DOCSLIB.ORG

History and Physical Examination of Hip Injuries in Elderly Adults

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History and Physical Examination of Hip Injuries in Elderly Adults 2.0 ANCC Contact History and Physical Examination of Hip Hours Injuries in Elderly Adults Mohammed Abdullah Hamedan Al Maqbali Hip fracture is the most common injury occurring to elderly hours of one morning, she was found on the fl oor of her people and is associated with restrictions of the activities of room. She stated that she was trying to get out of bed to the patients themselves. The discovery of a hip fracture can use her commode. She fell onto her right hip and began be the beginning of a complex journey of care, from initial to complain of a pain in her knee. At the emergency de- diagnosis, through operational procedures to rehabilitation. partment, a physical examination provided the observa- The patient's history and physical examination form the ba- tion that her right leg was externally rotated with a bruising of her right hip. An x-ray confi rmed a right sis of the diagnosis and monitoring of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. She did not present any past hip problems and dictate the appropriate treatment strategy medical history. The next morning, Mrs. B had surgery to be implemented. The aim of this study is to discuss the for open reduction and internal fi xation of the fracture. different diagnoses of hip pain in a case study of an elderly woman who initially complained of pain in her right knee following a fall at home. It shows that musculoskeletal History Taking physical examination determined the management of the History taking is important in sorting out the differen- hip fracture that was found to be present. In addition, tial diagnosis in elderly patients. The notes concerning the aim of this article is to review diagnostic tests such as the patient’s medical history should include the chief radiographs and recommend appropriate management and complaint, past medical history, family and social his- treatment of hip fractures in elderly patients. tory, risk factors, usual activity, and any history of pre- sent or previous trauma (Price & Miller, 2010). In their study, Cauley et al. (2008) noted that falls in old women were strongly associated with hip fractures. Introduction Mrs. B had a history of a fall on her right hip. Marks In the elderly population, falls are commonplace and (2010) suggested that around 90% of hip fractures were these may be the cause of disability and physical harm, associated with falls in elderly people. Assessing the including fractures or soft tissue injuries. Hagino et al. mechanism of fall and the environment of the fall loca- (2004) suggested that falls from bed or standing height tion could help with an appropriate diagnosis. However, frequently resulted in a fractured hip. The growth of the Mrs. B complained of pain in her right knee. Kreder and elderly population globally will be refl ected in a signifi - Jerome (2010) suggested that, typically, hip pain radi- cant increase in the number of hip fractures presenting ates down to the anterior aspect of the knee. The exam- over the coming decades (Chevalley et al., 2007 ). iner should ask the patient to describe the primary loca- Approximately 1.5 million cases of hip fracture occur tion of the pain and from where it radiated. Mrs. B worldwide each year and this is projected to reach 2.5 located the pain as being in her right hip, which radi- million by 2025 (Johnell & Kanis, 2006). In the United ated to her knee. The examiner has to differentiate be- States, there were approximately 289,000 cases of hip tween the types of pain such as that present with mono- fracture in 2010 (Stevens & Rudd, 2013). There are arthritis, oligoarthritis, and polyarthritis ( Marks, 2010 ). three main types of hip fracture that can be classifi ed on If the pain was localized only in the hip joint, it would the basis of their location (see Figure 1 ). be monoarthritis, usually caused by infection, trauma, This article aims to explore the physical assessment bleeding diathesis, or infl ammation (Huntley, Gibson, & of hip pain specifically due to a fractured hip. Simpson, 2009). Consequently, it aims to identify the appropriate treat- ment that will diminish morbidity and mortality rates in elderly patients. Mohammed Abdullah Hamedan Al-Maqbali, RN, DNA, BSc (Hons), MSc, Senior Staff Nurse, Al-Buraimi Hospital, Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman. Case Study The author and planners have disclosed no potential confl icts of interest, Mrs. B, an 89-year-old woman, lived in a residential fi nancial or otherwise. home and walked with a frame (walker). In the early DOI: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000033 86 Orthopaedic Nursing • March/April 2014 • Volume 33 • Number 2 © 2014 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Copyright © 2014 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. OONJ586R3.inddNJ586R3.indd 8866 113/03/143/03/14 66:57:57 PPMM associated with arthropathy and in sickle cell disease it may be related to osteonecrosis of the hip ( Huntley et al., 2009 ). However, there is a need to identify comor- bid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and obesity (Juhakoski, Tenhonen, Anttonen, Kaupinen, & Arokoski, 2008). Mrs. B reported that she did not have any disease and was not taking any medi- cation, vitamins, or herbs. In addition, she did not have any history of previous falls or surgery and was not allergic to any medication or food. Huang et al. (2012) indicated that the use of medica- tion among the elderly population can place them in greater risk of hip fracture because of changes in body composition, total body water, and hepatic and renal function. Several types of drugs may be associated with falls in the elderly such as cardiovascular drugs such as digoxin and diuretics (de Groot et al., 2013), benzodiaz- epines (van Strien, Koek, van Marum, & Emmelot- Vonk, 2013), antidepressants (Coupland et al., 2013), antiepileptics ( Tsiropoulos et al., 2008), and antipsycho- tropics (Echt, Samelson, Hannan, Dufour, & Berry, 2013). Postoperatively these medications may be con- trolled or doses reduced to lower the risk of future hip fractures. The examiner should ask the patient about his or her F IGURE 1. The regions where hip fractures occur. family history because of the hereditary basis of some diseases such as Marfan’s syndrome, osteoarthritis, As component of the history of symptoms of hip rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis. All of these pain, information concerning the onset of symptoms, could be associated with musculoskeletal disorders severity, and duration are essential in reaching an ap- (Oliver & Silman, 2009). Mrs. B stated that she was un- propriate diagnosis. The source of the pain should be sure of her family history in this respect. identifi ed and an assessment of whether it becomes There are many social factors, associated with mus- worse with movement or improves with rest should be culoskeletal system, which should be considered while made. If the patient suffers pain while at rest, it may be obtaining the medical history. Sun et al. (2011) sug- related to infection, tumors, or infl ammation (Bickley & gested that a history of smoking was related to bone me- Szilaygi, 2010). Huntley et al. (2009) suggested that if tastases. Other factors such as alcohol abuse could be the pain was sharp, stabbing, and aggravated by move- correlated with a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures ment it might be associated with a fracture. The onset of ( Berg et al., 2008 ). Furthermore, nutrition is very im- pain may give the assessor a clue as to the diagnosis. A portant in elderly people because they need healthy gradual onset of pain can be related to an arthritic con- bones. Vondracek and Linnebur (2009) demonstrated dition, whereas a quick onset may be associated with that vitamin D defi ciency could enhance susceptibility fractures, ligamentous or meniscal tears (Siva, to fractures in older people. Velazquez, Mody, & Brasington, 2003). The examiner The history of the patient’s activity levels before the should identify from whether or not there is limited incident should include their ability to walk and use the function, swelling, weakness, stiffness, and palpable stairs and the toilet. This information is important for snapping or clicking noises within the hip (Flannery, an accurate assessment of the patient’s functional Green, Harmon, & Masterson, 2011). capacity. In this regard, Mrs. B lived in a residential If the patient describes the stiffness as diffi cult, pain- home and used to move around by using a walker. ful, or restricted movement, in the musculoskeletal eval- uation, a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and/or osteo- arthritis may be made (Woolf & Pfl eger, 2003). Usually, Physical Examination weakness is a description of the loss of strength or gen- Obtaining the patient’s medical history is important in eral fatigue. The presence of weakness may suggest a guiding the examiner when undertaking the physical ex- joint disorder or peripheral nerve lesion ( Huntley et al., amination. The patient is usually exposed during the 2009 ). Swelling is an important symptom that needs to examination. Therefore, the examiner should ensure be described in both the medical history and the physi- that the patient has an appropriate level of privacy and cal examination. Mrs. B complained of the inability to his or her dignity is maintained. Domb, Brooks, and stand and said she felt the sharp pain only after falling Byrd (2009) suggested that the physical examination from the bed. A swelling was observed in the vicinity of should be systematic and comprehensive to avoid the her right hip. possibility of missing clinical fi ndings. As Mrs. B com- A previous medical history of hip pain is important plained of hip pain, the examiner should have under- as a guide as it may exclude some other differential taken an examination of the hip by carrying out a head- diagnosis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blount, Anteversion and Torsion: What's It All About?
    Blount, Anteversion and Torsion: What’s it all about? Arthur B. Meyers, MD Assistant Professor of Radiology Children’s Hospital of WisConsin/ MediCal College of WisConsin Disclosures • Author for Amirsys/Elsevier, reCeiving royalGes Lower Extremity Alignment in Children • Lower extremity rotaGon – Femoral version / Gbial torsion – Normal values & CliniCal indiCaGons – Imaging • Blount disease – Physiologic bowing – Blount disease Lower Extremity RotaGonal Alignment Primarily determined by: 1. Femoral version 2. Tibial torsion 3. PosiGon of the foot Rosenfeld SB. Approach to the Child with in-toeing. Up-to-date. 2/2014 Lower Extremity RotaGonal Alignment Primarily determined by: 1. Femoral version 2. Tibial torsion 3. PosiGon of the foot Rosenfeld SB. Approach to the Child with in-toeing. Up-to-date. 2/2014 Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior Condylar axis of the distal femur) Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior Condylar axis of the distal femur) Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior Condylar axis of the distal femur) Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior Condylar axis of the distal femur) Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long axis of the femur (posterior Condylar axis of the distal femur) Femoral Version The rotaGon of the femoral neCk in relaGon to the long
    [Show full text]
  • Femur Pelvis HIP JOINT Femoral Head in Acetabulum Acetabular
    Anatomy of the Hip Joint Overview The hip joint is one of the largest weight-bearing HIP JOINT joints in the body. This ball-and-socket joint allows the leg to move and rotate while keeping the body Femoral head in stable and balanced. Let's take a closer look at the acetabulum main parts of the hip joint's anatomy. Pelvis Bones Two bones meet at the hip joint, the femur and the pelvis. The femur, commonly called the "thighbone," is the longest and heaviest bone of the body. At the top of the femur, positioned on the femoral neck, is the femoral head. This is the "ball" of the hip joint. The other part of the joint – the Femur "socket" – is found in the pelvis. The pelvis is a bone made of three sections: the ilium, the ischium and the pubis. The socket is located where these three sections fuse. The proper name of the socket is the "acetabulum." The head of the femur fits tightly into this cup-shaped cavity. Articular Cartilage The femoral head and the acetabulum are covered Acetabular with a layer of articular cartilage. This tough, smooth tissue protects the bones. It allows them to labrum glide smoothly against each other as the ball moves in the socket. Soft Tissues Several soft tissue structures work together to hold the femoral head securely in place. The acetabulum is surrounded by a ring of cartilage called the "acetabular labrum." This deepens the socket and helps keep the ball from slipping out of alignment. It also acts as a shock absorber.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciatica and Chronic Pain
    Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh 123 Sciatica and Chronic Pain Robert W. Baloh Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh, MD Department of Neurology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA ISBN 978-3-319-93903-2 ISBN 978-3-319-93904-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93904-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952076 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures—A Surgical Management Algorithm
    medicina Review Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures—A Surgical Management Algorithm James W. A. Fletcher 1,2,* , Christoph Sommer 3, Henrik Eckardt 4, Matthias Knobe 5 , Boyko Gueorguiev 1 and Karl Stoffel 4 1 AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK 3 Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, 7000 Chur, Switzerland; [email protected] 4 University Hospital Basel, 4052 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] (H.E.); [email protected] (K.S.) 5 Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background and Objectives: Femoral neck fractures are common and constitute one of the largest healthcare burdens of the modern age. Fractures within the joint capsule (intracapsular) provide a specific surgical challenge due to the difficulty in predicting rates of bony union and whether the blood supply to the femoral head has been disrupted in a way that would lead to avascular necrosis. Most femoral neck fractures are treated surgically, aiming to maintain mobility, whilst reducing pain and complications associated with prolonged bedrest. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative review of intracapsular hip fracture management, highlighting the latest advancements in fixation techniques, generating an evidence-based algorithm for their management. Results: Multiple different fracture configurations are encountered within the category of intracapsular Citation: Fletcher, J.W.A.; Sommer, hip fractures, with each pattern having different optimal surgical strategies. Additionally, these C.; Eckardt, H.; Knobe, M.; Gueorguiev, B.; Stoffel, K. injuries typically occur in patients where further procedures due to operative complications are Intracapsular Femoral Neck associated with a considerable increase in mortality, highlighting the need for choosing the correct Fractures—A Surgical Management index operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Union of Neglected Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Free Fibular Graft
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evaluation of Union of Neglected Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Free Fibular Graft Nasir Ali, Muhammad Shahid Riaz, Muhammad Ishaque Khan, Muhammad Rafiq Sabir ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the frequency of union of neglected femoral neck fractures treated with free fibular graft. Study design Descriptive case series. Place & Department of Orthopedics Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, from April 2009 to Duration of January 2010. study Methodology Patients of neglected femoral neck fracture (one month postinjury) were included in the study. They were operated and internal fixation was done with concellous screws and free fibular graft placed. They were followed till the evidence of radiological union. Results Out of 55 patients there were 40 males and 15 females. Ages ranged from 20 year to 50 year. The duration of injury was from 4 weeks to 6 months. Fifty patients achieved complete union while five patients developed non-union with complaint of pain. There was no wound infection and hardware failure. Conclusion Fracture reduction and internal fixation with use of free fibular graft and concellous screws for neglected femoral neck fractures is the treatment of choice. Key words Bony union, Fracture- femur, Fibular graft. INTRODUCTION: time of injury to seek medical help.7 With delay these Fractures of neck of femur are great challenge to factures usually result in non union. The rate of non orthopaedic surgeons. With increase in life union is between 10-30% for such neglected expectancy and addition of geriatric population to fractures.8,9 Delay in surgery leads to variable degree society, the frequency of fracture neck of femur is of neck absorption, proximal migration of distal increasing day by day.1 Fracture neck of femur in fragment and disuse osteoporosis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hip's Influence on Low Back Pain
    Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2009, 18, 24-32 © 2009 Human Kinetics, Inc. The Hip’s Influence on Low Back Pain: A Distal Link to a Proximal Problem Michael P. Reiman, P. Cody Weisbach, and Paul E. Glynn Low back pain (LBP) is a multifactorial dysfunction, with one of the potential con- tributing factors being the hip joint. Currently, research investigating the examination and conservative treatment of LBP has focused primarily on the lumbar spine. The objective of this clinical commentary is to discuss the potential link between hip impairments and LBP using current best evidence and the concept of regional inter- dependence as tools to guide decision making and offer ideas for future research. Keywords: strength, rehabilitation In day-to-day clinical practice it is often difficult to identify the source of symptoms in patients with low back pain (LBP).1 Abenhaim et al2 noted that a small percentage of individuals with LBP have an identifiable pathoanatomical source. Further clouding the picture are multiple studies indicating the potential inability of diagnostic imaging to identify the pain source, influence prognosis, or affect outcomes.3–6 Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of subgrouping patients into a classification system based on signs and symptoms indicating their likelihood to respond to specific treatments. This classification approach has pro- duced improved outcomes and high levels of reliability as compared with clinical- practice guidelines.7–9 For treating clinicians, these findings help guide decision making and improve results; however, not all patients will fit into a treatment- based subgroup. The treating therapist must then rely on an impairment-based approach, identifying potential local or remote contributors to the patient’s area of primary concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsilateral Femoral Neck & Femoral Shaft Fracture
    5/31/2018 Ipsilateral Femoral Neck And Shaft Fractures Exchange Nailing For Non- Union Donald Wiss MD Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Introduction • Uncommon Injury • Invariably High Energy Trauma • Typically In Young Male Patient • Associated Injuries Common • Requires Prompt Diagnosis & Rx Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Introduction • Incidence 3% - 5% • Difficult To Manage When Displaced • Timing Of Treatment Controversial • Complications High In Many Series 1 5/31/2018 Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Mechanism Of Injury • High Energy Trauma • Longitudinal Force • Flexed & Abducted Hip • Flexed Knee Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Resultant Femoral Neck Fracture • Basilar In Location • Vertical In Orientation • Displacement Variable • Hard To Visualize • Sub-Optimal X-Rays • Missed Diagnosis Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Literature My Case 1982 • Up To 1/3 Femoral Neck Fractures Are Missed • When The Femoral Neck Fracture Is Missed Treatment Options Later Become More Limited And Difficult With Outcomes Worse • Dedicated Hip X-Rays & CT Scans On Initial Trauma Work-Up Decrease Incidence Of Missed Fractures 2 5/31/2018 Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Knee Injuries • Knee Injuries In 25% - 50% • Patella Fractures • Femoral Condyles • PCL Injuries • Easily Missed • Pre-Op Exam Difficult • High Index Of Suspicion • Late Morbidity Ipsilateral Neck-Shaft Fractures Treatment Wide Consensus That Fractures Of The Hip Should Take Precedence Over The Femoral Shaft Fracture Ipsilateral
    [Show full text]
  • Proximal Femur Lag Screw Placement Based on Bone Mineral Density Determined by Quantitative Computed Tomography
    2720 EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 19: 2720-2724, 2020 Proximal femur lag screw placement based on bone mineral density determined by quantitative computed tomography GANG LIU1,2*, JUN GE1*, XIAOHAN ZHENG2, CENHAO WU1, QI YAN1, HUILIN YANG1 and JUN ZOU1 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006; 2Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, P.R. China Received June 7, 2019; Accepted October 22, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8480 Abstract. Following internal fixations for intertrochanteric Introduction fractures in elderly patients, lag screws or screw blades frequently cut the femoral head, leading to surgical failure. The As aging increases in society, the incidence of proximal bone mineral density (BMD) at various parts of the proximal femoral fractures in the elderly, particularly intertrochanteric femur is significantly correlated with the holding force of the fractures, has seen an increase over the years. Complications lag screw, which in turn is closely associated with the stability arising from these fractures, including cardiovascular and of the fixation. However, the appropriate placement of the lag cerebrovascular diseases and lung infections, threaten the screw has been controversial. As a novel detection method for health of these patients (1). To reduce such complications, BMD, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) may provide the AO Foundation recommends intramedullary fixation, relatively accurate measurements of three‑dimensional struc- including proximal femoral nail anti‑rotation (PFNA), tures and may provide an easy way to determine the appropriate InterTan, and other internal fixation methods, for the treat- lag screw placement.
    [Show full text]
  • Knee Pain and Leg-Length Discrepancy After Retrograde Femoral Nailing Ricardo Reina, MD, Fernando E
    (aspects of trauma • an original study) Knee Pain and Leg-Length Discrepancy After Retrograde Femoral Nailing Ricardo Reina, MD, Fernando E. Vilella, MD, Norman Ramírez, MD, Richard Valenzuela, MD, Gil Nieves, MD, and Christian A. Foy, MD ABSTRACT an antegrade entry point at the pirifor- MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied postop- mis fossa.1,2,4,8-12 This technique has Between October 1998 and April 2000, erative knee function and leg-length several drawbacks, including a dif- a surgeon at University of Puerto Rico discrepancy (LLD) in 31 patients ficult starting point at the piriformis District Hospital and Puerto Rico with femoral diaphyseal fractures fossa, postoperative Trendelenburg Medical Center used retrograde IMN treated with retrograde intramedul- gait, iatrogenic fracture of the femo- to treat 46 femoral shaft fractures con- lary nailing (IMN) between October 1998 and April 2000. Mean follow-up ral neck, need for a fracture table secutively. For the purpose of this study, was 25 months, mean knee range of with difficult patient positioning, and we selected only those fractures motion was 126°, mean Hospital for limitations in use with concomitant located both 5 cm below the lesser Special Surgery knee scores were surgical procedures.3,5,6 trochanter14 and above the femoral 89.2 (pain) and 78.3 (function), and Over the past 20 years, retrograde condyles. Patients were contacted by mean LLD was 1.19 cm. Despite the IMN has emerged as an alternative telephone, by mail, or through local theoretically higher knee pain and that overcomes the shortcomings of government agencies. LLD rates associated with retrograde antegrade IMN in treating femoral Of the 46 patients, 15 (33%) were IMN, we believe it may offer a viable shaft fractures.1,3-5,7,8,13,14 The advan- excluded (4 had passed away, and 11 treatment option when the antegrade nailing technique is restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Consultation for the Elderly Patient with Hip Fracture
    J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/15572625-11-5-366 on 1 September 1998. Downloaded from CLINICAL REVIEW Medical Consultation for the Elderly Patient With Hip Fracture RichardJ Ackermann, MD Background: This article describes a family physician geriatrician's perspective on the comprehensive management of hip fracture in frail elderly patients. Primary care physicians might be called upon to pro­ vide medical consultation for these patients. Methods: Guidelines were developed by a combination of personal experience in consulting for several hun­ dred elderly patients with hip fracture at a large community hospital, literature review using the key words "hip fractures," "aged," and "aged, 80 and over," and educational presentations for family practice residents. Results and Conclusions: Elderly patients with hip fracture offer a prime opportunity for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Intertrochanteric fractures are almost always treated with internal fixation, whereas femoral neck fractures can be treated by either fixation or by hemiarthroplasty. Hip fracture should be re­ garded as a surgical urgency, and generally operation should not be delayed, even if patients have serious comorbidity. The family physician can be instrumental in preparing the patient for surgery, preventing and treating complications, and assisting in the placement and rehabilitation of patients after hospital dis­ charge. 0 Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11:366-77.) As the result of an aging population, family physi­ Some hip fractures and the falls that precede cians are increasingly likely to participate in the them are probably preventable. Strategies to de­ care of elderly patients suffering hip fracture. This tect and treat osteoporosis, especially in high-risk copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Portals and Blocking Screws for Femoral and Tibial Nailing
    Portals and Blocking Screws for Femoral and Tibial Nailing Daniel Horwitz Chief Orthopaedic Trauma Geisinger Health System Disclosures • Consultant – Biomet, Cardinal Health • Design – Biomet • Research Fellow Support - Synthes RULES TO LIVE BY… • DO WHAT YOU DO WELL • BE CAREFULL - DO NOT WASTE VALUABLE REAL ESTATE • DOUBLE CHECK AND TRIPLE CHECK ALLLIGNMENT/STARTING POINT • Varus/Valgus #1 • Flex/Ext #2 • Rotation /Length #3 Antegrade Femur Free Drape…ie. No traction • You need lots/more of help • OK for simple diaphyseal fractures • It is easy to drape yourself out in the buttock • If you like, consider going lateral with a beanbag and no traction – allows full access. • If you are struggling make a small incision PARALYSIS • Just Do It • In the young and muscular you will struggle without it. • Segmental/axially unstable fx > 24 hrs old you likely will NOT restore length without it PIRIFORMIS VS. TROCH ENTRY Which starting point is easier? Trochanteric Entry Which nail offers the most fixation options? Trochanteric Entry Which nail is more technically difficult to insert? Trochanteric Entry 4TH GENERATION NAILS • Troch entry recon • Not for IT Fx - collapse will not be reliable • Size and technique do matter…. – University of Utah biomechanical study • >11 nails are bad • Vertical jig orientation significantly decreases stress Pre-op Intra-op Post-op KEEP JIG VERTICALLY ORIENTED FOR FIRST 20 cm DO NOT GO BIGGER THAN 11mm Nail ALWAYS OVER REAM BY 2mm Which is more likely to displace an associated femoral neck fx? PIRIFORMIS Which entry site is more likely to cause hip pain and abductor weakness? PIRIFORMIS GAPPAGE • BACKSLAP vs.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Hip Pain-Suspected Fracture
    Revised 2018 American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Hip Pain-Suspected Fracture Variant 1: Acute hip pain. Fall or minor trauma. Suspect fracture. Initial imaging. Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level Radiography hip Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ Radiography pelvis Usually Appropriate ☢☢ Radiography pelvis and hips Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT pelvis and hips with IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT pelvis and hips without and with IV Usually Not Appropriate contrast ☢☢☢☢ CT pelvis and hips without IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ MRI pelvis and affected hip without and Usually Not Appropriate with IV contrast O MRI pelvis and affected hip without IV Usually Not Appropriate contrast O Bone scan hips Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ US hip Usually Not Appropriate O Variant 2: Acute hip pain. Fall or minor trauma. Negative radiographs. Suspect fracture. Next imaging study. Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level MRI pelvis and affected hip without IV Usually Appropriate contrast O CT pelvis and hips without IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT pelvis and hips with IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT pelvis and hips without and with IV Usually Not Appropriate contrast ☢☢☢☢ MRI pelvis and affected hip without and with Usually Not Appropriate IV contrast O Bone scan hips Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ US hip Usually Not Appropriate O ACR Appropriateness Criteria® 1 Acute Hip Pain-Suspected Fracture Acute Hip Pain-Suspected Fracture Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging: Andrew B. Ross, MD, MPHa; Kenneth S. Lee, MD, MBAb; Eric Y. Chang, MDc; Behrang Amini, MD, PhDd; Jennifer K. Bussell, MDe; Tetyana Gorbachova, MDf; Alice S. Ha, MDg; Bharti Khurana, MDh; Alan Klitzke, MDi; Pekka A.
    [Show full text]