DOCSLIB.ORG

Activation of Intestinal Tuft Cell-Expressed Sucnr1 Triggers Type 2 Immunity in the Mouse Small Intestine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Activation of Intestinal Tuft Cell-Expressed Sucnr1 Triggers Type 2 Immunity in the Mouse Small Intestine Activation of intestinal tuft cell-expressed Sucnr1 triggers type 2 immunity in the mouse small intestine Weiwei Leia,1, Wenwen Rena,1, Makoto Ohmotoa, Joseph F. Urban Jr.b, Ichiro Matsumotoa, Robert F. Margolskeea, and Peihua Jianga,2 aMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and bDiet, Genomics and Immunology Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705 Edited by Robert J. Lefkowitz, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and approved April 19, 2018 (received for review November 28, 2017) The hallmark features of type 2 mucosal immunity include in- Expulsion of the intestinal worm parasite Nippostrongylus brasi- − − testinal tuft and goblet cell expansion initiated by tuft cell liensis from the gut is significantly delayed in Pou2f3 / mice activation. How infectious agents that induce type 2 mucosal compared with wild-type mice (8). The current model suggests tuft immunity are detected by tuft cells is unknown. Published micro- cells detect parasitic infection via taste-signaling elements and se- array analysis suggested that succinate receptor 1 (Sucnr1) is spe- crete the proinflammatory cytokine IL-25, which subsequently cifically expressed in tuft cells. Thus, we hypothesized that the triggers mucosal type 2 responses via IL-13–producing ILC2s and succinate–Sucnr1 axis may be utilized by tuft cells to detect certain IL-13 receptor alpha-expressing intestinal epithelial progenitor cells infectious agents. Here we confirmed that Sucnr1 is specifically (6–8, 17, 18). Given the importance of gustducin and Trpm5 for expressed in intestinal tuft cells but not in other types of intestinal parasite type 2 immunity, which are downstream transduction epithelial cells, and demonstrated that dietary succinate induces elements for G protein-coupled taste receptors (GPCRs) (19, tuft and goblet cell hyperplasia via Sucnr1 and the tuft cell- 20), we reasoned that activation of tuft cell-expressed GPCRs expressed chemosensory signaling elements gustducin and Trpm5. – −/− may cascade on the gustducin Trpm5 pathway and trigger type Conventional mice with a genetic Sucnr1 deficiency (Sucnr1 ) 2 immunity, resembling the response to parasitic helminth or MEDICAL SCIENCES showed diminished immune responses to treatment with polyeth- protozoan infections. ylene glycol and streptomycin, which are known to enhance Previous microarray analysis of tuft cells suggested that succi- microbiota-derived succinate, but responded normally to inocula- nate receptor 1 (Sucnr1), a GPCR with succinate as its cognate tion with the parasitic worm Nippostrongylus brasiliensis that also agonist (21), is expressed in tuft cells (11). As a metabolite of the produces succinate. Thus, Sucnr1 is required for microbiota-induced Krebs cycle and microbial propionate synthesis, succinate is known butnotforageneralizedworm-inducedtype2immunity. to be secreted by certain parasites, bacteria, and inflamed tis- sues in pathological conditions (22–29). Thus, we hypothesized Sucnr1 | type 2 immunity | tuft cells | Trpm5 | gustducin that the succinate–Sucnr1 axis is utilized by tuft cells to detect infectious agents. he intestinal epithelium comprises mature cells of two major lineages: absorptive enterocytes and secretory cells (1). Most T Significance mature differentiated cells in the intestinal epithelium are enterocytes; secretory cells constitute only a minor fraction. Se- cretory cells belong to four different classes: enteroendocrine Tuft cells in the intestine are known to act as sentinels for in- cells, goblet cells, Paneth cells, and tuft cells (also known as fectious agents [e.g., helminths (worms) and bacterial micro- brush cells) (1). Enteroendocrine cells function as hormone- biota] and express taste-signaling elements. In this work, the G protein-coupled receptor Sucnr1 was shown to be expressed secreting cells in response to macronutrients, goblet cells pro- specifically in tuft cells but not in other intestinal epithelial duce a protective mucus layer, and Paneth cells secrete niche cells. Dietary succinate and perturbations in the microbiota factors to maintain intestinal stem cell homeostasis and also activate tuft cells, and subsequently type 2 immunity, via tuft produce antimicrobial peptides (1). Despite being discovered – cell-expressed Sucnr1. Modulating this pathway using dietary decades ago (2 5), the function of tuft cells in the small intestine succinate or specific Sucnr1 agonists may be a strategy for was only recently uncovered: They mediate host defense against fighting bacterial and parasitic infections or other type 2 immune- parasitic infection or other pathogens by regulating an intestinal related metabolic disorders such as obesity. type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2)–epithelial response circuit, and hence are involved in immune function (6–8). Author contributions: W.L., R.F.M., and P.J. designed research; W.L., W.R., and M.O. per- Tuft cells express a number of taste-signaling elements, in- formed research; W.L., W.R., M.O., J.F.U., I.M., R.F.M., and P.J. contributed new reagents/ cluding transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M analytic tools; W.L., W.R., M.O., J.F.U., I.M., and P.J. analyzed data; and W.L. and P.J. wrote member 5 (Trpm5), gustducin, and phospholipase β2(Plcβ2) (7, the paper. 9–13). These signaling elements play critical roles in mediating the Conflict of interest statement: W.L. and P.J. have filed a patent application related to the responses of tuft cells to parasitic infections (7). A hallmark fea- effect of succinate on type 2 immunity. ture of such infection is tuft and goblet cell hyperplasia (6–8, 14, This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. 15). In wild-type mice, infections by helminth parasites or proto- Published under the PNAS license. zoans can induce tuft and goblet cell hyperplasia (6–8). In mice Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the National lacking gustducin or Trpm5, these responses are not observed Center for Biotechnology Information (accession no. SRP134009). (7). The transcription factor Pou2f3 is required for develop- 1W.L. and W.R. contributed equally to this work. ment of type II taste cells as well as tuft cells in the gut (8, 16). 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. Mice deficient in Pou2f3, and therefore lacking tuft cells, can- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. not mount a tuft cell-mediated type 2 immune response toward 1073/pnas.1720758115/-/DCSupplemental. − − − − infecting pathogens, similar to Trpm5 / and gustducin / mice (8). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1720758115 PNAS Latest Articles | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Results to activate mucosal type 2 immunity, resulting in tuft and goblet The Succinate Receptor Sucnr1 Is Specifically Expressed in Intestinal cell expansion, goblet cell enlargement (production of mucus), – Tuft Cells. We began to search for the putative tuft cell-expressed and an increase in IL-13 expressing ILC2s. Dietary succinate receptor(s) responsible for detecting infectious agents by mining (100 mM) was added to the drinking water of wild-type mice for the microarray data of intestinal tuft cells (11). The succinate 7 d, a time consistent with the turnover rate of gut epithelial cells (∼5 d) (31) and the peak of tuft cell hyperplasia in response to receptor Sucnr1 (also referred to as Gpr91) is expressed in tuft ∼ cells as a GPCR. To validate the expression of Sucnr1 in intestinal parasitic infection (day 7 of infection) (6). Mice drank normally tuft cells, Trpm5-GFP–positive cells [the expression of green (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) and had no apparent changes in body fluorescent protein (GFP) is driven by the Trpm5 promoter, and weight or behavior after consuming succinate. Immunostaining GFP is used as a surrogate marker for tuft cells] were isolated by was performed with the antibody against the tuft cell marker fluorescence-activated cell sorting (7, 11) (Fig. 1A), and quanti- Dclk1 to determine if feeding succinate induced tuft cell hyper- tative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using primer sets for plasia (32). There was a significant increase in the number of tuft established tuft cell markers as well as a Sucnr1 primer set (Fig. cells in the small intestine of mice drinking water supplemented 1B). Nontuft intestinal epithelial cells (GFP-negative cells) were with succinate compared with plain water (Fig. 2 A and B). Par- asitic helminth infections lead to tuft cell as well as goblet cell used as control. Sucnr1 and other established tuft cell markers – [e.g., Dclk1, Gnat3 (encoding gustducin), Il25, Plcb2, Trpm5]were hyperplasia (6 8). To determine if succinate treatment, like par- robustly expressed in tuft cells compared with nontuft intestinal asitic helminth infection, also impacts goblet cell homeostasis, Alcian blue staining of the intestine of succinate-treated mice was epithelial cells. To directly visualize the expression of Sucnr1 in used to detect goblet cells. As expected, the number and en- tuft cells and determine if Sucnr1 is found in other intestinal ep- largement of goblet cells, features of a type 2 response, signifi- ithelial cells, we performed in situ hybridization of the jejunum cantly increased after succinate treatment (Fig. 2 C–E and SI tissue of wild-type mice using a Sucnr1 RNA probe (Fig. 1C). A Appendix,Fig.S2A). To further validate our immunostaining re- few cells in the jejunum tissue of wild-type mice were stained sults, we performed qPCR analyses of the jejunum of mice treated positively with the Sucnr1 probe, but none were detected in mice with succinate using primers for intestinal epithelial cell markers. deficient for Pou2f3, which results in the specific absence of tuft qPCR data revealed a significant increase in the expression of cells in the intestinal epithelium without affecting other types of genes encoding tuft cell markers (e.g., Sucnr1, Dclk1, Gnat3, intestinal epithelial cells (Fig. 1C) (8). Together, these data show Il25, Plcb2, Trpm5)(6–8) (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tuft-Cell-Derived Leukotrienes Drive Rapid Anti-Helminth Immunity in the Small Intestine but Are Dispensable for Anti-Protist Immunity
    Article Tuft-Cell-Derived Leukotrienes Drive Rapid Anti- helminth Immunity in the Small Intestine but Are Dispensable for Anti-protist Immunity Graphical Abstract Authors John W. McGinty, Hung-An Ting, Tyler E. Billipp, ..., Hong-Erh Liang, Ichiro Matsumoto, Jakob von Moltke Correspondence [email protected] In Brief Tuft cells regulate type 2 immunity in the small intestine by secreting the cytokine IL-25. McGinty et al. identify cysteinyl leukotriene production as an additional tuft cell effector function. Tuft-cell- derived leukotrienes drive anti-helminth immunity in the intestine but are dispensable for the response induced by tritrichomonad protists. Highlights d Cysteinyl leukotrienes activate intestinal ILC2s d Cysteinyl leukotrienes drive rapid anti-helminth type 2 immune responses d Tuft cells are the source of cysteinyl leukotrienes during helminth infection d Tuft-cell-derived leukotrienes are not required for the anti- protist response McGinty et al., 2020, Immunity 52, 528–541 March 17, 2020 ª 2020 Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.005 Immunity Article Tuft-Cell-Derived Leukotrienes Drive Rapid Anti-helminth Immunity in the Small Intestine but Are Dispensable for Anti-protist Immunity John W. McGinty,1 Hung-An Ting,1 Tyler E. Billipp,1 Marija S. Nadjsombati,1 Danish M. Khan,1 Nora A. Barrett,2 Hong-Erh Liang,3,4 Ichiro Matsumoto,5 and Jakob von Moltke1,6,* 1Department of Immunology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA 2Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Jeff
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed Under 23 (B) Or 203 (C) fi M M Male Cko Mice, and Largely Unaffected Magni Cation; Scale Bars, 500 M (B) and 50 M (C)
    BRIEF COMMUNICATION www.jasn.org Renal Fanconi Syndrome and Hypophosphatemic Rickets in the Absence of Xenotropic and Polytropic Retroviral Receptor in the Nephron Camille Ansermet,* Matthias B. Moor,* Gabriel Centeno,* Muriel Auberson,* † † ‡ Dorothy Zhang Hu, Roland Baron, Svetlana Nikolaeva,* Barbara Haenzi,* | Natalya Katanaeva,* Ivan Gautschi,* Vladimir Katanaev,*§ Samuel Rotman, Robert Koesters,¶ †† Laurent Schild,* Sylvain Pradervand,** Olivier Bonny,* and Dmitri Firsov* BRIEF COMMUNICATION *Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and **Genomic Technologies Facility, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; †Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg, Russia; §School of Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia; |Services of Pathology and ††Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; and ¶Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France ABSTRACT Tight control of extracellular and intracellular inorganic phosphate (Pi) levels is crit- leaves.4 Most recently, Legati et al. have ical to most biochemical and physiologic processes. Urinary Pi is freely filtered at the shown an association between genetic kidney glomerulus and is reabsorbed in the renal tubule by the action of the apical polymorphisms in Xpr1 and primary fa- sodium-dependent phosphate transporters, NaPi-IIa/NaPi-IIc/Pit2. However, the milial brain calcification disorder.5 How- molecular identity of the protein(s) participating in the basolateral Pi efflux remains ever, the role of XPR1 in the maintenance unknown. Evidence has suggested that xenotropic and polytropic retroviral recep- of Pi homeostasis remains unknown. Here, tor 1 (XPR1) might be involved in this process. Here, we show that conditional in- we addressed this issue in mice deficient for activation of Xpr1 in the renal tubule in mice resulted in impaired renal Pi Xpr1 in the nephron.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Differentiation Is Disrupted by MYO5B Loss Through Wnt/Notch Imbalance
    Cell differentiation is disrupted by MYO5B loss through Wnt/Notch imbalance Izumi Kaji, … , Masahiko Watanabe, James R. Goldenring JCI Insight. 2021;6(16):e150416. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.150416. Research Article Gastroenterology Functional loss of myosin Vb (MYO5B) induces a variety of deficits in intestinal epithelial cell function and causes a congenital diarrheal disorder, microvillus inclusion disease (MVID). The impact of MYO5B loss on differentiated cell lineage choice has not been investigated. We quantified the populations of differentiated epithelial cells in tamoxifen- induced, epithelial cell–specific MYO5B-knockout (VilCreERT2 Myo5bfl/fl) mice utilizing digital image analysis. Consistent with our RNA-sequencing data, MYO5B loss induced a reduction in tuft cells in vivo and in organoid cultures. Paneth cells were significantly increased by MYO5B deficiency along with expansion of the progenitor cell zone. We further investigated the effect of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) signaling on epithelial cell differentiation. Intraperitoneal LPA significantly increased tuft cell populations in both control and MYO5B-knockout mice. Transcripts for Wnt ligands were significantly downregulated by MYO5B loss in intestinal epithelial cells, whereas Notch signaling molecules were unchanged. Additionally, treatment with the Notch inhibitor dibenzazepine (DBZ) restored the populations of secretory cells, suggesting that the Notch pathway is maintained in MYO5B-deficient intestine. MYO5B loss likely impairs progenitor cell differentiation in the small intestine in vivo and in vitro, partially mediated by Wnt/Notch imbalance. Notch inhibition and/or LPA treatment may represent an effective therapeutic approach for treatment of MVID. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/150416/pdf RESEARCH ARTICLE Cell differentiation is disrupted by MYO5B loss through Wnt/Notch imbalance Izumi Kaji,1,2 Joseph T.
    [Show full text]
  • Receptor Structure-Based Discovery of Non-Metabolite Agonists for the Succinate Receptor GPR91
    Receptor structure-based discovery of non-metabolite agonists for the succinate receptor GPR91 Trauelsen, Mette; Rexen Ulven, Elisabeth; Hjorth, Siv A; Brvar, Matjaz; Monaco, Claudia; Frimurer, Thomas M; Schwartz, Thue W Published in: Molecular Metabolism DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.09.005 Publication date: 2017 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Trauelsen, M., Rexen Ulven, E., Hjorth, S. A., Brvar, M., Monaco, C., Frimurer, T. M., & Schwartz, T. W. (2017). Receptor structure-based discovery of non-metabolite agonists for the succinate receptor GPR91. Molecular Metabolism, 6(12), 1585-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2017.09.005 Download date: 08. apr.. 2020 Original Article Receptor structure-based discovery of non-metabolite agonists for the succinate receptor GPR91 Mette Trauelsen 1, Elisabeth Rexen Ulven 3, Siv A. Hjorth 2, Matjaz Brvar 3, Claudia Monaco 4, Thomas M. Frimurer 1,*, Thue W. Schwartz 1,2,* ABSTRACT Objective: Besides functioning as an intracellular metabolite, succinate acts as a stress-induced extracellular signal through activation of GPR91 (SUCNR1) for which we lack suitable pharmacological tools. Methods and results: Here we first determined that the cis conformation of the succinate backbone is preferred and that certain backbone modifications are allowed for GPR91 activation. Through receptor modeling over the X-ray structure of the closely related P2Y1 receptor, we discovered that the binding pocket is partly occupied by a segment of an extracellular loop and that succinate therefore binds in a very different mode than generally believed.
    [Show full text]
  • Succinate Receptors in the Kidney
    BRIEF REVIEW www.jasn.org Succinate Receptors in the Kidney Peter M.T. Deen and Joris H. Robben Department of Physiology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The G protein–coupled succinate and ␣-ketoglutarate receptors are closely related to nyl-CoA synthetase and subsequently the family of P2Y purinoreceptors. Although the ␣-ketoglutarate receptor is almost converted by succinate dehydrogenase exclusively expressed in the kidney, its function is unknown. In contrast, the succinate to generate fumarate. Because the suc- receptor, SUCRN1, is expressed in a variety of tissues, including blood cells, adipose cinate dehydrogenase complex is part of the tissue, liver, retina, and the kidney. Recent evidence suggests SUCRN1 and its succi- electron transport chain in the mitochon- nate ligand are novel detectors of local stress, including ischemia, hypoxia, toxicity, drial membrane (complex II; Figure 2), its and hyperglycemia. Local levels of succinate in the kidney also activate the renin- activity indirectly depends on the avail- angiotensin system and together with SUCRN1 may play a key role in the develop- ability of oxygen. As such, in situations ment of hypertension and the complications of diabetes mellitus, metabolic disease, when oxygen tension is low, succinate and liver damage. This makes the succinate receptor a promising drug target to accumulates because of low activity of counteract an expanding number of interrelated disorders. succinate dehydrogenase or other en- zymes in the electron transport chain J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 1416–1422, 2011. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050481 that affect its activity.5–7 Low oxygen states, such as ischemia8 or exercise9 also increase circulating levels of succinate.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 27 May 2020
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.07.438755; this version posted April 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: Cells of the human intestinal tract mapped across space and time Elmentaite R1, Kumasaka N1, King HW2, Roberts K1, Dabrowska M1, Pritchard S1, Bolt L1, Vieira SF1, Mamanova L1, Huang N1, Goh Kai’En I3, Stephenson E3, Engelbert J3, Botting RA3, Fleming A1,4, Dann E1, Lisgo SN3, Katan M7, Leonard S1, Oliver TRW1,8, Hook CE8, Nayak K10, Perrone F10, Campos LS1, Dominguez-Conde C1, Polanski K1, Van Dongen S1, Patel M1, Morgan MD5,6, Marioni JC1,5,6, Bayraktar OA1, Meyer KB1, Zilbauer M9,10,11, Uhlig H12,13,14, Clatworthy MR1,4, Mahbubani KT15, Saeb Parsy K15, Haniffa M1,3, James KR1* & Teichmann SA1,16* Affiliations: 1. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. 2. Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK 3. Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. 4. Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK 5. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. 6. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 7. Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London WC1E 6BT, UK 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations (ETD) College of Graduate Health Sciences 12-2013 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations Part of the Medical Cell Biology Commons, and the Medical Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bogard, Amy Sue , "Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells" (2013). Theses and Dissertations (ETD). Paper 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Graduate Health Sciences at UTHSC Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (ETD) by an authorized administrator of UTHSC Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Document Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program Biomedical Sciences Track Molecular Therapeutics and Cell Signaling Research Advisor Rennolds Ostrom, Ph.D. Committee Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. Edwards Park, Ph.D. Steven Tavalin, Ph.D. Christopher Waters, Ph.D. DOI 10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029 Comments Six month embargo expired June 2014 This dissertation is available at UTHSC Digital Commons: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations/330 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells A Dissertation Presented for The Graduate Studies Council The University of Tennessee Health Science Center In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy From The University of Tennessee By Amy Sue Bogard December 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Amy Sue Bogard.
    [Show full text]
  • Granzyme a in Human Platelets Regulates the Synthesis of Proinflammatory Cytokines by Monocytes in Aging
    Granzyme A in Human Platelets Regulates the Synthesis of Proinflammatory Cytokines by Monocytes in Aging This information is current as Robert A. Campbell, Zechariah Franks, Anish Bhatnagar, of September 25, 2021. Jesse W. Rowley, Bhanu K. Manne, Mark A. Supiano, Hansjorg Schwertz, Andrew S. Weyrich and Matthew T. Rondina J Immunol 2018; 200:295-304; Prepublished online 22 November 2017; Downloaded from doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700885 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/200/1/295 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2017/11/22/jimmunol.170088 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Material 5.DCSupplemental References This article cites 47 articles, 12 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/200/1/295.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. by guest on September 25, 2021 • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2017 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Granzyme A in Human Platelets Regulates the Synthesis of Proinflammatory Cytokines by Monocytes in Aging Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Identification and Probe Development for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    TARGET IDENTIFICATION AND PROBE DEVELOPMENT FOR PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS Identifizierung von Zielstrukturen und Sondenentwicklung für pankreatische neuroendokrine Tumore Von der Fakultät Energie‐, Verfahrens‐ und Biotechnik der Universität Stuttgart zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigte Abhandlung vorgelegt von Jan Lennart Körner aus Warstein Hauptberichter: Prof. Dr. Roland Kontermann Nebenberichter: Prof. Dr. Christina Wege Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19.02.2015 Institut für Zellbiologie und Immunologie Universität Stuttgart 2015 1 INDEX II Table of Contents 1. Glossary .............................................................................................................................. V 2. Abstract ............................................................................................................................ VII 2.1. Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................ VIII 3. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 3.1. Rationale .................................................................................................................................. 1 3.2. G Protein‐Coupled Receptors .................................................................................................. 1 3.3. GPCR Signal Transduction .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]