Russia's Policy on Secessionism in the United
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RUSSIA’S POLICY ON SECESSIONISM IN THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MEHMET ZEKİ GÜNAY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JUNE 2016 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Özlem Tür Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Fırat Purtaş (Gazi University, IR) Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya Biletska (Karabük Uni, IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Mehmet Zeki Günay Signature : iii ABSTRACT RUSSIA’S POLICY ON SECESSIONISM IN THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL Günay, Mehmet Zeki Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever June 2016, 259 pages This dissertation examines Russia’s policy on secessionism in Kosovo (Serbia), Abkhazia and South Ossetia (Georgia), and Crimea (Ukraine) in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). It aims to compare and contrast Russia’s stance on these different cases of secessionism that have been brought to the agenda of the UNSC. Contrary to the views of some experts who claim that Russia’s references to issues concerning identity and international law during the debates on secessionism in the UNSC reflect Russia’s commitment to the principles of international law and its support to the selected identities, this dissertation argues that Russia’s positions on identity issues and international law are driven mainly by its pragmatic concerns in order to enhance its regional power and influence. This argument is supported by Russia’s inconsistencies in its approach to international law and identity matters. To this end, firstly, the literature on international relations of ethnic conflicts and secessionism, and theories of International Relations is discussed. Secondly, the dissertation examines the evolution of secessionism in Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and Crimea. Thirdly, it analyzes post-Soviet Russia’s foreign and domestic policy on Kosovo, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Crimea. Later, it discusses Russia’s responses and policy choices concerning each case in the UNSC. The dissertation aims to identify the underlying determinants of Russia’s ‘varying’ responses to secessionism. Studying Russia’s position on secessionism in the UN in the post-Cold iv War era is significant not only for understanding ‘Russia in the UN’ but also Russia’s broader foreign policy choices Keywords: Russian Foreign Policy, Secessionism, United Nations Security Council, Kosovo, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Crimea v ÖZ RUSYA’NIN BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER GÜVENLİK KONSEYİ’NDE AYRILIKÇILIĞA YÖNELİK SİYASETİ Günay, Mehmet Zeki Doktora, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever Haziran 2016, 259 sayfa Bu tez Rusya’nın Kosova (Sırbistan), Abhazya ve Güney Osetya (Gürcistan), ve Kırım’daki (Ukrayna) ayrılıkçı hareketlere yönelik Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’ndeki (BMGK) siyasetini incelemektedir. Tezde BMGK gündemine getirilen bu farklı ayrılıkçı hareketlere karşı Rusya’nın tutumunun kıyaslanması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu çalışma bazı uzmanların öne sürdüğü gibi Rusya’nın ayrılıkçı hareketler üzerine BMGK’de yapılan tartışmalar sırasında kimlik ve uluslararası hukukla ilgili meselelere yaptığı göndermelerin Rusya’nın ilgili kimliklere olan desteğini ve uluslararası hukuk prensiplerine olan bağlılığını yansıtmadığını, aksine Rusya’nın kimlik ve uluslararası hukukla ilgili meselelere yaklaşımının esasen bölgesel güç ve etkisini arttırmaya yönelik pragmatik kaygılarına bağlı olarak şekillendiği fikrini savunmaktadır. Bu argüman Rusya’nın uluslararası hukuk ilkelerine ve kimlik meselelerine yaklaşımındaki tutarsızlıklarla desteklenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, ilk olarak etnik çatışmalar ve ayrılıkçı hareketlerin uluslararası ilişkiler boyutu ile Uluslararası İlişkiler teorileri literatürü tartışılmaktadır. İkinci olarak, Sovyet-sonrası Rusya’nın Kosova, Abhazya, Güney Osetya, ve Kırım’a yönelik dış ve iç politikası tartışılmaktadır. Sonrasında, Sovyet-sonrası Rusya’nın Birleşmiş Milletler çatısı altında bu örneklere yönelik tepkisi ve politikaları incelenmektedir. Bu tez, Rusya’nın ayrılıkçı hareketlere ilişkin değişkenlik gösteren tepkilerinin altında yatan etkenleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Rusya’nın Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde ayrılıkçılık meselesine BMGK’deki yaklaşımının incelenmesi sadece vi Rusya’nın Birleşmiş Milletler’deki siyasetini anlamak için değil aynı zamanda Rusya’nın daha geniş kapsamlı dış politika seçimlerini kavramak için de çok önemlidir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Rus Dış Politikası, Ayrılıkçılık, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi, Kosova, Abhazya, Güney Osetya, Kırım vii To My Wife viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to express my deepest thanks to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever for his academic as well as personal support, guidance, advice, criticism and encouragement throughout this research. I would also like to thank to the members of my dissertation committee: Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık, Prof. Dr. Fırat Purtaş, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu and Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya Biletska for their invaluable support, contributions and comments. I also wish to offer my special thanks to Ambassador Ertuğrul Apakan and the Permanent Mission of Turkey to the United Nations, particularly Ms. Elif Çalışkan, Mr. A. Noyan Özkaya and Mr. Bilal Emre Biral for undertaking the necessary arrangements for this research in New York. I am also grateful to the Middle East Technical University (METU) Graduate School of Social Sciences for its financial support, through BAP-07-03-2013-019 project, needed for the field research of this dissertation in New York and Washington. Finally, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my wife, parents, sister and aunts living in Ankara for their continuous support during this research. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM...........................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. iv ÖZ .............................................................................................................................. vi DEDICATION ........................................................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... x LIST OF MAPS ....................................................................................................... xii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................. xiv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Scope and Objective ............................................................................. 2 1.2 Literature Review .................................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology ....................................................................................... 22 1.4 Structure of the Dissertation ................................................................ 22 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................. 25 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 25 2.2 Realist Theories of International Relations ......................................... 25 2.3 Liberal Theories of International Relations ........................................ 40 2.4 Constructivist Theories of International Relations .............................. 43 2.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................... 47 3. KOSOVO ....................................................................................................... 48 3.1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 48 3.2. Evolution of the Secessionist Movement in Kosovo .......................... 48 3.3. Russian Foreign and Domestic Policy on Kosovo .............................. 62 3.4. Russia’s Policy on Secessionism in Kosovo in the UNSC ................. 74 3.5. Sources of Russia’s Policy on Secessionism in Kosovo ..................... 88 3.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................... 95 x 4. ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA