DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Name of Property Historic name: Oxford Downtown Historic District________________________________ Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: N/A___________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ Location Street & number: Washington Street/Michigan-24 and Burdick Street_________________ City or town: Oxford____________ State: MI____________ County: Oakland__________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: __________________________________________ __________________________________ State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide _x__local Applicable National Register Criteria: _x__A ___B _x__C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property x meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Oxford Downtown Historic District Oakland, MI Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: x Public – Local x Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) District x Site Structure Object Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Oxford Downtown Historic District Oakland, MI Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing _ 34________ _____7________ buildings _ 1________ _____1______ sites _ ___________ _____3________ structures _ 2________ _____7________ objects _ 37________ ____18________ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _0________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) COMMERCE/TRADE: business, professional, bank, department store, restaurant SOCIAL: meeting hall RECREATION AND CULTURE: park, monument/marker LANDSCAPE: city park EDUCATION: library HEALTH CARE: medical office Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) COMMERCE/TRADE: business, professional, bank, department store, restaurant EDUCATION: school district offices RECREATION AND CULTURE: park, monument/marker LANDSCAPE: park, monument/marker ___________________ ___________________ Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Oxford Downtown Historic District Oakland, MI Name of Property County and State _____________________________________________________________________________ Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) Late Victorian: Italianate, Queen Anne Late 19th and 20th Century Revivals: Colonial Revival, Neo-Classical Revival Late 19th and Early 20th Century American Movements: Commercial Style Modern Movement: Art Deco, Moderne, Modernistic Other: Mansard Revival, Commercial Brick ___________________ Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: Brick, stone, limestone, weatherboard, plywood, wood shingle, stucco, concrete, glass, vinyl________________________ Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph The Oxford Downtown Historic District is the commercial nucleus of the one-square-mile Village of Oxford. The village is located in Oxford Township, in northeast Oakland County, approximately thirteen miles northeast of the county seat, Pontiac. The downtown is bisected by state highway M-24, locally known as Washington Street. M-24 is a major trunkline road that provides access to I-75 and Pontiac area/suburban Detroit to the south; and I-69 and further north to Michigan’s thumb region. The historic district is centered on approximately two commercial blocks of Washington Street, and includes two commercial buildings that front on the major east- west cross street, Burdick Street. The district includes forty-four buildings, and one site, as well as associated structures and objects, all of which date from circa 1880 to the present time. Eighty percent of the resources were constructed during the period of significance of 1876-1968, beginning with the earliest extant buildings; many of which were constructed after the arrival of the Detroit and Bay City Railroad (1872); and passage of the village charter (1876) when the village came into its own as a commercial center; and ends fifty years ago. The buildings range from one to three stories in height and embody a range of architectural styles, including: Italianate, Queen Anne, Neo Classical, Art Deco, Colonial Revival, and influences of mid- century modern movements. The predominant function of the district buildings is commercial, although historically, there were social and governmental uses as well. Naturally, alterations to Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Oxford Downtown Historic District Oakland, MI Name of Property County and State the buildings and resources have occurred, however the resources cumulatively retain the aspects of integrity necessary to convey significance with commerce, social organizations, and architecture. ______________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description The village of Oxford covers a one-square mile area within Oxford Township, in northeast Oakland County.1 The village has a population of 3,436, with an additional 20,526 people living in the surrounding township.2 The village and township are among the northern-most metropolitan Detroit suburbs, located approximately thirteen miles northeast of Pontiac, the Oakland county seat, and thirty-five miles north of Detroit. Adjacent towns include Lake Orion, three miles south with a population of 2,973; Rochester and Rochester Hills, thirteen miles southeast and a combined population of 83,706; and Lapeer, fourteen miles north and a population 8,841. The landscape surrounding the village was historically rural and largely occupied by agricultural fields. In the mid-twentieth century, the area surrounding Oxford experienced a wave of suburbanization with housing developments spread between wooded areas; a pattern of development which has continued into the early twenty-first century. Active gravel pits are located north of the village limits. The Oxford Downtown Historic District is comprised of the extant historic resources within the commercial center of the village. The downtown area is concentrated on two roads, North and South Washington Street (M-24) and East and West Burdick Street. Washington Street is essentially north/south, but within
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CMA Landscape Master Plan
    THE CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN DECEMBER 2018 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN The rehabilitation of the Cleveland Museum of Art’s grounds requires the creativity, collaboration, and commitment of many talents, with contributions from the design team, project stakeholders, and the grounds’ existing and intended users. Throughout the planning process, all have agreed, without question, that the Fine Arts Garden is at once a work of landscape art, a treasured Cleveland landmark, and an indispensable community asset. But the landscape is also a complex organism—one that requires the balance of public use with consistency and harmony of expression. We also understand that a successful modern public space must provide more than mere ceremonial or psychological benefits. To satisfy the CMA’s strategic planning goals and to fulfill the expectations of contemporary users, the museum grounds should also accommodate as varied a mix of activities as possible. We see our charge as remaining faithful to the spirit of the gardens’ original aesthetic intentions while simultaneously magnifying the rehabilitation, ecological health, activation, and accessibility of the grounds, together with critical comprehensive maintenance. This plan is intended to be both practical and aspirational, a great forward thrust for the benefit of all the people forever. 0' 50' 100' 200' 2 The Cleveland Museum of Art Landscape Master Plan 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CMA Landscape Master Plan Committee Consultants William Griswold Director and President Sasaki Heather Lemonedes
    [Show full text]
  • Experience a Real Departure from Ordinary Shopping! Ohio Station Outlets Is the First and Only Themed Outlet Center in the World
    Experience a Real Departure from Ordinary Shopping! Ohio Station Outlets is the first and only themed outlet center in the world. The architecture, history, entertainment, and hand-crafted vintage trains ferrying shoppers throughout the center, combined with the hottest brands in outlet shopping, create an experience tour groups will definitely not want to miss. @ohiostation /ohiostation @ohiostation 1 Quicken Loans Arena Home of the NBA Champion Cleveland Cavaliers Lake Erie 2 Progressive Field Home of the AL Champion CLEVELAND 3 Cleveland Indians 3 Rock and Roll Hall of 1 2 Fame and Museum 5 Mall Hours 4 4 Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Monday-Saturday: 5 Cedar Point 10 a.m. - 9 p.m. 6 Castle Noel 7 Historic Medina Square From Toledo Sunday: Home of AI Root Candle 10 a.m.- 6 p.m. 8 Akron Art Museum 11 From 9 Akron Children’s Museum Youngstown Train Hours 10 Lock 3 Monday-Saturday: Concerts and Attractions 6 7 12 p.m. - 7 p.m. 11 Cuyahoga Valley Scenic AKRON 8 B 9 Sunday: Railroad MEDINA 10 12 p.m. - 5 p.m. 12 Pro Football Hall of Fame LODI C D 13 Amish Country Lodging: To schedule your A Hampton Inn Wooster tour group, contact: BURBANK B Hawthorn Suites 12 Akron/Seville CANTON Barbara Potts C Comfort Inn & Suites A Exit 204 Guest Services Manager Wadsworth From 13 Ohio Station Outlets D Holiday Inn Express & Columbus (330) 948-9929 Suites Wadsworth Ohio Station Outlets • 9911 Avon Lake Road • Burbank, Ohio 44214 • Take I-71 S., Exit 204 • 330-948-1239 Experience..
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Memorial Bridge Adjacent to the Base of the Lincoln Memorial
    Arlington Memorial Bridge HAER No. DC-7 Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, VA. Washington District of Columbia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ARLINGTON MEMORIAL BRIDGE HAER No. DC-7 Location: Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C., spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, Arlington, VA. UTM: 18/321680/4306600 Quad.: Washington West Date of Construction: Designed 1929, Completed 1932 Architects: McKim, Mead and White, New York, New York; William Mitchell Kendall, Designer Engineer: John L. Nagle, W.J. Douglas, Consulting Engineer, Joseph P. Strauss, Bascule Span Engineer Contractor: Forty contractors under the supervision of the Arlington Bridge Commission Present Owner: National Capital Region National Park Service Department of the Interior Present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian bridge Significance: As the final link in the chain of monuments which start at the Capitol building, the Arlington Memorial Bridge connects the Mall in Washington, D.C. with Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. Designed to connect, both physically and symbolically, the North and the South, this bridge, as designed in the Neoclassical style, complements the other monumental buildings in Washington such as the White House, the Lincoln Memorial, and the Jefferson Memorial. Memorial Bridge was designed by William Mitchell Kendall while in the employ of McKim, Mead and White, a prominent architectural firm based in New York City. Although designed and built almost thirty years after the McMillan Commission had been disbanded, this structure reflects the original intention of the Commission which was to build a memorial bridge on this site which would join the North and South.
    [Show full text]
  • February 10, 2011 Presentation
    GROUP PLAN COMMISSION FEBRUARY 10, 2011 Group Plan Commission Anthony Coyne, Group Plan Commission, Chair David T. Abbott, Planning and Urban Design, Chair Paul Clark Jennifer Coleman Paul Dolan Dan Gilbert Mike Holmgren Kathryn Lincoln Henry Meyer III Douglas Miller, Governance and Implementation, Chair Don Misheff, Finance, Chair Albert Ratner Ronn Richard DRAFT Eugene Sanders Felton Thomas, Public Participation and Community Engagement,DRAFT Chair DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT GROUP PLAN COMMISSION PLANNING + URBAN DESIGN WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 P+UD MEMBERS: DAVID T. ABBOTT, CHAIR JENNIFER COLEMAN TONY COYNE LEN KOMOROSKI KATHRYN LINCOLN DOUG MILLER TERRY SCHWARZ DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Planning + Urban Design Working Group was charged with identifying the physical projects and policy recommendations needed to create a vision for a unified downtown that would capitalize on the current development agenda and spur more growth. The group was tasked with identifying projects that would: • Create a connection between the downtown core and the lakefront •Enhance The Mall (A, B & C) beyond the scope of the baseline plan to be built as a part of the Medical Mart and Convention Center project and rebrand this center of our community as “The Mall” •Catalyze Public Square •Create connections between developments The Working Group engaged professional design consultants, the local design community and studied previous efforts that focused on Public Square to develop its priority recommendations. These are: •A Pedestrian Bridge from The Mall to the Great Lakes Science Center •The transformation of Public Square •The creation of ‘Healthy Streets’ designed sustainably to create vital east/west connections, while easing the connection between the three Plazas which make up The Mall.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage of Books on Cleveland
    A L....--_----' Heritage of Books on Cleveland Cleveland Heritage Program A HERITAGE OF BOOKS: A Selected Bibliography of Books and Related Materials on Cleveland to be found at the Cleveland Public Library by Matthew F. Browarek CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY 1984 Cover photograph: Hiram House Station C 1920 Archives. Cleveland Public Library PREFACE The Cleveland Heritage Program was born out of the conviction that the city of Cleve­ land possesses unique qualities worth capturing in pictures and words. In designing the program, Professor Thomas Campbell of Cleveland State University and I were prompted less by a desire to evoke nostalgia than to retrieve fugitive material for the benefit of scholars whose work will help us to understand how and why our city is what it is. If the uses of history are to serve the present generation, then the Cleveland Heritage Program has done its work well. Funded primarily by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the program was carried on over a two-year period from 1981 to 1983. Important supple­ mentary grants were made by the Cleveland Foundation, the George Gund Foundation and Nathan L. Dauby Fund. Also, the Cleveland Heritage Program greatly benefited from the cooperation of the following institutions: the Cleveland Public Schools, the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland, the Greater Cleveland Growth Association, the Western Reserve Historical Society, Cuyahoga Community College, WVIZ-TV and the College of Urban Affairs of Cleveland State University. Under Professor Campbell and his many able assistants, diligent research recovered valuable artifacts, photographs and oral histories relating to several of Cleveland's neigh­ borhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Red Line/HealthLine Re imagine Extension Study the RTA Executive Summary Employment, medical, and education centers located Overview in University Circle can be reached directly via the RTA HealthLine and Red Line without the need for “the last The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA) mile” transit distribution system. This means people can examined potential HealthLine bus rapid transit and Red very easily reach their final destinations in University Line rail extensions that best satisfy mobility needs of Circle by walking, thereby eliminating the need for more people living in Collinwood, East Cleveland, and Euclid. parking in the area or a bus transfer. After several years of technical analysis and an The Red Line/HealthLine Extension Study focused on award-winning, collaborative public outreach effort addressing the future mobility problems in the study area among the RTA, its study partners and a variety of by providing: stakeholders, the study is now complete. Improved transit service from the northeast quadrant Highlighted in this executive summary are a high-level of Cuyahoga County to University Circle and Midtown, study process overview and resulting findings. Detailed and points beyond and in between; and, technical documentation is contained in the study’s More connections to the regional transit system from technical memoranda and reports, which are referenced neighborhood stations to which people can walk throughout this summary. All project documentation also can be found on the RTA study website: The study also aimed to support land use as well as riderta.com/majorprojects/redlinehealthlineextension. community reinvestment plans and redevelopment goals, including: Purpose and Need Mobility Need Enhancing transportation options, Many studies and activities from 1960 to 2015 have led service, and connections to current to the Red Line/HealthLine Extension Study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gamut Looks at Cleveland, Special Edition, 1986
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU The Gamut Archives Publications 1986 The Gamut Looks at Cleveland, Special Edition, 1986 Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/gamut_archives Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Cleveland State University, "The Gamut Looks at Cleveland, Special Edition, 1986" (1986). The Gamut Archives. 37. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/gamut_archives/37 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Gamut Archives by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright ©1986 by Cleveland State University. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. At The Gamut we pride ourselves on our limitless scope. We like to say that we specialize in being general, that the variety of our articles is endless, on subjects as esoteric as the dying languages of Mayan Indians and as down-to-earth as forecasting the weather, as serious as a new definition of death and as whimsical as a history of dogs in church. But there is one area in which we do specialize - we are a regional journal, and in particular, a Cleveland journal. We have allowed ourselves to be partial to articles about the city by Cleveland writers, and those writers have not let us down. This collection gathers together, for the first time, some of our favorite articles on Cleveland from The Gamut's first six years.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaker Lakes Garden Club
    Shaker Lakes Garden Club The History of The Shaker Lakes Garden Club 1915-1995 It is with a great deal of pleasure that The Shaker Lakes Garden Club presents this history of our club to its members to celebrate our club eightieth anniversary (1915-1995) as well as our seventy- five years as members of The Garden Club of America. In the beginning, Shaker Lakes Park was originally part of The Shaker Colony, a disappearing religious sect, which sold several of its parcels along the eastern end of Doan Brook including two Shaker Lakes to John D. Rockefeller in 1889. The park was a natural area including lovely old trees and rare plant material which Rockefeller wished to preserve by transferring it to the City of Cleveland to be used for public park purposes forever. In 1915, four intrepid ladies gathered around a cozy fire in a home overlooking the Lower Shaker Lake. Having lived near this parkway that surrounds the Shaker Lakes and the northern branch of Doan Brook, these ladies were very familiar with the conditions that existed there and the neglect of the area by the Park Board. Individual complaints to the chairman of the Park Board were ignored, but he finally said, Why don't you ladies organize? If you were to come to us as the representatives of an active and influential organization, I think I can promise you that your request will receive more attention from the Board. So Mrs. James H. Rogers, Mrs. John Ranney, Mrs. Henry Gardner, and Mrs. Harry J. Crawford organized.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context
    3.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT 3.1 Overview of Ohio, 1940–1950 During World War II, Ohio experienced significant industrial development and population growth. The state’s diversified industrial base and geographical proximity to transportation routes and other population centers made it well suited for wartime production needs. The industrial development and consequential economic prosperity generated during World War II shaped Ohio’s economic, cultural, and social history for decades thereafter. The United States resisted involvement in World War II from 1939 through much of 1941. Even as the Axis powers swept through Europe and eastern Asia, American isolationists insisted that the U.S. had no key interests at stake. At President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s urging, Congress enacted a “cash and carry” policy in 1939, allowing the U.S. to supply goods to any nation that could pay cash and carry the goods away (Knepper 2003:367). While providing great assistance to Great Britain and its allies, the program also offered economic benefits to the U.S., which remained enmeshed in the Great Depression. More importantly, it began the process of shifting American industries to a wartime footing. In September 1940, Congress established the first peacetime military draft in the nation’s history. The Ohio National Guard was activated and designated the 37th Division. Guard units traveled to Camp Shelby, Mississippi, for training. In Columbus, Fort Hayes served as a reception center for military draftees and recruits and was staffed by 2,000 troops in its own right (Fort Hayes Metropolitan Education Center 2010). Roosevelt, a Democrat, handily won Ohio in the November 1940 presidential election, but Republicans dominated the state government and the Congressional delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Civic Core Press
    CLEVELAND CIVIC CORE Burnham Mall / Convention Center / Global Center for Health Innovation Cleveland, Ohio Cleveland Burnham Mall / Convention Center / Global Center for Health Innovation LMN CLEVELAND CIVIC CORE Burnham Mall, Convention Center, and Global Center for Health Innovation CLEVELAND, OHIO Cleveland’s Civic Core is rebuilt with strategic infrastructure that supports and Location and Completion enriches both the historic vision and the contemporary community. Cleveland, Ohio 2013 Catalyst for Economic and Urban Renewal in Cleveland Cleveland’s new Convention Center and Global Center for Health Innovation (GCHI) Client plays a pivotal role in the rust belt city’s shift from heavy industry to a medical MMPI technology-based economy. The new $465 million project includes a major renovation and restoration of the city’s signature public open space, the historic Burnham Mall. Architect A new park on top of the below-grade Convention Center also provides much needed LMN: Design Architect green space to meet the needs of an influx of residents moving back into the city URS: Design Build Architect center. Project Size 235,000 sf Medical Mart and Entry Following a decades-long decline in population, from a high of 914,808 in 1950 to Pavilion 396,815 in 2010, Cleveland was searching for economic development and a new urban 767,000 sf Convention Center vision. The new Convention Center and GHCI was conceived as a way to leverage the city’s reputation as a medical research hub centered on the Cleveland Clinic. Project Cost $465 Million LMN began working with the Cleveland Planning Commission in 1998 on a feasibility and site selection study for the new Convention Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trust for Public Land CREATING PARKS for PEOPLE – CONNECTING CLEVELAND THROUGH PARKS and TRAILS
    The Trust for Public Land CREATING PARKS FOR PEOPLE – CONNECTING CLEVELAND THROUGH PARKS AND TRAILS in partnership with: Lake Link Trail Corridor – Location/Context • The Proposed Trail Corridor travels along vacated Road and Railroad Corridors on the west bank of Cuyahoga River through 3 River Peninsulas. Irishtown Bend (Columbus Ave. to Detroit Ave.) Main Peninsula (Detroit Ave. to River Rd.) Whiskey Island (River Road to Wendy Park) • Approximately 9,000 ft long (1.7) miles in length from Towpath connection. IRISHTOWN GREENWAY: A Strategic Plan for the FLATS WEST BANK Cleveland, OH ▪ May 5, 2014 ▪ K2 2 Collaboration The Lake Link Trail will connect and unite: - Cleveland’s lakefront parks - The Cuyahoga River - The Towpath Trail - The Cleveland Lakefront Bikeway - Over 50,000 Cleveland residents Cleveland - Downtown workers and tourists Central State - Cleveland State University Business University - Lakefront redevelopment District Proposed Downtown Lake Link Connector Trail Trail Ohio City Cudell / Edgewater Detroit Shoreway Tremont Proposed Red Line Greenway Zone Rec. Center Clark Field Proposed Clark Avenue Bike Lanes Connecting Cleveland Plan West Side Community Context 1 West 65th to to Lake Link / Towpath to Canal Basin Park / to Downtown Opportunity Corridor Bikeway Edgewater Park Trail Towpath Trail Cleveland to University Circle Kinsman Proposed Red Zone Rec. Line Greenway Center Clark Proposed Field Proposed Clark Kingsbury Run Proposed Avenue Bike Lanes Trail Downtown Clark Fulton Stockyards Connector Trail Morgana Run Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Ohio City Tremont
    D OA R AL N GI AR M H UT SO E U EN AV E ID ES E K A A S L BURKE T 2 6 T H LAKEFRONT S T R E E AIRPORT T E A B C D E F G H NU VE A IR LA C ST D A O R L 1 A Asian DOWNTOWN N I G Town R A Center M H E T A U S O T S 3 8 E T E A H S A E S International Women’s D S U T A N T O T E ASIATOWN 3 R Air & Space Museum R E V 6 U 2 A E E L N E T A E 3 R A H E N V R A IO S T I A S R G E D E T S R D T P T A I S U 3 R M S T 2 4 E 6 S E E H K R A T T A T H E R E H S Goodtime III E L E E T O U A T S N N T S E S E 3 T V E T A R U T R 3 A N S R E T E 2 E Voinovich R V 5 T D E O A E T P T T 3 S Lake �ie N N H E 2 O T Park E T A N V L S R A I S D Cleveland D M T T E E A R S E USS Cod A H 3 T Script Sign E E E 1 T S E A S R A E Submarine Y T E T S T E S T E A A 2 U S 2 0 N T T S W E 3 T T E 1 T E H V 3 R S A R A 0 E T 3 O S R T E S 5 MINUTE WALK Rock & Dock I 8 H T A P T T E H T Steamship S R L A E L H Marina C U 3 S L E N S A T 7 William G.
    [Show full text]