DOCSLIB.ORG

Recreation Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recreation Master Plan THE VILLAGE OF WOLVERINE LAKE RECREATION MASTER PLAN 2016 - 2020 Tiki Night on Wolverine Lake Adopted February 10, 2016 THE VILLAGE OF WOLVERINE LAKE RECREATION MASTER PLAN 2016 – 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V ILLAGE C OUNCIL John Magee, President Ed Sienkiewicz, President Pro-Tem Mark Duff Patrick Nagy Brian Nedrow John Scott Mike Stack P ARK AND R ECREATION B OARD Lynn Lewis, Chairperson Diane Braykovich Mark Duff, Council Liaison Scott Fredericks, Planning Liaison Jack Hansel Sig Jamison Amber Pisha V ILLAGE S TAFF Sharon Miller, Administrator & Clerk Michael Kondek, Treasurer John Ellsworth, Police Captain Tim Brandt, Building Inspector S PECIAL T HANKS Tom Hite - Photos V ILLAGE OF W OLVERINE L AKE R ECREATION M ASTER P LAN i T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Community Description ....................................................................................................................................4 Administrative Structure ....................................................................................................................................20 Recreation Inventory ...........................................................................................................................................22 Public Participation .............................................................................................................................................49 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................52 Action Program .....................................................................................................................................................53 Tables and Figures Table 1: Input Participation ...................................................................................................................3 Table 2: Population Change 2000 - 2014 .............................................................................................6 Table 3: Wolverine Lake and Surrounding Communities Population Growth 2000 - 2010 .......6 Table 4: Household Change ...................................................................................................................7 Table 5: Median Age Comparison .........................................................................................................7 Table 6: Population Change by Gender and Age ...............................................................................8 Table 7: Projected Population Change by Age Group ......................................................................9 Table 8: Household Types ......................................................................................................................9 Table 9: 2013 Population with Disabilities ..........................................................................................9 Table 10: Median Family Income ..........................................................................................................10 Table 11: Land Use Change 2007 - 2013 .............................................................................................16 Table 12: 2015-2016 Budget Summary .................................................................................................20 Table 13: Regional Recreation Facilities ...............................................................................................37 Table 14: Parkland Acreage Standards .................................................................................................47 Table 15: National Sports Participation, 2012 .....................................................................................49 Table 16: Improvement Schedule .........................................................................................................55 Figure 1: Wolverine Lakes Park and Open Spaces .............................................................................22 Figure 2: Clara Miller Park ......................................................................................................................23 Figure 3: Wolverine Lake Access Site ...................................................................................................24 Figure 4: Lakes Community Trail ..........................................................................................................25 Figure 5: Vita Trail ...................................................................................................................................26 Figure 6: United Neighborhood Walkways Plan (2006) ....................................................................28 Figure 7: Area Park Facilities .................................................................................................................32 V ILLAGE OF W OLVERINE L AKE R ECREATION M ASTER P LAN ii Figure 8: Regional Recreational Facilities around Wolverine Lake ..................................................36 Maps Location Map ............................................................................................................................................4 Natural Features Map ..............................................................................................................................15 Existing Land Use Map ..........................................................................................................................17 Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Map ........................................................................................18 Appendices – Supporting Documents Survey .........................................................................................................................................................58 Survey Results ...........................................................................................................................................60 Notice of Draft Plan Availability ...........................................................................................................72 Park and Recreation Board Resolution ................................................................................................73 Notice of Public Hearing and Minutes of Public Hearing ................................................................74 Village Council Resolution of Adoption ..............................................................................................75 Letters of Transmittal to Regional Agencies & DNR ........................................................................76 V ILLAGE OF W OLVERINE L AKE R ECREATION M ASTER P LAN iii INTRODUCTION Clara Miller Park I NTRODUCTION Recreation is, to a large degree, why there is a Village of Wolverine Lake. One of the key reasons for the Village’s creation in 1954 was to protect and improve the lake as a recreational asset for those who lived in the community. Today, Wolverine Lake, the Village’s namesake, remains the community’s foremost recreation resource. The 270-acre lake represents almost 27% of the Village’s total land area. Since 1954, the Village has expanded and built upon its recreational foundation in the creation of other park facilities and programs. Formal recreation plans in the Village can be traced back to 1974 when Herbert Norgrove mapped out potential recreational facilities throughout the Village. Formal recreation master plans were written in 1993, 2001, and 2009, and this Plan builds upon those planning efforts to expand and improve recreation opportunities for the Village’s residents. The 2016 Village of Wolverine Lake Recreation Master Plan articulates a vision for parks and recreation in the Village. The purpose of this Plan is to guide recreation planning and development efforts of Wolverine Lake over the next five-year period, to December 2020. Once adopted, the Plan is the official document to be used by the community to guide decisions regarding parks and recreation. This Plan is also intended to meet the State’s standards for community recreation planning that are necessary to gain eligibility for grant programs. WHAT THE PLAN CONTAINS The Village of Wolverine Lake Recreation Master Plan follows the format suggested by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) in the Guidelines for the Development of Community Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Plans (IC 1924, revised 3-19-2015). It begins with a brief overview of the Plan as well as a description of the planning process which was used to develop the Plan. The Plan then presents a community description, providing information on both the social and physical characteristics of the community. A description of the community’s administrative structure follows, including information on funding and budgets. A detailed recreation inventory describes the existing parkland and recreational facilities of the community as well as those of the region and state. The public participation portion of the Plan presents the input received from local officials, staff, and residents of Wolverine Lake, which helped the Park and Recreation Board formulate the Plan’s goals and objectives. The action program then provides steps and strategies for implementing the Plan. Finally, the appendix includes supporting materials, such as a copy of the public input survey, and resolutions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 18, 2000
    lomeTbwn COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Ulestlani) (Dbserwr Your hometown newspaper serving Westland for 36 years aW ^aw Sunday, June 18, 2000 hometownnewspapers.net 75C Volume 36 Number 5 Wastlang, MteNoan OeOOo HomeTown Communicator* Natwof«4t Glad you're my dad Victim feared for life • In emotional testimony Thursday, a woman described a brutal assault in Westland. Charges include attempted murder. BY DAHHELL CLEM 8TAWWWITO dcIea>Ao«JtoiB««oiUBUiet Raped, beaten and crawling on soggy ground in a dark, wooded area of West- land, a 48-year-old woman feared she was going to be killed when her attack­ er got into his pickup truck and started aurr Pacma n ft* MA*UY the engine. THE WEEK "To myself I said, 'He's going to run Thanksl Above, Valerie over me with his truck/ "the victim Poma, 2% of Westland testified Thursday. "I thought he was holds the picture frame she going to kill me because of the blows f^Wmmmg^Lwdf made for her dad, David, and the strikes and the way he was' for Father's Day at the beating me. I thought, This is it.'" Westland library this past Instead, she said, her attacker drove off after he forced her to perform oral MONDAY week. With Valerie in the sex, raped her inside his truck, and photo when she was a baby beat and kicked her so brutally that, is older sister Melissa. At she still winced in pain Thursday from City Hall: The Westland right, Darcy Vines, 5, of broken vertebrae and ribs she suffered City Council will meet 7 Westland works on the pic­ May 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • 1.0 Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action
    1.0 Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action 1.1 Description of the Proposed Action The City of Ann Arbor, Michigan in partnership with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) have proposed to construct an intermodal station within the City of Ann Arbor. This project would support the existing Amtrak intercity service between Detroit, Michigan and Chicago, Illinois, the planned Midwest High Speed Rail service between Detroit/Pontiac and Chicago and the future proposed regional commuter rail service (see Section 1.6, Relationship to other Transportation Planning Initiatives). This Environmental Assessment will include an evaluation of the existing station location along with other alternatives in Ann Arbor, and will assess their ability to support current and future Intercity Passenger rail service, in addition to local and regional transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation. 1.2 Project Study Area Exhibit 1.1: Project Study Area Source: ESRI The project study area is located in the City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, along the rail line used by the Wolverine Intercity Passenger rail service, (see Exhibit 1.1) from where the City boundary on the northwest meets the rail line, southwest through the city to the city limits at the intersection of US Highway 23 and the rail line. The project study area for the proposed intermodal station is completely within the city limits of Ann Arbor as the City of Ann 1 Arbor will assume ownership of a new station. The existing station is located at 325 Depot Street, northwest of the central Ann Arbor downtown area, the University of Michigan (U-M) central campus and the U-M Medical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Comprehensive Trails Plan
    MICHIGAN COMPREHENSIVE TRAILS PLAN As required by PA 45 of 2010 2013-2018 _______________________________________________________ MICHIGAN SNOWMOBILE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COUNCIL MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MAY, 2013 Trail: A path, route, way, right of way, or corridor posted, signed or designated as open for travel by the general public. An opportunity to experience solitude or companionship, recreation or challenge; an opportunity for the appreciation of nature; a means of achieving renewal of body, mind and spirit. TABLE OF CONTENTS MICHIGAN SNOWMOBILE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COUNCIL ........................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 2 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTIONS ................................... 25 CHAPTER 3 - MOTORIZED TRAIL SYSTEM .............................................. 39 OFF-ROAD VEHICLE (ORV) TRAIL SYSTEM .................................... 39 SNOWMOBILE TRAIL SYSTEM ......................................................... 45 CHAPTER 4 - NON-MOTORIZED TRAIL SYSTEM ...................................... 56 LOOPED TRAILS ............................................................................ 56 EQUESTRIAN TRAILS ..................................................................... 75 LINEAR TRAILS .............................................................................. 93 CHAPTER 5 - WATER TRAILS .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1987 House Enrolled Bill 4235
    Act No. 108 Public Acts of 1987 Approved by the Governor July 10, 1987 Filed with the Secretary of State July 13, 1987 STATE OF MICHIGAN 84TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 1987 Introduced by Rep. O’Neill Reps. Rocca and Browne named co-sponsors ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4135 AN ACT to make appropriations to the department of natural resources; to provide for the acquisition of land; to provide for the development of public recreation facilities; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state agencies and officials; and to provide for the expenditure of appropriations. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 1. There is appropriated for the department of natural resources to supplement former appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1987, the sum of $15,300,000.00 for land acquisition and $5,100,000.00 for public recreation facility development grants as provided in section 35 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and the Michigan natural resources trust fund act, Act No. 101 of the Public Acts of 1985, being sections 318.501 to 318.516 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, from the following funds: GROSS APPROPRIATION.......................................................................................................... $ 20,400,000 Appropriated from: Special revenue funds: Michigan natural resources trust fund......................................................................................... $ 20,400,000 State general fund/general purpose............................................................................................. $ -0- DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. Michigan natural resources trust fund land acquisition (by priority) 1. Coldwater Lake farms, phase II, Branch county 2. Herman properties, phase II, Muskegon and Newaygo counties 3. Arends farm, phase II, Muskegon and Newaygo counties 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • DNR-Designated Equestrian Trails and Campgrounds
    DNR-designated Equestrian Trails and Campgrounds KEWEENAW Michigan.gov/Equestrian Houghton HOUGHTON Chassell Ontonagon Headquarters Lake Equestrian Trail and Rockland Baraga Grand State Forest Marais Campground ONTONAGON Sault BARAGA Ste. Marquette Paradise Thunderr Marie Ironwood Marenisco Ishpeming Valllley LUCE Equesttrriian Republic MARQUETTE Trraiill and Munising Newberry GOGEBIC Trraiill Camp CHIPPEWA IRON Pine Bowl ALGER SCHOOLCRAFT Pathway Iron DICKINSON River MACKINAC DELTA Naubinway Manistique Mackinaw Iron City Mountain MENOMINEE Escanaba Black Shore to Mountain Shore Pathway EMMET Cedar River Trail Black Lake Trail Camp Pathway Cedar River North Stoney Creek Cedar River North Equestrian Sttatte Forrestt Trail and PRESQUE ISLE Campgrround Trail Camp Rockport CHARLEVOIX CHEBOYGAN Elk Hill Group Equestrian & Recreation Shore River Trail Campground Area Trails to MONTMORENCY ALPENA Menominee ANTRIM Gaylord Shore Johnson's Crossing Trail Camp Alpena LEELANAU Rapid Goose Trail Big Oaks Equestrian Trail River Creek OTSEGO Garey Lake Trail and Trail Camp Trail Camp Lake Trail Dubonnet Camp Camp CRAWFORD Walsh Road Equestrian Empire Trail Campground and Trail Camp, DNR City Camp McKinley Horse BENZIE Scheck's Place Trail Campground GRAND Trail Camp Grayling ALCONA Betsie Valley TRAVERSE KALKASKA OSCODA DNR Equestrian Campground State Trail Shore 4 Mile Luzerne Shore Hopkins Creek Trail Trail Oscoda ttoo Equestrian Camp, Camp, South USFS Equestrian Campground SShhoorree State Forest DNR USFS Branch River Road MANISTEE TTrraaiill Campground
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Go-Get Outdoors
    Go-Get Outdoors 2011 Summer Event Calendar July 9 Brighton Recreation Area June Activities July Activities Lawnlympics Bean Bag and Ladder Golf Tournament June 19 Ortonville State Recreation Area July 1-3 Proud Lake Recreation Area 3-D Triathlon Red White and Blue Weekend July 9 Wilderness State Park Bean Bag Toss Tournament June 19 Brighton Recreation Area July 2 Harrisville State Park XTERRA Torn Shirt Triathlon Fourth of July Celebration July 9 Bald Mountain Recreation Area July 2 Wilderness State Park South Unit Scavenger Scramble June 19 Pontiac Lake Recreation Area Independence Day Weekend Pontiac Miniature Aircraft Club July 9 Waterloo Recreation Area Bike Parade Portage Uni–One Helluva Ride June 20 Holland State Park July 2 Wilderness State Park (Fun Rides) Snorkeling 101 Horseshoe Tournament July 10 Interlochen State Park June 25 Harrisville State Park July 2 Pinckney Recreation Area 3 Discipline Triathlon Explorer Weekend Independence Day Parade July 10 Fort Wilkins Historic State Park Run June 25 Onaway State Park July 2 Van Riper State Park the Keweenaw Trails to Trails Fourth of July Festival July 10 Pinckney Recreation Area June 25 Bay City State Recreation Area July 2-4 J.W. Wells State Park Ann Arbor Triathlon Beach Wellness Event Independence Day Celebration July 15 Sterling State Park & Chili Cook-off June 25 Bay City State Recreation Area 1st Annual Trek Women’s Series Pet Parade July 3 Algonac State Park July 15-17 Bay City State Recreation Area Annual Classic Car Show June 25 Pinckney Recreation Area Christmas In July Ladder Golf Contest July 3 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Amtrak and Motorcoach Service
    Supporting Passenger Mobility and Choice by Breaking Modal Stovepipes Comparing Amtrak and Motorcoach Service July 2013 M.J. Bradley & Associates LLC (603) 647 5746 / www.mjbradley.com Authors: Dana Lowell and David Seamonds M.J. Bradley & Associates LLC 1000 Elm Street, 2nd Floor Manchester, NH 03101 (603) 647-5746 x103 [email protected] This document was prepared by M.J. Bradley & Associates for submission to: 111 K Street, NE 9th Floor Washington, DC 20002-8110 The Reason Foundation 5737 Mesmer Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90230 651 Pennsylvania Ave, SE Washington, DC 20003 Comparison of Amtrak Trips to Motorcoach Trips Table of Contents Key Findings .................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 1 Study Methodology .............................................................................................. 11 1.1 Current Amtrak Service ..................................................................................... 11 1.2 Current Motorcoach Service .............................................................................. 12 1.3 Incremental Trip Time ....................................................................................... 14 1.4 Value of Incremental Trip Time......................................................................... 16 1.5 Emissions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]