DOCSLIB.ORG

International Law: Russia's Instrument for Acquiring State Interests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Law: Russia's Instrument for Acquiring State Interests International Law: Russia's Instrument for Acquiring State Interests Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Korns, Samantha Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 12:31:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/641732 1 INTERNATIONAL LAW: RUSSIA’S INSTRUMENT FOR ACQUIRING STATE INTERESTS by Samantha Korns ____________________________ Copyright © Samantha Korns 2020 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF RUSSIAN AND SLAVIC STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2020 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Master’s Committee, we certify that we have read the thesis prepared by Samantha Korns, titled International Law: Russia’s Instrument for Acquiring State Interests, and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Master’s Degree. 3 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..…5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..….6 Historical Overview of International Law………………………………………………..7 Domestic Law in Russia…………………………………………………………………10 International Law in Imperial, Soviet, and Post-Soviet Contexts……………………….13 Chapter 1: Literature Review………………………………………………………………….20 Russian Law: A Historical Overview………………………………………...……….....21 Russia’s Approach to International Law………………………………………………...22 Russian Views of the International Order……………………………………………….26 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………… 28 Chapter 2, Crimea: International Law and the Violation of Statehood……………………30 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...30 History of Ukraine and Russian Tension……………………………………………….. 31 The Political Catalyst: Ukraine in the Cross-Roads between Russia and the West…….33 Why Did Russia Annex Crimea? Putin’s Position…………………...………………… 35 The European Union’s Perspective of the Annexation of Crimea……………………… 38 Military Intervention in Crimea………………………………………………………… 41 The Rules of International Law and Sovereignty: United Nations……………………... 44 The Helsinki Final Act…………………………………………………………………...48 The International Community Responds……………………………………………...... 51 Conclusion: Crimea—Russia’s First Successful Initiative to Undermining International Law………………………………………………………………………………………53 Chapter 3 Airspace…………………………………………………………...………………...57 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...57 Sovereignty and Jurisdiction, the History of Airspace…………………………………. 58 Nature and Character of Rights Over Airspace………………………………………... 59 Sovereignty and Trespass in Territorial Airspace……………………………………… 62 Deliberate Intrusion by State and Civil Aircrafts………………………………………. 63 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare……………………………………………………………….. 65 The Baltics, Russian State Aircraft Aerial Trespass……………………………………. 67 Putin’s Argument……………………………………………………………………….. 72 Conclusion, Russia's Pattern of International Law Violations of "Space"……………... 73 Chapter 4 Internet Law………………………………………………………………………...76 Role of International Law Concerning the Regulation of the Internet…………………..77 Access to the Internet as a Human Right………………………………………………...80 Russia’s “zakon o suverennom internete” (Sovereign Internet law) ……………………84 The Use of Force and the Right of Self-Defense in Cyberspace, Putin’s Defense………85 4 The “Sovereign Internet” law Affects Human Rights…………………………………...87 Russia Violates International law………………………………………………………..92 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………95 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...100 5 Abstract Over the last decade research has shown that the stability of international law has been threatened by Russia’s actions including the annexation of Crimea, breaches of airspace, and the approval of the “Sovereign Internet” law. This thesis seeks to examine Russia’s utilization of international law as an instrument to pursue national interests. Expanding on existing research of Russia’s international law violations, it asks: what are the long-term ramifications if Russia’s actions continue to go unpunished? In this context international law violations refer to Russia’s divergence from agreements that it previously consented to. Based on a literature review of international legal documents and Russia’s state first ideology, the following research analyzes three case studies on Russia’s violations of sovereignty and internationally recognized human rights. The case studies indicate that Russia’s violations of international law will only escalate as it attempts to assert itself as a global superpower. Further research is needed to identify what factors might align Russia’s approach to international legal practices with democratic values. 6 Introduction In 2014 Russia shocked the world when it illegally annexed Crimea. This action has become one of the most well-known political events in the 21st century leaving scholars and world leaders muddled with the question “why and how did this happen?” While there is a variety of scholarship that attempts to answer these questions, the Crimean crisis is merely the first large-scale successful international law violation that was the catalyst of a pattern of violations to come for Russia. The last decade has proven that Russia’s international law violations under the guise of national interests has only escalated in its severity and approach as the world evolves and transcends space. In 2014, Russia invaded and disrupted the sovereign statehood and physical borders of Ukraine to annex the Crimean Peninsula, a territory that is culturally important to Russia but also strategically valuable on the Black Sea. Beginning in 2015 Russian military aircraft have increased the frequency of aerial trespasses into the sovereign airspace of the Baltic countries. Entering into the airspace illegally of another country, strikes fear, without consideration, of the sovereign government and therefore people of these states. Then, in 2019, Russia passed the “Sovereign Internet” law that is striving towards a Russian Internet that has the capability to censor and isolate people within Russia from the rest of the world. As time goes on, Russia not only continues to break international law principles but invents new ways to do so. The following research provides the scope of Russia’s power and concludes with the argument that Russia has the capability to devalue international law for the benefit of sovereign gain which in turn questions the efficacy and literal significance of international law and interstate cooperation. 7 Historical Overview of International Law Russia’s violation of international law is not an anomaly. In fact, international law has always been a contested concept. Although it is clear that states exercised rudimentary notions of international law in ancient Greece and the Roman Empire, it was not until the early 17th century, at the start of the Thirty Years’ War, that the need of rules for the conduct of nations became a discussion at the forefront of European countries. Hugo Grotius, an acclaimed Dutch philosopher and legal scholar, inspired by the war, drafted the De Jure Belli ac Pacis (On the Law of War and Peace) in 1625 (Foster 149). Grotius’s De Jure Belli ac Pacis was formed on the foundation of Christianity and the law of nature with the hope of constructing international rules that would provide a more humane method of conducting war and resolving conflict (Foster 152). With the approval of sovereign states, the De Jure Belli ac Pacis legal document became the “first serious attempt at the codification of international law, or at putting forth well-defined and precise rules for the government of States in their international relations” (Foster 152). Following Grotius’s efforts to create rules to combat war and promote peace, the Congress of Westphalia sought to establish a treaty of peace that sovereign states would recognize, sign, and implement. The 1648 Treaty of Westphalia not only brought an end to the adverse period of European history and war, but the treaty is argued to be the start of the modern international system. The treaty recognized sovereignty of the States of Europe and their right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction within their own territory, among other provisions (Foster 153). Today, international law has evolved into a more defined concept. According to the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Foreign Relations of the Law of the United States (1987): 8 International law, as used in this Restatement, consists of rules and principles of general application dealing with the conduct of states and of international organizations and with persons, whether natural or juridical. [Third restatement, section 1] International law is an umbrella term that houses the institutions and doctrines which establish the rules and principles that states shall abide by to ensure global peace and security. Not every principle is considered customary, meaning that it applies to all nations without the need for states to consent (formally agree) to the principle. One such example of customary law involves the principle of non-intervention. The restriction of threat and forced intervention into another state’s territory, as detailed in the United Nations Charter Article 2(4), is considered binding and must
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2000, No.6
    www.ukrweekly.com 1NS1DE: - NATO chief visits Ukraine - page 3. 9 Ukrainian American veterans seeks federal charter - page 6. - Millennium musings, from a philatelic angle - centerfold. Г- v THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association inc., a fraternal non-profit association vol. LXVIII No. 6 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 6,2000 Ф1.25782 in Ukraine Davos economic forum Center-right majority elects Pliusch as new chairman of Rada marred by allegations of Kyiv's misuse of funds by Roman Woronowycz Kyiv Press Bureau KYiv - Ukraine's President Leonid Kuchma traveled to Davos, Switzerland, on January 28-30 for the annual World Economic Forum to talk about the begin- ning of serious economic reforms in Ukraine and to cajole foreign investment for the country. His effort was sidetracked, however, as allegations surfaced that mem- bers of his administration had bilked the international Monetary Fund out of more than a half billion dollars in credits in 1997. As the president arrived at the economic forum, the respected London newspaper the Financial Times on January 28 was report- ing accusations leveled by Pavlo Lazarenko, a former prime minister of Ukraine, that cronies of President Kuchma had embezzled and then laundered S613 million dollars of 1MF money in December President Leonid Kuchma (right) speaks with the newly elected chairman of the verkhovna Rada, ivan Pliusch (second from left), 1997. who is flanked by his two deputies, Yiktor Medvedchuk (left) and Stepan Havrysh. Mr. Lazarenko, who has been indicted by Roman Woronowycz of the Soviet era. majority in declarations he made during on charges of financial improprieties in Kyiv Press Bureau The lawmakers also reasserted their his re-election campaign, greeted the intent to remove Soviet era symbols from election of a new parliamentary leader- (Continued on page 3) KYiv - The political rupture within the facade and interior of the verkhovna ship as "an outstanding event." Ukraine's verkhovna Rada continued on Rada building.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Situation on Access of Persons with Disabilities to Electoral and Political Processes in Ukraine
    ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION ON ACCESS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES TO ELECTORAL AND POLITICAL PROCESSES IN UKRAINE Kyiv, Ukraine Assessment of the Situation on Access of Persons with Disabilities to Electoral and Political Processes in Ukraine 2015 This report was developed with technical support from the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) and financial support from the Government of Canada and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of IFES, the Government of Canada or USAID. Assessment of the Situation on Access of Persons with Disabilities to Electoral and Political Processes in Ukraine Copyright © 2015 International Foundation for Electoral Systems. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of IFES. Requests for permission should include the following information: • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, email address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW, Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 Email: [email protected] Fax: 202-350-6701 Acknowledgements On behalf of the implementers of this project we thank all those without whom this research and this report would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012/2889(Rsp))
    P7_TA(2012)0507 Situation in Ukraine European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2012 on the situation in Ukraine 2012/2889(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports, in particular those of 1 December 2011 containing the European Parliament’s recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the EEAS on the negotiations on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement1 and of 24 May 2012 on the situation in Ukraine and the case of Yulia Tymoshenko2, – having regard to the interim reports and preliminary conclusions of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission to Ukraine, in particular the Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions, issued on 29 October 2012 jointly with the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the European Parliament and the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, – having regard to the joint statement on the parliamentary elections in Ukraine issued by High Representative Catherine Ashton and Commissioner Štefan Füle on 12 November 2012, – having regard to the Council conclusions on Ukraine of 10 December 2012, – having regard to the statement made by former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski and former European Parliament President Pat Cox on 3 October 2012, stating that the elections will be ‘decisive’ for the future of Ukraine and that the ‘momentum in EU- Ukraine relations has stalled’, – having regard to the report of Parliament’s ad hoc election observation delegation to the parliamentary elections in Ukraine, presented at the Committee of Foreign Affairs meeting of 6 November 2012, – having regard to the EU-Ukraine Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation, adopted on 22 November 2010, – having regard to the ENP Progress Report on Ukraine, published on 15 May 2012, – having regard to Rule 110(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure, A.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • ROLLING BACKWARD Russia’S Troubled Relations with Its Neighbors Table of Contents Features
    per VOLUME 5, ISSUE 4, 2014 ConcordiamJournal of European Security and Defense Issues RUSSIAN REVISIONISM EXAMINING EU POLICY Moscow undermines European order The lessons from Ukraine THE NORDIC VIEW PLUS Finland weighs its neutrality Montenegro’s Road to the EU ORGANIZED CRIME Building Partnerships How it corrupts Russia Reviewing NATO Priorities ROLLING BACKWARD Russia’s Troubled Relations with its Neighbors Table of Contents features ON THE COVER Russia’s recent actions in Ukraine — aggressive rhetoric and nationalist symbolism, eerily reminiscent of the Cold War — have raised fears that the Kremlin may be adopting a revanchist strategy to reassert control over former Soviet- era republics. AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE 18 10 Explaining Russian Behavior 24 EU Enlargement to the East By Dr. Gregory Gleason, Marshall Center By Dr. Katrin Böttger, deputy director of the Russia’s actions in Ukraine have Institute for European Politics, Berlin shattered a carefully constructed post- Russia views economic treaties with Cold War consensus. Ukraine as intrusions into its sphere of influence. 18 Curbing Russian Aggression By Valentyn Badrak, director, Center for Army NATO’s Northern Edge Conversion and Disarmament Studies, Ukraine 30 By Tuomas Forsberg, professor of international The international community must relations, University of Tampere, Finland be assertive in deterring violations of Finland is reconsidering its neutral Ukraine’s sovereignty. status as a result of aggressive behavior from Moscow. departments COOPERATION 50 Redefining NATO By Dr. Teodora Crina Popescu, International Defense Cooperation Directorate, Romanian Ministry of Defense The Alliance has been forced to re-evaluate its mission in light of actions to the east. 54 Building Social Capital By Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War
    Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War TARAS KUZIO This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War TARAS KUZIO ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2020 ISBN 978-1-910814-55-0 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Cover Image: Triff/Shutterstock A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Russia Competing from Advantageous Ground
    Extending Russia Competing from Advantageous Ground James Dobbins, Raphael S. Cohen, Nathan Chandler, Bryan Frederick, Edward Geist, Paul DeLuca, Forrest E. Morgan, Howard J. Shatz, Brent Williams C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3063 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0021-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Pete Soriano/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of the RAND Corporation research project Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground, sponsored by the Army Quadrennial Defense Review Office, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-8, Headquarters, Department of the Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Policy on Secessionism in the United
    RUSSIA’S POLICY ON SECESSIONISM IN THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MEHMET ZEKİ GÜNAY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JUNE 2016 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Özlem Tür Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Fırat Purtaş (Gazi University, IR) Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya Biletska (Karabük Uni, IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Mehmet Zeki Günay Signature : iii ABSTRACT RUSSIA’S POLICY ON SECESSIONISM IN THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL Günay, Mehmet Zeki Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever June 2016, 259 pages This dissertation examines Russia’s policy on secessionism in Kosovo (Serbia), Abkhazia and South Ossetia (Georgia), and Crimea (Ukraine) in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Law on National
    Strasbourg, 17 June 2013 CDL-AD(2013)017 Opinion No. 705 / 2012 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE LAW ON NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF UKRAINE Adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 45th meeting (Venice, 13 June 2013) and by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 June 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Member, Hungary) Mr Angel SANCHEZ NAVARRO (Member, Spain) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int -2- CDL-AD(2013)017 Table of content I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Comments on the Text of the Law ........................................................................................ 4 A. General remarks on the new law on referendum ............................................................... 4 B. Provisions on changing the Constitution through a referendum. ....................................... 6 C. Some specific comments on the concrete articles of the new law on referendum ............. 8 1. General provisions ........................................................................................................ 8 2. Wording of the referendum questions ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cdl-Pi(2020)009
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 21 July 2020 CDL-PI(2020)009 Opinion No. 990/2020 Or. Engl. OSCE/ODIHR Opinion Nr ELE-UKR/383/2020 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (ODIHR) UKRAINE URGENT JOINT OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW 3612 ON DEMOCRACY THROUGH ALL-UKRAINE REFERENDUM Issued pursuant to Article 14 a of the Venice Commission’s Rules of Procedure on the basis of comments by Mr Nicos ALIVIZATOS (Member, Greece) Mr Josep Maria CASTELLÀ ANDREU (Member, Spain) Ms Marla MORRY (Expert, ODIHR) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-PI(2020)009 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. Scope of the Joint Opinion ............................................................................................ 3 III. Executive summary ....................................................................................................... 4 IV. General remarks ........................................................................................................... 5 V. Analysis and recommendations ..................................................................................... 6 A. Types of national referendum and their effects .......................................................... 7 B. Restrictions on the conduct of national referendums. ............................................... 10
    [Show full text]
  • Discordant Neighbours Ii CONTENTS Eurasian Studies Library
    CONTENTS i Discordant Neighbours ii CONTENTS Eurasian Studies Library Editors-in-Chief Sergei Bogatyrev School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London Dittmar Schorkowitz Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle/Saale, Germany Board Members ildikó bellér-hann – paul bushkovitch – peter finke geoffrey hosking – mikhail khodarkovsky marlène laruelle – virginia martin david schimmelpenninck van der oye – willard sunderland VOLUME 3 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/esl CONTENTS iii Discordant Neighbours A Reassessment of the Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-South Ossetian Conflicts By George Hewitt LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Coveriv illustration: Whilst the map on the front-coverCONTENTS delineates the frontiers of the former Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, the areas in green represent the republics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as recognised by Russia (26 August 2008) and five other UN member-states; red indicates the territory subject to the writ of the Georgian government and thus the reduced frontiers of today’s Republic of Georgia. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hewitt, B. G. Discordant neighbours : a reassessment of the Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-South- Ossetian conflicts / by George Hewitt. pages cm. -- (Eurasian studies library, ISSN 1877-9484 ; volume 3) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-24892-2 (hardback : acid-free paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-24893-9 (e-book) 1. Georgia (Republic)--Relations--Georgia--Abkhazia. 2. Georgia (Republic)--Relations--Georgia-- South Ossetia. 3. Abkhazia (Georgia)--Relations--Georgia (Republic) 4. South Ossetia (Georgia)-- Relations--Georgia (Republic) 5. Ethnic conflict--Georgia. 6. Georgia (Republic)--Ethnic relations. 7. Georgia (Republic)--History--1991- 8.
    [Show full text]