Original Article Mir-503 Inhibits Adipogenesis by Targeting Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor 1A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gene Symbol Gene Description ACVR1B Activin a Receptor, Type IB
Table S1. Kinase clones included in human kinase cDNA library for yeast two-hybrid screening Gene Symbol Gene Description ACVR1B activin A receptor, type IB ADCK2 aarF domain containing kinase 2 ADCK4 aarF domain containing kinase 4 AGK multiple substrate lipid kinase;MULK AK1 adenylate kinase 1 AK3 adenylate kinase 3 like 1 AK3L1 adenylate kinase 3 ALDH18A1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 18 family, member A1;ALDH18A1 ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase (Ki-1) ALPK1 alpha-kinase 1 ALPK2 alpha-kinase 2 AMHR2 anti-Mullerian hormone receptor, type II ARAF v-raf murine sarcoma 3611 viral oncogene homolog 1 ARSG arylsulfatase G;ARSG AURKB aurora kinase B AURKC aurora kinase C BCKDK branched chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase BMPR1A bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type IA BMPR2 bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type II (serine/threonine kinase) BRAF v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 BRD3 bromodomain containing 3 BRD4 bromodomain containing 4 BTK Bruton agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase BUB1 BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (yeast) BUB1B BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (yeast) C9orf98 chromosome 9 open reading frame 98;C9orf98 CABC1 chaperone, ABC1 activity of bc1 complex like (S. pombe) CALM1 calmodulin 1 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CALM2 calmodulin 2 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CALM3 calmodulin 3 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CAMK1 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I CAMK2A calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) II alpha CAMK2B calcium/calmodulin-dependent -
Familial Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome with a De Novo Germline Missense Variant in BMPR1A Gene: a Case Report Qing Liu, Mengling Liu, Tianshu Liu and Yiyi Yu*
Liu et al. BMC Medical Genetics (2020) 21:196 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-020-01135-6 CASE REPORT Open Access Familial juvenile polyposis syndrome with a de novo germline missense variant in BMPR1A gene: a case report Qing Liu, Mengling Liu, Tianshu Liu and Yiyi Yu* Abstract Background: Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disorder characterized by the development of multiple distinct juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Germline mutations in two genes, SMAD4 and BMPR1A, have been identified to cause JPS. Case presentation: Here, we report a germline heterozygous missense variant (c.299G > A) in exon 3 BMPR1A gene in a family with juvenile polyposis. This variant was absent from the population database, and concluded as de novo compared with the parental sequencing. Further sequencing of the proband’s children confirmed the segregation of this variant with the disease, while the variant was also predicted to have damaging effect based on online prediction tools. Therefore, this variant was classified as likely pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Conclusions: Germline genetic testing revealed a de novo germline missense variant in BMPR1A gene in a family with juvenile polyposis. Identification of the pathogenic variant facilitates the cancer risk management of at-risk family members, and endoscopic surveillance is recommended for mutation carriers. Keywords: Juvenile polyposis syndrome, BMPR1A gene, De novo germline variant, Missense variant Background two genes, SMAD4 and BMPR1A, have been identi- Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal fied to cause JPS [5]. -
The Prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A Mutations in Juvenile Polyposis and Absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 Mutations
484 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.2004.018598 on 2 July 2004. Downloaded from The prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A mutations in juvenile polyposis and absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 mutations J R Howe, M G Sayed, A F Ahmed, J Ringold, J Larsen-Haidle, A Merg, F A Mitros, C A Vaccaro, G M Petersen, F M Giardiello, S T Tinley, L A Aaltonen, H T Lynch ............................................................................................................................... J Med Genet 2004;41:484–491. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.018598 Background: Juvenile polyposis (JP) is an autosomal dominant syndrome predisposing to colorectal and gastric cancer. We have identified mutations in two genes causing JP, MADH4 and bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A (BMPR1A): both are involved in bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) mediated signalling and are members of the TGF-b superfamily. This study determined the prevalence of mutations See end of article for in MADH4 and BMPR1A, as well as three other BMP/activin pathway candidate genes in a large number authors’ affiliations ....................... of JP patients. Methods: DNA was extracted from the blood of JP patients and used for PCR amplification of each exon of Correspondence to: these five genes, using primers flanking each intron–exon boundary. Mutations were determined by Dr J R Howe, Department of Surgery, 4644 JCP, comparison to wild type sequences using sequence analysis software. A total of 77 JP cases were University of Iowa College sequenced for mutations in the MADH4, BMPR1A, BMPR1B, BMPR2, and/or ACVR1 (activin A receptor) of Medicine, 200 Hawkins genes. The latter three genes were analysed when MADH4 and BMPR1A sequencing found no mutations. -
DNA Damage and the Activation of the P53 Pathway Mediate Alterations in Metabolic and Secretory Functions of Adipocytes
3062 Diabetes Volume 65, October 2016 Bastien Vergoni,1,2 Pierre-Jean Cornejo,1,2 Jérôme Gilleron,1,2 Mansour Djedaini,1,2 Franck Ceppo,1,2 Arnaud Jacquel,2,3 Gwennaelle Bouget,1,2 Clémence Ginet,1,2 Teresa Gonzalez,1,2,4 Julie Maillet,5,6,7 Véronique Dhennin,5,6,7 Marie Verbanck,5,6,7 Patrick Auberger,2,3 Philippe Froguel,5,6,7,8 Jean-François Tanti,1,2 and Mireille Cormont1,2 DNA Damage and the Activation of the p53 Pathway Mediate Alterations in Metabolic and Secretory Functions of Adipocytes Diabetes 2016;65:3062–3074 | DOI: 10.2337/db16-0014 Activation of the p53 pathway in adipose tissue contributes Insulin resistance is associated with obesity and is a major to insulin resistance associated with obesity. However, the risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Adipose tissue (AT) plays mechanisms of p53 activation and the effect on adipocyte an important role in glucose and lipid homeostasis (1,2), functions are still elusive. Here we found a higher level of and AT dysfunction associated with obesity has emerged DNA oxidation and a reduction in telomere length in adipose as a critical event for the development of insulin resis- tissueofmicefedahigh-fatdietandanincreaseinDNA tance. Low-grade inflammation and oxidative and hypoxic damage and activation of the p53 pathway in adipocytes. stresses both develop in obese AT and are involved in the Interestingly, hallmarks of chronic DNA damage are visible alteration of adipocyte functions (3–6). Therefore, activa- at the onset of obesity. Furthermore, injection of lean mice tion of stress-signaling pathways in adipocytes is critically with doxorubicin, a DNA damage-inducing drug, increased involved in AT dysfunction and insulin resistance (7–10). -
Tumor Promoting Effect of BMP Signaling in Endometrial Cancer
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Tumor Promoting Effect of BMP Signaling in Endometrial Cancer Tomohiko Fukuda 1,* , Risa Fukuda 1, Kohei Miyazono 1,2,† and Carl-Henrik Heldin 1,*,† 1 Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Box 582, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (R.F.); [email protected] (K.M.) 2 Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.F.); [email protected] (C.-H.H.); Tel.: +46-18-4714738 (T.F.); +46-18-4714738 (C.-H.H.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: The effects of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family, in endometrial cancer (EC) have yet to be determined. In this study, we analyzed the TCGA and MSK-IMPACT datasets and investigated the effects of BMP2 and of TWSG1, a BMP antagonist, on Ishikawa EC cells. Frequent ACVR1 mutations and high mRNA expressions of BMP ligands and receptors were observed in EC patients of the TCGA and MSK-IMPACT datasets. Ishikawa cells secreted higher amounts of BMP2 compared with ovarian cancer cell lines. Exogenous BMP2 stimulation enhanced EC cell sphere formation via c-KIT induction. BMP2 also induced EMT of EC cells, and promoted migration by induction of SLUG. The BMP receptor kinase inhibitor LDN193189 augmented the growth inhibitory effects of carboplatin. Analyses of mRNAs of several BMP antagonists revealed that TWSG1 mRNA was abundantly expressed in Ishikawa cells. -
Selective Insulin Signaling Through a and B Insulin Receptors Regulates Transcription of Insulin and Glucokinase Genes in Pancreatic  Cells
Molecular Cell, Vol. 7, 559±570, March, 2001, Copyright 2001 by Cell Press Selective Insulin Signaling through A and B Insulin Receptors Regulates Transcription of Insulin and Glucokinase Genes in Pancreatic  Cells Barbara Leibiger,*§ Ingo B. Leibiger,*§k ceptors as the primary target, include signaling via mito- Tilo Moede,* Sabine Kemper,* gen-activated protein (MAP) kinases and phosphoinosi- Rohit N. Kulkarni,² C. Ronald Kahn,² tol-3 kinase (PI3K). The insulin receptor (IR), the first Lina Moitoso de Vargas,³ and Per-Olof Berggren* step in these cascades, exists in two isoforms as a result *The Rolf Luft Center for Diabetes Research of alternative mRNA splicing of the 11th exon of the insulin Department of Molecular Medicine proreceptor transcript (Seino et al., 1989). The A type Karolinska Institutet (IR-A), or Ex11Ϫ (Ullrich et al., 1985), lacks whereas the S-171 76 Stockholm B type (IR-B), or Ex11ϩ (Ebina et al., 1985), contains Sweden the respective sequence coding for 12 amino acids in ² Research Division the C terminus of the ␣ chain of the receptor. To date, Joslin Diabetes Center and no insulin-induced effect has been reported that dis- Department of Medicine criminates signaling via A- and B-type receptors. In fact, Harvard Medical School the functional significance of these IR isoforms remains Boston, Massachusetts 02215 unclear. ³ Department of Medicine Recent studies have shown that the insulin-producing New England Medical Center and pancreatic  cell is a target for insulin action, with insulin Tufts University School of Medicine effects on transcription, translation, Ca2ϩ flux, and exo- Boston, Massachusetts 02111 cytosis (Leibiger et al., 1998a, 2000; Xu and Rothenberg, 1998; Xu et al., 1998; Aspinwall et al., 1999; Kulkarni et al., 1999a). -
Insulin–Insr Signaling Drives Multipotent Progenitor Differentiation Toward Lymphoid Lineages
Article Insulin–InsR signaling drives multipotent progenitor differentiation toward lymphoid lineages Pengyan Xia,1* Shuo Wang,1* Ying Du,1 Guanling Huang,1,2 Takashi Satoh,3 Shizuo Akira,3 and Zusen Fan1 1Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunity of CAS, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases (RIMD), Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan The lineage commitment of HSCs generates balanced myeloid and lymphoid populations in hematopoiesis. However, the un- derlying mechanisms that control this process remain largely unknown. Here, we show that insulin–insulin receptor (InsR) signaling is required for lineage commitment of multipotent progenitors (MPPs). Deletion of Insr in murine bone marrow causes skewed differentiation of MPPs to myeloid cells. mTOR acts as a downstream effector that modulates MPP differentiation. mTOR activates Stat3 by phosphorylation at serine 727 under insulin stimulation, which binds to the promoter of Ikaros, lead- ing to its transcription priming. Our findings reveal that the insulin–InsR signaling drives MPP differentiation into lymphoid lineages in early lymphopoiesis, which is essential for maintaining a balanced immune system for an individual organism. Hematopoiesis is the process of producing all compo- Insulin, as the primary anabolic hormone, modulates a nents of the blood system from hematopoietic stem cells variety of physiological processes, including growth, differ- (HSCs; Naik et al., 2013; Mendelson and Frenette, 2014; entiation, apoptosis, and synthesis and breakdown of lipid, Walter et al., 2015). HSCs are quiescent, self-renewable pro- protein, and glucose (Samuel and Shulman, 2012). -
Gene Standard Deviation MTOR 0.12553731 PRPF38A
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Gut Gene Standard Deviation MTOR 0.12553731 PRPF38A 0.141472605 EIF2B4 0.154700091 DDX50 0.156333027 SMC3 0.161420017 NFAT5 0.166316903 MAP2K1 0.166585267 KDM1A 0.16904912 RPS6KB1 0.170330192 FCF1 0.170391706 MAP3K7 0.170660513 EIF4E2 0.171572093 TCEB1 0.175363093 CNOT10 0.178975095 SMAD1 0.179164705 NAA15 0.179904998 SETD2 0.180182498 HDAC3 0.183971158 AMMECR1L 0.184195031 CHD4 0.186678211 SF3A3 0.186697697 CNOT4 0.189434633 MTMR14 0.189734199 SMAD4 0.192451524 TLK2 0.192702667 DLG1 0.19336621 COG7 0.193422331 SP1 0.194364189 PPP3R1 0.196430217 ERBB2IP 0.201473001 RAF1 0.206887192 CUL1 0.207514271 VEZF1 0.207579584 SMAD3 0.208159809 TFDP1 0.208834504 VAV2 0.210269344 ADAM17 0.210687138 SMURF2 0.211437666 MRPS5 0.212428684 TMUB2 0.212560675 SRPK2 0.216217428 MAP2K4 0.216345366 VHL 0.219735582 SMURF1 0.221242495 PLCG1 0.221688351 EP300 0.221792349 Sundar R, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–10. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320805 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Gut MGAT5 0.222050228 CDC42 0.2230598 DICER1 0.225358787 RBX1 0.228272533 ZFYVE16 0.22831803 PTEN 0.228595789 PDCD10 0.228799406 NF2 0.23091035 TP53 0.232683696 RB1 0.232729172 TCF20 0.2346075 PPP2CB 0.235117302 AGK 0.235416298 -
PSM, a Mediator of PDGF-BB-, IGF-I-, and Insulin-Stimulated Mitogenesis
Oncogene (2000) 19, 39 ± 50 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/onc PSM, a mediator of PDGF-BB-, IGF-I-, and insulin-stimulated mitogenesis Heimo Riedel*,1,2, Nasim Yousaf1, Yuyuan Zhao4, Heping Dai1,3, Youping Deng1 and Jian Wang1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, MI 48202, USA; 2Member, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, MI 48201, USA PSM/SH2-B has been described as a cellular partner of Introduction the FceRI receptor, insulin receptor (IR), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor (IGF-IR), and nerve The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) family growth factor receptor (TrkA). A function has been represents key mitogenic and chemotactic factors that proposed in neuronal dierentiation and development but have been exploited by the Simian sarcoma virus v-sis its role in other signaling pathways is still unclear. To oncogene which results in altered PDGF expression further elucidate the physiologic role of PSM we have (Water®eld et al., 1983). Normal cellular PDGF identi®ed additional mitogenic receptor tyrosine kinases appears in three distinct isoforms as any combination as putative PSM partners including platelet-derived of the PDGF A and B chains which act in paracrine growth factor (PDGF) receptor (PDGFR) beta, hepato- and autocrine mechanisms (Heldin, 1993). PDGF cyte growth factor receptor (Met), and ®broblast growth receptor (PDGFR) signal transduction appears to be factor receptor. We have mapped Y740 as a site of a largely membrane delineated event (Hughes et al., PDGFR beta that is involved in the association with 1996). -
The Role of the TGF- Co-Receptor Endoglin in Cancer
1 The role of the TGF- co-receptor endoglin in cancer Eduardo Pérez-Gómez1,†, Gaelle del Castillo1, Juan Francisco Santibáñez2, Jose Miguel López-Novoa3, Carmelo Bernabéu4 and 1,* Miguel Quintanilla . 1Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28029-Madrid, Spain; 2Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrado, Belgrado, Serbia; 3Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación Nefrológica, Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 4Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] † Current address: Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular I, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain *Corresponding author 2 ABSTRACT Endoglin (CD105) is an auxiliary membrane receptor of transforming growth factor- (TGF-) that interacts with type I and type II TGF- receptors and modulates TGF- signalling. Mutations in endoglin are involved in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia type I, a disorder characterized by cutaneous telangiectasias, epistaxis (nosebleeds) and major arteriovenous shunts, mainly in liver and lung. Endoglin is overexpressed in the tumor-associated vascular endothelium where it modulates angiogenesis. This feature makes endoglin a promising target for antiangiogenic cancer therapy. Recent studies on human and experimental models of carcinogenesis point to an important tumor cell-autonomous role of endoglin by regulating proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis. These studies suggest that endoglin behaves as a suppressor of malignancy in experimental and human carcinogenesis. In this review, we evaluate the implication of endoglin in tumor development underlying studies developed in our laboratories in recent years. -
CD Markers Are Routinely Used for the Immunophenotyping of Cells
ptglab.com 1 CD MARKER ANTIBODIES www.ptglab.com Introduction The cluster of differentiation (abbreviated as CD) is a protocol used for the identification and investigation of cell surface molecules. So-called CD markers are routinely used for the immunophenotyping of cells. Despite this use, they are not limited to roles in the immune system and perform a variety of roles in cell differentiation, adhesion, migration, blood clotting, gamete fertilization, amino acid transport and apoptosis, among many others. As such, Proteintech’s mini catalog featuring its antibodies targeting CD markers is applicable to a wide range of research disciplines. PRODUCT FOCUS PECAM1 Platelet endothelial cell adhesion of blood vessels – making up a large portion molecule-1 (PECAM1), also known as cluster of its intracellular junctions. PECAM-1 is also CD Number of differentiation 31 (CD31), is a member of present on the surface of hematopoietic the immunoglobulin gene superfamily of cell cells and immune cells including platelets, CD31 adhesion molecules. It is highly expressed monocytes, neutrophils, natural killer cells, on the surface of the endothelium – the thin megakaryocytes and some types of T-cell. Catalog Number layer of endothelial cells lining the interior 11256-1-AP Type Rabbit Polyclonal Applications ELISA, FC, IF, IHC, IP, WB 16 Publications Immunohistochemical of paraffin-embedded Figure 1: Immunofluorescence staining human hepatocirrhosis using PECAM1, CD31 of PECAM1 (11256-1-AP), Alexa 488 goat antibody (11265-1-AP) at a dilution of 1:50 anti-rabbit (green), and smooth muscle KD/KO Validated (40x objective). alpha-actin (red), courtesy of Nicola Smart. PECAM1: Customer Testimonial Nicola Smart, a cardiovascular researcher “As you can see [the immunostaining] is and a group leader at the University of extremely clean and specific [and] displays Oxford, has said of the PECAM1 antibody strong intercellular junction expression, (11265-1-AP) that it “worked beautifully as expected for a cell adhesion molecule.” on every occasion I’ve tried it.” Proteintech thanks Dr. -
Structure of the Tie2 RTK Domain: Self-Inhibition by the Nucleotide Binding Loop, Activation Loop, and C-Terminal Tail
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Structure, Vol. 8, 1105±1113, November, 2000, 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII S0969-2126(00)00516-5 Structure of the Tie2 RTK Domain: Self-Inhibition by the Nucleotide Binding Loop, Activation Loop, and C-Terminal Tail Lisa M. Shewchuk,* Anne M. Hassell, Byron Ellis, binding domain and an intracellular kinase domain. Binding of W. D. Holmes, Roderick Davis, Earnest L. Horne, extracellular ligand is believed to promote dimerization, which Sue H. Kadwell, David D. McKee, leads to autophosphorylation and activation of the kinase do- and John T. Moore main [reviewed in 15]. Stringent regulation of the phosphoryla- GlaxoWellcome tion state and activity of the Tie2 kinase domain is crucial to Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 normal vasculature development and maintenance. Tie2 activ- ity is precisely regulated by the opposing actions of agonistic and antagonistic extracellular ligands [16±18]. Tie2 activation Summary requires autophosporylation in response to binding its agonists angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) and Ang4, whereas inactivation occurs Background: Angiogenesis, the formation of new vessels from in response to Ang2 and Ang3. Tie2 mutations, which result the existing vasculature, is a critical process during early devel- in ligand-independent and enhanced autophosphorylation, opment as well as in a number of disease processes. Tie2 (also cause hereditary venous malformations [19, 20]. Conversely, known as Tek) is an endothelium-specific receptor tyrosine transgenic mice that express a kinase-inactive form of Tie2 or kinase involved in both angiogenesis and vasculature mainte- Tie2 null mice die in utero due to defects in their microvascula- nance.