DOCSLIB.ORG

BMPR1A Is Necessary for Chondrogenesis and Osteogenesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BMPR1A Is Necessary for Chondrogenesis and Osteogenesis © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2020) 133, jcs246934. doi:10.1242/jcs.246934 RESEARCH ARTICLE BMPR1A is necessary for chondrogenesis and osteogenesis, whereas BMPR1B prevents hypertrophic differentiation Tanja Mang1,2, Kerstin Kleinschmidt-Doerr1, Frank Ploeger3, Andreas Schoenemann4, Sven Lindemann1 and Anne Gigout1,* ABSTRACT essential for osteogenesis and bone formation during this process BMP2 stimulates bone formation and signals preferably through BMP (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2006; McBride et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2013). – receptor (BMPR) 1A, whereas GDF5 is a cartilage inducer and signals Similarly, during bone fracture healing where a similar mechanism – preferably through BMPR1B. Consequently, BMPR1A and BMPR1B are takes place conditional deletion of Bmp2 in mesenchymal believed to be involved in bone and cartilage formation, respectively. progenitors or osteoprogenitors prevents fracture healing (Mi et al., However, their function is not yet fully clarified. In this study, GDF5 2013; Tsuji et al., 2006). In vitro, BMP2 provokes an induction of mutants with a decreased affinity for BMPR1A were generated. These alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, osteocalcin expression and matrix mutants, and wild-type GDF5 and BMP2, were tested for their ability to mineralization in pluripotent mesenchymal progenitor cells (Cheng induce dimerization of BMPR1A or BMPR1B with BMPR2, and for their et al., 2003), and also stimulates chondrogenesis or adipogenesis (Date chondrogenic, hypertrophic and osteogenic properties in chondrocytes, et al., 2004). Finally, BMP2 has been shown to promote bone repair in in the multipotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C3H10T1/2 and the animal models (Kleinschmidt et al., 2013; Wulsten et al., 2011) and in human osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2. Mutants with the lowest potency a clinical setting (Ronga et al., 2013). for inducing BMPR1A–BMPR2 dimerization exhibited minimal Growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5; also named BMP14 or chondrogenic and osteogenic activities, indicating that BMPR1A is CDMP1) is also expressed in the developing limb at sites where joint necessary for chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation. BMP2, GDF5 cavitation occurs, and null mutation of Gdf5 in mice disrupts the and the GDF5 R399E mutant stimulated expression of chondrogenic and formation of 30% of the synovial joints (Storm and Kingsley, 1996). hypertrophy markers in C3H10T1/2 cells and chondrocytes. However, Several gene expression or deletion studies strongly indicate that GDF5 R399E, which induces the dimerization of BMPR1B and BMPR2 GDF5 (together with GDF6 and GDF7) provides a specialized more potently than GDF5 or BMP2, displayed reduced hypertrophic function for joint morphogenesis (Settle et al., 2003; Storm and activity. Therefore, we postulate that stronger BMPR1B signaling, Kingsley, 1999). In vitro, GDF5 promotes chondrogenic compared to BMPR1A signaling, prevents chondrocyte hypertrophy differentiation and chondrocyte hypertrophy (Coleman et al., 2013; and acts as a cartilage stabilizer during joint morphogenesis. Erlacher et al., 1998). Subcutaneous implantation of collagen or collagen/hyaluronate loaded with GDF5 in the rat results in cartilage This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author formation followed by bone formation (Erlacher et al., 1998; Spiro of the paper. et al., 2000). In bone defect models, GDF5 caused delayed tissue mineralization compared to BMP2 and the presence of cartilage tissue KEY WORDS: GDF5, BMP2, M1673, Chondrogenesis, Hypertrophy, in the defect (Kleinschmidt et al., 2013; Wulsten et al., 2011). Finally, Osteogenesis intra-articular injections of GDF5 stimulated cartilage repair in a rat osteoarthritis model (Parrish et al., 2017). In conclusion, both BMP2 INTRODUCTION and GDF5 promote cartilage and bone formation, but BMP2 more Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) play a role in a multitude of strongly promotes osteogenesis and bone formation than does GDF5. processes during embryonic development, including skeletal BMP2 and GDF5 elicit their effects through two types of serine/ development. Most skeletal elements are formed by endochondral threonine kinase transmembrane receptors; type I and type II ossification, which is initiated by mesenchymal cell condensation. receptors. There are three type II and seven type I receptors that Under the influence of several BMPs, these cells differentiate into interact with BMPs, and the association of a type I with a type II chondrocytes that produce cartilaginous tissue, and further differentiate receptor is required for the formation of an active signaling complex. into hypertrophic chondrocytes. Afterward, vascularization takes place BMP2 and GDF5 are both known to interact with all three type II concomitantly with replacement of cartilage into bone, driven by receptors (BMPR2, ACVR1 and ACVR2) together with the type I osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Katagiri and Watabe, 2016; Salazar et al., receptors BMPR1A or BMPR1B. However, BMP2 and GDF5 2016). Several conditional deletion studies have shown that BMP2 is preferentially interact with BMPR1A and BMPR1B, respectively (Heinecke et al., 2009; Nishitoh et al., 1996). In accordance with the 1Osteoarthritis Research, Merck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. 2Institute for role of BMPs in skeletal development, the receptors Bmpr1a and Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Technische Universität, 64289 Darmstadt, Bmpr1b are expressed in the developing limbs (Baur et al., 2000; Germany. 3Biopharm GmbH, 69214 Eppelheim, Germany. 4Discovery Dewulf et al., 1995; Zou et al., 1997). Several studies have aimed to Pharmacology, Merck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. decipher the role of BMPR1A and BMPR1B in skeletal development. *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) In vivo, the use of loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations revealed some redundancy in the role of these two BMP type I T.M., 0000-0002-6497-3034; A.G., 0000-0003-1399-7957 receptors (Kobayashi et al., 2005; Yoon et al., 2005). In vitro, Handling Editor: John Heath contradictory results have been published. For instance, it has been Received 26 March 2020; Accepted 21 July 2020 shown that constitutively active forms of BMPR1A and BMPR1B Journal of Cell Science 1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2020) 133, jcs246934. doi:10.1242/jcs.246934 activate chondrogenesis in ADTC5 cells (Fujii et al., 1999), whereas BMP2, GDF5, W417R and W417F. Similar to the Kd values, the forced expression of BMPR1A, but not BMPR1B, stimulates ratio of EC50 values were calculated. The same selectivity profile osteogenesis and chondrogenesis in C3H10T1/2 cells (Kaps et al., was obtained; BMP2 was more selective for BMPR1A than 2004). BMPR1B and the selectivity was shifted toward BMPR1B with In conclusion, the respective role of BMPR1A and BMPR1B in GDF5, R399E, W417F and W417R. chondrogenesis and osteogenesis is not yet fully clear. In this study, we tackled this question from a different angle. Although genetic BMPR expression, Nog sensitivity and Nog expression manipulations are extremely helpful, the results should be interpreted To ensure that the cells selected to study chondrogenesis and with caution. Silencing the expression of one protein can be osteogenesis are relevant, we verified that they express the receptors compensated by the expression of other similar proteins (Rossi we intend to study. The C3H10T1/2 cells, Saos-2 cells and porcine et al., 2015), while overexpression induces non-physiological protein chondrocytes all express Bmpr1a/BMPR1A, Bmpr1b/BMPR1B and expression levels and might generate results that do not accurately Bmpr2/BMPR2 (Fig. S1). In addition, because the proteins we use reflect the biology. As an alternative, we generated several mutants of in this work derive from the human GDF5 sequence and were tested GDF5 that differentially activate BMPR1A or BMPR1B. These on human receptors for the affinity or dimerization measurements, mutants were tested together with wild-type GDF5 and BMP2 for we also evaluated the percentage identity between human, porcine their chondrogenic, hypertrophic and osteogenic properties in the or mouse BMPRs (see Table S1). For all sequences, a high identity multipotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C3H10T1/2, primary was found (>96%) and variations within the sequence are limited to chondrocytes and the human osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2. regions that are not involved into ligand binding (Kotzsch et al., 2009; Weber et al., 2007; Mace et al., 2006). RESULTS Finally, we also evaluated the noggin (Nog) sensitivity of the Binding affinity of BMP2, GDF5 and the GDF5 mutants as GDF5 mutants. Nog is an inhibitor of BMPs that can be produced by measured by surface plasmon resonance chondrocytes or C3H10T1/2 cells (Kameda et al., 2000; Zehentner The binding affinities of BMP2, GDF5 and the three GDF5 mutants et al., 2002). It was previously shown that Noggin inhibits GDF5, for BMPR2, BMPR1A and BMPR1B were measured by surface and that specific mutations of GDF5 can suppress Noggin plasmon resonance (SPR) (Table 1). The affinity measurements of inhibition. (Seemann et al., 2009). We found cells that stimulated BMP2, GDF5, R399E and W417F with BMPR2 resulted in Kd with GDF5, R399E and BMP2 were strongly sensitive to Nog values in the 2-digit nM range, while no binding of W417R could be treatment but those stimulated with W417F and W417R were less detected. The Kd values obtained for BMPR1B were in the 2- to affected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Protein Kinase C Alpha Deficiency in a Mouse Model
    Aus der Medizinischen Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Infektiologie und Pneumologie der Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Eingereicht über das Institut für Veterinär-Physiologie des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Characterization of Protein Kinase C Alpha Deficiency in a Mouse Model Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) an der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Elena Ariane Noe Tierärztin aus Düsseldorf Berlin 2016 Journal-Nr.: 3878 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jürgen Zentek Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Petra Reinhold Zweiter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Witzenrath Dritter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christa Thöne-Reineke Deskriptoren (nach CAB-Thesaurus): Mice; animal models; protein kinase C (MeSH); pulmonary artery; hypertension; blood pressure, vasoconstriction; esophageal sphincter, lower (MeSH); respiratory system; smooth muscle; esophageal achalasia (MeSH) Tag der Promotion: 14.07.2016 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................... V List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... VII 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Protein Kinase C (PKC) and its Role in Smooth Muscle Contraction ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Symbol Gene Description ACVR1B Activin a Receptor, Type IB
    Table S1. Kinase clones included in human kinase cDNA library for yeast two-hybrid screening Gene Symbol Gene Description ACVR1B activin A receptor, type IB ADCK2 aarF domain containing kinase 2 ADCK4 aarF domain containing kinase 4 AGK multiple substrate lipid kinase;MULK AK1 adenylate kinase 1 AK3 adenylate kinase 3 like 1 AK3L1 adenylate kinase 3 ALDH18A1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 18 family, member A1;ALDH18A1 ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase (Ki-1) ALPK1 alpha-kinase 1 ALPK2 alpha-kinase 2 AMHR2 anti-Mullerian hormone receptor, type II ARAF v-raf murine sarcoma 3611 viral oncogene homolog 1 ARSG arylsulfatase G;ARSG AURKB aurora kinase B AURKC aurora kinase C BCKDK branched chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase BMPR1A bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type IA BMPR2 bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type II (serine/threonine kinase) BRAF v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 BRD3 bromodomain containing 3 BRD4 bromodomain containing 4 BTK Bruton agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase BUB1 BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (yeast) BUB1B BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (yeast) C9orf98 chromosome 9 open reading frame 98;C9orf98 CABC1 chaperone, ABC1 activity of bc1 complex like (S. pombe) CALM1 calmodulin 1 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CALM2 calmodulin 2 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CALM3 calmodulin 3 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) CAMK1 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I CAMK2A calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) II alpha CAMK2B calcium/calmodulin-dependent
    [Show full text]
  • Familial Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome with a De Novo Germline Missense Variant in BMPR1A Gene: a Case Report Qing Liu, Mengling Liu, Tianshu Liu and Yiyi Yu*
    Liu et al. BMC Medical Genetics (2020) 21:196 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-020-01135-6 CASE REPORT Open Access Familial juvenile polyposis syndrome with a de novo germline missense variant in BMPR1A gene: a case report Qing Liu, Mengling Liu, Tianshu Liu and Yiyi Yu* Abstract Background: Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disorder characterized by the development of multiple distinct juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Germline mutations in two genes, SMAD4 and BMPR1A, have been identified to cause JPS. Case presentation: Here, we report a germline heterozygous missense variant (c.299G > A) in exon 3 BMPR1A gene in a family with juvenile polyposis. This variant was absent from the population database, and concluded as de novo compared with the parental sequencing. Further sequencing of the proband’s children confirmed the segregation of this variant with the disease, while the variant was also predicted to have damaging effect based on online prediction tools. Therefore, this variant was classified as likely pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Conclusions: Germline genetic testing revealed a de novo germline missense variant in BMPR1A gene in a family with juvenile polyposis. Identification of the pathogenic variant facilitates the cancer risk management of at-risk family members, and endoscopic surveillance is recommended for mutation carriers. Keywords: Juvenile polyposis syndrome, BMPR1A gene, De novo germline variant, Missense variant Background two genes, SMAD4 and BMPR1A, have been identi- Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal fied to cause JPS [5].
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A Mutations in Juvenile Polyposis and Absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 Mutations
    484 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.2004.018598 on 2 July 2004. Downloaded from The prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A mutations in juvenile polyposis and absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 mutations J R Howe, M G Sayed, A F Ahmed, J Ringold, J Larsen-Haidle, A Merg, F A Mitros, C A Vaccaro, G M Petersen, F M Giardiello, S T Tinley, L A Aaltonen, H T Lynch ............................................................................................................................... J Med Genet 2004;41:484–491. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.018598 Background: Juvenile polyposis (JP) is an autosomal dominant syndrome predisposing to colorectal and gastric cancer. We have identified mutations in two genes causing JP, MADH4 and bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A (BMPR1A): both are involved in bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) mediated signalling and are members of the TGF-b superfamily. This study determined the prevalence of mutations See end of article for in MADH4 and BMPR1A, as well as three other BMP/activin pathway candidate genes in a large number authors’ affiliations ....................... of JP patients. Methods: DNA was extracted from the blood of JP patients and used for PCR amplification of each exon of Correspondence to: these five genes, using primers flanking each intron–exon boundary. Mutations were determined by Dr J R Howe, Department of Surgery, 4644 JCP, comparison to wild type sequences using sequence analysis software. A total of 77 JP cases were University of Iowa College sequenced for mutations in the MADH4, BMPR1A, BMPR1B, BMPR2, and/or ACVR1 (activin A receptor) of Medicine, 200 Hawkins genes. The latter three genes were analysed when MADH4 and BMPR1A sequencing found no mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumor Promoting Effect of BMP Signaling in Endometrial Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Tumor Promoting Effect of BMP Signaling in Endometrial Cancer Tomohiko Fukuda 1,* , Risa Fukuda 1, Kohei Miyazono 1,2,† and Carl-Henrik Heldin 1,*,† 1 Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Box 582, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (R.F.); [email protected] (K.M.) 2 Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.F.); [email protected] (C.-H.H.); Tel.: +46-18-4714738 (T.F.); +46-18-4714738 (C.-H.H.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: The effects of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family, in endometrial cancer (EC) have yet to be determined. In this study, we analyzed the TCGA and MSK-IMPACT datasets and investigated the effects of BMP2 and of TWSG1, a BMP antagonist, on Ishikawa EC cells. Frequent ACVR1 mutations and high mRNA expressions of BMP ligands and receptors were observed in EC patients of the TCGA and MSK-IMPACT datasets. Ishikawa cells secreted higher amounts of BMP2 compared with ovarian cancer cell lines. Exogenous BMP2 stimulation enhanced EC cell sphere formation via c-KIT induction. BMP2 also induced EMT of EC cells, and promoted migration by induction of SLUG. The BMP receptor kinase inhibitor LDN193189 augmented the growth inhibitory effects of carboplatin. Analyses of mRNAs of several BMP antagonists revealed that TWSG1 mRNA was abundantly expressed in Ishikawa cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Two Novel Mutations in the NOG Gene Associated With
    Journal of Human Genetics (2015) 60, 27–34 & 2015 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved 1434-5161/15 www.nature.com/jhg ORIGINAL ARTICLE Identification of two novel mutations in the NOG gene associated with congenital stapes ankylosis and symphalangism Akira Ganaha1,3, Tadashi Kaname2,3, Yukinori Akazawa1,3, Teruyuki Higa1,3, Ayano Shinjou1,3, Kenji Naritomi2,3 and Mikio Suzuki1,3 In this study, we describe three unrelated Japanese patients with hearing loss and symphalangism who were diagnosed with proximal symphalangism (SYM1), atypical multiple synostosis syndrome (atypical SYNS1) and stapes ankylosis with broad thumb and toes (SABTT), respectively, based on the clinical features. Surgical findings in the middle ear were similar among the patients. By next-generation and Sanger sequencing analyses, we identified two novel mutations, c.559C4G (p.P178A) and c.682T4A (p.C228S), in the SYM1 and atypical SYNS1 families, respectively. No pathogenic changes were found in the protein-coding regions, exon–intron boundaries or promoter regions of the NOG, GDF5 or FGF9 genes in the SABTT family. Such negative molecular data suggest there may be further genetic heterogeneity underlying SYNS1, with the involvement of at least one additional gene. Stapedotomy resulted in good hearing in all patients over the long term, indicating no correlation between genotype and surgical outcome. Given the overlap of the clinical features of these syndromes in our patients and the molecular findings, the diagnostic term ‘NOG-related-symphalangism spectrum disorder (NOG-SSD)’ is advocated and an unidentified gene may be responsible for this disorder. Journal of Human Genetics (2015) 60, 27–34; doi:10.1038/jhg.2014.97; published online 13 November 2014 INTRODUCTION However, as the GDF5 protein interacts with the NOG protein,14,15 Proximal symphalangism (SYM1) with conductive hearing loss was the diagnostic category of NOG-SSD does appear to be promising.
    [Show full text]
  • BMPR2 Mutations in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension with Congenital Heart Disease
    Copyright #ERS Journals Ltd 2004 Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 371–374 European Respiratory Journal DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00018604 ISSN 0903-1936 Printed in UK – all rights reserved BMPR2 mutations in pulmonary arterial hypertension with congenital heart disease K.E. Roberts*, J.J. McElroy#, W.P.K. Wong*, E. Yen*, A. Widlitz}, R.J. Barst}, J.A. Knowles#,z,§, J.H. Morse* # } BMPR2 mutations in pulmonary arterial hypertension with congenital heart disease. Depts ofz *Medicine, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, K.E. Roberts, J.J. McElroy, W.P.K. Wong, E. Yen, A. Widlitz, R.J. Barst, J.A. Knowles, and the Columbia Genome Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, J.H. Morse. #ERS Journals Ltd 2004. § ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to determine if patients with both and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA. pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), due to pulmonary vascular obstructive disease, and congenital heart defects (CHD), have mutations in the gene encoding bone Correspondence: J.H. Morse, Dept of Medi- morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR)-2. cine, Columbia University College of Physi- The BMPR2 gene was screened in two cohorts: 40 adults and 66 children with PAH/ cians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. CHD. CHDs were patent ductus arteriosus, atrial and ventricular septal defects, partial Fax: 1 2123054943 anomalous pulmonary venous return, transposition of the great arteries, atrioventicular E-mail: [email protected] canal, and rare lesions with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Six novel missense BMPR2 mutations were found in three out of four adults with Keywords: Bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 mutations complete type C atrioventricular canals and in three children.
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Reagents Single Color Antibodies CD Chart
    CD CHART CD N° Alternative Name CD N° Alternative Name CD N° Alternative Name Beckman Coulter Clone Beckman Coulter Clone Beckman Coulter Clone T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells T Cells B Cells Granulocytes NK Cells Macrophages/Monocytes Platelets Erythrocytes Stem Cells Dendritic Cells Endothelial Cells Epithelial Cells CD1a T6, R4, HTA1 Act p n n p n n S l CD99 MIC2 gene product, E2 p p p CD223 LAG-3 (Lymphocyte activation gene 3) Act n Act p n CD1b R1 Act p n n p n n S CD99R restricted CD99 p p CD224 GGT (γ-glutamyl transferase) p p p p p p CD1c R7, M241 Act S n n p n n S l CD100 SEMA4D (semaphorin 4D) p Low p p p n n CD225 Leu13, interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1). p p p p p CD1d R3 Act S n n Low n n S Intest CD101 V7, P126 Act n p n p n n p CD226 DNAM-1, PTA-1 Act n Act Act Act n p n CD1e R2 n n n n S CD102 ICAM-2 (intercellular adhesion molecule-2) p p n p Folli p CD227 MUC1, mucin 1, episialin, PUM, PEM, EMA, DF3, H23 Act p CD2 T11; Tp50; sheep red blood cell (SRBC) receptor; LFA-2 p S n p n n l CD103 HML-1 (human mucosal lymphocytes antigen 1), integrin aE chain S n n n n n n n l CD228 Melanotransferrin (MT), p97 p p CD3 T3, CD3 complex p n n n n n n n n n l CD104 integrin b4 chain; TSP-1180 n n n n n n n p p CD229 Ly9, T-lymphocyte surface antigen p p n p n
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Standard Deviation MTOR 0.12553731 PRPF38A
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Gut Gene Standard Deviation MTOR 0.12553731 PRPF38A 0.141472605 EIF2B4 0.154700091 DDX50 0.156333027 SMC3 0.161420017 NFAT5 0.166316903 MAP2K1 0.166585267 KDM1A 0.16904912 RPS6KB1 0.170330192 FCF1 0.170391706 MAP3K7 0.170660513 EIF4E2 0.171572093 TCEB1 0.175363093 CNOT10 0.178975095 SMAD1 0.179164705 NAA15 0.179904998 SETD2 0.180182498 HDAC3 0.183971158 AMMECR1L 0.184195031 CHD4 0.186678211 SF3A3 0.186697697 CNOT4 0.189434633 MTMR14 0.189734199 SMAD4 0.192451524 TLK2 0.192702667 DLG1 0.19336621 COG7 0.193422331 SP1 0.194364189 PPP3R1 0.196430217 ERBB2IP 0.201473001 RAF1 0.206887192 CUL1 0.207514271 VEZF1 0.207579584 SMAD3 0.208159809 TFDP1 0.208834504 VAV2 0.210269344 ADAM17 0.210687138 SMURF2 0.211437666 MRPS5 0.212428684 TMUB2 0.212560675 SRPK2 0.216217428 MAP2K4 0.216345366 VHL 0.219735582 SMURF1 0.221242495 PLCG1 0.221688351 EP300 0.221792349 Sundar R, et al. Gut 2020;0:1–10. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320805 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Gut MGAT5 0.222050228 CDC42 0.2230598 DICER1 0.225358787 RBX1 0.228272533 ZFYVE16 0.22831803 PTEN 0.228595789 PDCD10 0.228799406 NF2 0.23091035 TP53 0.232683696 RB1 0.232729172 TCF20 0.2346075 PPP2CB 0.235117302 AGK 0.235416298
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the TGF- Co-Receptor Endoglin in Cancer
    1 The role of the TGF- co-receptor endoglin in cancer Eduardo Pérez-Gómez1,†, Gaelle del Castillo1, Juan Francisco Santibáñez2, Jose Miguel López-Novoa3, Carmelo Bernabéu4 and 1,* Miguel Quintanilla . 1Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28029-Madrid, Spain; 2Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrado, Belgrado, Serbia; 3Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación Nefrológica, Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 4Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] † Current address: Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular I, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain *Corresponding author 2 ABSTRACT Endoglin (CD105) is an auxiliary membrane receptor of transforming growth factor- (TGF-) that interacts with type I and type II TGF- receptors and modulates TGF- signalling. Mutations in endoglin are involved in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia type I, a disorder characterized by cutaneous telangiectasias, epistaxis (nosebleeds) and major arteriovenous shunts, mainly in liver and lung. Endoglin is overexpressed in the tumor-associated vascular endothelium where it modulates angiogenesis. This feature makes endoglin a promising target for antiangiogenic cancer therapy. Recent studies on human and experimental models of carcinogenesis point to an important tumor cell-autonomous role of endoglin by regulating proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis. These studies suggest that endoglin behaves as a suppressor of malignancy in experimental and human carcinogenesis. In this review, we evaluate the implication of endoglin in tumor development underlying studies developed in our laboratories in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouse GDF-5/BMP-14 Biotinylated Antibody Antigen Affinity-Purified Polyclonal Goat Igg Catalog Number: BAF853
    Mouse GDF-5/BMP-14 Biotinylated Antibody Antigen Affinity-purified Polyclonal Goat IgG Catalog Number: BAF853 DESCRIPTION Species Reactivity Mouse Specificity Detects mouse GDF­5/BMP­14 in Western blots. In Western blot, approximately 20% cross­reactivity with recombinant mouse (rm) GDF­6 is observed and less than 1% cross­reactivity with rmGDF­1, rmGDF­8, and rmGDF­9 is observed. Source Polyclonal Goat IgG Purification Antigen Affinity­purified Immunogen E. coli­derived recombinant mouse GDF­5/BMP­14 Ala376­Arg495 Accession # P43027 Formulation Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS with BSA as a carrier protein. See Certificate of Analysis for details. APPLICATIONS Please Note: Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each application. General Protocols are available in the Technical Information section on our website. Recommended Sample Concentration Western Blot 0.1 µg/mL Recombinant Mouse GDF­5 (Catalog # 853­G5) Immunohistochemistry 5­15 µg/mL Immersion fixed frozen sections of mouse embryo (E13.5­15.5) PREPARATION AND STORAGE Reconstitution Reconstitute at 0.2 mg/mL in sterile PBS. Shipping The product is shipped at ambient temperature. Upon receipt, store it immediately at the temperature recommended below. Stability & Storage Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze­thaw cycles. l 12 months from date of receipt, ­20 to ­70 °C as supplied. l 1 month, 2 to 8 °C under sterile conditions after reconstitution. l 6 months, ­20 to ­70 °C under sterile conditions after reconstitution. BACKGROUND Growth Differentiation Factor 5 (GDF­5), also known as cartilage­derived morphogenetic protein 1 (CDMP­1), is a member of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family which belongs to the transforming growth factor β (TGF­β) superfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrna Kinome Screen Identifies TBK1 As a Therapeutic Target for HER2 Breast Cancer
    Published OnlineFirst January 31, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2138 Cancer Tumor and Stem Cell Biology Research shRNA Kinome Screen Identifies TBK1 as a Therapeutic Target for HER2þ Breast Cancer Tao Deng1, Jeff C. Liu1, Philip E.D. Chung1, David Uehling2, Ahmed Aman2, Babu Joseph2, Troy Ketela3, Zhe Jiang1, Nathan F. Schachter4, Robert Rottapel5, Sean E. Egan4, Rima Al-awar2,6, Jason Moffat3, and Eldad Zacksenhaus1 Abstract þ HER2 breast cancer is currently treated with chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 inhibitors. Many patients do not respond or relapse with aggressive metastatic disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new therapeutics that þ can target HER2 breast cancer and potentiate the effect of anti-HER2 inhibitors, in particular those that can target tumor-initiating cells (TIC). Here, we show that MMTV-Her2/Neu mammary tumor cells cultured as nonadherent spheres or as adherent monolayer cells select for stabilizing mutations in p53 that "immortalize" the cultures and that, after serial passages, sphere conditions maintain TICs, whereas monolayer cells gradually lose these tumorigenic cells. Using tumorsphere formation as surrogate for TICs, we screened p53-mutant þ Her2/Neu tumorsphere versus monolayer cells with a lentivirus short hairpin RNA kinome library. We identified kinases such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase and the TGFbR protein family, previously implicated þ in HER2 breast cancer, as well as autophagy factor ATG1/ULK1 and the noncanonical IkB kinase (IKK), þ TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), which have not been previously linked to HER2 breast cancer. Knockdown of TBK1 or pharmacologic inhibition of TBK1 and the related protein, IKKe, suppressed growth of both mouse þ and human HER2 breast cancer cells.
    [Show full text]