Slime Molds & Fungi of the J.J. Collett Natural Area, Alberta – 7 March 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Slime Molds & Fungi of the J.J. Collett Natural Area, Alberta – 7 March 2018 SLIME MOLDS & FUNGI OF THE J.J. COLLETT NATURAL AREA, ALBERTA Report prepared for Alberta Environment and Parks Charles Durham Bird, Box 22, Erskine, AB, T0C 1G0; [email protected] March 7, 2018 The Area Aerial photograph and Trail Map of the Natural Area The J.J. Collett Provincial Natural Area is located in rural central Alberta near the hamlet of Morningside. It consists of 635 acres of Aspen Parkland underlain by ancient sand dunes. Over 18 km of maintained trails wind through a mosaic of shrub lands, aspen groves, stands of white spruce on moist shady hillsides, wetlands and grassy meadows typical of the area. 1 White spruce woods on Trail 4 “Before 1974, the area presently known as the J. J. Collett Natural Area was privately owned and the site of logging and mill operation and pasture grazing. The marsh in the northeast corner was drained by an adjacent landowner. In 1974, 240 ha (600 acres) were purchased by the Alberta Department of Environment in trust that the area would be used for environmental education (NAP 1987). In 1975, a protected reservation was applied to the area and administration was transferred to Alberta Energy and Natural Resources. Ducks Unlimited Canada was granted a license in 1976 to construct a water control structure in an attempt to reestablish the drained marsh in the northeast corner of the natural area. Most of the area was designated a provincial natural area in 1976 by an Order in Council (OC 653/76). In 1982, an additional 16.2 ha (40 acres) were obtained and placed under protective notation (PNT 820462). In the same year, a pipeline right-of-way was granted to Northwestern Utilities Ltd. The J. J. Collett Foundation was incorporated in 1985 in order to manage the site.” (K. Timoney & A. Robinson, 2009). The Lepidoptera of the area have been studied by the author from 2002-2013 and the results are listed in Bird 2012 and 2013. PROVINCIAL PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS ARE IMPORTANT Ninety five percent of the native habitats in the Aspen Parkland of Alberta have been lost. More habitat loss will occur unless steps are taken to prevent this from happening. It is important to remember that various rare, or even endangered species, occur in these habitats and their existence is threatened if further habitat loss occurs. Provincial Parks and other areas where natural vegetation is protected are of great value as the flora and fauna present in them are typical of what was in Alberta before widespread agricultural, petroleum and logging activities, as well as urban expansion, replaced them with “weedy” species and those associated with cultivated grains and hay crops. As a result, many of Alberta’s “rare and endangered” species are now found only, or mainly, in such protected areas. 2 THE WEBSITE FOR THE AREA The Natural Area has an extremely good website - http://www.jjcollett.com/. Included in it are checklists of the Fungi, Lichens, Bryophytes and Vascular Plants as well as ones dealing with various animal, bird and insect groups. There are also many excellent photographs in a series of Galleries. IDENTIFICATION AIDS The following books have been especially helpful for identification. Arora, D. 1986. Mushrooms demystified. Ten Speed Press. 959 pp. Ginns, J. 2017. Polypores of British Columbia (Fungi, Basidiomycota). Prov. B.C., Victoria, Tech. Report 104. 260 pp. Lincoff, G. & C. Nehring. 1981. The Audubon Society Field Guide to the North American Mushrooms. Chanticleer Press. Miller, O.K. & H.H. Miller. 2006. North American Mushrooms, a field guide to Edible and Inedible fungi. Falcon Guides. 584 pp. Phillips, R. 2010. Mushrooms and Other Fungi of North America. Firefly Books. 384 pp. Schalkwijk-Barendsen, H.M.E., 1994. Mushrooms of Northwest North America. Lone Pine. 414 pp. Help was also obtained from the downloadable resource Matchmaker (http://www.svims.ca/council/matchmaker.htm), Mycokey 4.1 and from http://mushroomobserver.org/. PRECAUTIONS Identifications have been made by comparison with illustrations and information available in the literature. Herbarium specimens have not always been collected. Some spore prints were made but spores have seldom been examined with a compound microscope. Readers should be aware that one can do only so much with photographs and that more detailed examination of a specimen may result in a different species name. Also, one should realize that not all of the local species are covered in the abovementioned literature and that a listing of all of the fungi known for Alberta has yet to be put together. The Alberta Mycological Society has, however, been working on a database of known collections and observations. A paper by P. Kroeger and S. M. Berch, published in 2017, titled “Macrofungus species of British Columbia” (Prov. B.C., Victoria, B.C. Tech. Rep. 68) lists over 3000 species. While Alberta cannot be expected to have nearly as many species as British Columbia it is obvious that new discoveries remain to be made and that certain genera like Cortinarius, Russula and Ramaria require further study. Taxonomic work is still needed in various groups and some current species concepts may change. DNA sequencing studies, in particular, may lead to the naming of new species or the realignment of species within Families or even Orders. Henry Beker and his group recently made a major revision of the genus Hebeloma in Europe and are now turning their attention to North America. PRESENCE OR ABSENCE AND SEASONAL VARIATION The presence or absence of most mushrooms depends to a large extent on soil moisture. When levels are high, mushrooms are reasonably common from spring to fall. Fewer mushrooms show up in the spring and early summer if soil moisture levels are low, for example, morels show up only in years with high spring moisture levels. Similarly, mushrooms are scarce in the late summer and fall if soil moisture levels are low. The latter was true in 2017. 3 SPECIES LIST Numbers in year, month, date and image order refer to photographs taken by Charles Bird; those in bold are in the Fungi Gallery of the J.J. Collett website (http://www.jjcollett.com/); numbers preceded by BIRD refer to voucher specimens in the author’s Herbarium. The latter will eventually be placed in a major public Herbarium, possibly at the University of Alberta. The scientific names used in older publications are often out-of-date because of more recent research. The most up-to-date names can be found in Index Fungorum and those are the ones that are used herein. MYXOMYCETES (Slime Molds) Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa (Coral Slime Mold) – 20140823-5; 20150725-12; 20160827-8. Fuligo leviderma (Fuligo Slime Mold) – 20140927-3 & 3a; 20140927-8, 8a & 8b; 20150829-1; 20160827-11 & 11a. Leocarpus fragilis (Egg-shell Slime Mold) – 20131006-22 & 23. Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa Lycogala epidendrum Lycogala epidendrum (Wolf’s Milk Slime Mold) – 20140830-29; 20140906-7; 20140920-9; 20140927-6, 20150829-14; 20160702-3; 20160827-1; 20160903-1. FUNGI ASCOMYCOTA Apiosporina collinsii (Black leaf or Witch’s broom of Saskatoon) – 20141011-16. A. morbosa (Black Knot) – 20120922-14. Bisporella citrina (Lemon Disc Fungus) – 20130831-8; 20150829-14. Chlorociboria aeruginascens (Emerald Cup or Green Stain Fungus) – 20131006-24. Discina perlata (Pig’s Ears) – 20130831-7. Entoleuca mammata (Hypoxylon mammatum) (Hypoxylon Canker of Aspen) – seen but not photographed or collected. Exophiala (Caliciopsis) calicioides – 20130511-4, 5 & 5a; BIRD37626, 20171202-1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6. Humaria hemisphaerica (Hairy Brown Cup) – 20140614-9; 20140621-6 & 7. 4 Discina perlata Humaria hemisphaerica Morchella elata (angusticeps) (Black Morel) – 20160514-13; BIRD37190, 20170521-7 & 7a. Nectria cinnabarina (Coral Spot Canker) – 20160319-2; BIRD36810, 20160409-10; 20160521-1. Neobulgaria pura (Jelly Disc) – 20150613-11 & 11a. Otidea alutacea (Ear-like Fungus) – 20140614-6; 20140621-7; BIRD36598, 20150613-9 & 9a; 20150620-3. O. onotica (Donkey Ears or Orange Otidea) – 20140614-9. Peziza repanda (Brown Cup) – BIRD36901, 20160702-4. Phragmidium potentillae (rust on Potentilla anserina) – BIRD37031, 20160820-4 & 4a. Ptychoverpa bohemica (Wrinkled or Early Morel) – 20140607-1; 20150504-2, 3, 4 & 5. Morchella elata Ptychoverpa bohemica Rhytidiella baranyayi (False Chaga) – 20160227-6. Rust on Thalictrum venulosum – 20160620-3. Sclerencoelia (Encoelia) pruinosa (Sooty-bark Canker of Aspen) – BIRD37170, 20170401-2, 2a & 2b. Scutellinia scutellata (Eyelash Cup) – 20131006-21; 20160827-7. BASIDIOMYCOTA Agaricales Agaricus arvensis (Horse Mushroom) – 20160702-1 & 1a; 20160709-1 & 1a. A. augustus (The Prince) – 20150704-9, 9a & 9b; 20150718-5 & 5a; 20150829-16 & 16a. 5 A. silvicola (Wood Agaricus) – 20120908-9 & 10; 20140830-16 & 16a; 20140830-17; 20140830-23 & 23a; 20140906-17 & 17a; 20150725-1 & 1a; 20150725-7 & 7a; 20150725-10, 10a & 10b; 20150822-17 & 17a; 20150829-8, 20150829-8a, 20150829-9, 20150829-9a; 20150829-16 & 16a; 20160820-1, 1a & 1b; 20160827-13, 13a & 13b; 20160910-6 & 6a; 20160924-5 & 5a. Agrocybe praecox (Spring Agrocybe) – BIRD36919, 20160709-10 & 10a. Amanita muscaria (Fly Agaric) – 20150822-1; 20160820-17 & 17a. A. vaginata (Grisette) – BIRD36977, 20160730-4 & 4a; 20160820-11 & 11a; 20160827-16 & 16a. Armillaria mellea (Honey Mushroom) – 20110910-4 & 5; 20120908-11; 20120922-20; 20140928-7 & 7a; 20150822-5 & 5a; 20150822-6 & 6a; 20150822-9 & 9a; 20150822-11 & 11a; 20150822-16 & 16a; 20150822-21, 21a & 21b; 20150912-3, 3a & 3b; 20150912-15 & 15a; 20150912-16, 16a & 16b; 20150912-19 & 19a; 20150919-5 & 5a; BIRD37112, 20160924-2, 2a, 2b & 2c. Aspropaxillus (Leucopaxillus) septentrionalis – BIRD36968, 20160723-8, 8a & 8b. Baeospora myriadophylla (Lavender Baeospora) – 20140906-1; 20160716-7, 20160716-7a, BIRD36986. Bovista plumbea (Lead-colored Puffball) – 20120908-12; 20130511-2; 20140906-18; 20160716-5 & 5a; 20160723-4 & 4a; 20160723-9, 9a & 9b. Bovista plumbea Calvatia booniana Calvatia booniana (Giant Western Puffball) – 20140830-37 & 37a. Cantharellula umbonata (Grayling) – BIRD37060, 20160827-15 & 15a. Chrysomphalina chrysophylla (Golden-gilled Mushroom) – 20140913-4 & 4a; 20140913-10 & 10a.
Recommended publications
  • Micolucus 5 2018
    MICOLUCUS • SOCIEDADE MICOLÓXICA LUCUS NÚMERO 5 • ANO 2018 NÚME R O 5•ANO2018 Limiar .............................................................................................. 1 é unha publicación da Sociedade Micolóxica Lucus, Biodiversidade fúnxica da Reserva da Biosfera Terras do Miño: CIF: G27272954 Lentinellus tridentinus. Depósito Legal: LU 140-2014 JOSE CASTRO................................................................................... 2 ISSN edición impresa: 2386-8872 ISSN edición dixital: 2387-1822 Aportaciones al conocimiento de la micobiota de la Sierra de O Courel (Lugo, España): REDACCIÓN E COORDINACIÓN: Donadinia helvelloides JULIÁN ALONSO DÍAZ...................................................................... 9 Julián Alonso Díaz Jose Castro Ferreiro Descripción de cuatro especies interesantes para la Benito Martínez Lobato micoflora de Galicia. Juan Antonio Martínez Fidalgo JOSÉ MANUEL CASTRO MARCOTE, JOSÉ MARÍA COSTA LAGO ..... 19 Alfonso Vázquez Fraga José Manuel Fernández Díaz Hongos hipogeos de la provincia de Lugo: Tuber foetidum. Cristina Gayo Cancelas JOSE CASTRO, JULIÁN ALONSO, ALFONSO VÁZQUEZ ................... 31 Jesús Javier Varela Quintas Howard Fox Fomitopsis iberica, un políporo agente de pudrición marrón. • Os artigos remitidos a SANTIAGO CORRAL ESTÉVEZ, JOSÉ MARÍA COSTA LAGO ............. 38 son revisados por asesores externos antes de ser Estudos sobre a micobiota folícola da Reserva da Biosfera aceptados ou rexeitados. Terras do Miño I: Chloroscypha chloromela. JOSE CASTRO ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolites from Nematophagous Fungi and Nematicidal Natural Products from Fungi As Alternatives for Biological Control
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2016) 100:3813–3824 DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-7234-5 MINI-REVIEW Metabolites from nematophagous fungi and nematicidal natural products from fungi as alternatives for biological control. Part II: metabolites from nematophagous basidiomycetes and non-nematophagous fungi Thomas Degenkolb1 & Andreas Vilcinskas1,2 Received: 4 October 2015 /Revised: 29 November 2015 /Accepted: 2 December 2015 /Published online: 4 January 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract In this second section of a two-part mini-re- Introduction view article, we introduce 101 further nematicidal and non-nematicidal secondary metabolites biosynthesized Metabolites from nematophagous basidiomycetes by nematophagous basidiomycetes or non- nematophagous ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. Sev- General remarks eral of these compounds have promising nematicidal activity and deserve further and more detailed analy- The chemical ecology of nematophagous fungi is still far from sis. Thermolides A and B, omphalotins, ophiobolins, understood. Little has been done to screen for metabolites in bursaphelocides A and B, illinitone A, pseudohalonectrins A nematophagous fungi, or nematicidal metabolites in other fun- and B, dichomitin B, and caryopsomycins A–Careex- gi, since the pioneering studies by Stadler and colleagues pub- cellent candidates or lead compounds for the develop- lished in the 1990s (Stadler et al. 1993a, b, 1994a, b, c, d). In ment of biocontrol strategies for phytopathogenic the first part of this review, we discussed 83 primary and nematodes. Paraherquamides, clonostachydiol, and secondary metabolites from nematophagous ascomycetes nafuredins offer promising leads for the development (Degenkolb and Vilcinskas, in press). In this second install- of formulations against the intestinal nematodes of ment, we consider nematicidal metabolites from ruminants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi
    A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macrofungi Checklist of Liguria (Italy): the Current Status of Surveys
    Posted November 2008. Summary published in MYCOTAXON 105: 167–170. 2008. The macrofungi checklist of Liguria (Italy): the current status of surveys MIRCA ZOTTI1*, ALFREDO VIZZINI 2, MIDO TRAVERSO3, FABRIZIO BOCCARDO4, MARIO PAVARINO1 & MAURO GIORGIO MARIOTTI1 *[email protected] 1DIP.TE.RIS - Università di Genova - Polo Botanico “Hanbury”, Corso Dogali 1/M, I16136 Genova, Italy 2 MUT- Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Viale Mattioli 25, I10125 Torino, Italy 3Via San Marino 111/16, I16127 Genova, Italy 4Via F. Bettini 14/11, I16162 Genova, Italy Abstract— The paper is aimed at integrating and updating the first edition of the checklist of Ligurian macrofungi. Data are related to mycological researches carried out mainly in some holm-oak woods through last three years. The new taxa collected amount to 172: 15 of them belonging to Ascomycota and 157 to Basidiomycota. It should be highlighted that 12 taxa have been recorded for the first time in Italy and many species are considered rare or infrequent. Each taxa reported consists of the following items: Latin name, author, habitat, height, and the WGS-84 Global Position System (GPS) coordinates. This work, together with the original Ligurian checklist, represents a contribution to the national checklist. Key words—mycological flora, new reports Introduction Liguria represents a very interesting region from a mycological point of view: macrofungi, directly and not directly correlated to vegetation, are frequent, abundant and quite well distributed among the species. This topic is faced and discussed in Zotti & Orsino (2001). Observations prove an high level of fungal biodiversity (sometimes called “mycodiversity”) since Liguria, though covering only about 2% of the Italian territory, shows more than 36 % of all the species recorded in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • 80130Dimou7-107Weblist Changed
    Posted June, 2008. Summary published in Mycotaxon 104: 39–42. 2008. Mycodiversity studies in selected ecosystems of Greece: IV. Macrofungi from Abies cephalonica forests and other intermixed tree species (Oxya Mt., central Greece) 1 2 1 D.M. DIMOU *, G.I. ZERVAKIS & E. POLEMIS * [email protected] 1Agricultural University of Athens, Lab. of General & Agricultural Microbiology, Iera Odos 75, GR-11855 Athens, Greece 2 [email protected] National Agricultural Research Foundation, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Lakonikis 87, GR-24100 Kalamata, Greece Abstract — In the course of a nine-year inventory in Mt. Oxya (central Greece) fir forests, a total of 358 taxa of macromycetes, belonging in 149 genera, have been recorded. Ninety eight taxa constitute new records, and five of them are first reports for the respective genera (Athelopsis, Crustoderma, Lentaria, Protodontia, Urnula). One hundred and one records for habitat/host/substrate are new for Greece, while some of these associations are reported for the first time in literature. Key words — biodiversity, macromycetes, fir, Mediterranean region, mushrooms Introduction The mycobiota of Greece was until recently poorly investigated since very few mycologists were active in the fields of fungal biodiversity, taxonomy and systematic. Until the end of ’90s, less than 1.000 species of macromycetes occurring in Greece had been reported by Greek and foreign researchers. Practically no collaboration existed between the scientific community and the rather few amateurs, who were active in this domain, and thus useful information that could be accumulated remained unexploited. Until then, published data were fragmentary in spatial, temporal and ecological terms. The authors introduced a different concept in their methodology, which was based on a long-term investigation of selected ecosystems and monitoring-inventorying of macrofungi throughout the year and for a period of usually 5-8 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Angiocarpous Representatives of the Russulaceae in Tropical South East Asia
    Persoonia 32, 2014: 13–24 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158514X679119 Tales of the unexpected: angiocarpous representatives of the Russulaceae in tropical South East Asia A. Verbeken1, D. Stubbe1,2, K. van de Putte1, U. Eberhardt³, J. Nuytinck1,4 Key words Abstract Six new sequestrate Lactarius species are described from tropical forests in South East Asia. Extensive macro- and microscopical descriptions and illustrations of the main anatomical features are provided. Similarities Arcangeliella with other sequestrate Russulales and their phylogenetic relationships are discussed. The placement of the species gasteroid fungi within Lactarius and its subgenera is confirmed by a molecular phylogeny based on ITS, LSU and rpb2 markers. hypogeous fungi A species key of the new taxa, including five other known angiocarpous species from South East Asia reported to Lactarius exude milk, is given. The diversity of angiocarpous fungi in tropical areas is considered underestimated and driving Martellia evolutionary forces towards gasteromycetization are probably more diverse than generally assumed. The discovery morphology of a large diversity of angiocarpous milkcaps on a rather local tropical scale was unexpected, and especially the phylogeny fact that in Sri Lanka more angiocarpous than agaricoid Lactarius species are known now. Zelleromyces Article info Received: 2 February 2013; Accepted: 18 June 2013; Published: 20 January 2014. INTRODUCTION sulales species (Gymnomyces lactifer B.C. Zhang & Y.N. Yu and Martellia ramispina B.C. Zhang & Y.N. Yu) and Tao et al. Sequestrate and angiocarpous basidiomata have developed in (1993) described Martellia nanjingensis B. Liu & K. Tao and several groups of Agaricomycetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd. Thesis Sana Jabeen.Pdf
    ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH HIMALAYAN CEDAR FROM PAKISTAN A dissertation submitted to the University of the Punjab in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BOTANY by SANA JABEEN DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB LAHORE, PAKISTAN JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO. Summary i Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 Literature review 5 Aims and objectives 11 CHAPTER 3 Materials and methods 12 3.1. Sampling site description 12 3.2. Sampling strategy 14 3.3. Sampling of sporocarps 14 3.4. Sampling and preservation of fruit bodies 14 3.5. Morphological studies of fruit bodies 14 3.6. Sampling of morphotypes 15 3.7. Soil sampling and analysis 15 3.8. Cleaning, morphotyping and storage of ectomycorrhizae 15 3.9. Morphological studies of ectomycorrhizae 16 3.10. Molecular studies 16 3.10.1. DNA extraction 16 3.10.2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 17 3.10.3. Sequence assembly and data mining 18 3.10.4. Multiple alignments and phylogenetic analysis 18 3.11. Climatic data collection 19 3.12. Statistical analysis 19 CHAPTER 4 Results 22 4.1. Characterization of above ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 22 4.2. Identification of ectomycorrhizal host 184 4.3. Characterization of non ectomycorrhizal fruit bodies 186 4.4. Characterization of saprobic fungi found from fruit bodies 188 4.5. Characterization of below ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 189 4.6. Characterization of below ground non ectomycorrhizal fungi 193 4.7. Identification of host taxa from ectomycorrhizal morphotypes 195 4.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Dune Fungi: Data Collation, Evaluation and Conservation Priorities
    Welsh Dune Fungi: Data Collation, Evaluation and Conservation Priorities S.E. Evans & P.J. Roberts Evidence Report No 134 About Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is the organisation responsible for the work carried out by the three former organisations, the Countryside Council for Wales, Environment Agency Wales and Forestry Commission Wales. It is also responsible for some functions previously undertaken by Welsh Government. Our purpose is to ensure that the natural resources of Wales are sustainably maintained, used and enhanced, now and in the future. We work for the communities of Wales to protect people and their homes as much as possible from environmental incidents like flooding and pollution. We provide opportunities for people to learn, use and benefit from Wales' natural resources. We work to support Wales' economy by enabling the sustainable use of natural resources to support jobs and enterprise. We help businesses and developers to understand and consider environmental limits when they make important decisions. We work to maintain and improve the quality of the environment for everyone and we work towards making the environment and our natural resources more resilient to climate change and other pressures. Page 2 of 57 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk Evidence at Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is an evidence based organisation. We seek to ensure that our strategy, decisions, operations and advice to Welsh Government and others are underpinned by sound and quality-assured evidence. We recognise that it is critically important to have a good understanding of our changing environment. We will realise this vision by: Maintaining and developing the technical specialist skills of our staff; Securing our data and information; Having a well resourced proactive programme of evidence work; Continuing to review and add to our evidence to ensure it is fit for the challenges facing us; and Communicating our evidence in an open and transparent way.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Gasteroid Fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota)
    Fungal Diversity Arizona gasteroid fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) Bates, S.T.1*, Roberson, R.W.1 and Desjardin, D.E.2 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA 2Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, California 94132, USA Bates, S.T., Roberson, R.W. and Desjardin, D.E. (2009). Arizona gasteroid fungi I: Lycoperdaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Fungal Diversity 37: 153-207. Twenty-eight species in the family Lycoperdaceae, commonly called ‘puffballs’, are reported from Arizona, USA. In addition to widely distributed species, understudied species (e.g., Calvatia cf. leiospora and Holocotylon brandegeeanum) are treated. Taxonomic descriptions and illustrations, which include microscopic characters, are given for each species, and a dichotomous key is presented to facilitate identification. Basidiospore morphology was also examined ultrastructurally using scanning electron microscopy, and phylogenetic analyses were carried out on nrRNA gene sequences (ITS1, ITS2, and 5.8S) from 42 species within (or closely allied to) the Lycoperdaceae. Key words: Agaricales, euagarics, fungal taxonomy, gasteroid fungi, gasteromycete, Lycoperdaceae, puffballs. Article Information Received 22 August 2008 Accepted 25 November 2008 Published online 1 August 2009 *Corresponding author: Scott T. Bates; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Agaricales, Boletales, and Russulales. Accordingly, a vigorous debate concerning the Lycoperdaceae Chevall.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi from the Owyhee Region
    FUNGI FROM THE OWYHEE REGION OF SOUTHERN IDAHO AND EASTERN OREGON bY Marcia C. Wicklow-Howard and Julie Kaltenecker Boise State University Boise, Idaho Prepared for: Eastside Ecosystem Management Project October 1994 THE OWYHEE REGION The Owyhee Region is south of the Snake River and covers Owyhee County, Idaho, Malheur County, Oregon, and a part of northern Nevada. It extends approximately from 115” to 118” West longitude and is bounded by parallels 41” to 44”. Owyhee County includes 7,662 square miles, Malheur County has 9,861 square miles, and the part of northern Nevada which is in the Owyhee River watershed is about 2,900 square miles. The elevations in the region range from about 660 m in the Snake River Plains and adjoining Owyhee Uplands to 2522 m at Hayden Peak in the Owyhee Mountains. Where the Snake River Plain area is mostly sediment-covered basalt, the area south of the Snake River known as the Owyhee Uplands, includes rolling hills, sharply dissected by basaltic plateaus. The Owyhee Mountains have a complex geology, with steep slopes of both basalt and granite. In the northern areas of the Owyhee Mountains, the steep hills, mountains, and escarpments consist of basalt. In other areas of the mountains the steep slopes are of granitic or rhyolitic origin. The mountains are surrounded by broad expanses of sagebrush covered plateaus. The soils of the Snake River Plains are generally non-calcareous and alkaline. Most are well-drained, with common soil textures of silt loam, loam and fine sand loam. In the Uplands and Mountains, the soils are often coarse textured on the surface, while the subsoils are loamy and non-calcareous.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ
    An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Fungal Biota of the An Annotated Catalogue of the Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY Grzyby_okladka.indd 6 11.02.2019 14:52:24 An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY LUBLIN 2019 REVIEWER Dr hab. Małgorzata Ruszkiewicz-Michalska COVER DESIN, TYPESETTING Studio Format © Te Authors, 2019 © Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press, Lublin 2019 ISBN 978-83-227-9164-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-8-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-9-3 (online) PUBLISHER Polish Botanical Society Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland pbsociety.org.pl Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press 20-031 Lublin, ul. Idziego Radziszewskiego 11 tel. (81) 537 53 04 wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] Sales Department tel. / fax (81) 537 53 02 Internet bookshop: wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] PRINTED IN POLAND, by „Elpil”, ul. Artyleryjska 11, 08-110 Siedlce AUTHOR’S AFFILIATION Department of Botany and Mycology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Monika Kozłowska, [email protected]; Wiesław
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S. Fish and Wild... http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Kenai/wildlife_and_habitat/species_list.html Kenai National Wildlife Refuge | Alaska Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List Below is a checklist of the species recorded on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. The list of 1865 species includes 34 mammals, 154 birds, one amphibian, 20 fish, 611 arthropods, 7 molluscs, 11 other animals, 493 vascular plants, 180 bryophytes, 29 fungi, and 325 lichens. Of the total number of species, 1771 are native, 89 are non-native, and five include both native and non-native subspecies. Non-native species are indicated by dagger symbols (†) and species having both native and non-native subspecies are indicated by double dagger symbols (‡). Fifteen species no longer occur on the Refuge, indicated by empty set symbols ( ∅). Data were updated on 15 October 2015. See also the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge checklist on iNaturalist.org ( https://www.inaturalist.org/check_lists/188476-Kenai-National-Wildlife- Refuge-Check-List ). Mammals ( #1 ) Birds ( #2 ) Amphibians ( #3 ) Fish ( #4 ) Arthropods ( #5 ) Molluscs ( #6 ) Other Animals ( #7 ) Vascular Plants ( #8 ) Other Plants ( #9 ) Fungi ( #10 ) Lichens ( #11 ) Change Log ( #changelog ) Mammals () Phylum Chordata Class Mammalia Order Artiodactyla Family Bovidae 1. Oreamnos americanus (Blainville, 1816) (Mountain goat) 2. Ovis dalli Nelson, 1884 (Dall's sheep) Family Cervidae 3. Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758) (Moose) 4. Rangifer tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Caribou) Order Carnivora Family Canidae 5. Canis latrans Say, 1823 (Coyote) 6. Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 (Gray wolf) 7. Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) (Red fox) Family Felidae 8. Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lynx) 9.
    [Show full text]