Afghan Refugees Camp Population in KP March, 2018

Copy Link

SOLUTION STRATEGY UNIT COMMISSIONERATE AFGHAN REFUGEES KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR March, 2018 CAMP WISE AFGHAN REFUGEES POLULATION IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA S/No Name of District Name of Admn Camp Cluster Camps Population FAM IND 1 Kababian 2,3 764 4194 Kababian Michani/Warsak 30 196 2 Badaber 2840 14438 3 Khazana Khazana / Wahid Gari 921 4434 4 Naguman 410 2437 5 Khurasan 376 2259 Mere Kachori, Zandai 541 3400 6 Peshawar Mera Kachori Baghbanan 2149 9770 7 Shamshatoo Gul Badin, Old/ Molvi Khalid 3631 18817 Sub-Total Peshawar 11662 59945 8 Utmanzai 535 3268 Munda - I-II 1007 5099 9 Munda Ekka Gund 363 1471 10 Hajizai 501 2880 Sub-total Charsadda 2406 12718 Charsadda Akora Khattak Akora new, Hawai, 4509 22606 11 Kheshki 210 1710 12 Khairabad Khairabad 1926 9239 13 Turkaman Turkaman/Jalozai 410 2820 Nowshera Sub-Total Nowshera 7055 36375 14 Lakhti Banda 294 2085 Kata Kani 1000 6007 15 Kata Kani Kotki 297 2054 Kahi-I-II 1020 7937 16 Kahi Doaba 46 1165 17 Darsamand I-II 1640 10916 Hangu 18 Thall Thall-I-II 1270 12035 Sub-Total Hangu 5567 42199 19 Gamkol Gamkol -I-II-III 4932 30713 Oblen 1338 8081 20 Oblen Jarma 375 1067 Ghulam Banda 1021 6208 21 Ghulam Banda Shin Dhand 236 1426 22 Chichana 611 3901 Sub-Total Kohat 8513 51396 23 Jalala Jalala 1,2,3 1496 8187 Baghicha 481 2743 24 Baghicha Kagan 249 1352 Mardan Sub-Total Mardan 2226 12282 25 Barakai 2013 12606 Barakai Fazal 810 2731 26 Gandaf 2823 18226 Swabi Sub-Total Swabi 5646 33563 27 Zangal Patai 696 4125 Sub-Total Malakand 696 4125 Malakand Kohat Koga 1680 7972 28 Buner Sub-Total Buner 1680 7972 29 Chakdara 1725 11836 30 Timer 1402 10501 31 Toor Toor, Mayar 410 2485 32 Barawal Barawal 37 442 DIR Dodba 28 141 Sub-Total Dir 3602 25405 kessu 161 1049 Kalkatak Domshogoor/ Urghich 32 168 33 Kalkatak 121 670 Chitral Sub-Total Chitral 314 1887 34 Khaki 1626 9178 35 Ichrian 528 3173 Bareri 823 4922 36 Mansehra Sub-Total Mansehra 2977 17273 37 Bizen Khel 310 1728 Bizen Khel Kurram Gari 102 562 Sub-Total Bannu 412 2290 Bannu Gandi K.Khel 544 2896 Naurang 266 1334 Gandi Khan Khel 38 Lakki Gambila 425 2170 Sub-Total Lakki 1235 6400 Panian 1 , 4188 23089 39 Panian Panian 2 6204 34974 40 Basu Mera Haripur Padhana 1339 7659 41 Sub-Total Haripur 11731 65722 Dabara 441 2444 42 Sub-Total Tank 441 2444 Tank Zafarabad 505 2814 Ratta Kulachi 331 1812 Pashapul 335 1842 Zafarabad 43 Girsal D.I.Khan 244 1332 Zandani 347 1874 Sub-TotalD.I.Khan 1762 9674 Grand Total (43) 67925 391670 Approximatly Registered Population of AR out side camps Families Individuals 51798 256320 Approximately registered Afghan population - Urban areas Families Individuals Mardan 2333 9401 Swabi 2078 10050 Malakand 868 3094 Buner 1705 7165 Total 6984 29710 Bannu 672 1100 Lakki 735 1512 Total 1407 2612 Haripur 3781 20327 Mansehra 2900 17161 Total 6681 37488 Chitral 889 4836 G Total 15961 74646 Unregister Afghan population - Urban areas Families Individuals Chitral 110 1054 Unregister Afghan population - Camps Families Individuals Chitral 74 465 Timer(Dir) 35 222 Note: Azakhel camp handed over to DC Nowshera. Only 261 families consisting of 1470 individuals are still residing in camp Kheshki ( Cluster Azakhel camp) 12134 ARfamilies families ( PoR Carf holders) consisting 58069 individuals shifted to uknown places on their own choices (November).

Recommended publications

The Haqqani Network in Kurram the Regional Implications of a Growing Insurgency

May 2011 The haQQani NetworK in KURR AM THE REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A GROWING INSURGENCY Jeffrey Dressler & Reza Jan All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ©2011 by the Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project Cover image courtesy of Dr. Mohammad Taqi. the haqqani network in kurram The Regional Implications of a Growing Insurgency Jeffrey Dressler & Reza Jan A Report by the Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project ACKNOWLEDGEMENts This report would not have been possible without the help and hard work of numerous individuals. The authors would like to thank Alex Della Rocchetta and David Witter for their diligent research and critical support in the production of the report, Maggie Rackl for her patience and technical skill with graphics and design, and Marisa Sullivan and Maseh Zarif for their keen insight and editorial assistance. The authors would also like to thank Kim and Fred Kagan for their necessary inspiration and guidance. As always, credit belongs to many, but the contents of this report represent the views of the authors alone. taBLE OF CONTENts Introduction.....................................................................................1 Brief History of Kurram Agency............................................................1 The Mujahideen Years & Operation Enduring Freedom .............................. 2 Surge of Sectarianism in Kurram ...........................................................4 North Waziristan & The Search for New Sanctuary.....................................7
Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan

February 2002 Vol. 14, No. 2(G) AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, AND PAKISTAN CLOSED DOOR POLICY: Afghan Refugees in Pakistan and Iran “The bombing was so strong and we were so afraid to leave our homes. We were just like little birds in a cage, with all this noise and destruction going on all around us.” Testimony to Human Rights Watch I. MAP OF REFUGEE A ND IDP CAMPS DISCUSSED IN THE REPORT .................................................................................... 3 II. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 III. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 6 To the Government of Iran:....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 To the Government of Pakistan:............................................................................................................................................................... 7 To UNHCR :...............................................................................................................................................................................................
List of Province-Wise Quarantine Facilities Sr Locations

LIST OF PROVINCE-WISE QUARANTINE FACILITIES SR LOCATIONS BEDS Islamabad 1. Hajji Camp 300 2. Pak-China Friendship Centre 50 Total 350 Balochistan 1. Turkish Colony, District Jaffarabad 50 2. Midwifery School, District Naseerabad 50 3. DHQ Hospital Kachi 50 4. Boys Highschool Gandawah, District Jhal Magsi 50 5. Boys Highschool Digri, District Sohbatpur 50 6. Sheikh Khalif Bin Zayed Hospital, District Quetta 56 7. Gynae & General Private Hospital, District Quetta 24 8. Customs House Taftan 17 9. Taftan Quarantine 4,950 10. PCSIR Laboratory Compound 600 Total 5,897 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 1. Landi Kotal, District Khyber 102 2. Darazinda, District Dera Ismail Khan 200 3. Peshawar 500 4. Gomal Medical College, District Dera Ismail Khan 200 5. RHC Dassu, District Kohistan 2 6. RHC Shetyal, District Kohistan 2 7. GHSS Boys, District Mohmand 20 8. GHS Ekkaghund, District Mohmand 30 9. Hostel Bahai Daag AC Complex, District Mohmand 20 10. DHQ Hospital Nursing Hostel, District Bajaur 30 11. Type D Hospital Nawagai, District Bajaur 30 12. Type D Hospital Larkhalozo, District Bajaur 60 13. Post Graduate College, District Bajaur 50 14. Degree College Nawagai, District Bajaur 50 15. Degree College Barkhalozo, District Bajaur 50 16. Bachelor Hostel Daag Qilla, District Bajaur 20 17. BHU Dehrakai, District Bajaur 10 18. RHC Arang, District Bajaur 10 19. GHS Khar No-2, District Bajaur 20 20. Govt. Degree College Wari, District Dir Upper 55 21. Govt. Degree College, District Dir Upper 35 22. Govt. Technical College, District Nowshera 50 23. Govt. Post Graduate College, District Nowshera 100 24. GHSS Khairabad, District Nowshera 20 25.
25 January 2013)

1213297 [2013] RRTA 91 (25 January 2013) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 1213297 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2012/141724 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Pakistan TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Amanda Goodier DATE: 25 January 2013 PLACE OF DECISION: Perth DECISION: The Tribunal remits the matter for reconsideration with the direction that the applicant satisfies s.36(2)(a) of the Migration Act. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant who claims to be a citizen of Pakistan applied to the Department of Immigration for the visa on [date deleted under s.431(2) of the Migration Act 1958 as this information may identify the applicant] June 2012. 3. The delegate refused to grant the visa [in] August 2012, and the applicant applied to the Tribunal for review of that decision. RELEVANT LAW 4. Under s.65(1) a visa may be granted only if the decision maker is satisfied that the prescribed criteria for the visa have been satisfied. The criteria for a protection visa are set out in s.36 of the Act and Part 866 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). An applicant for the visa must meet one of the alternative criteria in s.36(2)(a), (aa), (b), or (c). That is, the applicant is either a person in respect of whom Australia has protection obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as amended by the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (together, the Refugees Convention, or the Convention), or on other ‘complementary protection’ grounds, or is a member of the same family unit as a person in respect of whom Australia has protection obligations under s.36(2) and that person holds a protection visa.
75190 Caswaname 13/06/02 16:20 Side 270

75190 Caswaname 13/06/02 16:20 Side 270 South-West Asia Major Developments For the first months of 2001, Afghanistan continued to experience the devastating effects of drought, human rights abuses, and continued conflict between the Taliban and Northern Alliance. Prior to September, attempts by the United Nations and donor governments to bring the warring Afghan factions to the negotiating table had failed. Despite this, some 21,000 refugees returned from Pakistan with UNHCR assistance. They were mostly Pashtuns who said they were going back to Afghanistan because they could no longer afford to live in Pakistan, where employment opportunities were becoming increasingly rare, and because they feared being deported. At the same time, more than 140,000 Afghans returned spontaneously from the Islamic Republic of Iran, without seeking assis- tance from UNHCR. Others, however, continued to flee to neighbouring countries in search of assistance. The Islamic Afghanistan Republic of Iran and Pakistan, meanwhile, adopted Islamic Republic of Iran a closed border policy and deported Afghans who Pakistan did not have the required travel documents. 75190 Caswaname 13/06/02 16:20 Side 271 South-West Asia South-West In the spring, in an apparent bid to deter Afghans ble cases to enter the country, authorising UNHCR from entering Pakistan, the Government of to establish a pre-registration camp near the border Pakistan stopped transferring newly arrived at Chaman, and to move new arrivals to new camps Afghans from a makeshift camp at Jalozai, where conditions were very bad, to more suitable Persons of Concern to UNHCR locations. Following an intervention by the UN Secretary General, a visit by the High Commis- Mln.
Jalozai Camp Nowshera District- Photograph by Syed Haider Ali

Floods in Pakistan Pakistan Health Cluster Bulletin No 6 5 August, 2010 Out -patient consultation in a static clinic operating in Nowshera district-Photo by Syed Haider Ali-WHO-EHA Highlights: Around 1.6 million people have been affected overnight in Punjab. A multi cluster rapid assessment mission (MCRAM) has commenced on 5 August. Infrastructure damage is hampering access to public health facilities in multiple locations in Khyber Paktunkhwa. The flood waters continue to destroy South of Punjab while heavy rains crippled lives in upper Sindh. One alert of acute watery diarrhea was reported from Chendangari village of FR Peshawar area where 70 patients have been reported so far though unconfirmed sources WHO, Government and Health Cluster partners are continuing the health response and struggling to reach communities and individuals in areas which are inaccessible. Situation Overview and Current Scope of Disaster Exact figures of deaths are still not clear but at least over 1,500 people have lost their lives with over a thousand injured. Initial findings of a WFP assessment suggest that some 250,000 families or 1.8 million people would be in need of assistance in KPK alone. These figures may rise as more areas are becoming accessible. The number of flood affectees in Punjab province is reported to be nearly 1.4 million people. According to UNOCHA some 4 million people have been affected due to country wide floods in Pakistan. Currently the flood wave of Indus River is in Muzaffargarh district (Southern Punjab) and after devastating Kot Addu town, it has entered Kot Mithon.
IVAP Analysis Report April 2015

IVAP Analysis Report April 2015 IVAP is proudly funded by ECHO and DFID Background to KP/FATA Complex Emeregency The Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) is a semi-autonomous tribal region in northwestern Pakistan. It borders Afghanistan as well as Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan provinces. More than 5 million people have been registered with the government and/or UNHCR as an internally displaced person (IDP) at some point since 2008 due to violent clashes in the country’s northwest region made up of FATA and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. The 2014 military operations in North Waziristan and Khyber Agencies aggravated the situation, leading to the displacement of a further 233,000 families (approximately 1.4 million people). According to latest estimates from the UNHCR (2014), there are currently 1.6 million registered IDPs in KP/FATA. The vast majority of IDPs in KP/FATA chose to live in host communities (97%) rather than in camps for cultural reasons, including the privacy of females and difficult living conditions in the camps. The rest, who often have no other option, live in IDP camps (3%) (WFP). OCHA and other sources put the proportion of displaced families living outside of camps at 90% (OCHA, 18 June 2014; NYT, 20 June 2014; Al-Jazeera, 26 June 2014; IDMC, 12 June 2013, p.6). Displacement is difficult in Pakistan, which is ranked 146th on the list of 186 countries covered by the Human Development Index (UNDP, 24 July 2014, p.159). An estimated one fifth of its population are poor across the country, while in the KP/FATA a staggering one third of the population are poor (FDMA/UNDP, 2012, p.5; HDR, 2013, p.18; HPG, May 2013, p.21; UNDP, 27 October 2011).
Union Council Level

Southern K.P. Districts- Union Council Level Sher Kot Urban-4 Chorlaki Usterzai Bahadar Kot 2 Muhammad Zai Urban-3 Urban-1 Nusrat Khel Urban-2 Urban-5 Kech Banda Raisan Togh Bala Urban-6 Khan Bari Darband Ganjiano Shah Pur Kalli Bahadar Kot 1 Billitang Gumbat Sur Gul Naryab Kharmatu Khushal Garh Kahi Kotki Jarma Tora Warai Hangu Togh Serai Darsamand Dhoda Doaba HA N G U Kohat Lachi Rural Mandoori Thall Rural Muhammad Khawja Lachi Urban KO H A T Sudal Thall Urban Karbogha Dallan Gurguri Teri Jatta Ismail Khil Banda Daud Shah Empty Shakardara Urban Shakardara Nari Panos Bahadur Khel Sabir Abad Mittha Khel Karak Karak Rehmat Abad KA R A K Esak Chuntra Latambar Ghundai Mir.k.khel Chukara Dabli Aral Hathi Khel Warana Lalozai Sikandar Dand Shaho Khel Bala Kha Amandi Umar Khan 1 Asperka Wazir Ahmad Abad Chagarmash Kheli Mu Nizam Darma Khel Baloch Amandi Umar Shahbaz Azmat Khel 1 Khan 2 Hinjal Takhat Nasrati Khawaja Karab Kalli Baka Khel Muhammad Khan WazirMad Mandan Shahbaz Azmat Khel 2 Thatti Nasrati Mitta Killa Khel Masti Khel Khel Jhando Khel Jehangiri Mandew Mira Khel B A NN U Mandan Shaamshi Khel Nurar Bharat Zargar Mama Khel Azim Killa Bannu Khojary Bannu Ghoriwala Lewan Dardariz Sharawah Kaki Landidak Nar Jafar Khan Mama Khel. Jani Khel Lalozai Sikandar Khel Bala Kha Mash Masti Khani Dand Shaho Asperka Wazir Tikhtee Khel. Marmandi Azeem. Amandi Umar Khan 1 Ghundi Khan Khel. Chagarmash Kheli Mu Kot Kashmir Nizam Darma Khel Baloch Landiwah Kachi Kamar Muhammad Khan Wazir Shahbaz Azmat Khel 1 Baist Khel Amandi Umar Khan 2 Bakhmal Ahmaed Zai LA K K I Hinjal Dharka Soliman Khel Shahbaz Azmat Khel 2 MA R W A T Khawaja Mad Mandan Jhando Khel Tajazai Baka Khel Mitta Khel Killa Khel Masti Khel Pahar Khel Thal Behram Khel Mira Khel Kharu Khel Pacca Lakki Marwat Bego Khel.
Jalozai Camp. 155 Bajaur IDP Families Comprising of 630 Individuals Have Returned from Jalozai Camp on 21-04-12All Mohmand Agency Idps Returned on 18-04-12

WHO Emergency Humanitarian Program Situation Report Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA Week 16 Date: April 15-21, 2012 1. Situation around IDP hosting districts A: Situation in “Jalozai” IDP camp, Nowshera district WHO regularly shares updates on the disease situation and latest situation on the newly influx of IDPs of Jalozai IDP camp with health cluster partners on district, provincial and national levels. WHO along with health cluster partners, UNICEF and provincial health authorities lead the emergency health response for the newly displaced IDPs in Jalozai camp and living in host communities in District Nowshera. Total registered IDPs families are 53590 out of which 10857 are residing in Jalozai IDP camp & 42733 are living in off camp. 131 Bajaur IDP families comprising of 837 Individuals have been shifted from Benazir to Jalozai Camp. 155 Bajaur IDP families comprising of 630 Individuals have returned from Jalozai Camp on 21-04-12All Mohmand Agency IDPs Returned on 18-04-12. CAMP organization new health post in phase 7 is ready and functioning from Monday, 16th April. A total of 5 alerts including 4 measles and 1 AFP were reported and responded in this week. There were 3,368 consultations provided through health care provider, including acute respiratory infection (20% or 678 cases), acute diarrhea (9% or 291 cases), skin infection (2% or 59) and suspected malaria (1% or 28 cases). Health & WASH cluster meetings take place on every Monday and Thursday in Jalozai Camp attended by partners from Health (Merlin, CAMP, CERD, UNICEF), WASH, Nutrition, Food and CCM clusters working in the camp where issues are discussed and decisions are taken on the spot to address any loop holes in the health response for containment and control of disease outbreaks in the camp.
Pakistan: Over Burdened Health Facilities with Influx of Idps in Host Communities of Hangu District, NWFP Province DRAFT

Pakistan: Over burdened health facilities with influx of IDPs in host communities of Hangu district, NWFP Province DRAFT Orakzai Agency Shahoo Khel 17,170 16,890 Kech Banda Ibrahim Zai 24,038 Khan Bari Raisan Darband Ganjiano Kalli Kurrum Agency Darband 11,072 Shinawari Hangu 53,487 Bilyamina 17,059 32,627 Naryab 23,340 902 Naryab Kahi 1,165 20,547 Kotki Kahi Tora Warai 24,518 1,022 Togh Sarai Darsamand 742 Mohammad Khawaja 26,7To2g0h Serai Kohat Sarozai Hangu 20,000 Ali Kach 32,210 542 Darsamand Doaba 343 1,405 Muhammad Khawja Thall Rural Thall FA Thall NA v® Dalan p f 100,000 w N Thall Urban Karbogha 8,514 AJK Name of HF Catchment populaton IDPs (Individuals) Fata THQ Hangu 53,487 32627 Punjab BHU Ibrahimzai 24,038 11072 Dallan Balochistan BHU Darband 17,059 902 BHU Bilyamina 23,340 1165 North Waziristan Agency IDPs Movement BHU Shahoo Khel 17,170 16890 Karak Legend BHU Togh Sarai 26,720 542 THQ BHU M. Khawaja 20,000 343 RHC BHU Kahi 24,518 742 v® CH RHC Naryab 20,547 1022 Catchment BHU Tribal Area Bannu SHC Doaba 3495 Population MCH BHU Darsamand 32,210 1405 District boundary CH Thall 100,000 8514 IDPs Union Council boundary Produced by: Information Management Unit, Date created: April 01, 2010 WHO Map Num: WHO-IDP-374 IDPs data source: 0 100 200 400 600 800 WHO-Pakistan District Officer Social Welfare Kilometers WWE Hangu The boundaries, names and the designation used on this map do not imply official GIS data source: Note: SHC Doaba is not geocoded.The enclosed circle of health facilities does not cover the geographical area of the population.
1 Annexure - D Names of Village / Neighbourhood Councils Alongwith Seats Detail of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

1 Annexure - D Names of Village / Neighbourhood Councils alongwith seats detail of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa No. of General Seats in No. of Seats in VC/NC (Categories) Names of S. Names of Tehsil Councils No falling in each Neighbourhood Village N/Hood Total Col Peasants/Work S. No. Village Councils (VC) S. No. Women Youth Minority . district Council Councils (NC) Councils Councils 7+8 ers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Abbottabad District Council 1 1 Dalola-I 1 Malik Pura Urban-I 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 2 Dalola-II 2 Malik Pura Urban-II 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 3 Dabban-I 3 Malik Pura Urban-III 5 8 13 4 2 2 2 4 Dabban-II 4 Central Urban-I 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 5 Boi-I 5 Central Urban-II 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 6 Boi-II 6 Central Urban-III 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 7 Sambli Dheri 7 Khola Kehal 7 7 14 4 2 2 2 8 Bandi Pahar 8 Upper Kehal 5 7 12 4 2 2 2 9 Upper Kukmang 9 Kehal 5 8 13 4 2 2 2 10 Central Kukmang 10 Nawa Sher Urban 5 10 15 4 2 2 2 11 Kukmang 11 Nawansher Dhodial 6 10 16 4 2 2 2 12 Pattan Khurd 5 5 2 1 1 1 13 Nambal-I 5 5 2 1 1 1 14 Nambal-II 6 6 2 1 1 1 Abbottabad 15 Majuhan-I 7 7 2 1 1 1 16 Majuhan-II 6 6 2 1 1 1 17 Pattan Kalan-I 5 5 2 1 1 1 18 Pattan Kalan-II 6 6 2 1 1 1 19 Pattan Kalan-III 6 6 2 1 1 1 20 Sialkot 6 6 2 1 1 1 21 Bandi Chamiali 6 6 2 1 1 1 22 Bakot-I 7 7 2 1 1 1 23 Bakot-II 6 6 2 1 1 1 24 Bakot-III 6 6 2 1 1 1 25 Moolia-I 6 6 2 1 1 1 26 Moolia-II 6 6 2 1 1 1 1 Abbottabad No.
Afghanistan: out of Sight, out of Mind: the Fate of the Afghan Returnees

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of this report .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Map of Afghanistan ......................................................................................... 5 2. Pattern of displacement and return in 2003 ............................................................ 6 3. Return from neighbouring states – the issue of voluntariness ................................. 8 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Pakistan ........................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Iran ................................................................................................................ 10 3.3.1 Human rights abuses of Afghans in Iran .................................................. 10 3.3.2 Forced returns from Iran......................................................................... 11 4. Non-neighbouring states – forced return and promotion of assisted returns .......... 11 Forced returns from the UK ............................................................................. 13 5. IDPs – voluntariness of return and forced return .................................................