Bus Timetable Sept 2020- July 2021
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prestbury Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan
DRAFT Prestbury Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan Cheltenham Borough Council Planning Policy Team Local Plan Draft Document May 2017 The Prestbury Conservation Area Appraisal is a draft document and will not come into force until the consultation stage is completed and they have been adopted by Chel- tenham Borough Council. Any suggested boundary change will not take place until that time. For any comments please contact [email protected] For more information on the existing Conservation Area Apprisails please click here. Swindon Village Prestbury Pitville Springbank Hester’s St Way Peter’s Whaddon Fiddler’s Green Oakley Fairview St Mark’s Lansdown Battledown The Reddings Bournside Hatherley The Park Charlton Park Charlton Kings Leckhampton Prestbury Conservation Area Conservation Areas (c) Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordanance Survey 10024384 Map 1. The location of Prestbury Conservation Area and other conservation areas in Cheltenham Prestbury Conservation Area Appraisal- Contents Contents 1.0 Introduction 01 6.0 Assessment of Condition 24 1.1 What is a Conservation Area? 01 6.1 General Condition 24 1.2 What is a Conservation Area Ap- 01 6.2 Key Threats 24 praisal and Management Plan? 6.3 Threats to Buildings 25 Implications of Conservation Area 1.3 01 6.4 Threats to Streetscape 25 Designation 1.4 Community Involvement 01 1.5 Dates of survey, adoption and pub- 01 lication 1.6 Proposed extensions 01 1.7 Statement of Special Character 02 Part 1: Appraisal 2.0 Context 05 2.1 Location and Setting -
(PPG) MEETING – 1430 on 3 SEP 19 Present
4 Sep 19 THE ALNEY PRACTICE – PRACTICE PARTICIPATION GROUP (PPG) MEETING – 1430 ON 3 SEP 19 Present: Apologies Philip Tagg (PT) Practice Manager Katherine Holland (KH) Rachael Banfield (RB) Health Care Assistant CCG Jeremy Base (JB) Pamela Dewick (KD) Jennifer Taylor (JT) Geoffrey Gidley (GG) Megan Birchley (MB) Mark Weaver (MW) Ken Newman (KN) Nadia Schneider (NS) Carol Kurylat (CK) Taras Kurylat (TK) Denise Leach (DL) Nicky Milligan (NM) 1. PT welcomed attendees to the meeting and thanked them for expressing an interest in establishing a PPG. He explained the background to the former PPGs for the pre-merger practices: • Cheltenham Road Surgery’s PPG was made up of members of the ‘Friends of Cheltenham Road Surgery’, which was a registered charity with the principal aim of raising funds for the surgery, to be spent to the benefit of its patients. The Friends ceased to operate several years ago when several of the members became too old to continue and there were no volunteers willing to take on committee roles. Subsequent attempts to create a replacement PPG were unsuccessful. • College Yard and Highnam had a PPG, which ceased to be active around the time of the merger. 2. PPGs aim to be representative of the practice population and have a principal aim of meeting on regular basis to discuss the services on offer, and how improvements can be made for the benefit of patients and the practice. This initial meeting aimed to set the scene and agree a way ahead. PT also indicated that as a result of the practice merger we will be liable for a CQC inspection before the end of Mar 20, with the potential that they will wish to speak with the PPG at that time. -
Hereford to Ross-On-Wye & Gloucester Gloucester to Ross-On
Valid from 5 January 2020 Page 1 of 2 33 Gloucester to Ross-on-Wye & Hereford MONDAYS TO SATURDAYS except Bank Holiday Mondays MF MF Sat Sat MF Sat MF Sat MF 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Gloucester Transport Hub [H] 0640 0740 0745 0850 0950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1450 1550 1600 1650 1710 1750 Churcham Bulley Lane 0651 0752 0759 0904 1004 1104 1204 1304 1404 1504 1504 1604 1614 1704 1724 1804 Huntley Red Lion 0655 0756 0803 0908 1008 1108 1208 1308 1408 1508 1508 1608 1618 1708 1728 1808 Mitcheldean Lamb 0706 0808 0814 0919 1019 1119 1219 1319 1419 1519 1519 1619 1629 1719 1739 1819 Lea The Crown 0715 0817 0823 0928 1028 1128 1228 1328 1428 1528 1528 1628 1638 1728 1748 1828 Pontshill Postbox - 0822 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Weston-u-Penyard Penyard Gardens 0720 0826 0828 0933 1033 1133 1233 1333 1433 1533 1533 1633 1643 1733 1753 1833 John Kyrle High School - 0835 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ross-on-Wye Cantilupe Road [1] arr. 0730 0840 0835 0940 1040 1140 1240 1340 1440 1540 1540 1640 1650 1740 1800 1840 q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Ross-on-Wye Cantilupe Road [1] dep. 0635 0735 0745 0845 0845 0845 0945 1045 1145 1245 1345 1445 1545 1545 1645 1655 1845 John Kyrle High School - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1550 - - - Peterstow Post Offi ce 0647 0747 0757 0857 0857 0857 0957 1057 1157 1257 1357 1457 1557 1602 1657 1707 1857 Kingsthorne Little Birch Turn 0702 0802 0812 0912 0912 0912 1012 1112 1212 1312 1412 1512 1612 1617 1712 1722 1912 Hereford Bridge Street 0717 0827 0827 0927 0927 0927 1027 1127 1227 1327 1427 1527 1627 1632 1727 1737 1927 Hereford Railway Station 0725 0835 0835 0935 0935 0935 1035 1135 1235 1335 1435 1535 1635 1640 1735 1745 1935 MF Only runs on Mondays to Fridays. -
Secondary School and Academy Admissions
Secondary School and Academy Admissions INFORMATION BOOKLET 2021/2022 For children born between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2010 Page 1 Schools Information Admission number and previous applications This is the total number of pupils that the school can admit into Year 7. We have also included the total number of pupils in the school so you can gauge its size. You’ll see how oversubscribed a school is by how many parents had named a school as one of their five preferences on their application form and how many of these had placed it as their first preference. Catchment area Some comprehensive schools have a catchment area consisting of parishes, district or county boundaries. Some schools will give priority for admission to those children living within their catchment area. If you live in Gloucestershire and are over 3 miles from your child’s catchment school they may be entitled to school transport provided by the Local Authority. Oversubscription criteria If a school receives more preferences than places available, the admission authority will place all children in the order in which they could be considered for a place. This will strictly follow the priority order of their oversubscription criteria. Please follow the below link to find the statistics for how many pupils were allocated under the admissions criteria for each school - https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/education-and-learning/school-admissions-scheme-criteria- and-protocol/allocation-day-statistics-for-gloucestershire-schools/. We can’t guarantee your child will be offered one of their preferred schools, but they will have a stronger chance if they meet higher priorities in the criteria. -
Annual Review 2015 - 2016 Transforming Lives, Supporting Business
Annual Review 2015 - 2016 Transforming Lives, Supporting Business www.gloscol.ac.uk Contents From the Chair 2 From the Chair and the Principal and the Principal Chair’s Welcome Further Education Colleges (FE) make the difference 3 Our Provision between the next steps on to the ladder of a worthwhile Meeting the Skills career, or settling for low paid jobs. Colleges are the choice of significantly more young adults than universities Needs of the County each year and help ensure a professional, technically skilled workforce can help grow the UK economy. 4 Investing to Meet the The Board of Gloucestershire College believes passionately in the value of Further Education in the county Needs of the County to meet the demands of labour markets, employers and students. 5 Transforming Lives That is why it is determined to continue its mission to upskill students and help them progress into a world of better paid work. Gloucestershire College students must leave for their destinations Student Success equipped, not just by training but also by hands-on experience. That is why, in 2015, the College invested directly in successful businesses, such as Graduations at no.9 and Chelsea Bar and Brasserie to name but two of several, in which students become immersed in the real world of work 6 Supporting Business and use the practical skills they have learned. Initiatives like these, combined with an increased emphasis on the teaching of Science, Technology, English and Maths (STEM), will ensure students leave work-ready to meet the needs of Gloucestershire’s employers. 7 Supporting our The world of FE is changing, significantly and fast! That is why Gloucestershire College is changing Community too, as part of its Strategic Plan, to provide greater organisational agility and a more effective operation which maintains and enhances the focus on students and employers as the key drivers of the organisation. -
Issue 37 | Apr 2018 Comedy, Literature & Film in Stroud
AN INDEPENDENT, FREE MONTHLY GUIDE TO MUSIC, ART, THEATRE, ISSUE 37 | APR 2018 COMEDY, LITERATURE & FILM IN STROUD. WWW.GOODONPAPER.INFO ISSUE #37 Inside: Annual Site Festival: Record Festival Moomins & Store Day Guide The Comet 2018 + The Clay Loft | Mark Huband | Bandit | Film Posters Reinterpreted Cover image by Joe Magee Joe image by Cover #37 | Apr 2018 EDITOR Advertising/Editorial/Listings: Editor’s Note Alex Hobbis [email protected] DESIGNER Artwork and Design Welcome To The Thirty Seventh Issue Of Good On Adam Hinks [email protected] Paper – Your Free Monthly Guide To Music Concerts, Art Exhibitions, Theatre Productions, Comedy Shows, ONLINE FACEBOOK TWITTER Film Screenings And Literature Events In Stroud… goodonpaper.info /GoodOnPaperStroud @GoodOnPaper_ Well Happy Birthday to us…Good On Paper is three! And we’ve gone a bit bumper. 32 PRINTED BY: pages this month – the most pages we have ever printed in one issue. All for you. To read. Then maybe recycle. Or use as kindling (these vegetable inks burn remarkably well). Tewkesbury Printing Company With it being our anniversary issue we’ve made a few design changes – specifically to the universal font and also to the front cover. For the next year we will be inviting some of our favourite local artists to design the front cover image – simply asking them to supply a piece of new work which might relate to one of the articles featured in that particular SPONSORED BY: issue. This month we asked our friend the award winning film maker and illustrator Joe Magee... Well that’s it for now, hope you enjoy this bigger issue of Good On Paper. -
Land at Leckhampton Leckhampton Gloucestershire Archaeological
Land at Leckhampton Leckhampton Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation for RPS Planning and Development CA Project: 3581 CA Report: 11301 January 2012 Land at Leckhampton Leckhampton Gloucestershire Archaeological Evaluation CA Project: 3581 CA Report: 11301 prepared by Stuart Joyce date 31 January 2012 checked by Cliff Bateman, Project Manager date 31 January 2012 approved by Simon Cox, Head of Fieldwork signed date 31 January 2012 issue 01 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Building 11, Kemble Enterprise Park, Kemble, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6BQ t. 01285 771022 f. 01285 771033 e. [email protected] © Cotswold Archaeology Land at Leckhampton, Gloucestershire: Archaeological Evaluation CONTENTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 3 2. RESULTS (FIGS 2-7) .......................................................................................... 5 3. DISCUSSION....................................................................................................... 15 4. CA PROJECT TEAM .......................................................................................... -
Outreach Residential Activities
Outreach Residential Activities 2017/18 2017/18 RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY REPORT: 16 DECEMBER 2018 University of Gloucestershire Widening Participation and Outreach - Data & Evaluation Officer, Partnerships Manager 1 Residential Report Outreach and Widening Participation Team, University of Gloucestershire Each year, the Outreach team organises and delivers two separate Residential Events for Year 10 and Year 12 students with the intention of providing an intensive experience on a university campus. The residential activities aim to build higher education (HE) knowledge to enable young people to make an informed decision about their future. Students are provided with an opportunity to learn more about the subjects that are available and the processes required to apply for HE. It is hoped that students will increase their self-confidence in their ability to attend higher education and develop a sense of belonging at university, as well as reduce barriers to participate in higher education. Both residentials take place over a four day period, with the first day allowing time and space for students to settle in and socialise with each other and the summer school staff. Student Ambassadors live residentially for the duration of each summer school, supporting the running of the events and providing their own insights into university life and their routes to higher education. Students who attend the Year 10 residential take part in a wider range of academic taster sessions while Year 12 students choose a subject strand to follow. This is so that they can try a range of courses within an Academic School to provide more insight into which course they might choose to study in the future. -
Annual Review 2016-2017
Annual Review 2016-2017 - Learning that works Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Our Provision: Learning that Works ................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Investing to Meet the Needs of the County...................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Transforming Lives - Student Success ............................................................................................................ 9 5.0 Supporting Business........................................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Superdry: Redefining apprenticeships ............................................................................................................. 12 6.0 Supporting our Community .................................................................................................................................... 14 7.0 Working in Partnership ........................................................................................................................................... 16 8.0 Staff Equipped to Support Success.................................................................................................................. 18 9.0 Governance......................................................................................................................................................... -
The Iron Age Tom Moore
The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996). -
Cllr Hiltonj
Liberal Democrat Boundary Review Submission Gloucester City Council - Sept 2014 Introduction This submission outlines the proposal for new ward boundaries for Gloucester City Council. There will be nineteen wards of various sizes. Across the city, there will be thirty nine councillors. There are 12 wards with two councillors, 4 wards with three councillors and 3 wards with one councillor. All wards are within the maximum variation of 10% based on the 2020 figure of 2,584 electors per councillor. The Liberal Democrat group on Gloucester City Council is proposing the new boundaries. All party agreement Eight of the new wards being proposed within this report have unanimous support from members of Gloucester City Council, as agreed at the council meeting on the 25th September. A report from the city council with supporting evidence will be sent to the Boundary Commission separately. The eight wards with all party agreement are as follows 1. Barton & Tredworth – 3 councillors (existing boundaries) 2. Elmbridge – 2 councillors 3. Kingsholm & Wotton – 2 councillors 4. Kingsway – 2 councillors 5. Longlevens – 3 councillors (existing boundaries) 6. Quedgeley Fieldcourt – 2 councillors 7. Quedgeley Severn Vale – 2 councillors 8. Tuffley – 2 councillors (existing boundaries) No change in boundaries We are proposing that there is no change to two wards, where we don’t have all party agreement. 1. Moreland – 3 councillors (existing boundaries) 2. Podsmead – 1 councillor (existing boundaries) Wards on new boundaries We are proposing nine wards with new boundaries. Some of these proposals will be the same as that being suggested by one of the other two groups on the council. -
Forest of Dean Plan Hwc , Item 9
1. Overview of the Forest of Dean The modelled demand for future developments of housing with care in the Forest of Dean has highlighted an additional requirement as detailed in Table 1. Table 1: Modelled demand for housing with care Housing with care model Extra care Extra care affordable rent by 2041 Supported living by 2035 shared ownership/outright sales by 2041 Additional units required 182 0 20 Future developments of housing with care in the Forest of Dean need to consider the specific challenges and opportunities that delivering housing with care in the Forest of Dean presents: The Forest of Dean has a population of roughly 85,9571 spread over an area of 226 square miles.2 The district takes its name from the Forest of Dean itself, which forms a large part of the district and is the largest landscape feature. As well as the forest, the main geographical influences are the Severn Estuary and the Wye Valley, all of which are natural boundaries but also barriers to development. The district is adjacent to Wales and the West Midlands. Although some parts are closest to Gloucester, other parts are closer to Bristol, Newport and Hereford. The Forest of Dean is made up of 27 wards.3 Appendix 1 provides a breakdown of ONS population data; current levels of domiciliary care funded by Gloucestershire County Council (GCC); residential/nursing care; extra care and supported living at ward level. The Forest of Dean Core Strategy (FoDCS) indicates that the majority of growth within the district is likely to be planned in and around Bristol, Newport and Cardiff.4 The regeneration of the four major towns; Cinderford, Coleford, Lydney and Newent, is central to the FoDCS.