Michael Eakin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Michael Eakin Dave Peasley Director of Resources Civic Centre, Reading, RG1 7AE. 0118 937 3737 Fax: 0118 958 9770 To: Councillor Bayes (Chair); Our Ref: perscttc/agenda Councillors Lovelock, Page, Pugh and Your Ref: Steele. Direct: 0118 937 2332 e-mail:[email protected] 22 September 2010 Your contact is: Richard Woodford – Committee Services NOTICE OF MEETING – PERSONNEL COMMITTEE – 30 SEPTEMBER 2010 A meeting of the Personnel Committee will be held on Thursday 30 September 2010 at 6.30pm in Committee Room 1, Civic Offices, Reading. The Agenda for the meeting is set out below: AGENDA ACTION WARDS AFFECTED PAGE NO 1. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 2. MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 1 INFORMATION BOROUGHWIDE 1 JULY 2010 3. PROCEEDINGS OF LOCAL JOINT INFORMATION BOROUGHWIDE 7 FORUM HELD ON 1 JULY 2010 AND 2 SEPTEMBER 2010 4. EQUALITY AUDIT 2009/10 INFORMATION BOROUGHWIDE 17 5. EQUALITIES ACT 2010 INFORMATION BOROUGHWIDE 23 6. PAY AND GRADING REVIEW - INFORMATION BOROUGHWIDE 32 IMPLEMENTATION 7. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INFORMATIION BOROUGHWIDE 35 PROGRAMME (PIP) - UPDATE 8. STAFF BENEFITS/TOTAL REWARD DECISION BOROUGHWIDE 40 CIVIC CENTRE EMERGENCY EVACUATION: Please familiarise yourself with the emergency evacuation procedures, which are displayed inside the Council’s meeting rooms. If an alarm sounds, leave by the nearest fire exit quickly and calmly and assemble at the Hexagon sign, at the start of Queen’s Walk. You will be advised when it is safe to re-enter the building. www.reading.gov.uk Minicom 0118 937 2700 DX 40124 Reading (Castle Street) 9. CONTRACT TO PROVIDE ACCESS DECISION BOROUGHWIDE 47 TO A CYCLE FOR WORK SCHEME 10. CHANGE PROGRAMMES – DECISION BOROUGHWIDE 52 GUIDANCE FOR STAFF At this point, the following motion will be moved by the Chair: “That, pursuant to Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) members of the press and public be excluded during consideration of the following items on the agenda, as it is likely that there would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in the relevant Paragraphs of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of that Act” 11. EARLY RETIREMENTS AND DECISION BOROUGHWIDE Report to REDUNDANCIES Follow 12. EARLY RETIREMENTS AND DECISION BOROUGHWIDE Report to REDUNDANCIES – HOUSING AND Follow COMMUNITY CARE www.reading.gov.uk Minicom 0118 939 0700 DX 40124 Reading (Castle Street) PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES – 1 JULY 2010 Present: Councillor (Chair); Councillors Lovelock and Steele. Also Present: A Burton, J Hoggart, D Peasley and M Popham. Apologies: Councillors Page and Pugh. RESOLVED ITEMS 1. MINUTES The Minutes of the meeting held on 4 March 2010 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. 2. APPOINTMENT TO SOUTH EAST EMPLOYERS’ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Committee was asked to make appointments to the South East Employers’ Executive Committee for the 2010/11 Municipal Year. Resolved – (1) That Councillors Bayes and Steele be appointed to the South East Employers’ Executive Committee for the 2010/11 Municipal Year; (2) That Councillor Page be appointed as the Standing Deputy to the South East Employers’ Executive Committee for the 2010/11 Municipal Year. 3. HR APPROACH TO DELIVER PIP SAVINGS Further to Minute 29 of the meeting held on 4 March 2010, Anne Burton, Head of HR, submitted a report on the management of key HR issues arising from significant organisational change linked to savings built into the budget, based on the ten cases for change set out in the Performance Improvement Programme (PIP). In view of the tight timescales for delivering savings, it had been agreed that there would be a Council-wide approach followed to manage a reduction in the workforce, ensuring that clear links were made to the PIP cases for change. The Committee agreed that the efficiency savings to be delivered through PIP should be monitored separately to those in-year savings required by external factors, such as reduced grant funding, to assess the effects of both on staffing levels and services being delivered. The Committee noted that service areas were looking at ways in which efficiencies and improvements could be secured through an analysis of working arrangements and structures. The proposed Refuse Pay scheme was appended to the report as an example of this process. 1 PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES – 1 JULY 2010 Resolved – (1) That, in accordance with the framework agreed at the meeting held on 4 March 2010 (Minute 29 refers), managers be authorised to take more proactive steps to manage down the workforce towards a staff cohort informed by the recommendations arising from the 10 cases for change; (2) That these steps to manage down the workforce be based initially on an elective and voluntary approach for staff but recognising that this would need to change to a more corporately directive approach should insufficient savings be secured; (3) That the timetable and compensation framework set out in paragraph 4 to the report be agreed; (4) That the approach to other service efficiency reviews, as exemplified by recent refuse pay proposals set out in the Appendix to the report, be endorsed for further consultation. 4. PERFORMANCE RELATED PROGRESSION POLICY Anne Burton, Head of HR, submitted a report on progress to introduce the new Performance Related Progression Policy using a set of council-wide 'Core Competencies', which would underpin people management from recruitment to learning and development and performance management. The competency framework had been developed and had been drawn-up in consultation with various ‘stakeholder’ groups, including trade unions. A copy of the revised Leading the Way – Managing People Performance – Contribution Based Pay Scheme competencies was appended to the report. The main benefits of a competency-based system were: • Employees would have a set of objectives to work towards and would be clear about how they were expected to perform their jobs; • The appraisal and recruitment systems would be fairer and more open; • There would be a link between organisational and personal objectives; • Processes would be measurable and standardised across organisational and service boundaries. The anticipated timescale for implementation of performance-related progression would be April 2011. The Trade Unions had been generally supportive of the Policy and the increased transparency it would provide by setting clear expectations of staff and demonstrating how they could progress. However, they had made the point that performance related progression was inextricably linked to the pay and grading review, which would provide the reward element of the scheme. Therefore, the introduction of the Policy would need to be accompanied by the implementation of the new pay and grading structure. The Single Status 2 PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES – 1 JULY 2010 Agreement (Pay and Grading Review) would be discussed in Part 2 of this meeting (Minute 7 refers). Resolved - That, subject to the conclusion of consultation with stakeholders, the new Performance Related Progression Policy be approved as attached to the report. 5. SAFEGUARDING – VETTING AND BARRING SCHEME Further to Minute 30 of the meeting held on 4 March 2010, Anne Burton, Head of Human Resources, submitted a report on progress towards the implementation of the new Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) / Vetting and Barring Scheme. The report explained that the Home Office had announced that the Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) for those working with children and vulnerable adults would be put on hold so that it could be reviewed. As a result, the Independent Safeguarding Authority registration stage of the scheme, which had been due to start on 26 July 2010, had been stopped. In the meantime, the existing requirements concerning Criminal Records Bureau checks remained in place and those checks would still be carried out where necessary; and the parts of the VBS put in place in October 2009 continued to be in force. Therefore, it remained a criminal offence for individuals barred by the ISA to work or apply to work with children and vulnerable adults across a wide-range of posts. The two ISA barred lists for children and adults, which replaced the three former lists (POCA, POVA and List 99) would continue to be operational. Local authorities, employers, professional regulators and other bodies would retain the duty to refer information to the ISA about individuals who had caused harm to or posed a potential threat to children or vulnerable adults. Resolved – That the position be noted. 6. EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC Resolved - That pursuant to Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) members of the press and public be excluded during consideration of the following item, as it was likely that there would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) to that Act. 7. SINGLE STATUS AGREEMENT (PAY AND REWARD) Further to Minutes 32 and 16 of the meetings held on 4 March 2010 and 29 October 2009 respectively, Dave Peasley, Director of Resources, submitted an update report on the Single Status pay and grading review. The report explained the current position in relation to implementation of the scheme. The Committee was 3 PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MINUTES – 1 JULY 2010 given details of Counsel’s opinion on the implementation process in the light of the legal developments relating to the proposed scheme. As a result of the legal advice received and careful consideration of a range of options and their associated risks, it was recommended that the implementation of the pay and grading scheme should be introduced from 1 April 2011, and in those cases where individual agreement could not be secured this would be achieved by the dismissal and re-engagement of the NJC staff it affected. The report had appended the key milestones and dates for the project and the latest proposed pay and reward package.
Recommended publications
  • Can a Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed
    Can A Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed Aldis pargets her typologist inland, whole-wheat and incisive. Electrophoretic Powell redded unreconcilably. Complacent Barnebas remitting her tribologist so rightward that Sollie ratten very adroitly. We will formally confirmed by the notice can a planning be appealed and to The requirements of options available to a contravention of middlesbrough council can carry a contravention notice can a be appealed to sell your client relationship between legal proceedings where a continuous uninterrupted period. There however no right upon appeal Section 215 notice this character be used to require improvements to the appearance. The notice be used on the customer care in carrying out the precise location of planning contravention notice be a planning contravention notice can quickly as possible breach of lawfulness for. Again might appeal and be submitted under simple procedure previously described. Development and Planning Amendment Act 201. We decide it is caused harm to take formal enforcement officer on that contravention notice is no right of planning law count more likely, the gdpr cookie settings. We can improve your local authority need my letter and being caused by recipients of a contravention notices? There cannot also a rib of round against any formal notice must if planning. While planning applications can be viewed online we regret that it nothing not currently. An opportunity to the land at a considerable delay necessary, if it is the notice can also be suspended and there is. It must be acceptable development within an owner privileges to a planning can contravention notice be appealed against breaches of condition of a stop notice must specify the enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Councillor Submissions to the Middlesbrough Borough Council Electoral Review
    Councillor submissions to the Middlesbrough Borough Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 9 submissions from councillors. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Cllr Bernie Taylor Middlesbrough Council Town Hall Middlesbrough TS1 2QQ The Local Government Boundary Commission for England, Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG To the members and officers of the Commission, Having seen the Draft Recommendations for Middlesbrough which you have produced, I would like to thank you for the time and effort you no doubt spent on the plans. I would, however, like to draw your attention to a small row of houses whose residents I feel would be better served in the Newport Ward which you propose. I would also like to request that the name of the proposed Ayresome ward be changed to Acklam Green to reflect the local community and provide a clearer identity for the ward. There is a street of around fifteen properties whose residents would be better served if they were part of the proposed Newport ward. The houses run along the south side of Stockton Road – known colloquially as the ‘Wilderness Road.’ This road is cut off from the rest of the Aryesome ward by the A66 and isolated from the mane population centre of the proposed Aryesome ward by the Teesside Park Leisure complex. However, Stockton Road is easily accessed from the proposed Newport Road as the road travels under the A19 flyover.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB Members (July 2021)
    Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB members (July 2021) 1. Barnet (London Borough) 24. Durham County Council 50. E Northants Council 73. Sunderland City Council 2. Bath & NE Somerset Council 25. East Riding of Yorkshire 51. N. Northants Council 74. Surrey County Council 3. Bedford Borough Council Council 52. Northumberland County 75. Swindon Borough Council 4. Birmingham City Council 26. East Sussex County Council Council 76. Telford & Wrekin Council 5. Bolton Council 27. Essex County Council 53. Nottinghamshire County 77. Torbay Council 6. Bournemouth Christchurch & 28. Gloucestershire County Council 78. Wakefield Metropolitan Poole Council Council 54. Oxfordshire County Council District Council 7. Bracknell Forest Council 29. Hampshire County Council 55. Peterborough City Council 79. Walsall Council 8. Brighton & Hove City Council 30. Herefordshire Council 56. Plymouth City Council 80. Warrington Borough Council 9. Buckinghamshire Council 31. Hertfordshire County Council 57. Portsmouth City Council 81. Warwickshire County Council 10. Cambridgeshire County 32. Hull City Council 58. Reading Borough Council 82. West Berkshire Council Council 33. Isle of Man 59. Rochdale Borough Council 83. West Sussex County Council 11. Central Bedfordshire Council 34. Kent County Council 60. Rutland County Council 84. Wigan Council 12. Cheshire East Council 35. Kirklees Council 61. Salford City Council 85. Wiltshire Council 13. Cheshire West & Chester 36. Lancashire County Council 62. Sandwell Borough Council 86. Wokingham Borough Council Council 37. Leeds City Council 63. Sheffield City Council 14. City of Wolverhampton 38. Leicestershire County Council 64. Shropshire Council Combined Authorities Council 39. Lincolnshire County Council 65. Slough Borough Council • West of England Combined 15. City of York Council 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesbrough Council Local Development Framework Statement of Involvement
    Middlesbrough Council Local Development Framework Statement of Involvement Consultation Statement February 2010 Urban Policy Unit Regeneration Department PO Box 99A Civic Centre Middlesbrough TS1 2QQ T: 01642 729065 E: [email protected] www.middlesbrough.gov.uk Contents Introduction 2 How the consultation was undertaken 2 Appendix 1: List of main and other consultees. Appendix 2: Initial letter sent to main and other consultees Appendix 3: Summary of responses from the initial consultation, including the Council’s response Appendix 4: Public consultation letter sent to main and other consultees Appendix 5: Copy of the Public Notice Appendix 6: Summary of responses from the public consultation, including the Council’s response. The Regeneration Department covers a range of different services of which Urban Policy is one. The Department’s service aims and objectives, along with its diversity and community cohesion commitments are contained in its Service and Diversity Action Plans. Middlesbrough Council – LDF Statement of Community Involvement – Consultation Statement Consultation Report Middlesbrough Council – Local Development Framework Statement of Community Involvement Introduction 1. This document sets out the consultation that was carried out on the revised Statement of Community Involvement, the representations received and the Council’s response to those representations. How the consultation was undertaken 2. Under the provisions of Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2008, the Council sent a letter to its main consultees (see Appendix 1) on 27 August 2009 to inform them of the Council’s intention to review the adopted SCI, and to invite them to comment on what the revised document could include.
    [Show full text]
  • DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? Achieving Longer and Healthier Lives in Middlesbrough
    DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? ACHIEVING LONGER AND HEALTHIER LIVES IN MIDDLESbrougH Middlesbrough DPH Annual Report 2016/17 middlesbrough.gov.uk DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? ACHIEVING LONGER AND HEALTHIER LIVES IN MIDDLESbrougH Middlesbrough DPH Annual Report 2016/17 CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 04 Progress against 2015/16 recommendations ............................................................ 05 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................... 06 Overview of life expectancy and healthy life expectancy in Middlesbrough Chapter 2 Cancer ......................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3 Circulatory diseases ................................................................................ 27 Chapter 4 Respiratory diseases ................................................................................ 33 Chapter 5 External causes ......................................................................................... 38 (accidents and injuries, suicide, alcohol and drugs misuse) Chapter 6 Infant mortality and child deaths ......................................................... 49 Chapter 7 Excess winter mortality ........................................................................... 52 Chapter 8 Recommendations ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions
    User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions Open Report OR/14/017 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN REPORT OR/14/017 User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2010. Keywords Mineral, planning, permission, MHLG. National Grid Reference SW corner 83000, 2800 NE corner 580000, 660000 Front cover Cover picture fuller’s earth working, Woburn sands, Bedfordshire. Bibliographical reference User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/14/017. 15 pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2014 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • VERITAU LIMITED Creation of a Subsidiary
    VERITAU LIMITED Creation of a subsidiary company – requirement for shareholder approval 1.0 Purpose 1.1 To seek shareholder approval for the expansion of Veritau through the creation of a subsidiary company. 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Veritau Limited was established in 2009 as a shared service company. The company is jointly owned by North Yorkshire County Council and the City of York Council. Veritau provides internal audit and other assurance services to the two councils. 2.2 Veritau expanded in 2012, with the creation of a subsidiary company, Veritau North Yorkshire Limited. Veritau North Yorkshire Limited is 50% owned by Veritau Limited with the remaining shares owned by four North Yorkshire district councils. As well as its member councils, the Veritau group provides services to a range of other public sector bodies, including North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service, Doncaster Children’s Services Trust, Selby Housing Trust, 3 x National Park authorities, plus various housing associations, town councils and academy schools. The group operates as a single business under a uniform management structure below board level. The group has common policies, procedures and systems. It has also adopted a single brand image. 2.3 Since its creation, Veritau has been open to other local authorities joining the shared service providing any expansion is in the best interests of the group and its existing shareholders. Recently discussions have been taking place with a number of other councils about them possibly joining the group. The councils are Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, Middlesbrough Council and Scarborough Borough Council. 2.4 To prevent any dilution in control for NYCC and CYC, any new member councils would need join the group by either becoming a member of Veritau North Yorkshire Limited (subject to the agreement of the existing shareholders of the company) or through the creation of a new subsidiary company (similar to Veritau North Yorkshire).
    [Show full text]
  • Nunthorpe Parish Council Tree Policy July 2019
    Nunthorpe Parish Council Policy, principles and guidance on trees in Nunthorpe Nunthorpe Parish Council Trees are a highly valued feature of the parish of Nunthorpe making an enormous contribution to the character and beauty of our landscape. Trees create and maintain environments rich in biodiversity. Nunthorpe Parish Council recognises both the human and environmental benefits of having a healthy and sustainable tree population. The Parish Council has established this Policy, which is subordinate to, but consistent with, Middlesbrough Council’s Tree Policy. POLICY ON MANAGEMENT OF TREES IN NUNTHORPE Nunthorpe Parish Council has agreed to undertake the following ten activities on behalf of the residents of Nunthorpe 1. To monitor and respond to all proposals by Middlesbrough Council for rezoning of land which could entail removal of trees. 2. To monitor and respond to all planning applications to Middlesbrough Council from developers, residents, utility companies or others which could entail removal of trees. 3. To monitor the implementation of Middlesbrough Council's Tree Policy by Council Officers, residents, utility companies, and others, drawing attention to apparent deviation. 4. To urge Middlesbrough Council to engage in meaningful consultation with the Parish Council, Ward Councillors and residents regarding any proposals by Middlesbrough Council to fell mature trees. Nunthorpe Parish Council 5. To encourage Middlesbrough Council to replace trees felled for good cause by Middlesbrough Council with at least an equal number of mature trees in as close proximity as possible to the felled trees, and with specific replacement sites recommended before the felling takes place (whether the trees were removed due to disease, to preserve public safety, or to facilitate development.) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Nunthorpe and Poole Appraisal and Management Plan
    NUNTHORPE AND POOLE CONSERVATION AREA CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL AND MANAGEMENT PLAN June 2008 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Conservation Area Boundary 5 3 Location, Setting and Population 8 4 Historical Analysis 9 - Origins and Development - Archaeology 5 General Character 13 6 Character Area 1 14 7 Character Area 2 18 8 Character Area 3 21 9 Character Area 4 24 10 Character Area 5 27 11 Management Plan 30 12 Preservation Policies 31 13 Enhancement Opportunities 37 Appendices Appendix A References Appendix B Listed Building Descriptions Appendix C Scheduled Ancient Monument Description Appendix D Guidance on works to Historic Buildings and Buildings in Conservation Areas 1 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A List of Maps Map 1 Context Map Map 2 The Conservation Area boundary Map 3 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1853 Map 4 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1894 Map 5 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1915 Map 6 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1938 Map 7 Historic Development Map 8 Figure Ground Map 9 Use plan Map 10 Spaces and Views Map 11 Listed buildings and buildings that make a positive contribution Map 12 Negative and Neutral Factors Map 13 Character Areas Prepared by Woodhall Planning & Conservation, Leeds. June 2008 2 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling in the North York Moors Overview
    Item 8 Cycling in the North York Moors Overview The North York Moors National Park offers some of the best cycling opportunities in the country. Nearby lie large urban populations in Teesside and Scarborough – just 4km away in some places. Accessing from these conurbations is however difficult. Roads and railways present significant barriers, public transport is not geared up to carry cycles and there is not an awareness of the opportunities or the confidence to make the journey for beginner and novice cyclists. The proposals set out below will provide safe and largely traffic free cycle routes and greatly improved public transport links which combined with education, training and support programme will get many new people cycling and enjoying what the North York Moors National Park has to offer. Improvements to the network within the National Park will complement the new links and present a real boost to the tourism offer, encouraging more people to visit the National Park with their cycles or to hire cycles whilst they visit. The North York Moors is the location for around 9m visitor days each year, it is the National Park Authority’s aim to increase this by 1m and provide a real boost to the local economy. These proposals will form a major step forward by developing one of the best, iconic off road cycle routes in the country and complementing the international standard facilities at Dalby Forest. The proposals set out below are the first stages in delivering a 10 year strategy for cycling in the North York Moors and working towards a vision.
    [Show full text]