SPAFA Digest, 1989, Vol 10, No 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SPAFA Digest, 1989, Vol 10, No 2 8 ing lotus bearing Brahma, the creator STOLEN ART OBJECTS of the world in Hinduism. He is flanked by two flying angels in the altitude of adoration. RETURNED TO THAILAND On both sides of Vishnu are scroll and leaf motifs. Comparing to Khmer art in Cambodia, this lintel by M.C. Subhadradis Diskul should date back to about the middle or late 12th century A.D. It was originally at the sanctuary called Prang Ku Suan Taeng, in Putthaisong I,Three of the many art objects Khmer style from Cambodia, depicts District, Buriram Province, North- stolen from Thailand were retreived. the reclining Vishnu, one of the eastern Thailand. The following relates how the Thai greatest Hindu gods. The god is The lintel was stolen from the people and their Government worked shown lying on a naga (snake), which sanctuary on 15 April 1964. Later, it for the return of these invaluable has only one head, upon a dragon appeared in the collection of Mr. cultural heritage. (an aquatic animal showing Chinese Avery Brundage, an American millio- origin). naire. The writer saw the picture of LOPBURI PERIOD He has four arms: the upper the stolen lintel in a catalogue. The STONE LINTEL right supporting his head; the upper catalogue, sponsored by the Asia The first stolen art object re- left holding (he stem of a lotus; and Foundation, was published to illustrate turned to (he Government of Thai- the lower left holding a conch (?). the eastern art collection of Mr. Avery land is a stone lintel from the Lopburi His two consorts are seated behind Brundage, donated to the De Young Period. The lintel, influenced by the his legs. On (op of Vishnu is a bloom- Museum in San Francisco. 9 Left : The Reclining Vishnu Lintel, scroll designs and the figure of a large to various institutions in that country. taken in situ, before it disappeared bird holding an elephant in its beak. After the lecture at the Art from prasat Phanom Rung. The broken piece on the left Institute of Chicago, the writer was side of the lintel represents the same taken around the Institute to look at After quite a long negotiation, motifs as on the right. In addition their oriental collection. While brows- this lintel was kindly returned to the however a standing garuda (king of ing, he immediately recognized the Fine Arts Department of Thailand birds) is represented as holding two right fragment of the stolen Vishnu on 24 July 1970. This was the day nagas (king of snakes) above a kala's Lintel. So, after the lintel disappeared when Mr. Avery Brundage presided (monster) face. Two parrots, one on from the Phanom Rung Sanctuary it over the First Asean Games held in each side of an extending floral pen- was displayed at the Art Institute. Bangkok.The Lopburi Period stone dant underneath, and a mother mon- The writer learned from one of lintel is now being displayed in the key nurturing her child arc also shown. the officials of the Institute that the Bangkok National Museum. THE RECLINING VISHNU LINTEL The case of the second art object is much more complicated. It took more time to retrieve than the first one. The art object is a stone lintel from Prasat Phanom Rung in Nang Rong District, Buriram Province, Northeastern Thailand. Stone lintel representing reclining Vishnu at Prang Ku Suan Taeng, Buriram The Prasat Phanom Rung Sanc- Province, Northeastern Thailand. Middle or late 12th century A.D. Returned by tuary was registered as one of the Mr. Avery Brundage on 24 July 1970. national monuments of Thailand on 8 March 1935. The stolen lintel from this sanctuary represents the reclining These two fragments of the Vishnu Lintel was loaned from Mr. Vishnu, on the five-headed naga upon same lintel were photographed twice James W. Alsdorf. He was, during a dragon. The lintel had fallen from in situ in 1932 and 1960 and published that period, the Chairman of the above the doorway on the eastern in a book form in 1967. The date of Institute's Board of Trustees. side of the sanctuary and broken into the lintel should be about the first When the writer returned to two pieces. half of the 12th century A.D. Thailand, he wrote a letter to the A large part, on the right side In about the year I960 or 1961 Director-General of the Thai Fine of the lintel, not only represents the these two fragments disappeared Arts Department. That was in Febru- reclining Vishnu upon the naga and from the sanctuary. On 13 August ary 1973. In his letter he wrote about dragon but also a blooming lotus in 1965, the Fine Arts Department of his discovery and suggested that the middle, supporting Brahma. One Thailand was able to retrieve the left Thailand ask for the return of the consort is shown tending the legs of fragment of the lintel from an antique lintel since there were strong evidences Vishnu. shop in Bangkok. But the where- pointing to the theft of the lintel and Vishnu has four arms. The two abouts of the right fragment remain- that it was smuggled out of Thailand. on the right are holding a discus and ed unknown. Acting upon his suggestion, the supporting his head, while the two on In 1972, a louring exhibition Thai Fine Arts Department wrote to the left arc holding a club and prob- of Thai art was held, for the second the Art Institute of Chicago asking ably holding a conch above a lotus. time, in the United Slates of America. for the return of the lintel. The Art On the right side of the lintel are The writer was invited to give lectures Institute, however, replied that the 10 linlel belonged to Mr. Alsdorf. The Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Educa- in southern India and later on appear- lintel, according to them, was only tion and the Department of Fine Arts ed in a museum in the United States. loaned by the Insitute from him. in Thailand. Clearly interested, the writer Again, the Thai Fine Arts Department Meanwhile the restoration of asked the curator how the statue wrote a letter, this time, to Mr. Alsdorf. the Phanom Rung Temple began, was successfully returned to India. But no reply. further to the Anastylosis Method. "American public pressure, that is There is a mystery here. Mr. In 1987, 15 years after the first very important", came the reply. Alsdorf, further to the letters of the discovery of the Phanom Rung lintel When the writer reached Thai- Thai Fine Arts Department, created at the Art Institute of Chicago, the land from India, on 29 October 1987, the Alsdorf Foundation. Then he writer went to New Delhi, India. he wrote a letter to the Director- donated all his collection to the Foun- There he gave a lecture on an ancient General of the Thai Fine Arts Depart- dation. town at Sitep in Petchaburi Province, ment. In his letter he suggested that On the other hand, the Founda- Northern-Central Thailand. since the restoration of Prasat Pha- tion, after the request for the lintel In that lecture he showed many nom Rung was nearly completed, in 1988, claimed that they have pre- slides on antiquities found at Sitep another attempt should be made for viously sent two letters to the Thai which had been smuggled out of the return of the lintel. Government, asking for evidences on Thailand. The smuggled antiquities At the same time, the Director- the theft of the lintel. Moreover, they were, at the same time, exhibited in General should make himself available claimed the Government of Thailand one museum in the United States. for interviews, not only with the Thai never responded to their letters. After the lecture the curator of press but also with the foreign mass Needless to say, thorough sear- the National Museum in New Delhi media, especially those in the United ches were thereafter carried out, by asked the writer whether or not he States. These mass media should the Government of Thailand, Tor the knew of the bronze statue of the include such well-known papers as Alsdorf Foundation letters. But none dancing Siva retrieved by India from the Times Weekly, Newsweek and the were found at the Thai Embassy in a museum in the United States. The New York Times in order to be able Washington D.C., the Ministry of statue had been stolen from a temple to utilize American public pressure. The implementation of the writer's suggestion aroused a lot of public awareness, especially among the Thai people in Thailand and also in Chicago. At the same time the Thai Government, through the Ministry of Education, tried contacting the Art Institute of Chicago again. The Art Institute, agreed to return the lintel, provided that an art object of equal value is given as an exchange. They used the 1970 Unesco Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Own- ership of Cultural Property as an obstacle to the return of the lintel without any compensation. Stone lintel representing the Reclining Vishnu at Prasat Phanom Rung, Buriram, Meanwhile, protests held by Northeastern Thailand (first half of the 12th century A.D.). Returned from the Thais living in Chicago progressed Art Institute of Chicago on 10th November 1988. in front of the Art Institute. A lot 11 of Americans joined the Thais in their cause. In fact, an American senator from Illinois even wrote a letter, requesting the President of the Board of the Art Institute of Chicago to voluntarily "give up this priceless Thai treasure to the Thai people to whom it belongs".
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support Program
    Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 54177-001 June 2020 Proposed Countercyclical Support Facility Loans Kingdom of Thailand: COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support Program Distribution of this document is restricted until it has been approved by the Board of Directors. Following such approval, ADB will disclose the document to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy after excluding information that is subject to exceptions to disclosure set forth in the policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 7 June 2020) Currency unit – baht (B) B1.00 = $0.03173 $1.00 = B31.50 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ASEAN – Association of Southeast Asian Nations BOT – Bank of Thailand CARES – COVID-19 Active Response and Expenditure Support CLMV – Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, and Viet Nam COVID-19 – coronavirus disease CPS – country partnership strategy GDP – gross domestic product GMS – Greater Mekong Subregion IMF – International Monetary Fund MOF – Ministry of Finance MOPH – Ministry of Public Health SMEs – small and medium-sized enterprises WHO – World Health Organization NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Thailand and its agencies ends on 30 September. "FY" before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2020 ends on 30 September 2020. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars. Vice-President Ahmed M. Saeed, Operations 2 Director General Ramesh Subramaniam, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Directors Jose Antonio R. Tan III, Public Management, Financial Sector and Trade Division (SEPF), SERD Ayako Inagaki, Human and Social Development Division (SEHS), SERD Hideaki Iwasaki, Thailand Resident Mission (TRM), SERD Team leaders Duong T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government of Thailand's National Review
    1 The Government of Thailand’s National Review Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (1995) and the outcomes of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly (2000) in the context of the twentieth anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women and the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action 2015 October 2014 2 Section One: Overview analysis of achievements and challenges since 1995 Thailand as a member of the global community has ratified numbers of international agreements on women and the promotion of gender equality, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), and endorsed Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (BFPA) and the Millennium Development Goal (MDGs). These 3 agreements are definite, related, and corresponding to Thailand’s policies. The Thai government has attached great importance to the social equality and to mainstream gender perspectives in the national policy, giving priority to the promotion of gender equality, women’s role in politics and administration at all level, and the respect for human dignity. Major achievements in promoting gender equality and empowering women in Thailand since the adoption of the Beijing Platform for Action in 1995 can be identified as follows: National policy on gender equality and women empowerment Over the past few decades Thailand has implemented a total of nine short and long term women’s development plans. Thailand has developed long-term (20-year) and, on a regular basis, short-term (5-year) Women’s Development Plans , the national policy and guidelines on gender equality and the empowerment of women, as part of, and a key to integrate women and gender from the global, regional and national commitments into the mainstream of the National Economic and Social Development Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Sacred Sites in Bangkok Temple As an Auspicious Activity That Grants Them Happiness and Good Luck
    The 9 Sacred Sites Buddhists in Thailand pay homage at the temple or ‘wat’ as they believe it is a way to make merit. They consider paying homage to the principal Buddha image or to the main Chedi of the 9 Sacred Sites in Bangkok temple as an auspicious activity that grants them happiness and good luck. The number nine is considered auspicious because it is pronounced as ‘kao,’ similar to the word meaning ‘to progress’ or ‘to step forward.’ Therefore it is believed that a visit to nine sacred temples in one day gives the worshippers prosperity and good luck. The nine sacred temples in Bangkok are of significant value as they are royal temples and convenient for worshippers as they are located close to each other in the heart of Bangkok. Wat Saket Printed in Thailand by Promotional Material Production Division, Marketing Services Department, Tourism Authority of Thailand for free distribution. www.tourismthailand.org E/JUL 2017 The contents of this publication are subject to change without notice. The 9 Sacred Sites Buddhists in Thailand pay homage at the temple or ‘wat’ as they believe it is a way to make merit. They consider paying homage to the principal Buddha image or to the main Chedi of the 9 Sacred Sites in Bangkok temple as an auspicious activity that grants them happiness and good luck. The number nine is considered auspicious because it is pronounced as ‘kao,’ similar to the word meaning ‘to progress’ or ‘to step forward.’ Therefore it is believed that a visit to nine sacred temples in one day gives the worshippers prosperity and good luck.
    [Show full text]
  • Ida Fan Lindbergh High School Saint Louis, MO, USA Thailand, Food Spoilage and Waste
    Ida Fan Lindbergh High School Saint Louis, MO, USA Thailand, Food Spoilage and Waste Thailand: The Pathway to Reduced Food Spoilage As of 2020, more than 69 million people inhabit Thailand (“Thailand Population”). In the center of Southeast Asia, Thailand had various ecosystems, such as the forests in the North, level grounds in the Northeast, and rocky coasts in the South (Keyes). Thailand's climate consists of extreme humidity, the key to its success in farming, and a mean annual temperature of 82°F taking into regard the three distinct seasons. Due to its location in the tropics and its climate, Thailand was almost entirely an agricultural nation for the majority of its existence. Recent changes still reflect the importance of farming in the country: Half of the population is rural, living in small villages and growing much of their own food with occasional trips to larger towns for necessities, and arable land made 43.28% of Thailand in 2016 (“Thailand - Rural Population”). The average farm size is 4.5 ha, 450% larger than the size of farms in the country’s neighbor, Japan. Most of Thailand’s farms grow rice, one of the most key crops in Asia, and while sugarcane and tobacco are some of the country’s main crops and exports, rice is the most major crop and export with around 60% of Thailand farmers growing it (Hays). In 1932, Thailand became a constitutional monarchy. With a monarch as the head of state, this change of government paved the way to an increasing number of people who moved to the capital of Thailand, Bangkok, and other urban cities in the 1960s (Ouyyanont).
    [Show full text]
  • Ayutthaya Wat Phra Si Sanphet Saraburi • Ang Thong • Suphan Buri Pathum Thani • Nonthaburi Contents Ayutthaya 8 Pathum Thani 44
    Ayutthaya Wat Phra Si Sanphet Saraburi • Ang Thong • Suphan Buri Pathum Thani • Nonthaburi Contents Ayutthaya 8 Pathum Thani 44 Saraburi 24 Nonthaburi 50 Ang Thong 32 Suphan Buri 38 8 Wat Mahathat Ayutthaya The ancient city of Ayutthaya, formally designated Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya was the Thai capital for 417 years, and is one of Thailand’s major tourist attractions. 8 9 Ayutthaya province is relatively small at 2,557 sq. km. and is easily accessible due to good road, rail and river connections and its proximity to Bangkok. Straddling the Chao Phraya River, the nation’s principal waterway, the province is extremely important, as it was the Siamese capital for four centuries. The city of Ayutthaya is 76 km. north of Bangkok and boasts numerous magnificent ruins from its days as the capital. Just to the south, in perfect condition, stands the royal palace of Bang Pa-in set in splendid gardens. The province is also noted for H.M. the Queen’s Bang Sai Arts and Crafts Centre. The ancient city of Ayutthaya, formally designated Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya was the Thai capital for 417 years, and is one of Thailand’s major tourist attractions. Many ancient ruins and art works can be seen in a city that was founded in 1350 by King U-Thong when the Thais were forced southwards by northern neighbours. During the period when Ayutthaya was capital, 33 kings and several dynasties ruled the kingdom, until the glittering city was sacked by the Burmese in 1767, ruined and abandoned. The extensive ruins and the historical records demonstrate that Ayutthaya was one of Southeast Asia’s most prosperous cities.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Counter-Memorial of the Royal Government of Thailand
    4. COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE ROYAL GOVERNMENT OF THAILAND I. The present dispute concerns the sovereignty over a portion of land on which the temple of Phra Viharn stands. ("PhraViharn", which is the Thai spelling of the name, is used throughout this pleading. "Preah Vihear" is the Cambodian spelling.) 2. According to the Application (par. I), ThaiIand has, since 1949, persisted in the occupation of a portion of Cambodian territory. This accusation is quite unjustified. As will be abundantly demon- strated in the follo~vingpages, the territory in question was Siamese before the Treaty of 1904,was Ieft to Siam by the Treaty and has continued to be considered and treated as such by Thailand without any protest on the part of France or Cambodia until 1949. 3. The Government of Cambodia alleges that its "right can be established from three points of rieivJ' (Application, par. 2). The first of these is said to be "the terms of the international conventions delimiting the frontier between Cambodia and Thailand". More particuIarly, Cambodia has stated in its Application (par. 4, p. 7) that a Treaty of 13th February, 1904 ". is fundamental for the purposes of the settlement of the present dispute". The Government of Thailand agrees that this Treaty is fundamental. It is therefore common ground between the parties that the basic issue before the Court is the appIication or interpretation of that Treaty. It defines the boundary in the area of the temple as the watershed in the Dangrek mountains. The true effect of the Treaty, as will be demonstratcd later, is to put the temple on the Thai side of the frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial System in Thailand
    BRIEFING NOTE The Senate Commission 6 Relationship between the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial System in Thailand August 2017 Researcher: Ms. Heng Nida Assisted by: Ms. Chea Sokun Minea Mr. Chhan Paul Notice of Disclaimer The Parliamentary Institute of Cambodia (PIC) is an independent parliamentary support institution for the Cambodian Parliament which, upon request of the parliamentarians and the parliamentary commissions, offers a wide range of research publications on current and emerging key issues, legislation and major public policy topics. These publications provide information on subjects that are relevant to parliamentary and constituency work but do not purport to represent or reflect the views of the Parliamentary Institute of Cambodia, the Parliament of Cambodia, or of any of its members. The content of this publication, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only. This publication is not designed to provide legal or policy advice, and do not necessarily deal with every important topic or aspect of the issues it considers. The content of this publication is covered by applicable Cambodian laws and international copyright agreements. Permission to reproduce in whole or in part or otherwise use the content on this publication may be sought from the appropriate source. © 2017 Parliamentary Institute of Cambodia (PIC) Contents I. Introduction...................................................................................................1 II. Judicial System in Thailand.............................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Reclamation and Regeneration of the Ancient Baray
    RECLAMATION AND REGENERATION OF THE ANCIENT BARAY A Proposal for Phimai Historical Park Olmtong Ektanitphong December 2014 Submitted towards the fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Architecture Degree. School of Architecture University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Doctorate Project Committee Kazi K. Ashraf, Chairperson William R. Chapman, Committee Member Pornthum Thumwimol, Committee Member ACKNOWLEDMENTS I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Kazi K. Ashraf, who has the attitude and the substance of a genius: he continually and convincingly a spirit of adventure in regard to research and the design, and excitement in regard to teaching. Without his guidance and persistent help this dissertation would not have been possible. I would like to thank my committee members, Professor William R. Chapman and Dr. Pornthum Thumwimol, whose work demonstrated to me that concern for archaeological aspects of Khmer and Thai culture. They supported me immensely throughout the period of my dissertation. Their valuable advice and discussions guided me to the end-result of this study. I highly appreciated for their generally being a good uncle and brother as well as a supervisor. In addition, a thank you to the director, archaeologists, academic officers and administration staff at Phimai Historical Park and at the Fine Arts Department of Thailand, who gave me such valuable information and discussion. Specially, thank you to Mr. Teerachat veerayuttanond, my supervisor during internship with The Fine Arts Department of Thailand, who first introduced me to Phimai Town and took me on the site survey at Phimai Town. Last but not least, I would like to thank University of Hawaii for giving me the opportunity for my study research and design.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thailand's Gastrodiplomacy As A
    CHAPTER IV THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE IMPLEMENTATION THAILAND GASTRODIPLOMACY This chapter will discuss the factors that influence Thailand‟s Gastrodiplomacy implementation to build their national branding through the culinary promotion in international arena. There are some aspects that interconnected with each other. A. Natural Resources Thailand is famous of the agricultural production. The production of rice production, in overall, increases positively from 2002 to 2012. Thailand's economy depends on exports, with an export value of about 60% of GDP. About 60% of all Thai labor force is worked in agriculture sector. Thailand is a rice major exporter in the world market. Other commodities produced in large quantities are fish and other fishery products, tapioca, rubber, grains, and sugar. Exports of finished food such as canned tuna, pineapple and frozen shrimp etc (Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs , 2017). The Thai government‟s attempt to increasing income for farmers is relatively high, and the industry and working relationship between the government and farmers in Thailand are very good. Thailand is a country that has a good agricultural system in the world. In this country agri-education system is improved, production and capital facilities are provided, infrastructure is built with excellent quality. In fact, to reach the international market, the standards used in importing countries are applied to farmers. Every farmer who will export his products must run two standards, GAP (good agricultural practices) and GMP (good 35 36 manufacturing practices) (Korpraditskul & Ratanakreetakul, 2015). If the farmer has run the program, the government pays the certification. The success of the Thai Government in the agricultural sector is due to the allegiance of King Bhumibol Abuljadey protecting the peasants.
    [Show full text]
  • Children and Youth in Thailand
    1 Children and Youth in Thailand Wirot Sanrattana Merrill M. Oaks Being published 2 National Profile Thailand is a rich tapestry of traditional and modern culture. Located in Southeastern Asia, bordering the Andaman Sea and the Gulf of Thailand, southeast of Myanmar (Burma) – see map. “Siam” is the name by which the country was known to the world until 1949. On May 11, 1949 an official proclamation changed the name to “Prathet Thai” or “Thailand”. The word “Thai” means “free”, and therefore “Thailand” means “Land of the Free”. Thailand’s known as the “Land of Smiles” for the friendliness of its people. A unified Thai kingdom was established in the mid-14th century. Thailand is the only Southeast Asian country never to have been taken over by a European or other world power. A bloodless revolution in 1932 led to a constitutional monarchy. The provisions relating in the constitutional government and monarchy laid down in the 1932 Constitution specified three basic concepts regarding the governmental structure. First, the Monarch is regarded as Head of State, Head of the Armed Forces and Upholder of the Buddhist Religion and all other religions. Second, a bicameral National Assembly, which is comprised of members of Parliament and members of Senate, administers the legislative branch. Third, the Prime Minister as head of the government and chief executive oversees the executive branch covering the Council of Ministers which is responsible for the administration of 19 ministries and the Office of the Prime Minister. Buddhism is the pre-dominate religion with a minority of other world religions represented throughout the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms: a Diagnostic Scan
    OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform Thailand Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms: A Diagnostic Scan 2020 OECD work on RIA: http://oe.cd/ria OECD work on regulatory policy: http://oe.cd/regpol For further information, please contact: [email protected] [email protected] OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms in Thailand A Diagnostic Scan PUBE 2 This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2020), “Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms in Thailand: A Diagnostic Scan”, OECD, Paris. Photo credits: Cover © SOUTHERNTraveler/Shutterstock.com; © Nuttawut Uttamaharad/Shutterstock.com; © CC7/Shutterstock.com; © Balate Dorin/Shutterstock.com; © michel arnault/Shutterstock.com © OECD 2020 The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions. REGULATORY MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT REFORMS IN THAILAND © OECD 2020 3 Foreword The success of Thailand’s strategic vision for continued sustainable economic and social development relies on the interplay of multiple factors. Good regulatory practices are a key component of the 2017 Constitution of Thailand, and are woven into the Thai National Strategy (2018-2037), Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan, and the “Thailand 4.0” strategy. GRPs can ensure that policies and regulations are well designed, effectively implemented and regularly assessed. This requires an adequate institutional set-up, clearly designated responsibilities in the public service, capacity for managing good regulatory practices, and better regulatory oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance in Thailand: Challenges, Issues and Prospects [1999]
    GOVERNANCE IN THAILAND: CHALLENGES, ISSUES AND PROSPECTS In our rush to catch up with the West, the lessons we learned-- from the West and from our past--were incomplete. While the West had evolved checks and balances to curb the excesses of capitalism, in our exuberance to reap the fruits of capitalism the need for such mechanisms was unheeded. While transparency and accountability had long been pillars of public governance in the West, in Asia the webs of power and money remain largely hidden from public view...We created a hybrid form of capitalism where patronage was put to the service of profit-maximization, indeed a recipe for unbalanced and unsustainable development. --Anand Panyarachun, former Prime Minister of Thailand February, 1998-- Asian Development Bank April, 1999 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank ASEAN - Association of Southeast Asian Nations AusAID - Australian Agency for International Development BOB - Bureau of Budget BOT - Bank of Thailand CCC - Counter Corruption Commission CGD - Comptroller General's Office CSC - Civil Service Commission CSSCs - Civil Service Sub-Commissions EGAT - Electric Generating Authority of Thailand FIDF - Financial Institutions Development Fund FPO - Fiscal Policy Office GES - Good Enterprise System GNP - Gross national product IMF - International Monetary Fund MOI - Ministry of Interior MP - Member of Parliament MOJ - Ministry of Justice MOF - Ministry of Finance NAP - New Aspiration Party NBT - National Broadcasting Services of Thailand NCCC - National Counter Corruption
    [Show full text]