Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report Annual Report Rare Plant Monitoring Program Table of Contents 7 10 6 14 3 Editor’s Corner The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in 4 2019 Year in Review its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to 7 Muskroot Monitoring Finds New Population, Equal Opportunity Office, Refines Survey Timing Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. 10 Volunteers, Past Records Help Root Out Prairie Turnip Trends This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, audio tape. etc.) 12 upon request. Please call 608-261-6449 for Interviews: Volunteers Talk About Rare Plant more information. Monitoring Program Editor: Kevin Doyle 14 Graphic Design: Rebecca Rudolph Field Notes & Photos State of Wisconsin Department of Natural This program is supported with funds from the Natural Resources Box 7921 Resources Foundation’s Wisconsin Rare Plant Madison, WI 53707 Preservation Fund. Photo credit: Don Evans English sundew was re-located in Ashland County for the first time in 40 years. 2 Editor’s Corner Rare Plants by the Numbers 2,366 total plant taxa 344, or 14.5 percent are rare 72 listed as endangered 58 listed as threatened 192 listed as “special concern” meaning they are suspected to be in decline 6 federally listed plants • Northern monkshood (Aconitum noveboracense) • Dwarf lake iris (Iris lacustris) • Eastern prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) • Dune thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) • Prairie bush clover (Lespedeza leptostachya) • Fassett’s locoweed Photo credit: Ryan O’Connor (Oxytropis campestris var. Kevin Doyle records data for a rare plant survey. chartacea) 163 With a very high potential for extirpation from the state in hard-to-access spots like private Photo credit: Josh Mayer plants are endemic to land, military bases, or undeveloped 2 Fassett’s locoweed. Wisconsin, meaning they’re lakes. There is also a piece by a fellow found nowhere else in the RPMP volunteer on a more detailed world: Fassett’s locoweed and project to identify the best survey cliff cudweed. window for a small spring wildflower. The information RPMP volunteers By Kevin Doyle have collected documenting declines RPMP coordinator is now driving DNR efforts to reverse those trends. Whether hand As the Rare Plant Monitoring Program The Rare Plant Monitoring Program pollinating orchids to improve seed grows, so too does our impact on has always set out to address the first set, collecting seed from some of our the landscape. RPMP volunteers level of the conservation process: rarest plants for long-term storage, or visited more rare plant populations identifying if there is a problem. The working with local nurseries to grow in 2019 than any previous year, an next two levels, figuring out what is federally listed plants to reintroduce accomplishment that becomes more causing the problem and how to fix to the wild, there are things we are difficult and more impressive each it, can’t proceed without the basic doing to address biodiversity declines. year. And while volunteers located inventory work done in large part by These steps can only occur because 59 new rare plant populations, 63 RPMP volunteers. In fact, the Rare our team of rare plant monitors collect populations previously documented Plant Monitoring Program is the the information that tells us where to could not be found. Some of these largest source of rare plant data in direct our efforts. populations are only temporarily Wisconsin and unique in the Midwest submerged as many lakes experience for its breadth of surveys statewide. There’s no doubt there’s more work to their highest levels in decades. do, but I am so encouraged by how Unfortunately, others have likely In this report you’ll read highlights RPMP volunteers step up each year. A disappeared as part of a global trend of many of your surveys, major special thanks to all 2019 volunteers. in biodiversity loss. rediscoveries of rare plants not seen I look forward to working together in in decades, and populations located 2020. wiatri.net/inventory/rareplants/ 3 Thank You to our 2019 Volunteers! Photo credit: Dan Roberts Photo credit: Paul Hlina Photo credit: Clayton Frazer Photo credit: Don Evans Photo credit: Paul Doxsee Derek Anderson Greg Gardner Sherry Pethers Susan Archer Jesse Haack Lynn Preston Jan Axelson Heidi Hankley Corey Raimond Mike Baker Roberta Herschleb Cindy Reed Mary Bartkowiak Paul Hlina Bill Reichenbach Carrie Becker Eric Howe Jon Rigden Danielle Bell Sue Johanen-Mayoleth George Riggin Maureen Bogdanski Ben Johnston Gwendolyn Rouse Christine Bohn Zach Kastern Michael Roy Ben Bomkamp Courtney Kerns John Scholze Dan Buckler Debbie Konkel Quita Sheehan Aaron Carlson Jesse Koyen Ann Stoda Ryan Clemo Samantha Koyen Juniper Sundance Kathryn Corio Zach Kron Lucas Turpin Dave Czoschke Mark Lange Tanna Worrell Bill Dodge Brian Lennie Mary Zaander Paul Doxsee Sarah Majerus Jim Zipple Don Evans Kay McClelland Abby Zwicke Joan Fritzler Jason Miller Tom Ganfield Kerstyn Perrett wiatri.net/inventory/rareplants/ 4 2019 Year in Review Volunteers in 2019 produced collect alerts land managers to flower (Phemeranthus rugospermus) another great year for the Rare Plant pressing threats and informs on-the- population only to find the site was Monitoring Program. They visited ground management necessary to now a parking lot. Debbie Konkel 42 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties and maintain these known populations. set out to relocate one of the rarest submitted over 250 rare plant reports, Data are also used for statewide, plants in Wisconsin, silver bladderpod a new record! regional, and even international (Lesquerella ludoviciana), known status assessments and conservation from a single bluff prairie in Pierce Most exciting, volunteers’ discovered planning. County. She visited the site but found 59 populations of rare plants in new the upper part of the bluff where the locations. That more than doubles the Unfortunately, searching for but not plants were last seen was covered number found the previous year, and finding a rare plant population goes with brush. More surveys are planned every one of these new populations with the territory. Many of these for this summer to confirm that the helps provide another backstop species are declining and populations species has been extirpated from the against extinction for these rare plants can wink out for a variety of reasons, state. Brian Lennie visited a known in Wisconsin. including changes in habitat quality, white lady’s slipper (Cypripedium predation, inbreeding depression and candidum) site twice in May 2019. As usual, most volunteers were sent disease. In 2019, RPMP volunteers He found some high quality habitat out in 2019 to revisit known rare submitted 63 “negative” reports in hanging on but no orchids. Brian felt plant populations. These “check ups” which they could not find the species the site could still support a lady’s produced updated reports on 191 they were looking for. Though some slipper population and will give it known populations, helping us reduce of these negative reports are due to another try next year. In other cases, the number of rare plant populations high lake levels temporarily flooding plants were not found but there is that haven’t been visited in 20 years, suitable habitat or other reasons, hope for the future. and helping increase our awareness of it’s likely some of the populations rare plant health. And this awareness have winked out. Tanna Worrell Enjoy some highlights from the year. informs action. The data volunteers revisited a known prairie fame- English sundew (Drosera anglica) carnivorous plant species in was relocated in Ashland County Wisconsin. Like other sundews, it for the first time in over 40 years. is found in fens and bogs, harsh RPMP Volunteer Don Evans was environments that have forced kayaking with Judy, his wife, when plants to find other ways to get they saw some interesting sundews nutrients. and snapped some photos. The plants were hard to determine but English sundew has stalked glands seemed close enough to English across its leaves. Small insects are sundew that it was worth revisiting attracted to the sweet secretions the site. Since Don lives pretty far from these glands but become from Ashland County, we contacted trapped, gummed to the leaf the sundew Dr. Sarah Johnson at Northland surface by their stickiness. Soon can digest College in Ashland. She went to the more glands bend toward the its nutrients. site with some students in canoes ensnared prey, and the entire leaf Finally, the and confirmed the identity. This is curls around it, more like a boa nutrients from only the second extant population constrictor than a plant. Eventually the dead of this state threatened plant. A the insect dies from exhaustion or insect are great find and a cool example asphyxiation. absorbed of collaboration among DNR, through the volunteers, and academia. Although the glands’ secretions leaf surface are sweet, they are also corrosive and fuel plant English sundew is one of 15 and help break the prey down so growth. wiatri.net/inventory/rareplants/ 5 Ann Stoda and her husband, Doug, met with biologists at Fort McCoy in Monroe County Though the priority of the to try to find a number of rare RPMP is revisiting rare plant In 2019, RPMP volunteers found plants on the military base last populations on public land, 59 new rare plant populations. seen several decades ago. In there are some volunteers who Don Evans was one of these total, they searched for five visit private property because volunteers. He found the state species and found four of they have special access to it threatened ram’s head lady’s them. The couple relocated or are willing to do the extra slipper (Cypripedium arietinum) the state threatened dwarf work to get permission.
Recommended publications
  • Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Plant Tracking List
    OKLAHOMA NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY PLANT TRACKING LIST FAMILY UPDATED NAME COMMON NAME SRANK GRANK Acanthaceae Dyschoriste linearis (Torr. & A. Gray) Kuntze var. linearis polkadots S1T1 G4G5TNR Aizoaceae Sesuvium verrucosum Raf. winged sea purslane S1 G5 Alismataceae Alisma triviale Pursh northern water plantain S2 G5 Echinodorus tenellus (Mart.) Buchenau dwarf burhead SH G5? Sagittaria ambigua J.G. Sm. Kansas arrowhead S2 G2? Sagittaria cuneata E. Sheld. Wapatum arrowhead S2 G5 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus scleropoides Uline & W.L. Bray bone-bract pigweed SH G5 Chenopodium pallescens Standl. narrow-leaved goosefoot S1 G5 Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. aggregata Uline & W.L. Bray Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. densa Krascheninnikovia lanata (Pursh) A. Meeuse & A. Smit winterfat S1 G5 Suckleya suckleyana (Torr.) Rydb. poison suckleya S1 G5 Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis liriosme (Raf.) Shinners Texas spiderlily S2 G4? Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. northern spiderlily S1T1 GNRTNR eulae (Shinners) G. Lom. Sm. & Flory Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. S1T1 GNRTNR occidentalis northern spiderlily Anacardiaceae Cotinus obovatus Raf. American smoketree S2 G4 Rhus copallinum L. var. lanceolata A. Gray prairie sumac SNAT1 G5T4T5 Rhus microphylla Engelm. ex A. Gray little-leaved sumac S1 G4G5 Apiaceae Berula erecta (Huds.) Coville wild parsnip S2 G4G5 Bowlesia incana Ruiz & Pav. hoary bowlesia SH G5 Erigenia bulbosa (Michx.) Nutt. harbinger-of-spring S1 G5 Eryngium diffusum Torr. spreading eryngo SH G4? Eryngium hookeri Walp. Hooker's eryngo S1 G3G5 Eryngium integrifolium Walter blue-flower coyotethistle S1 G5 Perideridia americana (Nutt. ex DC.) Rchb. eastern eulophus S1 G4 Ptilimnium costatum Raf.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Biodiversity Atlas Plant List
    Kellogg Weaver Dunes SNA (Both Units) Plant List Herbarium Scientific Name Minnesota DNR Common Name Status Abutilon theophrasti velvet leaf Acer negundo box elder Acer saccharinum silver maple Achillea millefolium common yarrow Agalinis tenuifolia parviflora slender-leaved false foxglove Ageratina altissima altissima white snakeroot Agrimonia striata roadside agrimony Agrostis gigantea redtop Agrostis scabra rough bentgrass Amaranthus albus tumbleweed amaranth Amaranthus retroflexus retroflexus redroot amaranth Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Ambrosia psilostachya western ragweed Ambrosia trifida great ragweed Amelanchier interior inland juneberry Amorpha canescens leadplant Amorpha fruticosa false indigo Andropogon gerardii big bluestem Anemone canadensis canada anemone Anemone caroliniana Carolina thimbleweed Anemone cylindrica long-headed thimbleweed Anemone patens multifida pasqueflower Anemone virginiana alba tall thimbleweed Antennaria howellii neodioica Howell's pussytoes Antennaria neglecta field pussytoes Antennaria plantaginifolia plantain-leaved pussytoes Apocynum androsaemifolium spreading dogbane Aquilegia canadensis columbine Arabidopsis lyrata lyrata lyre-leaved rock cress Arctostaphylos uva-ursi bearberry Aristida basiramea base-branched three-awn Aristida tuberculosa seaside three-awn T Artemisia campestris caudata field sagewort Artemisia dracunculus tarragon Artemisia ludoviciana ludoviciana white sage Asclepias amplexicaulis clasping milkweed T Asclepias lanuginosa woolly milkweed Asclepias syriaca common milkweed
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the South Fork Native Plant Reserve, Van Buren County, Arkansas Theo Itw Sell Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, [email protected]
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 60 Article 23 2006 Vascular Flora of the South Fork Native Plant Reserve, Van Buren County, Arkansas Theo itW sell Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, [email protected] Brent Baker University of Central Arkansas Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Witsell, Theo and Baker, Brent (2006) "Vascular Flora of the South Fork Native Plant Reserve, Van Buren County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 60 , Article 23. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol60/iss1/23 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 60 [2006], Art. 23 Van Buren County, Arkansas 13' 2 Theo Witsell and Brent Baker i Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, 1500 Tower Building, 323 Center St., Little Rock, AR 72201 University ofCentral Arkansas, Department ofBiology,201 Donaghey Ave., Conway, AR 72035 3 Correspondence: [email protected] — Abstract. The South Fork Native Plant Preserve, a property owned and managed by the Gates Rogers Foundation, Inc., is located along the South Fork ofthe Little Red River (now Greers Ferry Lake) inVan Buren County, Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska
    Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska (Version IV – March 9, 2010) By Steven B. Rolfsmeier Kansas State University Herbarium Manhattan, KS 66506 and Gerry Steinauer Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Aurora, NE 68818 A publication of the NEBRASKA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION LINCOLN, NEBRASKA 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction..................................................................................… 1 Terrestrial Ecological System Classification…...................................................... 1 Ecological System Descriptions…………............................................................. 2 Terrestrial Natural Community Classification……………………………….….. 3 Vegetation Hierarchy………………………….………………………………… 4 Natural Community Nomenclature............................................................…........ 5 Natural Community Ranking..;……………….……….....................................…. 6 Natural Community Descriptions………….......................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Ecological Systems of Nebraska.………………………………… 10 Upland Forest, Woodland, and Shrubland Systems…………………………….. 10 Eastern Upland Oak Bluff Forest……….……………………………….. 10 Eastern Dry-Mesic Bur Oak Forest and Woodland……………………… 12 Great Plains Dry Upland Bur Oak Woodland…………………………… 15 Great Plains Wooded Draw, Ravine and Canyon……………………….. 17 Northwestern Great Plains Pine Woodland……………………………… 20 Upland Herbaceous Systems…………………………………………………….. 23 Central Tall-grass Prairie………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Flora Tour Introduction to Course Numbers of Families, Genera
    Vascular Flora of Wisconsin 20 January 2009 Wisconsin Flora Tour Introduction to course Numbers of families, genera and species within major groupings in Wisconsin Group Families Genera Species Species Total Native Introduced Cryptogams 13 31 112 0 112 Gymnosperms 3 8 15 2 17 Angiosperms Dicotyledons 115 575 1161 573 1734 Monocots 27 171 601 106 707 TOTAL 158 785 1889 681 2570 Largest families (50 or more taxa) and genera (15 or more taxa) in the Wisconsin flora Family No. of Taxa Genus No. of Taxa Asteraceae 373 Carex (sedge) 168 Poaceae 254 Aster (aster) 80 Cyperaceae 251 Rubus (raspberry) 55 Rosaceae 187 Crateagus (hawthorn) 47 Fabaceae 88 Viola (violet) 33 Brassicaceae 87 Panicum (panic grass) 32 Scrophulariaceae 75 Potamogeton (pondweed) 32 Lamiaceae 72 Salix (willow) 31 Caryophyllaceae 63 Polygonum (smartweed) 30 Orchidaceae 57 Solidago (goldenrod) 30 Ranunculaceaee 53 Juncus (rush) 29 Helianthus (sunflower) 20 Ranunculus (buttercup) 20 Chenopodium (chenopod) 19 Eleocharis (spikerush) 19 Lonicera (honeysuckle) 18 Veronica (veronica) 18 Rosa (rose) 16 Galium (bedstraw) 15 Source: Wisconsin State Herbarium (http://www.botany.wisc.edu/herbarium/) Four major floristic elements in the Wisconsin flora Boreal Alleghenian Ozarkian Prairie Two floristic provinces Northern hardwood Prairie forests Tension Zone Brief look at four plant communities Beech maple or southern mesic Oak forest or southern xeric Prairie Bog or fen Vascular Flora of Wisconsin 22 January 2009 Nomenclature and Vascular Cryptogams I Nomenclature vs. Classification Rank
    [Show full text]
  • 5/1/2020 Vascular Plants of Quivira NWR Page 1 Family Taxon Name Acanthaceae Ruellia Humilis Nutt. Adoxaceae Sambucus Nigra Ssp
    Vascular Plants of Quivira NWR 5/1/2020 Family Taxon name Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis Nutt. Adoxaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis (L.) R. Bolli Aizoaceae Sesuvium verrucosum Raf. Aizoaceae Trianthema portulacastrum Alismataceae Alisma triviale Pursh Alismataceae Echinodorus berteroi Alismataceae Sagittaria graminea ssp. Graminea Michx. Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia Willd. Amaranthaceae Amaranthus arenicola I.M. Johnst. Amaranthaceae Amaranthus graecizans L. Amaranthaceae Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson Amaranthaceae Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer Amaranthaceae Atriplex argentea Nutt. Amaranthaceae Atriplex dioica Raf. Amaranthaceae Atriplex patula L. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium album L. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium berlandieri Moq. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium glaucum L. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium leptophyllum (Moq.) Nutt ex. S. Watson Amaranthaceae Chenopodium pratericola Rydb. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium rubrum L. Amaranthaceae Chenopodium simplex (Torr.) Raf. Amaranthaceae Cycloloma atriplicifolium (Spreng.) J.M. Coult. Amaranthaceae Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants Amaranthaceae Froelichia floridana (Nutt.) Moq. Amaranthaceae Froelichia gracilis (Hook.) Moq. Amaranthaceae Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Amaranthaceae Salicornia rubra A. Nelson Amaranthaceae Salsola tragus L. Amaranthaceae Suaeda calceoliformis (Hook.) Moq. Amaranthaceae Suckleya suckleyana (Torr.) Rydb. Amaryllidaceae Allium canadense var. fraseri Ownbey Amaryllidaceae Allium sativum Anacardiaceae Rhus aromatica Aiton Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra L. Anacardiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Records in the Platte and Loup River Bottomlands of Platte County, Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 2008 Floristic Records in the Platte and Loup River Bottomlands of Platte County, Nebraska Michael P. Gutzmer New Century Environmental LLC, [email protected] Robert B. Kaul University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Gutzmer, Michael P. and Kaul, Robert B., "Floristic Records in the Platte and Loup River Bottomlands of Platte County, Nebraska" (2008). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 33. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2008. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 31: 15-29 FLORISTIC RECORDS IN THE PLATTE AND LOUP RIVER BOTTOMLANDS OF PLATTE COUNTY, NEBRASKA Michael P. Gutzmer New Century Environmental LLC Columbus, Nebraska 68601-6335 and Robert B. Kaul University of Nebraska State Museum Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0514 ABSTRACT land-use disturbances continue at a rapid rate, bottomland floras are now more diverse, A recent inventory of vascular plants in the Loup heterogeneous mixes of plants than in presettlement and Platte riverbottoms in Platte County has greatly times.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
    Glossary abiotic—Pertaining to nonliving things. canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas layer, in a vegetative stand; mid-level or under- and activities for people of different abilities, story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy especially those with physical impairments. closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the adaptive resource management—The rigorous appli­ amount of overhead vegetative cover. cation of management, research, and monitoring CCC—See Civilian Conservation Corps. programs to gain information and experience nec­ CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. essary to assess and change management activi­ CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. ties; a process that uses feedback from research, cfs—Cubic feet per second. monitoring programs, and evaluation of manage­ Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC)—Peacetime civilian ment actions to support or change objectives and “army” established by President Franklin D. Roo­ strategies at all planning levels; a process in sevelt to perform conservation activities from which policy decisions are carried out within a 1933–42. Activities included erosion control; fire­ framework of scientifically driven experiments to fighting; tree planting; habitat protection; stream test predictions and assumptions inherent in man­ improvement; and building of fire towers, roads, agement plan. Analysis of results helps managers recreation facilities, and drainage systems. decide whether current management should con­ Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of tinue as is or whether it should be modified to the general and permanent rules published in the achieve desired conditions. Federal Register by the executive departments Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge Sys­ and agencies of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecturehandouts.Pdf
    Vascular Flora of Wisconsin Short Tour of the Wisconsin Flora Introduction to course Numbers of families, genera and species within major groupings in Wisconsin Group Families Genera Species Species Total Native Introduced Seed-free vascular plants 13 31 112 0 112 Gymnosperms 3 8 15 2 17 Angiosperms 142 746 1762 679 2441 TOTAL 158 785 1889 681 2570 Largest families (50 or more taxa) and genera (15 or more taxa) in the Wisconsin flora [Source: Wisconsin State Herbarium (http://www.botany.wisc.edu/herbarium/)] Family No. of Taxa Genus No. of Taxa Asteraceae (asters) 373 Carex (sedge) 168 Poaceae (grasses) 254 "Aster" (aster) 80 Cyperaceae (sedges) 251 Rubus (raspberry) 55 Rosaceae (roses) 187 Crateagus (hawthorn) 47 Fabaceae (legumes) 88 Viola (violet) 33 Brassicaceae (mustard) 87 Panicum (panic grass) 32 "Scrophulariaceae" Potamogeton (pondweed) 32 (snapdragons) 75 Salix (willow) 31 Lamiaceae (mints) 72 "Polygonum" (smartweed) 30 Caryophyllaceae Solidago (goldenrod) 30 (pinks) 63 Juncus (rush) 29 Orchidaceae (orchids) 57 Helianthus (sunflower) 20 Ranunculaceaee Ranunculus (buttercup) 20 (buttercups) 53 Chenopodium (chenopod) 19 Eleocharis (spikerush) 19 Lonicera (honeysuckle) 18 Veronica (veronica) 18 Rosa (rose) 16 Galium (bedstraw) 15 1 Major floristic elements in the Wisconsin flora Alleghenian Ozarkian Prairie Boreal Western Coastal Plain Two floristic provinces Northern hardwood Prairie forests Tension Zone Border of two floristic provinces Major plant communities Southern mesic (basswood/maple) forest Southern xeric (oak/hickory) forest Southern hydric (floodplain) forest Northern mesic (northern hardwood) forest Northern xeric (pine/oak) forest Northern hydric (conifer swamp) forest Prairie Bog Fen Sedge meadow Aquatic Weed 2 Vascular Flora of Wisconsin Nomenclature and Seed-free Vascular Plants I Nomenclature vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aizoales 3-663.20.00
    Aizoales 3-663.20.00 Taxonomy Introduction In the Apg2 classifcation Te suborder is recognised with Lo- Tey have a tendency to give a lot in order to be accepted. Tey phiocarpaceae, Barbeuiaceae, Aizoaceae, Gisekiaceae, Nyctag- want to belong to the group, the family and in order to do so inaceae, Phytolaccaceae and Sarcobataceae. they have a tendency to adapt, to give in. Because they are high- ly sensitive they accurately feel what the others want and need Plant theory and can easily adapt to that. It is only when they feel placed In the Plant theory the above clade is given the name Aizoales. outside of the group that they can become angry. It feels like a Aizoales is placed in Phase 2 of the Caryophyllidae. basic need of life to be accepted but it is difcult for them to feel In the frst version the above Families were placed in the sever- completely accepted as their inner life is ofen felt as peculiar al Subphases. and strange. Tey feel weird in a strange world. Tey feel very In Plant theory 2 only Aizoaceae is lef inPhase 2. religious, a connection with the spiritual world and God and Te other Families are transferred toPhase 3. that connection is ofen not very well accepted in society. Due to their inner convictions they can get in confict with society. Subphases Mostly their solution is to keep their opinions and feelings to 1. Sesuvioideae Aizoaceae themselves; they prefer to avoid the conficts. Tey hope to be 2. Drosanthemoideae Aizoaceae be able to stay with their own inner convictions and that they 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered, Threatened, Watch List and Extirpated Plants of Indiana
    Page 1 of 19 05/14/2021 Endangered, Threatened, Watch List and Extirpated Plants of Indiana Species Name Common Name GRANK SRANK FEDERAL STATE Acalypha deamii Deam's two-seeded mercury G4? S4 WL Aconitum uncinatum blue monkshood G4 S1 SE Acorus americanus sweetflag G5 S3? WL Actaea racemosa black bugbane G3G4 S4 WL Actaea rubifolia Appalachian bugbane G3 S1 SE Actaea rubra ssp. rubra red baneberry G5T5 S1? ST Adlumia fungosa climbing fumatory G4 SX SX Aesculus octandra yellow buckeye G5 S3? WL Agalinis auriculata earleaf foxglove G3 S2 ST Agalinis fasciculata clustered foxglove G5 S4S5 WL Agalinis gattingeri roundstem foxglove G4 S3 ST Agalinis skinneriana pale false foxglove G3G4 S2 ST Agrostis scabra rough bentgrass G5 S3? WL Alnus incana ssp. rugosa speckled alder G5T5 S3? WL Amelanchier humilis running serviceberry G5 S1 SE Ammophila breviligulata Marram grass G5 S2 WL Anaphalis margaritacea pearly everlasting G5 SX SX Andersonglossum boreale northern wild comfrey G5T4T5 SX SX Andromeda glaucophylla bog rosemary G5T5 S2 ST Andropogon ternarius silver bluestem G5 S4? WL Androsace occidentalis western rockjasmine G5 S2 ST Anemone caroliniana Carolina anemone G5 SX SX Antennaria solitaria single-head pussytoes G5 S4? WL Anticlea elegans var. glaucus white camas G5T4T5 S3 ST Arabis patens spreading rockcress G3 S1 SE Aralia hispida bristly sarsaparilla G5 S1 SE Arctostaphylos uva-ursi bearberry G5 S3 ST Arethusa bulbosa swamp-pink G5 SX SX Aristida longespica var. geniculata slim-spike three-awn grass G5T5? S3 WL Aristida tuberculosa seabeach
    [Show full text]