31 January 1994

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

31 January 1994 men In• race or cover MELTDOWN ... This butter sculpture of Kaplcin Hendrik Wilbooi, proudly dis played when Namibia's new currency was launched last yea r, was on Thursday pictured abandoned In the park al Ausspanplatz., close 10 the Embassy. Everyone burying heads on boreholes Villagers STAFF REPORTERS ONE DAY vent anger NO-ONE will take responsibility for drilling two boreholes, costing up to N$SO at Ithete 000 each from drought relief funds, on Clearance Sale the private ostrich farm of a deputy tue.dcay 1 Februcary 1994 VILLAGERS and the tta­ minister and a Minister. ditional leader are upset Every department and individual concerned. in­ oehOO IhI 17hJO ONI.Y and angry in Uutslhathima cluding the Office of the President. has referred the village. next to Elosha D0- question elsewhere. mesticated Osuiches farm owned by a minister and According to doc umentary evidence seen )y th is deputy minister. reporter and not so far dispufed. water fac ilities .1 .aI.nab They are conce rn ed were requested by de puty minister of Home Affai rs ewt_ LeA 11.1" oyer the nine young men Nangolo Ithete for the Etosha Domes ticated Os­ 4pc. D.......... She... 11$ 61·'1 arrested on January 4 on lriches farm which he runs with Justice Minister VCII'I ... hv.t Seta ostrich charges and are Ngarikutuke Tjiriange. LeA ID" still in custody awaiting These were installed under the drought relief .ccus .... .. LeA ID" trial. programme and in the documentation seen were Iperbl_ ChIll ... 11$ I·tt Specific all egations always referred to as being for the farm or for the we re made by !he villag- ministe rs. never as community boreholes as has cont. on 2 cont. on Caprivi tensions flare PREVENT DISSIPOINTMENT. they enlered the Linyantiarea in a Ford JOSEFMOT1IIBA bakkie. Makumbi was shot and died instantly and his wife was wounded in NAMPOL'S Commi ssioner Siggy 8E ••' the shoulder when unknown persons Eimbtck is expected to fl y to the opened fire. Caprivi 10 head up an investigation In another incidenl . Brian into the depth of Linas Mu lauli M\\o'akamuyi Muhimubi. driving a MakumbiJp a fresh outbreak of tribal bakkie entered the same area from the Winclhoak Branch On. lighting between the Mayeyi and the othe r direction and was also fired on Mafwe. but escaped unhurt as did his passen­ • According to police spokesman, gers, Geyser said. Chierlnspe<'torSeanGcyscrthcsnoot­ Inspector General Raounga Andima ing took place at about 21 hOO on has ordered a senior officlr to fly to the Friday. when Makumbi (33) and his Caprivi and head up the investigation. wi fe. Molly Makumbi, from the after cont. on 2 ""-. -: 2 Monday January 31 1994 THE NAMIBIAN e9U :Ob Efl!!: i\ t\ lil,Mt" " i,jj' .~ , t" r '2' t eM • • __c_co • I • a. - ._ . - - - IT .. _ .... Caprivi tensions Fish talks Rukoro denies ousting .._ r ...... ·dIM tJ(e.. FAOMPAGE1 'Minister of Trade and NAMlBlANlishingcom­ Industry Hid ipo of n. panies att apparently en­ VEKUII Rukoro, Deputy they are deputising; His Exce ll ency, d_ Districl Commis· Hamutenya was quoted gaged in di scussions on Minister or Justice, has the President, however, has the power s.. .. M_. sioner of Rundu, Chief as saying the land be· establ ishingjoint ventures to invite any deputy minister to allend deputy-. Inspector Ben Haingura longed to Ihe Govern­ with fore ign companies vehemently denied a report in Friday's edition of The a particular session or all sessions of IDdutrlaJ aad has already sent rein­ menL with a view to setting up Cabinet by way of a special considera­ Tecta.le •• forcements 10 the area The Mayeyi also gian t processing fac tories Namlblan to the elfeet that he at Wal vis Bay and was ousted from Cabinet_ tion. and personally. visited claimed that even the "Since I was President of the NNF The _of die the scene on Saturday Linyanti tribal headquar­ Luderi lZ. In a hardhiuing statement on Fri­ A source from one of and Swanu when ( was init ially ap­ --MlaIIIry of Trade night. ters of the Mafwe fell in day, Rukoro also de nied that he had pointed as deputy minister, it was the companies told The .... 1Dd....,._ Geyser said although their area. voiced criticism of lack of Govern­ agreed between HE the President and no arrests had been made In addition, they have Nami bian the meeting was ment action concerning the alleged toCOllyeytbelr ..... 10 be held at Hotel myselfthat by virtue of my leadership _cond_ yet, members of the been angered by the lack involvement of Minister of Justice, of NNF and Swanu. l sha ll be made a Mafwe tribe were under of recognition from the Thuringe rbof. The Minis­ Ngarikutuke Tjiriange. and deputy to tbe bereaved try of Fisheries and Ma­ regular auendant of Cabinet meetings. suspicion as the incident Government of their Home Affairs minister, Nangolo ( resigned the aforesaid positions family, particu­ took place in their area. chief inaugurated last rine Resources has appar­ Ithe te, in illegal ostrich dealing. He ently been in touch with last September and ever since the n, larly to CaroIlDe According to earlier year when the Mayeyi said thal no such subject had been Namibian companies in stricllyspeaking, l had nojustification .... It.. L reports reaching The broke away from the discussed at Cabine t. response to a request from attendi ng Cabinet meetings in my own Namibian, the Mafwe Mafwe tri bal authority. Zbu ",.. IoVed rlmign companies forsuit· On the subject of his fUlUre attend­ right. and much-valued are up in arms over the Dr Libertine able contacts for the for­ ance al Cabinet meetings, Rukoro siad .. It is therefore clear that the deci­ Government's allocation Amathila, Ministe r of that "following an amicable and com­ mfmber of our mation of joint ventures. sion mu tually arrived at between the of land to the Pidico ag- ' ...If. RegionaJ and Loca1Gov­ Many Namibian com­ radely discussion between the Right Prime Minister and myself is noth ing ricultural investment ernment, told The Honourable Prime Minister and my­ be rat panies were keen on the but a normal regularisation of my po­ May In project without their per­ Namibian the Govern­ idea of joint ventures be· self it was agreed that my regular sition and status as ordinary deputy ........ peece. mission. ment could not recog­ cause such huge factories attendance at Cabinet meetings was Pe........ , tee­ mi nister in Government on a par with The Mafwe hadvowed nise the chief unlil Par­ would need a massive in­ no longer necessary in view of the other deputy min isters.'" retary, Trade aad tofighlshouldthe project liament had passed a bill now of fish. No infanna­ following: as a rule Deputy Ministers IndUllr)'t continue, said Police on lraditional authorities tion on the outcome of the do not attend Cabinet meetings in Rukoro concluded by say ing that TsudooGurIrob. spokesperson Edwin later this year. meeting could be gleaned their own right but onl y in the absence both he and the Prime Minister were KanguatjivL befor going to press. of their substantive Ministers whom "happy" with this arrangement. PRESTIGE DEVELOPERS Villagers vent anger at Ithete KHOMASDAL paper's attorney. Hans Heyman isstill hold­ IS ill Khoraluib ~i~~ l FROM PAGE 1 GroupSchomeo I I The conlroversy sur­ ing the docket concern ing * INo-Ili .. llhQi Ip ubm ulll ... la IIl!Dllpo om ers and fann staff about rounds a fann in Omusati the arrests of the nine and !lIea !aroma? VACANCY the role of deputy minister region, some 20 kilome­ other evidence collected IGAi ml'llui !Khaiball la &&? Rata l~mde \IbI. Oml * of Home Affai rs and fann tres from UUlSathima , during an investigati on by am.ere .. b1!Khab Me a dillK.ba I&b to &&7 A VACANCY EXIST FOR A MALE co-owner Nangolo Ithete 160km south· west of officialsoflhe Departmen t *IHullhuaabahcb allui _..en 1nl-!DIom. taWI si CLERK IN OUR W1NDHOEK BRANCH in th e ostric h catching. Oshakati, and known lo­ of Nature Conservation. m.baocu ld !IUI"IIJauIa. !~ IIoaiIIICJU ai? These.andthedeputymin­ cally as Kambango. Th is So far he has not said * Ne Ipwi&a mI dldi ait. , a ~a~ liml !m=am et. se !I Ai POSITION: Sales Support Specialist IIKheet.. uhltdla l e Iati-i lui-e, .. Gib !DI n. lp>. ister's response, have been was allocated to Ithete for whelher he has re ached SALARY: Negotiable re ferredtoThe Namibian 's his use by the Ongandjera any decision about fu nher !ita ae IpriHllrivave IIII lkhI allpm IIKh1 I11111 * lawyers for checking to tradi tional authority as the charges or further in vesti­ ligan lamlve . ida di 10000lmsa omdi di Ipup REQUIREMENTS: nll U1 st mt!la!gabu !uoma. ascertain whether they in­ space was empty. accord­ gation. Matric frir:ge on sub judice ru les ing to curren t practice in Nine vill ager! were Till I Khl I "-oIhMIven~. ne no sao 1l1li... I,&no IIo wa. Computer literate as the nine have already communal areas. charged in Oshakati mag­ charged have ap­ Contrary to reports. the istrates court with illegal S"-ai lawall4656 1ai. Nunibiln been and Must be transferrable peared in coun. area has nOI becn fenced catching and se lli ng or os­ Oma llwa 2161 33 triches and prodUCIS. No Must have own transport Thecommunity was due except for one kraaJ for to call a meet ing last Fri­ os tri ches and a large charges have yet been FRINGE BENEFITS: day to di scuss what action mahangu field , as is nor­ brought for buyi ng os­ mal in theNorth.
Recommended publications
  • Class Action Complaint
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________________________________x VEKUII RUKORO, Paramount Chief of the Ovaherero People and Representative of the Ovaherero Traditional Authority; DAVID FREDERICK, Chief and Chairman of the Nama Traditional Authorities Association, Civ. No. 17-0062 THE ASSOCIATION OF THE OVAHERERO GENOCIDE IN THE USA INC.; and BARNABAS VERAA KATUUO, CLASS ACTION Individually and as an Officer of The Association of the COMPLAINT Ovaherero Genocide in the USA, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all other Ovaherero and Nama indigenous peoples, Plaintiffs, Jury Trial Demanded -against- FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Defendant. _____________________________________________x Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, McCallion & Associates LLP, bring this Class Action Complaint against Defendant Federal Republic of Germany as follows: SUMMARY OF THE COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all the Ovaherero and Nama peoples for damages resulting from the horrific genocide and unlawful taking of property in violation of international law by the German colonial authorities during the 1885 to 1909 period in what was formerly known as South West Africa, and is now Namibia. Plaintiffs also bring this action to, among other things, enjoin and restrain the Federal Republic of Germany from continuing to exclude plaintiffs and other lawful representatives of the Ovaherero and Nama people from participation in discussions and negotiations regarding the subject matter of this Complaint, in violation of plaintiffs’ rights under international law, including the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People to self-determination for all indigenous peoples and their right to participate and speak for themselves regarding all matters relating to the losses that they have suffered.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cv-00062 Document 1 Filed 01/05/17 Page 1 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-00062 Document 1 Filed 01/05/17 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________________________________x VEKUII RUKORO, Paramount Chief of the Ovaherero People and Representative of the Ovaherero Traditional Authority; DAVID FREDERICK, Chief and Chairman of the Nama Traditional Authorities Association, Civ. No. THE ASSOCIATION OF THE OVAHERERO GENOCIDE IN THE USA INC.; and BARNABAS VERAA KATUUO, CLASS ACTION Individually and as an Officer of The Association of the COMPLAINT Ovaherero Genocide in the USA, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all other Ovaherero and Nama indigenous peoples, Plaintiffs, Jury Trial Demanded -against- FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Defendant. _____________________________________________x Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, McCallion & Associates LLP, bring this Class Action Complaint against Defendant Federal Republic of Germany as follows: SUMMARY OF THE COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all the Ovaherero and Nama peoples for damages resulting from the horrific genocide and unlawful taking of property in violation of international law by the German colonial authorities during the 1885 to 1909 period in what was formerly known as South West Africa, and is now Namibia. Plaintiffs also bring this action to, among other things, enjoin and restrain the Federal Republic of Germany from continuing to exclude plaintiffs and other lawful representatives of the Ovaherero and Nama people from participation in discussions and negotiations regarding the subject matter of this Complaint, in Case 1:17-cv-00062 Document 1 Filed 01/05/17 Page 2 of 22 violation of plaintiffs’ rights under international law, including the U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Hum 2019 Brock Penoh
    Politics of Reparations: Unravelling the Power Relations in the Herero/Nama Genocide Reparations Claims Penohole Brock, BRCPEN002 A minor dissertation submitted in partial fullfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy (Justice and Transformation). Faculty of the Humanities University of Cape Town [2019] University of Cape Town COMPULSORY DECLARATION This work has not been previously submitted in whole, or in part, for the award of any degree. It is my own work. Each significant contribution to, and quotation in, this dissertation from the work, or works, of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. Signature: Date: 10.02.2019 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Abstract The Herero/Nama Genocide (1904-1908) under German colonialism in Namibia is the first genocide of the twentieth century and has stirred debates around reparations for historical injustices. Reparative Justice has evolved into a victim-centric pillar of justice, in which perpetrators are legally and morally obligated to pay reparations in its several forms to its victims, including material and symbolic reparations. This thesis is a case study of reparations claims for historical injustices, specifically colonial genocide and explores such claims as a political process.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform Is Basically a Class Issue”
    This land is my land! Motions and emotions around land reform in Namibia Erika von Wietersheim 1 This study and publication was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office. Copyright: FES 2021 Cover photo: Kristin Baalman/Shutterstock.com Cover design: Clara Mupopiwa-Schnack All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the written permission of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. First published 2008 Second extended edition 2021 Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office P.O. Box 23652 Windhoek Namibia ISBN 978-99916-991-0-3 Printed by John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 5688 Windhoek / Namibia [email protected] 2 To all farmers in Namibia who love their land and take good care of it in honour of their ancestors and for the sake of their children 3 4 Acknowledgement I would like to thank the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation Windhoek, in particular its director Mr. Hubert Schillinger at the time of the first publication and Ms Freya Gruenhagen at the time of this extended second publication, as well as Sylvia Mundjindi, for generously supporting this study and thus making the publication of ‘This land is my land’ possible. Furthermore I thank Wolfgang Werner for adding valuable up-to-date information to this book about the development of land reform during the past 13 years. My special thanks go to all farmers who received me with an open heart and mind on their farms, patiently answered my numerous questions - and took me further with questions of their own - and those farmers and interview partners who contributed to this second edition their views on the progress of land reform until 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ovaherero/Nama Genocide: a Case for an Apology and Reparations
    European Scientific Journal June 2017 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 The Ovaherero/Nama Genocide: A Case for an Apology and Reparations Nick Sprenger Robert G. Rodriguez, PhD Texas A&M University-Commerce Ngondi A. Kamaṱuka, PhD University of Kansas Abstract This research examines the consequences of the Ovaherero and Nama massacres occurring in modern Namibia from 1904-08 and perpetuated by Imperial Germany. Recent political advances made by, among other groups, the Association of the Ovaherero Genocide in the United States of America, toward mutual understanding with the Federal Republic of Germany necessitates a comprehensive study about the event itself, its long-term implications, and the more current vocalization toward an apology and reparations for the Ovaherero and Nama peoples. Resulting from the Extermination Orders of 1904 and 1905 as articulated by Kaiser Wilhelm II’s Imperial Germany, over 65,000 Ovaherero and 10,000 Nama peoples perished in what was the first systematic genocide of the twentieth century. This study assesses the historical circumstances surrounding these genocidal policies carried out by Imperial Germany, and seeks to place the devastating loss of life, culture, and property within its proper historical context. The question of restorative justice also receives analysis, as this research evaluates the case made by the Ovaherero and Nama peoples in their petitions for compensation. Beyond the history of the event itself and its long-term effects, the paper adopts a comparative approach by which to integrate the Ovaherero and Nama calls for reparations into an established precedent. Keywords: Ovaherero, Herero, Nama, Namibia, Southwest Africa, Germany, genocide, Lothar von Trotha, Kaiser Wilhelm II Introduction In 2006, the Honorable Kuaima Riruako, then the Paramount Chief of the Ovaherero people, delivered an address before the Namibian Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reconciliation and the Land Question in Namibia
    CCK-7 INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS National reconciliation and the land uestion in Namibla Casey C. Kelso c/o Woker Travel P.O.Box 211 Windhoek, Namibia April 30, 1992 Peter Bird Martin Executive Director Institute of Current World Affairs 4 West Wheel ock Street Hanover, New Hampshire, USA 03755 Dear Peter: Post-war reconciliation in Namibia and its opposite can fleetingly appear in small, almost unnoticeable interactions on the streets of Namibia's capital city of Windhoek. These seemingly insignificant actions reveal a great deal about the mixed progress in changing basic attitudes that underlie relations between 85,000 whites and 1.3 million blacks in a country fostered under the apartheid racism of South Africa. Some of the spontaneous reactions of Namibia's people encourage me. A yellow Opel Kadette stalls on Independence Avenue, the city's busiest street, during the lunch-hour rush. A young white man leaps off the curb to help the black driver push his disabled vehicle into a parking spot a few yards away. In the bustle outside a large office building a few blocks down the avenue, a gray-haired, pale-skinned matron in a long green dress and pearls pauses as she walks past a black beggar sitting on the pavement. The miserable man stretches out his hand clutching a cup. He hopefully rattles it, but she quickly disappears into a "take-away" food shop a few doors down. Both his hand and head fall back into a despondent huddle. The woman is back moments later with a yellow plastic bag full of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Genocide in Namibia
    www.ssoar.info Remembering Genocide in Namibia Reitz, Núrel Bahí; Mannitz, Sabine Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK) Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Reitz, N. B., & Mannitz, S. (2021). Remembering Genocide in Namibia. (PRIF Working Papers, 53). Frankfurt am Main: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-73450-7 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Structure of FNB Namibia Group
    FNB NAMIBIA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2007 Group Structure of FNB Namibia Group First National Bank Swabou Investments of Namibia Ltd (Pty) Ltd 100% 100% Swabou Life Assurance Company Ltd 100% FirstRand 59.23% Swabou Insurance Company Ltd 100% General Public 24.08% FNB Namibia Unit Trusts Ltd 100% GIPF RMB Asset Management 16.69% (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd 50% First National Asset Management and Trust Company of Namibia (Pty) Ltd 100% Talas Properties (Windhoek) (Pty) Ltd 100% 2 FNB NAMIBIA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2007 Features of the Group Results % Year ended 30 June Change 2007 2006 Share Performance Earnings per share (cents) 19 114.7 96.7 Headline earnings per share (cents) 19 113.1 95.0 Dividends per share (cents) - ordinary (Actual declared in financial period) 18 47.0 40.0 Dividends per share (cents) - special (Actual declared in financial period) 93.0 Closing share price (cents) - ordinary 13 792.0 700.0 Number of shares in issue (millions) - ordinary* 264.3 264.3 Weighted number of shares in issue (millions) - ordinary* 264.3 264.3 Dividend cover (times) - ordinary (based on actual shares in issue of 267.6 million) 2.4 2.4 Net asset value per share (cents) (5) 469.3 492.7 Dividend yield (%) - ordinary dividend >100 17.7 5.7 Earnings yield (%) - ordinary shares 5 14.5 13.8 Price to Book ratio 21 1.7 1.4 Price: Earnings ratio - ordinary shares (4) 6.9 7.2 * after consolidation of employee share trust Selected ratios Return on average shareholders' equity (%) 16 23.8 20.6 Return on average assets (%) 3 3.0 2.9 Cost to income ratio (%) 4 47.5 49.3
    [Show full text]
  • The Homecoming of Ovaherero and Nama Skulls: Overriding Politics And
    i i i The homecoming of Ovaherero and i Nama skulls: overriding politics and injustices HUMAN REMAINS & VIOLENCE Vilho Amukwaya Shigwedha The University of Namibia [email protected] Abstract In October 2011, twenty skulls of the Herero and Nama people were repatriated from Germany to Namibia. So far, y-ve skulls and two human skeletons have been repatriated to Namibia and preparations for the return of more skulls from Germany were at an advanced stage at the time of writing this article. Nonetheless, the skulls and skeletons that were returned from Germany in the past have been disappointingly laden with complexities and politics, to such an extent that they have not yet been handed over to their respective communities for mourning and burials. In this context, this article seeks to investigate the practice of ‘anonymis- ing’ the presence of human remains in society by exploring the art and politics of the Namibian state’s memory production and sanctioning in enforcing restrictions on the aected communities not to perform, as they wish, their cultural and ritual practices for the remains of their ancestors. Key words: Skulls, Herero, Nama, genocide, Germany, Namibia Introduction Until 1919, today’s Namibia was ocially the colony of German South West Africa (GSWA). This came as a result of the 1884/85 Berlin Conference, which formally recognised Germany’s right to operate in and colonise the territory that it renamed GSWA.1 German colonial occupation of this territory, which was renamed Namibia in 1968, lasted from 1885 until 1919, when Imperial Germany was defeated in the First World War and subsequently lost her colonies in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTRATUR AA. 3 (Enlarged and Revised Edition)
    REGISTRATUR AA. 3 (Enlarged and Revised Edition) 2 REGISTRATUR AA. 3 (Enlarged and Revised Edition) GUIDE TO THE SWAPO COLLECTION IN THE BASLER AFRIKA BIBLIOGRAPHIEN Compiled by Giorgio Miescher Published by Basler Afrika Bibliographien Namibia Resource Centre & Southern Africa Library 2006 3 © 2006 Basler Afrika Bibliographien Publisher: Basler Afrika Bibliographien P.O.Box 2037 CH 4001 Basel Switzerland http://www.baslerafrika.ch All rights reserved Printed by Typoprint (Pty) Ltd, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia ISBN 3-905141-89-2 4 List of Contents I The General Archives of the Basler Afrika Bibliographien 7 II Introduction to the enlarged and revised edition 9 Changing archiving pattern since 1994 10 Collections of SWAPO material scattered around the world 12 The BAB SWAPO collection and its institutional context 14 Researching the history of SWAPO (and the liberation struggle) 16 Sources to write the history of SWAPO and the liberation struggle 20 III How to work with this Archival Guide 22 Structure of organisation 22 Classification system of the SWAPO collection 22 List of abbreviations 24 IV Inventory AA. 3 25 before 1966 from SWAPO 27 1966 about SWAPO 28 1968 from SWAPO 29 1969 from/about SWAPO 30 1970 from/about SWAPO 32 1971 from/about SWAPO 34 1972 from/about SWAPO 37 1973 from/about SWAPO 42 1974 from/about SWAPO 45 1975 from/about SWAPO 50 1976 from/about SWAPO 56 1977 from/about SWAPO 64 1978 from/about SWAPO 72 1979 from/about SWAPO 82 1980 from/about SWAPO 88 1981 from/about SWAPO 100 1982 from/about SWAPO 113 1983 from/about
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of New York
    Case 1:17-cv-00062-LTS Document 61-2 Filed 10/31/18 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VEKUII RUKORO, Paramount Chief of the Ovaherero People and Representative of the Ovaherero Traditional Civ. No. 17-00062-LTS Authority; JOHANNES ISAACK, Chief and Chairman of the Nama Traditional Authorities Association, THE ASSOCIATION OF THE OVAHERERO GENOCIDE IN THE USA INC.; and BARNABAS VERAA KATUUO, SUPPLEMENTAL Individually and as an Officer of The Association of the DECLARATION OF Ovaherero Genocide in the USA, Inc., on behalf of MICHAEL J. LOCKMAN themselves and all other Ovaherero and Nama indigenous peoples, Plaintiffs, -against- FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Defendant. MICHAEL J. LOCKMAN declares as follows under penalties of perjury: 1. I submit this Supplemental Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in New York and I am fluent in German, with five years experience as a German-English translator. The translations of German materials herein are true and authentic. 2. In my Declaration of April 24, 2018, I declared that while working for McCallion & Associates LLP in 2017, I had learned about Germany’s commercial activities related to bone collection.1 Plaintiffs and their counsel first became aware of the presence of human remains at the American Museum of Natural History (“AMNH”) relating to this case in or about September 2017; however, as of the filing of their opposition papers to Germany’s Motion to Dismiss and the date of oral argument on July 31, 2018, Plaintiffs’ investigation of the facts concerning the 1 Lockman Decl.
    [Show full text]