negligible importance to the policy-making process, it is argued that the underlying themes of latent opinion often provided the conceptual background that politicians from all three countries used to make policy. The influence of latent opinion was often as much unconscious as deliberate. Latent opinion was rarely the inspiration for foreign policy, but it frequently provided the boundaries of expectation within which policy was formed. 2 CONTENTS Abstract 2 Contents 3 List of Maps and Illustrations 4 Acknowledgements 5 Author’s Declaration 6 Introduction: Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, 1785-1815 8 Chapter One: France, Britain and the Netherlands, 1785-1815 49 Chapter Two: Public Opinion and National Identity in the Netherlands 80 Chapter Three: Defending the Nation: Public Opinion and National Identity 109 in Dutch Foreign Policy Chapter Four: ‘Canaux, Canards, Canaille’? French Public Opinion and the 148 Netherlands Chapter Five: Aristocrats, Democrats, Autocrats: Public Opinion, National Identity 173 and French Foreign Policy Chapter Six: Another ‘Other’: British Public Opinion, National Identity and the 209 Netherlands Chapter Seven: Behind Britannia’s Trident: Public Opinion and National Identity 235 in British Foreign Policy Conclusion 272 List of Abbreviations 286 Bibliography 287 3 LIST OF MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS William Faden, A Map of the Seven United Provinces (1789) 7 William Dent, French Liberality, or, an Attempt to Conquer the 8 World by Being too Civil by Half (1792) Philip James de Loutherbourg, The Battle of Camperdown (1799) 49 Anon., Dumouriez and the Hollander (1793) 80 J. A. le Campion, Action Entre les Patriotes et les Prussiens (c.1788) 109 Pierre-Gabriel Berthault, Entrée des Français dans la Hollande, 148 le 21 Janvier 1795 (1802) J. Kuyper, Feest der Alliantie/ Fête de l’Alliance (1796) 173 Isaac Cruikshank, A New Dutch Exercise (1793) 209 Isaac Cruikshank, The Coalition, a Scene on the Continent (1795) 233 Isaac Cruikshank, The First Articles in Requisition at Amsterdam or the 233 Sans Culotts become Touts Culotts (1795) William Holland, Dutch Embarkation, or, Needs Must When the Devil Drives!! (1804) 234 James Hill, The Dutch in the Dumps (1805) 234 Thomas Rowlandson, A Long Pull A Strong Pull and a Pull Together (1813) 235 The United Kingdom of the Netherlands, France and Britain, 1815-30 272 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my gratitude to the many people who helped with the research and writing of this thesis. First I would like to thank my supervisor, Alan Forrest, for all his help, suggestions, input and insight throughout the research and writing process. Many an idea was formulated and many an argument honed during a gentle chat over a cup of tea or coffee. I am extremely grateful for all of his assistance. I would also like to thank the members of my thesis advisory panel, Henrice Altink and Geoff Cubitt, for their useful feedback, advice and constructive criticism, which has been invaluable to this work. This PhD was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, without whom this thesis would not have been written. They have my thanks. I would also like to record my appreciation for the help that I received from the staff of the many libraries and archives that I visited for this project in Britain, France and the Netherlands. Many people have had to sit through presentations or papers culled from this thesis that I have given at conferences and seminars over the past few years; although I cannot thank everybody individually, I am deeply appreciative for the suggestions, comments and critiques that people have offered to me. I thank you all. I would equally like to show my gratitude to various friends, colleagues, peers and academics who have chatted over aspects of my thesis with me, and helped me see some of the issues with greater clarity. I am also grateful to my friend and fellow Revolutionist Amy Milka, whose research seemed to turn up more sources for my thesis than it did for her own. Finally I would like to thank my family, friends and Rach for their support over the past few years. 5 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION This thesis is entirely my own work. It has not been submitted for examination elsewhere and all references to work by any other author are clearly cited. Some of the research from this thesis has already appeared in a different form in the following article: Graeme Callister, ‘The City and the Revolutionary Dutch Nation, 1780-1800’, Dutch Crossing: Journal of Low Countries Studies, Volume 36, No. 3 (November 2012), 228-43. 6 William Faden, A Map of the Seven United Provinces (1789) (Image courtesy of Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal) 7 INTRODUCTION: PUBLIC OPINION AND FOREIGN POLICY, 1785-1815 William Dent, French Liberality (1792) (British Museum Satires 8136: © Trustees of the British Museum) 8 The history of the Netherlands in the eighteenth century is tightly bound to that of France and Great Britain. The three near-neighbours had long been connected through diplomacy, trade, continental and colonial rivalries, and even through governments, a situation perhaps most clearly outlined in 1688 when a Dutchman bearing a French title ascended the throne of England.1 A tripartite relationship that came close to equality at the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 evolved until the Netherlands ranked far below the other powers in terms of international influence as the eighteenth century drew to a close. The final year of the century saw the armies of Britain and France come to blows on the territory of their weakened neighbour. The Netherlands had long held a place in Anglo-French rivalry. Annie Jourdan asserted that it had been the ‘pomme de discorde’ between France and Britain for over 150 years.2 Both powers saw the Netherlands as key to their security and prosperity, and both liked to think of it metaphorically as their own. Edmund Burke called the Netherlands ‘as necessary a part of this country as Kent’;3 Napoleon famously announced that it was no more than ‘an emanation’ of France.4 The fate of the Netherlands was one of the major issues in the contest between Britain and France in the period 1785-1815. Britain remained committed to freeing the Netherlands from French influence, while France continued to see her presence in the Netherlands as the only way of keeping the Dutch from the British yoke. The fate of the Netherlands was among the principal causes of war in 1793 and 1803, and the settlement of the Netherlands in 1814 was a top priority to London. Britain committed substantial forces to fight in the Netherlands five times between France’s declaration of war in 1793 and Battle of Waterloo in 1815. For France, the period of war with Britain was bookended by two failed invasions of the Netherlands, sandwiching the conquest of 1795 and subsequent almost continuous military occupation until the collapse of French control in 1813. The Netherlands itself has received little attention in international histories of this period. Many narrative histories portray the Dutch as passive actors, and some barely mention the 1 The Principality of Orange, from which the Princes of Orange got their title, is in southern France. Herbert H. Rowen, The Princes of Orange, the Stadholders in the Dutch Republic (Cambridge, 1988), p.8. Also James Jones, ‘French Intervention in English and Dutch Politics, 1677-88’, in Jeremy Black (ed.), Knights Errant and True Englishmen: British Foreign Policy, 1660-1800 (Edinburgh, 1989), 1-23. 2 Annie Jourdan, ‘Les Gaulois en Batavie: des Relations Diplomatiques Machiavéliques’, in Annie Jourdan & Joep Leerssen (eds.), Remous Révolutionnaires: République Batave, Armée Française (Amsterdam, 1996), p.92. 3 Boyd Hilton, A Mad, Bad and Dangerous People? England 1783-1846 (Oxford, 2006), p.67. 4 Journal de l’Empire, 18 June 1811. 9 Netherlands at all.5 The major characters in the drama of north-western Europe and its colonial outposts are Britain and France; the Netherlands is explored only as a backdrop, context to the situation, or a conduit for the rivalry between the two greater powers. Even the Patriot upheavals of the 1780s were for a long time interpreted as a proxy conflict between French-backed Patriots and Anglo-Prussian-backed Orangists.6 Although the idea of primary Dutch agency in the Patriot years has been somewhat rehabilitated,7 the latter two decades of this period are widely accepted as having been a time of the French, with the Dutch relegated further to a small part of a much larger whole.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life Under Pressure: Questions for a Comparative History of Economy and Demography in France and England, 1670-1870
    Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Discussion Papers Economic Growth Center 5-1-1982 Life Under Pressure: Questions for a Comparative History of Economy and Demography in France and England, 1670-1870 David R. Weir Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/egcenter-discussion-paper-series Recommended Citation Weir, David R., "Life Under Pressure: Questions for a Comparative History of Economy and Demography in France and England, 1670-1870" (1982). Discussion Papers. 415. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/egcenter-discussion-paper-series/415 This Discussion Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Economic Growth Center at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Discussion Papers by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ECONOMIC GROWTH CENTER YALE UNIVERSITY Box 1987, Yale Station New Haven, Connecticut CENTER DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 407 LIFE UNDER PRESSURE: QUESTIONS FOR A COMPARATIVE HISTORY OF ECONOMY AND DEMOGRAPHY IN FRANCE AND ENGLAND, 1670-1870 David R. Weir May 1982 Notes: An earlier draft of this paper was presented to the Conference on British Demographic History at Asilomar, California in March, 1982. Helpful comments from Ron Lee, T. Paul Schultz, Susan Watkins and other Conference participants are gratefully acknowledged. Center Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to Discussion Papers ~hould be cleared with the author to protect the tentative character of these papers.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution
    1. HISTORY (Class IX, Chapter 1 and 2) The French Revolution The French Society during the Late 18th Century In 1774, Louis XVI, a 20 year young from Bourbon dynasty ascended the throne of France. He was welcomed by empty treasure. France was reeling under a tremendous debt which had mounted Up to 2 billion lives.For meeting these expenses increase in the tax was inevitable. The French Society was divided into three estates. First, two enjoyed all privileges. 1st Estate: Clergy 2nd Estate: Nobility 3rd Estate: Big businessmen, merchants, court officials, peasants, artisans, landless laborers, servants, etc. Some within the Third Estate were rich and some were poor. The burden of financing activities of the state through taxes was borne by the Third Estate alone. The Struggle for Survival: Population of France grew and so did the demand for grain. The gap between the rich and poor widened. This led to subsistence crises. Subsistence Crisis: An extreme situation where the basic means of livelihood are endangered. The Growing Middle Class: The 18th century witnessed the emergence of the middle class which was educated and believed that no group in society should be privileged by birth. These ideas were put forward by philosophers such as Locke the English philosopher and Rousseau, French philosopher. The American constitution and its guarantee of individual rights was an important example of political theories of France. These ideas were discussed intensively in salons and coffee houses and spread among people through books and newspapers. These were even read aloud. THE OUTBREAK OF THE REVOLUTION The French Revolution went through various stages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Nineteenth- Century Britain
    A COMPANION TO NINETEENTH- CENTURY BRITAIN Edited by Chris Williams A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Britain A COMPANION TO NINETEENTH- CENTURY BRITAIN Edited by Chris Williams © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 108, Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Chris Williams to be identified as the Author of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A companion to nineteenth-century Britain / edited by Chris Williams. p. cm. – (Blackwell companions to British history) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-631-22579-X (alk. paper) 1. Great Britain – History – 19th century – Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Great Britain – Civilization – 19th century – Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Williams, Chris, 1963– II. Title. III. Series. DA530.C76 2004 941.081 – dc22 2003021511 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 10 on 12 pt Galliard by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd., Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International For further information on Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO BRITISH HISTORY Published in association with The Historical Association This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of the scholarship that has shaped our current understanding of British history.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago During the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933 Samuel C. King Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Recommended Citation King, S. C.(2019). Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5418 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933 by Samuel C. King Bachelor of Arts New York University, 2012 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Lauren Sklaroff, Major Professor Mark Smith, Committee Member David S. Shields, Committee Member Erica J. Peters, Committee Member Yulian Wu, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Abstract The central aim of this project is to describe and explicate the process by which the status of Chinese restaurants in the United States underwent a dramatic and complete reversal in American consumer culture between the 1890s and the 1930s. In pursuit of this aim, this research demonstrates the connection that historically existed between restaurants, race, immigration, and foreign affairs during the Chinese Exclusion era.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870
    The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Dzanic, Dzavid. 2016. The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33840734 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 A dissertation presented by Dzavid Dzanic to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2016 © 2016 - Dzavid Dzanic All rights reserved. Advisor: David Armitage Author: Dzavid Dzanic The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 Abstract This dissertation examines the religious, diplomatic, legal, and intellectual history of French imperialism in Italy, Egypt, and Algeria between the 1789 French Revolution and the beginning of the French Third Republic in 1870. In examining the wider logic of French imperial expansion around the Mediterranean, this dissertation bridges the Revolutionary, Napoleonic, Restoration (1815-30), July Monarchy (1830-48), Second Republic (1848-52), and Second Empire (1852-70) periods. Moreover, this study represents the first comprehensive study of interactions between imperial officers and local actors around the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science 279/479 War and the Nation-State
    Political Science 279/479 War and the Nation-State Hein Goemans Course Information: Harkness 320 Fall 2010 Office Hours: Monday 4{5 Thursday 16:50{19:30 [email protected] Harkness 329 This course examines the development of warfare and growth of the state. In particular, we examine the phenomenon of war in its broader socio-economic context between the emergence of the modern nation-state and the end of World War II. Students are required to do all the reading. Student are required to make a group presentation in class on the readings for one class (25% of the grade), and there will be one big final (75%). Course Requirements Participation and a presentation in the seminar comprises 25% of your grade. A final exam counts for 75%. The final exam is given during the period scheduled by the University. In particular instances, students may substitute a serious research paper for the final. Students interested in the research paper option should approach me no later than one week after the mid-term. Academic Integrity Be familiar with the University's policies on academic integrity and disciplinary action (http://www.rochester.edu/living/urhere/handbook/discipline2.html#XII). Vi- olators of University regulations on academic integrity will be dealt with severely, which means that your grade will suffer, and I will forward your case to the Chair of the College Board on Academic Honesty. The World Wide Web A number of websites will prove useful: 1. General History of the 20th Century • http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/ • http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/20centry.htm • http://www.fsmitha.com/ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing an Empire, Losing a Role?: the Commonwealth Vision, British Identity, and African Decolonization, 1959-1963
    LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 By Emily Lowrance-Floyd Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey . Dr. Katherine Clark . Dr. Dorice Williams Elliott . Dr. Elizabeth MacGonagle . Dr. Leslie Tuttle Date Defended: April 6, 2012 ii The Dissertation Committee for Emily Lowrance-Floyd certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 . Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey Date approved: April 6, 2012 iii ABSTRACT Many observers of British national identity assume that decolonization presaged a crisis in the meaning of Britishness. The rise of the new imperial history, which contends Empire was central to Britishness, has only strengthened faith in this assumption, yet few historians have explored the actual connections between end of empire and British national identity. This project examines just this assumption by studying the final moments of decolonization in Africa between 1959 and 1963. Debates in the popular political culture and media demonstrate the extent to which British identity and meanings of Britishness on the world stage intertwined with the process of decolonization. A discursive tradition characterized as the “Whiggish vision,” in the words of historian Wm. Roger Louis, emerged most pronounced in this era. This vision, developed over the centuries of Britain imagining its Empire, posited that the British Empire was a benign, liberalizing force in the world and forecasted a teleology in which Empire would peacefully transform into a free, associative Commonwealth of Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Synarchy Movement of Empire (Iclc Draft Document)
    SYNARCHY MOVEMENT OF EMPIRE (ICLC DRAFT DOCUMENT) BOOK I *********************************************** THE EARLY SYNARCHY MOVEMENT OF EMPIRE ************************************** THE FRENCH REVOLUTION of 1789-1815: A SYNARCHIST INTERNATIONAL EXERCISE IN PURGATIVE VIOLENCE ************************** by Pierre Beaudry LEESBURG VIRGINIA, JUNE 2005 1 DEDICATION. This book is dedicated to the LaRouche Youth Movement (LYM) worldwide, and particularly to the French LYM, who deserve to know the truth about French history and world affairs. Previous generations of French citizens had settled their accounts with their immediate past history by either going to war, or by getting involved into absurd coups d'Etat, however, they never knew why they were doing so. My generation of Bohemian Bourgeois (BoBos) has not done that; it didn't care to do anything for history, nor for the future generations. It was only interested in lying and in taking care of "Me, Me, Me!" The problem that the youth of today are face with is that the truth about the French Revolution, about Napoleon Bonaparte, about the synarchy, about the destruction of the Third Republic, or about Vichy fascism, has never been told. So, either the truth comes out now, and finally exorcises the French population as a whole, once and forever, or else the French nation is doomed to repeat the same mistakes of the past, again and again. 2 BEASTMAN BONAPARTE 3 SYNARCHY MOVEMENT OF EMPIRE (ICLC DRAFT DOCUMENT) BOOK I *********************************************** THE EARLY SYNARCHY MOVEMENT OF EMPIRE ************************************** THE FRENCH REVOLUTION of 1789-1815: A SYNARCHIST INTERNATIONAL EXERCISE IN PURGATIVE VIOLENCE ************************** 1.1 THE ORIGINAL MARTINIST CULT OF LYON . ………………………………18 1.2 INTRODUCTION 2.2 RELIGIOUS FANATICISM OF THE MARTINIST CULT 3.2 THE GNOSTIC HERESY AND THE MARTINIST SYNARCHY 4.2 THE CATHARS 5.2 WHAT IS MARTINISM? 6.2 THE CHARACTERISTIC OF LOUIS-CLAUDE DE SAINT-MARTIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace of Paris (1783) 1 Peace of Paris (1783)
    Peace of Paris (1783) 1 Peace of Paris (1783) The Peace of Paris (1783) was the set of treaties which ended the American Revolutionary War. On 3 September 1783, representatives of King George III of Great Britain signed a treaty in Paris with representatives of the United States of America—commonly known as the Treaty of Paris (1783)—and two treaties at Versailles with representatives of King Louis XVI of France and King Charles III of Spain—commonly known as the Treaties of Versailles (1783). The previous day, a preliminary treaty had been signed with representatives of the States General of the Dutch Republic, but the final treaty which ended the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War was not signed until 20 May 1784; for convenience, however, it is included in the summaries below. The British lost their Thirteen Colonies and the defeat marked the end of the First British Empire. The United States gained more than it expected, thanks to the award of western territory.[1] The other Allies had mixed-to-poor results. France won a propaganda victory over Britain after its defeat in the Seven Years War, however its material gains were minimal and its financial losses huge. It was already in financial trouble and its borrowing to pay for the war used up all its credit and created the financial disasters that marked the 1780s. Historians link those disasters to the coming of the French Revolution. The Dutch did not gain anything of significant value at the end of the war. The Spanish had a mixed result; they did not achieve their primary war goal of recovering Gibraltar, but they did gain some territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Books Added to Benner Library from Estate of Dr. William Foote
    Books added to Benner Library from estate of Dr. William Foote # CALL NUMBER TITLE Scribes and scholars : a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature / by L.D. Reynolds and N.G. 1 001.2 R335s, 1991 Wilson. 2 001.2 Se15e Emerson on the scholar / Merton M. Sealts, Jr. 3 001.3 R921f Future without a past : the humanities in a technological society / John Paul Russo. 4 001.30711 G163a Academic instincts / Marjorie Garber. Book of the book : some works & projections about the book & writing / edited by Jerome Rothenberg and 5 002 B644r Steven Clay. 6 002 OL5s Smithsonian book of books / Michael Olmert. 7 002 T361g Great books and book collectors / Alan G. Thomas. 8 002.075 B29g Gentle madness : bibliophiles, bibliomanes, and the eternal passion for books / Nicholas A. Basbanes. 9 002.09 B29p Patience & fortitude : a roving chronicle of book people, book places, and book culture / Nicholas A. Basbanes. Books of the brave : being an account of books and of men in the Spanish Conquest and settlement of the 10 002.098 L552b sixteenth-century New World / Irving A. Leonard ; with a new introduction by Rolena Adorno. 11 020.973 R824f Foundations of library and information science / Richard E. Rubin. 12 021.009 J631h, 1976 History of libraries in the Western World / by Elmer D. Johnson and Michael H. Harris. 13 025.2832 B175d Double fold : libraries and the assault on paper / Nicholson Baker. London booksellers and American customers : transatlantic literary community and the Charleston Library 14 027.2 R196L Society, 1748-1811 / James Raven.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Jaar Na Het Bezoek Van Napoleon Aan Kennemerland
    1811-2011 200 jaar na het bezoek van Napoleon aan Kennemerland door A. van Oosterom k ben buitengewoon in mijn Schik met Nederland. De mensen herinneren zich hun onafhan- “Ikelijkheid alleen nog maar om des te beter de voordelen van de hereniging te voelen en daarin een uniformiteit van wetten, een gematigd stelsel van bijdragen en een geregeld verloop van zaken te ontdekken. Ze zijn meer Frans dan enig ander volk van de herenigde landen”.1, p. 708 Dit schreef keizer Napoleon Bonaparte van Frankrijk ( 1769-1821) vanuit Amsterdam aan zijn aangenomen zoon Eugène de Beauharnais, een van de twee kinderen van zijn ex-vrouw Joséphine de Beauharnais. Hij schreef dit tijdens het bezoek dat hij samen met zijn tweede echtgenote keizerin Marie Louise van Oostenrijk in september en oktober 1811 aan ons land bracht. Een jaar eerder had hij Nederland ingelijfd bij zijn keizerrijk. En nu volgde een kennismakingsbezoek met vooral het karakter van een inspectietocht. Overigens noteert Schama1, p. 707 bij deze briefpassage: “het was niet de eerste keer in zijn loopbaan dat de keizer een knieval verwarde met een enthousiaste begroeting “. Voor de bewoners van Kennemerland is die tocht alleen al daarom –en misschien juist daarom– gedenkwaardig, omdat Napoleon, toen op het toppunt van zijn macht, ook dit deel van ons land met een bezoek vereerde. Beverwijk en Velsen ontvingen hem daarbij op de voorgeschreven wijze, waartoe onder andere het luiden van de kerkklokken behoorde zodra hij de gemeentegrens passeerde.2, p. 52 In deze bijdrage zal aan dit bezoek aan Kennemerland aandacht worden besteed, maar dan wel in een ruime context van eraan voorafgaande gebeurtenissen, zowel in ons land als ook in Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • French Historical Studies Style Sheet
    The French Historical Studies Style Guide comprises three parts: (1) a style sheet listing elements of style and format particular to the journal; (2) starting on page 6 of this guide, the Duke University Press Journals Style Guide, which offers general rules for DUP journals based on The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. (CMS); and (3) starting on page 12, an explanation with examples of the journal’s format for citations and reference list or bibliography. French Historical Studies Style Sheet ABBREVIATIONS In citations and in reference lists the names of the months are given as follows: Jan., Feb., Mar., Apr., May, June, July, Aug., Sept., Oct., Nov., Dec. ABSTRACTS For every article (but not for review articles or contributions to a forum), an abstract must be provided in both English and French, with both an English and a French title. Neither version of the abstract should exceed 150 words. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments, headed “Acknowledgments,” appear at the end of the article’s text and are written in the third person. The author thanks the anonymous reviewers of French Historical Studies, whose suggestions were inspirational and invaluable. EPIGRAPHS An epigraph, which may appear at the start of an article or a section, has an attribution that includes the author’s name or the author’s name and the work’s title. No other bibliographical information is required, and the source is not included in the references list unless it is cited elsewhere in the text. No footnote should be attached to an epigraph. I propose that the figurations of women to be found within Rousseau’s texts are constitutive of the organization of public and domestic life in the post-revolutionary world of bourgeois propriety.
    [Show full text]