DOCSLIB.ORG

THE World University Rankings 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE World University Rankings 2020 OVERALL PERFORMANCE 2020 2020 Rank 401-500 2019 Rank 501-600 In the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2020, Bournemouth University ranked 401-500 (up from 501-600 in 2019 and 601-800 in 2018) out of an increased list 1396 institutions worldwide (an additional 294 institutions since 2018). 1. METHODOLOGY This year’s table is based on the same 13 performance metrics used in previous years, covering a full range of activities including teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook. The most recent Academic Reputation Survey (run annually) underpins the teaching category and was carried out between November 2018 and March 2019. The 2019 data are combined with the results of the 2018 survey, giving more than 21,000 responses The performance indicators are grouped into five pillars: Teaching (the learning environment); Research (volume, income and reputation); Citations (research influence); International Outlook (staff, students and research); and Industry Income (knowledge transfer). The Pillars are blended in the following proportions: Teaching 30%, Research 30%, Citations 30%, International outlook 7.5%, Industry income 2.5%. This year, the bibliometric data supplier Elsevier examined almost 77.4 million citations to 12.8 million journal articles, article reviews, conference proceedings, books and book chapters published over five years. The data include over 23,400 academic journals indexed by Elsevier’s Scopus database and all indexed publications between 2014 and 2018. The University of Oxford tops the 2020 edition of the rankings for the fourth consecutive year, but most of the country’s other leading institutions have fallen. The University of Cambridge, Imperial College London, UCL, the London School of Economics and Political Science, and the University of Edinburgh – the UK’s next highest-ranked universities – have all dropped by one place. Overall, 18 of the 28 UK institutions ranked in the top 200 of the table have declined since last year. European institutions occupy 79 of the top 200 places; with the UK most-represented (28 institutions) followed by Germany (23) and the Netherlands (11). Further information on the THE World University Rankings may be found at www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. 2. BU PERFORMANCE BU overall scores have improved in four of the five areas, most notably for Teaching which has seen its score increase by 4.3 since 2019 resulting in an improved ranking of 356th in the table for this measure (up 108 places since 2019, and 663 places since 2018). An increase of 1.1 in BU’s research score since 2019 results in the pillar rank remaining static at 668th and an increase of 3.7 in the citation pillar score results in a 2 place increase in rank to 560th. Disappointingly, a reduction of 0.2 in the pillar score for Industry income has resulted in a steep fall in ranking (down 201 places since 2019 to 1208th). BU’s best performing area remains International Outlook where despite a small increase in pillar score (up 0.3) BU dropped 17 places to 184th in the overall table. 2020 2019 2020 2019 Pillar Data (Weighting) Metric (Weighting) Pillar Score Pillar Rank Pillar Score Pillar Rank Value Score Value Score Teaching reputation (15%) 10 4.4 7.1 3.9 Doctorate awarded to academic staff (6%) 0.11 100 0.09 81.3 Teaching (30%) 33.2 356 28.9 464 Students to academic staff (4.5%) 17.1 42.1 16.5 42.6 Doctorate to bachelor awarded (2.25%) 0.03 31.6 0.02 27.5 Institutional income to academic staff (2.25%) £193,429 31.1 £194,194 30.1 Research reputation (18%) 13.4 3.4 4.6 2 Research (30%) 18.7 668 17.6 668 Publications per staff (6%) - 56.8 - 55.8 Research income to academic staff (6%) £5,037 26.5 £5,997 26.2 Citations (30%) 55.5 560 51.8 562 Citation impact (30%) - 55.5 - 51.8 Percentage of international staff (2.5%) 28.5% 88.1 28% 86.2 International outlook (7.5%) 79.8 184 79.5 167 International co-authorship (2.5%) - 80.3 - 80 Percentage of international students (2.5%) 17.80% 70.9 19% 72.5 Industry income (2.5%) 34.8 1208 35 1007 Industry income to academic staff (2.5%) £431 34.8 £1,198 35 Performance/Rank better than previous year Performance/Rank same as previous year Performance/Rank worse than previous year PRIME | September 2019| 1 Looking at the performance metrics that make up the main pillars, BU has increased its overall score in 10 out of the 13 performance metrics. Three metric scores have declined since 2019 (students to academic staff; down 0.5, percentage of international students; down 1.6, and industry income to academic staff; down 0.2). Two financial metrics additionally decreased in value in 2020; institutional income to academic staff (decreased by £765) and research income to academic staff (decreased by £960) however, this has not translated into a decline in the resulting metric score (up 1.0 and 0.3 respectively). The three metrics which hold the greatest weighting, including two reputational measures, have all shown improved performance at BU since 2019. Teaching reputation (15%) is up 2.9 resulting in an increased score of 4.4 (up 0.5); research reputation (18%) is up 8.8 resulting in an increased score of 3.4 (up 1.4 and finally citation impact (value not available) has an increased score of 55.5 (up 3.7) The following chart shows BU’s performance against all institutions included in the worldwide rankings. BU is marked against the median, quartiles and top and bottom scores for each of the pillars. It should be noted that the top and bottom whiskers in the boxplot denote the highest and lowest data points within the 1.5 inter-quartile ranges of the respective quartiles therefore removing any institutional outliers within the data. The chart illustrates BU’s strong performance within the International Outlook pillar in comparison to all institutions measured in the worldwide data and performance above the median in the Teaching, Research and Citations pillars. Industry International Teaching Research Citations Income Outlook Worldwide - Top 56.4 57.5 100 70.7 99.7 Worldwide - 75% 33.6 30.1 72 49.8 62.8 Worldwide - Median 23.8 18 45.7 39.4 43.1 Worldwide - 25% 18.3 11.6 23.4 35.8 27.5 Worldwide - Bottom 11.2 6.8 1.7 34.4 13.1 *Shading indicates BU performance BU 2020 33.2 18.7 55.5 34.8 79.8 BU 2019 28.9 17.6 51.8 35.0 79.5 3. UK PERFORMANCE 2020 Among UK universities, the official ranking places BU joint 49th out of 100, up from joint 59th out of 98 last year. The table below shows BU’s ranked performance amongst the 100 UK institutions. BU has improved its UK ranking in only one pillar in 2020: teaching, up 8 places to 29th. The reduction in BU’s industry income has resulted in a 20 place fall to 75th out of the 10 UK providers, whilst the international outlook pillar has seen a fall of 4 places to 59th and the citations pillar has dropped 1 place to 63rd. The research pillar has remained static, ranking 59th in the UK. Rank in UK Industry International Rank Teaching Research Citations Income Outlook 2020 49 (401-500) 29 59 63 75 59 2019 59 (501-600) 37 59 62 55 55 Movement PRIME | September 2019| 2 4. INDICATIVE PERFORMANCE 2020 THE have determined that the group ranked in the 401-500 section of the table achieved an overall score between 38.8 and 42.3 (this group achieved between 37.1 and 41.6 in 2019). In analysing the data used to calculate the overall ranking position it is likely that BU’s score for 2019 was around 39.1, with an indicative rank of 490th (up from an indicative score of 36.3 with an indicative rank of 523rd in 2019, a rise of 33 places. The following data table shows performance data for all 100 UK institutions and has been re-sorted by this indicative ranking, placing BU 57th in the UK, up 5 places from 62nd in 2019. THE Indicative THE Indicative International Industry Official Name Teaching Research Citations Rank Overall Overall Outlook Income Rank 1 1 University of Oxford 95.4 95.4 90.5 99.6 98.4 96.4 65.5 3 3 University of Cambridge 94.4 94.4 91.4 98.7 95.8 95 59.3 10 10 Imperial College London 89.8 89.8 84.5 87.6 97 97.1 69.9 15 15 UCL 87.1 87.1 77.8 88.7 96.1 96.2 42.7 London School of Economics and 27 27 81.3 81.3 69 83 92.8 93.2 35.1 Political Science 30 30 University of Edinburgh 79.4 79.4 67.3 74.1 96.4 93.8 38.9 36 36 King’s College London 75.7 75.7 61.3 68.5 94.8 95.6 45.6 55 55 University of Manchester 69.7 69.7 56.9 63.8 85.2 91 44.7 77 77 University of Warwick 64.6 64.6 46.9 52.7 88.8 93.8 42.8 87 87 University of Bristol 63.2 63.2 41.8 48.4 95.5 86.6 40.9 99 99 University of Glasgow 62.2 62.2 41.1 47.9 91.8 92.3 40 110 110 Queen Mary University of London 61.3 61.3 35.3 43.1 98 96.7 44.1 112 112 University of Birmingham 60.9 60.9 39.6 45.6 92.1 89.2 39.3 117 117 University of Sheffield 60.1 60.1 45.2 46.4 83 87.3 45.8 122 122 University of Southampton 59.8 59.8 40.2 44.3 88 94.2 40.1 128 128 University of York 58.9 58.9 40.3 46.6 85.1 85.4 36.4 133 133 Durham University 58.5 58.5 45.5 47.8 75.5 91.7 37.9 139 139 Lancaster University 58 58.0 34.7 39.4 92.5 94.2 36 146 146 University of Exeter 57.4 57.4 33.9 38.9 92.4 91.9 37.8 146 146 University of Sussex 57.4 57.4 35.3 37.9 91.8 93.6 35.9 152 152 University of Nottingham 57.2 57.2 42.7 42.6 80.3 87.5 39.4 155 155 University of Leeds 57.1 57.1 41.1 45.9 78 87.5 39.9 165 165 University of Liverpool 56.3 56.3 35.2 37.5 88.8 92.2 38.8 166 166 University of Leicester 56.1 56.1 30.1 34.8 96.2 90.7 38.1 168 168 University of Aberdeen 56 56.0 30.4 33.3 95.2 95.7 45.8 192 192 University of East Anglia
Recommended publications
  • Pdp4life Regional Pilot Final Report

    Pdp4life Regional Pilot Final Report

    PDP4Life – Final Report – 2 – 17-07-07 JISC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Project Document Cover Sheet PROJECT FINAL REPORT Project Project Acronym PDP4Life Project ID Project Title PDP4Life: Personal Development Planning for Lifelong Learning Start Date 01-03-05 End Date 31-04-07 Lead Institution Bournemouth University Project Director Janet Hanson [email protected] Joint Project Managers Up to 6 Dec 06: & contact details Ken Bissell [email protected] Dr Barbara Newland [email protected] After 6 Dec 06: Steve Mason (contact via Project Director) Partner Institutions Arts Institute at Bournemouth; College of St Mark & St John (Marjon); Dartington College of Arts; Open University; University of Bristol; University of Gloucestershire; University of Plymouth; Weymouth College; University College Falmouth; University Centre Yeovil Project Web URL http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/asprojects/pdp4life/ Programme Name (and SW Regional e-learning pilot in Distributed e-learning programme number) Programme Manager Sarah Davies Document Document Title Project Final Report Reporting Period March 2005-April 2007 Author(s) & project role Janet Hanson, Project Director Steve Mason, Project Manager Date April 2007 Filename URL Access Project and JISC internal General dissemination Document History Version Date Comments 1 27 March 2006 Not published external to Bournemouth University 2 26 July 2007 Final version sent to JISC See Project Management Guidelines for information about assigning version numbers. Page 1 of 17 PDP4Life – Final
  • Stacking Chairs: Local Sense and Global Nonsense

    Stacking Chairs: Local Sense and Global Nonsense

    Short and Sweet i-Perception Stacking Chairs: Local Sense January-February 2018, 1–5 ! The Author(s) 2018 DOI: 10.1177/2041669517752372 and Global Nonsense journals.sagepub.com/home/ipe Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel University of Bristol, UK Hiroshi Ashida Kyoto University, Japan P. George Lovell University of Abertay Dundee, School of Social and Health Sciences, UK Tim S. Meese Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK D. Samuel Schwarzkopf University College London, UK Abstract We report a confusing stimulus which demonstrates the power of local interpretation of three- dimensional structure to disrupt a coherent global perception. Keywords 3D perception, depth, perception, illusion Figure 1 shows a photograph of nine stackable chairs, leaning back at an angle against a wall. For all observers (n ¼ 40þ, recruited ad hoc via Facebook, where the stimulus was displayed), this image elicits confusion. If the number of chairs is reduced below four, the effect disappears. Figure 2(a) is an annotated version of Figure 1. The local interpretation of three-dimensional structure – at each ‘corner’, i.e. AD, BC and EF – is generally unambiguous (apart from AD, which flips in depth in a Necker-cube-like manner for some observers). But the repetition of the stacked elements along the virtual contours AD, BC and, to a lesser extent, EF suggests a change in depth along those lines which does not actually exist. Figure 2(b) makes this explicit: an abstracted version of the image reveals an alternative interpretation, which fails to correspond to reality – the repetitive structure now looks more like a stack of quadrilaterals rising from the ground plane.
  • BU Travel Plan

    BU Travel Plan

    Bournemouth University Travel Plan 2019 - 2025 Bournemouth University Project number: 60577993 June 2019 Bournemouth University Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Matthew Squires Richard Adams Chris Carter Senior Consultant Associate Director Associate Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 1 11/01/2019 Draft for BU CC C. Carter AD Estates 2 04/02/2019 Draft for TPRG CC C. Carter AD 3 13/03/2019 Stage 2 CC C. Carter AD consultation 4 14/05/2019 Submission to CC C. Carter AD ULT 5 07/06/2019 Post ULT Review CC C. Carter AD Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Bournemouth University AECOM Bournemouth University Prepared for: Bournemouth University Prepared by: AECOM Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Bournemouth University AECOM Bournemouth University Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................
  • Access Agreement 2018-19

    Access Agreement 2018-19

    FALMOUTH UNIVERSITY ACCESS AGREEMENT 2018-19 ACCESS AGREEMENT SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE FOR FAIR ACCESS Submitted 25 April 2017; revised 22 June 2017 FALMOUTH UNIVERSITY ACCESS AGREEMENT 2018-19 Contents: 1. Introduction and OFFA priorities for 2018-19 page 3 2. Fees, student numbers and fee income page 5 3. Access, student success and progression measures page 7 4. Financial support page 15 5. Targets and milestones page 16 6. Monitoring and evaluation agreements page 16 7. Equality and Diversity page 16 8. Provision of information to prospective students page 17 9. Consulting with students page 17 Annex: Access Agreement Resource Plan, 2018-19 Page 2 of 18 1a. Introduction This Access Agreement sets out Falmouth University’s plans and targets to support access, student success and progression for the year 2018-19. This Agreement has been developed in the context of the University’s Strategic Plan for the period 2015 to 2020. The Strategic Plan’s key objectives reflect the University’s commitment to fair access across the student lifecycle. Our first objective is ‘to produce satisfied graduates who get great jobs’, which includes ambitious targets for student retention, student satisfaction and graduate employment. Our second objective is ‘to help grow Cornwall’, which includes a commitment to double the number of students recruited from the county from 2013-14 levels by 2020. This objective will be achieved through a sharpened focus on recruiting students from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Strategic Plan states: ‘We will work with other agencies in the region to build support systems to retain more of our creative talent for the benefit of Cornwall.
  • Avoiding Plagiarism

    Avoiding Plagiarism

    Avoiding Plagiarism An online course and software solution to ensure your students follow best practice in paraphrasing, referencing and citation Avoiding Plagiarism is an introductory course for undergraduate and postgraduate students which is suitable for all disciplines. This updated course will give you assurance that all your students have been adequately prepared for their assignments and provides your university with evidence that students have received training in how to avoid plagiarism, whether intentional or not. Key Features Student views Review quizzes Interviews with students Multiple choice quizzes to help giving their thoughts you learn what plagiarism is and 96% on plagiarism. test your knowledge. of students taking this course taking this course state it to be effective in improving their understand of how to avoid plagiarism. Scenarios Plagiarism in the news Practice exercises Interactive scenarios Online resources to help Interactive activities to help you that illustrate some of the extend your learning, identify plagiarism and practise situations you may encounter in including articles on real-life how to correctly cite and the course of your studies. cases of plagiarism. reference different sources. www.epigeum.com Are you confident that students at your institution: • Understand what plagiarism is and why avoiding it is so important? • Are familiar with the key terms associated with plagiarism and academic integrity? • Can identify the different types of plagarism? • Appreciate the importance of referencing and accurate citation? The syllabus includes: Student view Unit 1: What is plagiarism? The standard of the course What is plagiarism? is very high and is incredibly Unintentional plagiarism useful for students preparing Paraphrasing to write essays.
  • S, Tefania Simion

    S, Tefania Simion

    S, tefania Simion Email: [email protected], Updated October 2020 [email protected] Website: www.stefaniasimion.com FIELDS OF Economics of Education, Gender Economics, Labour Economics, INTERESTS WORK Lecturer, School of Economics, University of Bristol, 2019-present EXPERIENCE Senior Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Edinburgh 2016-2019 EDUCATION PhD Economics, Queen Mary University of London 2012-2017 MSc Economics, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics 2011-2012 MA(Hons) Economics, University of Edinburgh 2007-2011 PUBLICATIONS Charging for Higher Education: Estimating the Impact on Inequality and Student Outcomes (with G. Azmat) - The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Accepted. WORKING Pay Transparency and Cracks in the Glass Ceiling (with E. Duchini and A. Turrell), CAGE PAPERS working paper, no. 482 & RESEARCH IN PROGRESS Demographic Bulges and Labour Market Outcomes The Internationalisation of British Universities: a Dividend or a Deterrent? Are Girls Always More Likely to Give up? Evidence from a Natural Experiment with Low- Achieving Students (with A. Bizopoulou and R. Megalokonomou) Fluid Intelligence, Crystallised Intelligence and Financial Decisions (with T. Sulka) Gender Differences in Negative Exam Marking (with G. Azmat and M. Guell) UG TEACHING Lecturer and Course Organiser Econometrics 1, University of Bristol 2019-present Economics of Education, University of Edinburgh 2017-2019 Economics UG Dissertation Coordinator, University of Edinburgh 2017-2019 Intermediate Econometrics,
  • Bournemouth University (BU), a Superb, Careers-Focused Institution with Fantastic Teaching

    Bournemouth University (BU), a Superb, Careers-Focused Institution with Fantastic Teaching

    International Pathways Guide 2020–22 Welcome Follow your path to Bournemouth University (BU), a superb, careers-focused institution with fantastic teaching. With Kaplan Pathways, you can gain entry to a degree at BU by taking a pathway course on campus at Bournemouth University International College. 4–9 10–15 The university The destination Read about Bournemouth Discover the town of University, its excellent rankings, and Bournemouth, explore what there the facilities and resources available is to see and do in the local area, on campus. and where you will live during your pathway course. kaplanpathways.com/ bournemouth-university kaplanpathways.com/ bournemouth-life 16–27 The 28–31 international college Next steps Find out about the courses available Learn about the easy application at the international college, and see process, and use the digital course where you can go online for the most information booklet to find your up-to-date information. perfect study option. kaplanpathways.com/ kaplanpathways.com/ bournemouth bournemouth-apply 2 3 A place to Whoever you are, and wherever you're from, you'll feel right belong at home at BU. Bournemouth University (BU) is an innovative and inspiring place to study, and prides itself on preparing students for their future. Your educational experience at BU will be truly memorable. People come from all over the world to study at Bournemouth University. And although everyone will have a unique experience here, there are some things that everyone will find in common. Every student who comes to BU can benefit from the university's innovative, forward-thinking environment. Its industry-relevant degrees, work placements and support services are designed to give students skills that help make them globally employable.
  • A Poetics of Uncertainty: a Chorographic Survey of the Life of John Trevisa and the Site of Glasney College, Cornwall, Mediated Through Locative Arts Practice

    A Poetics of Uncertainty: a Chorographic Survey of the Life of John Trevisa and the Site of Glasney College, Cornwall, Mediated Through Locative Arts Practice

    VAL DIGGLE: A POETICS OF UNCERTAINTY A poetics of uncertainty: a chorographic survey of the life of John Trevisa and the site of Glasney College, Cornwall, mediated through locative arts practice By Valerie Ann Diggle Page 1 VAL DIGGLE: A POETICS OF UNCERTAINTY VAL DIGGLE: A POETICS OF UNCERTAINTY A poetics of uncertainty: a chorographic survey of the life of John Trevisa and the site of Glasney College, Cornwall, mediated through locative arts practice By Valerie Ann Diggle Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) University of the Arts London Falmouth University October 2017 Page 2 Page 3 VAL DIGGLE: A POETICS OF UNCERTAINTY VAL DIGGLE: A POETICS OF UNCERTAINTY A poetics of uncertainty: a chorographic survey of the life of John Trevisa and the site of Glasney College, Penryn, Cornwall, mediated through locative arts practice Connections between the medieval Cornishman and translator John Trevisa (1342-1402) and Glasney College in Cornwall are explored in this thesis to create a deep map about the figure and the site, articulated in a series of micro-narratives or anecdotae. The research combines book-based strategies and performative encounters with people and places, to build a rich, chorographic survey described in images, sound files, objects and texts. A key research problem – how to express the forensic fingerprint of that which is invisible in the historic record – is described as a poetics of uncertainty, a speculative response to information that teeters on the brink of what can be reliably known. This poetics combines multi-modal writing to communicate events in the life of the research, auto-ethnographically, from the point of view of an artist working in the academy.

  • In This Issue

    In this issue: • Is university right for me? •The different types of universities • The Russel Group universities Is university the right choice for me? The University of South Wales, our partner university has put together a series of videos to help you answer this question. https://southwales.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=d7f60e55-e50a-456d-a1ff -ac3d00e7ed13 What are the different types of universities? Ancient Universities These include Oxford (founded 1096) and Cambridge (founded 1209) are known as the Ox- bridge group and are the highest ranking universities in the UK St David’s College (1822-28) and Durham University (1832) follow the Oxford structure of col- leges and are considered the highest ranking universities after Oxford and Cambridge. Red Brick Red Brick Universities were formed mainly in the 19th century as a product of the industrial revolution and specialise in highly specialised skills in such are- as as engineering and medicine. University of Birmingham University of Bristol University of Leeds University of Liverpool University of Manchester The New Universities The New universities were created in the 1950s and 60s Some of these were former polytechnics or colleges which were granted university charter from 1990. These univer- sities focussed on STEM subjects such as engineering. Anglia Ruskin University, formerly Anglia Polytechnic (located in Cambridge and Chelmsford) Birmingham City University, formerly Birmingham Polytechnic University of Brighton, formerly Brighton Polytechnic Bournemouth University,
  • Student Comparison Data

    Student Comparison Data

    EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP SEVENTH REPORT – STUDENT DATA 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 2. Undergraduate entrants - Intakes........................................................................ 7 2.1 Gender .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Disability............................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Ethnicity............................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Age on entry...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Previous Institution type .................................................................................... 9 3. Postgraduate Taught – Intakes.......................................................................... 10 3.1 Gender ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Disability.......................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Ethnicity........................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Age on entry.................................................................................................... 11 4. Postgraduate Research entrants -
  • Review of the Year 2013-2014 2 3 Welcome Contents

    Review of the Year 2013-2014 2 3 Welcome Contents

    Review of the year 2013-2014 2 3 Welcome Contents It is always difficult to capture in such am pleased to introduce the 05 Our research University’s annual review for the a publication the essence, energy and I academic year 2013-2014. This has been another highly successful year for sheer excellence that underpins a Bristol across the whole spectrum of 19 A global institution university like Bristol – its leading-edge our activities. research, its highly talented and driven One such measure of these 22 Working in partnership achievements is shown in our students and staff. This is no easy task continued upward trajectory in the and I hope that we have managed to global university rankings, placing 24 Education and the student experience Bristol among the world’s most convey perhaps a snapshot of what, prestigious institutions. As a truly global university, we have a positive in my view, makes Bristol such an impact on many people’s lives all over 28 Our students exceptional university. the world and this is a position of privilege which we most certainly do not take for granted. 30 Honorary degrees On a personal note, this is the last Review of the Year that I will introduce, 31 Investing in our estate as I step down as Vice-Chancellor in August 2015. I look back at the University’s many achievements over my years as Vice-Chancellor with 32 Bristol alumni immense pride. Bristol is recognised globally for the quality of its research and teaching and this is testament to 33 Philanthropy the significant talent and dedication of my colleagues across the institution.
  • Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 08 March 2019 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Lancaster, Thomas M. and Dimitriadis, Stavros L. and Tansey, Katherine E. and Perry, Gavin and Ihssen, Niklas and Jones, Derek K. and Singh, Krish D. and Holmans, Peter and Pocklington, Andrew and Davey Smith, George and Zammit, Stan and Hall, Jeremy and O'Donovan, Michael C. and Owen, Michael J. and Linden, David E. (2019) 'Structural and functional neuroimaging of polygenic risk for schizophrenia : a recall-by-genotypebased approach.', Schizophrenia bulletin., 45 (2). pp. 405-414. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby037 Publisher's copyright statement: c The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.