Sea-Power in Greek Thought Author(S): Arnaldo Momigliano Source: the Classical Review, Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sea-Power in Greek Thought Author(s): Arnaldo Momigliano Source: The Classical Review, Vol. 58, No. 1 (May, 1944), pp. 1-7 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/701960 Accessed: 06/09/2010 12:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and The Classical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Classical Review. http://www.jstor.org THE CLASSICALREVIEW MAY 1944 SEA-POWER IN GREEK THOUGHT As far as I know, the history of the idea According to him Polycrates was the of thalassocracy in Greek thought has first who conceived the design of gain- never been written-a surprising fact. ing the empire of the sea, 'unless it were Neither can I deal with it here ade- Minos the Cnossian, and those (if there quately. But an outline from Hero- were any such) who had the mastery of dotus to the Greek source on which the Aegean at an earlier time' (iii. 122). Cicero drew may well be attempted for A period of thalassocracy is attributed the use of future students.' also to Aegina (v. 83). In the alleged I. Reckoning power in terms of debate at Gelo's court, where the ships is already a feature of the Homeric Spartan and Athenian ambassadorsare Catalogue-not an obvious thing (apart supposed to have come for help (vii. from the position of the Catalogue in 157 ff.), Gelo asks for the supreme com- the Iliad), on which I should like to mand, but would remain content with hear more from Homeric scholars.z the command of the fleet. The Athen- The Odysseygives an account of a naval ians refuse it indignantly: if the Spar- powerin its descriptionof the Phaea- tans do not want to have it, the cians: they delight in ships rather than Athenians, who have 'raised up a navy in war, their fault is isolation (not greater than that of any other Greek promiscuity in their foreign relations, people', are the only ones entitled to the usual later criticism of maritime the succession. This is a good piece of cities). But the poet is somewhat Athenian retrospective propaganda of politicizing fairyland. His tale, al- the time of the Delian League (cf. vii. though largely utilized by philosophers 139 and Aesch. Pers. 728).' I leave and moralists for contrasting purposes, aside the list of thalassocracies which did not influence the later discussion Eusebius' Chronikonderived from Dio- on sea-power to a noticeable extent. dorus (Book VII). Some modern scho- Thalassocracy, as is well known, be- lars have attributed it to the labours comes a clear-cut idea in Herodotus. of an unknown Greek historian of the fifth and, indeed, SThe learned friends who century B.c., any helped my paper research of that type would fit the fifth 'Terra marique' (ourn. Rom. Stud. xxxii, 1942, 53) have contributedto this sketch also (I add the century. But I do not see sufficient names of A. W. Gomme, P. Treves, and A. N. evidence that the list, as we have it, is Sherwin-White);but they do not necessarilyshare earlier than Diodorus' contemporary my belief that a synthetic survey, however bad, Castor of Rhodes, whom we know to must precede analytic study, however good. Herodotus is quoted in Rawlinson's translation, have composed a treatise on thalas- Thucydides in Jowett's, Isocrates in G. Norlin's socracies. That Castor and, in general, (Loeb Library), Plato's Laws in A. E. Taylor's the scholars of the Alexandrian tradi- M. (J. Dent). tion were able to utilize fifth-century 2 I. ii. 614 distinguishessea-power from land- studies on that theme Hero- power. F. Jacoby explained 'Die Einschaltung (besides des Schiffkatalogsin die Ilias' in Sitz. Preuss. Ak. dotus and Thucydides) is possible, but 1932, 572 ff., but the historical interpretation of the not yet supported by proofs.Z catalogue has hardly progressed since B. Niese (1873)and E. Rohde, KI. Schriften,i. io7 (=Rh. I The latest discussion is by P. Treves, Class. Museum, xxxvi, 1881,570). W. Leaf, Homerand Philol. xxxvi, 1941, 321; but I am not certain, as History, 1915,though certainly right versus T. W. Trevesis, that the embassyto Gelois not historical. Allen, J.H.S. xxx, 1910, 292 (an article expanded, Cf. F. Jacoby, P.-W., Suppl. ii, s.v. 'Herodotus', but not improved, in his book of I192I), is again too 453-4. conjectural. At the moment non liquet is the 2 For the fifth-centuryorigin of the Eusebian wisest conclusion. Cf. J. L. Myres, Who werethe list see especially J. L. Myres,J.H.S. xxvi, 19o6, Greeks? 1930, 312. 84; xxvii, 1907, 123, and A. R. Burn, ib. 4598.15 2 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW In Athens facts had a way of becom- mocracy easy. Clearly the author is an ing spiritual problems; and Athenian oligarchicpessimist who despisesAthen- thalassocracy itself underwent search- ian democracy, but recognizes its con- ing analysis both in its presuppositions sistency and strength. He despairs of and its effects.' The controversy did a change, although he does not con- not remain confined to Athens. The sider it impossible, Athens not being pamphlet of Stesimbrotus of Thasos an island: if she were, her thalassocracy On Themistocles,Thucydides, and Peri- would be unbreakable. The author says cles (written after 430 B.C.) was in much less than he thinks, but obviously effect an attack on Athenian sea-power does not believe sea-power compatible and on Themistocles as a corrupter of with decent government. We shall the Athenian people (Plut. Themist. 4). find this conclusion explicit in Iso- It is no longer possible to say how much crates, De Pace. On this, as on many Stesimbrotus depended on contem- topics, Isocrates seems to derive his porary Athenian discussions. The argument from the anti-democratic Pseudo-Xenophontean Constitution of tradition of the fifth century. Athens, which I date between 431 and II. It would be difficult to prove that 425 B.c., with a slight preference for the Pericles' last speech in Thucydides years 431-430, offers more solid ground.z (ii. 60-4) is directed against the Pseudo- The writer affirmsthe relation between Xenophontean pamphlet, but probably sea-powerand democracy: as the power Thucydides knew it,' and certainly the of Athens depends on the sea, sailors set of arguments which Pericles takes are inevitably the masters of Athens. for granted, and sweepingly turns to He illustrates also the strategic advan- a glorification of the current war, tages of sea-power over land-power in would not have been repudiated by the forming and holding an empire: mili- oligarchic writer. Sea-poweris at stake tary campaigns can be organized, in this war. 'You think that your em- enemy trade can be hampered, hostile pire is confined to your allies, but I say coalitions can be forestalled much more that of the two divisions of the world easily by a naval than by a land power. accessible to man, the land and the Above all he knows that sea-power sea, there is one of which you are means wealth; and wealth makes de- absolute masters, and have, or may have, the dominion to any extent which This Contra: W. Rh. Mus. you please.' sea-power xlvii, 1927, 165. Aly, lxvi, implies tyranny, which it may seem 1911, 585; cf. R. Helm, Hermes, lxi, 1926, 241; Kubitschek,P.-W., s.v. 'Kastor', 2355. Relevant wrong to have assumed, but which it also are Jacoby, FGrH ii D, p. 816; G. Murray, is certainly dangerous to let go--and The Rise of the Greek Epic, 3rd ed., 1924, 322-6, inglorious, because hatred does not and H. Winckler, Der alte Orient, vii, 1905, 20. last long, but 'besides the immediate Castor's work is mentioned by Suidas (Jacoby, of the renown FGrH 250 T i). splendour great actions, I First direct evidence in Aeschylus,Pers. 728, of them endures for ever in men's of 472 B.C. memories'. The speech, clearly written 2 I think that the pamphlet is later than the or rewritten after the end of the first Spartan invasion of Attica and earlier than does not one Brasidas'expedition to Thraceand very probably Peloponnesian War, deny than Aristophanes'Knights; also it is easier to of the main contentions of the oli- understandif it is earlier than the great plague, garchic analysis of Athenian power: although (as H. T. Wade-Gerypoints out to me) the Athenian is a the is not to be democracy tyranny a mention of plague expected.