Full AWS, Data Logger and Soil Moisture Data Sets Collected During This Study Are Presented on CD-ROM (Appendix 5)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full AWS, Data Logger and Soil Moisture Data Sets Collected During This Study Are Presented on CD-ROM (Appendix 5) Durham E-Theses The ecological eects of slope and aspect in chalk grassland Bennie, Jonathan James How to cite: Bennie, Jonathan James (2003) The ecological eects of slope and aspect in chalk grassland, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4017/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk A copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. The Ecological Effects of Slope and Aspect in Chalk Grassland Jonathan James Bennie B.A. M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2003 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 7 'm- 11 Frontispiece: South-facing sward on Hambledon Hill. Ill Table of Contents List of figures vii List of tables x List of plates xi Declaration xii Abstract xiii Acknowledgements xiv Notes on nomenclature used in this thesis xv Glossary of acronyms xvi Chapter 1: Introduction and Aims 1 1.1 Introduction to slope and aspect 1 1.1.1 Slope, aspect and microclimate 1 1.1.2 Slope and aspect in ecological studies 1 1.1.3 Slope and aspect in chalk grassland 2 1.2 Scope and aims of thesis 3 Chapter 2: Background to Study 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Literature review 6 2.2.1 The effects of climate on the distribution of plants 6 2.2.2 Physiological mechanisms 11 2.2.3 Microclimate and topography in grasslands 25 2.2.4 Topography, soils and vegetation in calcareous grasslands 28 2.3 Further analysis of Perring's data 32 2.3.1 The data set 32 2.3.2 Methods of analysis 33 2.3.3 Results 35 2.3.4 Discussion of analyses 47 2.4 Summary of chapter 2 49 iv Chapter 3: Field sites and climate measurement 51 3.1 Introduction 51 3.2 Metliods 51 3.3 Acquisition of digital terrain models (DEM) 53 3.3.1 Hambledon Hill 53 3.3.2 Sylvan Dale 54 3.4 Methods - Macro- and microclimate measurement 60 3.4.1 Measurements at AWS sites .60 3.4.2 Mobile dataloggers 61 3.4.3 Buried temperature loggers 61 3.4.4 Soil moisture measurement 64 3.5 Climatic observations at field sites 65 3.5.1 Comparison of AWS climate between sites 65 3.5.2 Diurnal patterns in radiation and temperature 69 3.5.3 Temperature and altitude at Hambledon Hill 71 3.5.4 "Frost hollow" effect at Sylvan Dale 72 3.5.5 Comparison of temperatures on different slopes 73 3.5.6 Observed patterns in soil temperature 75 3.5.7 Observed patterns in soil moisture 77 3.6 Summary of Chapter 3 79 Chapter 4: Modelling topographic microclimate 81 4.1 Introduction 81 4.2 Approach to modelling topographic microclimate 81 4.2.1 Physical/empirical approaches 81 4.2.3 Landscape-scale variation in screen height climate 82 4.3 Model development 83 4.3.1 Solar radiation 83 4.3.2 Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) 87 4.3.3 Net radiation 87 4.3.4 Near surface temperatures 90 4.3.5 Soil moisture 100 4.4 Model testing and validation 105 4.4.1 Solar radiation 105 4.4.2 Sward temperature 108 V 4.4.3 Soil temperature 110 4.4.4 Soil Moisture 113 4.5 Discussion 117 4.6 Summary of chapter 4 120 Chapter 5: Field experiments and observations 122 5.1 Introduction 122 5.2 Nutrient cycling on contrasting slopes 122 5.2.1 Calcareous grassland soils 122 5.2.2 Nutrient availability in chalk grassland 123 5.2.1 Methods 125 5.2.2 Results 131 5.2.3 Conclusions 140 5.3 Gas-exchange measurements in four chalk grassland species 143 5.3.1 Soil moisture, photosynthesis and water-use efficiency 143 5.3.2 Methods 144 5.3.3 Results 147 5.3.4 Conclusions 149 5.4 Germination of selected chalk grassland species 150 5.4.1 Microclimate and germination 150 5.4.2 Materials and Methods 151 5.4.3 Results 156 5.4.4 Conclusions 156 5.5 Summary of chapter 5 159 Chapter 6: Vegetation analysis 161 6.1 Introduction 161 6.2 Methods 162 6.2.1 Vegetation survey 162 6.2.2 Microclimatic variables 165 6.2.3 Ellenberg and CSR scores 168 6.2.4 Vegetation analysis 168 6.3 Results 169 6.3.1 Qualitative comparison between slopes 169 6.3.2 DCA of sites at Sylvan Dale and Hambledon Hill 173 vi 6.3.3 GAMs of DCA axis 1 and species frequency 177 6.3.4 Vegetation change and topography at Hambledon Hill 1952-2000 183 6.3.5 Change in vegetation plot scores 1952-2000 186 6.4 Discussion 190 6.4.1 Topography, microclimate and vegetation at Hambledon Hill and Sylvan Dale 190 6.4.2 Vegetation change at Hambledon Hill 1952-2000 191 6.5 Summary of chapter 6 196 Chapter 7: General discussion 197 7.1 Introduction 197 7.2 Microclimatic gradients 197 7.2.1 Predicted and observed patterns 197 7.2.3 Limitations of models 199 7.3 Soil gradients 200 7.3.1 Spatial heterogeneity 200 7.3.2 Microclimate and soils 201 7.3.3 Topography and soils 202 7.4 Vegetation gradients 203 7.4.1 The effect of soil moisture on vegetation 204 7.4.2 Species response to microclimate 205 7.7 Topography and vegetation change 207 7.7.1 Vegetation change at Hambledon Hill 1952-2000 207 7.7.2 Topography and future vegetation change 207 References 210 Appendix 1 236 Appendix 2 237 Appendix 3 238 Appendix 4 241 Appendix 5 CD Vll List of figures Figure 2.1: Distributions of selected species, from Perring (1959) 31 Figure 2.2: Ordination of first two DCA axes 36 Figure 2.3: Ordination of first two DCA axes; CSR indices 37 Figure 2.4: Ordination of first two DCA axes; Ellenberg indices 38 Figure 2.5: Triangular C-S-R plot of Grime's indices for each plot 39 Figure 2.6: DCA axis 1 GAM partial residual plots 42 Figure 2.7: DCA axis 2 GAM partial residual plots 43 Figure 2.8: Hippocrepis comosa GAM residual plots 44 Figure 2.9: Asperula cynanchica GAM residual plots 45 Figure 2.10: Sanguisorba minor GAM residual plots 46 Figure 1.11: Plantago lanceolata GAM residual plots 47 Figure 2.12: Holcus lanatus GAM residual plots 47 Figure 3.1: Location of field sites 52 Figure 3.2: Contour map derived from Hambledon Hill DEM 55 Figure 3.3: Contour map derived from Sylvan Dale DEM 56 Figure 3.4: False shading image of Hambledon Hill DEM 58 Figure 3.5: False shading image of Sylvan Dale DEM 59 Figure 3.6: Contour map of Sylvan dale showing data loggers 63 Figure 3.7: Contour map of Hambledon Hill showing data loggers 64 Figure 3.8: Mean monthly screen height air temperature at field sites 65 Figure 3.9: Total monthly rainfall at field sites 66 Figure 3.10: Mean monthly relative humidity at field sites 67 Figure 3.11: Monthly mean hourly solar insolation at field sites 67 Figure 3.12: Monthly mean wind speed at field sites 68 Figure 3.13: Daily mean soil moisture (0-5 cm depth) at field sites 69 Figure 3.14: Hourly mean temperatures 25/06/01 at Hambledon AWS 70 Figure 3.15: Hourly mean solar radiation 25/06/01 70 Figure 3.16: Daily minimum screen temperature measured at Hambledon AWS and Fontmell Magna Met Office station during 2001 71 Figure 3.17: Daily maximum screen temperature measured at Hambledon AWS and Fontmell Magna Met Office station during 2001 72 Figure 3.18: Hourly sward temperature measured at Sylvan Dale 73 viii Figure 3.19: Hourly mean climatic data measured at datalogger sites 74 Figure 3.20: Soil temperature under short turf and tussock (green) 75 Figure 3.21: Soil temperature at different altitudes, Hambledon Hill 76 Figure 3.22: Soil temperature at different altitudes, Hambledon Hill 77 Figure 3.23: Soil moisture at (a) Hambledon Hill (b) Sylvan Dale 78 Figure 4.1: Hourly mean modelled and measured solar radiation 85 Figure 4.2: Hourly mean global solar radiation vs PAR 88 Figure 4.3: Hourly mean global solar radiation vs net radiation 88 Figure 4.4: Model of radiation on slopes 91 Figure 4.5: Hourly mean temperatures at Hambledon Hill AWS, 2001 93 Figure 4.6: Values of WpCp plotted against mid-point windspeed 97 Figure 4.7: Model of sward and soil temperature on slopes 100 Figure 4.9: Modelled and measured solar radiation on slopes 106 Figure 4.10: Modelled and measured sward temperature.
Recommended publications
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs
    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Natural area: 27. Fenland Lowland Grassland Significance: CONSIDERABLE Dewiption: A very distinctive flat, low-lying basin made up of post-glacial peat, clay and silt dcpnsits crossed by the rivers Welland, Nene, Ouse, Withain and Glen and their tributaries which drain into the Wash. The landscapc has bccn considerably influenced by man, particularly over the last 300 years, with the succersful drainage of the area which has resultcd in thc current dominance of intensive arable cropping. Thc two key remaining areas of grassland are the Ouse and Ncnc Washes which were created during thc draining of the fen. These now support largc tracts of wet neutral grassland and swamp communities. Small areas of fun rncadow ciccur in association with some of the remaining fen complcxcs. I Key Grassland Types: 1. Wet neutral grassland (MG11, MG13). 2. Fen meadow (M22, M24) Nationally Rare & Scarce Grassland Plant Spccics: Selinum cnwifolin Key sites: Chippenham Fen (part of Fenland pSAC), Ncnc Washes, Ouse Washes Associated interests: 1. Scmi-improvcd/revcrted wet neutral grassland (including coastal grazing marsh) and associated rare/scarce plant spocics 2. Swamp and fen communities which occur in a mosaic with wet grassland. 3. Brccding and wintering waders and wildfowl associated with wct grassland ('washes') I I Key Issues: 0 Hydrology - maintenancc of water tables and flooding rcgimcs Opportunities for grassland creation on farmland I 1 r I Key Objcctivcs: Maintain the current extent of semi-natural grassland in favourable cnnscrvation status Restore semi-natural grassland in sub-optimal condition to optimal condition Seek opportunities to expand the grassland resource I I 37 ll Natural area: 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk Downland Afforestion
    FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN No. 34 CHALK DOWNLAND AFFORESTATION By R. F. WOOD, B.A., B.Sc. and M. NIMMO FORESTRY COMMISSION LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 1EN SHILLINGS NET Forestry Commission ARCHIVE FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN No. 34 CHALK DOWNLAND AFFORESTATION By R. F. WOOD, B.A., B.SC., AND M. NIMMO FORESTRY COMMISSION LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 1 9 6 2 FOREWORD The substantial areas of chalk downs and wolds ments into the best methods to use, and the most which are found in the south and east of England suitable kinds of trees to plant, on chalk downs and include many tracks of land well suited to afforesta­ wolds undergoing afforestation for the first time. tion. But the peculiar characters of the bedrock and its superficial soils present many problems, which These trials, most of which are centred on Friston have occupied the attention of the Forestry Com­ Forest, near Eastbourne in Sussex, and Queen mission’s staff since it made its first acquisition of a Elizabeth Forest near Petersfield in Hampshire, have chalk downland area, at Friston Forest in Sussex, been continued ever since, and the main purpose of in 1927. The Commission has now (1961) over 30 this Bulletin is to present the findings to date. It also forests situated wholly or partly on chalk formations, includes an account of the characteristics of the scattered over the southern and eastern counties chalk country, a historical review of planting practice from Dorset to Kent and north to Yorkshire, while since 1808, and a discussion of the future prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment Report
    Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plan 2020-2025 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Report on the assessment of the Surrey Hills AONB Management Plan 2020-2025 in respect of the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats & Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) Draft for Consultation September 2019 (09-09-19) Statement of Purpose This Habitat Regulations Assessment report has been prepared by Surrey County Council’s Principal Environmental Assessment Officer, who is part of the Natural Environment & Assessment Team within the County Council’s Planning service. Planning is part of the Community Protection, Transport & Environment Directorate. The Surrey Hills AONB Office has commissioned the report, and the Habitat Regulations Assessment of which it forms the final output, as part of the review of the Surrey Hills AONB Management Plan for the period from 2020 to 2025. The report evaluates the extent to which the revised AONB Management Plan has the potential to give rise to ‘likely significant effects’ on Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) (and Ramsar Sites) within the Surrey Hills AONB and the surrounding area. The report is prepared in response to the requirements set out in the Conservation of Habitats & Species Regulations 2017 (Statutory Instrument 2017 No.1012) (as amended by The Conservation of Habitats & Species & Planning (Various Amendments) (England & Wales) Regulations 2018 (Statutory Instrument 2018 No.1307)). Statement of Limitations This report has been prepared for the sole use of the Surrey Hills AONB Office (“Client”). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report or any other services provided by the County Council’s Natural Environment & Assessment Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SAC
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary advice on conserving and restoring site features Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site Code: UK0012804 Box Hill. Photo © Ian Capper Date of Publication: 25 January 2019 Page 1 of 53 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site” This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Downs National Park
    Natural England Research Report NERR051 Assessing the potential consequences of climate change for England’s landscapes: the South Downs National Park www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR051 Assessing the potential consequences of climate change for England’s landscapes: the South Downs National Park Sarah Taylor1, Roger Matthews1, Nicholas Macgregor1, Nikki Van Dijk2, Geoff Darch2 and Andy Neale1 1Natural England 2Atkins Published on 02 September 2013 This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and re-use, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit www.naturalengland.org.uk/copyright. If any information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-029-7 © Natural England 2013 Project details This work was carried out in order to consider the vulnerability of the natural environment to climate change in the South Downs. It was undertaken by: Sarah Taylor, Roger Matthews, Nicholas Macgregor and Andy Neale from Natural England, and Nikki Van Dijk and Geoff Darch from Atkins. This report should be cited as: TALOR, S., MATTHEWS, R., MACGREGOR, N., VAN DIJK, N., DARCH, G. & NEALE, A. 2013. Assessing the potential consequences of climate change for England‟s landscapes: the South Downs National Park. Natural England Research Reports, Number 051. Project manager Andy Neale Block B Government Buildings, Whittington Road, Worcester, WR5 2LQ Tel: 0300 060 0403 [email protected] Acknowledgements Natural England would like to acknowledge the support of the South Downs Joint Committee and the South Downs National Park Authority, including the permission to use photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Today for Nature Tomorrow Impacts of Livestock Grazing On
    Impacts of livestock grazing on lowland heathland No. 422 - English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 422 Impacts of livestock grazing on lowland heathland in the UK Sophie Lake, James M Bullock and Sue Hartley NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and Sussex University You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2001 Executive summary General conclusions a. Grazing by livestock is an appropriate management for lowland heathland, to deliver conservation objectives. b. Management regimes using appropriate grazing can produce a greater diversity of habitats and thus a greater biological diversity than other management types such as burning or cutting. c. Grazing impacts must always be considered in terms of the intensity of grazing and the livestock types used; negative effects, or poor achievement of targets can arise from inappropriate grazing. The negative impacts of grazing on biodiversity over much of upland heathland in Britain illustrates the consequences of overgrazing. Summary 1. In recent years, grazing has been reintroduced to many UK (and European) lowland heaths, in an attempt to provide appropriate, sustainable conservation management. 2. To provide information to guide the use of livestock grazing on lowland heathlands, this report has the following objectives. a. To review and synthesise information on lowland heathland grazing history, methods and impacts. b. To obtain this information from published and unpublished literature, observation and anecdote from site managers, and ongoing research.
    [Show full text]
  • Epsom & Walton Downs Habitat Management Plan 2015-2020
    Epsom & Walton Downs Habitat Management Plan 2015-2020 1 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 2015-2020 Management Plan ............................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Background to previous plan .............................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Report Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Desk Top Research .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Management Review .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Chalk Grassland Rarity ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Rare Plants .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scrub Management for Conservation in Lowland England: Practices, Problems and Possibilities
    BTO Research Report No. 194 Scrub Management for Conservation in Lowland England: Practices, Problems and Possibilities Authors S.J. Gough & R.J. Fuller* * correspondence author A report by the British Trust for Ornithology to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee May 1998 © British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 British Trust for Ornithology Scrub Management for Conservation in Lowland England: Practices, Problems and Possibilities BTO Research Report No. 194 S.J. Gough & R.J. Fuller Published in May 1998 by the British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK Copyright © British Trust for Ornithology 1998 ISBN 0 903793 96 2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables ......................................................................................................................3 List of Appendices..............................................................................................................5 1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................7 2. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................9 2.1 The Scrub Debate.......................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Grassland Conservation. - *
    ENGLISH NATURE Lowland grassland Wildlife value and conservation status No. 169 - English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 169 Lowland grassland: wildlife value and conservation status R G Jeffersonand H J Robertson Grassland Ecologists Lowlands Team ISSN 0967-876X 0 Copyright English Nature 1996 Foreword Lowland semi-natural grassland is a resource of considerable nature conservation value in England. Many grassland types have also been identified as being of European significance and are listed on Annex 1of the EU Habitats and Species Directive. However, England's semi-natural grasslands are seriously threatened by changes in land use. This English Nature Research Report is intended to provide a compendium of information on the distribution, extent and conservation status of lowland grassland and associated species in England. The information will assist in the process of conserving and enhancing the remaining areas of this important wildlife resource, English Nature's Lowland Grassland Strategic Review and Action Plan (ENRR No, 163), which sets out detailed proposals to further grassland conservation, has already utilised the information in this report. The English Nature Action Plan is designed to help deliver the targets and goals for the conservation of lowland grassland formulated in 1995 by the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group. Contents 1. Introduction and definition ...................................... 1 2. Total extent of lowland grassland in England ............. 4 3. Types of lowland grasslands: distribution and extent *. 4 3.1 Neutral grasslands (NVC communities MG2.MG5, MGS. MGll and MG13 .................................... 4 3.2 Calcareous grasslands (CG1-CG9) ......................... 5 3.3 Acidic grasslands (Ul-U4) ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Guide to Surrey Heathland
    Summary Guide to Surrey Heathland An introduction to the heathland habitat and its management Surrey Heathland Project Heathland areas in Surrey In Surrey, heathland is largely confined to two National Character Areas: the Thames Basin Heaths (on Tertiary sands and gravels overlying the London Clay) in the north west of the county and the Wealden Greensand in the south west and centre. Additionally, there is some heathland (notably Headley Heath) on superficial gravels overlying the chalk in the North Downs National Character Area. Thames Basin Heaths Along with contiguous heathland in Hampshire and Berkshire, heathland in this part of Surrey amounts to approximately two thirds (about 2,000 hectares) of the county's surviving heathland. This forms a discontinuous band of sites from Epsom, Esher and Oxshott Commons in the east and westwards to the Ash Ranges Hampshire border. Heathland has also developed here on the Bagshot Beds and the Windlesham and Camberley Sand formations. The topography of these heaths is generally gentle and there are large areas of low- lying land supporting humid and wet heathland although, in places, steep hills support dry heath. Three sites, Ash Ranges, Pirbright Ranges and Chobham Common, account for three quarters of the heathland in the Thames Basin; nevertheless other smaller sites have considerable importance in maintaining biodiversity across the range of heathland within the National Character Area. Wealden Greensand Heathland on the Wealden Greensand makes up one third (about 1,000 hectares) of the county's heathland and forms part of a larger area extending into Hampshire and West Sussex. With the notable exception of Thursley National Nature Reserve and its environs (which supports an internationally important mire), the Wealden Greensand heaths are Thursley Common predominantly dry sites, lying on the Folkestone, Sandgate and Hythe Beds of the Lower Greensand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Chalk Grassland Communities and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
    The Structure of Chalk Grassland Communities and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Roy Anthony Holm 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Brighton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of the Environment and Technology University of Brighton Abstract Semi-natural chalk grassland is an internationally important habitat characterised by high species richness at a fine scale. In both the United Kingdom and other European Countries however, significant areas of chalk grassland have been lost to intensive agriculture practices. In the United Kingdom, conservation and expansion of existing chalk grassland sites has become a high priority. Research that leads to a better understanding of the processes that structure chalk grassland communities may aid these objectives. A number of field trials have been conducted to examine the role of grazing in structuring grassland plant communities, but the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)/plant symbiosis has received less attention. In this research project the structure (presence and abundance of species) of chalk grassland communities growing on the South Downs in the United Kingdom is defined. This is achieved by detailed analysis of extensive plant survey data collected in 1991. Analysis revealed strong patterns relating to species presence and abundance in the chalk grassland communities. In particular evidence of „nestedness‟ and a frequency abundance relationship was found. From these patterns it was deduced that AMF/ plant symbiosis may have a significant role in structuring chalk grassland communities. In the experimental component of this research project two separate, but connected, trials were conducted. In the first trial chalk grassland turf was sampled for study in the laboratory under controlled environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]