DOCSLIB.ORG

Dataset Attributes (Excel Spreadsheet Column Names)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 Metadata - Current Taxonomy of South Australian Vascular Plants for BDBSA (accompanies the VascularPlants_BDBSA_Taxonomy.xls spreadsheet) This document describes the excel spreadsheet VascularPlants_BDBSA_Taxonomy.xls available as a download from the Biodiversity Information Management page of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Internet Website: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/science/bio-information/how-do-i-provide.html The spreadsheet is a list of the vascular plant names that are currently deemed acceptable for entry into the Biological Databases of South Australia (BDBSA). As well as plant names accepted by the State Herbarium as current taxonomy for the Census of South Australian Vascular Plants the list also contains other allowable records for the BDBSA, for example where the full identification of a species (sp.) is not possible and only genus level can be accurately recorded (e.g. Atriplex sp.). Also, where a species has more than one subspecies (ssp.) there are records available that allow for the entry of the genus and species without having to identify to the ssp. level (e.g. Atriplex vesicaria ssp.). This list does not contain synonyms (superseded or misapplied names). To obtain a list of current plant names with their synonyms visit the Census of South Australian Plants, Algae and Fungi website [http://www.flora.sa.gov.au/census.shtml] . From the Census website you are able to print preformatted lists or produce comma separated data to load into spreadsheets etc. Data has been extracted from the FLORA database (a taxonomic reference system for Department of Environment and Natural Resources Biological Databases of SA). Due to the ongoing revision of both taxonomic description and conservation status there may be errors or omissions in the data provided and this list will change over time. The list will be updated periodically with the latest taxonomy so it is advised that users regularly download updated copies of the data to ensure they have the most recent taxonomic list. The date of last update will be indicated on the website and within the spreadsheets. For further information regarding this Flora Taxonomic list please contact: DENR, Science Resource Centre Environmental Information Standards Group Flora Officer Ph: (08) 8222 9447 [email protected] Dataset Attributes (Excel Spreadsheet Column Names) TAXONOMIC SORT ORDER This is a numeric field that enables the list to be sorted into an order that follows the flow of the taxonomic classification system adopted by the State Herbarium. This field will be generated each time the file is updated and should not be used to store information against as the number will change. MAJORGROUP High level taxonomic classification. FAMILYNAME Taxonomic classification to Family level. NSXCODE Alpha numeric code for each taxonomic entity (species) in the BDBSA database. The code is important to retain as it is used to allow taxonomy to be updated as changes occur. This code is unique only within the Flora list and may be repeated in the Vertebrate list. SCIENTIFIC NAME Taxonomic species name (Genus and species epithet combined). Page 2 COMMON NAME The non-scientific name by which the plant is known. NPWSA ACT STATUS State conservation status as listed in the National Parks and Wildlife Schedules (E= Endangered, V= Vulnerable, R= Rare). See Schedules 7, 8 and 9 at the end of the National Parks and Wildlife Act webpage [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/npawa1972247/] for further information. Note: An asterisk in this field is used to flag cases where it is known that the application of the status requires qualification in some way. See Appendix 1. South Australian Conservation Status information at the end of this document for further detail on the species involved. EPBC ACT STATUS National conservation status of the species according to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999. (EX = Extinct, CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable). See following website for further information. [http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicthreatenedlist.pl?wanted=flora] Note: An asterisk in this field is used to flag cases where it is known that the application of the status requires qualification in some way. See Appendix 1. Australian Conservation Status information at the end of this document for further detail on the species involved. INTRODUCED Introduced (exotic or non-indigenous native) species are flagged in this field with an asterisk *. A blank entry signifies the species is indigenous to South Australia. TERMS and CONDITIONS The data is provided by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) on the following basis: (a) All copyright and other intellectual property rights remain vested in the Crown in right of South Australia. (b) The user is only entitled to use and reproduce the data in unpublished or published reports provided due acknowledgment of the source is given. (c) Use of the Information is at the user's own risk and all liability or responsibility to the user or to any other person is expressly disclaimed by DENR. (d) DENR give no warranty that the data is accurate or fit for any particular purpose of the user or any person to whom the user discloses the information. (e) Use, adaptation or reproduction of the Information contrary to any of these conditions is prohibited and any use which constitutes any infringement of copyright renders the Licensee liable to prosecution under the provisions of the Copyright Act (1968)(Cth). Page 3 Appendix 1 Conservation Status Information AUSTRALIAN CONSERVATION STATUS (AUS) The status designations provided are based on the current (as at March 2007) listing of species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Please note that the FLORA and Census outputs only provide a guide to designations of status under this Act which should be consulted directly where certainty is required. EX Extinct CR Critically Endangered EN Endangered VU Vulnerable Note that there is no Rare category under the EPBC Act. * An asterisk is used to flag cases where it is known that the application of the status requires qualification in some way. The following are currently identified as needing qualification. SPECIES EPBC status Comment on EPBC listing Caladenia sp. Southeast (RBates 66283) EN* Split from Caladenia arenaria Correa calycina var. calycina VU* 16 Jul 00 listed as Correa calycina Correa calycina var. halmaturorum VU* 16 Jul 00 listed as Correa calycina Hypolepis dicksonioides 25 Nov 03 listed as established alien for SA in Census and thus status application is inappropriate. However there are some who regard the VU* species as indigenous in SA. Senecio helichrysoides EX* 16 Jul 00 as Senecio georgianus SOUTH AUSTRALIAN CONSERVATION STATUS (SA) The codes are based on Schedules of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (SA) as amended in 21.2.2008. Please note that FLORA and Census outputs only provide a guide to status under this Act, and there are discrepancies and omissions that result from differences in taxonomy and nomenclature. Often new names in the FLORA database (from which this taxonomic list and Census are derived) may not have been applied yet to the schedules. Sometimes the reverse situation has applied. Where certainty is required, the schedules should be consulted directly to determine official designations under the NPWS Act. E Endangered (Schedule 7, Part 2) (Note that there is no category specifically for species that are presumed to be extinct. Instead these are included in the Endangered category.) V Vulnerable (Schedule 8, Part 2) R Rare (Schedule 9, Part 2) * An asterisk is used to flag cases where it is known that the application of the status requires Page 4 qualification in some way. The following are currently identified as needing qualification. NPW SPECIES status Comment on NPW listing Asperula sp. A (A.B.Cashmore E* extinct, Apr 2007 September 1933) Botrychium australe E* [PJL: extinct] Brachyscome decipiens E* not evaluated [PJL: extinct?] Caladenia audasii E* needs investigation Caladenia concolor E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007 Caladenia hastata N* extinct, updated from null to E, Apr 2007; updated on schedules (in error) from E to null, Sep 2007, PJL updated in FLORA: E* to N* (actually extinct) Caladenia sp. Bordertown E* extinct (R.S.Rogers 788) Caladenia sp. Finniss (R.Bates 308) E* extinct Caladenia versicolor E* extinct, updated V to E Apr 2007 Caladenia xanthochila E* extinct Diuris punctata var. punctata E* extinct Eucalyptus conglobata ssp. R* equivalent (name mismatch: NPW Act name without ssp. conglobata) conglobata Euphrasia scabra E* extinct, updated X to E, Apr 2007 Galium leiocarpum E* [extinct] Gentianella clelandii E* extinct, updated V to E, Apr 2007 Grevillea angustiloba ssp. E* updated null to E*, Sep 2007 ( Error in correction of NPW schedule - E status should apply to ssp. wirragensis only). Grevillea angustiloba ssp. E* CR B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii), updated null to E, Apr 2007 (SCHEDULE ERROR! angustiloba Status should apply to ssp. wirregaensis instead). Removed CR working status. Lepidium hyssopifolium N* [extinct] Lepidium monoplocoides E* [extinct] Prasophyllum litorale E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007 Prasophyllum rotundiflorum E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007 Pterostylis maxima E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007 Pterostylis sp. Eyre Peninsula V* updated V* to V, Sep 2007 (R.Bates 19474) Pterostylis sp. Hale (R.Bates V* VU A2a;C2a(i);D2, updated null to V, Apr 2007, (name mismatch: NPW 21725) Act name as Pt. sp.Veined leaf (R.J.Bates 59781) Pterostylis sp. Triloba (pl.191, E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007, equivalent (name mismatch: NPW Act Bates & Weber 1990) name uses 'and' instead of '&') Senecio helichrysoides E* extinct Swainsona sericea E* [extinct] Thelymitra aristata E* extinct, updated null to E, Apr 2007 Thelymitra ixioides E* extinct, updated null to E Thelymitra lucida N* Needs assessment due to taxonomic split.
Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia

    Native Orchid Society of South Australia

    NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 6, No. 10, November, 1982 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. SBH 1344. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Mr J.T. Simmons SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 4 Gothic Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue STONYFELL S.A. 5066 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 32 5070 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven COMMITTFE: Mr R. Shooter Mr P. Barnes TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mrs A. Howe Mr R. Markwick EDITOR: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven NEXT MEETING WHEN: Tuesday, 23rd November, 1982 at 8.00 p.m. WHERE St. Matthews Hail, Bridge Street, Kensington. SUBJECT: This is our final meeting for 1982 and will take the form of a Social Evening. We will be showing a few slides to start the evening. Each member is requested to bring a plate. Tea, coffee, etc. will be provided. Plant Display and Commentary as usual, and Christmas raffle. NEW MEMBERS Mr. L. Field Mr. R.N. Pederson Mr. D. Unsworth Mrs. P.A. Biddiss Would all members please return any outstanding library books at the next meeting. FIELD TRIP -- CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE The Field Trip to Peters Creek scheduled for 27th November, 1982, and announced in the last Journal has been cancelled. The extended dry season has not been conducive to flowering of the rarer moisture- loving Microtis spp., which were to be the objective of the trip. 92 FIELD TRIP - CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE (Continued) Instead, an alternative trip has been arranged for Saturday afternoon, 4th December, 1982, meeting in Mount Compass at 2.00 p.m.
  • Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017

    Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017

    1 Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 web: www.austplants.com.au/Armidale e-mail: [email protected] Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Winter Edition 2020 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2017 ......p1 Editorial …...p2Error! Bookmark not defined. New Website Arrangements .…..p3 Solstice Gathering ......p4 Passion, Boers & Hibiscus ......p5 Wollomombi Falls Lookout ......p7 Hard Yakka ......p8 Torrington & Gibraltar after fires ......p9 Small Eucalypts ......p12 Drought tolerance of plants ......p15 Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Vacant Vice President: Colin Wilson Secretary: Penelope Sinclair Ph. 6771 5639 [email protected] Treasurer: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Membership: Phil Rose [email protected] 2 Markets in the Mall, Outings, OHS & Environmental Officer and Arboretum Coordinator: Patrick Laher Ph: 0427327719 [email protected] Newsletter Editor: John Nevin Ph: 6775218 [email protected],net.au Meet and Greet: Lee Horsley Ph: 0421381157 [email protected] Afternoon tea: Deidre Waters Ph: 67753754 [email protected] Web Master: Eric Sinclair Our website: http://www.austplants.com.au From the Editor: We have certainly had a memorable year - the worst drought in living memory followed by the most extensive bushfires seen in Australia, and to top it off, the biggest pandemic the world has seen in 100 years. The pandemic has made essential self distancing and quarantining to arrest the spread of the Corona virus. As a result, most APS activities have been shelved for the time being. Being in isolation at home has been a mixed blessing.
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
  • American River, Kangaroo Island

    American River, Kangaroo Island

    TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT REPORT Appendices A to I & K to L Issued September 2016 CONTENTS A. Infrastructure & Services Report (BCA Engineers) B. Native V egetation Assessment (Botanical Enigmerase) C. Landscape Concept Plan (Botanical Enigmerase) D. Fauna Assessment (Envisage Environmental) E. Archeological and Heritage Assessment (K. Walshe) N.B. This report is to be updated - it contains incorrect information regarding location of Plaque & Anchor F. Design Review 1 Letter (ODASA) G. Noise Assessment (Sonos) H. Stormwater Management (fmg Engineers) I. DR Guidelines (Development Assessment Commission) K. Draft CEMMP & OEMMP (PARTI) L. Traffic Impact Assessment ( infraPlan) - - - - - NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPOSED KANGAROO ISLAND RESORT AMERICAN RIVER CITY AND CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT (CCD) HOTEL AND RESORTS LLC 31 AUGUST 2016 BOTANICAL ENIGMERASE Michelle Haby- 0407 619 229 PO Box 639 Daniel Rowley- 0467 319 925 Kingscote SA 5223 ABN- 59 766 096 918 [email protected] NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 31 August 2016 Citation: Haby, M and Rowley, D.J. (2016) Native Vegetation Assessment and Landscape Plan- Proposed American River Resort. Internal report to City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC. This report was researched and prepared by Botanical Enigmerase Email: [email protected] in accordance with the agreement between, on behalf of and for the exclusive use of City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC 2800 156th Avenue SE Suite 130 Bellevue, WA 98007 [email protected] Michelle Haby is a Native Vegetation Council accredited consultant, accredited to prepare data reports for clearance consent under Section 28 of the Native Vegetation Act 1991 and applications made under one of the Native Vegetation Regulations 2003.
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Recovery Plan for Twelvve Threatened Spider-Orchid Caledenia R. Br. Taxa

    Recovery Plan for Twelvve Threatened Spider-Orchid Caledenia R. Br. Taxa

    RECOVERY PLAN for TWELVE THREATENED SPIDER-ORCHID CALADENIA R. Br. TAXA OF VICTORIA AND SOUTH AUSTRALIA 2000 - 2004 March 2000 Prepared by James A. Todd, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria Flora and Fauna Statewide Programs Recovery Plan for twelve threatened Spider-orchid Caladenia taxa of Victoria and South Australia 2000-2004 – NRE, Victoria Copyright The Director, Environment Australia, GPO Box 636, Canberra, ACT 2601 2000. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or other, without the prior permission of the Director, Environment Australia. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this document are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Environment Australia, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria, the Department of Environment and Heritage, South Australia or Parks Victoria. Citation Todd, J.A. (2000). Recovery Plan for twelve threatened Spider-orchid Caladenia taxa (Orchidaceae: Caladeniinae) of Victoria and South Australia 2000 - 2004. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne. The Environment Australia Biodiversity Group, Threatened Species and Communities Section funded the preparation of this Plan. A Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity
  • Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists

    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists

    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists 0 Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists FOREWORD This document fills a significant gap in the Tasmanian orchid literature. Given the inherent difficulties in locating and surveying orchids in their natural habitat, an accurate guide to their flowering times will be an invaluable tool to field botanists, consultants and orchid enthusiasts alike. Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists has been developed by Tasmania’s leading orchid experts, drawing collectively on many decades of field experience. The result is the most comprehensive State reference on orchid flowering available. By virtue of its ease of use, accessibility and identification of accurate windows for locating our often-cryptic orchids, it will actually assist in conservation by enabling land managers and consultants to more easily comply with the survey requirements of a range of land-use planning processes. The use of this guide will enhance efforts to locate new populations and increase our understanding of the distribution of orchid species. The Threatened Species Section commends this guide and strongly recommends its use as a reference whenever surveys for orchids are undertaken. Matthew Larcombe Project Officer (Threatened Orchid and Euphrasia) Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment March 2008 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY This document is available as a PDF file downloadable from the following websites: www.fpa.tas.gov.au www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au www.ecotas.com.au It may also be requested directly from the authors (see contact details below).
  • White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland And

    White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland And

    NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Conservation Assessment of White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Mark Tozer and Christopher Simpson 22/06/2020 NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Name: White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Short Name: Box – Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Grassland Distribution: Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and Australian Capital Territory Bioregions: NSW North Coast, New England Tableland, Nandewar, Brigalow Belt South, Sydney Basin, South Eastern Highlands, NSW South Western Slopes Bioregions, South East Queensland and Victorian Midlands Bioregions Current EPBC Act Status: Critically Endangered Current NSW BC Act Status: Endangered Proposed listing on NSW BC Act and EPBC Act: Critically Endangered Summary of Conservation Assessment White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland was found to be eligible for listing as Critically Endangered under Criteria A3 and D3. The main reasons for this Ecological Community being eligible are that it has undergone a very large historical reduction in geographic distribution (since approximately 1750) and has experienced disruption of biotic processes of relative severity >90% over more than 90% of its distribution since 1750. Description White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland comprises an aggregation of Grassy Woodlands (sensu Keith 2004) occurring on the tablelands and western slopes of the Great Diving Range from the Darling Downs in southern Queensland south to central Victoria. In NSW, the community corresponds broadly with Keith’s (2004) Western Slopes Grassy Woodlands, Southern Tableland Grassy Woodlands and New England Grassy Woodlands classes.
  • E29695d2fc942b3642b5dc68ca

    E29695d2fc942b3642b5dc68ca

    ISSN 1409-3871 VOL. 9, No. 1—2 AUGUST 2009 Orchids and orchidology in Central America: 500 years of history CARLOS OSSENBACH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY LANKESTERIANA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY Copyright © 2009 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Effective publication date: August 30, 2009 Layout: Jardín Botánico Lankester. Cover: Chichiltic tepetlauxochitl (Laelia speciosa), from Francisco Hernández, Rerum Medicarum Novae Hispaniae Thesaurus, Rome, Jacobus Mascardus, 1628. Printer: Litografía Ediciones Sanabria S.A. Printed copies: 500 Printed in Costa Rica / Impreso en Costa Rica R Lankesteriana / International Journal on Orchidology No. 1 (2001)-- . -- San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001-- v. ISSN-1409-3871 1. Botánica - Publicaciones periódicas, 2. Publicaciones periódicas costarricenses LANKESTERIANA i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Geographical and historical scope of this study 1 Political history of Central America 3 Central America: biodiversity and phytogeography 7 Orchids in the prehispanic period 10 The area of influence of the Chibcha culture 10 The northern region of Central America before the Spanish conquest 11 Orchids in the cultures of Mayas and Aztecs 15 The history of Vanilla 16 From the Codex Badianus to Carl von Linné 26 The Codex Badianus 26 The expedition of Francisco Hernández to New Spain (1570-1577) 26 A new dark age 28 The “English American” — the journey through Mexico and Central America of Thomas Gage (1625-1637) 31 The renaissance of science
  • South East Flora

    South East Flora

    Regional Species Conservation Assessments DENR South East Region Complete Dataset for all Flora Assessments Dec 2011 In Alphabetical Order of Species Name MAP ID FAMILY NAME PLANT FORM NSX CODE SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME SOUTH EAST Regional EAST SOUTH Status Regional EAST SOUTH Status Score Regional Trend EAST SOUTH Score Regional EAST SOUTH Status+Trend Score SOUTH EAST Regional Trend EAST SOUTH FAMILY FAMILY NUMBER (CENSUS OF SA) EPBCACTSTATUSCODE NPWACTSTATUSCODE LASTOBSERVED_in_SE TOTAL_in_SA TOTAL_in_SE %_SOUTH_EAST_REGION EofO_in_SE_All_km2 EofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 AofO_in_SE_All_km2 AofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 711 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Y01536 Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 2009 814 60 7.37 3000 1700 48 27 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 712 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01545 Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga-bush 2001 563 18 3.20 800 500 16 9 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 713 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01554 Acacia continua Thorn Wattle 1974 836 1 0.12 100 1 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 714 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05237 Acacia cupularis Cup Wattle 2002 577 83 14.38 4700 1500 65 20 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 716 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01561 Acacia dodonaeifolia Hop-bush Wattle R 2002 237 33 13.92 800 400 19 6 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 718 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01562 Acacia enterocarpa Jumping-jack Wattle EN E 2008 92 16 17.39 700 400 10 7 VU 4 0 0.3 4.3 719 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05985 Acacia euthycarpa Wallowa 1992 681 7 1.03 500 100 7 1 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 720 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes S01565 Acacia farinosa Mealy Wattle 1997 325 88 27.08 4000 1600 65 23 NT 2 0 0.3 2.3 721 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE