Blount, Anteversion and Torsion: What’s it all about?
Arthur B. Meyers, MD Assistant Professor of Radiology Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin/ Medical College of Wisconsin Disclosures ¥ Author for Amirsys/Elsevier, receiving royalGes Lower Extremity Alignment in Children ¥ Lower extremity rotaGon Ð Femoral version / Gbial torsion Ð Normal values & clinical indicaGons Ð Imaging ¥ Blount disease Ð Physiologic bowing Ð Blount disease Lower Extremity RotaGonal Alignment Primarily determined by:
1. Femoral version
2. Tibial torsion
3. PosiGon of the foot Rosenfeld SB. Approach to the child with in-toeing. Up-to-date. 2/2014 Lower Extremity RotaGonal Alignment Primarily determined by:
1. Femoral version
2. Tibial torsion
3. PosiGon of the foot Rosenfeld SB. Approach to the child with in-toeing. Up-to-date. 2/2014 Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neck in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior condylar axis of the distal femur)
Femoral Version Femoral Version Femoral Version Femoral Version Femoral Version Femoral Anteversion Femoral Retroversion Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion RotaGon of the distal Gbia in relaGon to the proximal Gbia
Tibial Torsion Tibial Torsion Tibial Torsion Tibial Torsion Tibial Torsion
External Tibial Torsion Internal Tibial Torsion Normal Values ¥ Femoral version (averages) Ð Birth –30 - 40° of anteversion Ð 16 years – 16 ° of anteversion Ð Adults – 8 – 14 ° of anteversion
¥ Tibial torsion (averages) Ð Birth – neutral to mild external Gbial torsion Ð 4yrs – 28° external Gbial torsion (range 20 - 37°) Ð Adult - 38° (18 - 47°) external Gbial torsion Clinical IndicaGons for Assessing Lower Extremity RotaGon ¥ In-toeing / Out-toeing ¥ Associated condiGons Ð Cerebral palsy Ð Hemiplegia ¥ Post-traumaGc rotaGonal deformiGes Ð Normal variability between limbs in an individual Ð Femoral anteversion ¥ Lea and right differences as high as 15° in normal controls Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes:
Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis
Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis 2. Distal femoral axis
Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis 2. Distal femoral axis 3. Proximal Gbial axis
Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis 2. Distal femoral axis 3. Proximal Gbial axis 4. Distal Gbial axis
Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon
RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis 2. Distal femoral axis 3. Proximal Gbial axis 4. Distal Gbial axis
CT – most commonly used imaging method Imaging Lower Extremity RotaGon
RotaGonal alignment of the lower extremity determined by defining four axes: 1. Femoral neck axis 2. Distal femoral axis 3. Proximal Gbial axis 4. Distal Gbial axis
CT – most commonly used imaging method NO consensus on how to define these axes on CT or how to measure femoral version/ Gbial torsion 16-year-old girl with in-toeing
Scout image from hips -> ankles
Scout image from hips -> ankles
3 Sets of 5 mm thick slices:
Scout image from hips -> ankles
3 Sets of 5 mm thick slices: 1. Femoral heads -> lesser trochanters
Scout image from hips -> ankles
3 Sets of 5 mm thick slices: 1. Femoral heads -> lesser trochanters 2. Femoral condyles -> proximal Gbial epiphyses
Scout image from hips -> ankles
3 Sets of 5 mm thick slices: 1. Femoral heads -> lesser trochanters 2. Femoral condyles -> proximal Gbial epiphyses 3. Distal Gbial epiphyses
1. Place cursor at center of femoral head 1. Place cursor at center of femoral head 2. Without moving cursor scroll inferior to the level of the lesser trochanter 1. Place cursor at center of femoral head 2. Without moving cursor scroll inferior to the level of the lesser trochanter 3. Mark 2 points on this image: i. Center femoral head (obtained from upper image) ii. Center of femoral shaa on this image
1. Place cursor at center of femoral head 2. Without moving cursor scroll inferior to the level of the lesser trochanter 3. Mark 2 points on this image: i. Center femoral head (obtained from upper image) ii. Center of femoral shaa on this image
4. Line formed = femoral neck axis 1. Place cursor at center of femoral head 2. Without moving cursor scroll inferior to the level of the lesser trochanter 3. Mark 2 points on this image: i. Center femoral head (obtained from upper image) ii. Center of femoral shaa on this image NH
4. Line formed = femoral neck axis 5. Obtain femoral neck-horizontal (NH) angle NH NH NH
6. Posterior femoral condylar line NH
6. Obtain femoral condylar-horizontal (CH) angle CH 33°
36°
Femoral neck-horizontal (NH) angle is externally rotated 33°
Femoral condylar-horizontal (CH) angle is internally rotated + 36°
33° 69°
36°
Femoral neck-horizontal (NH) angle is externally rotated 33°
Femoral condylar-horizontal (CH) angle is internally rotated + 36°
Femoral neck-Femoral condylar angle (NC) [NC = NH + CH] 69° Anteversion
33° 69°
36°
Femoral neck-horizontal (NH) angle is externally rotated 33°
Femoral condylar-horizontal (CH) angle is internally rotated + 36°
Femoral neck-Femoral condylar angle (NC) [NC = NH + CH] 69° Anteversion
Average degree of femoral anteversion at 16 years = 16°
1. Proximal posterior Gbial condyles
1. Proximal Gbial-horizontal angle (PH) PH
1. Proximal Gbial-horizontal angle (PH) PH
2. Distal bimalleolar line
1. Proximal Gbial-horizontal angle (PH) PH
2. Distal Gbial-horizontal angle (DH) DH
22°
12°
Distal Gbial-horizontal angle (DH) is externally rotated 22°
Proximal Gbia-horizontal angle (PH) is internally rotated + 12°
22° 34° 12°
Distal Gbial-horizontal angle (DH) is externally rotated 22°
Proximal Gbia-horizontal angle (PH) is internally rotated + 12°
Distal Gbial-proximal Gbial angle (DH + PH) 34° External Torsion
Bilateral de-rotaGonal osteotomies of bilateral femurs and Gbias/fibulas
Improvement of gait disturbance and cosmeGc concerns NH-External
NH = Neck horizontal angle NH-External CH-Neutral
NH = Neck CH = Condylar horizontal angle horizontal angle NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion NH-External CH-Neutral NH = NC
NH = Neck CH = Condylar NC = Neck horizontal angle horizontal angle condylar angle NH-External NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH = Neck CH = Condylar NC = Neck horizontal angle horizontal angle condylar angle NH-External CH-External NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH = Neck CH = Condylar NC = Neck horizontal angle horizontal angle condylar angle NH-External CH-External NH – CH = NC Anteversion NH-External CH-External NH - CH = NC NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH = Neck CH = Condylar NC = Neck horizontal angle horizontal angle condylar angle NH-External CH-External NH – CH = NC Anteversion
NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH-External NH-External CH-External NH – CH = NC Anteversion
NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH-External CH-Internal NH-External CH-External NH – CH = NC Anteversion
NH-External CH-neutral NH = NC Anteversion
NH-External CH-Internal NH + CH = NC Anteversion NH-External CH-Internal NH + CH = NC More Accurate Measurements of Femoral Anteversion More Accurate Measurements of Femoral Anteversion Physiologic Bowing and Blount Disease Bowing / Genu varum ¥ Bowing of the lower extremiGes is a common referral to orthopedic clinics ¥ DifferenGal diagnosis includes: Ð Developmental ‘Physiologic’ bowing Ð Blount disease Ð Physeal disturbance (e.g., trauma, infecGon) Ð Metabolic bone disease Ð Skeletal dysplasias Bowing / Genu varum ¥ Bowing of the lower extremiGes is a common referral to orthopedic clinics ¥ DifferenGal diagnosis includes: Ð Developmental ‘Physiologic’ bowing Ð Blount disease Ð Physeal disturbance (e.g., trauma, infecGon) Ð Metabolic bone disease Ð Skeletal dysplasias Tibiofemoral angle Angle between lines parallel to midshaas of the femurs & Gbias on a standing AP radiograph Tibiofemoral angle
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Tibiofemoral angle
¥ 0-1 yr - 10-17° varus
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Tibiofemoral angle
¥ 0-1 yr - 10-17° varus ¥ 1-2 yrs 0-10° varus
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Tibiofemoral angle
¥ 0-1 yr - 10-17° varus ¥ 1-2 yrs 0-10° varus ¥ 2-3 yrs 0-10° valgus
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Tibiofemoral angle
¥ 0-1 yr - 10-17° varus ¥ 1-2 yrs 0-10° varus ¥ 2-3 yrs 0-10° valgus ¥ 3-4 yrs 8-12° valgus
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Tibiofemoral angle
¥ 0-1 yr - 10-17° varus ¥ 1-2 yrs 0-10° varus ¥ 2-3 yrs 0-10° valgus ¥ 3-4 yrs 8-12° valgus ¥ 4-13 yrs ~6° valgus
Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar; 57(2):259-61.
Physiologic bowing 1-year-old 3-year-old 13-year-old Physiologic bowing 1-year-old 3-year-old 13-year-old
Varus Physiologic bowing 1-year-old 3-year-old 13-year-old
Varus Valgus Physiologic bowing 1-year-old 3-year-old 13-year-old
Varus Valgus Mild Valgus Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs
23-month-old Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon
23-month-old Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon
20° varus
23-month-old Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon
20° varus
1-2 years nl = 0-10° varus
23-month-old Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon Ð Medial Gbial metaphysis ¥ Mild enlargement / depression ¥ Mild beaking ¥ No fragmentaGon
23-month-old Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon Ð Medial Gbial metaphysis ¥ Mild enlargement / depression ¥ Mild beaking ¥ No fragmentaGon Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon Ð Medial Gbial metaphysis ¥ Mild enlargement / depression ¥ Mild beaking ¥ No fragmentaGon Ð Mild thickening of the medial Gbal cortex Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing ¥ Radiographs Ð Varus angulaGon Ð Medial Gbial metaphysis ¥ Mild enlargement / depression ¥ Mild beaking ¥ No fragmentaGon Ð Mild thickening of the medial Gbal cortex Ð Normal metaphyseal- diaphyseal angle Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Angle ¥ MDA – the angle between:
Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Angle ¥ MDA – the angle between: Ð Line drawn along the proximal Gbial metaphysis
Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Angle ¥ MDA – the angle between: Ð Line drawn along the proximal Gbial metaphysis Ð Line perpendicular to the long axis of the Gbia Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Angle ¥ MDA – the angle between: 10° Ð Line drawn along the proximal Gbial metaphysis Ð Line perpendicular to the long axis of the Gbia
Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Angle ¥ MDA – the angle between: 10° Ð Line drawn along the proximal Gbial metaphysis Ð Line perpendicular to the long axis of the Gbia ¥ MDA values Ð Physiologic bowing ¥ MDA typically < 11° Ð Blount disease ¥ MDA typically > 11° Ð Borderline 8-11° Exaggerated Physiologic Bowing
IniGal 7 months later Blount Disease Blount Disease ¥ Developmental disorder with disrupted endochondral ossificaGon of the medial proximal Gbial physis Ð Abnormal development of the proximal, medial Gbial epiphysis/metaphysis ¥ Angular deformites: Ð Genu varum (mostly from Gbia) Ð Procurvatum Ð Internal rotaGon of the Gbia ¥ Limb shortening Ð LLD if asymmetric or unilateral Blount Disease ¥ Risk factors: Ð Early ambulaGon Ð Obesity Ð African or Scandinavian descent ¥ EGology: unknown (likely mulGfactorial) Ð Risk factors of early ambulaGon & obesity suggest biomechanical component ¥ Two forms: Ð InfanGle or early onset (< 4 years) Ð Late onset >4 yrs ¥ Juvenile > 4 yrs ¥ Adolescent >10 yrs Langenskiöld ClassificaGon of Early Onset Blount Disease
Sabharwal S. Blount Disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009 Jul 01; 91 (7): 1758 -1776 . Radiographic findings Radiographic findings Standing AP radiograph Radiographic findings Standing AP radiograph ¥ Genu Varum
15-month-old Radiographic findings Standing AP radiograph ¥ Genu Varum
Tibiofemoral angles ~20°
1-2 years nl = 0-10° varus
15-month-old Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal 12° angle (MDA) Ð Physiologic bowing ¥ MDA typically < 11° Ð Blount disease ¥ MDA typically > 11° Ð Borderline 8-11°
Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal 12° angle (MDA) Ð Physiologic bowing ¥ MDA typically < 11° Ð Blount disease ¥ MDA typically > 11° Ð Borderline 8-11°
Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) Ð Physiologic bowing ¥ MDA typically < 11° Ð Blount disease ¥ MDA typically > 11° Ð Borderline 8-11°
1 year later Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis
Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis ¥ Medial Gbial metaphysis Ð Depression Ð “Beaked” Ð Irregular / fragmented Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis ¥ Medial Gbial metaphysis Ð Depression Ð “Beaked” Ð Irregular / fragmented Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis ¥ Medial Gbial metaphysis Ð Depression Ð “Beaked” Ð Irregular / fragmented Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis ¥ Medial Gbial metaphysis Ð Depression Ð “Beaked” Ð Irregular / fragmented Radiographic findings ¥ Genu Varum (Standing AP radiograph) ¥ Increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) ¥ Widened medial Gbial physis ¥ Medial Gbial metaphysis Ð Depression Ð “Beaked” Ð Irregular / fragmented ¥ Abnormal/delayed ossificaGon of the medial Gbial epiphysis Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum ¥ Lateral radiograph
10 year old Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum ¥ Lateral radiograph Radiographic findings
¥ Angular deformity: Ð Genu varum Ð Lateral subluxaGon of the Gbia Ð Procurvatum ¥ Lateral radiograph
MRI Findings MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space ¥ Medial Meniscus Ð Thickened +/- abnormal signal MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space ¥ Medial Meniscus Ð Thickened +/- abnormal signal MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space ¥ Medial Meniscus Ð Thickened +/- abnormal signal MRI Findings Medial Proximal Tibia ¥ Physis Ð Widening/downsloping Ð Physeal bar ¥ Metaphysis – irregularity, downsloping, é T2 SI ¥ Tibial epiphyseal carGlage Ð Far medial – thick Ð Central Mid-coronal – thin ¥ Increased joint space ¥ Medial Meniscus Ð Thickened +/- abnormal signal ¥ Angular deformiGes Ð Medial and posterior downsloping MRI Findings Other findings: MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis - widened/irregular Ð Metaphysis MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis - widened/irregular Ð Metaphysis MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis ¥ Femur Ð Epiphysis Ð Metaphysis Ð Physis
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis ¥ Femur Ð Epiphysis Ð Metaphysis Ð Physis
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis ¥ Femur Ð Epiphysis Ð Metaphysis Ð Physis
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis ¥ Femur Ð Epiphysis Ð Metaphysis Ð Physis
Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
MRI Findings Other findings: ¥ Lateral proximal Gbia Ð Physis Ð Metaphysis ¥ Femur Ð Epiphysis Ð Metaphysis Ð Physis ¥ Soa Gssues Ð Perichondral menbrane ¥ Thickened Ð ACL - laxity Ho-Fung V, et al. Pediatr Radiol (2013)
Treatment of Blount Disease Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy ¥ ConvenGonal ¥ Ex-fix with gradual correcGon ¥ Medial Gbial plateau elevaGon
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy ¥ ConvenGonal ¥ Ex-fix with gradual correcGon ¥ Medial Gbial plateau elevaGon
Treatment ¥ ConservaGve Ð ObservaGon Ð Orthosis ¥ Surgery Ð Lateral hemiepiphyseodesis Ð ResecGon of a physeal bar Ð Realignment osteotomy ¥ ConvenGonal ¥ Ex-fix with gradual correcGon Sabharwal S. Blount disease. J Bone ¥ Medial Gbial plateau elevaGon Joint Surg Am. 2009
Summary Summary ¥ Femoral version Summary ¥ Femoral version ¥ Tibial Torsion Summary ¥ Femoral version ¥ Tibial Torsion
¥ Physiologic bowing Summary ¥ Femoral version ¥ Tibial Torsion
¥ Physiologic bowing ¥ Blount disease References ¥ KrisGansen LP, et al. The normal development of Gbial torsion. Skeletal Radiol. 2001 Sep;30(9):519-22. ¥ Liodakis, et al. Reliability of the assessment of lower limb torsion using computed tomography: analysis of five different techniques. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Mar;41(3): 305-11. ¥ Jarrex DY, et al. Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 May;194(5):1230-3. ¥ Riccio AI. Three-dimensional computed tomography for determinaGon of femoral anteversion in a cerebral palsy model. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Mar;35(2):167-71. ¥ Salenius P, et al. Development of the Gbiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Mar;57(2):259-61. ¥ Sabharwal S. Blount disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1758-76. ¥ Ho-Fung V, et al. MRI evaluaGon of the knee in children with infanGle Blount disease: Gbial and extra-Gbial findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Oct;43(10):1316-26.