DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Domain in Nuclear Proteins Peter Stoilov, Ilona Rafalska and Stefan Stamm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Domain in Nuclear Proteins Peter Stoilov, Ilona Rafalska and Stefan Stamm Research Update TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.27 No.10 October 2002 495 Summary 2 Haering, C.H. et al. (2002) Molecular architecture differential regulation along arms versus the The recent structural studies have of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. centric region. Cell 98, 249–259 narrowed down the number of possible Mol. Cell 9, 773–788 13 Laloraya, S. et al. (2000) Chromosomal addresses 3 Losada, A. et al. (2000) Identification and of the cohesin component Mcd1p. J. Cell Biol. 151, models for sister chromatid cohesion and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the 1047–1056 provide a clearer view of how the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J. Cell 14 Ciosk, R. et al. (2000) Cohesin’s binding to components of the cohesin complex Biol. 150, 405–416 chromosomes depends on a separate complex interact. Nonetheless, several key 4 Sumara, I. et al. (2000) Characterization of consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, questions regarding the mechanism of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their 243–254 regulation in prophase. J. Cell Biol. 151, 15 Hartman, T. et al. (2000) Pds5p is an essential sister chromatid cohesion still need to be 749–762 chromosomal protein required for both sister addressed: can cohesins form higher-order 5 Pasierbek, P. et al. (2001) A Caenorhabditis chromatid cohesion and condensation in structures, how is the cohesin complex elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 151, recruited to specific regions of the chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev. 613–626 15, 1349–1360 16 Panizza, S. et al. (2000) Pds5 cooperates with chromosome, how does the passage of the 6 Hirano, T. (2002) The ABCs of SMC proteins: cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. replication fork lead to the linkage of sister two-armed ATPases for chromosome Curr. Biol. 10, 1557–1564 chromatids and what role does ATP condensation, cohesion, and repair. Genes Dev. 16, 17 Skibbens, R.V. et al. (1999) Ctf7p is essential for hydrolysis play in sister chromatid 399–414 sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic cohesion. Undoubtedly, the establishment 7 Hirano, M. et al. (2001) Bimodal activation of chromosome structure to the DNA replication SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular machinery. Genes Dev. 13, 307–319 and maintenance of sister chromatid interactions. EMBO J. 20, 3238–3250 18 Ross, K.E. et al. (2002) Separase: a conserved cohesin is a dynamic process and many of 8 Cohen-Fix, O. (2001) The making and protease separating more than just sisters. its moving parts still need to be elucidated. breaking of sister chromatid cohesion. Cell 106, Trends Cell Biol. 12, 1–3 137–140 19 Dej, K.J. et al. (2000) Separation anxiety at the Acknowledgements 9 Toth, A. et al. (1999) Yeast cohesin complex centromere. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 392–399 requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), 20 Cohen-Fix, O. (2000) Sister chromatid separation: We thank Ann Corsi, April Robbins, to establish cohesion between sister falling apart at the seams. Curr. Biol. 10, Ritu Agarwal, Paul Megee, chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. R816–819 Doug Koshland and Tatsuya Hirano for 13, 320–333 stimulating and helpful discussions. 10 Tanaka, T. et al. (1999) Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along Joseph L. Campbell chromosome arms. Cell 98, 847–858 Orna Cohen-Fix* References 11 Megee, P.C. et al. (1999) The centromeric sister The Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular 1 Anderson, D.E. et al. (2002) Condensin and chromatid cohesion site directs Mcd1p binding to cohesin display different arm conformations with adjacent sequences. Mol. Cell 4, 445–450 Biology, NIDDK, NIH 8 Center Drive, characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156, 12 Blat, Y. et al. (1999) Cohesins bind to preferential Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 419–424 sites along yeast chromosome III, with *e-mail: [email protected] Protein Sequence Motif YTH: a new domain in nuclear proteins Peter Stoilov, Ilona Rafalska and Stefan Stamm A novel 100–150-residue domain has been intron sequences by the spliceosome is In addition, the alternative splicing identified in the human splicing factor crucial for gene expression. However, the patterns of the splicing factor SRp20 YT521-B and its Drosophila and yeast sequences of the two splice sites and the and hTra2-β pre-mRNAs are altered homologues. Homology searches show branch point that are recognized by by YT521-B [6]. YT521 does not belong that the domain is typical for the spliceosome components are clearly to any of the known splicing factor eukaryotes and is particularly abundant in insufficient to identify the exons in the families. The only sequence feature plants. It is predicted to adopt a mixed pre-mRNA sequence. Correct recognition that it shares with some of the splicing α-helix–β-sheet fold and to bind to RNA. of exons is achieved by the cooperative factors is an RE/D repeat. Here we We propose the name YTH (for YT521-B action of multiple splicing factors report the identification of a new homology) for the domain. auxiliary to the spliceosome [2]. These domain in splicing factor YT521-B factors bind in a sequence-specific and a number of proteins of unknown Published online: 5 September 2002 manner to the pre-mRNA [3,4] and function that could be involved in recruit the spliceosome components to RNA binding. One of the most prominent features of the splice sites. The nuclear protein eukaryotic genes is their discontinuity. YT521 has been identified in Domain characterization Analysis of the working draft of the two-hybrid screens with splicing During BLAST searches to identify human genome has shown that, on factors [5,6]. It interacts with several YT521-B homologues, a conserved part of average, introns account for 95% of the splicing factors, both in two-hybrid and the protein was identified between pre-mRNA [1]. The precise removal of co-immunoprecipitation assays [5,6]. residues 356 and 499 of the rat YT521-B http://tibs.trends.com 0968-0004/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0968-0004(02)02189-8 496 Research Update TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.27 No.10 October 2002 Fig. 1. Multiple alignment of sequences containing YT homology (YTH) domains. The sequences are denoted with the closely related vertebrate homologues GeneBank identifier of the corresponding nucleotide sequence followed by the species name. The GeneBank identifier of YT521. for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae refers to protein entry in the database. Translations of partial EST sequences are indicated with an asterisk. The sequences were identified using searches of the translated EST and the nonredundant We used SMART [9,10] to search the nucleotide databases at NCBI using rat YT521-B (shown in italic). Wherever available, the conceptual translation SMART and PFAM databases for provided in the database was used for the alignment. If no conceptual translation was provided (i.e. for the EST additional known domains in the sequences), the reading frame identified by the BLAST search was used if it did not contain stop codons or unknown proteins that contain YTH. The search residues. Redundant sequences originating from the same species were omitted. The similar residues that are present in all sequences are shaded (green) using the PAM250 matrix. The identical residues are shaded in yellow. The failed to identify any known domains secondary structure, as predicted by the PHD program, is shown on top. E denotes extended (β-strands) structure and except for three C–C–C–H-type zinc H denotes the predicted α-helices. The multiple sequence alignment (accession number ALIGN_000432) has been finger domains in GI:18397519, an deposited at the European Bioinformatics Institute (ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/embl/align/). A. thaliana predicted protein of unknown function. Therefore, we protein. We therefore performed a The sequences from these searches conclude that the YTH domain defines a PSI-BLAST [7] search with this portion of that aligned to the full length of the query new protein family. the YT521-B protein, using an exclusion and had an E value <10−6 were aligned The putative secondary structure was threshold of 0.005. After four iterations, using CLUSTALW [8] after the determined using the PHD program [11]. multiple proteins from Arabidopsis redundancies had been removed (Fig. 1). The domain is predicted to have a mixed thaliana, Oryza sativa, Homo sapiens, Additional BLAST searches against the αβ-fold, with four α-helices and six Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster, genome databases confirmed that the β-strands. The conservation pattern Plasmodium falciparum and conserved region is present exclusively follows the predicted secondary Saccharomyces cerevisiae where found to in eukaryotic genomes. structure, with three blocks of conserved have similar regions, with E values in the The conserved region appears to sequence separated by loops of variable range 10−11–10−60. Many of these protein define a new domain in these proteins, size. Notable features of the domain are sequences were derived from automated which we termed the YT homology (YTH) the highly conserved aromatic residues gene prediction and were not confirmed domain. The YTH domain is usually located in the β-sheet. by mRNA or EST sequences. To identify located in the middle of the protein Most of the proteins identified in the sequences of existing proteins, we sequence. The domain shows remarkable BLAST searches are of plant origin, with performed BLAST [7] searches with conservation across a wide species 13 distinct sequences coming from a the conserved region against the range, with 14 invariant and 19 single species (A. thaliana). It is unclear translated nonredundant nucleotide highly conserved residues.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protein Structure & Folding
    6 Protein Structure & Folding To understand protein folding In the last chapter we learned that proteins are composed of amino acids Goal as a chemical equilibrium. linked together by peptide bonds. We also learned that the twenty amino acids display a wide range of chemical properties. In this chapter we will see Objectives that how a protein folds is determined by its amino acid sequence and that the three-dimensional shape of a folded protein determines its function by After this chapter, you should be able to: the way it positions these amino acids. Finally, we will see that proteins fold • describe the four levels of protein because doing so minimizes Gibbs free energy and that this minimization structure and the thermodynamic involves both making the most favorable bonds and maximizing disorder. forces that stabilize them. • explain how entropy (S) and enthalpy Proteins exhibit four levels of structure (H) contribute to Gibbs free energy. • use the equation ΔG = ΔH – TΔS The structure of proteins can be broken down into four levels of to determine the dependence of organization. The first is primary structure, the linear sequence of amino the favorability of a reaction on acids in the polypeptide chain. By convention, the primary sequence is temperature. written in order from the amino acid at the N-terminus (by convention • explain the hydrophobic effect and its usually on the left) to the amino acid at the C-terminus. The second level role in protein folding. of protein structure, secondary structure, is the local conformation adopted by stretches of contiguous amino acids.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Glycosylase Exercise - Levels 1 & 2: Answer Key
    Name________________________ StarBiochem DNA Glycosylase Exercise - Levels 1 & 2: Answer Key Background In this exercise, you will explore the structure of a DNA repair protein found in most species, including bacteria. DNA repair proteins move along DNA strands, checking for mistakes or damage. DNA glycosylases, a specific type of DNA repair protein, recognize DNA bases that have been chemically altered and remove them, leaving a site in the DNA without a base. Other proteins then come along to fill in the missing DNA base. Learning objectives We will explore the relationship between a protein’s structure and its function in a human DNA glycosylase called human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (hOGG1). Getting started We will begin this exercise by exploring the structure of hOGG1 using a molecular 3-D viewer called StarBiochem. In this particular structure, the repair protein is bound to a segment of DNA that has been damaged. We will first focus on the structure hOGG1 and then on how this protein interacts with DNA to repair a damaged DNA base. • To begin using StarBiochem, please navigate to: http://mit.edu/star/biochem/. • Click on the Start button Click on the Start button for StarBiochem. • Click Trust when a prompt appears asking if you trust the certificate. • In the top menu, click on Samples à Select from Samples. Within the Amino Acid/Proteins à Protein tab, select “DNA glycosylase hOGG1 w/ DNA – H. sapiens (1EBM)”. “1EBM” is the four character unique ID for this structure. Take a moment to look at the structure from various angles by rotating and zooming on the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteasomes on the Chromosome Cell Research (2017) 27:602-603
    602 Cell Research (2017) 27:602-603. © 2017 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/17 $ 32.00 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT www.nature.com/cr Proteasomes on the chromosome Cell Research (2017) 27:602-603. doi:10.1038/cr.2017.28; published online 7 March 2017 Targeted proteolysis plays an this process, both in mediating homolog ligases, respectively, as RN components important role in the execution and association and in providing crossovers that impact crossover formation [5, 6]. regulation of many cellular events. that tether homologs and ensure their In the first of the two papers, Ahuja et Two recent papers in Science identify accurate segregation. Meiotic recom- al. [7] report that budding yeast pre9∆ novel roles for proteasome-mediated bination is initiated by DNA double- mutants, which lack a nonessential proteolysis in homologous chromo- strand breaks (DSBs) at many sites proteasome subunit, display defects in some pairing, recombination, and along chromosomes, and the multiple meiotic DSB repair, in chromosome segregation during meiosis. interhomolog interactions formed by pairing and synapsis, and in crossover Protein degradation by the 26S pro- DSB repair drive homolog association, formation. Similar defects are seen, teasome drives a variety of processes culminating in the end-to-end homolog but to a lesser extent, in cells treated central to the cell cycle, growth, and dif- synapsis by a protein structure called with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. ferentiation. Proteins are targeted to the the synaptonemal complex (SC) [3]. These defects all can be ascribed to proteasome by covalently ligated chains SC-associated focal protein complexes, a failure to remove nonhomologous of ubiquitin, a small (8.5 kDa) protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Protein Structure Learning Objectives
    Chapter 13 Protein structure Learning objectives Upon completing this material you should be able to: ■ understand the principles of protein primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure; ■use the NCBI tool CN3D to view a protein structure; ■use the NCBI tool VAST to align two structures; ■explain the role of PDB including its purpose, contents, and tools; ■explain the role of structure annotation databases such as SCOP and CATH; and ■describe approaches to modeling the three-dimensional structure of proteins. Outline Overview of protein structure Principles of protein structure Protein Data Bank Protein structure prediction Intrinsically disordered proteins Protein structure and disease Overview: protein structure The three-dimensional structure of a protein determines its capacity to function. Christian Anfinsen and others denatured ribonuclease, observed rapid refolding, and demonstrated that the primary amino acid sequence determines its three-dimensional structure. We can study protein structure to understand problems such as the consequence of disease-causing mutations; the properties of ligand-binding sites; and the functions of homologs. Outline Overview of protein structure Principles of protein structure Protein Data Bank Protein structure prediction Intrinsically disordered proteins Protein structure and disease Protein primary and secondary structure Results from three secondary structure programs are shown, with their consensus. h: alpha helix; c: random coil; e: extended strand Protein tertiary and quaternary structure Quarternary structure: the four subunits of hemoglobin are shown (with an α 2β2 composition and one beta globin chain high- lighted) as well as four noncovalently attached heme groups. The peptide bond; phi and psi angles The peptide bond; phi and psi angles in DeepView Protein secondary structure Protein secondary structure is determined by the amino acid side chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Proteins and Amino Acids Introduction
    Introduction to Proteins and Amino Acids Introduction • Twenty percent of the human body is made up of proteins. Proteins are the large, complex molecules that are critical for normal functioning of cells. • They are essential for the structure, function, and regulation of the body’s tissues and organs. • Proteins are made up of smaller units called amino acids, which are building blocks of proteins. They are attached to one another by peptide bonds forming a long chain of proteins. Amino acid structure and its classification • An amino acid contains both a carboxylic group and an amino group. Amino acids that have an amino group bonded directly to the alpha-carbon are referred to as alpha amino acids. • Every alpha amino acid has a carbon atom, called an alpha carbon, Cα ; bonded to a carboxylic acid, –COOH group; an amino, –NH2 group; a hydrogen atom; and an R group that is unique for every amino acid. Classification of amino acids • There are 20 amino acids. Based on the nature of their ‘R’ group, they are classified based on their polarity as: Classification based on essentiality: Essential amino acids are the amino acids which you need through your diet because your body cannot make them. Whereas non essential amino acids are the amino acids which are not an essential part of your diet because they can be synthesized by your body. Essential Non essential Histidine Alanine Isoleucine Arginine Leucine Aspargine Methionine Aspartate Phenyl alanine Cystine Threonine Glutamic acid Tryptophan Glycine Valine Ornithine Proline Serine Tyrosine Peptide bonds • Amino acids are linked together by ‘amide groups’ called peptide bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Lifeact–F-Actin Complex
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.16.951269; this version posted February 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Structure of the Lifeact–F-actin complex 2 Alexander Belyy1, Felipe Merino1,2, Oleg Sitsel1 and Stefan Raunser1* 3 1Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Str. 11, 44227 Dortmund, 4 Germany 5 2Current address: Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 6 72076, Tübingen, Germany. 7 *Correspondence should be addressed to: [email protected] 8 9 Abstract 10 Lifeact is a short actin-binding peptide that is used to visualize filamentous actin (F-actin) 11 structures in live eukaryotic cells using fluorescence microscopy. However, this popular probe 12 has been shown to alter cellular morphology by affecting the structure of the cytoskeleton. The 13 molecular basis for such artefacts is poorly understood. Here, we determined the high- 14 resolution structure of the Lifeact–F-actin complex using electron cryo-microscopy. The 15 structure reveals that Lifeact interacts with a hydrophobic binding pocket on F-actin and 16 stretches over two adjacent actin subunits, stabilizing the DNase I-binding loop of actin in the 17 closed conformation. Interestingly, the hydrophobic binding site is also used by actin-binding 18 proteins, such as cofilin and myosin and actin-binding toxins, such as TccC3HVR from 19 Photorhabdus luminescens and ExoY from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcharging of Zinc Ion in the Structure of Zinc−Finger Protein Is
    Overcharging of zinc ion in the structure of zinc−finger protein is needed for DNA binding stability Ly H. Nguyen,z Tuyen T. Tran,z Truong Thi Ngoc Lien,x Mai Hong Hanh,z and Toan T. Nguyen∗,z zKey Laboratory for Multiscale Simulations of Complex Systems, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai street, Thanh Xuan district, Hanoi, Vietnam xHanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet street, Bach Khoa, Hai Ba Trung district, Hanoi, Vietnam E-mail: [email protected],[email protected] Running header Zinc−finger overcharging arXiv:1911.10452v2 [q-bio.BM] 22 Feb 2020 1 Abstract Zinc finger structure, where a Zn2+ ion binds to four 4 cysteines or histidines in a tetrahedral structure, is a very common motif of nucleic acid−binding proteins. The corresponding interaction model is present in 3% of the genes in human genome. As a result, zinc−finger has been extremely useful in various therapeutic and research capacities, and in biotechnology. In stable configuration of zinc−finger, the cysteine amino acids are deprotonated and become negatively charged. Thus, the Zn2+ ion is overscreened by four cysteine charges (overcharged). Whether this overcharged config- uration is also stable when such a negatively charged zinc−finger binds to a negatively charged DNA molecule is unknown. We investigated how the deprotonated state of cysteine influences its structure, dynamics, and function in binding to DNA molecules by using an all−atom molecular dynamics simulation up to microsecond range of an androgen receptor protein dimer. Our results showed that the deprotonated state of cysteine residues is essential for mechanical stabilization of the functional, folded con- formation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Function of Large Biological Molecules 5
    The Structure and Function of Large Biological Molecules 5 Figure 5.1 Why is the structure of a protein important for its function? KEY CONCEPTS The Molecules of Life Given the rich complexity of life on Earth, it might surprise you that the most 5.1 Macromolecules are polymers, built from monomers important large molecules found in all living things—from bacteria to elephants— can be sorted into just four main classes: carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic 5.2 Carbohydrates serve as fuel acids. On the molecular scale, members of three of these classes—carbohydrates, and building material proteins, and nucleic acids—are huge and are therefore called macromolecules. 5.3 Lipids are a diverse group of For example, a protein may consist of thousands of atoms that form a molecular hydrophobic molecules colossus with a mass well over 100,000 daltons. Considering the size and complexity 5.4 Proteins include a diversity of of macromolecules, it is noteworthy that biochemists have determined the detailed structures, resulting in a wide structure of so many of them. The image in Figure 5.1 is a molecular model of a range of functions protein called alcohol dehydrogenase, which breaks down alcohol in the body. 5.5 Nucleic acids store, transmit, The architecture of a large biological molecule plays an essential role in its and help express hereditary function. Like water and simple organic molecules, large biological molecules information exhibit unique emergent properties arising from the orderly arrangement of their 5.6 Genomics and proteomics have atoms. In this chapter, we’ll first consider how macromolecules are built.
    [Show full text]
  • Zinc Finger Proteins: Getting a Grip On
    Zinc finger proteins: getting a grip on RNA Raymond S Brown C2H2 (Cys-Cys-His-His motif) zinc finger proteins are members others, such as hZFP100 (C2H2) [11] and tristetraprolin of a large superfamily of nucleic-acid-binding proteins in TTP (CCCH) [12], are involved in histone pre-mRNA eukaryotes. On the basis of NMR and X-ray structures, we processing and the degradation of tumor necrosis factor know that DNA sequence recognition involves a short a helix a mRNA, respectively. In addition, there are reports of bound to the major groove. Exactly how some zinc finger dual RNA/DNA-binding proteins, such as the thyroid proteins bind to double-stranded RNA has been a complete hormone receptor (CCCC) [13] and the trypanosome mystery for over two decades. This has been resolved by the poly-zinc finger PZFP1 pre-mRNA processing protein long-awaited crystal structure of part of the TFIIIA–5S RNA (CCHC) [14]. Whether their interactions with RNA are complex. A comparison can be made with identical fingers in a based on the same mechanisms as protein–DNA binding TFIIIA–DNA structure. Additionally, the NMR structure of is an intriguing structural question that has remained TIS11d bound to an AU-rich element reveals the molecular unanswered until now. details of the interaction between CCCH fingers and single-stranded RNA. Together, these results contrast the What follows is an attempt to expose both similarities different ways that zinc finger proteins bind with high and differences between C2H2 zinc finger protein bind- specificity to their RNA targets. ing to RNA and DNA based on recent X-ray structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Protein Structure Prediction
    Introduction to Protein Structure Prediction BMI/CS 776 www.biostat.wisc.edu/bmi776/ Colin Dewey [email protected] Spring 2012 The Protein Folding Problem • we know that the function of a protein is determined in large part by its 3D shape (fold, conformation) • can we predict the 3D shape of a protein given only its amino-acid sequence? Protein Architecture • proteins are polymers consisting of amino acids linked by peptide bonds • each amino acid consists of – a central carbon atom (alpha-carbon) – an amino group, NH2 – a carboxyl group, COOH – a side chain • differences in side chains distinguish different amino acids Amino Acids and Peptide Bonds amino side carboxyl group chain group α carbon (common reference point for coordinates of a structure) Amino Acid Side Chains side chains vary in – shape – size – charge – polarity What Determines Conformation? • in general, the amino-acid sequence of a protein determines the 3D shape of a protein [Anfinsen et al., 1950s] • but some qualifications – all proteins can be denatured – some proteins are inherently disordered (i.e. lack a regular structure) – some proteins get folding help from chaperones – there are various mechanisms through which the conformation of a protein can be changed in vivo – post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation – prions – etc. What Determines Conformation? • Which physical properties of the protein determine its fold? – rigidity of the protein backbone – interactions among amino acids, including • electrostatic interactions • van der Waals
    [Show full text]
  • On the Benefits of Disorder
    Issue 238, July 2021 www.proteinspotlight.org on the benefits of disorder Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen Like rules, paradigms are liable to be broken. By the beginning of this century, the 'one gene - one protein' paradigm had begun to shift as scientists grasped the realm of mRNA splicing and post- translational modifications. Today, we know that one gene may give rise to several amino-acid sequences which can be further modified on their surface. Each of these events produces a protein with a different function. Another paradigm is the 'structure - function' paradigm, where a protein's function is defined by the fold it adopts in space, itself dictated by the underlying amino-acid sequence. However, early on in 2000, scientists were observing regions on a protein, which seem to adopt no particular 3D conformation at all but, instead, several conformations depending on the environment. These peculiar regions have since been termed 'disordered regions'. As an illustration, disordered regions located in a protein known as YTHDF are involved in the formation of stress granules when a cell is under some kind of pressure. true purpose of stress granules remains to be understood, biologists believe they provide a means of protecting mRNA from harm brought about by heat-shock or oxidative stress for instance. However, they may also form simply to store mRNA, or perhaps to degrade it or even re- initiate it. What exactly is mRNA? In a nutshell, mRNA holds the information needed to synthesise a protein sequence. It is a copy of a gene, which is a stretch of DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteasome Biology: Chemistry and Bioengineering Insights
    polymers Review Proteasome Biology: Chemistry and Bioengineering Insights Lucia Raˇcková * and Erika Csekes Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 28 September 2020; Accepted: 23 November 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: Proteasomal degradation provides the crucial machinery for maintaining cellular proteostasis. The biological origins of modulation or impairment of the function of proteasomal complexes may include changes in gene expression of their subunits, ubiquitin mutation, or indirect mechanisms arising from the overall impairment of proteostasis. However, changes in the physico-chemical characteristics of the cellular environment might also meaningfully contribute to altered performance. This review summarizes the effects of physicochemical factors in the cell, such as pH, temperature fluctuations, and reactions with the products of oxidative metabolism, on the function of the proteasome. Furthermore, evidence of the direct interaction of proteasomal complexes with protein aggregates is compared against the knowledge obtained from immobilization biotechnologies. In this regard, factors such as the structures of the natural polymeric scaffolds in the cells, their content of reactive groups or the sequestration of metal ions, and processes at the interface, are discussed here with regard to their
    [Show full text]