DOCSLIB.ORG

Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2019 Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar Victoria Carter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Carter, Victoria, "Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar" (2019). Honors Theses. 2261. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/2261 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar By Victoria A. Carter ********** Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Political Science UNION COLLEGE June, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………v Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 I. Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………………………7 I.I. The Key Norm of International Relations……………………………………………..7 I.II. Norms in IR Literature……………………………………………………………………..10 I.III. The Life Cycle of Norms…………………………………………………………………..18 I.IV. Prevention of Genocide – An International Norm……………………………...20 II. Rwanda………………………………………………………………………………………………………..25 II.I. Warning Signs Ignored……………………………………………………………………..26 II.II. Mis-steps by the United Nations………………………………………………………30 II.III. British Action – Too Little Too Late? ………………………………………………33 II.IV. France – The Wrong Army to Intervene…………………………………………..36 II.V. The Clinton Administration – The True Bystander…………………………….39 II.VI. Implications of Rwanda…………………………………………………………………..43 III. Kosovo………………………………………………………………………………………………………...45 III.I. Origins of the Kosovo Genocide………………………………………………………..46 III.II. The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA)………………………………………………...52 III.III. The United States’ Will to Intervene……………………………………………….55 III.IV. The UK’s Adamancy to Intervene……………………………………………………60 III.V. French Intervention for Preservation………………………………………………63 III.VI. Criticism and Repercussions of Intervention…………………………………..66 IV. Libya…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...70 IV.I. The Emergence of R2P……………………………………………………………………..71 IV.IA. Darfur – The Test Case for R2P……………………………………………76 IV.II. The Twists & Turns of the Gaddafi Regime………………………………………78 IV.III. US Response to Libya…………………………………………………………………….84 IV.IV. UK Lobbying for Intervention………………………………………………………...89 IV.V. France Takes the Lead…………………………………………………………………….92 IV.VI. Implications for R2P After Libya…………………………………………………….94 V. Myanmar (Burma) ………………………………………………………………………………………..98 V.I. Continued Persecution of The Rohingya…………………………………………….99 V.II. UN on R2P and Myanmar……………………………………………………………….101 V.III. The United States Edging Towards Intervention? ………………………….110 V.IV. The UK’s Gradual Loss of R2P………………………………………………………..115 V.V. France’s Abrupt Change on R2P……………………………………………………...120 V.VI. R2P’s Regression…………………………………………………………………………..125 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………………127 References………………………………………………………………………………………………………131 ii ABSTRACT CARTER, VICTORIA Hope for Another Humanitarian Intervention? Rwanda, Kosovo, Libya and the Consequences of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) on Myanmar Department of Political Science, June 2019 ADVISOR: Cigdem Cidam After the catastrophic failure of the UN and western nations to prevent and halt genocide in Rwanda in 1990, many pledged “never again.” In less than ten years, the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo provided the international community with a chance at redemption. Without waiting for UN approval, NATO forces led a military intervention to stop Milošević’s campaign of violence against the Kosovo Albanians. The bombing of Kosovo is now considered to be the first ever intervention in another sovereign nation by the international community for humanitarian purposes. However, the lack of legal backing from UN rendered the intervention suspect, putting into question the moral justification of the bombing campaign which led to the death of many civilians. As such, the humanitarian intervention in Kosovo left many questions for the international community: Who should intervene to stop genocide or ethnic cleansing taking place in a given state? When should the international community intervene? What renders a humanitarian intervention legal from the perspective of international law? In the early 2000s, there was a shared sense in the international community that there was an urgent need to set an international framework for humanitarian intervention. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine aimed to provide that framework. Approaching the topic from the perspective of constructivist theory, the thesis describes how the R2P emerged as a potential international norm, cascaded through the international community, and then became diffused enough to be utilized by the UN to address the mass atrocities that took place in Darfur. The 2011 intervention in Libya became iii the test case for the R2P. Utilizing the R2P doctrine the Security Council approved a resolution that authorized use of force by the international community to stop mass atrocities in Libya by any means necessary. However, the moment of the R2P’s success was also its downfall. Many argued that NATO powers used R2P as an ideological tool to protect their national interests in Libya, instead of truly seeking to prevent genocide and other crimes against humanity for moral reasons. Despite the diffusion of R2P as a well accept norm and its use in the Security Council in 2011, the failure of intervention in Libya has led to the regression of the norm. I argue that this regression has caused the lack of humanitarian intervention in the ethnic cleansing and violence in Myanmar against the Rohingya population. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the help, guidance, and support of my advisor, Professor Cigdem Cidam. Thank you for inspiring me to find a genuine love for political theory and for the countless hours of dedication that proved to be an invaluable resource to me during my writing. Thank you to Professor Tom Lobe who sparked my interest in international relations and for pushing me to pursue my passion for the topic in my post-graduate career. Finally, I would like to dedicate this thesis to all of those who have lost their lives to genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other crimes against humanity. These losses have and must continue to inspire the international community to act to prevent and halt future atrocities, so that many thousands of innocent lives can be saved. v INTRODUCTION “The operations were designed to instill immediate terror, with people woken by intense rapid weapon fire, explosions or the shouts and screams of villagers. Structures were set ablaze, and…soldiers fired their guns indiscriminately into houses and fields, and at villagers.” “Houses were locked and set on fire. Few survived…bodies were transported in military vehicles, burned and disposed of in mass graves.” “Women and girls were systematically abducted, detained and raped in military and police compounds, often amounting to sexual slavery.” These statements describing the heinous acts of war crimes seem to be out of a history book. Yet, these and countless other atrocities are what have transpired in Myanmar over the last two years as detailed by the “Report of the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar” (A/HRC/39/64, 8/9). This violence began in 2016 and has continued to affect the lives of hundreds of Rohingya Muslims in Burma each day. Given the horrific nature of these well document crimes, why has the international community failed in its responsibility to protect the Rohingya population in Myanmar? In this thesis I address this question by focusing on the new norm of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) which has its roots in the norm preventing and prohibiting genocide. As I will argue in this thesis, R2P has developed over the past decade and due to its ideological use in Libya by the US, UK, and France, it has lost its hold in the international community. The regression of the R2P norm has thus made it impossible to intervene in the genocide in Myanmar. In December of 1948, Raphael Lemkin successfully lobbied the United Nations to adopt the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Lemkin fought for this resolution in light of the atrocities committed in the Holocaust and fear that those atrocities would be repeated against others in the future. Article I of the Genocide 1 Convention dictates that: “The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and punish” (“Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,” 1948). The crimes committed by Hitler and Nazi Germany were no longer to be tolerated or allowed to be perpetrated again by anyone in the international community. Since the development of the norm, 150 countries have ratified the resolution. The sad reality of the Cold War era that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FRANCE: a HOTBED of OPPOSITION to the TTIP? Elvire Fabry | Senior Research Fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute
    POLICY PAPER 136 10 JUNE 2015 FRANCE: A HOTBED OF OPPOSITION TO THE TTIP? Elvire Fabry | senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute SUMMARY Two years after the start of negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in July 2013, the evolution of French public opinion is intriguing. THE EVOLUTION OF FRENCH PUBLIC OPINION It was expected that opposition to TTIP would come primarily from France, IS INTRIGUING” where public opinion is traditionally wary of trade liberalisation. But in November 2014, when 59% of Europeans and 25 of 28 member states said they were in favour of TTIP, 50% of French held a favourable opinion while the Germans had become the leading opponents of TTIP. The shift in German public opinion in spring 2014 had not been anticipated, considering that the German econ- omy has turned towards exports and that the German government itself was active in supporting the launch of negotiations. Public debate over TTIP has only truly manifested in France during the European election campaigns of May 2014, when the minor parties opposed to negotiations put the spotlight on the sanitary, phytosanitary, and environmental issues of the negotiations. The two major political groups adopted a more cautious and even evasive approach, waiting until autumn 2014 to clearly state their positions. In summer 2014, meanwhile, the inclusion of a mechanism to resolve disputes between investor and state has imposed itself as a source of more mobilising fears and has united a cross-partisan opposition which has con- tributed to growing doubts over the benefits of the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • N° 1516 (Rectifié) ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE PROPOSITION DE
    N° 1516 (rectifié) ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 ONZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 31 mars 1999. PROPOSITION DE LOI relative à la création d’un Conseil de l’emploi, des revenus et de la cohésion sociale (CERC), (Renvoyée à la commission des affaires culturelles, familiales et sociales, à défaut de constitution d'une commission spéciale dans les délais prévus par les articles30 et 31 du Règlement.) PRESENTEE PAR MM. J EAN LE GARREC, JEAN -MARC AYRAULT, MAURICE ADEVAH-PŒUF, DAMIEN ALARY, LEO ANDY, JEAN -MARIE AUBRON, JEAN -PAUL BACQUET, DOMINIQUE BAERT, JEAN - PIERRE BAEUMLER, JEAN -PIERRE BALDUYCK, GERARD BAPT, ALAIN BARRAU, JACQUES BASCOU, JEAN -CLAUDE BATEUX, JEAN -CLAUDE BEAUCHAUD, ERIC BESSON, ANDRE BILLARDON, JEAN -PIERRE BLAZY, SERGE BLISKO, PATRICK BLOCHE, JEAN -CLAUDE BOIS, DANIEL BOISSERIE, AUGUSTIN BONREPAUX, JEAN -MICHEL BOUCHERON, DIDIER BOULAUD, PIERRE BOURGUIGNON, CHRISTIAN BOURQUIN, Mme DANIELLE BOUSQUET, MM. J EAN -PIERRE BRAINE, JEAN -PAUL BRET, Mme NICOLE BRICQ, MM. V INCENT BURRONI, MARCEL CABIDDU, ALAIN CACHEUX, JEROME CAHUZAC, ANDRE CAPET, THIERRY CARCENAC, CHRISTOPHE CARESCHE, Mme VERONIQUE CARRION-BASTOK, MM. L AURENT CATHALA, GUY -MICHEL CHAUVEAU, DANIEL CHEVALLIER, DIDIER CHOUAT, ALAIN CLAEYS, Mme MARIE -FRANÇOISE CLERGEAU, MM. J EAN CODOGNES, PIERRE COHEN, F RANÇOIS COLCOMBET, M me MONIQUE COLLANGE, MM. F RANÇOIS CUILLANDRE, JACKY DARNE, MICHEL DASSEUX, Mme MARTINE DAVID, MM. PHILIPPE DECAUDIN, MARCEL DEHOUX, JEAN DELOBEL, FRANÇOIS DELUGA, JEAN -JACQUES DENIS, Mme MONIQUE DENISE, MM. B ERNARD DEROSIER, CLAUDE DESBONS, MICHEL DESTOT, PAUL DHAILLE, MARC DOLEZ, FRANÇOIS DOSE, RENE DOSIERE, RAYMOND DOUYERE, PIERRE DUCOUT, JEAN -PIERRE DUFAU, JEAN -LOUIS DUMONT, Mme LAURENCE DUMONT, MM.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeudi 7 Février 2013
    JEUDI 7 FÉVRIER 2013 Code forestier Questions d’actualité Délais de prescription dans la loi sur la liberté de la presse Conventions fiscales avec Aruba et Oman (Procédure accélérée) SOMMAIRE REMPLACEMENT D’UN SÉNATEUR DÉCÉDÉ............................................................................ 1 CODE FORESTIER......................................................................................................................... 1 Discussion générale 1 M. Stéphane Le Foll, ministre de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt 1 M. Philippe Leroy, rapporteur de la commission des affaires économiques 1 Mme Bernadette Bourzai 2 Mme Mireille Schurch 3 M. Jean-Jacques Lasserre 3 M. Stéphane Mazars 3 M. Joël Labbé 4 M. Jackie Pierre 4 M. Claude Bérit-Débat 5 M. Stéphane Le Foll, ministre 5 Discussion des articles 5 Article premier 5 Mme Odette Herviaux 5 M. Martial Bourquin 5 Article 2 bis 5 Intervention sur l'ensemble 6 M. Jean-Jacques Mirassou 6 QUESTIONS D’ACTUALITÉ........................................................................................................... 6 Réforme de la PAC M. Alain Bertrand M. Guillaume Garot, ministre délégué chargé de l'agroalimentaire Dotations aux collectivités locales Mme Natacha Bouchart M. Jérôme Cahuzac, ministre délégué chargé du budget Situation économique de la France 7 M. François Zocchetto M. Arnaud Montebourg, ministre du redressement productif Chiffres du commerce extérieur M. Claude Bérit-Débat Mme Nicole Bricq, ministre du commerce extérieur 8 Mutilations sexuelles Mme Kalliopi Ango Ela Mme Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, ministre des droits des femmes Situation des hôpitaux Mme Annie David Mme Marisol Touraine, ministre des affaires sociales et de la santé 9 Transports franciliens M. Hugues Portelli M. Frédéric Cuvillier, ministre délégué chargé des transports Dépendance M. Ronan Kerdraon Mme Michèle Delaunay, ministre déléguée chargée des personnes âgées Librairie numérique 10 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Global Despondency Trap: Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains
    Overcoming the Global Despondency Trap: Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Evans, Alice. “Overcoming the Global Despondency Trap: Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains.” CID Working Paper Series 2019.367, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, October 2019. Published Version https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366405 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Overcoming the Global Despondency Trap: Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains Alice Evans CID Faculty Working Paper No. 367 October 2019 © Copyright 2019 Evans, Alice; and the President and Fellows of Harvard College Working Papers Center for International Development at Harvard University OVERCOMING THE GLOBAL DESPONDENCY TRAP Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains Alice Evans [email protected] Forthcoming in Review of International Political Economy This paper re-examines why global collective action problems persist, and how to overcome them. Drawing on 140 interviews with campaigners, politicians, and businesses in 10 European countries, it suggests that many activists are stuck in a despondency trap. Never seeing radical reform, they lower their ambitions, and invest in more feasible but sub-optimal alternatives. This creates a negative feedback loop, in which the dearth of radical reform becomes self-fulfilling.
    [Show full text]
  • French Government 2012
    Your Guide to the FRENCH GOVERNMENT June 2012 France, a founding member of the European Union, has a population of 65 million (including overseas territories) and is the fifth largest economy in the world.* In spring 2012, a few months before the highly anticipated American presidential elections and with the eurozone experiencing a major crisis, France held its presidential and legislative elections. Elected in May 2012, President François Hollande is the first Socialist French president to be elected since François Mitterrand, who left office in 1995. Hollande’s election represents a major shift in France’s leadership, as the Socialist Party and the French left have swept into power across the executive and legislative branches in a series of historic electoral victories. * Based on Gross Domestic Product (current prices) data in the International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, April 2012. What follows is your guide to the French government and a brief overview of the French political system: I. THE FRENCH INSTITUTIONS EXECUTIVE BRANCH // 2-3 SEPTEMBER 25, 2011 LEGISLATIVE BRANCH // 3-4 France votes the left into the Senate majority for the first II. THE NEW FRENCH PRESIDENT time in the Fifth Republic’s BIOGRAPHY // 5 history. AGENDA // 5-6 MAY 6, 2012 France elects François INAUGURATION SPEECH // 6 Hollande president of the III. THE NEW FRENCH GOVERNMENT Republic, the first Socialist president since 1995. THE PRIME MINISTER // 7 June 17, 2012 THE CABINET // 7-9 France gives the Socialist NATIONAL ASSEMBLY // 10-11 Party an absolute majority in the National Assembly. IV. RESOURCES // 12-13 V. ABOUT THE FOUNDATION // 14 This Guide was prepared by the French-American Foundation—United States Writers: Patrick Lattin & Eugénie Briet The French Institutions EXECUTIVE BRANCH France’s political system is organized as a semi-presidential republic, meaning that its executive branch is led both by a president and a prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Mediterranean Youth to Control and Build Our Common Destiny
    Michel VAUZELLE Member of Parliament Responsible for the Delegation Working with Mediterranean Youth to Control and Build our Common Destiny Report to the French President and Prime Minister By letter dated 20 September 2012, the framework for which was specified by letter and decree by the Prime Minister on 1 January 2013, the President of France asked the rapporteur to submit proposals encompassed under the scope of 'Mediterranean Projects'. Working with Mediterranean Youth to Control and Build our Common Destiny We no longer wish to die to live on the other shore. TOMORROW, THE MEDITERRANEAN Amidst the Reign of Terror and a regime that used massacre to deny the Revolution and Human Rights, France nevertheless continued to bear the message of 1789. From 1789 onwards, nothing would ever be the same again. It would take France more than a century to become a republic, but France will forever be the France of 1789. And, indeed, the fight is not over. Even today we must defend the Republic and pursue the process of the democratic, social and cultural liberation of our people. The same was true on 18 June 1940 when, at the very time that France had suffered defeat at the hands of Germany and was subjected to the Nazi regime, General de Gaulle broadcast his message of victory on France's behalf. Four years later, the Republic saved by the Resistance was once again thriving as a free nation under the National Council of the Resistance's programme. The Mediterranean has long since been experiencing the same as France did.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision No. 2011-625 DC of 10 March 2011
    Decision no. 2011-625 DC of 10 March 2011 [Law on guidelines and programming for the performance of internal security] In the conditions provided for by Article 61-2 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Council was seized of an application relating to the Law on guidelines and programming for the performance of internal security on 15 February 2011 by Mr Jean-Marc AYRAULT, Ms Sylvie ANDRIEUX, Messrs Gérard BAPT, Claude BARTOLONE, Jacques BASCOU, Christian BATAILLE, Ms Delphine BATHO, Ms Marie-Noëlle BATTISTEL, Messrs Serge BLISKO, Patrick BLOCHE, Daniel BOISSERIE, Ms Marie-Odile BOUILLÉ, Ms Monique BOULESTIN, Messrs Pierre BOURGUIGNON, François BROTTES, Alain CACHEUX, Thierry CARCENAC, Guy CHAMBEFORT, Jean-Michel CLÉMENT, Gilles COCQUEMPOT, Pierre COHEN, Ms Pascale CROZON, Messrs Frédéric CUVILLIER, Pascal DEGUILHEM, François DELUGA, Bernard DEROSIER, Michel DESTOT, René DOSIÈRE, Julien DRAY, Jean-Pierre DUFAU, William DUMAS, Jean-Louis DUMONT, Ms Laurence DUMONT, Messrs Jean-Paul DUPRÉ, Olivier DUSSOPT, Christian ECKERT, Hervé FÉRON, Pierre FORGUES, Ms Valérie FOURNEYRON, Mr Jean-Louis GAGNAIRE, Ms Geneviève GAILLARD, Messrs Jean-Patrick GILLE, Joël GIRAUD, Jean GLAVANY, Daniel GOLDBERG, Marc GOUA, Ms Élisabeth GUIGOU, Mr David HABIB, Ms Danièle HOFFMAN-RISPAL, Ms Sandrine HUREL, Ms Françoise IMBERT, Messrs Michel ISSINDOU, Serge JANQUIN, Henri JIBRAYEL, Régis JUANICO, Ms Marietta KARAMANLI, Messrs Jérôme LAMBERT, Jack LANG, Ms Colette LANGLADE, Mr Jean- Yves LE BOUILLONNEC, Ms Annick LE LOCH, Mr Bruno LE ROUX, Ms Catherine LEMORTON,
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION No. 2011 631 DC of 9 JUNE 2011
    Decision no. 2011−631 DC of 9 JUNE 2011 Law on immigration, integration and citizenship In the conditions provided for by Article 61-2 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Council was seized of an application relating to the Law on immigration, integration and citizenship on 17 May 2011 by Mr Jean−Pierre BEL, Ms Michèle ANDRÉ, Messrs Alain ANZIANI, David ASSOULINE, Bertrand AUBAN, Claude BÉRIT−DÉBAT, Ms Marie−Christine BLANDIN, Ms Maryvonne BLONDIN, Mr Yannick BODIN, Ms Nicole BONNEFOY, Messrs Yannick BOTREL, Didier BOULAUD, Ms Alima BOUMEDIENE−THIERY, Mr Martial BOURQUIN, Ms Bernadette BOURZAI, Mr Michel BOUTANT, Ms Nicole BRICQ, Messrs Jean−Pierre CAFFET, Jean−Louis CARRÈRE, Ms Françoise CARTRON, Mr Bernard CAZEAU, Ms Monique CERISIER−ben−GUIGA, Messrs Yves CHASTAN, Roland COURTEAU, Yves DAUDIGNY, Jean−Pierre DEMERLIAT, Ms Christiane DEMONTÈS, Messrs Jean DESESSARD, Claude DOMEIZEL, Bernard FRIMAT, Charles GAUTIER, Serge GODARD, Didier GUILLAUME, Edmond HERVÉ, Ronan KERDRAON, Ms Bariza KHIARI, Messrs Yves KRATTINGER, Serge LAGAUCHE, Jacky LE MENN, Ms Raymonde LE TEXIER, Ms Claudine LEPAGE, Messrs Jean−Jacques LOZACH, Roger MADEC, Marc MASSION, Rachel MAZUIR, Jean−Pierre MICHEL, Gérard MIQUEL, Jean−Jacques MIRASSOU, Ms Renée NICOUX, Messrs François PATRIAT, Bernard PIRAS, Ms Gisèle PRINTZ, Messrs Daniel RAOUL, François REBSAMEN, Daniel REINER, Thierry REPENTIN, Michel SERGENT, René−Pierre SIGNÉ, Jean−Pierre SUEUR, Simon SUTOUR, Ms Catherine TASCA, Messrs Michel TESTON, René TEULADE, Richard YUNG, Mmes Nicole BORVO COHEN−SEAT, Eliane
    [Show full text]
  • N° 144 Du 22 Juin 2012
    22 juin 2012 JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Texte 1 sur 93 DÉCRET DU 21 JUIN 2012 RELATIF À LA COMPOSITION DU GOUVERNEMENT NOR : HRUX1226941D Le Président de la République, Vu l’article 8 de la Constitution ; Vu le décret du 18 juin 2012 portant nomination du Premier ministre ; Sur proposition du Premier ministre, Décrète : Art. 1er.−Sont nommés ministres : M. Laurent Fabius, ministre des affaires étrangères ; M. Vincent Peillon, ministre de l’éducation nationale ; Mme Christiane Taubira, garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice ; M. Pierre Moscovici, ministre de l’économie et des finances ; Mme Marisol Touraine, ministre des affaires sociales et de la santé ; Mme Cécile Duflot, ministre de l’égalité des territoires et du logement ; M. Manuel Valls, ministre de l’intérieur ; Mme Nicole Bricq, ministre du commerce extérieur ; M. Arnaud Montebourg, ministre du redressement productif ; Mme Delphine Batho, ministre de l’écologie, du développement durable et de l’énergie ; M. Michel Sapin, ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social ; M. Jean-Yves Le Drian, ministre de la défense ; Mme Aurélie Filippetti, ministre de la culture et de la communication ; Mme Geneviève Fioraso, ministre de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche ; Mme Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, ministre des droits des femmes, porte-parole du Gouvernement ; M. Stéphane Le Foll, ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt ; Mme Marylise Lebranchu, ministre de la réforme de l’Etat, de la décentralisation et de la fonction publique ; M. Victorin Lurel, ministre des outre-mer ; Mme Sylvia Pinel, ministre de l’artisanat, du commerce et du tourisme ; Mme Valérie Fourneyron, ministre des sports, de la jeunesse, de l’éducation populaire et de la vie associative.
    [Show full text]
  • Francouzská Jaderná Energetika Za Vlády François Hollanda
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií Evropská studia Francouzská jaderná energetika za vlády François Hollanda Bakalářská práce Hana Mišove Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Jan Osička Ph.D. UČO: 391115 Obor: EVS-HOSP Imatrikulační ročník: 2011 Brno, 2014 Prohlášení o autorství práce Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci Francouzská jaderná energetika za vlády François Hollanda vypracovala samostatně a použila pouze zdroje uvedené v seznamu literatury. V Brně, 12. 2. 2014 ……………..………………… Hana Mišove Poděkování Ráda bych tímto poděkovala svému vedoucímu Mgr. Janu Osičkovi Ph.D za ochotu a pomoc, kterou mi při psaní práce poskytl. Anotace Práce se zabývá tím, jak současné francouzské politické elity, konkrétně francouzský prezident, premiér a ministr ekologie, rámují problematiku jaderné energetiky ve Francii. První část je věnována teoretickému rámci práce. Druhá obsahuje samotnou analýzu rámování, která se na jádro soustředí zejména v kontextu plánované energetické tranzice, jež má zavést výrazné snížení jeho podílu ve francouzském energetickém mixu. Vychází z nejrůznějších projevů, rozhovorů, ale i tiskových zpráv vybraných elit. Abstract This thesis deals with the way the current French political elites, namely the French President, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Ecology, frame the issue of nuclear energy in France. The first part is devoted to theoretical framework. The second part contains the frame analysis which primarily focuses on nuclear power in the context of the planned
    [Show full text]
  • THE EU, ALGERIA and the NORTHERN MALI QUESTION Susi Dennison
    MEMO POLICY THE EU, ALGERIA AND THE NORTHERN MALI QUESTION Susi Dennison Algeria – whose immediate neighbours include Libya, SUMMARY Relations between the EU and Algeria have Tunisia, and Mali – has been notable in its region in recent always been dominated by the bilateral ties years for its apparent lack of unrest. However, the limited that Algeria has with a cluster of member states, nature of protests in Algiers at the beginning of 2011 belied most notably France, based on strong energy a restive population that is frustrated with an aging and and security, and historical links. In early 2012, when the EU appeared to be in the ascendant, ineffective regime, and a socio-economic deal in which it offered Algeria support for growth and the proceeds from exporting oil and gas are invested only enterprise in exchange for the promise of sporadically in public goods, such as housing, in order to political reform. However, the violent Islamist buy social peace. Algeria is still the “insecure regime in an takeover in northern Mali has turned the EU unstable neighbourhood” as it was last year.1 into the demandeur in the relationship and could put the progress made earlier this year in jeopardy. France and the United States firmly However, while the regime remains insecure, the back a UN-mandated African intervention in neighbourhood has become dramatically less stable as Mali. But Algeria, which is viewed as a crucial northern Mali has come under Islamist control. After a partner, is reluctant to support intervention decade of internal armed conflict in the 1990s between because it fears that this could increase instability in its immediate neighbourhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Officiel De La République Française
    o Année 2013. – N 133 [2] A.N. (C.R.) ISSN 0242-6765 Jeudi 14 novembre 2013 ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2013-2014 61e séance Compte rendu intégral 2e séance du mercredi 13 novembre 2013 Les articles, amendements et annexes figurent dans le fascicule bleu ci-joint http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr 11398 ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE – 2e SÉANCE DU 13 NOVEMBRE 2013 SOMMAIRE PRÉSIDENCE DE M. CLAUDE BARTOLONE AIDES POUR LA BRETAGNE (p. 11406) M. Gilles Lurton 1. Solidarité avec le peuple philippin (p. 11400) M. Stéphane Le Foll, ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroali- 2. Questions au Gouvernement (p. 11400) mentaire et de la forêt AIDE MÉDICALE D’ÉTAT (p. 11400) LOI D’AVENIR AGRICOLE (p. 11407) M. Dominique Tian M. Dominique Potier Mme Dominique Bertinotti, ministre déléguée chargée de la M. Stéphane Le Foll, ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroali- famille mentaire et de la forêt LUTTE CONTRE LE RACISME (p. 11401) BUDGET DES ARMÉES (p. 11408) M. Bruno Le Roux M. Jacques Lamblin M. Jean-Marc Ayrault, Premier ministre M. Kader Arif, ministre délégué chargé des anciens combat- tants PROGRAMME NUCLÉAIRE IRANIEN (p. 11402) DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE (p. 11408) M. Meyer Habib Mme Paola Zanetti M. Laurent Fabius, ministre des affaires étrangères M. Kader Arif, ministre délégué chargé des anciens combat- tants LUTTE CONTRE LE RACISME (p. 11402) Mme Barbara Pompili RÉGULARISATIONS D’IMMIGRANTS IRRÉGULIERS (p. 11409) Mme Aurélie Filippetti, ministre de la culture et de la communication M. Didier Quentin M. Alain Vidalies, ministre délégué chargé des relations avec RYTHMES SCOLAIRES (p.
    [Show full text]