DOCSLIB.ORG

Revised Preliminary Plan Cobblestone Park Montville Township

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revised Preliminary Plan Cobblestone Park Montville Township Planning Commission Revised Preliminary Plan Cobblestone Park Montville Township App. No.: 130-2016-RPP Site Area: 37.58 acres Meeting: February 1, 2017 Open Space: 4.64 acres Applicant: Cobblestone Park Development Utilities: Central water & sewer Group, LLC School Dist.: Medina City Engineer: TGC Engineering Sublots: 20 in Phase 4B & 21 in 3B Zoning: Cobblestone Park PND Reviewer: Susan Hirsch EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Revised Preliminary Plan amends Phases 4 and 5 of the most current Preliminary Plan approved March 4, 2015 by changing Phases 4 and 5 to 4A and 4B. The proposed Revised Preliminary Plan indicates an addition of three sublots, minor changes to the roadway configuration, and a decrease in open space acreage. Recommendation: APPROVE WITH MODIFICATIONS ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE North Cobblestone Park - PND Single-family detached homes East Cobblestone Park - PND Single-family detached homes South R-R Residential Single-family detached homes along Poe Rd. Arbor Park at Cobblestone – Undeveloped – proposed cluster homes, and West PND and R-R Residential Single-family detached homes along Poe Rd. Proposal: The subject site is located in the southwest portion of the subdivision. Cobblestone Park is located on the east side of Wooster Pike (SR 3) between Sharon Copley Road and Poe Road. This revised Preliminary Plan amends what was previously referred to as “Phase 4B” from 17 to 20 sublots and reduces the open space area. There is also a change in the roadway configuration of Soapstone Drive to include an “eyebrow.” Access: Access to the Cobblestone Park subdivision is from Poe Road on the south, Highland Park Drive on the north and Wooster Pike Road (SR 3) on the west. Access to 4B is via Stonyridge Drive from Cobblestone Drive and 3B via Ridgestone Way from Cobblefield Drive. Cobblestone Park, Revised Preliminary Plan Approval Site Conditions: The site is primarily flat. Subdivision Stage Phase Wetlands exist in the north central and Date southwestern portions of the site. Concept Plan Dec. 2003 Preliminary Plan Feb. 2004 History: The Planning Commission originally Rev. Preliminary Plan April 2004 approved the Preliminary Plan for the Rev. Preliminary Plan May 2004 Cobblestone Park subdivision in February of 2004 Final Plat 1A May 2004 and it has been revised many times since. A Final Plat 1B Jan. 2005 Revised Preliminary Plan was approved in March Replat 1A Feb. 2006 of 2015 and a Final Plat for Phase 4A was Rev. Preliminary Plan March 2006 approved in November of 2015. A detailed Final Plat 2A March 2006 timeline is shown to the right. Final Plat 2B March 2006 Preliminary Plan Ext March 2008 Agency Comments: Italicized text indicates Preliminary Plan 3A & 3B April 2013 agency comments. Rev. Preliminary Plan Created 3C Oct. 2013 (admin. approval) Tax Maps: Beth Mika, 1/23/2017. Final Plat 3A July 2014 Preliminary Plan - CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Feb. 2015 1. Sublots numbers on Luckystone Drive and Arbors at Cobblestone Brownstone Drive have been used in Preliminary Plan 4 & 5 March 2015 another phase. Also, Parcel number in this Final Plat 4A Nov. 2015 area is not current. 2. Tax Maps has no objections regarding the overall layout of this future phase. 3. Subject to all Tax Map Dept. comments from previous Planning Dept. reviews and/or extension requests. 4. It is recommended that you submit the final subdivision plat to Tax Maps for review,before obtaining signatures. 5. Subject to Medina County Engineer Land Conveyence Standards found at: http://engineer.medinaco.org/surveying/landconveystds.pdf Medina County Highway Engineer: Andy Conrad, 1/20/2017. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. 1. Deed restrict and show on plans and plat the driveway location for S/L 444 to the far east side of the Sublot. 2. Provide typical shoulder/ditch section along frontage of S/L 447. 3. Provide note on plans and plat that no fences are to be constructed within any storm sewer or storm sewer easements. 4. Are S/Ls 430, 441 and 442 viable building sites? Columbia Gas: Russ Johnson, 1/13/2017 TransCanada does not have facilities that are impacted with this project. Montville Township, Planning and Zoning: Paul Jeffers, 1/12/2017. Conditional Approval: This plan has yet to be reviewed by the Zoning Commission. The separation of open space into a sublot still complies with the amount of open space required by the Zoning Resolution. Medina County Planning Commission Page 2 of 4 February 1, 2017 Cobblestone Park, Revised Preliminary Plan ODOT: Jared Feller, 1/12/2017. ODOT has no objections to the revised preliminary plan for Cobblestone Park Subdivision. Medina County Sanitary Engineer: Jeremy Sinko, 1/12/2017. Detailed engineering plans at the time of construction must meet the current rules and regulations for water and sanitary sewer per the Medina County Sanitary Engineers Medina County Health Department: Steve Mazak, 1/12/2017. Cobblestone Park subdivision will be serviced by sanitary sewer and public water. Therefore, our office has no further comments. Soil and Water Conservation District: Jim Deiter, 1/12/2017. I do not have any comments regarding Cobblestone Subdivision. Staff Comments: 1. Except for the following, the Preliminary Plan is substantially similar to the currently approved Preliminary Plan for Phase 3B and 4B: The number of sublots in Phase 4B has increased from 17 to 20 sublots. The street that connects Cobblestone Drive to Stonyridge Drive (Soapstone Drive) has changed to include an “eyebrow”. This roadway change results in a reduction in “Open Space” and an additional 2 sublots. The third additional sublot fronts on Poe Road. It was previously a portion of “Future Development” Block LL. The “Open Space” in Phase 4B has decreased from 18.10 acres to 4.59 acres. 2. Although there are no changes to Phase 3B, it is included in the Preliminary Plan since it has not been platted. Also, the location map must be revised to exclude Phase 3A. 3. The zoning for this Preliminary Plan is incorrectly indicated as R-1 under Zoning Information, it is zoned Planned Neighborhood Development District (PND). The PND permits detached single-family dwellings, detached cluster single-family dwellings and attached single-family dwellings provided that not more than four such dwellings shall be attached in any single building. Area for open space and recreational shall not be less than 30% of the total land area of the PND. The Preliminary Plan, as submitted, appears to meet the requirements of the PND. 4. The following required data/information was not provided on or with the Revised Preliminary Plan (Subdivision Regulation section references are included): a. Total number of lots, area of lots and blocks and parcels, area of public roadways, … and total area of the subdivision. 404(C)(2)a.7. Add a subdivision summary table with above listed elements. b. Existing generalized natural features: including… streams, [and] rivers…. § 404(C)(2)b.7. Show streams. c. Proposed streets identified by name or letter designation, right-of-way width and pavement width. § 404(C)(2)c.5. Indicate names of all streets within the area of the Preliminary Plan. d. Wetlands –The developer shall contact in writing the applicable U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) District Office regarding the proposed subdivision, and shall submit such correspondence to the Medina County Planning Commission as Medina County Planning Commission Page 3 of 4 February 1, 2017 Cobblestone Park, Revised Preliminary Plan a condition of Preliminary Plan approval. § 404(C)(2)c.18. While wetlands are depicted, wetland delineation and USACE jurisdictional determinations (JD) are valid for five years. The applicant shall demonstrate recent correspondence with the USACE and a current JD and update the depicted wetland boundaries if warranted. e. Existing topography at two-foot intervals…. § 404(C)(2)d.1. Show topography. f. All related watershed boundaries, indicating in which watershed the subdivision is located, and all known underground drainage tile systems. This may be presented as a map insert on the same page. § 404(C)(2)d.4. Provide a watershed boundary inset map. g. A copy of the Developers Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain an Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) stormwater management permit…. § 404(C)(2)d.7. Provide a copy of the OEPA NOI if applicable. 4. Section 570.3C.3. of the Montville Township Zoning Resolution establishes a 25 foot setback from all Ohio EPA Category 1 Wetlands and a 75 foot setback from all Ohio EPA Category 2 Wetlands. Several sublots appear to be impacted by the wetlands and/or the required wetlands setbacks. Deeds for these sublots should include a reference to the existence of the wetlands/wetlands setbacks and the fact that the area is not to be disturbed. 5. Add cover sheet showing the complete Cobblestone Park Subdivision and indicating the location of the phases included in this Preliminary Plan. 6. The “Covenants and Restrictions” for the Homeowner’s Association has been reviewed and approved by the Medina County Prosecutor’s Office. Any revisions to the original HOA documents must be submitted for transmittal to the Township and Prosecutor’s Office for review and approval. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS of the Revised Preliminary Plan for Cobblestone Park Subdivision. Prior to Final Plat submittal, applicant must submit three copies of a corrected Preliminary Plan indicating the following: 1. Submit the required data/information listed above on or with a corrected Preliminary Plan. 2. Satisfy the Highway Engineer and Tax Maps comments listed above. 3. Deeds for any sublots containing wetlands or wetland setbacks should include a reference to the existence of the wetlands/wetlands setbacks and the fact that the area is not to be disturbed. 4. Revise the Location Map to omit Phase 3A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 Low-Volume Roads Engineering
    Chapter 4 Chapter Chapter 4 Low-Volume Roads Engineering Low-V Low-V Low-V Low-V Low-V olume R olume R olume R olume R olume R “You get what you Inspect, not what you Expect.” LOW VOLUME ROAD is considered a road The basic steps are: oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering that has relatively low use (an Average Planning A Daily Traffic of less than 400 vehicles per day), Location low design speeds (typically less than 80 kph), and Survey corresponding geometry. Most roads in rural areas are Design low-volume roads. A well planned, located, designed, Construction constructed, and maintained low-volume road system Maintenance is essential for community development, flow of goods If any one of these steps is omitted, a road may and services between communities, and resource perform poorly, not meet its expectations, fail management activities. However roads, and particularly prematurely, require unnecessarily high maintenance, or road construction, can create more soil erosion than cause environmental impacts. Without planning and most other activities that occur in rural areas. Proper good location, a road may not adequately serve its users planning and design of the road system will minimize or may be in a problematic area. Survey and design are adverse impacts to water quality. Poorly planned road needed to fit the road to the ground and have it function systems can have high maintenance and repair costs, properly. Good construction insures that the design is contribute to excessive erosion, and fail to meet the needs implemented and built with some degree of quality of the users.
    [Show full text]
  • Daviess County Road and Street Index
    2/22/2021 Daviess County Road and Street Index Route Begin End Length Road Name Number Location Location (miles) Abbie Avenue 1078 KY 2830 Dead End 0.143 Access Road to KY 456 1195 KY 456 Dead End 0.060 Acorn Ridge Court 1334 Beech Hill Drive Dead End 0.141 Affirmed Court 1010D Bold Forbes Way Cul-de-sac 0.047 Alley - 1 (Maceo) 1072L Church Lane 189' W.of High St. 0.094 Alley - 2 (Maceo) 1438 Sacra Drive Dead End 0.039 Alley - 3 (Stanley) 1355C Church Street US 60 0.136 Alley - 4 (Stanley) 1355E Church Street Griffith Station Road 0.103 Alley - 5 (Stanley) 1355D Church Street French Island Road 0.095 Alley - 6 (Brown Court) 1092Z Brown Court Stewart Court 0.137 Alma Court 1112C Waterfield Drive Cul-de-sac 0.159 Alsop Lane 1092A8 US 60 City Limits 0.442 Alvey Bridge Road 1298 KY 279 Hayden Bridge Road 1.454 Alvey Park Drive East 1105 KY 54 Alvey Park Drive W 0.328 Alvey Park Drive West 1106 KY 54 Alvey Park Drive E 0.340 Amethyst Court 1420E Diamond Drive Cul-de-sac 0.053 Antler Avenue 1120E Dead End Foors Lane 0.604 Aristides Drive 1010P Bold Forbes Way Cul-de-sac 0.132 Ashbyburg Road 1247 KY 81 KY 554 1.116 Ashland Avenue 1387B Rand Road (west) Rand Road (east) 0.327 Ashland Avenue Spur 1387B-80 Ashland Avenue End of Maintenance 0.025 At The Post Court 1507k Stirrup Loop Cul-de-sac 0.140 Aubrey Road 1072B Rockport Ferry Road Dead End 0.393 Aubrey Road Connector - 1 1072B-70 Aubry Road KY 2830 (south) 0.019 Aubrey Road Connector - 2 1072B-71 Aubry Road KY 2830 (north) 0.027 Aull Road 1031 Jack Hinton Road KY 144 2.538 Autumn Creek 1213
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences a Report to the Federal Highway Administration
    Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences A Report to the Federal Highway Administration July 2010 Vinayak V. Dixit, Rami C. Harb, Glenn W. Harrison, Donald M. Marco, M. Seph Mard, A. Essam Radwan, Elisabet E. H. Rutstrom, and Mark P. Schneider* Georgia State University (Harrison, Mard, Rutstrom, Schneider) Louisiana State University (Dixit) University of Central Florida (Harb, Radwan, Marco) * Authors are listed alphabetically. The report is prepared as part of the project “Experiments on Driving under Uncertain Congestion Conditions and the Effects on Traffic Networks from Congestion Pricing Initiatives” which is funded under the “Exploratory Advanced Research Program” as Collaborative Agreement DTFH61-09-H-00012 Contact Person: Dr. Essam Radwan, P.E., Professor of Engineering Center for Advanced Transportation Systems Simulation Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering University of Central Florida Orlando, FL 32816-2450 Email: [email protected] 1 Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences Traffic congestion is a major problem in many urban areas. According to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI, 2009), the average American driver lost 36 hours in 2007 sitting in congestion, wasting an average of 24 gallons of fuel. The average losses per driver in cities where the population exceeded one million were 25% higher. These costs were quantified into a national productivity loss of $87.2 billion, a four-fold increase (in 2007 dollars) from 1982. This figure does not take into account local air quality degradation due to the burning of the wasted fuel; though that externality is partly mitigated by the recent push towards electric and hybrid vehicles and the ongoing increases in fuel efficiency standards (Halsey, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Cobblestone Buildings: Their Nature in General
    Cobblestone Buildings: Their Nature in General As Rich and Sue Freeman say so well in the introduction to their book Cobblestone Quest, Upstate NY residents drive by cobblestone houses and usually give them very little thought. Most people barely recognize that this area was the pre-Civil War birthplace of a new form of construction. It’s a method that remains peculiar to our region with over 90% of the cobblestone buildings in the entire United States being located within a 65-mile radius of Rochester, New York. Estimates vary, but approximately 700 to 1,200 cobblestone buildings were built in the United States. Between 600 and 900 of them are in New York State, spread over 25 counties, spanning from the Hudson River to Niagara Falls.1 Using an Ice Age residue of glacially-rounded native stones, pioneer craftsmen in the middle third of the nineteenth century perfected a form of folk art that was without precedent in America.2 This cobblestone craft that developed in this greater Rochester area flourished, spread and died out within less than half a century. Nevertheless, it left its stamp permanently on this region. According to Rich and Sue Freeman, who wrote the book Cobblestone Quest in 2005, it holds a place in history as the last generation of completely hand-built houses.3 While this article is dealing with cobblestone buildings as a construction method—not an architectural style—it can be said that most cobblestone buildings are Greek Revival in style. Those constructed before 1835 were, however, usually in the Federal style.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexibility in Highway Design
    Flexibility in Highway Design U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Page i This page intentionally left blank. Page ii A Message from the Administrator Dear Colleague: One of the greatest challenges the highway community faces is providing safe, efficient transportation service that conserves, and even enhances the environmental, scenic, historic, and community resources that are so vital to our way of life. This guide will help you meet that challenge. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has been pleased to work with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and other interested groups, including the Bicycle Federation of America, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and Scenic America, to develop this publication. It identifies and explains the opportunities, flexibilities, and constraints facing designers and design teams responsible for the development of transportation facilities. This guide does not attempt to create new standards. Rather, the guide builds on the flexibility in current laws and regulations to explore opportunities to use flexible design as a tool to help sustain important community interests without compromising safety. To do so, this guide stresses the need to identify and discuss those flexibilities and to continue breaking down barriers that sometimes make it difficult for highway designers to be aware of local concerns of interested organizations and citizens. The partnership formed to develop this guidance grew out of the design-related provisions of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. Congress provided dramatic new flexibilities in funding, stressed the importance of preserving historic and scenic values, and provided for enhancing communities through transportation improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearl District Existing Conditions Report
    Pearl District Access and Circulation Plan Existing Conditions Report Introduction This report reviews existing conditions related to land use and transportation in the study area. The Pearl District is located within the larger River District Urban Renewal Area, and is bordered by NW Broadway Avenue to the east, Interstate 405 to the west, W Burnside to the south, and the Willamette River to the north (Map 1). Below is a brief summary of existing conditions. For more detailed discussion of the transportation issues in the area, additional information, data, and maps are provided following the summary. Summary The Pearl District has street system and urban form characteristics that are similar to the Downtown and Old Town/Chinatown neighborhoods, with generally the same 200‐foot by 200‐foot block grid, and dense, mixed commercial/residential development. However, unlike its neighbors, much of the Pearl has been almost entirely rebuilt over the last 15 years with a predominance of residential construction. Fueled by infrastructure investments and a set of policies and development agreements following the River District Urban Renewal Area’s creation in 1998, the District has experienced rapid residential and commercial growth. The urban neighborhood built through these efforts has become a national model for inner city redevelopment. The District has many of the transportation characteristics of healthy, mature, 24‐hour mixed use areas, including high pedestrian and transit use, low reliance on the automobile compared to suburban areas, and a mix of residential, office, institutional and retail uses. As a result, Pearl residents, employers and visitors travel half as much by car as the regional average, and have much lower carbon emissions per capita from transportation sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2300 – Incidental Construction
    DIVISION II CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS SEWERS SECTION 2300 – INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2301 STANDARD SIDEWALKS, SIDEWALK RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN PATHS ......... 1 2301.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2301.2 Referenced Standards ................................................................................................................................... 1 2301.3 Materials ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 2301.4 Construction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2301.5 Method of Measurement ................................................................................................................................ 6 2301.6 Basis of Payment ........................................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 2302 ASPHALT SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATHS................................. 7 2302.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Granite Restoration – South Segment
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR Esplanade Granite Restoration – South Segment Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 1 II. GENERAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................................................................... 1 III. TIMETABLE & DESIGNATED CONTACT ............................................................................................ 2 A. Key Dates .............................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Anticipated Contract Term .................................................................................................................... 2 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 A. Minimum Qualification Requirements .................................................................................................. 2 B. MBE/WBE/SDVOB Participation, Joint Ventures, and Sub-contracting Goals .................................. 3 C. Restricted Period ................................................................................................................................... 3 D. Submission of Proposals ....................................................................................................................... 3 V. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2010 From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Jayne O. Spector University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Spector, Jayne O., "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment" (2010). Theses (Historic Preservation). 150. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 Suggested Citation: Spector, Jayne O. (2010). "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Abstract The outcomes of preserving and incorporating industrial building fabric and related infrastructure, such as railways, docks and cranes, in redeveloped waterfront sites have yet to be fully understood by planners, preservationists, public administrators or developers. Case studies of Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Philadelphia/ Camden, Dublin, Glasgow, examine the industrial history, redevelopment planning and approach to preservation and adaptive reuse in each locale. The effects of contested industrial histories,
    [Show full text]
  • Cobblestone Traffic Study
    Town of Avon Traffic Calming Program Traffic Investigation Report July 2012 (Draft) Cobblestone Springs (2) Subdivision Prepared by Town of Avon Traffic Calming Program Traffic Investigation Report Cobblestone Springs (2) Subdivision July, 2012 (Draft) Report Table of Contents Purpose of Traffic Investigation Problems Identified by Neighborhood Neighborhood Roadway Characteristics Recorded Traffic Data Analysis of Traffic and Roadway Data Remediation Alternatives Recommended Alternative and Estimated Cost Implementation Plan Directly Affected Area Neighborhood Survey Results Public Works Department Recommendation Town Council Action Implementation Program Appendix Neighborhood Petition Letter Roadway Data Checklist Traffic Data Locations Traffic Data Table Proposed Speed Hump Location Directly Affected Area Exhibit Petition Letter Response from the Town Neighborhood Survey Letter Neighborhood Survey Response Summary Traffic Calming Design Guidelines Traffic Investigation Report Purpose of Traffic Investigation A traffic investigation was performed to measure and observe motorist, bicyclist, and pedestrian behavior and safety as well as to note the existing roadway characteristics. The investigation is intended to focus on the problems identified by the neighborhood petition letters, as well as problems observed during the course of the investigation. Traffic counts and speeds have been recorded. Based on this information, recommendations have been made which will be implemented by the Town provided that a clear majority of the directly affected residents who return a completed survey form to the Town approve of the recommended changes. Problems Identified by the Neighborhood (see Petition letter in Appendix) A petition, dated 4/13/12, and signed by the Cobblestone Springs Home Owners Association President, was submitted to the Town identifying neighborhood traffic concerns and requesting that the Town of Avon study traffic on Cobblesprings Drive between Winterwood Drive and Cobblesprings Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Ii Construction and Material Specifications Streets
    DIVISION II CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS STREETS SECTION 2300 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION Approved and Adopted this 18th day of December, 2002 Kansas City Metropolitan Chapter American Public Works Association SECTION 2301 STANDARD SIDEWALKS, SIDEWALK RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATHS ............................................................ 1 2301.1 Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 2301.2 Materials. ............................................................................................................. 1 2301.3 Construction Details............................................................................................. 1 2301.4 Joints .................................................................................................................... 2 2301.5 Concrete Work..................................................................................................... 4 2301.6 Backfill.................................................................................................................5 2301.7 Joint Sealing and Clean–Up................................................................................. 5 2301.8 Surface Tolerances............................................................................................... 5 2301.9 Detectable Warnings............................................................................................ 5 2301.10 Method of Measurement .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Minutes October 19, 2011
    CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 2011 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Burke at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Keith Diekmann, Paul Scanlan, and David Schindler. Members Absent: Tom Melander and Brian Wasserman. Staff Present: Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, Associate City Planner Kathy Bodmer, City Attorney Sharon Hills, Assistant City Engineer David Bennett, and Department Assistant Joan Murphy. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Hearing none he called for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda for today’s meeting as written. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 5, 2011 Vice Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the minutes. Hearing none he called for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the minutes of the meeting of September 7, 2011, as written. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. 4. CONSENT ITEMS --NONE-- 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Cobblestone Lake South Shore 6th Addition – Consideration of subdivision of 9.14 acres for a one (1) single-family and ten (10) two-family dwelling units on 2.04 acres and one (1) outlot on 7.1 acres that will be dedicated for public park purposes, and site plan/building permit authorization for the 11 dwelling units. (PC11-34-SB) Vice Chair Burke opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m.
    [Show full text]