Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Glossary abiotic—Pertaining to nonliving things. canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas layer, in a vegetative stand; mid-level or under- and activities for people of different abilities, story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy especially those with physical impairments. closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the adaptive resource management—The rigorous appli­ amount of overhead vegetative cover. cation of management, research, and monitoring CCC—See Civilian Conservation Corps. programs to gain information and experience nec­ CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. essary to assess and change management activi­ CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. ties; a process that uses feedback from research, cfs—Cubic feet per second. monitoring programs, and evaluation of manage­ Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC)—Peacetime civilian ment actions to support or change objectives and “army” established by President Franklin D. Roo­ strategies at all planning levels; a process in sevelt to perform conservation activities from which policy decisions are carried out within a 1933–42. Activities included erosion control; fire­ framework of scientifically driven experiments to fighting; tree planting; habitat protection; stream test predictions and assumptions inherent in man­ improvement; and building of fire towers, roads, agement plan. Analysis of results helps managers recreation facilities, and drainage systems. decide whether current management should con­ Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of tinue as is or whether it should be modified to the general and permanent rules published in the achieve desired conditions. Federal Register by the executive departments Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge Sys­ and agencies of the Federal Government. Each tem Administration Act of 1966. volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar alternative—A reasonable way to solve an identified year. problem or satisfy the stated need (40 CFR compatibility determination—See compatible use. 1500.2); one of several different means of accom­ compatible use—A wildlife-dependent recreational plishing refuge purposes and goals and contribut­ use or any other use of a refuge that, in the sound ing to the Refuge System mission (Draft Service professional judgment of the Director of the U.S. Manual 602 FW 1.5). Fish and Wildlife Service, will not materially amphibian—A class of cold-blooded vertebrates interfere with or detract from the fulfillment of including frogs, toads or salamanders. the mission of the Refuge System or the purposes annual—A plant that flowers and dies within 1 year of the refuge (Draft Service Manual 603 FW 3.6). of germination. A compatibility determination supports the choice ATV—All-terrain vehicle. of compatible uses and identified stipulations or baseline—A set of essential observations, data, or limits necessary to make sure that there is information used for comparison or a control. compatibility. biological control—The use of organisms or viruses comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)—A document to control invasive plants or other pests. that describes the desired future conditions of the biological diversity, also biodiversity—The variety of refuge and provides long-range guidance and life and its processes, including the variety of liv­ management direction for the refuge manager to ing organisms, the genetic differences among accomplish the purposes of the refuge, contribute them, and the communities and ecosystems in to the mission of the Refuge System, and to meet which they occur (Service Manual 052 FW 1.12B). other relevant mandates (Draft Service Manual The National Wildlife Refuge System’s focus is on 602 FW 1.5). indigenous species, biotic communities, and eco­ concern—See issue. logical processes. conspecific—An individual belonging to the same biotic—Pertaining to life or living organisms; species as another. caused, produced by, or comprising living cool-season grasses—Grasses that begin growth organisms. earlier in the season and often become dormant in the summer. These grasses will germinate at 196 Draft EA—Quivira National Wildlife Refuge, Kansas lower temperatures. Examples of cool-season fauna—All the vertebrate and invertebrate animals grasses at the refuge are western wheatgrass, of an area. needle and thread, and green needlegrass. Federal trust resource—A trust is something man­ coteau—A hilly upland including the divide between aged by one entity for another who holds the own­ two valleys; a divide; the side of a valley. ership. The Service holds in trust many natural cover, also cover type, canopy cover—Present vegeta­ resources for the people of the United States of tion of an area. America as a result of Federal acts and treaties. cultural resources—The remains of sites, structures, Examples are species listed under the Endan­ or objects used by people in the past. gered Species Act, migratory birds protected by depredation—Destruction or consumption of eggs, international treaties, and native plant or wildlife broods, or individual wildlife because of a preda­ species found on a national wildlife refuge. tory animal; damage inflicted on agricultural Federal trust species—All species where the Federal crops or ornamental plants by wildlife. Government has primary jurisdiction including drawdown—The act of manipulating water levels in federally endangered or threatened species, an impoundment to allow for the natural, cyclical migratory birds, anadromous fish, and certain drying out of a wetland. marine mammals. EA—See environmental assessment. flora—All the plant species of an area. ecosystem—A dynamic and interrelating complex of FMP—fire management plan. plant and animal communities and their associ­ forb—A broad-leaved, herbaceous plant; a seed-pro­ ated nonliving environment; a biological commu­ ducing annual, biennial, or perennial plant that nity, with its environment, functioning as a unit. does not develop persistent woody tissue but dies For administrative purposes, the Service has down at the end of the growing season. designated 53 ecosystems covering the United fragmentation—The alteration of a large block of States and its possessions. These ecosystems gen­ habitat that creates isolated patches of the origi­ erally correspond with watershed boundaries and nal habitat that are interspersed with a variety of their sizes and ecological complexity vary. other habitat types; the process of reducing the EIS—Environmental impact statement. size and connectivity of habitat patches, making emergent—A plant rooted in shallow water and hav­ movement of individuals or genetic information ing most of the vegetative growth above water between parcels difficult or impossible. such as cattail and hardstem bulrush. Friends group—Any formal organization whose mis­ endangered species, Federal—A plant or animal spe­ sion is to support the goals and purposes of its cies listed under the Endangered Species Act of associated refuge and the National Wildlife Ref­ 1973, as amended, that is in danger of extinction uge Association overall; Friends organizations throughout all or a substantial part of its range. and cooperative and interpretive associations. endangered species, State—A plant or animal species General Schedule—Pay rate schedule for certain in danger of becoming extinct or extirpated in a Federal positions. Sometimes “GS.” particular state within the near future if factors geographic information system (GIS)—A computer contributing to its decline continue. Populations of system capable of storing and manipulating spa­ these species are at critically low levels or their tial data; a set of computer hardware and soft­ habitats have been degraded or depleted to a sub­ ware for analyzing and displaying spatially stantial degree. referenced features (such as points, lines and endemic species—Plants or animals that occur natu­ polygons) with nongeographic attributes such as rally in a certain region and whose distribution is species and age. relatively limited to a particular locality. GIS—See geographic information system. environmental assessment (EA)—A concise public goal—Descriptive, open-ended, and often broad document, prepared in compliance with the statement of desired future conditions that con­ National Environmental Policy Act, that briefly veys a purpose but does not define measurable discusses the purpose and need for an action and units (Draft Service Manual 620 FW 1.5). alternatives to such action, and provides sufficient grassland tract—A contiguous area of grassland evidence and analysis of effects to decide whether without fragmentation. to prepare an environmental impact statement or habitat—Suite of existing environmental conditions finding of no significant impact (40 CFR 1508.9). required by an organism for survival and repro­ EPA—Environmental Protection Agency. duction; the place where an organism typically extinction—The complete disappearance of a species lives and grows. from the earth; no longer existing. habitat disturbance—Substantial alteration of habitat extirpation—The extinction of a population; complete structure or composition; may be natural (for eradication of a species within a specified area. Glossary 197 example, wildland fire) or human-caused events migratory birds—Birds that follow a seasonal move­ (for example, timber harvest and disking). ment from their breeding grounds to their winter­ habitat type, also vegetation type, cover type—A land ing grounds. Waterfowl,
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Lincoln County Official Directory
    Table of Contents Federal Government Executive .................................................................................... 1 Legislative ................................................................................... 1 State Government Executive .................................................................................... 1 Legislative ................................................................................... 2 County Government County Elected & Judicial Officials ............................................... 2 County Departments & Personnel ............................................3-9 County Board of Supervisors ..................................................... 10 County Board Members by District ............................................ 12 County Board Committees ........................................................ 14 County Department Heads-Titles & Email Addresses ............ 38-39 Tomahawk Annex……………………………………………………………………….41 Listing of School Districts……………………………………………………………….9 City Government Merrill ....................................................................................... 18 Tomahawk ................................................................................ 20 Town Officers Town ........................................................................................ 22 Town Officials ...................................................................... 23-30 Who to Contact When you Want to Know About .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • VP MIKE PENCE at the GOP Convention Site in Charlotte, NC
    Aug 24, 2020 View in browser B Y JAKE SHERMAN , ANNA PALMER , GARRETT ROSS A N D E L I O K U N Presented by THE MESSAGE? … VP MIKE PENCE at the GOP convention site in Charlotte, N.C.: “We’re going to make America great again -- again.” Republicans officially nominated President DONALD TRUMP and PENCE for a second term today. THE PRESIDENT visited the site early this afternoon. “Think about your life just prior to the plague," he told the crowd. This week’s schedule and speakers THIS MORNING WAS YET ANOTHER PIECE OF EVIDENCE for the legion of political observers who believe some high-profile congressional hearings turn out to be a waste of time. MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE spent the morning lecturing Postmaster General LOUIS DEJOY about the USPS -- oftentimes without asking a single question. When they asked questions, they sometimes sounded like this: Do you believe you need to follow the law? Is your backup plan to be pardoned like Roger Stone, Rep. JIM COOPER (D-Tenn.) asked? Why are the Democrats out to get you, Rep. JIM JORDAN (R-Ohio) queried? Why doesn’t this hearing about the USPS include debate about the PPP -- it’s a “waste of time,” Rep. CHIP ROY (R-Texas) said. In addition, the hearing was riddled with technical difficulties. REP. STEPHEN LYNCH (D-Mass.) asked if DEJOY would replace removed sorting machines -- DEJOY said no, but they couldn’t get around to figuring out why, because LYNCH had used up all of his time. MEANWHILE, millions of Americans are wondering if their prescription drugs are going to get delivered, if their mail-in votes will actually be counted and what elected officials are actually doing to make their lives better in the middle of a pandemic and economic recession.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Phyciodes Butterfly Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): Complex Mtdna Variation and Species Delimitations
    Systematic Entomology (2003) 28, 257±273 Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations NIKLAS WAHLBERG*, RITA OLIVEIRA* andJAMES A. SCOTTy *Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Finland, and yLakewood, Colorado, U.S.A. Abstract. Mitochondrial DNA variation wasstudied in the butterfly genus Phyciodes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) by sequencing 1450 bp of the COI gene from 140 individuals of all eleven currently recognized species. The study focused on four species in particular that have been taxonomically difficult for the past century, P. tharos, P. cocyta, P. batesii and P. pulchella. A cladistic analysis of ninety-eight unique haplotypesshowedthat Phyciodes formsa monophyletic group with P. graphica as the most basal species. Of the three informal species groupsdescribed for Phyciodes, only one (the mylitta-group) isunambiguously monophyletic. Within the tharos-group, seven well supported clades were found that correspond to three taxa, P. tharos, P. pulchella and a grade consisting of P. cocyta and P. batesii haplotypesinterdigitated with each other. None of the clades is formed exclusively by one species. The patterns of haplotype variation are the result of both retained ancient polymorphism and introgression. Introgression appearsto be mostcommon between P. cocyta and P. batesii; however, these two species occur sympatrically and are morphologically and ecologically distinct, suggesting that the level of current introgression does not seem to be enough to threaten their genetic integrity. The results indicate that mitochondrial DNA sequences must be used with great caution in delimiting species, especially when infraspecific samples are few, or introgression seems to be rampant.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ambitious New Plan Offers Delta Water and Economic Hope for the San Joaquin Valley
    August 12, 2020 Western Edition Volume 2, Number 30 An ambitious new plan offers Delta water and economic hope for the San Joaquin valley The San Joaquin Valley is bracing for the economic impacts to come from implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act over the next 20 years. Without changes, the regulation could lead to more than a million acres of fallowing and as much as $7 billion in lost revenues every year, with the worst financial impacts rippling down to California’s most disadvantaged communities, according to a report released earlier this year. With this reality, a coalition has emerged around a complex and ambitious approach to bring water to the valley, one that could head off the A new plan takes a different approach to Delta water flows. (Photo of the Sacramento Delta, courtesy of the Department of Water worst effects of SGMA for farmers, the Resources) environment and communities. “We've already started,” said Scott Hamilton, an agricultural economist who works as a consultant for the coalition known as the Water Blueprint for the San Joaquin Valley. “But it’s a process that's going to take quite a bit of time and is fairly difficult.” During a Fresno State seminar series on water infrastructure on Tuesday, Hamilton outlined a sweeping new approach that would pull excess flows from the Delta through a fish-friendly alternative to pumping, then funnel that water through new extensions to existing canals and store it using strategic groundwater recharge projects. “None of it is cheap,” warned Hamilton. “We are now looking at around a $9-billion program for the valley.” 1 He acknowledged the success of the plan hinges on one critical leap of faith: gaining approval from environmental and social justice groups to pull more water from the Delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Usapp – American Politics and Policy Blog: Trump's Intransigence Won't
    USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog: Trump’s intransigence won’t change the election result. But it’s still dangerous for security and democracy. Page 1 of 2 Trump’s intransigence won’t change the election result. But it’s still dangerous for security and democracy. Despite the 2020 presidential election being called for now President-elect Joe Biden on Saturday, President Trump has refused to concede, and many in his administration are actively working to obstruct the transition to the Biden administration. Julie Norman writes that the actions of Trump and his enablers may have real consequences for the security of the country, and risk causing long lasting damage to many Americans’ trust in the electoral system. Trump’s refusal to concede the 2020 presidential election shouldn’t come as a surprise, and President-Elect Biden’s team is right to project calm, de-escalate the tension, and push forward with transition plans. While Trump is within his rights to request recounts in states within certain thresholds, these are not expected to change any outcomes, and all claims of widespread voter fraud remain unsubstantiated with multiple lawsuits already thrown out. But even if it’s acknowledged by many across the political spectrum that the outcome of the election won’t change, his intransigence does raise significant concerns for American democracy and security. It is tempting to see Trump’s tweets and comments as pure noise and bluster. As one Trump senior aide commented, there is seemingly little harm in humouring Trump for this period before the electoral votes are counted by Congress on 14 December.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Plant Tracking List
    OKLAHOMA NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY PLANT TRACKING LIST FAMILY UPDATED NAME COMMON NAME SRANK GRANK Acanthaceae Dyschoriste linearis (Torr. & A. Gray) Kuntze var. linearis polkadots S1T1 G4G5TNR Aizoaceae Sesuvium verrucosum Raf. winged sea purslane S1 G5 Alismataceae Alisma triviale Pursh northern water plantain S2 G5 Echinodorus tenellus (Mart.) Buchenau dwarf burhead SH G5? Sagittaria ambigua J.G. Sm. Kansas arrowhead S2 G2? Sagittaria cuneata E. Sheld. Wapatum arrowhead S2 G5 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus scleropoides Uline & W.L. Bray bone-bract pigweed SH G5 Chenopodium pallescens Standl. narrow-leaved goosefoot S1 G5 Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. aggregata Uline & W.L. Bray Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. densa Krascheninnikovia lanata (Pursh) A. Meeuse & A. Smit winterfat S1 G5 Suckleya suckleyana (Torr.) Rydb. poison suckleya S1 G5 Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis liriosme (Raf.) Shinners Texas spiderlily S2 G4? Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. northern spiderlily S1T1 GNRTNR eulae (Shinners) G. Lom. Sm. & Flory Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. S1T1 GNRTNR occidentalis northern spiderlily Anacardiaceae Cotinus obovatus Raf. American smoketree S2 G4 Rhus copallinum L. var. lanceolata A. Gray prairie sumac SNAT1 G5T4T5 Rhus microphylla Engelm. ex A. Gray little-leaved sumac S1 G4G5 Apiaceae Berula erecta (Huds.) Coville wild parsnip S2 G4G5 Bowlesia incana Ruiz & Pav. hoary bowlesia SH G5 Erigenia bulbosa (Michx.) Nutt. harbinger-of-spring S1 G5 Eryngium diffusum Torr. spreading eryngo SH G4? Eryngium hookeri Walp. Hooker's eryngo S1 G3G5 Eryngium integrifolium Walter blue-flower coyotethistle S1 G5 Perideridia americana (Nutt. ex DC.) Rchb. eastern eulophus S1 G4 Ptilimnium costatum Raf.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Systematics of Phyciodes (Phyciodes)
    cf#']i:z 10 Feb. 20, 1998 PAPILIO ~ $4.00 - ..- ·-- .. -· - ~- - PHYCIODES (PHYCIOD£S): N£W DISCOVERIES, NEW SUBSPECIES, AND comf£R6ENCE by DR. JAMES A. SCOTT 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Abstract. The paper presents new discoveries in Phyciodes (Phyciodes ). New life history information is given for P. mylitta arizonensis, P. pallida pallida, P. pallida barnesi, P. tharos tharos, P. cocyta selenis, P. cocyta dimin'utor, P. batesii lakota, P. b. apsaalooke, P. b. anasazi, P. pulchella camillus, and P. picta picta. P. batesii anasazi was found to significantly converge toward P. cocyta in western Colorado in appearance of some adults larvae and pupae, and P. cocyta selenis from the same area was found to converge a little toward anasazi in adult wing pattern and larval head pattern, so some individuals of these two tax.a are difficult to distinguish. The nomenclatural identity of P. tharos form marcia is clarified. Five new subspecies are named: P. tharos orantain has orange antenna nudum and is somewhat intermediate between P. tharos tharos and P. cocyta. P. cocyta diminutor is multivoltine with late-flying summer generations that are small like P. tharos, and might possibly even be a separate species from the sympatric univoltine larger P. cocyta selenis. P. pulchella deltarufa has oranger ups than ssp. pulchella. P. pulchella owimba differs from ssp. pulchella by having an orange antenna nudum and some different wing pattern details. P. phaon jalapeno has paler median ups bands. INTRODUCTION Scott (1994) reported on the systematics and biology of Phyciodes (Phyciodes), described numerous new life histories, named five new tax.a, and corrected prior nomenclature.
    [Show full text]