Thermal Degradation of Tetrafluoroethylene and Hydrofluoroethylene Polymers in a Vacuum!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thermal Degradation of Tetrafluoroethylene and Hydrofluoroethylene Polymers in a Vacuum! Journal of Research 01 the National Bureau of Standards Vol. 51, No.6, December 1953 Research Paper 2461 Thermal Degradation of Tetrafluoroethylene and Hydrofluoroethylene Polymers in a Vacuum! S. L. Madorsky, v. E. Hart, S. Straus, and V. A. Sedlak * Te fl on and tetrafluoroethylene photopolymers, on py rolysis in a vacuum at 423.5 0 to 513.00 C, yield almost J 00 perce nt of monomer. The rate of formation of monomer at a n.,· given temperat ure fo llows a first-order react ion and is independent of t he method of prepara­ tion of poly mer or its initial average molecular weight. The activation energy was deter­ mined by a pressure method and a weigh t method, and a value of 80.5 kcal was found b.'· both methods. A prelimina ry heating of Teflo n in air at 400 0 to 470 0 C did not change appreciably its rate of degradation into monomer when it was subse quently heated in a yacuum. Polyvinyl fluoride, 1,I-polyvin y li dene fluoride, and polytrifluoroethylene were pyrolyzed in t he range 372 0 to 5000 C. The volatiles consisted in all cases of HF and a wax-like material consisting of chain fragments of low volatility. Polyvinyl fluoride and polytrifl uoroethylene degrade to co mplete volatilization, whereas 1,1-poly vinyli dene fluoride becomes stabilized at about 70-percent loss of we ig ht. The rate-of-volat ilization curves indi­ cate a fi l'st-order reaction for polyvinyl fluo ri de, a zero-order reaction fo r t rifluoroethylene, alld an undeterm in ed order for 1,1-polyvinyli dene fluoride. The order of t hermal stabili ty for t hese poly mers, as com pared with polymethylene, is as follows: Poly vinyl f1uoride < polymeth,vlene < polytrifluoroethylene< ] . J -polyvi nylidene f1uoridc < polytetrafluoroeth ylene. 1. Introduction TAB I,E 1. Che mical analysis of hydTojluorocaTbon polymers There is very little in t Il e literature on the therma l AnalysiS degradation of fluorocarbons, in general, or on Carbon Ilydrogen F luorine rr otal fluorocarbon polymers, ill par ticular. Swarts [1 ),2 fo u nd Rogers and Cady [2], and Steunenberg and Cady [3) ~'heo. , --- ~'~~0~1-- Theo· . pyrolyzed a number of low molecular weigh t fluoro­ rrtical I'ound re ti ea l Found retiral l' ound carbons in tbe presence of a glowing platinum filament. Lewis and Naylor [4l pyrolyzed polytet­ 0/,1 % % % % % % 41. 2 41. 0 99.5 0 0 Pol Y\'inyl flu ori de .. 52.2 52.0 0.0 6.5 rafluoroethylene at 600 and 700 C and at press ures Po l ~' vi ny l id e n c fluoride ........... 37.5 3i.4 3.2 3. 2 59.3 58.5 99. I varying from 5 to 760 mm. Hg. The volatiles consisted l'olytrifluoro ethyl· of C2F 4 , C3F 6 , and C4Fg . In this work a study was ene. ______________ 29.0 29.7 1.5 1. 5 69.5 68. 0 99.2 made of the thermal degradation of a series of fluoropolymers to determine their r elative thermal 3. Apparatus and Experimental Procedure stability, the nature and relative amounts of the volatiles given off, and th e rates of thermal degrada­ The investigation of thermal d eCTradation of this tion. This series includes polytetrafluoroethylene series of polym ers was carried out along two lines. (Tefl on) [- C2F 4- ln , polyvinyl fluoride [- CzHaF- l., 1. Pyrolysis in a vacuum and .fj·actionation and analysis of the 1,1-polyvinylidene fluoride [- C H2F2- ln, and poly­ volatile pTodllcts. This procedure was followed for all of the z polymers, except Tefl on, using a Dewar-like molecular still , trifluoroethylene [- CzHF a- ln. which has been described in previous papers [6, 7). A 20- to 30-mg sample, either in solution or in fin ely divided from, was spread on a platinum t ray. Size of t he sample was limited so 2 . Materials Used as to prevent loss of materi a l by spattering during p yrolysis. The sample was first subjected t o a prelimi nary hea ting in a The polytetrafluoroe(;hylene was a commercial vacuum for 2 hr at about 1500 C in order to eliminate th e Teflon tape, 0.07 mm tbick. The polyvinyl fluoride solven t and adsorbed gases. It was t hen brought to the temperature of pyrolysis by heatin g fO l' 45 min, and this and the polyvinylidene fluoride were prepared by temperature was then maintain ed for 20 min. The following E . 1. du Pont de Nemours & Co. The polytri­ fractions were co ll ected: I, residue; II, a waxlike material, fluol'oethylene was prepared from the monomer by nonvolatile in a vacuum at room temperature ; III, a fractiOn photopolymerization at - 20 ° C in the presence of volat ile at room temperature; IV, a gaseous fraction noneOll­ densable at the temperat ure of li quid nitrogen. \Veights of all di-tert-bu tyl peroxide and then heated ovel'llight at four fractions were determined, and, in t he case of fractions 105° C .3 Analyses for C , H , and F in th e hydro­ III and IV, chemi cal composition was determined by means of fluorocarbon polymers are given in table 1. t he mass spectrometer. T o facilitate mass-spectrometric a nalysis, fraction III was further subdivided by distillation ' Present address: U. S. Public H ealth, A tlanta, Ga. into a li gh t fraction, lIlA, and a heavy fraction IlIB. For I ~rhig work was performed as a part of the research project on high-temperaLure­ T ef1 on, which requires a higher temperature of pyrolysis and r~si s tant pol ymers sponROred by the Ordnance Corps, D epartment of the Army. T he paper was presented at the !24th meeting of the American Chemical Socict)' , which yields almost 100 percent of monomer , a different type Polymer Chemistry Division, September 1953. of apparatus was used. , Figures in brackets in dicate the literature references at tbe end of this paper . 2. Rate oj volatilization oj polymers in a vacuum. This • The monomer and polymer were prepared by R. E. Florin and D. W . Brown, of the Polymer Structure Section of t),e National Bureau of Standards. The property was investigated in t he case of all poly mers by a monomer was prepared by the method of Park, Sharrah, and Lacher [51. weight method, and in the case of Teflon , also by a pressur c 327 method. The spring-balance apparatus u'sed in the weight Rates of volatilization of Teflon were determined from method is described in a previous paper [8]. The sample was the pressure developed in the calibrated volume. The limited to 5 to 8 mg in order to avoid loss by spattering during pressure was measured at time intervals by means of a multi­ the heating. It was placed in a platinum crucible, and the plying manometer, F, containing a low-vapor-pressure silicone ) crucible was suspended by means of a 3-mil tungsten wire from oil in the left arm of the manometer on top of a mercury a sensitive tungsten-spring balance, enclosed in a Pyrex column. The manometer was calibrated by means of a housing, which could be evacuated to about 10- 6 mm Hg. three-scale McLeod gage, reading to 25 mm Hg, with a The crucible was heated externally, and loss of weight of the precision of 0.2 percent. The scale on the multiplying sample was determined by observing a crossline on an exten­ manometer could be read with a precision of 0.02 mm. sion of the spring. Pressures up to 6 mm were measured. An apparatus for the study of rate of thermal degradation A sample of the fraction noncondensable at the temperature of Teflon by the pressure method is shown diagrammatically of liquid nitrogen, corresponding to fraction IV when t he in figure 1. In this figure, A is a quartz tube, 3 cm long, D ewar-like apparatus is used for pyrolysis, was obtained in 6-mm inside diameter, and 8-mm outside diameter, closed the following manner. Liquid nitrogen was placed around at one end. This tube fits into a larger quartz tube, B, trap L. The condensable material, corresponding to fraction closed at one end. Tube B is sealed to a Pyrex ground joint, III, condensed in this trap, while fraction IV remained sus­ C, by means of a graded seal. Samples weighing from 5 to pended in the space between pump E and stopcock D. 345 mg were used in this apparatus. If spattering occurred Stopcock H over tube G was closed, and the tube was sealed during pyrolysis, it would not result in loss of material in off at K. The contents of tube G were analyzed in the mass this apparatus. This apparatus was also used in t he study spectrometer. The weight of fraction IV was determined of pyrolysis of Teflon. from its pressure, total volume, and analysis. A cylindrical electric heater, not shown in the figure, was To obtain a sample of fraction III for analysis, the system designed to maintain a uniform temperature at its center for was evacuated while trap L was still immersed in liquid nitro­ a distance of about 4 em. This heater could be moved in gen. With stopcock D closed, fraction III was then allowed a fixed horizontal position, so that tube A fitted approxi­ to expand into the apparatus by removing liquid nitrogen mately in the center of the heater muffle.
Recommended publications
  • Safety Assessment of Polyfluorinated Polymers As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Polyfluorinated Polymers as Used in Cosmetics Status: Tentative Report for Public Comment Release Date: June 13, 2018 Panel Date: September 24-25, 2018 All interested persons are provided 60 days from the above date to comment on this safety assessment and to identify additional published data that should be included or provide unpublished data which can be made public and included. Information may be submitted without identifying the source or the trade name of the cosmetic product containing the ingredient. All unpublished data submitted to CIR will be discussed in open meetings, will be available at the CIR office for review by any interested party and may be cited in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Please submit data, comments, or requests to the CIR Executive Director, Dr. Bart Heldreth. The 2018 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Executive Director is Bart Heldreth, Ph.D. This report was prepared by Wilbur Johnson, Jr., M.S., Senior Scientific Analyst and Jinqiu Zhu, Ph.D., Toxicologist. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L STREET, NW, SUITE 1200 ◊ WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4702 ◊ PH 202.331.0651 ◊ FAX 202.331.0088 ◊ [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of polyfluorinated polymers in cosmetic products, and most of these ingredients have the film former function in common.
    [Show full text]
  • Miller-Stephenson Material Safety Data Sheet
    miller-stephenson Material Safety Data Sheet 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT/COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Name: MS-122XD Product Use: Release Agent or Dry Lubricant DPMS-Z0612A PTFE Release Agent/Dry Lubricant MANUFACTURER/DISTRIBUTOR: Emergency Phone Number: (800) 424-9300 Milier-Stephenson Chemical George Washington Highway Danbury, Conn. 06810 USA (203) 743-4447 Date Revised: May 2011 2. INGREDIENTS Material (s) CAS No. Approximate % 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane 811-97-2 80-90 2,3 Dihydroperfluoropentane (HFC-43-lOmee) 138495-42-8 9- 15 Poly-TFE, Omega-Hydro-Alpha-(Methylcyclohexyl)- 65530-85-0 1 -2 Poly-Tetrafluoroethylene 9002-84-0 <1 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Milky, white, liquid with a faint ethereal odor, packaged in an aerosol container. Potential Health Effects 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane INHALATION: Misuse or intentional inhalation abuse may cause death without warning symptoms, due to cardiac effects. Other symptoms may include, anaethetic effects, light-headedness, dizziness, confusion, incoordination, drowsiness, or unconsciousness, irregular heartbeat with a strange sensation in the chest, heart thumping, apprehension, feeling of fainting and weakness. Vapors are heavier than air and can cause suffocation by reducing oxygen available for breathing. SKIN: Contact with hquid or refrigerated gas can cause cold bums and frostbite. May cause skin irritation with discomfort, itching, redness or swelling. EYE: Contact with liquid or refrigerated gas can cause cold bums and frostbite. May cause eye irritation with tearing, redness and discomfort. MS-122XD Page 2 of 7 2,3 Dihydroperfluoropentane (HrC-43-lOmee) INHALATION: Gross overexposure by inhalation may cause suffocation if air is displaced by vapors and central nervous system stimulation with increased activity or sleeplessness, tremors or convulsions.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
    PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID 1. Exposure Data 1.1.2 Structural and molecular formulae, and relative molecular mass: straight-chain 1.1 Identification of the agent isomer 1.1.1 Nomenclature F FFF F F F O F Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 335-67-1 OH Chem. Abstr. Serv. Name: Perfluorooctanoic FFF F F F F acid Molecular formula: C8HF15O2 IUPAC Name: 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8- Relative molecular mass: 414 pentadecafluorooctanoic acid Synonyms: PFOA; pentadecafluoro-1-octan - 1.1.3 Chemical and physical properties of the oic acid; pentadecafluoro-n-octanoic acid; pure substance: straight-chain isomer pentadecaflurooctanoic acid; perfluoro- caprylic acid; perfluoroctanoic acid; From HSDB (2014), unless otherwise perfluoroheptanecarboxylic acid; APFO; indicated ammonium perfluorooctanoate Description: White to off-white powder Isomers and Salts: There are 39 possible struc- Boiling point: 192.4 °C tural isomers of pentadecafluorooctanoic acid (1 with chain length 8, 5 with chain Melting point: 54.3 °C length 7, 13 with chain length 6, 16 with chain Density: 1.792 g/cm3 at 20 °C length 5, and 4 with chain length 4). These Solubility: 9.5 g/L in water at 25 °C isomers can also exist as the ammonium, Vapour pressure: 0.0023 kPa at 20 °C (extrap- sodium, or potassium salt (Nielsen, 2012). olated); 0.127 kPa at 59.25 °C (measured) Fig. 1.1 presents the few isomers and salts (ATSDR, 2009); 0.070 kPa at 25 °C that have Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Stability: When heated to decomposition it references.
    [Show full text]
  • DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS of FLUOROCARBON POLYMERS
    criteria for a recommended standard . occupational exposure to DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS of FLUOROCARBON POLYMERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE criteria for a recommended standard... OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS of FLUOROCARBON POLYMERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service Center for Disease Control National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health September 1977 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77-193 PREFACE The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 emphasizes the need for standards to protect the health and safety of workers exposed to an ever-increasing number of potential hazards at their workplace. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has projected a formal system of research, with priorities determined on the basis of specified indices, to provide relevant data from which valid criteria for effective standards can be derived. Recommended standards for occupational exposure, which are the result of this work, are based on the health effects of exposure. The Secretary of Labor will weigh these recommendations along with other considerations such as feasibility and means of implementation in developing regulatory standards. It is intended to present successive reports as research and epidemiologic studies are completed and as sampling and analytical methods are developed. Criteria and standards will be reviewed periodically to ensure continuing protection of the worker. I am pleased to acknowledge the contributions to this report on the decomposition products of fluorocarbon polymers by members of the NIOSH staff and the valuable constructive comments by the Review Consultants on the Decomposition Products of Fluorocarbon Polymers and by Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrafluoroethylene
    TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE Tetrafluoroethylene was reviewed previously by the Working Group in 1979, 1987, and 1998 (IARC, 1979, 1987, 1999). New data have since become available, and these have been incor- porated, and taken into consideration in the present evaluation. 1. Exposure Data 1.1.3 Chemical and physical properties of the pure substance 1.1 Identification of the agent From IFA (2014), unless otherwise indicated 1.1.1 Nomenclature Description: Colourless gas, odourless or sometimes described as having a faint Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 116-14-3 sweetish odour; extremely flammable Chem. Abstr. Serv. Name: Tetrafluoroethylene Boiling point: −75.63 °C IUPAC Systematic Name: Melting point: −131.15 °C (HSDB, 2014) 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethene Density: 4216 kg/m3 at 15 °C at 1 bar Synonyms: Perfluoroethylene, Perfluoroethene, Solubility: Slightly soluble in water, 159 mg/L Ethylene tetrafluoro-, tetrafluoroethene at 25 °C (HSDB, 2014) Vapour pressure: 2947 kPa and 20 °C 1.1.2 Structural and molecular formulae, and Stability: Decomposes into fluorine and fluo- relative molecular mass rine compounds when heated (HSDB, 2014) Reactivity: A terpene inhibitor (limonene) is F F generally added to the monomer to prevent CC spontaneous polymerization. F F Risk of explosion in contact with air or in the absence of air at elevated temperatures and/or Molecular formula: C2F4 pressures (> 600 °C and 100 kPa). The stabilized Relative molecular mass: 100.01 monomer is flammable in air if ignited (flamma- bility limits: lower, 11%; upper, 60%) producing soot and carbon tetrafluoride Babenko( et al., 1993; HSDB, 2014). Incompatible with polymerization catalysts and peroxides.
    [Show full text]
  • Freon™ 123 PUSH Bulletin
    Freon™ 123 Refrigerant (R-123) Properties, Uses, Storage, and Handling Freon™ 123 Refrigerant Table of Contents Shipping, Storage, and Handling ......................................16 Shipping Containers in the United States ..............................16 Introduction ...........................................................................3 Bulk Storage Systems ..........................................................................16 Background .......................................................................................................... 3 Storage, Handling, and Use Recommendations .................16 Freon™ 123—An Environmentally Acceptable Prohibited Uses ...................................................................................16 Alternative ....................................................................................................... 3 Personal Protective Equipment ................................................17 Uses .......................................................................................3 Storage ......................................................................................................17 Refrigerant ...................................................................................................... 4 Handling ....................................................................................................17 Heat-Transfer Fluid ....................................................................................4 Charging, Maintenance, and Sampling .................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Teflon™ FEP Fluoropolymer Resins
    Teflon™ FEP Fluoropolymer Resins Product and Properties Handbook Teflon™ FEP Fluoropolymer Resins Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Commercially Available Products . 3 Specifications . 3 General Properties of Teflon™ FEP . 3 Typical Properties of Teflon™ FEP . 3 Mechanical Properties . 3 Tensile Properties . 4 Flexural Modulus . 4 Compressive Stress . 5 Creep and Cold Flow . 5 Apparent Modulus of Elasticity . 5 Stress Relaxation . 5 Poisson’s Ratio . 9 Fatigue Resistance . 9 Impact Resistance . 9 Hardness . 10 Friction . 10 Thermal Properties . 10 Electrical Properties . 11. Chemical Resistance . 11 Absorption . 11 Permeability . 11 Weathering . 11 Cryogenic Service . .11 Mildew Resistance . 13 FDA Compliance . 13 Optical Properties . 13 Fabrication Techniques . 13 Forming and Fabrication . 14 Choose Correct Working Speeds . 14 Properly Shape and Use Tools . 14 Rules for Dimensioning and Finishing . 15 Closer Tolerances . 15 Measuring Tolerances . 15 Surface Finishes . 15 Safety Precautions . 15 2 Teflon™ FEP Fluoropolymer Resins Introduction Specifications Teflon™ FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) is The ASTM material specification covering Teflon™ FEP chemically a copolymer of hexafluoropropylene fluoropolymer resin is D2116. Teflon™ FEP fluoropolymer and tetrafluoroethylene. It differs from PTFE resin is also called out in various industrial and military (polytetrafluoroethylene) resins, in that it is melt- specifications for tubing, molded parts, and film, as well as processible using conventional injection molding and numerous
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluoroalkylated Acids and Related Compounds (PFAS) in the Swedish Environment
    Perfluoroalkylated acids and related compounds (PFAS) in the Swedish environment Chemistry Sources Exposure Ulf Järnberg Katrin Holmström Department of Applied Environmental Science, ITM Stockholm University Bert van Bavel Anna Kärrman Man Technology and Science, MTM Örebro University I Preface This report summarizes the results of several investigations conducted in Sweden during the years 2002-2005 concerning perfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS). The projects were mainly funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (S- EPA) within the environmental monitoring programs but for this compilation results from other investigations have also been included to provide a more complete overview of the present situation regarding the use of and pollution status for PFAS in Sweden. These investigations were funded by the Swedish Rescue Services Agency, the Regional County of Västra Götaland, Svenskt Vatten (VA-forsk grant nr.23:101 ) and the Nordic Council. This report also contains a compilation of literature data and information gathered from representatives of Swedish companies, authorities, and organisations. Patent information has been included and referenced in order to provide a more general picture of highly fluorinated organic compounds. It should be stressed however, that patent descriptions relate to the potential use and do not necessarily reflect the actual use. A list of information sources is given at the end of the report. The beginning of the report provides an outline of fluorinated organic compounds in general and is intended to provide a basis for the following detailed descriptions of the perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that where selected by the S-EPA and Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate (KemI) for initial screening in the Swedish urban environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134A) (CAS No. 811-97-2) (Second Edition)
    1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) (CAS No. 811-97-2) (Second Edition) JACC No. 50 ISSN-0773-6339-50 Brussels, January 2006 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) (CAS No. 811-97-2) (Second Edition) ECETOC JACC REPORT No. 50 © Copyright – ECETOC AISBL European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals 4 Avenue E. Van Nieuwenhuyse (Bte 6), B-1160 Brussels, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Applications to reproduce, store, copy or translate should be made to the Secretary General. ECETOC welcomes such applications. Reference to the document, its title and summary may be copied or abstracted in data retrieval systems without subsequent reference. The content of this document has been prepared and reviewed by experts on behalf of ECETOC with all possible care and from the available scientific information. It is provided for information only. ECETOC cannot accept any responsibility or liability and does not provide a warranty for any use or interpretation of the material contained in the publication. ECETOC JACC No. 50 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) (CAS No. 811-97-2) (Second Edition) 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) (CAS No. 811-97-2) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 THE ECETOC SCHEME FOR THE JOINT ASSESSMENT OF COMMODITY CHEMICALS 3 1. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 4 2. IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL METHODS 6 2.1 Identity 6 2.2 EU classification and labelling 6 2.3 Physical and chemical properties 6 2.4 Conversion factors 8 2.5 Analytical methods 8 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Safe Handling of Tetrafluoroethylene November 2017
    Guide for the Safe Handling of Tetrafluoroethylene November 2017 This guide was developed by the PlasticsEurope TFE Safety Task Force. The Task Force was founded in 2003 and consists of experts working for fluoropolymer production companies all over the world (See Appendix A). The primary goal of the PlasticsEurope TFE Safety Task Force is to enhance the safe handling of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) by sharing relevant information and indentifying gaps in the know-how and investigating these. For this purpose, various research projects have been carried out over the past 10 years. This guide summarizes our most important findings and provides current state-of-the-art guidance in the safe TFE handling practices. The main contributors to this guide were: Dr. Fabio Ferrero, independent consultant, has been collaborating with the PlasticsEurope TFE Safety Task Force since 2008. During his 8-year-experience at BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany, he worked on many TFE-related projects and provided valuable publications on TFE safety. Dr. Martyn Shenton has been a member of the PlasticsEurope TFE Safety Task Force since 2003 and became chairperson of the group in May 2017. He has over 15 years experience of handling TFE at AGC Chemicals Europe, Ltd. and is the company’s Global TFE Safety Expert, a position he has held for over a decade. Davide Bellucci, fluoropolymers process technologist at Solvay Specialty Polymers, has over 10 years experience of TFE safe handling. He has been a member of the PlasticsEurope TFE Safety Task Force since 2012 and the group’s vice-chairperson since May 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Aspects Related to Hfc-23 By-Product Control Technologies (Decisions 78/5(E), 79/17(B), 79/47(E) and 80/77(B))
    UNITED NATIONS EP Distr. United Nations GENERAL Environment Programme UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/81/54 1 June 2018 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL Eighty-first Meeting Montreal, 18-22 June 2018 KEY ASPECTS RELATED TO HFC-23 BY-PRODUCT CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES (DECISIONS 78/5(E), 79/17(B), 79/47(E) AND 80/77(B)) Background 1. At the 79th meeting, the Executive Committee requested the Secretariat to contract an independent consultant to undertake an evaluation of cost-effective and environmentally sustainable options of HFC-23 destruction from HCFC-22 production facilities and submit this report to the 81st meeting. 2. The scope of the evaluation would include: (a) An assessment of the costs of incineration at an on-site destruction facility, based on characteristics of the facility, including destruction capacity, quantity and frequency of HFC-23 to be destroyed, the expected remaining lifetime, location, and other relevant factors, including: (i) Start-up costs for destruction facilities that might currently be in disuse; (ii) Costs to install a new destruction facility if one was not currently installed; (iii) Costs to operate a currently installed facility; (b) An assessment of the costs of incineration at an off-site destruction facility, including collection, transportation and incineration, based on the quantity of HFC-23 to be destroyed, location, and other relevant factors; (c) An assessment of the cost of destroying emissions of HFC-23 by-product through irreversible transformation and other new technologies, where information was available, based on the quantity of HFC-23 to be destroyed, location, and other relevant factors; Pre-session documents of the Executive Committee of the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol are without prejudice to any decision that the Executive Committee might take following issuance of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEL FLUOROELASTOMERS COMPOSED Of
    NOVEL FLUOROELASTOMERS COMPOSED of TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE and VINYLIDENE FLUORIDE OLIGOMERS SYNTHESIZED in CARBON DIOXIDE for USE in SOFT LITHOGRAPHY to ENABLE a PLATFORM for the FABRICATION of SHAPE- and SIZE-SPECIFIC, MONODISPERSE BIOMATERIALS Jennifer Yvonne Kelly A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Chemistry Chapel Hill 2008 Approved By Advisor: Joseph M. DeSimone Reader: Maurice Brookhart Reader: Ed Samulski Reader: Jeffrey Johnson Reader: Paul Resnick ©2008 Jennifer Yvonne Kelly ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JENNIFER YVONNE KELLY: Novel Fluoroelastomers Composed of Tetrafluoroethylene and Vinylidene Fluoride Oligomers Synthesized in Carbon Dioxide for Use in Soft Lithography to Enable a Platform for the Fabrication of Shape- and Size- Specific, Monodisperse Biomaterials (Under the direction of Dr. Joseph M. DeSimone) Fluorinated elastomers are materials with tremendous utility that have found use as minimally adhesive mold materials in soft lithography. The first objective of this research involved the synthesis of novel functional, fluorinated oligomers in supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) and the fabrication of the resulting fluorooligomers into solid elastomers using free radical crosslinking chemistry. Commercially available fluoroelastomers are typically synthesized in aqueous media using fluorinated surfactants or in non-aqueous conditions using fluorinated solvents. This research effort focused on the synthesis of low molecular weight oligomers consisting of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and vinylidene fluoride (VF2) with a cure site comonomer in scCO2 at low temperatures. Using CO2 as a polymerization medium allows for safe handling of TFE, is environmentally responsible by mitigating the typical generation of halogenated, organic, or aqueous waste, and circumvents the use of fluorinated surfactants as these copolymers are soluble in CO2.
    [Show full text]